0:00:18 > 0:00:22Hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing
0:00:22 > 0:00:32us tomorrow. With ask, is Tim Stanley, and Suzy Boniface. Many
0:00:32 > 0:00:41tomorrow's front pages are already in. The news that the US Congress
0:00:41 > 0:00:47released a memo has made many of the front pages, but it did meet the
0:00:47 > 0:00:52front page of the Financial Times. That story also gets a brief mention
0:00:52 > 0:00:56on the front of the Guardian, but the paper's top story is a closer
0:00:56 > 0:01:01look too much of the processed foods that we eat. The Telegraph leads on
0:01:01 > 0:01:06Government plans for heterosexual couples to be offered civil
0:01:06 > 0:01:10partnerships, which are currently only available to insects couples.
0:01:10 > 0:01:19The paper also celebrates the land reunion of the Spice Girls. The
0:01:19 > 0:01:36Mirror claims Amy MAC -- AMD waiting... The number of prostate
0:01:36 > 0:01:41cancer deaths overtook the number of breast cancer deaths in women for
0:01:41 > 0:01:44the first time. The paper is suggesting that more money needs to
0:01:44 > 0:01:49be spent on tackling Bostick cancer. The Times lead on plans for a
0:01:49 > 0:01:53crackdown on Russian oligarchs, who will be forced to spend their luxury
0:01:53 > 0:02:06lifestyle in this country. So, no real consensus on which one story is
0:02:06 > 0:02:09topping the front pages, but plenty of different services that the
0:02:09 > 0:02:18weekend. -- subjects. Let's start with the FT, which is the one paper
0:02:18 > 0:02:22which has picked up on this memo that has been seizing the headlines
0:02:22 > 0:02:27this evening. Tim, I know that you have read it, what you make of it?
0:02:27 > 0:02:32What you make of what the FDA have said?This is contradicted, buckle
0:02:32 > 0:02:37up. We all know that there is a investigation going on into the top
0:02:37 > 0:02:43campaign's links with Russia. That is the background. The Republicans,
0:02:43 > 0:02:46in an effort to fight back politically, have released a memo
0:02:46 > 0:02:52which charges that the FBI's seeking of a wire tap on an important member
0:02:52 > 0:02:58of the Trump campaign, they say that when a sword that wiretap, they
0:02:58 > 0:03:03didn't make certain important thing is clear. So, they didn't make clear
0:03:03 > 0:03:06where the allegations were coming from, they didn't make it clear
0:03:06 > 0:03:12solution as they put it with the Democrats. In other words, the
0:03:12 > 0:03:17Republicans are trying to undermine the FBI's investigation, or at least
0:03:17 > 0:03:20trying to give the impression that there was political, and media
0:03:20 > 0:03:28buyers in the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign. Frankly, the
0:03:28 > 0:03:33memo doesn't change very much. There are other investigations going on
0:03:33 > 0:03:37off top's campaign, and there are some allegations which members of
0:03:37 > 0:03:41the campaign have already admitted to. For instance, we know that there
0:03:41 > 0:03:44was a meeting between the Russians and Donald Trump Jr. It doesn't
0:03:44 > 0:03:49change any of that. What it does do, it politically, is it gives Donald
0:03:49 > 0:03:54Trump a weapon, something that will mobilise his supporters, saying that
0:03:54 > 0:03:57I have evidence, that this was not just about finding out the truth
0:03:57 > 0:04:01between me and Russia, this was about using the Democrats using the
0:04:01 > 0:04:18services to get at me.What a tangle.It slurs and slurs. There is
0:04:18 > 0:04:23the Christopher steel dossier, to discredit time. They are using at as
0:04:23 > 0:04:26a basis for an investigation, without pointing out that many part
0:04:26 > 0:04:31of that dossier have been verified and known to be true. The fact that
0:04:31 > 0:04:35this particular investigation was started before the stud dossier was
0:04:35 > 0:04:42even Britain, 2013. -- even written. It is just a way that Donald Trump
0:04:42 > 0:04:49can distract his normal technique of AIDS dead cat on the table. What is
0:04:49 > 0:04:55interesting, is that if you are a Trump supporter, it confirms -- a
0:04:55 > 0:05:00dead cat on the table. When that dossier was first released and
0:05:00 > 0:05:06published online, you said it was disgraceful. It was unverified, it
0:05:06 > 0:05:13was unproven. And here we are, the President of the United States,
0:05:13 > 0:05:18publishing a similarly unproven memo, which doesn't prove anything
0:05:18 > 0:05:23at all. He is saying that it is shocking and shameful, as though it
0:05:23 > 0:05:27is definitely true. It is more madness. It is another thing... You
0:05:27 > 0:05:31know, how mad has he got to be before anybody would actually change
0:05:31 > 0:05:35their opinion about in one way or the other? An I agree with a lot of
0:05:35 > 0:05:40that. I did entirely agree on whether or not that memo shows is
0:05:40 > 0:05:48significant.It is significant if it turns out that the Democrats
0:05:48 > 0:05:59financed some of the staff which was then used as the justification...
