29/06/2017

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:19. > :00:22.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

:00:23. > :00:26.With me are Tim Stanley, lead writer at The Daily Telegraph,

:00:27. > :00:27.and Jessica Elgot, Political Correspondent

:00:28. > :00:29.Tomorrow's front pages starting with.

:00:30. > :00:36.welcome to you both. The front pages... We're not doing them, we

:00:37. > :00:43.are so short a time we're going straight on. The Metro is where we

:00:44. > :00:51.begin. Squeaky bum time. That takes hand-picking. Prime Minister clings

:00:52. > :00:56.to power implying it was a bit nip and tuck from Theresa May today

:00:57. > :00:59.because of her lack of majority. I'm impressed by this because it managed

:01:00. > :01:07.to combine two stories in one. One story is the purchasing of DUP

:01:08. > :01:11.support so the government giving ?33 per taxpayer in order to get the

:01:12. > :01:19.support they need in order to get the Queen's speech voted through

:01:20. > :01:25.which happened today by a margin of 223 -- 323-309. Essentially that is

:01:26. > :01:32.the story, they have paid off the DUP and because they have support

:01:33. > :01:35.they now have a agenda. But it has exposed how things are going was

:01:36. > :01:41.back in the Metro says Theresa May squeaked through the speech and the

:01:42. > :01:47.nature is everyone will be from now on. This is the best it gets for

:01:48. > :01:51.Theresa May. This is all of the Conservative MP votes, no rebels and

:01:52. > :01:57.all of the DUP members. Every vote will be this close. These are the

:01:58. > :02:00.types of things the DUP said yes we will supported that they cannot be

:02:01. > :02:09.sure if they get around to anything as? It covers finance, security, a

:02:10. > :02:13.confidence motion, Brexit legislation so the very basic start

:02:14. > :02:17.of the daily life of the government. That could continue but other things

:02:18. > :02:21.could be disagreed upon and we should listen to save the DUP has

:02:22. > :02:24.forced a U-turn on things like means testing, the Winter fuel allowance

:02:25. > :02:28.and the triple lock and pensions. And of course as we will discuss

:02:29. > :02:31.with the abortion amendment, the price has already shot up a little

:02:32. > :02:43.bit because the government has caved on one other aspect. Why don't we

:02:44. > :02:47.talk about that? Abortion concession had soft Tory revolt on the Queen 's

:02:48. > :02:51.speech, this is an amendment tabled by the Labour MP Stella Crecy.

:02:52. > :02:57.Normally amendments like this on specific issues usually fall by the

:02:58. > :03:00.wayside and I get support there was something about this that really

:03:01. > :03:04.caught the attention of MPs. I think it is because women in Northern

:03:05. > :03:09.Ireland if they come over here for an abortion they have to pay for it

:03:10. > :03:12.even though the UK taxpayers pay for the NHS but because it is so

:03:13. > :03:16.restricted in Northern Ireland most of them will travel over here if

:03:17. > :03:23.they want to have a termination. Most MPs, most Tory MPs said they

:03:24. > :03:27.had no idea this was the case. It seemed like a really strange

:03:28. > :03:29.anomaly. It is bizarre they didn't know because there are certain

:03:30. > :03:34.things about Northern Ireland which set it very much a part in

:03:35. > :03:37.legislative terms for the rest of the UK. But the key thing they

:03:38. > :03:40.didn't know is if they came here to have a termination that they

:03:41. > :03:45.wouldn't have won on the NHS and that they would have a charge. When

:03:46. > :03:48.Stella Crecy put this forward and it is a bit of political gameplaying

:03:49. > :03:53.with baiting the government to see if they would do this if they are in

:03:54. > :04:00.a deal with the DUP, love to talk to the Mac 40 MPs might have abstained

:04:01. > :04:03.or at the very least expressed concerns to the whip about the

:04:04. > :04:07.issue. The government seemed to decide that they have two act in a

:04:08. > :04:11.policy which has been the case for decades in the course of the

:04:12. > :04:18.morning. With cross-party support. You are absolutely right. Abortion

:04:19. > :04:21.remains devolved when it comes to Northern Ireland and there was a

