:00:14. > :00:16.Hello and welcome to The Record. The main headline:
:00:16. > :00:19.David Cameron has addressed the Northern Ireland Assembly at
:00:19. > :00:22.Stormont. He told Assembly Members the constitutional future of
:00:22. > :00:28.Northern Ireland did not rest with the Government but now rested with
:00:28. > :00:30.the people. Also on this programme: What are the lessons of the
:00:30. > :00:33.explosion at the nuclear plant in Japan?
:00:33. > :00:36.And MPs react to news that the Attorney General has found no
:00:36. > :00:46.evidence to support conspiracy theories about the death of the
:00:46. > :00:47.
:00:48. > :00:53.scientist Dr David Kelly. His statement today should put to
:00:53. > :00:57.bed some of the outrageous and fallacious speculations that
:00:57. > :01:00.members of our security forces might have murdered Dr Kelly.
:01:00. > :01:03.But first, David Cameron has become the second Prime Minister to
:01:03. > :01:06.address the Northern Ireland Assembly at Stormont since the
:01:06. > :01:09.signing of the Good Friday Agreement 13 years ago. He was
:01:09. > :01:12.driven to the Assembly building on the outskirts of Belfast shortly
:01:12. > :01:15.after 2.00pm, meeting officials as he arrived, before stepping inside
:01:15. > :01:18.the famous and historic building. A short walk through the building,
:01:18. > :01:26.and then Members of the Assembly got to their feet as the Prime
:01:26. > :01:35.Minister entered the chamber. David Cameron spoke first about some of
:01:35. > :01:39.the history of the building. Can I say what an honour it is to stand
:01:39. > :01:44.here and speak in this historic chamber? Of course, I recognise
:01:44. > :01:49.this is not a place without controversy. In the past it was for
:01:49. > :01:53.some a guarantee of their place within the Union. For others, a
:01:53. > :01:59.symbol of a state and a system from which they felt excluded. They do
:01:59. > :02:03.not intend to ignite that debate, but I am reminded of the words of
:02:03. > :02:08.King George V when he opened the Northern Ireland Parliament in 1921,
:02:08. > :02:13.and his appeal to all Irishmen and women to stretch their hand of
:02:13. > :02:17.forbearance and conciliation, to forgive and forget, and to join in
:02:17. > :02:22.making for the language they love a new era of peace, contentment and
:02:22. > :02:28.goodwill. -- the land which they love. He said it was time to start
:02:28. > :02:31.moving beyond the peace process. Given the history of Northern
:02:31. > :02:37.Ireland I do not underestimate the scale of the challenge. But it is a
:02:37. > :02:41.depressing fact that since the 2006 St Andrews agreement, the number of
:02:41. > :02:46.so-called Peace Walls has in -- increased from 37-48. It is
:02:46. > :02:49.disappointing that in too many places Protestant and Catholic
:02:49. > :02:54.communities remain segregated, sharing the same space but living
:02:54. > :02:58.their lives apart. According to one survey, the cost of division
:02:58. > :03:05.through the duplication of public services alone is around �1.5
:03:05. > :03:09.billion each year. But this is not just about the economic cost. It is
:03:09. > :03:12.about the social cost, too. It is these divisions that helped to
:03:12. > :03:17.sustain terrorism and other criminal activities, particularly
:03:17. > :03:22.within deprived communities. It was time to revive the private sector
:03:22. > :03:26.and attract investment. Northern Ireland is simply too dependent on
:03:26. > :03:31.the state for economic activity. According to one report, three-
:03:31. > :03:34.quarters of your GDP is accounted for by a state spending. At a time
:03:34. > :03:39.when we are dealing with the biggest budget deficit in our
:03:39. > :03:42.peacetime history, that is unsustainable and has to change. We
:03:42. > :03:46.recognise the difficulties facing Northern Ireland as you chart a new,
:03:47. > :03:51.more sustainable economic future requires us in Westminster to act
:03:51. > :03:54.responsibly. That is why we made sure that Northern Ireland did
:03:54. > :03:58.proportionately better than other parts of the UK in the Spending
:03:58. > :04:04.Review. By the end of this Parliament, the Northern Ireland
:04:04. > :04:08.resource budget will have gone down by 6.9%, 1.7% per year.
