:00:12. > :00:14.Hello and welcome to Thursday in Parliament, our look at the best
:00:15. > :00:17.of the day in the Commons and the Lords.
:00:18. > :00:23.Labour keeps up its attack on the Chancellor's Budget.
:00:24. > :00:28.He kicked the poor and made them cry.
:00:29. > :00:33.Georgie delivered a tax giveaway.
:00:34. > :00:35.A review finds no evidence that establishment figures were involved
:00:36. > :00:41.in the historical abuse of children in care in North Wales.
:00:42. > :00:47.The victims were torn to shreds in a merciless way and several
:00:48. > :00:53.of them took their lives as a direct consequence of the abuse
:00:54. > :00:56.being continued by our court system, and it is still continuing today.
:00:57. > :00:59.Arguments over the European Union intensify in the Lords.
:01:00. > :01:06.If the single market is such an economic miracle,
:01:07. > :01:08.why does he think that the European Union is widely
:01:09. > :01:15.recognised as being something close to an economic disaster zone?
:01:16. > :01:18.As the debate on the Budget resumed in the Commons,
:01:19. > :01:21.Labour claimed the reductions announced for disability benefits
:01:22. > :01:24.represented a "new low" for the Government.
:01:25. > :01:26.The Chancellor George Osborne is facing calls from opposition
:01:27. > :01:30.parties, and some Tory backbenchers, to reverse a planned ?1.3 billion
:01:31. > :01:36.cut to payments that help people with day-to-day living such
:01:37. > :01:46.The Shadow Chancellor made an appeal to MPs.
:01:47. > :01:48.Can I just say this across the house?
:01:49. > :01:51.This is a very important issue, we will not make party
:01:52. > :02:00.I say this sincerely, as someone who has campaigned
:02:01. > :02:02.on disability issues in this house for
:02:03. > :02:06.I urge you, and all members now, to press the Chancellor
:02:07. > :02:09.It is cruel, and it is unfortunately, I believe,
:02:10. > :02:15.dangerous for the well-being of disabled people.
:02:16. > :02:17.Does he not agree with me that if the
:02:18. > :02:20.Chancellor does not listen to us on this side about these Draconian
:02:21. > :02:22.cuts to people who are receiving such
:02:23. > :02:24.benefits, perhaps he will listen to Graham Ellis, the chair
:02:25. > :02:26.of the Conservative disability group, who
:02:27. > :02:29.is now, as a result of these pernicious cuts, cutting all links
:02:30. > :02:35.In the six years that he's been in charge
:02:36. > :02:38.of the nation's finances, the Chancellor has missed every
:02:39. > :02:44.He said he would balance the books by 2015,
:02:45. > :02:49.but a deficit this year is set to be over ?72 billion.
:02:50. > :02:53.That Britain would pay its way around the world before it has
:02:54. > :03:02.overseen the biggest current-account deficit since modern records began.
:03:03. > :03:05.You know, I want to help the Labour Party in every way that
:03:06. > :03:15.And I want them to be credible in the next selection.
:03:16. > :03:17.But the Shadow Chancellor took to the airwaves this morning
:03:18. > :03:18.and talked about borrowing more money.
:03:19. > :03:20.Can he give an absolute commitment that if
:03:21. > :03:23.he was to become Chancellor, he would not borrow more money
:03:24. > :03:28.The present Chancellor has just borrowed...
:03:29. > :03:35.?200 billion extra than what he promised.
:03:36. > :03:41.Let us make it absolutely clear that like any company...
:03:42. > :03:45.Like any company, UK PLC under us - we will invest.
:03:46. > :03:49.We will invest in the plant and machinery to create the growth
:03:50. > :03:55.which can afford our public services.
:03:56. > :03:58.The Shadow Chancellor proved today that
:03:59. > :04:01.he is incapable of answering any of the questions put to him
:04:02. > :04:08.But he is able to tell us a few things.
:04:09. > :04:10.He's told us he wants to transform capitalism.
:04:11. > :04:12.He's told us that his heroes are Lenin and Trotsky.
:04:13. > :04:15.He's told us that he wants to borrow more.
