:00:00. > :00:22.of a sense of people coming together after the Brexit vote.
:00:23. > :00:25.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be
:00:26. > :00:28.With me are John Crowley, who is editor-in-chief
:00:29. > :00:31.at the International Business Times, and Tim Stanley, the leader writer
:00:32. > :00:33.and columnist for the Daily Telegraph.
:00:34. > :00:36.Let's have a quick look at some of the front pages
:00:37. > :00:40.The Telegraph has an interview with Prince Harry, who talks
:00:41. > :00:42.about how he sought counselling to cope with the death
:00:43. > :00:47.The Guardian reports on the vote in Turkey giving President Erdogan
:00:48. > :00:48.the power for major constitutional reform.
:00:49. > :00:51.The Times leads with North Korean defiance in the face of pressure
:00:52. > :00:55.The i also leads with the tension in North Korea,
:00:56. > :00:57.reporting that China and America are working together
:00:58. > :01:01.The Mirror reports on President Trump's message that he is poised
:01:02. > :01:07.They say that the Americans caused the North Korean missile
:01:08. > :01:11.The Mail lead with the deterioration in UK Russia relations,
:01:12. > :01:16.And The FT focus on US commerce secretary Wilbur Ross,
:01:17. > :01:33.rubbishing International Monetary Fund claims of US protectionism.
:01:34. > :01:39.Many of the stories we have been reporting on today feature on the
:01:40. > :01:43.front pages, but we start with an exclusive in the Daily Telegraph, an
:01:44. > :01:47.interview with Vince Harry talking about how he has coped with the
:01:48. > :01:52.death of his mother. It was 20 years of not thinking about it, he said,
:01:53. > :01:58.and to make use of total chaos. A very, very frank, no holds barred
:01:59. > :02:05.interview that the Daily Telegraph has managed to secure. Our columnist
:02:06. > :02:08.has a new pod cast in which she talks to famous people about their
:02:09. > :02:13.mental health, and their first guest is, amazingly, Prince Harry, who has
:02:14. > :02:17.talked in this very unfiltered, honest, dramatic way about the
:02:18. > :02:21.anguish and the grief over his mother's death. It won't surprise
:02:22. > :02:26.anyone to know that he has been struggling with this. He lost his
:02:27. > :02:31.mum when he was 12 years old, and he has had to deal with that, and live
:02:32. > :02:36.with that, in the public eye. What really is astonishing, what makes
:02:37. > :02:40.the interview historic, is a member of the Royal Family talking in such
:02:41. > :02:45.a candidate and frank matter about so private a subject. He goes on to
:02:46. > :02:50.say later in the article, on the front page, which advertises the
:02:51. > :02:53.piece that he has done, the experience I have is that once you
:02:54. > :02:57.start talking about it, you realise that you are actually part of a big
:02:58. > :03:02.club. But it is that silence, isn't it, that people feel unable to share
:03:03. > :03:07.with each other. The trauma, the upset, the grief that they have gone
:03:08. > :03:11.through. Mental health issues are... It is still the boot, I think. But I
:03:12. > :03:17.think this historic interview will go massively fire to breaking down
:03:18. > :03:23.those issues that people have about talking about it, as well -- taboo.
:03:24. > :03:30.It is immensely brave, and he is using an princely language, using
:03:31. > :03:36.very visceral, human terms -- unprincely. He said he wanted to
:03:37. > :03:42.punch someone out, all the time. And you look at him now, I think, in a
:03:43. > :03:47.completely different light than before, when he made this interview.
