:00:00. > :00:00.them. The latest Alien film, directed by Ridley Scott. It has had
:00:00. > :00:15.some mixed reviews. Find out what Mark Kermode made of it in. -- made
:00:16. > :00:21.of it in The Film Review. Hello and welcome to our look ahead
:00:22. > :00:27.to what the papers will be With me are Anne Ashworth,
:00:28. > :00:30.who's the associate editor at The Times, and Bonnie Greer,
:00:31. > :00:32.playwright and writer Let's take a look at
:00:33. > :00:38.the front pages then. The Telegraph leads with Friday's
:00:39. > :00:41.cyber attack that hit 48 NHS trusts. It says thousands of operations
:00:42. > :00:44.and appointments will be cancelled, as staff brace themselves for more
:00:45. > :00:47.problems as they attempt to log on to work computers
:00:48. > :00:50.on Monday mornings. The Observer leads
:00:51. > :00:53.on the election campaign. It says a multi-millionaire City
:00:54. > :00:56.worker has pledged to fund a campaign to try to oust almost 140
:00:57. > :01:01.pro-remain MPs to ensure there is no "backsliding on Brexit",
:01:02. > :01:06.as he puts it, after the election. The Sunday Times leads
:01:07. > :01:08.with Theresa May's pledge to change the law to help councils and housing
:01:09. > :01:11.associations build hundreds It also carries a picture
:01:12. > :01:15.of the singer Harry Styles, who says Brexit is the wrong
:01:16. > :01:22.direction for the country. The Daily Express says
:01:23. > :01:25.Theresa May is on course to win a record number of seats -
:01:26. > :01:42.398, giving her a majority of 147. Can we just clarify, before anybody
:01:43. > :01:55.gets cross with me, that my reprimand was out of love? Oh, I
:01:56. > :02:03.didn't even... I WAS actually fidgeting, so it was absolutely
:02:04. > :02:11.correct! The Daily Mail, this huge cyber attack yesterday, now, you
:02:12. > :02:18.were just saying before we came on air, it looks as if they were
:02:19. > :02:21.already on to this story? Yes, this has hit the NHS, and also
:02:22. > :02:25.organisations and companies worldwide. It looks as though there
:02:26. > :02:32.were lots of ransom demands at trusts last year. It is not clear
:02:33. > :02:37.whether any money was paid out. We know that one Californian health
:02:38. > :02:42.business DID pay out when its systems were attacked in this way.
:02:43. > :02:49.But this story is getting bigger by the moment, because it seems as
:02:50. > :02:53.though there was a failure to do anything about it in a timely
:02:54. > :03:00.fashion. And the briefings which fascinate me, one, no-one brings up
:03:01. > :03:03.the fact that Theresa May was Home Secretary, she has been Home
:03:04. > :03:10.Secretary since 2010, her job is cyber security. Now, in the real
:03:11. > :03:15.world, this would get her to stand up and admit that she was the chief,
:03:16. > :03:19.she was in charge when this happened, it is as though she has
:03:20. > :03:23.had nothing to do with this at all, her hands are completely clean. In
:03:24. > :03:27.the old days, it was a resigning issue. But nobody has come up and
:03:28. > :03:33.said, this person was in charge of this. That's important. The second
:03:34. > :03:39.thing, is that what we also don't talk about, than the NHS is probably
:03:40. > :03:45.number two, maybe number three, biggest organisation on earth. This
:03:46. > :03:50.is a massive, massive failure. And for people to be running around
:03:51. > :03:56.clutching their pearls and saying, this person... No, this is something
:03:57. > :04:00.somebody needs to stand up to and take personal responsibility. The
:04:01. > :04:04.decision to cancel the contract to patch up the systems, that seems
:04:05. > :04:09.strange, because it seems there were no plans to replace this particular
:04:10. > :04:15.software, and... Once it stops being supported. So, but is something we
:04:16. > :04:21.need to have clarified. But I still want to say, this is an election
:04:22. > :04:26.cycle, the person who wants to be the Prime Minister was responsible
:04:27. > :04:32.for our cyber security, she should say something about it in that
:04:33. > :04:38.capacity. That's what she should do. Also, the Prime Minister chose Amber
:04:39. > :04:43.Rudd and she kept on the person who is running the NHS as well. She is
:04:44. > :04:47.responsible to us, we need to hear from her. It is the most
:04:48. > :04:50.extraordinary story, that this by found the domain name which
:04:51. > :04:54.controlled all of this installed in the system by the hackers, so that
:04:55. > :05:03.they could stop the hacking. Amazing that they found it. It is barely
:05:04. > :05:06.believable. Again, that's why Theresa May needs to say something
:05:07. > :05:15.to us. Let's look at the Sunday Times on this story. It is therefore
:05:16. > :05:19.you on juju, if you want to learn how to develop one somewhere. This
:05:20. > :05:26.is the kind of video which Youtube can get into bother about, isn't it?
