0:00:00 > 0:00:16injuries to suggest another person was involved in her death.
0:00:17 > 0:00:20Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
0:00:20 > 0:00:22bringing us tomorrow.
0:00:23 > 0:00:25With me are Henry Zeffman, Political reporter at the Times
0:00:25 > 0:00:31and Public Affairs Consultant Jacqui Francis.
0:00:31 > 0:00:35A flavour first of all of the front pages as a whole. The Financial
0:00:35 > 0:00:40Times reports that ministers are expected to give Theresa May the go
0:00:40 > 0:00:44ahead to increase the Government's Brexit divorce bill offer to move on
0:00:44 > 0:00:48EU negotiations. There's the Times. They say Robert Mugabe's refusal to
0:00:48 > 0:00:52resign as Zimbabwe President has left the country in despair. The
0:00:52 > 0:01:00Metro also leading on Zimbabwe, describing Mugabe as "clinging on to
0:01:00 > 0:01:06power". And the Daily Mirror says former defence chiefs have accused
0:01:06 > 0:01:11the Government of damaging front line by cutting funding. And the
0:01:11 > 0:01:19Daily Mail says that universities have used wealth screening to look
0:01:19 > 0:01:22at students' earnings. In the Guardian, they look at the
0:01:22 > 0:01:25chaos in Zimbabwe following Robert Mugabe's decision not to Republic
0:01:25 > 0:01:30sign this evening. And the Sun claims victory in the
0:01:30 > 0:01:35campaign on energy tariffs reporting that changes to Rates could save
0:01:35 > 0:01:40households £75 a year. Let's begin with a closer look at
0:01:40 > 0:01:44some of the front pages and we'll start with the Guardian and the top
0:01:44 > 0:01:48story is Zimbabwe after that surprise decision, to most people,
0:01:48 > 0:01:56that Mugabe is not resigning after all.It was the most extraordinary
0:01:56 > 0:02:01speech. Robert Mugabe who has ruled Zimbabwe for almost 40 years,
0:02:01 > 0:02:04flanked by the military. Quite clear who was in charge now, delivered
0:02:04 > 0:02:08this 30-minute speech - a ramble is a fairer thing to say. But even
0:02:08 > 0:02:13while watching it, you were expecting the ramble to come to a
0:02:13 > 0:02:17close saying - and here's how I'm going to Republic sign. And it --
0:02:17 > 0:02:20resign. And it just didn't happen. Now it's chaos in Zimbabwe. People
0:02:20 > 0:02:24trying to work out whether he missed off a bit of the speech, which was
0:02:24 > 0:02:30meant to say he was resigning or whether this is a plan to reassert
0:02:30 > 0:02:34control, or whether the military for happy for him to stay in charge as
0:02:34 > 0:02:37long as some of the people around his wife, Grace, have less
0:02:37 > 0:02:41influence, but it is the most extraordinary spectacle.What did
0:02:41 > 0:02:45you make of it? It when on for 20 minutes saying, it will come, it
0:02:45 > 0:02:50will come, and it just never did.I think something else is going on in
0:02:50 > 0:02:54the background and in this particular article, it said the
0:02:54 > 0:02:57South African development community is to meet in Angola and they're
0:02:57 > 0:03:01talking about the possibility of letting him stay and letting things
0:03:01 > 0:03:07naturally come to an end. So the idea that you would impeach him,
0:03:07 > 0:03:10that still would take months. So he's not going straightaway, if you
0:03:10 > 0:03:14go through a process. If you tell him to go, fine. But if you want the
0:03:14 > 0:03:18constitutional process to take place, it does take time to do that.
0:03:18 > 0:03:22And it sounds like there is now a disonance between - you've got to go
0:03:22 > 0:03:26now, the people on the streets want you to go, this is what we've been
0:03:26 > 0:03:29negotiating but constitutionally, and in the speech, he seems to be
0:03:29 > 0:03:33talking about the constitution to do things properly. So I think if he's
0:03:33 > 0:03:37clever enough, he's put them between a rock and a hard place, really.And
0:03:37 > 0:03:40a lot of commentators even talking about the fact that Mugabe, at the
0:03:40 > 0:03:47age of 93, is quite a wiley player in all of this.Certainly. And
0:03:47 > 0:03:52although he did seem quite doddery, as you might expect for someone of
0:03:52 > 0:03:58his age. And at some points, he fumbled on the words and one of the
0:03:58 > 0:04:02generals who led the coup turned the pages for him. But he talked at one
0:04:02 > 0:04:07point about presiding over Zanu-PF's forthcoming party Congress, even
0:04:07 > 0:04:12though they kicked him out from the leadership position and are going to
0:04:12 > 0:04:15start impeachment proceedings tomorrow, so clearly he has a way,
0:04:15 > 0:04:19in his mind, a way that he's going to stay on top.If we look at the
0:04:19 > 0:04:24Times. Their angle, "Zimbabwe in despair" as Mugabe clings on. And
0:04:24 > 0:04:27we're expecting then to see more demonstrations on the streets
0:04:27 > 0:04:30because of course this, although it's a political story, it's very
0:04:30 > 0:04:34much a story of what the people of Zimbabwe are looking for as well?
