0:00:15 > 0:00:18Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be
0:00:18 > 0:00:19bringing us tomorrow.
0:00:19 > 0:00:21With me are The New Statesman's special correspondent,
0:00:21 > 0:00:23Stephen Bush and Rosamund Urwin, Financial Services correspondent
0:00:23 > 0:00:25at the Sunday Times.
0:00:25 > 0:00:28Many of tomorrow's front pages are already in.
0:00:28 > 0:00:35The FT leads with more on the pressure being placed
0:00:35 > 0:00:38on Facebook to explain allegations that data from millions of its users
0:00:38 > 0:00:40helped President Trump win the US election.
0:00:40 > 0:00:42The Guardian also has that story.
0:00:42 > 0:00:45It says an investigation has been launched into possible data breaches
0:00:45 > 0:00:49committed by the firm Cambridge Analytica,
0:00:49 > 0:00:52which was used by Donald Trump's election campaign.
0:00:52 > 0:00:55Both Cambridge Analytica and Facebook deny any wrongdoing.
0:00:55 > 0:00:59The Metro has more on the Foreign Secretary's rejection of claims made
0:00:59 > 0:01:03by Russia that the chemical used to poison Sergei and Yulia Skripal
0:01:03 > 0:01:07was made in the UK.
0:01:07 > 0:01:10The I reports on President Putin's landslide election win tonight
0:01:10 > 0:01:13along with his reaction to the dispute over the origin
0:01:13 > 0:01:16of the nerve agent used in Salisbury.
0:01:16 > 0:01:19The Telegraph has details on plans by the government to introduce
0:01:19 > 0:01:24stricter regulations and taxation on tech giants operating in Britain.
0:01:24 > 0:01:27The Times says the gambling watchdog is to relax its drastic
0:01:27 > 0:01:31recommendation to limit stakes on fixed-odds betting machines.
0:01:31 > 0:01:35The Mirror reports on the arrest of TV presenter Ant McPartlin
0:01:35 > 0:01:39after he was allegedly involved in a car accident in south-west
0:01:39 > 0:01:40London.
0:01:40 > 0:01:44And the Sun is leading on that story too.
0:01:44 > 0:01:51It says the star was arrested on suspicion of drink driving.
0:01:51 > 0:01:55So a fair old spread of different stories on the front pages but, of
0:01:55 > 0:01:59course, Russia is never far away and that is where we will begin with the
0:01:59 > 0:02:04times. A landslide victory to put on thanks to Britain and the suggestion
0:02:04 > 0:02:08is that the confrontation with Britain over various matters has
0:02:08 > 0:02:14boosted and bolstered the victory that Vladimir Putin is enjoying.
0:02:14 > 0:02:21That is what people have said, that some analysis of saying that it
0:02:21 > 0:02:25turned out to be a boost. Ultimately, the main factor in this
0:02:25 > 0:02:29election was that Vladimir Putin was able to choose his opponent, and
0:02:29 > 0:02:33effectively was able to run the rules of the election. His main
0:02:33 > 0:02:37opponent was this hard because of a fraud conviction that he says was
0:02:37 > 0:02:44false. I don't really think that Britain's reaction one way or
0:02:44 > 0:02:48another has been that important, not the least because it had Britain not
0:02:48 > 0:02:51reacted at all than he would have looked even stronger going into the
0:02:51 > 0:02:55election. I don't really see what else we might have done.The fact
0:02:55 > 0:03:02that turnout dropped from 65 to 60% is being commented upon.There is a
0:03:02 > 0:03:10lovely line in this from a spokesperson for the campaign. I
0:03:10 > 0:03:16would like to thank the UK for helping with this high turnout which
0:03:16 > 0:03:20we ourselves could not have dreamt of. Of course, that could quite
0:03:20 > 0:03:24easily have they meet this happened. One of the things that they did if
0:03:24 > 0:03:28they offered little incentive to come out and vote. Coffee,
0:03:28 > 0:03:34chocolate, whatever. Of course it is the only way people can oppose
0:03:34 > 0:03:40Hooton's re- election, I not voting at all. That is what you do when you
