:00:07. > :00:18.We'll be taking a look at tomorrow morning's papers in a moment.
:00:19. > :00:23.First, the headlines: Labour's deputy leader Tom Watson says now
:00:24. > :00:26.is not the time for a leadership contest, but warns the party must do
:00:27. > :00:35.President Trump announces he will not be attending
:00:36. > :00:37.the White House Correspondents dinner this year.
:00:38. > :00:41.A man has died and two other people injured after a man drove a car
:00:42. > :00:44.into pedestrians in the German city of Heidelberg.
:00:45. > :00:46.Three men have appeared in court on slavery charges
:00:47. > :00:49.after the discovery of a cannabis factory at a disused nuclear
:00:50. > :01:00.And coming up after the Papers, we'll get Jason Solomon's take
:01:01. > :01:02.on Patriot's Day, the Hollywood blockbuster based on the Boston
:01:03. > :01:23.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be
:01:24. > :01:28.With me are Caroline Wheeler, the political editor
:01:29. > :01:31.of the Sunday Express, and Anne Ashworth, assistant editor
:01:32. > :01:39.Let's take a look at the front pages that have arrived
:01:40. > :01:42.The Sunday Telegraph has an interview with
:01:43. > :01:43.the new independent reviewer of terrorism
:01:44. > :01:49.That's Max Hill, who warns that the threat of terror attacks
:01:50. > :01:53.In the Sunday Times - changes to visa regulations
:01:54. > :01:57.The paper says plans include limiting access to benefits
:01:58. > :02:05.The Sunday Express has more details about the man who murdered
:02:06. > :02:21.Kicking off with the Telegraph and the story about Brexit, Lord uniting
:02:22. > :02:25.potentially to soften Brexit. That will pause consternation for some
:02:26. > :02:30.people? Of course. It seems like this has been going on for ages,
:02:31. > :02:34.these debates around Brexit, and we still haven't triggered Article 50,
:02:35. > :02:39.the formal mechanism by which we leave the European Union. The
:02:40. > :02:42.withdrawal from the EU bill has already been driven House of
:02:43. > :02:46.Commons, it went through unamended and is now going through the House
:02:47. > :02:51.of Lords, where the relationship is different and the arrangements about
:02:52. > :02:57.patronage, they will get voted out if they don't follow the will of the
:02:58. > :03:01.people as it were. It doesn't quite apply to the House of Lords, so of
:03:02. > :03:05.course they are little bit freer to tinker with the legislation. They
:03:06. > :03:10.have put through a raft of amendments. One of them concerns the
:03:11. > :03:17.rights of Europeans over here and one is about having a vote on the
:03:18. > :03:21.entire deal once we get there. These are the things the Telegraph is
:03:22. > :03:24.telling us there will be some cross-party support for as they try
:03:25. > :03:31.to have their influence over the bill. They are free to tinker, but
:03:32. > :03:35.at the same time they have to be careful because this is a referendum
:03:36. > :03:38.with a huge exercise in democracy. The House of Commons pass the bill
:03:39. > :03:43.without change? You might say they have to be careful, but I don't
:03:44. > :03:48.think they are minded to be. They are almost becoming like an
:03:49. > :03:54.opposition party. They will be asking questions about migrants'
:03:55. > :03:58.writes, about the very fine detail and under exactly what terms the
:03:59. > :04:06.exit. I think it will be a very interesting process. Is that
:04:07. > :04:13.democratic? They are there to review legislation and they see that as
:04:14. > :04:19.being difficult in this crucial piece of legislation. They see that
:04:20. > :04:22.as their role. Whether they have any great success with this is still
:04:23. > :04:27.very much up for debate. There will be this process of ping-pong with a
:04:28. > :04:31.meant legislation and it will then be cast again by MPs, who will
:04:32. > :04:35.reject it, as they did beforehand, and of course the whole intrigue
:04:36. > :04:40.around this is that it will affect the timing of triggering Article 50.