:04:16. > :04:18.In fact, had we carried on with the Labour Party's plans
:04:19. > :04:21.when they were in government, from 2010,
:04:22. > :04:24.we would have borrowed ?930 billion more in the course of the last six
:04:25. > :04:35.The Education Secretary brought the focus of the debate round to
:04:36. > :04:39.schools. For those who are
:04:40. > :04:41.saying that we aren't addressing the critical issues,
:04:42. > :04:43.they could not be further Our white paper published today
:04:44. > :04:47.is a vision for raising standards in teaching,
:04:48. > :04:48.and raise them higher than any
:04:49. > :04:49.government has before. Teachers will be better
:04:50. > :04:51.qualified and accredited, they will have access to the best
:04:52. > :04:54.opportunities and command more respect than any generation
:04:55. > :04:56.of teachers before them. Taking their rightful place among
:04:57. > :04:58.the great professions. Let me thank the Secretary of State
:04:59. > :05:02.very much for giving way. Didn't we go through years and years
:05:03. > :05:05.under Labour where our standards We did our children
:05:06. > :05:08.absolutely no favours, While most of us would agree
:05:09. > :05:20.that the extension of the school day is most welcome,
:05:21. > :05:21.there will be children And therefore finding
:05:22. > :05:24.it most difficult to benefit from any of the reforms
:05:25. > :05:28.that any of us may talk about. While one welcomes
:05:29. > :05:30.the Chancellor's sugar tax, which will give more children
:05:31. > :05:35.the abilities to start their school with food in their bellies,
:05:36. > :05:38.might she break convention and lead a cross-party group to her colleague
:05:39. > :05:41.sitting next to her so that we can lobby for some of that sugar tax
:05:42. > :05:44.to feed the poorest children I thank the honourable
:05:45. > :05:53.gentleman very much indeed, my right honourable friend
:05:54. > :05:56.or I would be very happy to meet One of the announcements that has
:05:57. > :06:00.not got the attention from yesterday, but I will come
:06:01. > :06:03.onto it, is the funding, additional funding, significant
:06:04. > :06:04.additional funding for breakfast We have, as a government,
:06:05. > :06:08.also committed to continuing the pupil premium,
:06:09. > :06:09.another way in which schools are able to use that money
:06:10. > :06:12.to support those children In answer to my honourable
:06:13. > :06:18.friend for Sheffield Healy showed that 100%
:06:19. > :06:20.of the Treasury senior civil servants are based in Whitehall,
:06:21. > :06:22.with 60% of the civil servants being men, apparently the Chancellor
:06:23. > :06:25.really does think that the man He has a lot of men in Whitehall
:06:26. > :06:34.making the decisions in this budget. Is that why they have
:06:35. > :06:36.failed to come up with Let me say to the
:06:37. > :06:41.honourable lady I had the pleasure of working
:06:42. > :06:43.in the Treasury with my honourable friend the Chancellor
:06:44. > :06:49.in the last parliament. You could not find somebody more
:06:50. > :06:51.supportive of promoting women Let's deal with the issue
:06:52. > :06:57.of the tampon tax. We hope very much that
:06:58. > :07:00.we are going to make progress with the EU
:07:01. > :07:05.in relation to the VAT rate. I think when we try to give people
:07:06. > :07:09.educations, we also do it in a way that is easier to digest
:07:10. > :07:11.and remember when people leave. I tend to think if I cannot explain
:07:12. > :07:14.it to my seven-year-old son, I think that is the way I will pitch
:07:15. > :07:23.it to my friends across the house Because, it is no more
:07:24. > :07:35.complicated than this: Georgie Porgie spun a lie, he kicked
:07:36. > :07:38.the poor and made them cry. And when the rich came out to play,
:07:39. > :07:41.Georgie delivered a tax giveaway. It's really no more
:07:42. > :07:43.complicated than that. Taking money from the poorest,
:07:44. > :07:45.giving it to the richest. I must also stress, moving on,
:07:46. > :07:48.my support for the sugar tax It is also bold, I believe,
:07:49. > :07:56.a move that sends a message that will educate and encourage,
:07:57. > :07:58.with consumers and parents, and children, and
:07:59. > :07:59.the drinks industry. Given the two tiers,
:08:00. > :08:02.it will also encourage the drinks industry to cut down
:08:03. > :08:04.on the amount of sugar in drinks, My own grandmother died
:08:05. > :08:08.when my father was very She had a complete and
