:00:18. > :00:20.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:21. > :00:24.With me are Laura Hughes of the Daily Telegraph
:00:25. > :00:32.Thank you both for coming, we are paying you as much as I male
:00:33. > :00:36.reviewers, don't fret. Controversial but you have to laugh at don't you?
:00:37. > :00:39.The Telegraph reports on calls by the Transport Secretary to ditch
:00:40. > :00:40.first class compartments on crowded commuter trains.
:00:41. > :00:43.And it has a new photo of Prince George - released
:00:44. > :00:46.The Guardian says Interpol has circulated a list
:00:47. > :00:49.of Islamic State fighters it believes could be trained to carry
:00:50. > :00:55.It also features on its front page Lady Hale, the new president
:00:56. > :01:02.The weekend edition of the FT reports on a probe
:01:03. > :01:04.into pension transfers after concern that some people cashing
:01:05. > :01:10.in their final salary pensions may be getting unsuitable advice.
:01:11. > :01:12.The Times claims hard-left Labour supporters
:01:13. > :01:15.are plotting to oust Tom Watson as the party's deputy leader -
:01:16. > :01:17.and replace him with the Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily
:01:18. > :01:20.On its front page, The Daily Mail reports that
:01:21. > :01:22.Labour MPs are urging women to boycott Boots over
:01:23. > :01:25.its refusal to cut the cost of the morning-after pill.
:01:26. > :01:29.of an illegal immigrant who walked free from court after he burst
:01:30. > :01:33.into a church and threatened to kill English people.
:01:34. > :01:38.at the BBC have been promised better wages to stay quiet
:01:39. > :01:48.And the Sun has news that Pudsey the dancing dog -
:01:49. > :01:54.made famous on Britain's Got Talent - has died.
:01:55. > :02:02.Let's begin, shall we? What a week. Let's begin with the Telegraph. "
:02:03. > :02:05.The line for first class. This is Chris Grayling doing a wide-ranging
:02:06. > :02:11.interview, yet this is the headline that has come out. This is because
:02:12. > :02:16.the Telegraph have had a long campaign against this ridiculous
:02:17. > :02:19.system we have where we are packed like sardines in trains, hot and
:02:20. > :02:22.sweaty desperate rank to get to work and you can see in the distance this
:02:23. > :02:26.empty first-class carriage which really we don't have a need for.
:02:27. > :02:31.Chris Grayling has done this interview with our political editor
:02:32. > :02:34.and said he understands the pain of commuters as a commuter himself, he
:02:35. > :02:39.comes into work every morning on the train. He has vowed to crack down on
:02:40. > :02:44.this system so we will be seeing less first-class carriages. Some of
:02:45. > :02:47.the trains like travelling, they are suspended. It's as first-class but
:02:48. > :02:53.anyone can sit in here. What if you have bought a first-class ticket,
:02:54. > :02:56.you'd be pretty miffed? I always wonder who these people are hereby
:02:57. > :03:04.first-class tickets on short commuter routes. -- these people who
:03:05. > :03:08.buy first-class tickets. Loads of people go and sit in first
:03:09. > :03:12.class anyway, even if they don't have a ticket. It's a good idea. Not
:03:13. > :03:16.me ever, of course. But I think it is a fairly common practice, so
:03:17. > :03:20.getting rid of them is the right thing to do. What else has come out
:03:21. > :03:26.of this wide ranging interview do we know? Drones, the crackdown on
:03:27. > :03:32.drones in airports he said. Near airports. That's a good idea, isn't
:03:33. > :03:36.it? Lots of stories of chaos at airports as drones fly across the
:03:37. > :03:40.sky. It's a problem. Actually across London, I think it is illegal to fly
:03:41. > :03:42.drones over London but we have seen that happen recently. There have
:03:43. > :03:46.been more reports of drones recently. I can't imagine anything
:03:47. > :03:49.more terrifying if you're an airline pilot then suddenly seeing a drone
:03:50. > :03:54.coming towards you. Seems like something that should not happen. It
:03:55. > :04:00.shouldn't. That's all we can say. Does not feel like we have a huge
:04:01. > :04:04.amount of detail, have we? He has also said Theresa May will stay
:04:05. > :04:10.until 2020. Now we are getting somewhere! Given that obviously this
:04:11. > :04:12.week has seen lots of different rumours, and cabinet members
:04:13. > :04:15.briefing against each other over the weekend, which has been seen as
:04:16. > :04:23.people jostling for power. Suggesting she is not weak enough...
:04:24. > :04:36.Too weak, not strong enough! LAUGHTER Strong and stable. Let's
:04:37. > :04:41.move The Times. Plot to oust Labour number two, Corbyn supporters target
:04:42. > :04:48.Watson for removal. Who are these hard left elements, do we even know?
