:00:15. > :00:18.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:19. > :00:32.in co-ordinated outfits, which I am sure they arrange before coming on
:00:33. > :00:32.the news... With me are Ruth Lea,
:00:33. > :00:35.who's Economic Adviser and the journalist and columnist,
:00:36. > :00:38.Yasmin Alibhai-Brown. Tomorrow's front pages, starting
:00:39. > :00:40.with Ttomorrow's Financial Times leads on what it says
:00:41. > :00:43.is the Chancellor's bid to cushion the blow of Brexit
:00:44. > :00:45.with a two-year transition deal. The Metro says the Chancellor
:00:46. > :00:48.is at loggerheads with some fellow ministers, who he accuses of trying
:00:49. > :00:51.to undermine his strategy The Daily Telegraph also leads
:00:52. > :00:55.on the supposed rift between Philip Hammond
:00:56. > :00:57.and his Cabinet colleagues - one of whom accuses the Chancellor
:00:58. > :01:01.of trying to keep Britain in the EU. The Times says Britain is wasting
:01:02. > :01:03.billions on fighter jets that the RAF won't be able to use
:01:04. > :01:07.because of defence cuts. Call 999 - get Skype instead -
:01:08. > :01:10.the headline on the Daily Mail, which reports that some patients
:01:11. > :01:13.are being denied ambulance crews The Sun leads on the new Doctor
:01:14. > :01:17.Who - Jodie Whittaker - the 13th Time Lord and the first
:01:18. > :01:20.woman to play the role. While the Mirror greets
:01:21. > :01:23.the new Doctor with delight - it's About Time Lord,
:01:24. > :01:26.says their front page. And back to Brexit on tomorrow's
:01:27. > :01:28.Guardian front page, which warns of a threat to food
:01:29. > :01:46.supplies after Britain leaves. What on earth is going on inside the
:01:47. > :01:54.Cabinet? Two different stories. Hammond the hypocrite on the Daily
:01:55. > :02:04.Mirror. Raking in ten K a month renting properties and accuses the
:02:05. > :02:11.public sector are being overpaid. There is a different mood in the
:02:12. > :02:18.country. At one point everybody knew this and nobody can but the sense of
:02:19. > :02:25.economic injustice is rife and, I think, for the Chancellor, if he
:02:26. > :02:30.made those remarks, they were unwise. I suppose it is not he was
:02:31. > :02:36.among fellow colleagues and I think The Mirror is right to do this
:02:37. > :02:44.because I get so irritated by rich people, whoever they are, being so
:02:45. > :02:49.down on those who have so much less than them and I think it is good to
:02:50. > :02:53.be reminded that a lot of people are making decisions for us have not
:02:54. > :03:06.lived the last many of us, many people live. It shows on one of the
:03:07. > :03:12.pages, 11 Downing St, the use of a beautiful mansion in the
:03:13. > :03:17.countryside... Alex Syriza house... This is all perfectly legitimate it
:03:18. > :03:24.is just that it is difficult for some people the stomach but we did
:03:25. > :03:30.hear the Chancellor said on the Andrew Martin Showa that they
:03:31. > :03:40.receive a premium, public sector workers. Who knows whether he said
:03:41. > :03:45.it not... He must have said it. If he said it in the Cabinet meeting,
:03:46. > :03:49.which should not have been late, you do not know the context. I think the
:03:50. > :03:54.point I presume he was trying to make is that the public sack has
:03:55. > :03:57.some premium in terms of remuneration over the private sack
:03:58. > :04:05.that especially in the pension costs. Our research everything for
:04:06. > :04:11.this programme and it was a referral to a study that said even without
:04:12. > :04:16.the pension allowance, the public sector workers were paid more than
:04:17. > :04:24.private sector workers are allowing for so-called qualifications... Then
:04:25. > :04:29.we should be talking to the private sectors and telling them to stop
:04:30. > :04:34.exploiting workers. That is what Philip Hammond was trying to say the
:04:35. > :04:38.top if you compare salaries then actually they do seem to have a
:04:39. > :04:47.premium... But if they are better qualified and have higher education.
:04:48. > :04:54.He has just after that. They are just as far as they can... But
:04:55. > :05:02.public sector people, like John Donald said this morning, this
:05:03. > :05:08.cleanup on ?230 a week... You live on that? This is not what Philip
:05:09. > :05:14.Hammond was trying to save up although I take your point. He was
:05:15. > :05:24.just trying to make a comment about the difference. I cannot bear it,
:05:25. > :05:31.you are so consensual. This is not what the viewers tuned in for, this
:05:32. > :05:38.kind of agreement. I am with Philip Hammond. It used of treachery.