:04:08. > :04:12.concluded: let's work together to make
:04:12. > :04:16.devolution a success. Let us work together to revive the economy. Let
:04:17. > :04:21.us work together to build a shared future. And in working together, be
:04:21. > :04:25.assured that you have a Prime Minister, a secretary of state and
:04:25. > :04:35.a government that will always stand by the people here in Northern
:04:35. > :04:43.
:04:43. > :04:47.The Attorney General, Dominic Grieve, has rejected calls for an
:04:47. > :04:51.inquest into the death of the Government scientist Dr David Kelly.
:04:51. > :04:54.It was in the summer of 2003 that the body was discovered of the
:04:55. > :04:59.scientist who was at the centre of a row between the BBC and the
:04:59. > :05:04.Labour Government over the details of intelligence on Iraq. The Hutton
:05:04. > :05:07.Inquiry in 2004 found that Dr Kelly had committed suicide. But a group
:05:07. > :05:12.of doctors have mounted a long- running campaign for the inquest to
:05:12. > :05:15.be reopened, claiming the evidence did not point to suicide. Dominic
:05:15. > :05:25.Grieve spoke about the large amount of paperwork he'd received about Dr
:05:25. > :05:28.Kelly's death. Having given all the material that has been sent to me
:05:28. > :05:33.the most careful consideration, I have concluded that the evidence
:05:33. > :05:36.that Dr Kelly took his own life is overwhelmingly strong. Further,
:05:36. > :05:40.there is nothing I have seen that supports any allegation that Dr
:05:40. > :05:46.Kelly was murdered, or that his death was the subject of any kind
:05:46. > :05:50.of conspiracy or cover-up. In my view, no purpose would be served by
:05:50. > :05:55.my making an application to the High Court for an inquest. Indeed,
:05:55. > :06:00.I have no reasonable basis for doing so. There is no possibility
:06:00. > :06:03.that at an inquest a verdict other than suicide would be returned.
:06:03. > :06:10.turned to the theory that the body of Dr Keme had been moved at the
:06:10. > :06:16.area where it was found. -- Dr Kelly. If it had been moved, why,
:06:16. > :06:21.by whom and for what purpose? This issue has been fertile ground for
:06:21. > :06:24.imaginative speculation. In fact, all of the evidence provided by the
:06:24. > :06:28.careful forensic examination of the scene at the time, and a detailed
:06:28. > :06:33.review which exceptionally I have undertaken, supports the view that
:06:33. > :06:37.Dr Kelly died from -- died where he was found and from the causes
:06:37. > :06:41.determined. There is no evidence I have seen that would suggest any
:06:41. > :06:45.other explanation, or suggest any cover-up or conspiracy whatsoever.
:06:45. > :06:50.I wish to emphasise that my conclusions and decision are, as
:06:50. > :06:54.they must be, entirely my own, based on my assessment of the
:06:54. > :06:57.evidence. I have received no representations of any kind from
:06:57. > :07:01.the Prime Minister or any other ministerial colleague on this
:07:01. > :07:04.decision. The Attorney General's decision also substantiates the
:07:05. > :07:08.findings of a postmortem and toxicology reports conducted
:07:08. > :07:10.following Dr Kelly's death and published by the Ministry of
:07:10. > :07:14.Justice last October in the interest of maintaining public
:07:15. > :07:18.confidence in the inquiry into how Dr Kelly came by his death. The
:07:18. > :07:22.opposition, therefore, accepts the decision today, on the basis that
:07:22. > :07:26.he has very carefully and clearly outlined his detailed reasons for
:07:26. > :07:30.not applying to the High Court to request an inquest into Dr Kelly's
:07:30. > :07:35.death, due to the lack of new compelling evidence that Dr Kelly
:07:35. > :07:39.did not commit suicide. As a member of the foreign affairs committee
:07:39. > :07:43.that took evidence from David Kelly in 2003, I have never doubted that
:07:43. > :07:47.he committed suicide. I always believed Lord Hutton was right on
:07:47. > :07:50.this, even though his conclusions on the war have subsequently been
:07:50. > :07:55.challenged. I have known the Attorney General for many years and
:07:55. > :07:59.I know he will have done a thorough and diligent job. Will he accept
:07:59. > :08:05.that the evidence on this is clear and it is time to bring closure to
:08:05. > :08:07.this matter and move on? Will he know that when, along with
:08:07. > :08:11.intelligence and security colleagues, I questioned Dr Kelly
:08:11. > :08:15.two days before he died, I formed the view that a very distinguished
:08:15. > :08:20.public servant was deeply distressed by the situation in
