:00:16. > :00:19.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:20. > :00:22.With me are the journalist Sean Dilley and The Guardian
:00:23. > :00:47.The Daily Mail has said that RAF drone strikes have taken out British
:00:48. > :00:55.jet -- jihadists. The Metro's main story
:00:56. > :00:57.is the killing of Helen Bailey by her fiancee Ian Stewart,
:00:58. > :01:00.and asks if he killed The Telegraph leads on the story
:01:01. > :01:03.of the British suicide bomber Ronald Fiddler,
:01:04. > :01:06.who blew himself up in a bombing near Mosul, and asks whether UK
:01:07. > :01:18.terror payouts went to the so-called The Guardian goes with the
:01:19. > :01:24.appointment of Cressida Dick, and Helen Bailey who was found dead
:01:25. > :01:26.alongside her dog. The I also features Cressida Dick's
:01:27. > :01:28.appointment and says she is already being criticised
:01:29. > :01:35.over her involvement And the Times has said that the data
:01:36. > :01:41.kingdom is wasting hundreds of millions subsidising power stations,
:01:42. > :01:42.burning pallets that do more harm to the environment than what they
:01:43. > :01:44.replace. The Express says a new jab
:01:45. > :01:46.could stop millions of people developing Type 2 diabetes and also
:01:47. > :02:00.speculates on whether And this is also the daily mirror.
:02:01. > :02:06.Also featuring that photograph of Cheryl. You do wonder... And a
:02:07. > :02:16.single mum has also won ?14 million. Good on her. One story dominating.
:02:17. > :02:24.That is terrorism. The question on the front page of the Daily
:02:25. > :02:33.Telegraph. Did UK terror pay outs go to Isil? Indeed. What happened at
:02:34. > :02:38.Iraq and thereafter. The money that was paid to this man is something
:02:39. > :02:44.that is going to be talked about for days. Newspapers are going to take a
:02:45. > :02:47.different tact, different angle. The Daily Telegraph looking at the money
:02:48. > :02:57.that was paid to him, and wondering if some of that was actually used to
:02:58. > :03:01.fund the activities of Isil. Other newspapers, my one included want to
:03:02. > :03:08.know why that was made. I think these are issues that are going to
:03:09. > :03:13.run in tandem. It is easy to say no. We know so much more about this
:03:14. > :03:20.particular character. But certainly are feeling, rulings that some of
:03:21. > :03:32.those from Guantanamo Bay were innocent. Shakily radicalised, lost
:03:33. > :03:40.their way. This is an example, I am afraid, and I cannot help being
:03:41. > :03:43.controversial and no doubt we're going to get some abuse on Twitter
:03:44. > :03:49.later but ultimately if somebody is not charged over criminal offence
:03:50. > :03:53.they cannot be convicted. Yes, National Security Agency and I think
:03:54. > :03:58.some measures could be taken that may or may not be ones that we would
:03:59. > :04:06.agree with day to day but ultimately if somebody has been badly treated
:04:07. > :04:12.on a circumstance that is what the courts rule. It is like seeing the
:04:13. > :04:19.Hugh and I wood badly interfaced appearance fees and go and do some
:04:20. > :04:25.illegal activity. It is nonsense. The idea of monitoring how he was
:04:26. > :04:28.going to spend the money, that is a secondary point. Why give him so
:04:29. > :04:33.much money in the first place. What were they trying to hide? I think
:04:34. > :04:39.people are good to look at why that payment was made. He was deemed to
:04:40. > :04:45.be innocent. Actually deemed to be for security. He was monitored.
:04:46. > :04:52.Nobody believed. It was a blemish. What it said was that they did not
:04:53. > :04:54.want to go to court, and have the intelligence operation and the
:04:55. > :05:01.mechanics of the intelligence operation discussed in open court. I
:05:02. > :05:05.smell a rat. The intelligence operations have been discussed in
:05:06. > :05:12.court cases, you have got ways of doing that with Camara hearings.