:03:48. > :03:50.He is very much his mother's son. You are saying in the first part of
:03:51. > :03:54.this programme that it was reminiscent of his mother's frank
:03:55. > :04:01.interview about the divorce. It is also reminiscent to me of his mother
:04:02. > :04:04.reaching out to AIDS victims, a willingness to go somewhere where
:04:05. > :04:07.everyone is a little bit uncomfortable, the media, the
:04:08. > :04:13.establishment unwilling to break it to do, crossed a line, and talk
:04:14. > :04:21.frankly, without any elitism whatsoever -- breaker taboo. Being
:04:22. > :04:29.willing to go there and talk about it, in the same way she did with
:04:30. > :04:33.AIDS. How much of risk it that he has done this interview? I don't
:04:34. > :04:36.think this is a risk at all. I think people will praise him for his
:04:37. > :04:41.bravery in speaking about this. We were talking offset about whether
:04:42. > :04:45.Clarence House had seen this or not. Remember, he is moving into a new
:04:46. > :04:51.phase of his life, he has a girlfriend, but in November he spoke
:04:52. > :04:55.out quite extensively about media intrusion into his partner's
:04:56. > :04:59.personal life as well. It was said at the time that it didn't seem to
:05:00. > :05:02.have gone through Clarence House. There were a few ruffled feathers
:05:03. > :05:09.about how he had gone out an attack the media, and I wonder, with this
:05:10. > :05:12.interview, whether maybe he was shooting from the hit a little bit
:05:13. > :05:20.himself. So maybe there is that question about, wow, you have spoken
:05:21. > :05:24.so rawly about this, but I can't see any downside for him. He will get
:05:25. > :05:29.praised for this. You can't really do an interview on the subject, can
:05:30. > :05:34.you, without laying it all out? Absolutely. I guess if there is any
:05:35. > :05:37.risk, it is not about anyone thinking less of him for talking
:05:38. > :05:41.about the subject, if there is any risk it could be that some less
:05:42. > :05:45.scrupulous people in the press will take the view that he has opened
:05:46. > :05:49.himself up, so that invites us to go looking for more. I hope they won't.
:05:50. > :05:54.I don't think they will, because this feels so rave, so courageous,
:05:55. > :06:00.to almost go naked like this into the public with your deepest, rawest
:06:01. > :06:03.emotions, I think almost everyone will be touched by it and will
:06:04. > :06:11.respect it. Don't forget, it is about promoting his charity as well.
:06:12. > :06:15.He wants people to support Heads Together. It is not just someone
:06:16. > :06:19.talking about their private problems publicly. He clearly wants to send a
:06:20. > :06:25.message that people can and should talk about it, and even this great
:06:26. > :06:29.public figure is talking about it. In the Daily Mail, UK relations with
:06:30. > :06:36.Russia are at an all-time low. This is Moscow's ambassador in London.
:06:37. > :06:42.Saying that Number Ten has been raising tensions in Europe. How?
:06:43. > :06:48.Well, very undiplomatic language, taking a pop at Boris Johnson, who
:06:49. > :06:52.has perhaps had as a weeks. He presented his idea to the G7 that
:06:53. > :06:57.there should be new sanctions on Russia, which was rejected. He was
:06:58. > :07:05.also due to go to Moscow and cancelled his visit because Rex
:07:06. > :07:09.Tillerson, the US Secretary of State, wanted to go there as well.
:07:10. > :07:20.Very undiplomatic language for the UK to be using. Thinking of the
:07:21. > :07:26.Cambridge spy ring, Alexander Litvinenko, there have been bad
:07:27. > :07:30.moments. In the 1850s we were at war, but you can't get much worse
:07:31. > :07:34.than that. There is an interesting thing about the Putin regime, a
:07:35. > :07:39.willingness to use undiplomatic language, and even, as we were
:07:40. > :07:42.saying earlier, to troll people. The Russian embassy Twitter account
:07:43. > :07:47.sometimes goes after personalities and teases and trolls them. It fits
:07:48. > :07:51.in with that picture. Our relations at an all-time low? Well, the
:07:52. > :07:56.context of this is Britain sending troops to Estonia to put down a
:07:57. > :08:00.marker, along with NATO, to say we will not accept Russian aggression
:08:01. > :08:05.or revanchist when it comes to the Baltic countries. Our things at an
:08:06. > :08:10.all-time low? No. And there is more stuff that Britain could do if it
:08:11. > :08:14.wanted to send a message. This country as a source of enormous
:08:15. > :08:18.wealth for the Russians. There is a lot of investment, a lot of buying
:08:19. > :08:20.of property, a lot of money which goes through London, and any
:08:21. > :08:24.government which really wanted to punish the Russians could start
:08:25. > :08:30.addressing that. If the Russians think things are bad, it could get a
:08:31. > :08:35.whole lot worse. We will go to the Guardian. Calls for a recount as
:08:36. > :08:39.Erdogan claims new power in Turkey. The opposition are not repaired to
:08:40. > :08:44.concede they have lost, they want something like 60% of the votes to
:08:45. > :08:47.be recounted, looking for irregularities. It seems that some
:08:48. > :08:51.of the ballots did not have the official stamp on it. You can
:08:52. > :08:57.understand why the opposition... Every opposition says this, so it is
:08:58. > :09:00.understandable, and the result was very narrow, and therefore they are
:09:01. > :09:04.more inclined to challenge it because it could make a difference,
:09:05. > :09:09.but also this is a leader who has been arresting journalists, jurors,
:09:10. > :09:17.people who are dissidents, in other words, why would you trust him, if
:09:18. > :09:20.he is the state, to efficiently and accurately and fairly run an
:09:21. > :09:29.election? It is entirely understandable they are protesting.