:08:20. > :08:23.which he had placed himself. But although I am not persuaded by any
:08:23. > :08:28.of the theories that have been put forward as an alternative to
:08:28. > :08:34.suicide, could the Attorney what he thinks would be lost by allowing
:08:34. > :08:38.the process of inquiry to be completed by an inquest? Well, the
:08:38. > :08:42.first problem, have to say to my right honourable friend, is that
:08:42. > :08:46.there is no basis on which the High Court could possibly order an
:08:46. > :08:49.inquest. So in my judgment, if I were to go to the High Court and
:08:49. > :08:54.make such an advocate -- application, it would be dismissed,
:08:54. > :08:59.and dismissed, have to say, on the basis of my reasoning, with a
:08:59. > :09:05.certain amount of irritation. the Attorney General agree with me
:09:05. > :09:11.that his statement today should put to bed some of the out Regis and
:09:11. > :09:16.fallacious speculations -- outrageous and so fallacious
:09:16. > :09:20.speculations that members of our security forces might have murdered
:09:20. > :09:25.Dr Kelly? Can I welcome his statement. He will know that this
:09:25. > :09:28.will do nothing to discourage the paranoid conspiracy us so. On the
:09:28. > :09:35.other hand, even if an inquiry had gone ahead, they would not have
:09:35. > :09:42.changed their mind just because of the existence of evidence. Talking
:09:43. > :09:46.of paranoid conspiracy theorists, when the parliamentary secretary of
:09:46. > :09:54.state for transport told the media last year at the Hutton Inquiry had
:09:54. > :09:57.cut corners, was he speaking on behalf of the government?
:09:57. > :10:01.I am quite sure he was not speaking on behalf of the Government. In any
:10:01. > :10:05.case, the Government, as far as I'm concerned, does not have a position
:10:05. > :10:08.on this matter. I do, based on my review.
:10:08. > :10:11.The Business Secretary, Vince Cable, has again been criticised for
:10:11. > :10:14.failing to force banks to lend money to small businesses. Some
:10:14. > :10:18.months ago, Britain's four biggest banks agreed to increase lending in
:10:18. > :10:21.an arrangement known as Project Merlin, drawn up to deal with a
:10:21. > :10:24.shortage of loans following the recession. But new figures show the
:10:24. > :10:28.banks are already falling short of their lending targets by several
:10:28. > :10:36.billion pounds. Vince Cable faced MPs during questions to the
:10:36. > :10:42.Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. Figures published in
:10:42. > :10:46.May by the Bank of England show the UK's five largest banks lent �16.8
:10:46. > :10:50.billion to UK small businesses in the first quarter, failing to meet
:10:50. > :10:54.the targets. It is obviously disappointing and we will monitor
:10:54. > :11:00.lending closely over the year. We reserve the right to revisit the
:11:00. > :11:03.agreement if banks can such -- continue to miss the target. Many
:11:03. > :11:09.small businesses in my constituency complain that when they ask the
:11:09. > :11:12.banks for funding, they are told not to bother applying because they
:11:12. > :11:16.will only draw interest to their existing facilities and may have
:11:16. > :11:20.those withdrawn. What can the Government do to stop banks doing
:11:20. > :11:24.this? And then claiming they cannot meet their targets because of a
:11:24. > :11:28.lack of applications? There is a genuinely difficult problem of
:11:28. > :11:33.trying to get previously highly over-extended banks to lend to
:11:33. > :11:36.small and medium-sized businesses. The Secretary of State was very
:11:36. > :11:41.critical of the last Government's performance on this issue, saying
:11:41. > :11:46.the banks ran rings round that Government. But given that the
:11:46. > :11:48.first indications of project Merlin show a �2.2 billion shortfall
:11:48. > :11:53.between what the banks are doing and what the Government agreed they
:11:53. > :11:59.would do, how would he describe the performance of his Government on
:12:00. > :12:03.bank lending? Of the leading banks, two of them have met the targets,
:12:03. > :12:07.which demonstrated that the demand is there for the banks that are
:12:08. > :12:10.able and willing to change their culture of lending. Of course,
:12:10. > :12:14.where we have taken on the arrangements which the last
:12:14. > :12:18.Government had was bringing in the private banks, which are not owned
:12:18. > :12:21.wholly or partly by the taxpayer, in to this agreement. They are
:12:21. > :12:26.undoubtedly taking it seriously and we are making clear that we expect
:12:26. > :12:31.this agreement to be delivered, and that the volume of lending to small