:04:49. > :04:53.The Times story doesn't necessarily make it clear who they are but it is
:04:54. > :04:57.fair to say that among some of Jeremy Corbyn's perhaps more
:04:58. > :05:03.hard-core fan base, Tom Watson is not popular. He was one of the
:05:04. > :05:08.people who first tried to get Jeremy Corbyn to stand down last summer. He
:05:09. > :05:11.then went public about his doubts about Corbyn's leadership throughout
:05:12. > :05:16.the whole of the last year. He has made it clear he does not think that
:05:17. > :05:18.Corbyn would lead the party to an election victory necessarily. He has
:05:19. > :05:26.made himself unpopular in that regard. And he was right. Yes, but I
:05:27. > :05:29.think Watson himself would admit that Corbyn did better than he
:05:30. > :05:34.expected him to. Whether there's a plot to replace, Tom Watson himself
:05:35. > :05:37.has said since the election result that he... You know, Jeremy Corbyn
:05:38. > :05:42.has earned the right as the leader and he will give him his backing.
:05:43. > :05:44.And that he will not block Corbyn even making any sort of party
:05:45. > :05:49.reforms that he wants to make that might give the left wing of the
:05:50. > :05:52.party more power. I don't understand, perhaps people don't
:05:53. > :05:57.seem to be happy with that. This article does not have lots of
:05:58. > :06:02.sources quoted at all, does it? Does that lead you to discover who was
:06:03. > :06:08.making these brats? I think it raises interesting questions -- who
:06:09. > :06:13.was making these threats? Interesting questions about
:06:14. > :06:16.Thornbury. It does not seem like there any direct plans, any motions
:06:17. > :06:20.tabled to be voted on at the party 's conference later this year, which
:06:21. > :06:24.could introduce some of these changes but probably would not pass
:06:25. > :06:27.anyway. The other angle to this is that there are talks of this
:06:28. > :06:32.McDonald clause, which would reduce the number of MPs that you need to
:06:33. > :06:37.nominate you if you want to run for the leadership. Again, even if I was
:06:38. > :06:41.to happen, which it might, the idea behind it is that if they do
:06:42. > :06:44.introduce these changes, if the Corbyn wing of the party wanted
:06:45. > :06:48.another Corbyn -esque leader, then it would be easy for them to do
:06:49. > :06:51.that, but still again, the candidates that are more moderate
:06:52. > :06:56.wing of the party would want to see. They will still get on the ballot
:06:57. > :07:00.and do well if that is the general mood of the party. But it hasn't
:07:01. > :07:06.happened yet. However, sources close to Emily Thornbury have told the BBC
:07:07. > :07:09.that if there is any suggestion Emily Thornbury is planning some
:07:10. > :07:13.challenge for the deputy leadership or would consider doing so, this is
:07:14. > :07:19.categorically untrue. Her view is that the leader leadership -- Labour
:07:20. > :07:24.leadership team needs to remain united behind that team, as it was
:07:25. > :07:29.during the election. That is sources close to Emily Thornbury. Things can
:07:30. > :07:34.change but that is it for now. Let's move on. To the Financial Times.
:07:35. > :07:38.Well. Things have been very interesting in the White House
:07:39. > :07:45.today, because Sean Spicer has stepped down from the West wing
:07:46. > :07:49.press podium, he is the much lampooned press secretary, Sean
:07:50. > :07:53.Spicer. He has now resigned because someone has been parachuted in above
:07:54. > :07:58.him as director of communications, and on with a rather marvellous
:07:59. > :08:02.name, Anthony Scaramucci, can he do the fandango asked Steve Humphries
:08:03. > :08:06.on twitter? So, Melissa McCarthy is going to be out of job on Saturday
:08:07. > :08:12.Night Live with no one to impersonate. It seems to have taken
:08:13. > :08:15.people out of surprise this one. If anything, that's the greatest
:08:16. > :08:19.tragedy of it. The Melissa McCarthy routine presumably not up for much
:08:20. > :08:24.longer, doing that amazing parity. Sean Spicer seemed too... I mean,
:08:25. > :08:26.everybody presents a boss suddenly been parachuted about them and
:08:27. > :08:31.perhaps they thought that job may be encompassed in a job title. He made
:08:32. > :08:36.it clear privately he did not want to see Anthony Scaramucci given this
:08:37. > :08:44.job as director of communications in the White House. Apparently as well,
:08:45. > :08:50.Trump's strategic advisers, to Steve Berriman, also did not want to see
:08:51. > :08:54.it happen. But Scaramucci was a choice proposed by Ivanka Trump and
:08:55. > :08:58.her husband Jared Kushner. I think it shows there are two camps are
:08:59. > :09:01.emerging in the White House. One of those is clearly having more
:09:02. > :09:09.influence than the other. I think that is the wider picture here. What
:09:10. > :09:12.that means for the presidency. And to those... How those allegiances
:09:13. > :09:16.will change, and who will be the casualties of it? Trouble in
:09:17. > :09:23.paradise. Trump has only been in power for six months. Because Sean
:09:24. > :09:29.Spicer was such an internationally known figure, I can't really
:09:30. > :09:32.remember the names of Obama's... Because these won't broadcast until
:09:33. > :09:38.recently, he became disordered caricature. For him to go is another
:09:39. > :09:42.blow to Trump who is going to a bit of difficulty at the moment. Had
:09:43. > :09:45.some legislative defeats, obviously there is this probe into his
:09:46. > :09:52.campaign 's links with Russia. It's not great for him to have another...
