:00:00. > :00:00.deliberate a targeted. TRANSLATION: The two officers they
:00:00. > :00:16.were wounded and other nearby at officers returned fire, and the
:00:17. > :00:21.attacker was killed. Hello and welcome to a look ahead at the
:00:22. > :00:31.papers for tomorrow. Some have managed to get the Paris shootings
:00:32. > :00:35.on to their front pages. Thank you for stay with us to do a second
:00:36. > :00:39.review of the papers the night will stop will be looking at the various
:00:40. > :00:42.lies coming in from the news agencies as we are talking. Writers
:00:43. > :00:43.are in particular dropping lines every few minutes about the attack
:00:44. > :00:50.in Paris. Let's start with Daily Telegraph
:00:51. > :00:53.which has the Paris attack quoting the French Interior Ministry
:00:54. > :00:56.saying police had been deliberately The paper also reports
:00:57. > :01:02.from Brussels, saying that EU that the UK retains European laws
:01:03. > :01:06.regarding the rights of EU citizens living here after Brexit,
:01:07. > :01:13.as part of any deal. "New Terrorist Attack
:01:14. > :01:16.in Paris" is the headline The paper also reports
:01:17. > :01:19.on government's plans to abandon the planned rise in probate charges
:01:20. > :01:25.payable on the death of a loved one. The Metro reports on a major
:01:26. > :01:27.study which suggests artificially sweetened drinks may
:01:28. > :01:30.increase the likelihood of developing dementia
:01:31. > :01:39.or suffering from stroke. Let me with a couple of the papers
:01:40. > :01:45.that are reporting on the Paris shooting tonight. The Daily Mail is
:01:46. > :01:49.of them. One policeman dad, too critical, it says, after a
:01:50. > :01:52.government goes on a rampage on the Champs-Elysees is just before the
:01:53. > :02:01.election. -- Champs-Elysees just before. All too often, we have had
:02:02. > :02:06.to report seems like this in Paris in the past two years, haven't we?
:02:07. > :02:17.Yes. These freezers will be very familiar to a lot of people. --
:02:18. > :02:20.phrases. There is in use in having perspective and saying these are
:02:21. > :02:27.small-scale attacks which may not have huge amounts of co-ordination
:02:28. > :02:34.and made not ring cities to a halt. This also shows that once again,
:02:35. > :02:38.people in the emergency services, police in particular, are out on the
:02:39. > :02:44.streets every time they go to work on a potentially putting their lives
:02:45. > :02:48.at risk? Yes. That Italy when you have here a police officer killed
:02:49. > :03:00.again doing his duty. And you have this iconic landscape in the
:03:01. > :03:05.background. You have the Arc de Triomphe, and the Big Ben clock
:03:06. > :03:11.tower in London. These big tourist sites are the target of attacks.
:03:12. > :03:13.Just a couple of lines from Reuters. The Paris prosecutors are saying
:03:14. > :03:19.that they have identified the gunmen, but they are still assessing
:03:20. > :03:25.if he had compasses or not. -- gunman. There was a report that an
:03:26. > :03:32.arrest warrant was issued because they thought that somebody else
:03:33. > :03:35.could be out there to speak to. But they said that police raids are
:03:36. > :03:38.ongoing. They are looking at addresses in the follow-up is part
:03:39. > :03:43.of their investigation. But the timing of this, of cause, is also
:03:44. > :03:48.significant. Just three days before the first round of the French
:03:49. > :03:53.presidential election. We have sunny similar in this country. Last July,
:03:54. > :04:05.the referendum, the EU referendum, Wenger -- when Jo Cox was murdered.
:04:06. > :04:10.I don't get really affected in the end. I think people accepted that
:04:11. > :04:16.that was a horrific, murderous attack by a deranged individual. And
:04:17. > :04:24.hopefully, the people of France will put this aside and not allow it to
:04:25. > :04:28.affect their elections. The Daily Telegraph also has this on their
:04:29. > :04:33.front page. A gunman with a Kalashnikov was known to security
:04:34. > :04:37.services, they say. This will be the information will be looking for in
:04:38. > :04:41.the next few days. Who this person was, and my connection they might
:04:42. > :04:48.have with other groups. Somebody who might be on a watchlist. I think is
:04:49. > :04:51.important to say that just because somebody was known to security
:04:52. > :05:01.services does not mean that there was a failing. People can also be
:05:02. > :05:07.known without being suspicious. Yes, a lot more information to come. A
:05:08. > :05:12.lot of leaders will say it is depressingly regular. And very
:05:13. > :05:18.different tiers and levels of extremism among some of the
:05:19. > :05:22.suspects. I guess the security services had to categorise them into
:05:23. > :05:27.how dangerous they think they are and how much information they have.