0:05:59 > 0:06:04Only if that dossier was true. If the facts are correct, it doesn't
0:06:04 > 0:06:09matter who paid for it.One thing that is for certain, is that this is
0:06:09 > 0:06:14a row that is going to continue... In the pursuit of justice, if you
0:06:14 > 0:06:19drop procedure, it doesn't matter if you are guilty, or not. If yorkers
0:06:19 > 0:06:24should choose no rights have been violated, they have been violated.
0:06:24 > 0:06:32-- if your constitutional rights. Exactly. It is because the FBI are
0:06:32 > 0:06:38going so Katherine dotting every tea and -- -- going so carefully and
0:06:38 > 0:06:45causing every tea and dotting every eye.Let's just look at the Daily
0:06:45 > 0:06:50Telegraph. Biggest marriage is shake-up in 200 years.Yes, you may
0:06:50 > 0:06:56or member when I was a very young child, the new Labour Government
0:06:56 > 0:06:58introduced the partnerships legislation, which allowed gay
0:06:58 > 0:07:02people to get a civil partnership. At the time, it was argued that this
0:07:02 > 0:07:06would be extended to her to sections, as well. So that you could
0:07:06 > 0:07:09get sisters, getting married, or whatever, so that they would get the
0:07:09 > 0:07:15same inheritance rights, host of like that. And then, you have got
0:07:15 > 0:07:18gay marriage, and every thing moved on. Now, what is happening is that
0:07:18 > 0:07:25the Government is looking at introducing those rights to get a...
0:07:25 > 0:07:30You have a civil partnership for acceptance, too. This is a genuinely
0:07:30 > 0:07:37egalitarian move, those who are arguing for it, would say. Urnthe
0:07:37 > 0:07:41quality? Importance that? Will it make a huge Hibiscusprobably not.
0:07:41 > 0:07:46The claim that it is the biggest shake-up in 200 years, I would claim
0:07:46 > 0:07:51that is hyperbole. Although it is the claim that it is the change of a
0:07:51 > 0:07:54state -based marriage as opposed to a church -based marriage, P was the
0:07:54 > 0:07:57get married, who was get divorced, and your marriage are still the
0:07:57 > 0:08:10life. Not signing the register, at the time, but... These are the first
0:08:10 > 0:08:14shake-ups to the way that we register marriages. Since 1837, and
0:08:14 > 0:08:17many people would argue that life has changed, people have changed,
0:08:17 > 0:08:23and of course we could change things, since 1837.This is only
0:08:23 > 0:08:27going to effect a relatively small number of heterosexual couples who
0:08:27 > 0:08:32want this option of a civil partnership. Don't want to go
0:08:32 > 0:08:37through the whole business of having a religious ceremony. Plenty of
0:08:37 > 0:08:41people get married in a registry office.Yes, exactly. I struggle to
0:08:41 > 0:08:47see the difference. What a marriages, is a state's recognition
0:08:47 > 0:08:50of the union. If you need to do so union, you need to have the
0:08:50 > 0:08:55proceedings of a state involved in order to separate it and dissolve
0:08:55 > 0:08:59it. It is just another way of the state saying, we will control your
0:08:59 > 0:09:08relationship in some respect.The conservative counter argument, of
0:09:08 > 0:09:12course, is that this is part of a long move, an arc toward undermining
0:09:12 > 0:09:19what marriage was. 15 years ago, which was MPB union of a man and a
0:09:19 > 0:09:24woman. The evidence still suggests that marriages last longer, and
0:09:24 > 0:09:29better for children. There was research done which found that one
0:09:29 > 0:09:32in five couples who were cohabiting, were no longer living together by
0:09:32 > 0:09:40the time their child had reached the age of three, versus one in 20, in
0:09:40 > 0:09:43couples where they are married. There is an observable difference in
0:09:43 > 0:09:46getting married and having a civil partnership, and it seems that
0:09:46 > 0:09:55getting married lasts longer. The conservative argument would be that
0:09:55 > 0:09:58if you incredible partnership, you will encourage the further dilation
0:09:58 > 0:10:03of traditional marriage.That have a look at the e-mail, it has been very
0:10:03 > 0:10:08taken... The second headline in a row on this revelation about the
0:10:08 > 0:10:16increasing incidences of prostate cancer in men. The mail seems to be
0:10:16 > 0:10:20seizing on this to say, let's have some more funding to look into this.
