:00:00. > :00:00.Churchill in the drama about the wartime Prime Minister has been
:00:00. > :00:00.praised by critics. Mark Kermode brings us his thoughts about this
:00:00. > :00:14.and the other Cinema releases this week in The Film Review.
:00:15. > :00:18.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be
:00:19. > :00:27.Brian Cox the actor, not the astronomer, just work that out! --
:00:28. > :00:33.work. -- worked. With me are Reuters Business
:00:34. > :00:37.correspondent Tom Bergin and Kate Devlin, political
:00:38. > :00:42.correspondent at the Herald. Tomorrow's front pages,
:00:43. > :00:44.starting with... The front page of the Times
:00:45. > :00:46.says that relief efforts at Grenfell Tower have
:00:47. > :00:48.descended into chaos, with reports of survivors
:00:49. > :00:50.being rehoused hundreds The Daily Mail has
:00:51. > :00:54.a photograph of the inside of one of the flats in the tower,
:00:55. > :00:57.which it says show the victims of the devastation the fire
:00:58. > :01:03.caused on its front page. on the Conservative Party
:01:04. > :01:06.leadership, reporting that David Davis is emerging as a unity
:01:07. > :01:09.candidate to become interim party on the Brexit talks due
:01:10. > :01:14.to start tomorrow, reporting that the Chancellor is urging
:01:15. > :01:17.a focus on business. The Guardian reports that
:01:18. > :01:19.European leaders fear the fragility of Theresa May's
:01:20. > :01:22.government makes it more likely Britain could crash out
:01:23. > :01:24.of the EU without a deal. The Independent also
:01:25. > :01:26.looks at Brexit, and a report which suggests that
:01:27. > :01:29.plans to cut immigration could have a double whammy
:01:30. > :01:31.effect on the economy. confidence is high
:01:32. > :01:44.as Brexit talks begin. Let's start with the Daily Mail, one
:01:45. > :01:48.of a number of papers that tonight is showing a photograph from inside
:01:49. > :01:55.the Grenfell tower after that devastating fire. Showing the sheer
:01:56. > :02:04.scale of destruction. From this one you can see more, it was once a
:02:05. > :02:08.person's home. All the internal walls have been destroyed, the
:02:09. > :02:14.furniture has been burned to ashes. Truly shocking pictures and even
:02:15. > :02:19.people like myself who have seen fatal fires elsewhere in the past,
:02:20. > :02:25.these are unusual, the share for city of the flames. It raises the
:02:26. > :02:29.question of what happened -- ferocity. The correspondent who
:02:30. > :02:34.wrote this story in the Daily Mail is the chief crime correspondent,
:02:35. > :02:38.there's the issue about the possible criminal investigation, it's a
:02:39. > :02:41.mystery as to why this happened so quickly. Some ideas are being put
:02:42. > :02:45.forward, I spent time this week trying to find out what happened and
:02:46. > :02:51.what the rules are with respect to housing, if some of the panels that
:02:52. > :02:55.have been reported were used in this tower, that could be why this
:02:56. > :02:59.happened in this way. It will be interesting to see how much we get
:03:00. > :03:06.on that as we move forward, the UK can take quite a while to establish
:03:07. > :03:12.faxed. The Times, same story, fire victims left in the lurch by relief
:03:13. > :03:17.effort problems. All sorts of issues, Kate. It does seem like it
:03:18. > :03:26.has taken a long time to get where we are. Today people being offered
:03:27. > :03:34.?10 to try to deal with even the day to day costs. This evening they are
:03:35. > :03:41.going to get ?500 in cash and another ?5,000 payable into bank
:03:42. > :03:45.accounts tomorrow. It seems like ministers at Number 10 are trying to
:03:46. > :03:53.play catch up on this despite days of bad headlines about how badly
:03:54. > :03:57.they have dealt with this situation. Specifically how badly Theresa May
:03:58. > :04:00.has dealt with the situation. Also the council has come in for
:04:01. > :04:05.criticism, the management company that was meant to be looking after
:04:06. > :04:09.this building. There are so many people with questions to answer.
:04:10. > :04:12.Absolutely. Councils should have disaster plans. Also the number of
:04:13. > :04:17.people really isn't that many, you're talking about 400 people,
:04:18. > :04:20.Jeremy Corbyn made the point of this happens every day at Heathrow,
:04:21. > :04:25.hundreds of people that aren't able to make flights and you could put up
:04:26. > :04:29.at hotels. It shouldn't have been such a horrible logistical class to
:04:30. > :04:33.look after the welfare of the people for this period of time but it seems
:04:34. > :04:38.that people aren't being taken care of an Theresa May has accepted that.