:04:22. > :04:26.ruling by the Belfast Court of Appeal today that it is not a

:04:27. > :04:31.judicial issue, it is a political issue to be decided by the Stormont

:04:32. > :04:36.assembly. This is why I think the amendment was so clever. She

:04:37. > :04:38.identified the one aspect of the Northern Ireland arrangements on

:04:39. > :04:43.abortion which the Commons could legitimately have a say on. That is

:04:44. > :04:47.the issue if you can't have an abortion within Northern Ireland

:04:48. > :04:56.except for cases of rape and help, if you cannot have on their... It's

:04:57. > :05:03.not even for rape or incest. It is if the mother's health or well-being

:05:04. > :05:08.is at risk. OK and a medical emergency. If you cannot have one in

:05:09. > :05:11.Northern Ireland than he pays for it in England? That legitimately was

:05:12. > :05:18.within the purview of the Commons discussion, Ian Paisley junior said

:05:19. > :05:22.that on Wednesday in a debate about the Queen's speech. He said this is

:05:23. > :05:27.something England can do something about so by seizing upon that one

:05:28. > :05:30.bit, she identified the thing the Commons could legitimately discuss.

:05:31. > :05:36.There was support and it didn't end up getting voted on, she withdrew

:05:37. > :05:39.it. So she probably managed to identify the one thing that you

:05:40. > :05:43.could actually do through the Commons. Movie: looking at the

:05:44. > :05:53.express which is a somewhat perplexing headline. May gets big E

:05:54. > :05:56.exits boost. How? When I first saw this I couldn't understand what the

:05:57. > :06:05.story was about and then I read it and this was about an amendment

:06:06. > :06:08.which will supported by good chunk of Labour MPs against the advice of

:06:09. > :06:12.their own party whips which was to keep Britain in the single market.

:06:13. > :06:22.The way the express have done this is to say that this motion was

:06:23. > :06:27.rejected by thumping 322 votes - one original one which was betrayed as a

:06:28. > :06:32.defeat for Labour but it was a back table amendments. Jeremy Corbyn

:06:33. > :06:36.whipped the majority of his MPs to vote to abstain on the amendment so

:06:37. > :06:42.it is a bit of a technical way of betraying it. It happily into the

:06:43. > :06:55.next headline which we understand a bit more which is on page two of the

:06:56. > :07:00.sun. Regular trio Corbinned. Some of the MPs have voted to stay in the

:07:01. > :07:03.single market lost their place on the Labour front bench. Corbin

:07:04. > :07:12.sacked three and two May have resigned. One definitely reside.

:07:13. > :07:15.This is what is really fascinating. Everyone is talking about the

:07:16. > :07:18.election that didn't go the way people expected. I have been away

:07:19. > :07:21.for a few weeks and it seems like Labour won the election. The

:07:22. > :07:25.government is on the back foot so that outcome is unexpected that the

:07:26. > :07:28.other one that other people are talking about is that the Labour

:07:29. > :07:33.front bench has reconciled itself to Brexit and not just to Brexit to

:07:34. > :07:36.leaving the single market. So we're now in a position where Jeremy

:07:37. > :07:41.Corbyn is whipping his people to keep them on side of leaving the

:07:42. > :07:45.single market, sacking people who disagree with that and of course the

:07:46. > :07:50.left and much of the Labour Party are cheering him on. It is true the

:07:51. > :07:53.election did not produced a hard Brexit Tory led government that

:07:54. > :08:00.everybody expected that would have this massive majority. True. But the

:08:01. > :08:04.election result has empowered Jeremy Corbyn which means you have the

:08:05. > :08:10.Labour Party which is essentially committed to a kind of hard Brexit.

:08:11. > :08:15.And will thereby disappoint a lot of the Labour members who voted remain?

