:00:12. > :00:15.Hello there and welcome to Tuesday in Parliament.
:00:16. > :00:17.Coming up: The schools minister orders an investigation
:00:18. > :00:23.after the second leak of tests for primary school children.
:00:24. > :00:26.The government's urged to act quickly on its pledge to take child
:00:27. > :00:31.And the Home Secretary tells MPs why she thinks the UK
:00:32. > :00:43.As Home Secretary, from everything I have seen, in my experience, we are
:00:44. > :00:46.safer and more secure inside the European Union than outside.
:00:47. > :00:49.But first: Ministers have launched a hunt for a "rogue marker"
:00:50. > :00:51.who leaked a SATs test to a journalist.
:00:52. > :00:53.MPs were told that Key Stage Two English spelling and grammar test
:00:54. > :00:55.had been "mistakenly uploaded" onto a secure website.
:00:56. > :00:58.And an individual with access to the site then leaked the test
:00:59. > :01:02.The spelling, punctuation and grammar test was taken by
:01:03. > :01:05.600,000 children in their final year of state primary school
:01:06. > :01:12.It's the second time in three weeks a primary school exam has been
:01:13. > :01:18.The government was forced to scrap a test for half a million children
:01:19. > :01:21.aged six and seven after it emerged that it had been posted
:01:22. > :01:24.with practice materials three months early.
:01:25. > :01:31.Nick Gibb came to the Commons to reassure MPs.
:01:32. > :01:37.We have no evidence to suggest that any sensitive information entered
:01:38. > :01:43.the public domain before children started taking the test today. And
:01:44. > :01:47.the tests are going ahead as planned. My officials were
:01:48. > :01:51.monitoring social media and other platforms through the night and
:01:52. > :01:58.found no sign of materials being made available. He said he would ask
:01:59. > :02:04.the boss of person, who employ the markers, to investigate two issues.
:02:05. > :02:13.First, how did that come to be uploaded? It's clearly a mistake
:02:14. > :02:17.which not have been possible. Secondly, I ask that all information
:02:18. > :02:18.is interrogated so that the culprit who leaked this sensitive
:02:19. > :02:20.information be identified. Just three weeks ago,
:02:21. > :02:22.it was discovered that another of the tests had been published
:02:23. > :02:25.in advance as a practice paper on the Department's own website -
:02:26. > :02:38.and had to be withdrawn. To adapt Oscar Wilde, to lose one
:02:39. > :02:43.test may be regarded as a mistake, but to lose both looks like
:02:44. > :02:49.carelessness. You really could not make it up. This is a serious breach
:02:50. > :02:54.on top of a series of multiple failures. How on earth can parents
:02:55. > :02:58.have confidence in the assessment regime when the Department for
:02:59. > :03:05.Education has come lately lost control of the tests it is
:03:06. > :03:10.responsible for? It seems to me, having listened to the Minister and
:03:11. > :03:13.the statement about the U-turn on academies recently, that the
:03:14. > :03:19.Department for Education should be put in special measures. What
:03:20. > :03:23.confidence can we have, when the minister cannot even get the basics
:03:24. > :03:31.right? How can we have confidence that they will get the big issues
:03:32. > :03:36.right in education? Look, this process of testing 600,000 pupils is
:03:37. > :03:43.complex, as the Honourable lady will know. We use contractors and on this
:03:44. > :03:47.occasion a mistake was made in uploading the material to a secure
:03:48. > :03:51.website, we took action swiftly when we discovered the mistake, as we did
:03:52. > :03:56.in the spelling test was put on line three weeks ago. It is how you react
:03:57. > :04:05.to these issues that determines the confidence of a government. And we
:04:06. > :04:10.acted swiftly on both occasions. This parent has a child approaching
:04:11. > :04:15.both key stage one and Key stage two, and I find it outrageous that
:04:16. > :04:19.an individual has put my child's chances at risk by making this
:04:20. > :04:23.league. Does the Minister agree with me that it would be better for the
:04:24. > :04:29.opposition to keep that in mind rather than playing politics with
:04:30. > :04:34.children's test results? I do agree with my honourable friend. The whole
:04:35. > :04:39.system does depend on the integrity of professionals. We need a senior
:04:40. > :04:45.markers with access to the material weeks before it goes live. We need
:04:46. > :04:49.test developers with access to individual questions months
:04:50. > :04:55.beforehand. We test the tests with a large number of pupils before we are
:04:56. > :04:58.sure that they are of the right degree of demand. So a whole range
:04:59. > :05:04.of people have access to the material before it goes live. The
:05:05. > :05:09.Minister cannot deal with it, the Department and organise, and the
:05:10. > :05:15.schools do not understand. Does he agree that primary assessment in our
:05:16. > :05:17.schools is nothing short of shambolic? Yet again the
:05:18. > :05:21.professional judgment of professionals is ignored by
:05:22. > :05:27.politicians trying to make short-term gains. How does he reply?