0:04:34 > 0:04:38Yes, the war veterans. Everything pointed at the fact that he was
0:04:38 > 0:04:42going to go. No negotiations about how long he was going to go. And it
0:04:42 > 0:04:45just seems that there's a huge disappointment in the air and that
0:04:45 > 0:04:48is a really dangerous thing, because people are taking to the streets.
0:04:48 > 0:04:52They're going to want to say - but the military, you said this was
0:04:52 > 0:04:56going to happen, and it hasn't. And it's a coup, but it's not a coup.
0:04:56 > 0:05:00And that is the tipping point where it could turn into violence, and
0:05:00 > 0:05:03that's what everybody wants to avoid.Yes, it was noticeable, I
0:05:03 > 0:05:08thought, in his speech, he referred several times to the track record of
0:05:08 > 0:05:13Zimbabwe as a peaceable people, as if almost saying - this may not be
0:05:13 > 0:05:18what you're expecting everyone, but let's not get carried away and turn
0:05:18 > 0:05:22into riots on the street?This started as a palace coup, if it
0:05:22 > 0:05:26were. It wasn't a ground-up thing, although we've seen protests of that
0:05:26 > 0:05:29sort in Zimbabwe before. But now that the generals have started this
0:05:29 > 0:05:32process, even if they think that they can control it by putting
0:05:32 > 0:05:36someone else from Zanu-PF, Mugabe's former deputy in charge, actually,
0:05:36 > 0:05:39what the people on the streets are asking for is much more profound, a
0:05:39 > 0:05:43change in the economy, a change in how the country works. And that's
0:05:43 > 0:05:46quite different, and those two visions might be hard to reconcile.
0:05:46 > 0:05:51Take us back to the Guardian but we'll drop back to bottom of the
0:05:51 > 0:05:57page now. Hammond rules out £4 million cash emergency boost for the
0:05:57 > 0:06:01NHS. This looks at a lot of mutterings in there about what may
0:06:01 > 0:06:06or may not be in it, and the suggestion is that money for for the
0:06:06 > 0:06:11nation -- for the NHS, not.At this time, everybody brings out the
0:06:11 > 0:06:15begging bowl for something. And this seems from Simon Stevens is head of
0:06:15 > 0:06:22the NHS, who had said it needs the cash injection of $4 billion. And
0:06:22 > 0:06:27he's saying, no, I want reforms first - you should have done more to
0:06:27 > 0:06:31get the NHS in better shape. So it's kind of tit-for-tat. "You said you'd
0:06:31 > 0:06:35do something about social care, you said you'd get the NHS in better
0:06:35 > 0:06:40shape and then we can give you more money." And Simon Stevens says, you
0:06:40 > 0:06:43haven't done any of that. I suppose he's saying, why should I not ask
0:06:43 > 0:06:47for more money because you haven't done what you were supposed to do.