:05:13. > :05:16.This would not be the first time. The fact it was felt that in this
:05:17. > :05:20.case that could not be done, and instead they had to give him so much
:05:21. > :05:26.money, I think that tells you that they did not want to discuss what
:05:27. > :05:31.was done. Allegations about extraordinary renditions. It is a
:05:32. > :05:36.different point to what he did with the money. They should have watched
:05:37. > :05:42.him more closely. Legitimate argument. But the idea about what he
:05:43. > :05:48.was doing with his money, moot point. What are you doing with
:05:49. > :05:54.yours? Tony Blair's government lobbied for the release of
:05:55. > :06:00.Guantanamo Bay despite never regarding him as innocent. Something
:06:01. > :06:05.that Jack Straw has admitted. Again, why have they given him
:06:06. > :06:11.compensation? The argument was about the rule of law. Suspicions. Nothing
:06:12. > :06:16.proven about him. The detention at Guantanamo should not have happened.
:06:17. > :06:23.And they made that argument on the basis of the process. It is easy for
:06:24. > :06:32.us to see. We know what he has done after blowing himself up. Perhaps he
:06:33. > :06:36.was a terrorist all along. But he was living in Manchester for ten
:06:37. > :06:45.years. Tony Blair did not pay compensation. He has actually said
:06:46. > :06:53.that, but he has been out of power for ten years. The politics of years
:06:54. > :06:58.gone past, we have heard nothing and suddenly it is interesting that
:06:59. > :07:01.every single time something being discussed, we get more of Tony
:07:02. > :07:15.Blair. Connie suspicious but why is that? We will wait and see. Time
:07:16. > :07:25.will tell. The Metro. This is going to upset many commuters. It is an
:07:26. > :07:39.awful story. Did he kill his first wife? Referring to Ian Stewart.
:07:40. > :07:45.Killing Helen Bailey. The back story is that she was her first husband
:07:46. > :07:51.after a freak accident, she became lonely and went on to social media,
:07:52. > :07:55.talking to various people and he was one of them. Striking up a
:07:56. > :07:59.relationship. Seemed to be terribly happy with him and suddenly appears
:08:00. > :08:09.that all of the time he was planning to get rid of her and get her money.
:08:10. > :08:12.She killed her. Has it has just got so many elements that people are
:08:13. > :08:21.going to be interested in. Her celebrity, but also the sense of
:08:22. > :08:27.Midsummer models. She was planning the wedding, he was planning the
:08:28. > :08:31.murder. Facebook brought them together. So many interesting
:08:32. > :08:36.strands. But on the human level it is just a terribly sad story. And
:08:37. > :08:46.also looking into the death of his first wife. Going to re-examine
:08:47. > :08:52.that. Very sad. We can move to the Guardian. A lot of newspapers
:08:53. > :08:58.covering Cressida Dick, becoming the first woman to run the Metropolitan
:08:59. > :09:02.Police. I know that you were on Twitter. A lot of people upset that
:09:03. > :09:09.we keep mentioning that she is a woman. As the Guardian points out,
:09:10. > :09:16.she is a constable. Why is that such a big deal? If you are treating
:09:17. > :09:19.this, stop before you tweet. It is the first thing that a woman has
:09:20. > :09:25.been in charge of the Metropolitan Police. In the same way that Hillary
:09:26. > :09:29.Clinton would have been the first female president of the United
:09:30. > :09:35.States. Get over it. It is. It is not unique there. Woman are not very
:09:36. > :09:42.represented at the top as well as other groups. It is historic. People
:09:43. > :09:50.have pointed out that President Obama was the first black man, to be
:09:51. > :09:53.president of the united states. I wonder if people who tweet things
:09:54. > :09:58.like why are you mentioning if she is a woman, they have an issue that
:09:59. > :10:05.they are not wanting to admit to. It is clearly about equality. Not
:10:06. > :10:09.making such a big deal of this. It is a big deal. If you think about
:10:10. > :10:17.the organisation, policing has been a very male dominated, macho thing.