:09:53. > :09:57.How much do you and the Sarah Huckabee sounders? It's not an easy
:09:58. > :10:00.job, is it? One of the things she has two avoid which Sean Spicer most
:10:01. > :10:05.definitely did not avoid is when the spokesman becomes the story, that is
:10:06. > :10:11.bad news. And Sean Spicer became the story on multiple occasions. He got
:10:12. > :10:14.quite cross, didn't he? But Anthony Scaramucci, very polished, very
:10:15. > :10:17.smooth operator. Let's look at the mail. This is not the kind of story
:10:18. > :10:28.we would normally expect. It's almost as if the Guardian and the
:10:29. > :10:30.mail have swapped editors for the night, isn't it? Labour inputs
:10:31. > :10:33.boycott Rory, women urged to snub the chemist because it is refusing
:10:34. > :10:36.on principle to cut the price of the morning after pill. The quote from
:10:37. > :10:41.Boots is astonishing. I could not really believe it when he said...
:10:42. > :10:46.They keep the charge of ?28 to avoid incentivising inappropriate use. I
:10:47. > :10:50.mean... I don't know what an appropriate use of the morning after
:10:51. > :10:54.pill is. But they seem to think there is such a use for it. I would
:10:55. > :11:00.be interested to see how they might define that inappropriate use. It
:11:01. > :11:03.has been halved and other shops? Strange, almost like they have been
:11:04. > :11:07.lobbied by anti-abortion campaigners is what it suggests. Or, it's been
:11:08. > :11:16.used as an excuse to make more profit. The generic pill in France
:11:17. > :11:19.is like ?5 50? Yeah, and Tesco and Superdrug have half that price after
:11:20. > :11:22.this campaign, but Tesco are not budging. Lots of Labour MPs coming
:11:23. > :11:29.out today saying it's outrageous. Women and girls should boycott the
:11:30. > :11:34.shop. It's Boots that are not budging, isn't it, and Tesco and
:11:35. > :11:38.Superdrug who have agreed. Vote with your feet, women are advised by
:11:39. > :11:42.Stella Creasy MP. Onto the Guardian for a couple of stories. Europe
:11:43. > :11:47.given a list of potential suicide killers. This is Isis fighters who,
:11:48. > :11:50.as the caliphate begins to, or continues to collapse, they could be
:11:51. > :11:55.heading to Europe. They have not yet though. There is no suggestion that
:11:56. > :11:59.this list of people who have entered Europe, but this is a people who
:12:00. > :12:05.Interpol are officially worried about and want to distribute to
:12:06. > :12:10.states in Europe, to say, these people are on a watchlist. These are
:12:11. > :12:15.people believe our all have been trained to stage attacks in the
:12:16. > :12:19.West. We do not know they are heading to Britain, we do not know
:12:20. > :12:23.what they are heading or even if they have come on their way. But
:12:24. > :12:25.clearly that is something the authorities are sufficiently
:12:26. > :12:32.concerned about to want to warn the governments. The fact they can
:12:33. > :12:36.travel over here, a large number of them, they must know who they are.