:05:28. > :05:32.These tests were developed by educational professionals, a huge
:05:33. > :05:36.number of such professionals were involved in the development of these
:05:37. > :05:40.tests. A large number of professional educators, head
:05:41. > :05:45.teachers, experienced teachers, were involved in the review of the
:05:46. > :05:49.curriculum. These assessments are assessing the ability of schools to
:05:50. > :05:53.deliver the new curriculum. That new curriculum is more demanding. We do
:05:54. > :05:55.not avoid that point. Now to the Lords for the latest
:05:56. > :06:00.round of parliamentary ping pong. Peers were dealing with the last few
:06:01. > :06:02.amendments where they disagree The Lords reluctantly
:06:03. > :06:05.dropped their objections They then moved on to
:06:06. > :06:21.the government's housing bill. This amendment seeks to do two
:06:22. > :06:26.things. Firstly, it seeks to put beyond doubt that sufficient funding
:06:27. > :06:30.will be available to local authorities to deliver at least one
:06:31. > :06:46.new affordable homes for each higher value property sold. In London this
:06:47. > :06:49.would mean at least two for one. It gives the opportunity for social
:06:50. > :06:54.rented housing where a case was made to the Secretary of State to
:06:55. > :06:57.consider. I understand the reluctance some of this House have
:06:58. > :07:02.about pressing the issue again. I have thought long and hard about
:07:03. > :07:07.these issues and I would not put this forward unless I thought it was
:07:08. > :07:17.of such vital importance. But unless we get this replacement policy right
:07:18. > :07:20.now, funding and discretion, we will inevitably see fewer genuinely
:07:21. > :07:26.affordable homes available. There does come a point when you have to
:07:27. > :07:31.say that fighting back against the will of the elected House is not a
:07:32. > :07:38.profitable course to follow, either as a collective, or as individuals.
:07:39. > :07:41.The government is not able to produce figures defining the meaning
:07:42. > :07:47.of high-value, the number of properties affected, locally or
:07:48. > :07:52.nationally, the likely rate of vacancies, the cost of administering
:07:53. > :07:55.the scheme, how much they will require councils to pay upfront
:07:56. > :07:59.annually, since the bill envisages such payments will be required, and
:08:00. > :08:07.whether or not sales are affected. To misquote Groucho Marx, a child of
:08:08. > :08:12.five could understand the impact of this policy, bring me a child of
:08:13. > :08:18.five. Or, perhaps in these days, a special adviser. Our manifesto made
:08:19. > :08:23.it clear that we wanted to increase home ownership and drive up the
:08:24. > :08:27.availability of new homes, this enables us to deliver both of these
:08:28. > :08:32.commitments, the receipt will be used to give up to 1.3 million
:08:33. > :08:39.housing association tenants the same level of right to buy discount as is
:08:40. > :08:44.enjoyed by local authority tenants for decades. And, as is equally
:08:45. > :08:47.important, it will provide receipts that local authorities who enter
:08:48. > :08:51.into agreements with us can use to provide affordable homes. I urge the
:08:52. > :08:59.House Other Place, recognising that this
:09:00. > :09:02.is a manifesto commitment, and that is the comments have offered
:09:03. > :09:07.financial privilege as a reason for rejecting our amendments, we should
:09:08. > :09:12.be wary of proposing an alternative which would invite the same
:09:13. > :09:13.response. I urge the noble Lords to accept the Commons reasoning and not