0:10:20 > 0:10:26Yes, and it is drawing a lot of comparisons with rest cancer, which
0:10:26 > 0:10:30is not quite reasonable, because while there are some aggressive
0:10:30 > 0:10:35prostate cancers, there are many which are not aggressive. Because,
0:10:35 > 0:10:39they will get it when they are 75, serving as will carry them off
0:10:39 > 0:10:43before the prostate Cancer manages to do any damage. So, the argument
0:10:43 > 0:10:48here, is because there are roughly 11,000 deaths from breast cancer and
0:10:48 > 0:10:50prostate cancer, and the rate of mortality for both is dropping. We
0:10:50 > 0:10:55are curing people with both, it's just that we are curing people with
0:10:55 > 0:10:58breast cancer figure, that we are with prostate cancer. They are
0:10:58 > 0:11:01saying that we should spend more money on the prostate cancer. They
0:11:01 > 0:11:05are not suggesting where the money should come from. It has got to come
0:11:05 > 0:11:09from somewhere other than the NHS, and I think the issue may be men not
0:11:09 > 0:11:12reporting symptoms which means that they would get their prostate
0:11:12 > 0:11:16screening tests on their GP. Problems with your knitting, and
0:11:16 > 0:11:23other issues which should mean that they should go and see their GP. Men
0:11:23 > 0:11:27should be doing that and getting diagnosed, sooner.It is interesting
0:11:27 > 0:11:31that at the moment, there doesn't seem to be a national programme of
0:11:31 > 0:11:40greening for prostate cancer, where as of course, breast cancer women of
0:11:40 > 0:11:47-- women of is that major invited to go for one.Men are also living
0:11:47 > 0:11:54longer, and the longer you live, the more likely you are to get it. Right
0:11:54 > 0:11:58now, it is essentially elective, if you wanted over the age of 50, you
0:11:58 > 0:12:03can go on request, you can get it. But, I do think it is true, that
0:12:03 > 0:12:06there is a lot of cultural awareness and discussion of breast cancer.
0:12:06 > 0:12:11There isn't so much of prostate. I am not saying it is a fight between
0:12:11 > 0:12:14the two. I'm just saying that perhaps then used to be among men,
0:12:14 > 0:12:24and when it comes to men's health, greater conversation.Women are a
0:12:24 > 0:12:38little bit more comfortable to talking about boobs.I'm not asking
0:12:38 > 0:12:42for directions.I just wonder whether we should move on on that
0:12:42 > 0:12:46note, and wonder if there's any connection the Guardian's front
0:12:46 > 0:12:50page. This is about eating processed food. As a victim Richard thing that
0:12:50 > 0:12:55we are all now taken up by this healthy living campaigns, but
0:12:55 > 0:12:58apparently we are all eating processed food.The Guardian has
0:12:58 > 0:13:06done a surprising front page, reported that over half of the food
0:13:06 > 0:13:10that we eat is ultra processed. If you think about the fact that milk
0:13:10 > 0:13:15comes out of cows, and the process to bump cheese. And then, it is
0:13:15 > 0:13:20older processed to put the cheese with the butter on a jacket potato.
0:13:20 > 0:13:27Resisting it more than once is not necessarily mean a bad thing. This
0:13:27 > 0:13:31survey, is comparing surveys from different countries carried out at
0:13:31 > 0:13:35different times, using different methodologies. So, it is not
0:13:35 > 0:13:39scientific, there is no real basis in fact. It seems to have been led
0:13:39 > 0:13:45by a university in Brazil, and it complains about people using
0:13:45 > 0:13:50processed foods, but we don't want to do without custard creams, do we?