:09:30. > :09:33.Of course, it puts Erdogan in a very difficult position. He has just been
:09:34. > :09:41.given the tools to use great power, but on the other hand because the
:09:42. > :09:45.country is so divided, if he is wise he will not use that great power. It
:09:46. > :09:50.is the worst possible outcome for Turkey, and he very deliberately
:09:51. > :09:56.used very strong man terms during the election campaign, a very bitter
:09:57. > :10:03.and rancorous election campaign, quite an emotive speech he gave
:10:04. > :10:07.afterwards. Saying that he wants eventually to bring back the death
:10:08. > :10:10.penalty, so then you have international bodies saying, be very
:10:11. > :10:19.cautious about how you proceed. And of course, with the EU, Turkey has
:10:20. > :10:23.long dreamt of joining the EU. You now have a strong man in power, do
:10:24. > :10:28.have a benign dictatorship or not a benign dictatorship on the borders
:10:29. > :10:32.of the EU? How does that impact on things, and how will the EU react to
:10:33. > :10:36.this as well? Tomorrow, bear in mind they have been giving 3 billion
:10:37. > :10:43.euros a year to solve that slight migrant issue we have going on in
:10:44. > :10:47.Greece as well. So it actually adds more uncertainty, this election. The
:10:48. > :10:51.rubberstamp the needed did not come. He thought he would get 55%. He
:10:52. > :11:00.didn't get it -- the rubberstamp he needed. And the government tries to
:11:01. > :11:04.block Iraq War case against Blair. It is a private prosecution. It is a
:11:05. > :11:09.private prosecution, the former chief of staff of the Iraqi army is
:11:10. > :11:14.trying to bring this. This is on the back of the Chilcott enquiry, which
:11:15. > :11:18.we all know about, which was published last year. Jeremy Wright
:11:19. > :11:22.QC, the attorney general, has said there are a number of reasons that
:11:23. > :11:26.can't be done. It is quite involved legalese, he has said you can't have
:11:27. > :11:33.aggression under English law, that courts should not rule to create
:11:34. > :11:37.criminal law, they should interpret the law. But again, we are talking
:11:38. > :11:43.about whether we are going to get involved in various disputes around
:11:44. > :11:47.the world. Of course, Iraq for many people still looms large in some
:11:48. > :11:51.people may say can we move on? I think if we did a poll of the
:11:52. > :11:55.audience and said should Tony Blair be prosecuted, it would be very
:11:56. > :12:02.interesting to see what they thought. He is not a popular man in
:12:03. > :12:07.this country, it is fair to say. The legal process still continues for
:12:08. > :12:12.certain people. Interesting to see the government intervened to try to
:12:13. > :12:15.quash this. It looks as though the private prosecution doesn't have a
:12:16. > :12:22.leg to stand on because he has effectively already been granted
:12:23. > :12:26.immunity, and there was a private prosecution -- if there was a
:12:27. > :12:29.private prosecution, stuff under the Official Secrets Act would be
:12:30. > :12:34.dredged up. Do people want to move on? I don't know. On the one hand
:12:35. > :12:37.Iraq was an enormous shock to the country, and it is something we are
:12:38. > :12:41.still living with the consequences. It still informs our foreign policy,
:12:42. > :12:46.it is one reason we didn't get directly involved with bringing down
:12:47. > :12:51.Assad in 2013. On the other hand, do we need to draw a line and move on?