0:06:47 > 0:06:52So it is the toing and froing, but Hammond says everybody does this at
0:06:52 > 0:06:56this time of year.It's true that the horse trading is starting at
0:06:56 > 0:06:59this time of the budget and talking about house business and other
0:06:59 > 0:07:04things we might expect to see.The story shows how constrained Philip
0:07:04 > 0:07:07Hammond is coming into this. A lot of the MPs, bruised by the election
0:07:07 > 0:07:11result, say you need to loosen the belt a bit, particularly when it
0:07:11 > 0:07:15comes to the public sector, but Philip Hammond, leaving aside the
0:07:15 > 0:07:19fact that he's probably more economically dry than some of the
0:07:19 > 0:07:23MPs doesn't have that capacity and he seas saying to the NHS, you've
0:07:23 > 0:07:27got to find savings yourself because I've got a lot of other stuff on my
0:07:27 > 0:07:31plate.Let's stay with Philip Hammond because the Daily Telegraph
0:07:31 > 0:07:34over on the side there, he may be under pressure on one front, but
0:07:34 > 0:07:38also putting pressure, he says on Theresa May. And this is to do with
0:07:38 > 0:07:44money for the EU and specifically the divorce bill and the shenanigans
0:07:44 > 0:07:51going on about how much.We're back to this thing of - what do we want
0:07:51 > 0:07:55first. There's no "show me the money" which is what Brexit and the
0:07:55 > 0:07:59EU is saying. First of all, Philip Hammond and the rest want to know,
0:07:59 > 0:08:06what exactly are we going to be getting out of this? When then we
0:08:06 > 0:08:10can start talking about how much we're going to get. It's the
0:08:10 > 0:08:13ordinary people who are concerned. The money is large amounts of money,
0:08:13 > 0:08:17but this has been going on for so long and people are wondering - when
0:08:17 > 0:08:20are you going to talk about substance? Real issue that is impact
0:08:20 > 0:08:23upon us? People are making decisions about whether to stay in this
0:08:23 > 0:08:26country. Businesses, in particular, are making decisions, while they're
0:08:26 > 0:08:30still saying - well, we're not going to negotiate this until you tell us
0:08:30 > 0:08:33exactly how much money you're going to give us, and we're not going to
0:08:33 > 0:08:38give you as much money as you want until you tell us what you're going
0:08:38 > 0:08:41to get out of it. Stalemate, impasse.And the FT choosing to
0:08:41 > 0:08:46explore this story. May set to secure Cabinet support for a higher
0:08:46 > 0:08:50divorce bill offer and she may have her work cut out with some of the
0:08:50 > 0:08:54characters in her Cabinet?What this story explains well is that this
0:08:54 > 0:08:58isn't just a question about how much Britain is going to offer the EU,
0:08:58 > 0:09:01it's also a question about how divided Theresa May's Cabinet is, on
0:09:01 > 0:09:07Brexit but on much else. So there are basically two factions on the
0:09:07 > 0:09:11Brexit war Cabinet subcommittee that will decide whether they'll approve
0:09:11 > 0:09:17Theresa May doubling the offer from £20 million to £40 million. And on
0:09:17 > 0:09:21the one hand, Philip Hammond wants to make a generous offer and stay
0:09:21 > 0:09:24close. But on the other hand, you have Boris Johnson, the Foreign
0:09:24 > 0:09:29Secretary, and back in alliance with Michael Gove, the man who crushed
0:09:29 > 0:09:34Boris Johnson's hopes of leading the Tory Party. It is a multisided
0:09:34 > 0:09:39scenario. It's a psycho drama, some might say. And Theresa May, a more
0:09:39 > 0:09:42skilled politician than Theresa May would struggle to solve it. But she
0:09:42 > 0:09:45is certainly struggling.It's interesting, coming back to what you
0:09:45 > 0:09:49were say, Jacqui, about the politics of it, for the Westminster geeks,
0:09:49 > 0:09:53it's all very exciting for a lot of people watching and thinking - how
0:09:53 > 0:09:57is it that all these months in, we're still at stage one and the EU
0:09:57 > 0:10:01negotiators are saying, until this is sorted, we can't move on and we
0:10:01 > 0:10:07just seem to have got stuck?I think we got stuck because the division is
0:10:07 > 0:10:11- is our heart really in it? And the EU, I suppose, sent that. And maybe
0:10:11 > 0:10:15they are on our side, trying to make it as difficult as possible,
0:10:15 > 0:10:18thinking - they'll come to their senses. Once we've discussed this,
0:10:18 > 0:10:21they'll go - maybe. And then another thing, another thing. And then,
0:10:21 > 0:10:25Theresa May has this fractured Cabinet, which are pulling her this
0:10:25 > 0:10:29way and that way. And she's trying to negotiate her way through two
0:10:29 > 0:10:33things and finding it increasingly difficult. And Europe are just
0:10:33 > 0:10:36pulling their hair out going - look, we're talking about money. If you're
0:10:36 > 0:10:40not talking about anything else, we don't want to discuss it. Money
0:10:40 > 0:10:45first. Show us the money.While you're saying show us the money, the
0:10:45 > 0:10:49is beautiful there for Henry on the Daily Mail. Millions spied on by
0:10:49 > 0:10:53greedy top universities. What's this all about?It's a really interesting
0:10:53 > 0:10:58story, actually. So the Mail says that top universities, 24 of them,
0:10:58 > 0:11:03all of them in the Russell group, the top group of universities, have
0:11:03 > 0:11:06hired investigators to basically find out how rich all of their
0:11:06 > 0:11:10former students are. But it goes well beyond just income, it's also
0:11:10 > 0:11:13their investments, their pensions, who their friends are, the value of
0:11:13 > 0:11:18their homes. Now, on the one hand, this is a story about universities
0:11:18 > 0:11:23trying to get money to fund research and new buildings and all the stuff
0:11:23 > 0:11:26they do in the 21st century, but it's also a really interesting story
0:11:26 > 0:11:30about how much we put online these days. The Mail says there is a
0:11:30 > 0:11:35suggestion that some of them might have broken the law, but some of
0:11:35 > 0:11:38them, a sophisticated person with access to Google could find out
0:11:38 > 0:11:42themselves. So there is the question of - what are we putting out there?