0:03:40 > 0:03:47have no choice on the ballot paper. If it is down to 60%, I think that
0:03:47 > 0:03:52was two hours before polls closed, so there is a chance the roads, but
0:03:52 > 0:03:57if it is that then that is a slight dent in his otherwise unstoppable
0:03:57 > 0:04:07six more years.Looking at the sun. Piles of poison. The Foreign
0:04:07 > 0:04:11Secretary saying that Russia has been stockpiling the nerve agent for
0:04:11 > 0:04:15quite sometime. I think this was Boris this morning.He is saying
0:04:15 > 0:04:25exactly that that they are stock stock boiling -- stockpiling it. The
0:04:25 > 0:04:30suggestion was that it might come from within the UK. But Boris
0:04:30 > 0:04:36Johnson says that the trail does lead inevitably to the Kremlin.And
0:04:36 > 0:04:42the Daily Telegraph goes one further without saying that Russian
0:04:42 > 0:04:47dissident bodies could be exhumed to test for Novichok. They want to look
0:04:47 > 0:04:54for traces of it.There have been various people critical of what you
0:04:54 > 0:04:59put's regime who have lived here in the UK and died in mysterious
0:04:59 > 0:05:02circumstances. The Telegraph is suggesting that some of these people
0:05:02 > 0:05:06will be dug up and have their bodies tested for the presence of this
0:05:06 > 0:05:09nerve agent. Because it is undetectable in its preprepared
0:05:09 > 0:05:15form. So you have two harmless agents that are only deadly when
0:05:15 > 0:05:20combined, it could be some people who have been attacked with it and
0:05:20 > 0:05:23we have not noticed until now. The Telegraph suggests that we will dig
0:05:23 > 0:05:28it up. If that happens, that puts the government in a bind because at
0:05:28 > 0:05:31the moment they have expelled 23 diplomats and there has been some
0:05:31 > 0:05:35tit-for-tat expulsion. At that point, if things start to escalate
0:05:35 > 0:05:39it is not clear what the British government can do that will not
0:05:39 > 0:05:42leave them looking weak and unable to respond to the Russian
0:05:42 > 0:05:50government.Moving on to look at Facebook and, more widely technology
0:05:50 > 0:05:54firms to dig the Guardian, firstly. Pressure on Facebook and data firm
0:05:54 > 0:06:00over a mass breach of personal data files. This is that Cambridge
0:06:00 > 0:06:08Analytica. And a reporter who has been looking at them for quite some
0:06:08 > 0:06:12time with some deep investigation, what is the suggestion here?The
0:06:12 > 0:06:18suggestion is that data was improperly obtained by Cambridge
0:06:18 > 0:06:22Analytica under the cover of being for research purposes. It was
0:06:22 > 0:06:25actually used to make advertisers and influence the American
0:06:25 > 0:06:32presidential election. Alexander Nix testified to the Commons Select
0:06:32 > 0:06:35Committee in the past and he is now being accused of being economical
0:06:35 > 0:06:40with the truth. He and Mark Zuckerberg will be callback to
0:06:40 > 0:06:44account for how Facebook keeps control of the user's data and
0:06:44 > 0:06:51prevents it from being used in ways we may not like.Both organisations
0:06:51 > 0:06:56and Facebook say that we have done nothing wrong at all. But it is
0:06:56 > 0:07:00quite sensitive, the use of people's data. We are supposed to give our
0:07:00 > 0:07:05consent for how it is used.I always wonder if this is one of those
0:07:05 > 0:07:10things that really splits people. Some people do seem to be rather
0:07:10 > 0:07:13blase about how their data is used, actually. And then there is another
0:07:13 > 0:07:18group of us who really feel that this is a pressing issue of our time
0:07:18 > 0:07:22that needs addressing. I think we will see a lot more scrutiny of the
0:07:22 > 0:07:27tech firms in this regard. And I think we will, you know, the whole
0:07:27 > 0:07:33thing of their original sort of slightly idealistic fix the world...