:04:41. > :04:45.We have to get this bill passed before we get Article 50 enacted and
:04:46. > :04:49.it was suggested that good we done as early as March the ninth, the
:04:50. > :04:54.suggestion is now that it will be pushed later, possibly towards March
:04:55. > :04:58.17. You wonder what Theresa May will think about that. She was there at
:04:59. > :05:04.the beginning of the debate in the lords, looking at the peers as they
:05:05. > :05:08.were debating it. Now of course Jean Miller, the businesswoman in the
:05:09. > :05:14.Independent's front page. She is pictured and the Independent say
:05:15. > :05:19.that she says the lords need to show backbone on the Brexit bill. She was
:05:20. > :05:25.the woman who of course brought the original legal case, which then went
:05:26. > :05:28.to the Supreme Court, that the parliament had to debate this and
:05:29. > :05:31.pass this legislation. An extraordinaire woman in her own way
:05:32. > :05:35.who has put herself into the limelight and received a huge
:05:36. > :05:40.torrent of abuse over it, over her questioning of Brexit. She has once
:05:41. > :05:47.more in merged to say that the lords must do their job. She sees it very
:05:48. > :05:53.much as their role to be the irritant in this process. She is a
:05:54. > :05:57.Marmite person. People are very divided about her, but on a lot of
:05:58. > :06:03.people who really admire her for the Percat Henning on the amount we pay
:06:04. > :06:13.for pensions. -- for all of the things she has done. People on both
:06:14. > :06:17.sides of the debate. Nigel Farage says he can't go to the pub any more
:06:18. > :06:22.because he gets a torrent of abuse when he goes out. But she is an
:06:23. > :06:27.interesting figure because it takes an enormous amount of courage I
:06:28. > :06:31.think on an issue as divisive as the one we've just seen in terms of the
:06:32. > :06:35.referendum to actually then take up the mantle and take this to the High
:06:36. > :06:44.Court. Then of course the government took it to the High Court. So a
:06:45. > :06:48.great deal of courage. In many ways what she is saying is what we would
:06:49. > :06:55.expect it to say. She is going to the lords to try to soften Brexit
:06:56. > :07:00.and she sees the Prime Minister... Cheesy turning up in House of Lords
:07:01. > :07:07.as somehow being a bully, breathing down their next. It will be
:07:08. > :07:11.increasingly divisive. A quick look at the Sunday Times. They've got
:07:12. > :07:19.another angle on the whole Brexit story. A story about an offence from
:07:20. > :07:23.migrants and of this revolution. An interesting story that we just
:07:24. > :07:27.seeing. Trade deals on the sidelines. What we are talking about
:07:28. > :07:33.is the right to migrants, both those who might come in the future and
:07:34. > :07:37.those who are already here, but we think this is most interesting for a
:07:38. > :07:42.very interesting date. Is the cut-off date at which you can stay
:07:43. > :07:48.here, if you are an EU migrant, the date of the referendum, or is it the
:07:49. > :07:53.date on which we trigger Article 50? I think this is going to be a cause
:07:54. > :07:58.of huge dispute. This particular article suggests that the lawyers
:07:59. > :08:02.have looked at this and what they are saying is that it could be the
:08:03. > :08:05.date that we trickle Article 50. Which could be a couple of weeks
:08:06. > :08:11.away. Exactly. Much to be determined. If everything goes well.
:08:12. > :08:14.Another story is about the Labour Party, which we have been discussing
:08:15. > :08:22.since the fallout from the by-elections. Tom Watson, the deputy
:08:23. > :08:27.leader, suggesting they could face wipeout in England as they have done
:08:28. > :08:32.Scotland. Yes, the analysis, if you look at the level of swing we saw in
:08:33. > :08:37.Koh plant, would suggest scores of Labour seats under threat. --
:08:38. > :08:40.Copeland. Who will naturally be pooling their resources together. It
:08:41. > :08:43.is interesting to see how Theresa May discussed the idea of the
:08:44. > :08:53.Conservative Party now be the workers party. The Conservatives are
:08:54. > :08:56.very much trying to... This is a major concern to those in the party
:08:57. > :09:01.at the moment, especially the moderates who don't see any way out
:09:02. > :09:08.of this. There is no kind of white knights charging to their rescue,
:09:09. > :09:12.that anyone can see. Nobody really thinks that any candidate other than
:09:13. > :09:16.another from the left will actually win out, should there be another
:09:17. > :09:22.leadership contest. If David Miliband going to enter the fray?