0:11:42 > 0:11:45It might be just the universities trying to fine out, but there are
0:11:45 > 0:11:48other people who might like to know sometimes.Did this surprise you,
0:11:48 > 0:11:51Jacqui?No, it didn't, because universities have always used their
0:11:51 > 0:11:55alumni to try to fundraise, and in America, it's a very, very big
0:11:55 > 0:12:00thing. You know, if you've got very famous and very important alumni,
0:12:00 > 0:12:04you can build amazing things. So this is no surprise. I suppose, my
0:12:04 > 0:12:08one surprise is that they paid a firm to do this, when, as we said,
0:12:08 > 0:12:11there are a number of social media organisations that you could just
0:12:11 > 0:12:14quickly go online to tell you everything you need to know about
0:12:14 > 0:12:18these individuals.It's interesting that parallel you draw there with
0:12:18 > 0:12:22the States, because it's a huge thing in America. There's an
0:12:22 > 0:12:26expectation really that you give back to your old alma mater and I'm
0:12:26 > 0:12:30not sure that that is transferred across the pond there?I went to
0:12:30 > 0:12:33university in America and yes, you constantly get letters saying that
0:12:33 > 0:12:37now you're an alumni, would you consider making a monthly or
0:12:37 > 0:12:40whatever donation. So it is big business for the institution.We're
0:12:40 > 0:12:45going to finish with money, as well, because this is money for all of us,
0:12:45 > 0:12:50not just those who are being targeted by their old universities.
0:12:50 > 0:12:53The Daily Telegraph - Black Friday deals are not always what they seem.
0:12:53 > 0:12:57Are we going to be disappointed?The concept of Black Friday is an
0:12:57 > 0:13:02American import as well, so I suppose being doubly shafted by
0:13:02 > 0:13:05American culture tonight. This actually doesn't surprise me too
0:13:05 > 0:13:12much. It basically says that shoppers are predicted to spend £2.6
0:13:12 > 0:13:15billion, or £1.8 million per minute this Friday as part of Black Friday
0:13:15 > 0:13:19but some of the discounts aren't what they seem. That's not just the
0:13:19 > 0:13:22case on Black Friday. Sometimes in supermarket, you might see wine
0:13:22 > 0:13:27marketed at 40% off, but when you look into it, it was only that
0:13:27 > 0:13:30higher price for 15 minutes on the previous Friday. So it's basically a
0:13:30 > 0:13:35call on all of us to wise up and not necessarily get carried away with
0:13:35 > 0:13:40when we're told to shop and work out when's best to buy what you need.
0:13:40 > 0:13:45Because this is Which, the consumer group, who have looked at prices
0:13:45 > 0:13:48around Black Friday 2016 and monitored the prices up to Black
0:13:48 > 0:13:52Friday. Do we need to be a little bit less gullible?I think we do,
0:13:52 > 0:13:56but there are some savvy shoppers out there. But yes, you're right, we
0:13:56 > 0:13:59all look at something and go - great, 40% off. But sometimes
0:13:59 > 0:14:03there's a little in the small print that will say - from this period to
0:14:03 > 0:14:06this period, at some point, it was this price, so there's always been
0:14:06 > 0:14:11the issue that the price had gone up and then they discounted it, so were
0:14:11 > 0:14:14you getting a good deal? Just be careful what you wish for because
0:14:14 > 0:14:17it's not always correct.In two words, are you looking for anything
0:14:17 > 0:14:22on Black Friday?Possibility!Not saying what?Possibility a phone!
0:14:22 > 0:14:29OK, phone for Jacqui. Where will your bargain be?New TV to watch BBC
0:14:29 > 0:14:33favourites.You love it. Lots of Browny points. That's it for the
0:14:33 > 0:14:37papers. Thanks to Jacqui and Henry. All the front pages are online on
0:14:37 > 0:14:41the BBC News website. You can read a detailed review of the papers all
0:14:41 > 0:14:48there for you seven days a week at BBC.co. Uk slash papers. You can see
0:14:48 > 0:14:52us each day there with each night there shortly after we've finished
0:14:52 > 0:14:56and giving Henry a very large drink. Thank you, that's it from us for
0:14:56 > 0:15:00tonight. Coming up next, it's the Film Review.