:12:37. > :12:42.They have got quite an accurate figure. It says suspect stains have
:12:43. > :12:44.been collected, the date Isis recruited them, the likely address,
:12:45. > :12:49.the mosque they pray out, their mother 's name and photographs. This
:12:50. > :12:53.whole profile has been created so they will basically be flagged if
:12:54. > :12:56.they are seen entering any country, I presume. It's a fairly detailed
:12:57. > :13:01.database they have compiled on these people. One would hope that would
:13:02. > :13:04.make it easier for law enforcement or police or intelligence agencies
:13:05. > :13:06.to track their movements. People have slipped through the net before
:13:07. > :13:11.and that is what is quite frightening about it. Interesting,
:13:12. > :13:14.yesterday on the last day of Parliament the Cabinet Office
:13:15. > :13:17.slipped out this announcement that they were going to review Britain's
:13:18. > :13:25.security capabilities. There was a defence review in 2015 but they had
:13:26. > :13:28.just realised that the threats we are facing have increased at a rate
:13:29. > :13:30.we could not predict. We do not necessarily have the resources to
:13:31. > :13:35.deal with threats from terrorism and cyber attacks and this is a classic
:13:36. > :13:38.example of how all this work is being done behind the scenes in all
:13:39. > :13:41.this technology used to find these people, track and monitor them and
:13:42. > :13:46.get all this information. If you can't stop them when they get it,
:13:47. > :13:50.it's gone to waste in a way, hasn't it? I always wonder about the danger
:13:51. > :13:58.some people have put themselves in to gather this sorts of information,
:13:59. > :14:01.the risks to themselves. What a lot of intelligence experts will say
:14:02. > :14:05.about this if you were to try to take any optimistic view on a story
:14:06. > :14:08.like this, is that the reasons is happening is because the West is
:14:09. > :14:16.winning the fight in the Middle East, but Isis is being squeezed,
:14:17. > :14:20.they are in a corner in and Iraq. That occur in Syria and Iraq. This
:14:21. > :14:25.is the last resort to start launching attacks in the West. It
:14:26. > :14:33.shows we are succeeding in the Middle East. As long as they don't
:14:34. > :14:37.get here. Stay with the Guardian... A picture story. First woman to lead
:14:38. > :14:43.the highest court in the land. The Supreme Court, who is this? She is
:14:44. > :14:50.wonderful. We were saying earlier. She does not take... Takes no
:14:51. > :14:57.prisoners. This is Baroness Hale of Richmond. Barbara Hale, going to be
:14:58. > :15:05.sworn in in October. This in a week where discrimination has been in the
:15:06. > :15:13.news. Very close to home. It's very heartening to see. The first woman.
:15:14. > :15:17.It's extraordinary that we have so many, female head of state, we have
:15:18. > :15:22.the Queen, without necessarily have a choice in that but the female
:15:23. > :15:27.Prime Minister, we have the female First Minister, female head of the
:15:28. > :15:31.Met police and now female president of the Supreme Court. And other
:15:32. > :15:36.female party leaders as well. That is something that in a week where we
:15:37. > :15:45.have not perhaps had the most encouraging headlines. About
:15:46. > :15:49.winning, in work, and the challenges that women face. It is encouraging
:15:50. > :15:54.to see this. Is she getting the same as her predecessor? She of all
:15:55. > :16:01.people will be fairly well placed. Let's hope so. She probably knows
:16:02. > :16:05.one or two lawyers who can help her...
:16:06. > :16:10.Finally, back to The Times. Let me find it. Sorry, I'm very badly
:16:11. > :16:15.organised tonight. There we go. Mary Poppins. Corr blimey, Dick Van Dyke
:16:16. > :16:19.with Julie Andrews on the cover. He has now apologised for his atrocious
:16:20. > :16:24.cockney accent when he played Bert in the musical in 1964. His accent
:16:25. > :16:31.is almost as famous as the film and the songs, isn't it? As a child, I
:16:32. > :16:34.didn't notice. I didn't either, I grew up in Yorkshire and I didn't
:16:35. > :16:37.really know what cockney accent sounded like either! For me, I don't
:16:38. > :16:40.remember thinking it was a bad thing. Clearly you watch it as an
:16:41. > :16:46.adult, you think, that is cringeworthy. Apparently he was
:16:47. > :16:51.given some bad advice from the lead actor in Northumbria six. David
:16:52. > :16:54.Tomlinson who also played the father in Mary Poppins advised it van Dijk
:16:55. > :17:05.on what a complex and should sound like. -- the lead actor in bed knobs
:17:06. > :17:12.and broomsticks. He went back to Tomlinson and said, what were you
:17:13. > :17:16.thinking? And Tomlinson, with his silver spoon mouth, said I only told
:17:17. > :17:20.you what I thought cockney sounded like. I did not say I had ever met a
:17:21. > :17:25.cockney. Check the person you're taking advice from? A nice if true.
:17:26. > :17:28.And that is the papers for tonight. Don't forget you can see the front
:17:29. > :17:31.pages of the papers online It's all there for you -
:17:32. > :17:36.seven days a week at bbc dot co uk forward slash papers -
:17:37. > :17:39.and if you miss the programme any evening you can watch it
:17:40. > :17:41.later on BBC iPlayer. Thank you Laura and
:17:42. > :18:05.Jessica - Goodbye. Friday brought us a day of mixed
:18:06. > :18:08.fortunes in terms of the weather. It's been very wet and windy in the
:18:09. > :18:13.West is this band of rain tracked its way slowly east. You can see
:18:14. > :18:15.that swirl of cloud associated with an area of low pressure, further
:18:16. > :18:16.east it was clear