:08:16. > :08:19.It is striking when you compare the Glastonbury 2016 wire it was the

:08:20. > :08:25.time of the referendum and many people are customary weighted in

:08:26. > :08:31.their tents for the result and this year the great reception that Jeremy

:08:32. > :08:37.Corbyn got and it feels like there is quite a disconnect from that

:08:38. > :08:42.young demographic who are mostly pro-remain and their feelings about

:08:43. > :08:46.Jeremy Corbyn because as Tim just said the basically has

:08:47. > :08:51.rubber-stamped hard Brexit. Left, right and centre there are divisions

:08:52. > :08:55.where you look. The times. Keep the cost of cladding style tower experts

:08:56. > :09:01.told. This is the Times investigation revealing council

:09:02. > :09:05.pressure over the cost of the refit. We must save the BBC has not seen

:09:06. > :09:10.these e-mails and we will tell you at the moment for the Council have

:09:11. > :09:14.said in response. Because of obvious legal implications of this I'm going

:09:15. > :09:20.to stick very precisely to the text. It describes this in minutes of

:09:21. > :09:23.meetings, price outlets and other correspondence which focuses on

:09:24. > :09:27.cost-cutting before the refurb is. Which has been linked to the fire

:09:28. > :09:32.which seven people tragically died in. One example. One e-mail lists

:09:33. > :09:36.three options for the reduction of costs in cladding intended to encase

:09:37. > :09:44.the building. For instance the use of aluminium panels instead of sink

:09:45. > :09:49.which could mean a saving of 293,000 pounds. Of course zinc panels would

:09:50. > :09:55.be noncombustible but the aluminium cladding which was eventually used

:09:56. > :10:00.had a flammable core. Let's tell you what the council said. They have

:10:01. > :10:12.said that the Cabinet of the Council and the person the Council are

:10:13. > :10:18.leading, rock fielding melon, are... Based on the advice received from

:10:19. > :10:23.the managing company which was not only response will for delivering

:10:24. > :10:30.the project but ensuring the Bill James met the current regulations.

:10:31. > :10:33.-- building. They are asking for a justification in the increase of the

:10:34. > :10:38.budget which would have been made in the spirit of ensuring public funds

:10:39. > :10:41.whilst being poorly managed and could be justified. Safety would not

:10:42. > :10:46.have been compared my son are quite clear that they allowed the right

:10:47. > :10:51.amount of expenditure. If you look at the very beginning of the time

:10:52. > :10:58.story it says in that they received, the records show little evidence

:10:59. > :11:02.that is clearly something the council has contested in the

:11:03. > :11:07.statement that safety concerns would have been part of the

:11:08. > :11:12.decision-making process. I don't know if we can move on, a story

:11:13. > :11:20.going on throughout the whole of the day about a public meeting which

:11:21. > :11:26.should have held the night in Kensington and Chelsea Council. The

:11:27. > :11:31.Daily Telegraph briefly, a private meeting and the Guardian and other

:11:32. > :11:35.media organisations got a court order to allow reporters into the

:11:36. > :11:39.meeting. Yes during the course of the day that was a High Court ruling

:11:40. > :11:42.that says journalist should be allowed into this, what was supposed

:11:43. > :11:50.to be a public meeting which was changed to be private at the

:11:51. > :11:54.council. And when the leader of the council realised at the start of the

:11:55. > :11:58.meeting that there were journalists he had another meeting to take

:11:59. > :12:01.place. He did seem to understand they were there in the first place.

:12:02. > :12:07.And finally some levity if you don't mind. The Daily Express, not in the

:12:08. > :12:13.house, MPs can go tireless. The common speaker sweeping away a

:12:14. > :12:17.custom for 100 years, should men have to wear a tie? I have been

:12:18. > :12:22.meditating upon the Sordo. On the one hand the wearing a retired means

:12:23. > :12:25.you have two the business, the extra effort to look presentable means

:12:26. > :12:29.your mind is focused. On the other hand some people wear such ludicrous

:12:30. > :12:38.and absurd tyres that they themselves undermine the

:12:39. > :12:43.institution. Yes or no. I like the type 94 wearing one. Don't ever turn

:12:44. > :12:49.up here without wearing one that is it for the papers tonight.

:12:50. > :12:52.Don't forget you can see the front pages of the papers online

:12:53. > :12:57.It's all there for you - 7 days a week at bbc dot co uk

:12:58. > :13:00.forward slash papers - and if you miss the programme any

:13:01. > :13:02.evening you can watch it later on BBC iPlayer.

:13:03. > :13:07.Headlines coming up for you at the top of the hour.