0:07:33 > 0:07:36This is where it turns. It actually says OK, we have some real problems
0:07:36 > 0:07:41with the way this operates -- companies operate. We have things
0:07:41 > 0:07:46like this where it comes out and we have a light shone on them and they
0:07:46 > 0:07:50do not look great.That leads us nicely to the Telegraph and the wild
0:07:50 > 0:07:55West era of technology firms. A cabinet minister responsible for
0:07:55 > 0:07:59overseeing them says that things will get more difficult. How?This
0:07:59 > 0:08:07is not just about regulation. It is also talking about tax cost, of
0:08:07 > 0:08:12course, many of these companies not only have gotten away with a
0:08:12 > 0:08:16regulation like existence for a while, I have also not paid much in
0:08:16 > 0:08:21the way of corporation tax. And so he is talking about looking at the
0:08:21 > 0:08:28way they operate, the major technology firms, and looking at
0:08:28 > 0:08:33forcing them to accept increasing regulation. Some companies are ahead
0:08:33 > 0:08:39of us. Germany has strict rules, rules about finding tech companies
0:08:39 > 0:08:47if they do not handle abusive or hate speech adequately.I wonder why
0:08:47 > 0:08:51we have been behind other countries. We have been talking about the
0:08:51 > 0:08:54problems of lack of regulation and certainly lack of tax being paid for
0:08:54 > 0:09:02years.It is probably because our legal structure is permissive. If it
0:09:02 > 0:09:07is not strict forbidden you can do. Or so, for a long time, pervading
0:09:07 > 0:09:12ideology of the government party has been that basically freedom is great
0:09:12 > 0:09:17and, yeah, these are just wonderful entrepreneurs. Thing the tech firms
0:09:17 > 0:09:21have been able to do and Matt Hancock almost says this is become
0:09:21 > 0:09:25an entirely new type of company who does not need to follow any of the
0:09:25 > 0:09:33old rules. Are Facebook pretends it is not a publisher. Actually, as he
0:09:33 > 0:09:36says, that era of pretending that these are not normal companies that
0:09:36 > 0:09:40should follow normal rules is, I think, thankfully, coming to an end.
0:09:40 > 0:09:45Yes. They have really -- reached a certain level of maturity. Looking
0:09:45 > 0:09:53at city AM added every -- different story. Campaigners plead for a tax
0:09:53 > 0:10:01break as 18 pubs close every week. This is a campaign that always
0:10:01 > 0:10:05fights for tax breaks at pubs. Here they say that pubs are being hit by
0:10:05 > 0:10:11a triple whammy of high beer duty, business rates and VAT. This is
0:10:11 > 0:10:17where it is squeezing a lot of businesses, not just pubs. But they
0:10:17 > 0:10:21point out that 460 pubs closed in the second half of 2017. Does
0:10:21 > 0:10:27obviously sound like a high number, that is almost 18 a week. Most are
0:10:27 > 0:10:34in London however at the same time, they have to find ways to operate
0:10:34 > 0:10:37and some pubs are frightening in this environment.How much of it is
0:10:37 > 0:10:44down to our changing habits? People drinking at home more?Pubs have a
0:10:44 > 0:10:48long standing problem of people drinking less alcoholic drinks in
0:10:48 > 0:10:52general and drinking more of them at home. However, business rates are a
0:10:52 > 0:10:56big looming problem for the high street and a big looming problem for
0:10:56 > 0:11:00the government as well. The effect of them so far seems to have been
0:11:00 > 0:11:04much more severe than many people expected. ICD my own part of London,
0:11:04 > 0:11:08businesses that succeed in terms of bums on seats but do not succeed in
0:11:08 > 0:11:13terms of making enough money because of the raise in business rate. I
0:11:13 > 0:11:18think the lobby group has a point here and we are in danger of having
0:11:18 > 0:11:22an homogenous high-street.Business rates disproportionately hit certain
0:11:22 > 0:11:26places and London would be one of them.That is it for the papers
0:11:26 > 0:11:30tonight. You can see all the front pages of the papers online.
0:11:30 > 0:11:39Therefore you seven days a week@BBC.co.uk, don't fret, if you
0:11:39 > 0:11:45miss it you can watch it later on I play a. Thank you to both of you for
0:11:45 > 0:11:47sharing your Sunday night with a. Film review is