:08:09. > :08:11.utter addiction to soft Now, although that was a different
:08:12. > :08:15.era, and we cannot be 100% it was the cause
:08:16. > :08:17.of her diabetes, it is My family grew up in
:08:18. > :08:25.a household that was very I often think if we had
:08:26. > :08:29.that tax then, what Child sexual abuse was endemic
:08:30. > :08:34.at residential homes in North Wales That was the conclusion
:08:35. > :08:37.of a shocking report, published in 2000,
:08:38. > :08:39.by Sir Ronald Waterhouse. That report didn't discover
:08:40. > :08:40.whether prominent individuals, But in 2012, when allegations
:08:41. > :08:50.about public figures were coming to light, the Government ordered
:08:51. > :08:56.a review into the adequacy It was led by Lady Justice Macur,
:08:57. > :09:03.who has now published her findings. She endorsed the first inquiry
:09:04. > :09:05.and said she had found no evidence of involvement by
:09:06. > :09:16.Establishment figures. Let's be clear, we are talking
:09:17. > :09:19.about dark and shameful events that These were children
:09:20. > :09:27.in the care of the state because they were vulnerable
:09:28. > :09:29.and the state let them down. That is why our first thought
:09:30. > :09:32.will always be with the victims, supporting them and bringing
:09:33. > :09:34.the perpetrators to justice. Waterhouse's final report,
:09:35. > :09:36.Lost In Care, published in 2000, concluded that widespread sexual
:09:37. > :09:39.abuse of boys occurred in children's residential establishments
:09:40. > :09:44.in Clwyd in 1974 and 1990, and that there was a paedophile ring
:09:45. > :09:51.operating in the North Wales and Chester areas, but no reference
:09:52. > :09:54.was made to any abuse being carried out by nationally
:09:55. > :09:58.prominent individuals. Stephen Crabb said Lady Justice
:09:59. > :10:00.Macur examined a huge Lady Justice Macur's
:10:01. > :10:06.main finding is that, and I quote, "I have found no reason
:10:07. > :10:08.to undermine the conclusions of Waterhouse in respect of
:10:09. > :10:13.the nature and the scale of abuse." Lady Justice Macur looked closely
:10:14. > :10:15.at the issue of nationally prominent figures and concluded
:10:16. > :10:18.that there was, again I quote, "No evidence of the involvement
:10:19. > :10:20.of nationally prominent individuals in the abuse of children
:10:21. > :10:22.in care in North Wales Some named in the report
:10:23. > :10:34.have been removed. Lady Justice Macur urged caution
:10:35. > :10:39.in relation to releasing names of individuals accused of abuse
:10:40. > :10:42.or speculated to be involved in abuse who have not been subject
:10:43. > :10:46.to a police investigation, have not been convicted
:10:47. > :10:50.of a criminal offence and/or whose name is not in the public domain
:10:51. > :10:54.in the context of child abuse, whether establishment
:10:55. > :10:55.figures or not. She argued that to do so would be,
:10:56. > :10:59.and I quote, "Unfair in two respects The extent of the abuse
:11:00. > :11:06.revealed by the Waterhouse It found evidence of widespread
:11:07. > :11:11.and persistent physical and sexual abuse, including multiple rapes
:11:12. > :11:15.carried out against young This abuse was allowed to take
:11:16. > :11:21.place over many years, sometimes decades, in the very homes
:11:22. > :11:24.where vulnerable children should The scale of the abuse is shocking
:11:25. > :11:32.but what is also shocking is that many of the enquiries into this
:11:33. > :11:34.abuse have encountered a reluctance to cooperate with them and a refusal
:11:35. > :11:37.to publish their conclusions. In short, cover-ups
:11:38. > :11:45.and missed opportunities. She welcomed the publication
:11:46. > :11:48.of the Macur review. There may be cases where reductions
:11:49. > :11:51.are needed, not least to ensure that no ongoing police investigation
:11:52. > :11:54.is compromised, but these reductions must be as few as possible and they
:11:55. > :12:03.must be justified to survivors. One MP was concerned
:12:04. > :12:05.about the removal of names I feel that this will be a matter
:12:06. > :12:11.that will cause the most concern I fully understand the reasons my
:12:12. > :12:15.right honourable friend has given, which were made by Lady Justice
:12:16. > :12:17.Macur, but can he confirm, can he confirm that
:12:18. > :12:27.Justice Lowell Goddard will have the right to pursue
:12:28. > :12:31.in her own inquiry the names of those whose names have been