:05:28. > :05:31.Manpower is not limitless. They need to decide who is the priority. I was
:05:32. > :05:36.reading that there are potentially thousands, if not tens of thousands
:05:37. > :05:41.of, people on watch lists, potentially. How can even a well
:05:42. > :05:47.resourced security service keep track of all of them? There is also
:05:48. > :05:51.the suggestion that either the accomplice or the gunmen had come
:05:52. > :05:56.from Belgian, which is Brussels, and that is regarded as somewhat of a
:05:57. > :06:01.centre for terrorist activity. If that is the case, we are looking at
:06:02. > :06:05.is open border situation in continental Europe, where people can
:06:06. > :06:10.move freely from one country to the next, and that brings the downside,
:06:11. > :06:14.in terms of moving guns across the continent, which, luckily, we are
:06:15. > :06:18.not in the Schengen area and we do have the channel between us and
:06:19. > :06:26.France, which makes us a little more guarded from gun crime. Let's move
:06:27. > :06:30.on and look at the Times. A story about the EU. Britain told to keep
:06:31. > :06:37.EU laws on workers and security, says Brussels.
:06:38. > :06:42.Plus the jurisdiction from the European court of justice. This will
:06:43. > :06:46.be a surprise to many. You have a deal to protect the rights of EU
:06:47. > :06:51.nationals in the UK and British nationals elsewhere in the EU. What
:06:52. > :06:56.is now being suggested is that would involve the European court still
:06:57. > :07:00.having power over what the British government does to the European
:07:01. > :07:03.citizens in the UK. Even if they give them the right, which seems
:07:04. > :07:07.easy to do, you can stay here for the rest of your lives, we have to
:07:08. > :07:15.accept court rulings with regard to benefits, child benefit with Jo for
:07:16. > :07:19.example to those overseas -- child benefit for example. You would need
:07:20. > :07:24.a new body to preside over issues like this, a country like us not in
:07:25. > :07:28.the EU and a country that will? If I'm being too simple then please
:07:29. > :07:32.tell me, but if Britain leaves the European Union, we are out of the
:07:33. > :07:37.jurisdiction of the European Union so I can't see how the courts of the
:07:38. > :07:41.European Union can affect people who live here, be them Europeans or
:07:42. > :07:47.British or EU nationals or not. Surely that is if they retain the
:07:48. > :07:51.rights are stowed upon them by being a citizen of the EU because they're
:07:52. > :07:56.not a British scissors, they haven't relinquished those rights, there has
:07:57. > :08:03.to be a supranational body that can preside -- British citizen. If it's
:08:04. > :08:07.affecting the way Britain operates as an independent, sovereign nation,
:08:08. > :08:12.then it becomes a bit more complicated. The fact we are having
:08:13. > :08:15.this conversation shows how difficult the whole business of
:08:16. > :08:24.Brexit is. Untangling ourselves from 40 years of joint regulation and how
:08:25. > :08:28.it happens is very conjugated. This is a proposal from Michel Barnier,
:08:29. > :08:34.and has the backing of the European Parliament. -- complicated. We were
:08:35. > :08:39.told it was only Germany standing in the way of a deal between British
:08:40. > :08:44.nationals in the EU and EU nationals here, it seems that they're asked
:08:45. > :08:58.him the minds on this. It is square one and a difficult one to move on
:08:59. > :09:01.from -- there are demands. If we outside the framework there has to
:09:02. > :09:07.be a court that can adjudicate between us and the EU. It is
:09:08. > :09:11.plausible you could have European citizens living in Britain who were
:09:12. > :09:14.subject to British courts and British interpretations of what it
:09:15. > :09:18.means to protect your rights of residence, family life and those
:09:19. > :09:25.kind of things. If they are as good as you got when we were part of the
:09:26. > :09:29.EU. It doesn't seem like this is... They're saying it's a red line, it
:09:30. > :09:35.doesn't seem the only way of going about things. If they're worried
:09:36. > :09:43.about their rights to claim benefits after a post-Brexit, we would write
:09:44. > :09:47.that into law and it would be agreed and our courts would uphold that.