:12:31. > :12:34.and medium enterprises will increase. Will he reassure us that
:12:34. > :12:37.he is ready to do more than just monitor the situation? In
:12:37. > :12:41.particular, not allowing banks to get away with the excuse that the
:12:41. > :12:44.demand is not there, when it is the price of the loan and the terms
:12:44. > :12:51.attached that so often is too difficult for struggling small
:12:51. > :12:55.businesses who need the credit? must realise the Merlin agreement
:12:55. > :13:01.is a busted flush. There is no good coming from it. The continued
:13:01. > :13:05.failure of the banking sector to meet the minimum targets set,
:13:05. > :13:08.meaning no new lending, is really not acceptable. The terms and
:13:08. > :13:12.conditions, as his own right honourable member has said, under
:13:12. > :13:16.which those loans that are made are made are really very penal, very
:13:16. > :13:19.often. Can he not get into that? There is no point monitoring, we
:13:19. > :13:25.want him to examine what is going on and come forward with concrete
:13:25. > :13:29.proposals to improve it. The Forum of Private Business are calling for
:13:30. > :13:35.a return to the traditional bank manager model. Some banks are now
:13:35. > :13:39.doing that. What can we do to encourage banks to give small
:13:39. > :13:43.business the individual attention and increase the autonomy of bank
:13:43. > :13:53.managers to make decisions and get rid of this culture of computer
:13:53. > :13:55.
:13:55. > :14:05.What we are dealing with here is a long-term issue about how you
:14:05. > :14:06.
:14:06. > :14:12.change the culture of the banks. Some of them, or one in particular,
:14:12. > :14:19.has been changing its relationship in terms of management. There are
:14:19. > :14:27.new banks entering the market and competition will help solve this
:14:27. > :14:32.problem. A Secretary of State or surf mentioned that pay for chief
:14:32. > :14:41.executive officers. How would this be delivered? Banks of failing to
:14:41. > :14:48.meet their obligations. In relation to the wider question of meeting
:14:48. > :14:54.lending objectives, we were assured when the agreement was signed that
:14:54. > :14:57.the incentives of senior executives would mean their remuneration board
:14:57. > :15:05.be greater than the share of small lending on their balance sheets. We
:15:05. > :15:10.are now trying to establish exactly what that means for individuals.
:15:10. > :15:17.Cabinet minister as hit back at the Archbishop of Canterbury over his
:15:17. > :15:21.attack on the coalition's policies. Sir George Young said the
:15:21. > :15:27.archbishop should praise the government on overseas aid and
:15:27. > :15:29.funding for poorer school children. The archbishop accused the
:15:29. > :15:36.coalition of rushing through radical policies that have not been
:15:36. > :15:39.voted on. In February the Prime Minister proclaimed we will soon
:15:39. > :15:43.publish a white paper setting out aware approach to public service
:15:43. > :15:51.reform that will signal the decisive end of the old-fashioned
:15:51. > :15:57.top-down model. Bold words. What has happened? Nothing. First it was
:15:57. > :16:02.put off until May and now it has been delayed until July because of
:16:02. > :16:06.another coalition split. One Lib Dems said that Nick Clegg does not
:16:06. > :16:14.want there to be any sense that the public sector cannot provide good
:16:14. > :16:19.public services. And finally, Baroness Thatcher famously possess
:16:19. > :16:29.no reverse gear, but this Prime Minister has a car stuffed full of
:16:29. > :16:29.
:16:29. > :16:32.them. It does make us wonder what exactly goes on inside Number 10
:16:32. > :16:38.when the Prime Minister approves of all these promises in the first
:16:38. > :16:42.place, only to reverse in the opposite direction when his
:16:42. > :16:47.pollsters tell him just how unpopular they are. After another
:16:47. > :16:54.week of chaos on this coalition, is it any wonder that the Archbishop
:16:54. > :16:58.of Canterbury is now on his knees in despair? On the question of the
:16:58. > :17:03.Archbishop, I have not seen the full text of what he has said, but
:17:03. > :17:07.I hope he has found time to balance any criticism of the Coalition for
:17:07. > :17:13.accommodation for some of the things we have done. For example,
:17:14. > :17:19.the commitment on overseas aid, making sure the poorest people in
:17:19. > :17:22.the world do not bear the burden of solving our problems. I hope he
:17:23. > :17:32.also finds time to commend aware action on more resources for the
:17:33. > :17:33.
