:00:15. > :00:16.Hello there. This is BBC News.
:00:17. > :00:19.We'll be taking a look at tomorrow mornings papers in a moment,
:00:20. > :00:27.says now is not the time for a leadership contest,
:00:28. > :00:34.but warns the party must do better at winning over voters.
:00:35. > :00:38.that he will not be attending the White House Correspondents
:00:39. > :00:47.A man has died and two other people injured
:00:48. > :00:49.after a man drove a car into pedestrians
:00:50. > :00:53.Three men have appeared in court on slavery charges
:00:54. > :00:55.after the discovery of a cannabis factory
:00:56. > :01:01.at a disused nuclear bunker in Wiltshire.
:01:02. > :01:03.And coming up at 10.45pm, a round-up of this week's
:01:04. > :01:24.best stories from across the globe in Reporters.
:01:25. > :01:27.So welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:01:28. > :01:32.the Political Editor of the Sunday Express,
:01:33. > :01:36.and Anne Ashworth, Assistant Editor at the Times.
:01:37. > :01:42.The Sunday Telegraph has an interview with
:01:43. > :01:43.the new independent reviewer of terrorism legislation,
:01:44. > :01:47.Max Hill who warns that the threat of terror attacks is at its highest
:01:48. > :01:53.Not so many newspapers are in just yet. These are the ones we have.
:01:54. > :01:55.Changes to visa regulations for migrants is the lead
:01:56. > :01:58.The paper says plans include limiting access to benefits
:01:59. > :02:04.The Sunday Express has more details about the man
:02:05. > :02:13.who murdered the children's author Helen Bailey.
:02:14. > :02:20.Let us begin with the Sunday Telegraph, interesting story about
:02:21. > :02:27.the Lords, really, and the "Brexit" Bill, saying the peers are uniting
:02:28. > :02:32.to soft "Brexit", to soften "Brexit", Theresa May may not like
:02:33. > :02:37.this. McIlroy she was hanging over their shoulders, imploring them to
:02:38. > :02:44.do the right thing, and available of the people. Unlike in the House of
:02:45. > :02:48.Commons, where there were not any amendments put forward to the bill,
:02:49. > :02:50.and it passed through the House of Commons, now there will be
:02:51. > :02:54.opportunities for peers to put down amendments and in fact they have,
:02:55. > :03:01.many of them, but the ones gaining the most support include one which
:03:02. > :03:04.promises to guarantee rights of EU citizens already living here, and
:03:05. > :03:10.also one which would give everyone in Parliament an opportunity to sort
:03:11. > :03:13.of vote on the final deal when it is done. And it's interesting because
:03:14. > :03:18.if you think about the composition of the House of Lords, they don't
:03:19. > :03:21.have the same issue of patronage that they do in the House of
:03:22. > :03:26.Commons, in that sense they are a lot more free to vote with their
:03:27. > :03:31.conscience. Indeed, many of them are now telling the Sunday Telegraph
:03:32. > :03:34.that they are going to put forward these amendments and vote for them,
:03:35. > :03:39.and that they are saying, basically, they feel this is such a big issue,
:03:40. > :03:42.that the timetable is too short for them to look at the issue and they
:03:43. > :03:47.want to be given the opportunity to make amendments and do the job they
:03:48. > :03:51.are there for. Some people have said, the British people voted on
:03:52. > :03:55.this, the House of Commons pushed this bill through without amendment,
:03:56. > :04:00.without change, how can it be that the unelected Lords should amend it?