:12:32. > :12:34.redacted, the identities of those whose names have been redacted
:12:35. > :12:40.in the report that he has given? A full un-redacted copy has gone
:12:41. > :12:43.to the Goddard inquiry. He asks whether Goddard will be able
:12:44. > :12:46.to pursue those names Just bear in mind that one
:12:47. > :12:56.of the specific recommendations of this Macur review today is that
:12:57. > :12:59.actually it's the police and the judicial process
:13:00. > :13:01.that is best placed to go after, in his words, names of people
:13:02. > :13:04.who might be... where there are specific
:13:05. > :13:06.allegations, and public or private enquiries aren't the best forum
:13:07. > :13:10.for doing that. Page 300 of the Waterhouse report
:13:11. > :13:14.lists the names of 13 young men who couldn't give evidence
:13:15. > :13:18.to the new report because they Most of them took their lives
:13:19. > :13:24.following the case where they went before those who were accused,
:13:25. > :13:30.who were all used to giving evidence in court, some of them
:13:31. > :13:35.because of their police background. The victims were torn to shreds
:13:36. > :13:39.in a merciless way and several of them took their lives as a direct
:13:40. > :13:42.consequence of the abuse being continued by our court system,
:13:43. > :13:51.and it's still continuing today. The Welsh Secretary said heinous,
:13:52. > :13:54.horrific acts of abuse took place, and he recognised that the report
:13:55. > :14:00.would not bring closure to everyone. With 97 days to go in the EU
:14:01. > :14:04.referendum campaign, Euro-sceptic peers have been
:14:05. > :14:06.stepping up their arguments over why a British exit, or
:14:07. > :14:11.Brexit, makes sense. The veteran Ukip peer Lord Pearson
:14:12. > :14:14.raised in the Lords a recent document from the Civitas
:14:15. > :14:19.think-tank entitled "How The Trade Benefits Of EU
:14:20. > :14:22.Membership Have Been Mis-sold". He said he was disappointed
:14:23. > :14:24.at the way the Government had Which shows that four
:14:25. > :14:33.smaller non-EU countries, Chile, Korea, Singapore
:14:34. > :14:35.and Switzerland, have been able to make vastly more free trade deals
:14:36. > :14:39.than has the EU with its pretended My Lords, can the Government tell us
:14:40. > :14:46.why, as the world's fifth-largest economy, we couldn't do as well
:14:47. > :14:51.or better if we left the EU? And second, does the Government
:14:52. > :14:54.accept that the single market would want to continue
:14:55. > :14:57.its free trade with us He must recognise the fact that
:14:58. > :15:05.while half the goods we exported went to the EU, when you look at it
:15:06. > :15:09.from the EU's point of view, 7% of EU goods came to the UK,
:15:10. > :15:15.so I hardly think that's a strong negotiating stance to get all 27
:15:16. > :15:17.countries to agree unanimously Would my noble friend
:15:18. > :15:26.the Minister please...? My noble friend the Minister
:15:27. > :15:37.referred to reform of And indeed the European Union has
:15:38. > :15:45.proved itself to be unreformable. If the single market was such
:15:46. > :15:48.an economic miracle, why does he think that
:15:49. > :15:54.the European Union is widely recognised as being something close
:15:55. > :15:56.to an economic disaster zone Why does he think that in the latest
:15:57. > :16:03.opinion poll in France, published in Le Monde a few days
:16:04. > :16:09.ago, 53% of the French people said they would like a referendum
:16:10. > :16:12.so they could leave My Lords, when he says
:16:13. > :16:23.that the EU isn't reformed, he ignores the fact we are out
:16:24. > :16:26.of the parts of Europe which don't work for us, so we won't have
:16:27. > :16:30.to join the euro, that is agreed, we won't have to be part
:16:31. > :16:33.of Eurozone bailouts, that is agreed, we won't be
:16:34. > :16:36.part of a European army, that is agreed, and importantly we
:16:37. > :16:43.won't be part of an EU superstate. So we have the best of both worlds
:16:44. > :16:47.and the one thing we do have is a market of 500 million people
:16:48. > :16:50.on our doorstep without any trade We were told earlier
:16:51. > :16:57.that it was a remarkable, ground-breaking document but,
:16:58. > :17:01.my Lords, even the author of the Civitas paper says,
:17:02. > :17:05.and I quote, "Nonmember countries pay nothing for exporting
:17:06. > :17:08.to the single market other than the tariffs and trade costs