:05:27. > :05:37.If the Sunday Times can find it, why could you chew not find it? ?
:05:38. > :05:43.Presumably quite easily. With a leak to a site where it can be bought for
:05:44. > :05:48.$20. There is an old mathematical axioms which says that no system can
:05:49. > :05:51.be both consistent and complete. So, the minute that you make something
:05:52. > :05:57.like this, there is the key to breaking it down. I have to go back
:05:58. > :06:03.to Theresa May... No, it is important! You have to be vigilant,
:06:04. > :06:09.there has to be vigilant. It is not possible to catch up with all of
:06:10. > :06:15.this. But won't she say that the NHS has many, many IT specialists who
:06:16. > :06:18.are employed entirely to make sure that this system is secure, not her
:06:19. > :06:28.as the Home Secretary? Ultimately, somebody needed to report to
:06:29. > :06:34.somebody. We need to find out where the buck stopped, and instead of
:06:35. > :06:43.keystone cops running around sort of thing, where does the buck stop?
:06:44. > :06:47.This is able to lives involved. -- this is people's lives involved. I
:06:48. > :06:51.know this is a massive story but I want to move on. The Sunday
:06:52. > :06:55.Telegraph, Tories, don't ditch a little bit! That have been
:06:56. > :06:59.comparisons made between Theresa May and Margaret Thatcher, but this is
:07:00. > :07:03.suggesting that Theresa May is moving too far away from a little
:07:04. > :07:08.bit's economic principles... I know you won't agree! I don't, actually,
:07:09. > :07:13.I don't even understand what that is! I think this is just the Sunday
:07:14. > :07:18.Telegraph being a Thatcherite paper, to be honest. But it is interesting,
:07:19. > :07:24.there is a battle for the soul of what it is to be a Tory, is it to be
:07:25. > :07:28.a free marketeer or is it to be a person who intervenes like with the
:07:29. > :07:35.energy cap come in the free market? And capping executive pay as well.
:07:36. > :07:38.So, I would have liked to have read more about this story. There has
:07:39. > :07:44.been a battle since 2010, when David Cameron decided the Tory party was
:07:45. > :07:48.going to be a bit of this, a bit of that, a little bit of that. I think
:07:49. > :07:52.what the Sunday Telegraph is doing is to remind the Conservative Party
:07:53. > :07:56.that there are core principles and ideas. You can't take Labour ideas,
:07:57. > :08:01.which they do at every election, which is what they are doing now,
:08:02. > :08:06.and graft them into the Conservative Party. They are asking, what is the
:08:07. > :08:12.Conservative Party? As they are a asking in America, what is the
:08:13. > :08:17.Republican Party? I think there is this new breed, the
:08:18. > :08:21.twentysomethings, who are supposed to be going in behind Mrs May. So
:08:22. > :08:25.maybe these are the kind of policies which are kind of slightly socialist
:08:26. > :08:28.which Mrs May feels will appeal to that group of voters, who may never
:08:29. > :08:33.have voted before. But I do think there is a core question being
:08:34. > :08:37.asked, and it's always a question which the Conservative Party needs
:08:38. > :08:41.to ask, it is probably why Brexit is happening and everything else, what
:08:42. > :08:48.exactly are they, other than a vote winning machine? It works, though.