:04:01. > :04:06.This is why there is going to be so much fuss about the intervention of
:04:07. > :04:10.the Lords into this. I think we are going to have a very exciting
:04:11. > :04:16.political battle. These people have little to lose, they can be the
:04:17. > :04:20.awkward squad, in this age of protest, that is the role that they
:04:21. > :04:25.can fulfil. I think there are a great many people who would have
:04:26. > :04:31.supported Brexit, but not necessarily hard Brexit, and those
:04:32. > :04:35.people want to see it done on terms. How we do this, how we except the EU
:04:36. > :04:39.will determine our political and economic life and it needs to be
:04:40. > :04:45.done carefully. Some of the issues that maybe we should have a second
:04:46. > :04:51.look at the final deal, before we sign, or whatever it is, to exit, is
:04:52. > :04:55.maybe they think that even some people who voted for Brexit will
:04:56. > :05:02.support. Gina Miller, businesswoman who brought the legal case that I
:05:03. > :05:07.was following at the Supreme Court, that ended with all of this being
:05:08. > :05:12.debated in parliament, she has said the Lords need to show some backbone
:05:13. > :05:16.on the "Brexit" Bill. In a sense you would expect this, she led the
:05:17. > :05:19.battle, as it were, through the courts, to make sure Parliament got
:05:20. > :05:24.a say on whether or not we trigger Article 50. That is now what the
:05:25. > :05:29.bill is going to be. Going through the Lords. In this piece to the
:05:30. > :05:33.Independent, she is imploring the Lords to do what she considers is
:05:34. > :05:38.their role, they are there as a revising chamber, as a scrutinising
:05:39. > :05:42.chamber, she is saying, basically the Prime Minister is being a bully,
:05:43. > :05:46.she is using the idea that she turned up, it is unusual for a Prime
:05:47. > :05:50.Minister to turn up at the House of Lords under those circumstances, you
:05:51. > :05:56.need to show your muscle now, if you are not happy with aspects of the
:05:57. > :06:03.bill, vote for the amendments. She is a bit survey heroine, Julia
:06:04. > :06:08.Miller, on investment charges, she did some good work into that, and
:06:09. > :06:13.there is the for her but this will be a massive battle, this is going
:06:14. > :06:19.to keep us going throughout March, April May, and beyond. Gina Miller,
:06:20. > :06:23.in the independent front page, you admire her, as the woman who brought
:06:24. > :06:29.this case, she came in for a lot of stick from certain quarters? She has
:06:30. > :06:33.had a lot of stick, a lot of people will say into response what she did,
:06:34. > :06:38.the public had their say, they were very clear, they voted for "Brexit"
:06:39. > :06:43.and the idea that it has to be brought back before Parliament is
:06:44. > :06:46.kind of unnecessary, because it is almost a hurdle that is not
:06:47. > :06:51.warranted, given that people had their direct say. Yes, she is
:06:52. > :06:55.clearly standing up for principles she thinks are very important, she
:06:56. > :07:00.thinks that this is something that she must do, and the fact she went
:07:01. > :07:02.to such lengths to do it, whether you are on either side of the
:07:03. > :07:07."Brexit" fans, you have got to admire her for doing it, it has not
:07:08. > :07:11.been an easy thing to do, I am sure that she has suffered. She has faced
:07:12. > :07:18.down the most extraordinary social media torrent... Death threats, in
:07:19. > :07:24.fact. She cannot go safely to a public place, she has been told,
:07:25. > :07:28.that shows the depth of emotion. Nigel Farage, on the opposite side
:07:29. > :07:33.of the fence, he says the same thing, he says he is vilified in the
:07:34. > :07:38.same way she has been. Cannot go out of the house for fear of the liberal
:07:39. > :07:44.press, that is the phrase! Still on the "Brexit" story, Tim Shipman,
:07:45. > :07:49.political editor, here, talking about there is going to be a Visa
:07:50. > :07:54.revolution for foreign workers, that is his angle on at. Yes, migration
:07:55. > :07:58.is never far away from agenda when we talk about "Brexit", lots of
:07:59. > :08:03.people say that was the main people Racing people were rejecting when
:08:04. > :08:07.they voted for "Brexit", that they wanted to have control on who comes
:08:08. > :08:11.into the country. Of course this week we saw David Davis admitting
:08:12. > :08:15.that it was going to take some time for us to bring down the level of
:08:16. > :08:20.migration that we already have. This is suggesting that it will be sector
:08:21. > :08:24.by sector arrangements for migration which is something we have heard
:08:25. > :08:28.before. But there will also be new arrangements in terms of benefits
:08:29. > :08:32.and restricting benefits for new arrivals. This was also something
:08:33. > :08:36.David Cameron had started prior to the referendum. The most interesting
:08:37. > :08:40.bit of this article is actually about what we do with the people
:08:41. > :08:44.that are already here, the people that have come here from Europe,
:08:45. > :08:48.living here, settled here, working, and what it is suggesting is that
:08:49. > :08:52.actually, there will be a cut-off date, and many people thought it
:08:53. > :08:57.might have been June 23, it seems that the lawyers have suggested this