:17:09. > :17:14.of individual exporters." Would the Minister not agree,
:17:15. > :17:18.that is the very reason that the UK needs to be in the single market,
:17:19. > :17:22.precisely so that our individual exporters are not subject
:17:23. > :17:27.to the tariffs that members of third The noble Lord spoke of lower prices
:17:28. > :17:36.in the single market but since this organisation is a protectionist
:17:37. > :17:38.organisation, isn't it clearly the case that consumers
:17:39. > :17:40.within the EU are paying higher prices than they would
:17:41. > :17:44.otherwise be paying? Can I just give the example
:17:45. > :17:47.of flights, which have come down A former Cabinet Minister asked
:17:48. > :17:51.about a recent pro-EU letter My Lords, as we are on the subject,
:17:52. > :17:58.could my noble friend clear up Were those letters which were
:17:59. > :18:06.published over the names of distinguished former military
:18:07. > :18:17.personnel and leading industrialists drafted by people who were being
:18:18. > :18:20.paid by Her Majesty's government who subsequently importuned those
:18:21. > :18:22.gentlemen for their signatures, My Lords, my briefing
:18:23. > :18:27.didn't cover that, But what I can do is commend
:18:28. > :18:40.to the House the speech in the debate on the 2nd of March
:18:41. > :18:44.from the noble Lord Stirrup, who gave a very clear speech on why
:18:45. > :18:49.it was preferable to remain You're watching our round-up
:18:50. > :18:56.of the day in the Commons Still to come: have coffee cups
:18:57. > :19:05.become an environmental hazard? MPs have called for a proper
:19:06. > :19:08.investigation into the potential health threats from contaminated air
:19:09. > :19:12.on passenger planes. Concerns have been raised
:19:13. > :19:15.in particular about so-called aerotoxic syndrome, the name given
:19:16. > :19:17.to illnesses caused by exposure A debate in Westminster Hall was led
:19:18. > :19:24.by Labour's Jonathan Reynolds, The key factor here is the use
:19:25. > :19:31.of bleed air to provide a pressurised air supply
:19:32. > :19:34.in the cabin during flights. It is compressed air from the jet
:19:35. > :19:37.engines and is used by the vast majority of passenger
:19:38. > :19:40.aircraft in operation today. The problem arises when faults
:19:41. > :19:43.with engine seals cause seepage into the cockpit and cabin,
:19:44. > :19:47.which in turn can lead to contaminated fumes containing
:19:48. > :19:49.toxins being digested by people Aerotoxic syndrome is something
:19:50. > :19:55.which affects the peripheral central Symptoms include migraines, fatigue,
:19:56. > :20:01.difficulty thinking, numbness, aches and pains, breathing
:20:02. > :20:06.problems and digestive problems. Furthermore, there has been
:20:07. > :20:08.a significant rise in the number of cases, which simply
:20:09. > :20:12.cannot be ignored. I think it is very significant
:20:13. > :20:15.that the Unite trade union have been able to tell me they are
:20:16. > :20:17.currently acting on behalf There is evidence here pointing
:20:18. > :20:23.to this being an illness cabin crew may be exposed to, not
:20:24. > :20:26.to mention passengers also, and I think that must
:20:27. > :20:28.be treated seriously. It seems to me, in the research
:20:29. > :20:32.I have done on this issue, it is highly likely that aerotoxic
:20:33. > :20:38.syndrome is a real result, a health outcome of prolonged
:20:39. > :20:45.exposure to toxic air and therefore this issue deserves the attention
:20:46. > :20:50.of Parliament and deserves the attention of the
:20:51. > :20:56.Department for Transport. Does the honourable member agree
:20:57. > :20:58.with me that some of the symptoms could be confused with other
:20:59. > :21:00.illnesses and therefore Worryingly, for short exposures
:21:01. > :21:07.effects are usually reversible, but for cabin crew who may be
:21:08. > :21:11.exposed on a more regular basis, permanent neurological
:21:12. > :21:13.damage could occur and, Yes, I think that is indeed
:21:14. > :21:25.a distinct possibility. The industry, including regulators,
:21:26. > :21:28.are relying on a system of denial rather than fitting detection
:21:29. > :21:33.systems required to collect the evidence on the true number
:21:34. > :21:37.and concentration of fume events. I don't believe the industry,
:21:38. > :21:41.or the Government for that matter, would deny the existence of fume