:08:49. > :08:52.Well... We do know it works, but I think the Sunday Telegraph is asking
:08:53. > :08:57.a core question, what are you? Let's go back to the Sunday Times. Me
:08:58. > :09:11.pledges council has revolution. Well, there you go.
:09:12. > :09:20.Finally, housing, rising to the top of the agenda. Run it is entirely my
:09:21. > :09:25.fault, I am confusing you. Just quickly, this prediction that there
:09:26. > :09:34.is going to be a most enormous victory. Landslide victory, greater
:09:35. > :09:40.than any other. Than any, ever, on earth. We know that we are in a
:09:41. > :09:42.crazy time, Emmanuel Macron is a black swan, nobody knows where he
:09:43. > :09:51.came from. Donald Trump, who would have thought it? Now, Theresa May,
:09:52. > :09:55.landslide? We shouldn't trust anything, we don't know. Lord
:09:56. > :09:59.Ashcroft in the week, similar suggestions. Tom Watson is very,
:10:00. > :10:03.very frightened of the size of the Tory victory, and may not be as
:10:04. > :10:12.great as this but you might be surprised. 40-50 seat smacks. There
:10:13. > :10:20.you go. Sunday Times, for real this time... May pledges council has
:10:21. > :10:24.revolution to Labour voters. It is extraordinary, the private rented
:10:25. > :10:31.sector is now much, much bigger than council housing. Nobody has built
:10:32. > :10:38.any council houses, and Mrs May says she's going to Vilbrim. And who
:10:39. > :10:42.didn't do that? You see... Who sold them off? Yes, but also, the
:10:43. > :10:46.Conservative Party has not done a lot in this direction. They have run
:10:47. > :10:50.the country for the last seven years. Suddenly now, they're going
:10:51. > :10:56.to do this. But the Labour government didn't build, either, did
:10:57. > :11:00.they? They have all been doing it, but the fact is, are we supposed to
:11:01. > :11:05.believe this? Let's give 30 seconds to a man in a red suit. Harry
:11:06. > :11:14.Styles, Brexit is the wrong direction. For those not familiar,
:11:15. > :11:21.he was part of One Direction. Why doesn't he like Brexit? He does not
:11:22. > :11:24.think it is our direction in which he would like to be going. But it is
:11:25. > :11:30.very interesting, the new positioning of Harry Styles with a
:11:31. > :11:35.slight edge, wearing that suit. The manufactured pop star is becoming a
:11:36. > :11:41.man with a voice of his own. It is his generation as well, my caper,
:11:42. > :11:46.the New European, was very happy to hear this from Harry Styles. He
:11:47. > :11:53.could be on your front page. Let's look at the Observer. Speaking of
:11:54. > :12:00.Brexit, millionaire Brexit donor, he is Hosking, he wants no backsliding
:12:01. > :12:04.on Brexit. I write about quite a lot of this, and I am not really
:12:05. > :12:10.familiar with this name. And also, how you can really turn people
:12:11. > :12:16.against Remain MPs in cities like London, where people were largely
:12:17. > :12:25.saying Remain. There's always these next Luther Tykes who emerge... And
:12:26. > :12:30.they come out of the woodwork and say, we have got tonnes of money and
:12:31. > :12:33.we are going to make this happen. I think people are smarter than that.
:12:34. > :12:40.But there has been a move to raise money to make sure that there are
:12:41. > :12:46.pro-Remain candidates? This is going to be... Well, Mrs May has called
:12:47. > :12:57.this a Brexit election, she said she needs a strong hand. But I think
:12:58. > :13:02.these are just Lex Luther types. It is more about winning over the
:13:03. > :13:07.Labour voters. So, that is not how to do the papers, if you're
:13:08. > :13:14.presenting it! Thank you so much! Fiona, thank you. Coming up next,
:13:15. > :13:20.The Film Review.