:04:39. > :04:42.The other paper looking at it is the Guardian, the picture of a little
:04:43. > :04:44.girl putting a candle amongst flowers to remember those who died.
:04:45. > :04:54.The headline says: This is just a figure to tide them
:04:55. > :04:58.over, ?5,000 when you've lost absolutely everything. Ministers
:04:59. > :05:04.making very clear that that amount can be increased depending on the
:05:05. > :05:10.costs that people suffer and the amount they would need, but this is
:05:11. > :05:14.an initial payment from the ?5 million emergency fund that they
:05:15. > :05:19.announced earlier in the week. I have to say, they are now having to
:05:20. > :05:22.explain more and more details about this emergency fund and it's because
:05:23. > :05:28.they're coming under so much pressure about how they're handling
:05:29. > :05:31.this. I was just reading in the Guardian that Gold command, a
:05:32. > :05:37.network that manages disasters, has had to take this on, the British Red
:05:38. > :05:41.Cross also being very instrumental in helping people? The FT reporting
:05:42. > :05:47.that other chief executives from other local authorities are becoming
:05:48. > :05:51.important and taking the lead away from the Kensington and is a local
:05:52. > :05:56.authority, which itself says it is doing all it can and it is active
:05:57. > :06:02.but it seems to be there is a bit of a vote of no-confidence in
:06:03. > :06:08.government officials. There's an interesting nugget in the Times
:06:09. > :06:12.front-page story, suggesting the local council spent ?50 million less
:06:13. > :06:16.than it took in on council housing last year. Questions about how much
:06:17. > :06:20.money they are collecting in rent and then spending on services for
:06:21. > :06:24.council houses. Let's stay with the Guardian:
:06:25. > :06:33.There isn't a majority, the one Theresa May was seeking in the snap
:06:34. > :06:37.election she called, they don't have the whip and they were hoping for.
:06:38. > :06:45.They don't. There's a couple of different ways you could look at
:06:46. > :06:50.this in cash whip hand. They are taking the open wound that Theresa
:06:51. > :06:53.May suffered -- whip hand. The conversation Jean-Claude Juncker had
:06:54. > :06:58.with Theresa May was leaked pretty much verbatim. Given that
:06:59. > :07:03.occasionally he has tried to poke fun at the UK's woes as well. I
:07:04. > :07:11.think there's also something more serious to this, which is it is in
:07:12. > :07:15.the EU's interest to get an agreeable deal. Perhaps not as
:07:16. > :07:23.agreeable as some Conservative ministers would like, but it's not
:07:24. > :07:27.without their interests in this as well. Were it to descend into chaos
:07:28. > :07:33.and to fall apart, that wouldn't be the best thing for France or Germany
:07:34. > :07:40.either. The Daily Express, Tom, has a much more optimistic look at it.
:07:41. > :07:44.Confidence high as talks begin, it says, it doesn't say who is
:07:45. > :07:48.confident. It's interesting, I was speaking to an exporter this week
:07:49. > :07:53.who told me he didn't think Britain had enough time to lay the car parks
:07:54. > :07:58.we would need around Dover as soon as Brexit comes, maybe it is a boost
:07:59. > :08:01.for road builders or car park builders, because as soon as customs
:08:02. > :08:07.clearance comes in it will take a while for lorries to get through. If
:08:08. > :08:11.we leave the customs union. Actually, yes, even if we leave...