:21:42. > :21:44.events, and again the Minister can correct me if I'm wrong
:21:45. > :21:47.but I believe they would also accept fume events are detrimental
:21:48. > :21:51.to health and, while possibly disagreeing on the extent
:21:52. > :21:54.of the impact, I would like to ask the Minister to support calls
:21:55. > :21:58.for an independent inquiry. This issue is taken seriously
:21:59. > :22:03.by all parties involved but also it is a complex issue with little
:22:04. > :22:05.evidence to show that change is needed, but it will take time
:22:06. > :22:09.to find new and innovative solutions We certainly need to coordinate
:22:10. > :22:14.international research and I will certainly raise this
:22:15. > :22:17.with the CAA at my next I'll also discuss it with Balpa
:22:18. > :22:20.when I meet with them. Although I have to say this has not
:22:21. > :22:23.necessarily been very high on their agenda at some
:22:24. > :22:26.of the meetings I have heard, but maybe debates like this
:22:27. > :22:28.will further raise awareness amongst Last year's introduction of a 5p
:22:29. > :22:37.charge on shopping bags in England and Wales, in the interests
:22:38. > :22:42.of tidying up the environment, has been a success, in the view
:22:43. > :22:45.of the Environment Minister, Fewer bags are
:22:46. > :22:47.cluttering the streets. Because they're a combination
:22:48. > :22:52.of plastic and paper, they can't be recycled,
:22:53. > :22:57.and too many are being discarded. A Labour MP believes
:22:58. > :23:02.it's time for action. Could the Government have a look
:23:03. > :23:05.at the problem with the wretched number of plastic lined paper
:23:06. > :23:07.takeaway coffee cups? The overwhelming majority
:23:08. > :23:10.of which never get recycled because of the difficulties
:23:11. > :23:14.of ripping out the plastic lining It is a huge problem
:23:15. > :23:23.and there are tens of millions of these things being produced
:23:24. > :23:26.and thrown away and, as the honourable member pointed
:23:27. > :23:29.out, many of these things cannot be recycled either by the way
:23:30. > :23:33.they are disposed of or because of Having tackled plastic bags,
:23:34. > :23:37.which I hope everybody in the House would agree the plastic bag
:23:38. > :23:39.tax has been a success, coffee cups seems to be a very good
:23:40. > :23:42.thing to look at next. Another Labour MP thought credit
:23:43. > :23:47.for recycling lay with Europe. Would he not accept that if it
:23:48. > :23:51.hadn't been for the European Union we would be nowhere in terms
:23:52. > :23:55.of dealing with the waste, we would still be throwing
:23:56. > :24:02.all our waste in holes in the ground in this country if it hadn't
:24:03. > :24:05.been for the stimulation The honourable member tempts me
:24:06. > :24:10.into a much bigger political conversation, but it is true that EU
:24:11. > :24:15.has played a constructive role in this, has shown real leadership
:24:16. > :24:18.on recycling and there are certainly things we can learn from other
:24:19. > :24:20.European countries, particularly Denmark on the success
:24:21. > :24:23.they have had on landfill. I was litter picking over
:24:24. > :24:30.the Clean For The Queen weekend, outside a local primary school,
:24:31. > :24:33.and I was dismayed to find that most What could the Government do
:24:34. > :24:39.to encourage the next generation to recycle more and not miss
:24:40. > :24:42.the opportunity to forge If half her colleagues
:24:43. > :24:48.are as virtuous as the right honourable lady, she's set a very
:24:49. > :24:50.high and exacting standard. Mr Speaker, if I could join
:24:51. > :24:55.with you in paying tribute to the virtue of the
:24:56. > :24:59.right honourable lady. The answer is, of course,
:25:00. > :25:02.that we need to work on educating people, and this is a German model,
:25:03. > :25:06.right the way from school upwards on the importance of protecting
:25:07. > :25:08.resources and recycling, but I believe we could also do more
:25:09. > :25:12.to harmonise the system so it's more straightforward wherever you live
:25:13. > :25:16.in the country to know exactly what needs to be recycled
:25:17. > :25:21.and where to put your recycling. Do join me for the Week
:25:22. > :25:25.In Parliament, when we not only look back over the last few days
:25:26. > :25:28.at Westminster but also try to assess whether we're entering
:25:29. > :25:33.a new era of personality politics. Until then, from me,
:25:34. > :25:38.Keith Macdougall, goodbye.