0:00:01 > 0:00:02Jake Gill and hall stars in Stronger. His life is changed
0:00:02 > 0:00:09drastically since the Boston bombing. -- Gyllenhall. Coming up in
0:00:09 > 0:00:16the Phil Review. -- Film.
0:00:16 > 0:00:19Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be
0:00:19 > 0:00:20bringing us tomorrow.
0:00:20 > 0:00:22With me are the political commentator Jo Phillips
0:00:22 > 0:00:24and Nigel Nelson, political editor of the Sunday Mirror.
0:00:25 > 0:00:28Tomorrow's front pages, starting with...
0:00:28 > 0:00:33The Mail on Sunday reports that Theresa May had to intervene
0:00:33 > 0:00:35in a stand up row between the Defence Secretary
0:00:35 > 0:00:40and the Chancellor in the House of Commons.
0:00:40 > 0:00:43The Observer leads with a warning that the EU is under pressure not
0:00:43 > 0:00:47to give the UK a better trade deal than other non-member countries
0:00:47 > 0:00:49get after Brexit.
0:00:49 > 0:00:52The Sunday Express says leading Brexit supporting Mps want the UK
0:00:52 > 0:00:56to make clear it will walk away from any trade deal they don't think
0:00:57 > 0:01:00is good enough.
0:01:00 > 0:01:03The Sunday Telegraph goes with tensions within the Cabinet
0:01:03 > 0:01:06over the meaning of the commitments the Prime Minister made to move
0:01:06 > 0:01:07the Brexit talks on.
0:01:07 > 0:01:10And the Sunday Mirror reports that some delivery drivers are working 14
0:01:10 > 0:01:17hour days, it claims they're earning less than the minimum wage.
0:01:23 > 0:01:35Let keep off this hour with the Sunday express front page.This is a
0:01:35 > 0:01:38report that the Brexiteers are demanding the Theresa May should
0:01:38 > 0:01:45have demanded goldplated trade deal. If we don't get one then we say no
0:01:45 > 0:01:50more money and that's the end of it. In other words, a straightforward no
0:01:50 > 0:01:54deal and we would walk away. I'm not sure you can get away with doing no
0:01:54 > 0:01:59money. You can probably do less money. On the basis that if we did
0:01:59 > 0:02:05walk away, we would have to do it before 2019 when we're due to leave.
0:02:05 > 0:02:09One assumes the transition period wouldn't go ahead, you would save
0:02:09 > 0:02:14£20 billion that way. We would probably have to carry on paying for
0:02:14 > 0:02:19pensions as part of our obligations. Interesting about the story is we
0:02:19 > 0:02:23are getting to the next stage, really, which is what we actually
0:02:23 > 0:02:31want? The one thing Michel Barnier, Jean-Claude Juncker, Donald Tusk,
0:02:31 > 0:02:35all of them have been frustrated that Britain won't come forward with
0:02:35 > 0:02:40actually what we think the endgame is. Theresa May has a Brexit walk
0:02:40 > 0:02:44cabinet coming up to thrash it out but it is quite important now that
0:02:44 > 0:02:52when we go back to Europe, we have a clear idea of how we see our
0:02:52 > 0:02:56relationship after Brexit which we haven't got.The Sunday Express is
0:02:56 > 0:03:04quite a leash. They have them over of Durrell. -- bullish.This is what
0:03:04 > 0:03:15the Eurosceptics are clinging onto. -- barrel. That we did show signs to
0:03:15 > 0:03:19collaborate after the collapse of the TU P. That is to be welcomed if
0:03:19 > 0:03:29you to anything in an negotiation. -- DUP. They seem to think that just
0:03:29 > 0:03:34because we have got to this stage then we can turn around to the EU in
0:03:34 > 0:03:40six months or 18 months' Time and say actually we won't pay you. This
0:03:40 > 0:03:46is already cementing, as if it needs any more cement, the hard lines
0:03:46 > 0:03:52between the Brexiteers and the Remainers. It all comes down to this
0:03:52 > 0:03:57thing, in the event of no deal, the UK will maintain full alignment with