:17:33. > :17:42.NHS, taking lower income people out of poverty. The archbishop said
:17:42. > :17:47.that we were rushing things through, which is not the case. The UK's
:17:47. > :17:54.nuclear industry has lessons to learn from the Fukushima nuclear
:17:54. > :18:02.disaster, according to the chief nuclear officer. The power station
:18:03. > :18:11.was hit after the devastating Japanese tsunami. Radiation levels
:18:11. > :18:15.have now risen considerably near the plant. The Inspector Mike
:18:15. > :18:20.Weightman said the UK's industry needed to be better prepared for
:18:20. > :18:30.extreme weather events. He said the failure of back-up electrical
:18:30. > :18:33.
:18:33. > :18:43.services in Japan had been a key factor. They lost all offside power.
:18:43. > :18:50.They lost their switch gear. Effectively, they left Auk on site
:18:50. > :18:55.power. -- they lost all onside power. When they do try to take
:18:55. > :19:03.readings, people were taking batteries out of cars to try and
:19:03. > :19:13.fix them up to instrumentation. There were also having to find ways
:19:13. > :19:16.
:19:16. > :19:26.of putting waters into -- water into the reactors. However, they
:19:26. > :19:30.
:19:30. > :19:34.did not have enough electricity for the pumps. He wanted all nuclear
:19:34. > :19:44.power stations prepared for the possibility of a lent the loss of
:19:44. > :19:56.
:19:56. > :20:01.power. Very simple means need to be put in place to keep things safe.
:20:01. > :20:09.Even if there is onside power, it needs to be in the by-play said
:20:09. > :20:19.that the pumps can work. One example is laying power cable by
:20:19. > :20:24.hand. A previous issue was that if they have been a pump that would
:20:24. > :20:27.put the water straight into the reactor, that would have helped.
:20:28. > :20:37.There are simple things you can think about for these long term
:20:38. > :20:42.
:20:43. > :20:50.loss of power issues. Also, after 9/11, work was done to figure out
:20:50. > :21:00.the best way to store equipment off site. If in theory there was a
:21:00. > :21:07.tsunami that hit Britain, would our work nuclear plants go the same way
:21:07. > :21:14.as Fukushima do? It would be difficult to say. What we have done
:21:14. > :21:21.in the UK is it appears we have a different approach to looking at
:21:21. > :21:31.external hazards. We do not just based it down on -- based it on
:21:31. > :21:31.
:21:31. > :21:41.what is the largest one we have seen? We look at the historical
:21:41. > :21:46.
:21:46. > :21:52.data and estimate the worst case scenario. Fortunately, we are not
:21:52. > :21:59.in a fault line, so aware seismic hazard is not as high. However, if
:21:59. > :22:06.we did have an earthquake, there would be mass destruction right
:22:06. > :22:11.across the infrastructure. Would you agree that it would be easier
:22:11. > :22:21.for you to do your job and draw up a report if there was a widespread
:22:21. > :22:25.
:22:25. > :22:30.understanding regarding the risks of the nuclear industry? I don't
:22:30. > :22:38.believe it would make it easier for me to draw up my report. My report
:22:38. > :22:44.is about saying, OK, this is our bases and we can learn from
:22:44. > :22:48.Fukushima. It is not about the acceptability of nuclear power, the
:22:48. > :22:58.tolerance of the nuclear power were industry in the UK. This is simply
:22:58. > :23:01.
:23:01. > :23:08.saying, here is an accident, it has caused so cycle impacts -- it has
:23:08. > :23:14.impacted on society. What can we learn about it so we can minimise
:23:14. > :23:24.anything similar happening in the UK? You are watching The Record.
:23:24. > :23:28.David Cameron address the assembly in at Stormont and said that the
:23:28. > :23:38.constitution of Northern Ireland rested with the people. At this
:23:38. > :23:43.
:23:43. > :23:47.point we say goodbye to our viewers on the BBC news channel.
:23:48. > :23:51.A former Deputy Prime Minister Lord Prescott has set the phone hacking
:23:51. > :24:01.scandal has shown there is something rotten in the state of
:24:01. > :24:03.