:09:48. > :09:53.There would be no need for the ECJ to make a judgement. This is very
:09:54. > :09:56.complicated. I don't remember any of it in the referendum campaign! I
:09:57. > :10:00.wonder why. Doesn't make for a snappy headline!
:10:01. > :10:04.Let's look at the Guardian, something else we thought couldn't
:10:05. > :10:10.be un-pick but perhaps it can be. Not too late to avert Brexit, says
:10:11. > :10:16.EU leader. The president of the European Parliament, an Italian, who
:10:17. > :10:20.is generously saying Theresa May is wrong, you can turn back if you
:10:21. > :10:27.change your mind, we will keep you in. You don't have to leave.
:10:28. > :10:31.Exactly. I think a lot of people are actually looking at European law as
:10:32. > :10:35.it is written, they would say there is so much ambiguity, enough of a
:10:36. > :10:40.grey area that if Britain decides it wants to stay in the EU, it's a
:10:41. > :10:44.political will question. The people who believe in the European project
:10:45. > :10:49.see this as damaging that Britain has left and of course they would
:10:50. > :10:52.want to keep Britain on board in those circumstances. I think he is
:10:53. > :10:56.saying something many have thought for a long time. Can we turn the
:10:57. > :11:01.clock back to July when we were having the referendum? I remember
:11:02. > :11:08.the levers saying, look, if we vote to Leave, it will send a shock to
:11:09. > :11:13.the European Union and they will up the offer to stay and then we can
:11:14. > :11:17.have a second referendum. They would have thought they were losing at
:11:18. > :11:23.that stage and they were going to hold out to those who weren't sure
:11:24. > :11:28.that if we hold a referendum we will get a better offer from Europe and
:11:29. > :11:33.the Leave campaign said don't be ridiculous, leave means leave. Now
:11:34. > :11:37.we have voted to leave, the European Union are saying... It would make it
:11:38. > :11:43.easier for them if we did? They aren't saying we are going to get a
:11:44. > :11:47.better deal, cutting budget contributions for example, they're
:11:48. > :11:51.saying it's not too late to stay together. They aren't offering any
:11:52. > :11:58.reform? To be fair we haven't asked for anything in particular...
:11:59. > :12:03.Theresa May is so keen to get out. What would be required for this is a
:12:04. > :12:06.Lib Dem victory in the general election, it doesn't look likely in
:12:07. > :12:15.the next two years Theresa May will turn around and stay -- say let's
:12:16. > :12:22.stay in. Article 50 is such a small clause, it has to be open to
:12:23. > :12:26.interpretation. I was always told it wasn't reversible. Even when you
:12:27. > :12:30.change your mind you are out, that is a vicious thing to say so he has
:12:31. > :12:34.said the logical more generous thing. Looking at the Telegraph and
:12:35. > :12:40.another EU related story, Theresa May commits to cutting migration to
:12:41. > :12:46.the tens of thousands. Some people think it is impossible to get it
:12:47. > :12:49.under 100,000. The reason it was impossible and why David Cameron
:12:50. > :12:54.promised that in 2010 was because we were in the EU. There's more
:12:55. > :13:00.immigration from non-EU countries. They can control that. But they
:13:01. > :13:04.haven't. Exactly. What they are saying is when we leave the EU the
:13:05. > :13:09.Prime Minister will do more to crack down on immigration and get it into
:13:10. > :13:14.the tens of thousands. Let's see if she can do it. She should have wiped
:13:15. > :13:18.the slate clean, she wants a new mandate, she could have had a
:13:19. > :13:22.different mandate. Lots of people are urging her to do that, why make
:13:23. > :13:27.a promise that has been proved to be hard to keep. You could fudge this
:13:28. > :13:32.promise, you could take out student numbers, those who contribute to the
:13:33. > :13:35.economy, you could give it an impossibly long time frame. There is
:13:36. > :13:41.some wiggle room, she said to wants to cut it to sustainable levels but
:13:42. > :13:46.it doesn't say to 2019. It is hard to hold her to account on this. She
:13:47. > :13:52.can say the line of below 100,000 until the end of the next parliament
:13:53. > :13:58.if she wants. It was below 100,000, net migration, in the 1990s. It is
:13:59. > :14:02.plausible there are a lot more EU member states at the moment who have