0:03:57 > 0:04:00the customs union and the single market when it comes to the Irish
0:04:00 > 0:04:07border. And continuing to abide by all of the EU's will. It is all
0:04:07 > 0:04:14about semantics. It is a positive headline for the Prime Minister,
0:04:14 > 0:04:22probably, but very...The full alignment phrase, moving on, Texas
0:04:22 > 0:04:27to the Sunday Telegraph. Much reference there about the talk in
0:04:27 > 0:04:35the Cabinet. -- takes us to the Sunday Telegraph.If you can say
0:04:35 > 0:04:41that by sending Boris Johnson to Iran, that keep him out of the way,
0:04:41 > 0:04:46that is one way of looking at it. There is a problem between the
0:04:46 > 0:04:50Brexiteers and the Remainers. The Brexiteers are so keen to walk away
0:04:50 > 0:04:56from Europe that they would almost, you know, do anything just to be
0:04:56 > 0:05:00able to say, we have done it, we have done it, we are out of Europe,
0:05:00 > 0:05:04regardless of the consequences. That comes back to the point that Nigel
0:05:04 > 0:05:07made that it is difficult for the Prime Minister and the negotiating
0:05:07 > 0:05:11team and it is not just David Davis, it is an army of civil servants and
0:05:11 > 0:05:15lawyers and what have you. It is difficult for them to go there if it
0:05:15 > 0:05:21is not clear what we want.Now we get to the next stage which is we
0:05:21 > 0:05:25ought to be honest because if we can lay on the table, at the moment,
0:05:25 > 0:05:28we're not saying anything. We are arguing that we must keep
0:05:28 > 0:05:33negotiating position close to a chest. Now we are moving into trade
0:05:33 > 0:05:37talks and the question is why should we? Let's say this is what we want,
0:05:37 > 0:05:42we then negotiate to get there and see how far we go but at least if
0:05:42 > 0:05:46you utterly knew what we were going towards... We would speed up the
0:05:46 > 0:05:53negotiations but it would be the best way of helping both sides come
0:05:53 > 0:05:58to some kind of deal.Because they have been negotiating on these three
0:05:58 > 0:06:03issues which we have gotten past, to a degree, only now would it be the
0:06:03 > 0:06:07right moment to say this is what we want in the future. If that is their
0:06:07 > 0:06:11argument? S there is a point you have to take it step-by-step and I
0:06:11 > 0:06:19always knew Northern Ireland will be a major sticking point.-- there is
0:06:19 > 0:06:24a point you have to take. You have to do a bit by bit but you have to
0:06:24 > 0:06:32know what your endgame is.Talking of truces or not, Nigel, this is the
0:06:32 > 0:06:37Mail on Sunday which is talking about a bust up.This was an all out
0:06:37 > 0:06:42war and it was between the Defence Secretary David Williamson and the
0:06:42 > 0:06:45Chancellor Philip Hammond. According to the Mail on Sunday, their
0:06:45 > 0:06:49simmering feud, as they put it, turned into a full-scale shouting
0:06:49 > 0:06:57match. Dependent on which side you listen to, it seems that Gavin
0:06:57 > 0:07:03Williamson thinks the Chancellor wants to cut the army down to
0:07:03 > 0:07:0850,000. The chancellor says he doesn't want to do this at all. We
0:07:08 > 0:07:17then get insults thrown both ways. They went toe to toe in the Commons.
0:07:17 > 0:07:25It sounds like dancing.The Chancellor calls Gavin Williamson...
0:07:25 > 0:07:30I don't think it is the Chancellor, I think it is people in his
0:07:30 > 0:07:38department.This is his description of him.Pike as in Dad's Army.The
0:07:38 > 0:07:45stupid boy. We have this full-scale row and the backdrop to this, of
0:07:45 > 0:07:49course, is whether or not Gavin Williamson is thinking in terms of
0:07:49 > 0:07:57succeeding Theresa May when she finally goes.Well! And neat segue.