:05:39. > :05:43.Deliberately trying to frustrate the withdrawal from the EU and he says
:05:44. > :05:49.people are briefing against him and tried to stopping cushion the blow
:05:50. > :05:54.against the economy and jobs. As I say, he gave the speech about three
:05:55. > :05:59.weeks ago and I thought it was perfectly reasonable because he said
:06:00. > :06:07.we would be out of that single market but he wants a transitional
:06:08. > :06:15.management. This could be the thousand and 22 before it becomes
:06:16. > :06:25.functional. I see no problem. -- 2022. I do not think he is trying to
:06:26. > :06:31.be treacherous. There is a huge number of Brexiters who want to
:06:32. > :06:36.slash and burn and do this thing without due consideration. What is
:06:37. > :06:41.going to happen to our country and the people of our country. Here I
:06:42. > :06:49.come down with you in favour... Hammond at least is not a slash and
:06:50. > :06:56.burn kind of guy but there are people... There is an emotional
:06:57. > :07:03.overreaction to Brexit. I do not think he can survive this if the
:07:04. > :07:09.leaks carry on but he is the most sensible of the lot. The irony is,
:07:10. > :07:17.if you look at what the Brexit Department has published, and indeed
:07:18. > :07:27.even Theresa May later to task, he was pertinently reasonable in my
:07:28. > :07:34.view. -- Tusk. She wanted a close relationship to their EU. David
:07:35. > :07:41.Davis is not a slash and burn either. I think he can be sometimes,
:07:42. > :07:49.on a bad day at. It is just ideologically driven. He is a very
:07:50. > :07:57.pragmatic like and knows he has to negotiate. This is about internal
:07:58. > :08:07.struggles and power. Mr Davies showing his ?100,000 watch today. It
:08:08. > :08:13.was in the papers. It is not watch, it is leather trousers. The
:08:14. > :08:21.Guardian, ministers said to be sleepwalking to lower standards. A
:08:22. > :08:26.lot of people, like I said, are ideologically driven towards Brexit
:08:27. > :08:31.rather than sensibly thinking about it. They are in your recall the
:08:32. > :08:39.evidence coming in. Food prices are going up. They were going up if all
:08:40. > :08:48.the referendum... They are going up all because of food supply problems.
:08:49. > :08:53.I cannot believe the kind of bullies on the side of Brexit, and we have
:08:54. > :09:00.them too but not as bully is these, one of the things surely any
:09:01. > :09:05.government and politician has an absolute duty to is to protect the
:09:06. > :09:08.country they are in charge from terrible economic disasters and
:09:09. > :09:17.other disasters and I find this really frightening. I think it is
:09:18. > :09:25.complete cobblers. I do not think it is right to say that but you have.
:09:26. > :09:30.If all we join the EEC, we had a perfectly sensible agricultural
:09:31. > :09:37.policy. But the world has moved on. We imported food at world prices,
:09:38. > :09:44.whether it was from the states, and that Australia... We did not have
:09:45. > :09:50.the range of food in our diets. Give me with one reason why we are still
:09:51. > :09:54.not going to be importing food. This country was a basket case when I
:09:55. > :10:01.arrived in 1972. This is utter and complete cobblers because we will
:10:02. > :10:04.continue to import food and the advantage of being outside the EU is
:10:05. > :10:12.that we will not be in this protectionist policy that has height
:10:13. > :10:17.tariffs on imported food... But it also has high standards. So why
:10:18. > :10:26.don't we keep them? I have little doubt... This is an objective
:10:27. > :10:35.research... Object if! Are you going to reject fact... Yes, it is
:10:36. > :10:44.absolute cobblers. This is the fourth time, if you are offended by
:10:45. > :10:51.this mild language I apologise. We can/ tariffs and get cheaper food
:10:52. > :11:00.prices. We can have lower food prices. This is all fantasy. We will
:11:01. > :11:06.have to wait and see. Highly protectionist organisation called
:11:07. > :11:12.the EU. It is not protectionist. 25% tariffs. A very protectionist US
:11:13. > :11:19.government is making here promises an hour. Finally we have got some
:11:20. > :11:30.discord. That is why you tuned in. You have said enough. The Sun,
:11:31. > :11:35.Doctor Who - Jodie Whittaker is going to be a doctor. For the first
:11:36. > :11:42.time we have a woman. But you thrilled? Yes. I am also thinking
:11:43. > :11:53.what took so long and know the answer to my question because men.
:11:54. > :12:05.It is men. It is men. The Guardian, time gentlemen please. Great
:12:06. > :12:13.headline, we'd use that also. I am very thrilled about... What's the
:12:14. > :12:22.name? Jodie Whittaker. Why not. I think we need to say what kept you
:12:23. > :12:36.so long? I am being consensual now. What took you so long. The Mail, new
:12:37. > :12:43.balls, please. Federer wins we pierced Wimbledon final ever. What
:12:44. > :12:58.is wrong with that? Felt a bit sorry for Chile each. -- Cilic. He had a
:12:59. > :13:06.very horrible blister and I felt sorry for him. You are in the finals
:13:07. > :13:11.at Wimbledon and you have a bad foot, I think you sort of lost his
:13:12. > :13:17.nerve. He was playing against the drop. I like it that more men are
:13:18. > :13:26.weeping. I think too many of them have kept all these inside the too
:13:27. > :13:35.long. I like a man that weeps. Prince Philip doesn't. And I do like
:13:36. > :13:45.Prince Philip Fer that reason and... -- for that reason. When you want
:13:46. > :13:50.this so badly, you are bound to feel very emotional. We are living in
:13:51. > :13:54.good times where men can express their feelings. It has been cruel
:13:55. > :13:58.that many of them have had to live through a cruel historical period
:13:59. > :14:04.where they worked allowed to. We do not want too much of it. We do not
:14:05. > :14:12.want politicians crying... Theresa May shed a tear. Philip Hammond is
:14:13. > :14:20.probably shedding a tear... We are quite prone to weeping after this
:14:21. > :14:27.edition of the papers. That's it from the papers. Always a cheater,
:14:28. > :14:35.you never disappoint. You should have your own show.