:08:12. > :08:16.Even if we leave the Common Market we could still have customs
:08:17. > :08:20.clearance. One of the issues is there are a million small tiny
:08:21. > :08:24.details that lead to the correct functioning of the European Union,
:08:25. > :08:28.and the easy transit of millions of transactions every day. It's like
:08:29. > :08:32.the back of a hi-fi, we don't know how it works, we don't really want
:08:33. > :08:37.to know, but somehow all those wires are connected and it makes sound we
:08:38. > :08:42.quite like. Woe betide one of them coming loose. As soon as you rip
:08:43. > :08:45.them all apart then it may not work as well as you would like and you
:08:46. > :08:51.might not understand why but you won't get the sound you used to
:08:52. > :08:55.enjoy. Philip Hammond might not even have been Chancellor going into
:08:56. > :09:00.these talks had the election turned out differently, he is saying now,
:09:01. > :09:04.bear in mind, I wonder how he is feeling on the eve of this given
:09:05. > :09:08.that he is an ardent Remainer. He has to negotiate our withdrawal and
:09:09. > :09:12.he's worried about the economy. He is. It's interesting how he's
:09:13. > :09:19.playing his hands since the general election result. Affectively he is
:09:20. > :09:24.arguing for a soft Brexit without saying it, that we need to focus on
:09:25. > :09:28.the economy rather than focusing on immigration -- effectively. Even
:09:29. > :09:32.today saying about immigration saying there's no timescale for it
:09:33. > :09:39.and cutting immigration shouldn't come at the economy. Even the
:09:40. > :09:43.Treasury says radical cuts to immigration even without leaving the
:09:44. > :09:47.EU would hurt the economy in itself. I wonder whether the people
:09:48. > :09:52.negotiating it for us are of the same opinion about what Brexit
:09:53. > :09:55.should be. Hammond of course said that people didn't vote to make
:09:56. > :10:03.themselves poorer. The government, if you're negotiating the situation,
:10:04. > :10:06.you have conflicting aims. On the one hand people want to limit
:10:07. > :10:10.immigration... Basically people want all the upside and none of the
:10:11. > :10:15.downside, they want their cake and be able to eat it too. That's
:10:16. > :10:17.difficult if you have contradictory ambitions so they are in a
:10:18. > :10:30.commander. P2 of the Sun: It with his gloves on. Philip Hammond
:10:31. > :10:35.not being able to talk about a trade deal from the get go, which is what
:10:36. > :10:39.he wanted, the EU saying you have to wait until we've sorted the rest of
:10:40. > :10:44.it out. It's interesting, this is the narrative and framework we have
:10:45. > :10:51.seen the negotiation as. When you go to negotiate a house, I don't meet
:10:52. > :10:54.many people who say I got 50% of. Generally when you try to negotiate
:10:55. > :10:58.its around the margin and this is the case with trade deals. They are
:10:59. > :11:03.well-established, the parameters are limited in terms of movement. The
:11:04. > :11:07.idea we should see it as a big battle doesn't really make much
:11:08. > :11:11.sense. David Davis is on the front of the Telegraph whether he wants to
:11:12. > :11:20.be or not, being tipped to be interim Tory leader. Holder for wild
:11:21. > :11:25.things are tricky quiz blue indeed! Especially for the next two years --
:11:26. > :11:35.hold the fort while things are tricky quiz blue indeed! Just while
:11:36. > :11:39.you get Brexit sorted --? Indeed! He is pledging to go to Brussels
:11:40. > :11:48.tomorrow and returned with a deal like no other in history. That's in
:11:49. > :11:53.the Sun? It can be read in two ways, lots of things are historic, Rafa
:11:54. > :11:57.Nadal winning ten French opens is historic, but the Titanic was also
:11:58. > :12:04.historic. I'm surprised they have signed that one off. It's
:12:05. > :12:08.interesting where this story is coming from with David Davis and
:12:09. > :12:13.it's coming from, as it says in the Telegraph, it says he was tipped for
:12:14. > :12:18.the post by Boris Johnson, which I think tells you everything. He wants
:12:19. > :12:25.to be the permanent leader! Let's finish with P2 of the Daily Mail,
:12:26. > :12:29.Google plots let's on IS propaganda. Why are they doing it now, there's
:12:30. > :12:35.been pressure on them for months -- blitz. There's talk about new
:12:36. > :12:40.computer programmes that can help to spot difficult content, problematic
:12:41. > :12:44.content. Google and Facebook and some of the other social media
:12:45. > :12:50.platforms are being blamed for helping the radicalisation of
:12:51. > :12:54.certain young Muslims and others and they are under pressure to do
:12:55. > :12:58.something about it. The problem for the companies is they would rather
:12:59. > :13:04.not spend the money doing this. If they can do it like this that would
:13:05. > :13:07.be cheaper but the companies haven't been held to account for the
:13:08. > :13:13.material that has been disseminated on the platform and they are trying
:13:14. > :13:16.to fend it off. It is quite significant for them because it's a
:13:17. > :13:19.real threat to their business model, if they're going to be held
:13:20. > :13:24.accountable and they are being forced to put in place mechanisms to
:13:25. > :13:28.stop it it could hurt them financially significantly. Fair play
:13:29. > :13:32.to the Mail and the Times, who have been running a campaign on this, one
:13:33. > :13:39.thing they will do is prevent adverts from appearing on extremist
:13:40. > :13:43.material, they are making sure the people don't make any revenue from
:13:44. > :13:47.it, this is something they have been under pressure on for weeks and
:13:48. > :13:49.weeks but now effectively they are doing something about it.
:13:50. > :13:52.Don't forget you can see the front pages of the papers online
:13:53. > :14:02.evening you can watch it later on BBC iPlayer