:14:03. > :14:06.sent a lot of people here. What's curious about this is having voted
:14:07. > :14:13.for Brexit, most people believe immigration will be certainly cut,
:14:14. > :14:21.especially from East Europe. There's no great need for her to say this
:14:22. > :14:26.but she has. They can't help but make pledges, but they are asked to
:14:27. > :14:32.make them! Let's look at the Mail again, Theresa May taxes plan for
:14:33. > :14:36.rise in death tax. This will be a sliding scale increase in fees when
:14:37. > :14:43.people die, their wills and estates have to be disposed of. Is this a
:14:44. > :14:46.casualty of the fact there isn't any parliamentary time between now and
:14:47. > :14:51.June the eighth to see bills like this through the house? Yes, the
:14:52. > :14:55.government want to introduce higher charges without having to go through
:14:56. > :15:02.Parliament. Liz Truss, the Justice Minister, has the power to increase
:15:03. > :15:05.your death tax in some cases. A parliamentary committee took a look
:15:06. > :15:10.and said actually this isn't really a fee because it bears no relation
:15:11. > :15:14.to the cost of dying and having an estate process, so actually it's a
:15:15. > :15:18.tax and you can't do that without Parliamentary emission. Business
:15:19. > :15:22.ends in Parliament next week before the election so they don't have the
:15:23. > :15:28.necessary resources to put this through -- permission. They could
:15:29. > :15:34.bring this back in the next session. Will it be in the manifesto one
:15:35. > :15:41.asked is? It is the second slight U-turn from the budget -- one asks.
:15:42. > :15:46.We had the NICs, swiftly ditched, and now this, a good excuse to do
:15:47. > :15:52.it. It takes it off the agenda for the election, unless of course she
:15:53. > :15:56.decides to put it in the manifesto. It was going to be quite a good
:15:57. > :16:01.earner for the Treasury? ?1.5 billion a year, taxing rich, dead
:16:02. > :16:07.people, it doesn't seem like voters are going to punish you. Good
:16:08. > :16:10.arguments in favour of this moneymaking scheme. Philip Hammond
:16:11. > :16:17.needs the money. Let's finish with the Metro, I think it is the Express
:16:18. > :16:23.looking at this, diet cola linked to dementia and strokes. If you drink a
:16:24. > :16:28.diet drink every day it more or less triples your risk. A lot of people
:16:29. > :16:34.are drinking these thinking they are being healthy. I know friends who
:16:35. > :16:38.won't drink the fall flat Coke, the normal Coca-Cola, but they buy Diet
:16:39. > :16:43.Coke and it has been the norm recently -- full fat. What you are
:16:44. > :16:46.giving up in the sugar you are replacing with chemicals which
:16:47. > :16:51.sweeten the drink for you. Artificial sweeteners. This story
:16:52. > :16:57.doesn't seem to say, we can only see the front page, it doesn't say where
:16:58. > :17:04.but it says drinking diet drinks can increase the links by three times
:17:05. > :17:08.for dementia and strokes. It's all about moderation. If you're drinking
:17:09. > :17:12.a lot of these everyday then you must be doing yourself some harm, so
:17:13. > :17:17.cut down. I'm sticking to the water but I want to see the full study,
:17:18. > :17:22.I'm not convinced entirely from the front page. There will be something
:17:23. > :17:27.that contradicts it. Go back to alcohol! Let me finish by telling
:17:28. > :17:30.you something else I have read from Reuters from the French prosecutor,
:17:31. > :17:35.he is saying they know the identity of the attacker involved in the
:17:36. > :17:39.shootings this evening in Paris. The identity is known, it has been
:17:40. > :17:43.checked, but he said he won't be giving the name until we have
:17:44. > :17:47.determined whether any more accomplices are around. These are
:17:48. > :17:51.life pictures looking down the Champs Elysee towards the Arc de
:17:52. > :17:56.Triomphe. We are still investigating and raids are ongoing, he said.
:17:57. > :18:01.Investigators want to know whether or not he had accomplices. The
:18:02. > :18:06.wounded police officers' lives are no longer in danger, said the
:18:07. > :18:11.Interior Ministry, no word yet about the passerby also injured. That's it
:18:12. > :18:15.for the papers tonight. Thank you to Henry and Dave for staying for our
:18:16. > :18:17.second review this evening. Thank you very much.