0:13:50 > 0:13:56Well, apparently, we are all eating salty snacks, she agrees Syria's,
0:13:56 > 0:14:06industrial made -- sugary cereals. Industrial made bread.There is an
0:14:06 > 0:14:17advert above it for pumpernickel ice creams. It looks delicious. That
0:14:17 > 0:14:27sounds processed. We are ahead of Europeans. If there is anything in
0:14:27 > 0:14:31it, I suspect it comes down to not enough people cook with fresh
0:14:31 > 0:14:35ingredients. I know that I don't. I am probably something like 90%
0:14:35 > 0:14:42processed foods. A lot of us did have the time.It is extremely that
0:14:42 > 0:14:53the Guardian expends those strange
0:14:57 > 0:15:02juxtaposition of Ottalenghi, who has all of these incredible recipes, and
0:15:02 > 0:15:04all the different ingredients. Nigella MAC I don't have time for
0:15:04 > 0:15:12that. I ain't eating that.Celebrity recipes is one of my personal
0:15:12 > 0:15:20bugbears. You can look at the recipe, or and it will contain at
0:15:20 > 0:15:23least three ingredients that you never heard of. I bet you any money,
0:15:23 > 0:15:28no one in Britain, this weekend, are prepared to state a kidney on this,
0:15:28 > 0:15:32-- I'm prepared to stake a kidney on this, is going to make pumpernickel
0:15:32 > 0:15:38ice cream. Nobody. No one. If we were doing newspaper recipes
0:15:38 > 0:15:47anywhere as an television... If we as she did, this is why we make a
0:15:47 > 0:15:53reasonable cheese sandwich. This is how you make a pot of tea, I think
0:15:53 > 0:15:57people like Tim would have more education about how to cook from
0:15:57 > 0:16:04fresh, how to cook from scratch, how to do a roast chicken.Delia got in
0:16:04 > 0:16:10a lot of trouble when she started trying to tell us how to boil an.
0:16:10 > 0:16:18You are not supposed to eat the Telegraph.There is a bit of
0:16:18 > 0:16:22politics that into the front page. That is talking about how three of
0:16:22 > 0:16:34the leading Brexiteers any cabinet are apparently going to come
0:16:39 > 0:16:43out and,... I thought Theresa May had said that we would not have one.
0:16:43 > 0:16:46The idea is that we are going for a bespoke trade deal. The problem is
0:16:46 > 0:16:52not so much of what we end up with, it is the Government's ability to be
0:16:52 > 0:16:57clear about it -- inability to be clear about it. It is astonishing
0:16:57 > 0:17:00that we are still having this conversation, 18 months after the
0:17:00 > 0:17:05referendum. A year after Theresa May became leader. People are still
0:17:05 > 0:17:10raising questions like we going to be in the customs union a customs
0:17:10 > 0:17:15union, are we going to have Canada plus, plus, plus, plus. To be fair
0:17:15 > 0:17:18to Theresa May, everything just got to do, she has gotten them navigate
0:17:18 > 0:17:23through that tiny majority, and you've got to get the EU to agree to
0:17:23 > 0:17:34whatever she's asking for, it is extraordinary.She's not doing
0:17:34 > 0:17:42anything about Brexit, she is literally having to sought out and
0:17:42 > 0:17:46play off Remainers and hard Brexiteers, and try and keep them
0:17:46 > 0:17:50all roughly in shape. The same thing would be happening in the
0:17:50 > 0:17:53Conservative Party of shadow majority of 134. This is how the
0:17:53 > 0:17:56Tories have been of this rating themselves for 40 years and they are
0:17:56 > 0:18:00carrying on doing it now. We are known having any sort of Brexit,
0:18:00 > 0:18:05then we were on the day the referendum.Now, we will very
0:18:05 > 0:18:09briefly touched on the other big picture, here. The Spice Girls back
0:18:09 > 0:18:12together, is this going to be a powerful new demonstration of girl
0:18:12 > 0:18:19power?Well know, because they are not girls.That was the phrase at
0:18:19 > 0:18:24the time. I didn't mean that.I know. They are getting 50 million in
0:18:24 > 0:18:27order to not sing, because they are going to be having a TV show, and
0:18:27 > 0:18:33releasing their old hits. I am happy to bathe and not to sing. I'm
0:18:33 > 0:18:39absolutely delighted about that. Tim, you will be delighted to see
0:18:39 > 0:18:44the Spice Girls? Sylla and very lighted to spice up my life. Puzzle,
0:18:44 > 0:18:49it is unusual is it not for a woman scooped a like this, and secondly,
0:18:49 > 0:18:55from what I can remember, they were the last band that sang songs that
0:18:55 > 0:19:03had catchy cheese.You have not heard of Take Thatthis was the 90s.
0:19:03 > 0:19:10I was about three when they were in the charts.Out of it for the
0:19:10 > 0:19:19papers, tonight. Don't forget, you can seek the papers online. If you
0:19:19 > 0:19:24mist the programme any ring, you can watch it later. My thanks to Tim
0:19:24 > 0:19:30Stanley, and now it is time for the weather with Philip.