:10:18. > :10:23.The Metropolitan Police have had issues in the past, about treating
:10:24. > :10:28.female officers. And if they can get through the ranks, get a fair deal.
:10:29. > :10:32.So to have a woman in charge of that organisation is a significant
:10:33. > :10:41.advance. And when we have the stories it is important to stop,
:10:42. > :10:45.this is a big thing. Celebrate. Cressida Dick, nobody can deny the
:10:46. > :10:53.fact she has had an illustrious career. She rose through the ranks.
:10:54. > :10:58.I think she was Chief Superintendent at the time of the Jean Charles
:10:59. > :11:04.shooting. I am not sure. It could have been a promotion afterwards.
:11:05. > :11:11.But she was known as one of the gold commanders and was widely criticised
:11:12. > :11:17.for saying stop him. That was controversial because you have got
:11:18. > :11:22.so many interpretations of that. Very a marmite figure. Much some
:11:23. > :11:31.people loved her when she was in charge of Operation Trident, gun
:11:32. > :11:38.crime. By the same token, that expression, the rate man for the job
:11:39. > :11:42.can no longer apply. But looking to the future, a lot of hope that she
:11:43. > :11:49.can reform the Metropolitan Police, and tackle terrorism. Make not just
:11:50. > :11:54.London but the United Kingdom safer, and tackle racism. Absolutely.
:11:55. > :12:07.Nobody can look at the appointment and say it has been gun crime. --
:12:08. > :12:13.tokenism. She has done very significant things at Scotland Yard.
:12:14. > :12:19.Operation Trident, gun crime. Also counterterrorism units. She does
:12:20. > :12:22.have a big job because obviously the budget is going to be an important
:12:23. > :12:29.thing straightaway. The government is keen to keep the pot string
:12:30. > :12:33.state. But the Metropolitan Police have so many responsibilities, she
:12:34. > :12:38.has got to have the political nous to deal with that, while having
:12:39. > :12:46.credibility to keep the officers on her side. She is also continued ten
:12:47. > :12:57.a day to do a job. And we're not talking about cigarettes. The Times.
:12:58. > :13:08.A bigger bowl. Fruit and vegetables. How much do you eat? On none. Some,
:13:09. > :13:15.three. Sundays, but I am not going to have ten bananas. I would be in
:13:16. > :13:26.even worse shape. Ten grapes? That would be easy. Ten melons! Ten
:13:27. > :13:28.portions, scientists have said. Anybody wanting maximum protection
:13:29. > :13:40.against heart disease, cancer and early death should eat 800 grams.
:13:41. > :13:43.Double the government advice. It is difficult because they change the
:13:44. > :13:48.advice every so often. But we do need to think about what we eat. You
:13:49. > :13:55.think about the obesity crisis that we have. You eat several times a
:13:56. > :13:59.day, and if you exchange something fattening, is that a problem? They
:14:00. > :14:08.have sinned do not eat things like bottle. They change things.
:14:09. > :14:20.Recently, but is apparently fine. Then it is sugar. You have been
:14:21. > :14:27.reading too many of the stories. And the Daily Telegraph. Marmalade could
:14:28. > :14:35.be toast. Worried that we're not exposing our children to an offer
:14:36. > :14:43.that. National scandal. It said that young people are rejecting
:14:44. > :14:57.marmalade. No! Chocolate spread. Peanut butter. One percent aged
:14:58. > :15:10.under 28. Six out of ten, aged over 65. They have just as people and a
:15:11. > :15:16.sorry. If you have a really racy story on page number three, it was
:15:17. > :15:20.known as the marmalade dropper! Many thanks for taking us through that.
:15:21. > :15:26.We're going to do that again, the second round. Even more Twitter
:15:27. > :15:34.conversations. We will see you in a bit. That is it. We are going to be
:15:35. > :15:38.back later. You can see the front pages online, on the BBC News
:15:39. > :15:47.website. Seven days a week on the website. Thank you. We'll see you
:15:48. > :15:49.again in one