:12:52. > :13:01.I am not so sure. You could put Tony Blair on trial, and that would give
:13:02. > :13:04.some people some sense of satisfaction, to see the past
:13:05. > :13:08.properly prosecuted. On the other hand, you might also feel it gives
:13:09. > :13:11.Tony Blair more oxygen and continues to keep him as a player within our
:13:12. > :13:15.political system. Which by the way he continues to want to be, he has
:13:16. > :13:23.announced his political comeback. Finishing with the Sun, Mission
:13:24. > :13:27.Kimpossible. US cyber spooks destroyed missile five seconds after
:13:28. > :13:34.launch, some intervention, the Sun would have us believe. Sir Malcolm
:13:35. > :13:37.Rifkind believes there is a possibility, that the US has the
:13:38. > :13:41.capability to interrupt a nuclear test like this, and it is possible,
:13:42. > :13:46.who knows, but that might have happened again. It is a fantastic
:13:47. > :13:49.headline and in some ways it is slightly irrelevant. The point is
:13:50. > :13:53.that it failed, and what matters more is what America and China
:13:54. > :13:58.between the two of them are going to do about it. Does it matter that it
:13:59. > :14:03.failed? If you didn't fail under its own uselessness, they couldn't fire
:14:04. > :14:10.their own test missile, and it had to be intercepted. Incompetency, or
:14:11. > :14:16.something worse, I don't know. The US has said it it had been a nuclear
:14:17. > :14:20.test then I think Trump would have taken action. I think that is the
:14:21. > :14:25.more important point. And that would have been an extra red line for
:14:26. > :14:29.China. Precisely. It would be an act of incompetence if your system could
:14:30. > :14:34.be hacked. So in that sense it is incompetent regardless of whether it
:14:35. > :14:37.took place or not. North Korea is probably already in effect a nuclear
:14:38. > :14:44.state. The issue is its ability to deliver them weapons. And one reason
:14:45. > :14:51.America has to act is not just being bellicose, this is a National
:14:52. > :14:55.Security issue. If North Korea can probably deliver a nuclear weapon
:14:56. > :15:00.across the Pacific Ocean and strike the West Coast, or Alaska or Hawaii,
:15:01. > :15:06.then it becomes a national security matter. And we have Mike Pence in
:15:07. > :15:10.the region trying to reassure North Korea's neighbours. Which was
:15:11. > :15:13.preplanned. We should make it clear that he didn't just decide to
:15:14. > :15:19.parachute himself in. We were talking earlier, and China is the
:15:20. > :15:21.big issue. What is their role in this, and how do they played? China
:15:22. > :15:26.has supported North Korea economically in terms of its energy
:15:27. > :15:36.resources, in terms of its food. Let's not forget, North Korea's
:15:37. > :15:39.raison d'etre is almost too destroy the country of South Korea. The
:15:40. > :15:44.question is, are they bluffing or will they see this through? It is a
:15:45. > :15:50.paper tiger. Its conventional forces are quite weak and could easily be
:15:51. > :15:54.overwhelmed. Despite those displays. At some of the stuff being displayed
:15:55. > :15:59.as possibly not even real. It is easy to whip up a crowd like that
:16:00. > :16:02.and put on a Big Show. That is why they have those big rallies, to
:16:03. > :16:06.intimidate the West. What is interesting is how laid-back South
:16:07. > :16:09.Koreans are about all of this. I think they are rather phlegmatic
:16:10. > :16:13.about it. You hear the Helen Furey coming out of North Korea all the
:16:14. > :16:18.time, and I think they have almost got used to it. Let's bear in mind
:16:19. > :16:24.soul is only 35 miles away from the border, and they do have thousands
:16:25. > :16:29.of armed missiles pointed at Seoul -- Seoul. If something happens,
:16:30. > :16:36.Seoul, with 10 million souls, would be in the crosshairs.
:16:37. > :16:41.Don't forget, all the front pages are online on the BBC News website,
:16:42. > :16:44.where you can read a detailed review of the papers.
:16:45. > :16:48.It is all there for you seven days a week at bbc.co.uk/papers,