:08:58. > :09:00.is not lawful, and actually, the date that we trigger Article 50,
:09:01. > :09:10.which Tim Shipman seems to think will be March 15, that is on the
:09:11. > :09:13.cards. Not far away. That will be the day, after that point, people
:09:14. > :09:18.who come in will not have their rights guaranteed. It is very
:09:19. > :09:21.interesting, how the rights of migrants and who can stay and who
:09:22. > :09:25.cannot, and who can stay in the future, is going up the agenda, the
:09:26. > :09:28.trade deals have suddenly been shoved into the background, and
:09:29. > :09:35.there is a kind of consternation as to wondering how we will do with all
:09:36. > :09:40.these workers... How will we get on without them? A few of the other
:09:41. > :09:44.stories? The Sunday Times have the Labour Party and the fallout from
:09:45. > :09:48.the Labour Party by-elections, the deputy leader, Tom Watson, saying
:09:49. > :09:52.that they risk their wipe-out in England as they had in Scotland and
:09:53. > :09:56.is they take a long hard look at the way that they have alienated
:09:57. > :09:59.traditional supporters of the party. What will they actually do about it,
:10:00. > :10:02.and awful lot of public hand-wringing on the part of the
:10:03. > :10:07.Labour Party members but they do not seem to be able to get rid of Jeremy
:10:08. > :10:11.Corbyn. I would love to know what Tom Watson has privately told Jeremy
:10:12. > :10:15.Corbyn about, time for you to go, or has he? The Labour moderates, when
:10:16. > :10:20.you speak with them, you ask if there is a plan, and they look at
:10:21. > :10:25.you like mournfully and say, there simply is not a plan. From Labour to
:10:26. > :10:33.Ukip, and we have the express, who say that, the Sunday Express, they
:10:34. > :10:37.say Nigel and I, Nigel Farage and Arron Banks, are fed up with
:10:38. > :10:43.Ukip...? This is one of my stories... Yes, yes it is! I hadn't
:10:44. > :10:50.spotted that! What a brilliant story! Sunday Express! Had a chat
:10:51. > :10:53.with errant banks, in the wake of the Stoke by-election, -- Arron
:10:54. > :11:00.Banks, Paul Nuttall, leader of the party, unsuccessful in his attempts
:11:01. > :11:04.to be elected as the party's second MP, he says he will quit and take
:11:05. > :11:07.his minions and not be part of Ukip unless they let him become chairman
:11:08. > :11:11.of the party so that they can professionalise and modernise the
:11:12. > :11:15.party and move forward with it. He has a bit of a beef with Douglas
:11:16. > :11:19.Carswell, as we have known for a long time, and this issue that aired
:11:20. > :11:23.on question Time about whether or not Douglas Carswell indeed blocks
:11:24. > :11:28.Nigel Farage's knighthood, has reared its ugly head again, and
:11:29. > :11:35.Arron Banks told me that if he becomes chairman, then his first act
:11:36. > :11:39.will be to expel Douglas Carswell. It's all bitter infighting again.
:11:40. > :11:45.Certainly is. Sunday Telegraph, they have written's new terror chief...
:11:46. > :11:50.Max Hill, talking about Islamic State and the threat of terror being
:11:51. > :11:57.the worst for a generation, his first interview since being
:11:58. > :12:01.appointed. The independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, the man
:12:02. > :12:05.who looks essentially to see whether the people who are keeping us safe
:12:06. > :12:13.will be able to do this, and he is talking about a level of terror
:12:14. > :12:19.threat akin to that in the 1970s, 1974, at the height of the IRA
:12:20. > :12:23.bombing. Maybe this is maybe not a surprise to some people but it is a
:12:24. > :12:30.rather sobering report on just the level of threat from Isis, and also,
:12:31. > :12:36.the age at which people are becoming radicalised, the age of 14, people
:12:37. > :12:44.are watching Isil videos and signing up, trying to leave Britain... To
:12:45. > :12:48.join up... Terrorism has been on the agenda, the story about the man who
:12:49. > :12:53.came back from Guantanamo Bay, living here for ten years, and then
:12:54. > :12:57.escaped to Syria and was blown up in a suicide bomb attack in Iraq. The
:12:58. > :13:03.thing I would like to know from him, because it crossed my mind, what is
:13:04. > :13:07.going to do in terms of the surveillance powers of these people
:13:08. > :13:11.slipping in and out of the country. Very quick, last look at the
:13:12. > :13:16.Telegraph, Emma Stone, picture of her, just ahead of the Oscars, hot
:13:17. > :13:21.favourite to be best actress. La La Land. You saw it and did not like
:13:22. > :13:29.it? I am that person who did not like it, Hollywood did because it is
:13:30. > :13:30.a love song to Hollywood, to how beautiful California is...
:13:31. > :13:36.Everything that Hollywood stands for. So one would imagine that it
:13:37. > :13:43.would do incredibly well, but it would not get my vote, maybe I am
:13:44. > :13:47.just not enough of a romantic. Caroline, great filmgoer? I wish I
:13:48. > :13:50.could be but having three children, this is my idea of a great night
:13:51. > :13:55.out! LAUGHTER The papers, better than the movies,
:13:56. > :14:04.perhaps we can get an Oscar! LAUGHTER
:14:05. > :14:10.We will be back at 11:30pm, for another look at the stories making
:14:11. > :14:13.the news. Coming up next on the BBC news channel, it is Reporters.