0:07:57 > 0:08:01Simon Walters, political editor of the Mail on Sunday has actually done
0:08:01 > 0:08:06exactly this and point out the remarkable similarity between the
0:08:06 > 0:08:11Gavin Williamson's meteoric rise into the Cabinet to that is John
0:08:11 > 0:08:18Major in 1990. Then you had Margaret Thatcher with the blonde bombshell
0:08:18 > 0:08:24Michael Heseltine seen as her net -- natural successor. She would have
0:08:24 > 0:08:32rather had anything happen than that. Now you have the same with
0:08:32 > 0:08:38Gavin Williamson. Interestingly, it is said in other reports that he has
0:08:38 > 0:08:42now aligned himself with Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, giving a
0:08:42 > 0:08:51majority, albeit a slim one, to the Brexiteers in the Cabinet. You know,
0:08:51 > 0:08:56he is siding with dubious people. Let's move on and talk of other
0:08:56 > 0:09:02things. Among them, fast tracked degrees. It takes us back to the
0:09:02 > 0:09:05Telegraph and it is the suggestion that they ought to be two-year
0:09:05 > 0:09:09degrees rather than three.Yes, I think a lot of people would think it
0:09:09 > 0:09:15is a jolly good idea. Now, this is not least of all, it would save a
0:09:15 > 0:09:17considerable amount of money. It would also get people into
0:09:17 > 0:09:22employment a lot quicker. But I think what is significant is that
0:09:22 > 0:09:29this is about universities having to offer more value for money.It is as
0:09:29 > 0:09:34well as three.Exactly. But it is a choice you can take and it will be
0:09:34 > 0:09:40unveiled by the government tomorrow, and Joe Johnson who is the
0:09:40 > 0:09:45universities minister thinks it is skewed in favour of traditional
0:09:45 > 0:09:51degrees and offers a pitifully low number of courses. This comes at a
0:09:51 > 0:09:56time when there is an enormous fury over the vast salaries being paid to
0:09:56 > 0:10:01vice chancellors and senior university staff. Because if you
0:10:01 > 0:10:05introduce fees, you are then putting students in the role of consumers
0:10:05 > 0:10:09and therefore they will expect more for their money. This is a good way
0:10:09 > 0:10:13of seeing whether they can get it. The figure suggested is quite
0:10:13 > 0:10:20significant.It is suggesting that it would save the students £25,000.
0:10:20 > 0:10:25It is a bit of a sleight of hand because you would save 5500 on
0:10:25 > 0:10:31tuition fees although you would be paying 20% more for each year. That
0:10:31 > 0:10:37it still gives you 5500 and you get this extra money besides you won't
0:10:37 > 0:10:41have to take out a maintenance loan fee of third-year is the fact that
0:10:41 > 0:10:49most students get a job afterwards. 19,000 is the average amount.I will
0:10:49 > 0:10:52squeeze to mooring in the last 2.5 minutes. Civil partnerships to go
0:10:52 > 0:10:58straight. Something that has been speculated upon for a while.Indeed.
0:10:58 > 0:11:05Again, absolutely right. A private members bill. The idea is to try and
0:11:05 > 0:11:09basically bring the law into line for both heterosexual and homosexual
0:11:09 > 0:11:15couples. Very sensible. It should have been done a while ago. The only
0:11:15 > 0:11:18reason that heterosexual couples couldn't enter into civil
0:11:18 > 0:11:27partnerships was the argument that gay couples were in civil
0:11:27 > 0:11:30partnerships because they couldn't get married and of course now they
0:11:30 > 0:11:35can get married and this is simply a matter of equality so everyone's
0:11:35 > 0:11:39then can either have a civil partnership or get married.And it's
0:11:39 > 0:11:43sensible for all those reasons but also it actually makes it a lot
0:11:43 > 0:11:47easier for cohabiting couples to put things on a much better footing in
0:11:47 > 0:11:56terms of pension rights and wheels, property. -- wills to stop people
0:11:56 > 0:12:01make the mistake that because people have lived together for 100 years
0:12:01 > 0:12:08they are treated as a married couple and they are not. -- wills. It is
0:12:08 > 0:12:12Charles Keaton and Rebecca Stone fell to have their case held next
0:12:12 > 0:12:21year. I know we shouldn't promote other channels but those of us in
0:12:21 > 0:12:30political circles are familiar with the political editor of ITN. On
0:12:30 > 0:12:37first-class, I thought this was Tom Bradley. I'm sure it's not, but it
0:12:37 > 0:12:45is a man dressing after apparently emerging...Thomas is that mad.He
0:12:45 > 0:12:50was probably looking at Brexit. Why would you go into the Serpentine in
0:12:50 > 0:12:53Hyde Park in any freezing temperatures yesterday in London? I
0:12:53 > 0:12:57don't know but it is a good photograph and the lady next to him
0:12:57 > 0:13:01looks like she is ignoring it and she is quite used to seeing it.She
0:13:01 > 0:13:06is more appropriately dressed.Have either of you being tempted at this
0:13:06 > 0:13:13time of year?Know but I do live on the coast and date to have a friend
0:13:13 > 0:13:18who goes swimming at least once a week regardless of the weather.
0:13:18 > 0:13:23Hasn't appeared yet on the front of the Sunday Times.It is not
0:13:23 > 0:13:31newsworthy.That is it for the papers this hour. Thanks to Jo and
0:13:31 > 0:13:32Nigel.
0:13:32 > 0:13:35Coming up next, it's the Film Review.