:09:23. > :09:26.Very big comment in my paper this morning, this is the darkest time he
:09:27. > :09:31.has seen the Labour and he sees it as impossible. Will Tony Blair come
:09:32. > :09:39.back? That's been another one around the fringes. Come back to rescue the
:09:40. > :09:44.party. But with the party elect David Miliband? It would depend. The
:09:45. > :09:48.interesting thing about this is the reason they want to Jeremy Corbyn to
:09:49. > :09:52.hang around is because there is more change they want to instigate in
:09:53. > :09:55.September, which is the John McDonnell rule, which will mean they
:09:56. > :09:58.don't have to reach such a high threshold in order to get another
:09:59. > :10:05.left-winger onto the ballot paper. Quick word. You got a story in the
:10:06. > :10:09.Express. You have the summit up about Ukip. There were two
:10:10. > :10:16.by-elections. The fallout from Labour. Paul Nuttall obviously
:10:17. > :10:21.didn't win the seat of Stoke and basically party's biggest donor will
:10:22. > :10:25.issue an ultimatum and say, there could be chairman, that's me
:10:26. > :10:30.modernise the parties we can become electable and if you don't do that I
:10:31. > :10:37.will set up a rival party that will basically destroy Ukip. He has set
:10:38. > :10:42.up a rival log. But would he actually like to be Prime Minister?
:10:43. > :10:52.Does he see himself as the leader of Ukip? And the Sunday Telegraph. The
:10:53. > :10:55.terrorism chief, as they call him, talking about the threat of terror,
:10:56. > :11:02.the worst in a generation. This is an extraordinary story. Max Hill,
:11:03. > :11:06.the new independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, the man who
:11:07. > :11:10.keeps an eye on the people who keep us safe. He has said that the
:11:11. > :11:16.terrorist threat is at its worst since the 1970s. Now, you might
:11:17. > :11:23.expect him to say that he has a serious job and a great deal to do,
:11:24. > :11:27.but it's a very, very sobering tale. However, there are lots of things
:11:28. > :11:31.that they don't seem to ask him in the story. One of the things I would
:11:32. > :11:36.have liked to have heard from this interview is what about all of the
:11:37. > :11:40.Isis fighters who have returned to Britain? The people who have been
:11:41. > :11:44.radicalised and returned? Is he going to be keeping a special eye on
:11:45. > :11:49.them? Does he want new measures, new surveillance techniques? It is
:11:50. > :11:53.interesting you should say that. One of the things I was saying before is
:11:54. > :11:56.the reason terror is back on the agenda is because of the death of
:11:57. > :12:02.the Guantanamo Bay detainee who had gone out and blew himself up in
:12:03. > :12:06.Iraq. Of course I would have wanted him to talk more about surveillance
:12:07. > :12:10.and what we are doing to make sure people don't give out of the country
:12:11. > :12:13.when they have been a cause for concern. But from your point, the
:12:14. > :12:16.thing that alarms me is that actually he talks about reviewing
:12:17. > :12:22.terrorism prevention and investigation measures, which are
:12:23. > :12:25.the most Draconian, although not as Draconian as the control orders,
:12:26. > :12:30.because he thinks they are an extraordinarily serious infringement
:12:31. > :12:34.on freedom. He seems to feel he will go the other way and actually look
:12:35. > :12:38.at Civil Liberties, rather than looking at the angle of these people
:12:39. > :12:42.posing a grave threat to us and what we can do to keep us safe. A quick
:12:43. > :12:48.look at the Sunday Telegraph. The Oscars. La la land is tipped to
:12:49. > :12:54.sweep the board. The picture of Emma Stone, the hot favourite to be named
:12:55. > :12:59.best dress. You went to see it and you didn't like it? I didn't like
:13:00. > :13:03.it, but I think the interest will be in what sort of level of virtue
:13:04. > :13:09.signalling we see from the stars. How many impassioned anti-Trump
:13:10. > :13:14.speeches will we see? Usually I can get really focused on the frocks.
:13:15. > :13:17.That's what really interests me. But I will be wondering how beautifully
:13:18. > :13:22.choreographed and scripted all of these impassioned, seemingly
:13:23. > :13:27.off-the-cuff, speeches are. But, no, I didn't enjoy La La Land, but it's
:13:28. > :13:31.a Hollywood film. There will be frocks and politics tomorrow. There
:13:32. > :13:36.will be. We've seen a bit of that already. We've seen some protest
:13:37. > :13:40.today with the likes of Michael J Fox and Jodie Kidd making speeches
:13:41. > :13:44.about Trump. That will be a feature of the Oscars tomorrow. They will
:13:45. > :13:48.probably be looking at the frocks. I don't get to go to the movies very
:13:49. > :13:53.often. You haven't seen anything for ages, have you? No, very
:13:54. > :13:58.disappointed. As I was saying, this is the best night out at had in
:13:59. > :14:01.ages! Thanks very much. That's it for The Papers. Coming up next, The
:14:02. > :14:06.Film Review.