:24:03. > :24:09.England. In the Lords, he insisted on a public inquiry being held into
:24:09. > :24:19.the issue. And then you might talk about the Press Complaints
:24:19. > :24:23.
:24:23. > :24:30.Committee. A body to that is there to hold the media, particularly the
:24:30. > :24:36.press to account. Even the Press Complaints agency fell to
:24:36. > :24:41.investigate anything into phone hacking, something that I think it
:24:41. > :24:51.has an authority to do so. It is worse than that because the share
:24:51. > :24:52.
:24:52. > :24:58.was fined �20,000 for misleading statements. If that is the body
:24:58. > :25:02.that has some report, the police should investigate. We are right to
:25:03. > :25:09.say there is something rotten in the state of England at present and
:25:09. > :25:12.it is not an acceptable proposition. If you talk about how the media,
:25:12. > :25:21.you'd better start doing something about the people who are
:25:21. > :25:25.controlling it who are in content. Regarding the phone hacking that
:25:25. > :25:30.the noble Lord mentioned, the phone hacking allegations as I have said
:25:30. > :25:38.before our very serious, but they are matters of the criminal courts
:25:38. > :25:43.and not for this debate today. the unrest in the Arab world now.
:25:43. > :25:48.The government has urged British people to leave Yemen where
:25:49. > :25:58.hundreds of civilians have been killed. Royal Marines are standing
:25:59. > :25:59.
:25:59. > :26:06.by to help with any evacuation. situation in the Yemen has been
:26:06. > :26:10.very grave for a long time. I think that we all owe a debt of gratitude
:26:10. > :26:13.to those members of the Foreign Office who are still prepared to
:26:13. > :26:21.stay in the embassy in the circumstances, given that the
:26:21. > :26:24.embassy has come under attack on a number of occasions. But come the
:26:24. > :26:30.noble Lord assure us, I know this is difficult, but one we know that
:26:30. > :26:35.demand will be the targets of groups like Al-Qaeda, that in the
:26:35. > :26:39.eventual possible absence of British personnel on the ground, we
:26:39. > :26:46.will be able to monitor what is going on in Yemen properly and not
:26:46. > :26:54.rely solely on Yemen's neighbours to pass information to us? We need
:26:54. > :27:02.to get high quality information of the best kind. Out to be -- as to
:27:02. > :27:12.the Al-Qaeda involvement, there is concern that they are operating
:27:12. > :27:19.there. Getting accurate information is difficult. It is essential for
:27:19. > :27:24.the government to be even-handed and to which the local population
:27:24. > :27:33.well. Should that not include Israel? Has the government taken
:27:33. > :27:41.steps to ask Israeli troops not to shoot at unarmed civilians? This
:27:41. > :27:46.question is about Yemen. Unfortunately, every country has
:27:46. > :27:51.different situations that have to be handled differently. We have to
:27:51. > :27:56.appreciate, respect and understand the end the workings of these
:27:56. > :28:01.countries to be effective. Now, where have all the tickets gone?
:28:01. > :28:06.The prospect of sitting in these stadia at the 2012 Olympics does
:28:06. > :28:10.not seem likely for thousands of people after they found out their
:28:10. > :28:13.ticket applications were turned down. The Mayor of London Boris
:28:13. > :28:16.Johnson said he was cheesed off because he did not get his ticket
:28:16. > :28:21.request and there was another politician on the Labour benches
:28:21. > :28:25.that did not get what he wanted. Can we have a statement about the
:28:25. > :28:29.Olympic tickets debacle and in particular why is it they can
:28:29. > :28:34.devise a system by which a million people did not get anything at all
:28:34. > :28:38.in the first ballot and people have to do as I do and register on a
:28:38. > :28:43.French website to get a sensible way of trying to purchase tickets
:28:43. > :28:48.for the Olympics? Should the committee not be called in, showing
:28:48. > :28:51.them the instruments of torture and getting them to sort this out?
:28:51. > :28:59.There were more bitter for tickets and tickets were available, said
:28:59. > :29:07.they had to be a rational system. There will be an opportunity a week
:29:07. > :29:12.from today to talk about this and I will give ministers due warning
:29:12. > :29:16.that the honourable member is on the warpath. So look out for him.
:29:16. > :29:19.And that's it from this edition of the Record. But do join me for the
:29:19. > :29:22.Record Review when we not only look back at the week in Parliament, but