:09:14. > :09:16.support this amendment. But peers rejected those appeals -
:09:17. > :09:18.backing Lord Kerslake's amendment and sending the bill back
:09:19. > :09:25.to the Commons again. You are watching Tuesday in
:09:26. > :09:31.Parliament. Everyone wants a negotiated outcome
:09:32. > :09:33.to the junior doctors' dispute, the Health Secretary
:09:34. > :09:34.has told the Commons. Jeremy Hunt insisted the proposed
:09:35. > :09:38.contract was a good deal, and restated his commitment
:09:39. > :09:42.to a seven-day-a-week NHS. But the SNP argued the contract
:09:43. > :09:46.would lead to over-work. Talks between the British Medical
:09:47. > :09:49.Association and the Department of Health began again
:09:50. > :09:54.on Monday night All of us on this side of the House
:09:55. > :09:57.welcome the resumption of talks It's in nobody's interest, not
:09:58. > :10:06.the Government, not junior doctors, certainly not patients, for this
:10:07. > :10:11.dispute to drag on any longer. Can I implore the
:10:12. > :10:14.Health Secretary to do all he can to find a reasonable
:10:15. > :10:20.compromise this week which will keep doctors in the NHS and which will
:10:21. > :10:26.ensure we have a motivated, well trained and fairly rewarded
:10:27. > :10:31.workforce to continue delivering the excellent care
:10:32. > :10:37.we all want to see? Well, can I thank her for
:10:38. > :10:39.her very reasonable tone. Absolutely, I give
:10:40. > :10:42.her that assurance. We have always wanted a negotiated
:10:43. > :10:47.outcome to this dispute. That's why we paused the
:10:48. > :10:50.introduction of the new contracts last November in order to give
:10:51. > :10:54.a chance for talks to succeed. That's why this week,
:10:55. > :10:57.I have said, we will give a further pause
:10:58. > :10:59.in the introduction of the new contracts to see
:11:00. > :11:03.if we can get a negotiated outcome. In his recent letter to the head
:11:04. > :11:06.of the BMA, the Secretary of State offered
:11:07. > :11:09.to discuss improving work-life balance, especially
:11:10. > :11:11.for people, he said, with family
:11:12. > :11:14.responsibilities. How exactly does he plan to do
:11:15. > :11:17.this with a contract that the Government's own quality
:11:18. > :11:21.impact assessment has identified It is worth saying
:11:22. > :11:30.that the reason for this dispute is a manifesto commitment
:11:31. > :11:33.for a seven-day NHS that this Government has made
:11:34. > :11:36.to the people of England that the SNP has not made
:11:37. > :11:39.to the people of Scotland and the weekend effect is something
:11:40. > :11:43.that doesn't just happen in England. There are studies
:11:44. > :11:46.in Scotland as well. Will my right honourable friend bear
:11:47. > :11:48.in mind that Secretary of State Dean Rusk always used
:11:49. > :11:52.to say that jaw-jaw was better than war-war and how welcome
:11:53. > :11:56.it is that the negotiations have resumed with the BMA
:11:57. > :12:00.on this difficult problem? Will he also accept that everyone
:12:01. > :12:05.wishes goodwill to those talks so that we can get
:12:06. > :12:08.meaningful agreement that ensures a seven-day
:12:09. > :12:12.NHS for the benefit The claim is that the only issue
:12:13. > :12:17.is Saturday pay whereas what they tell me is they fear
:12:18. > :12:21.the danger of exhaustion. Has he seen the analysis
:12:22. > :12:24.by the Cass Business School suggesting it is impossible
:12:25. > :12:28.to avoid high levels of fatigue What I've actually done in
:12:29. > :12:36.the new contract is precisely tried to address those issues by reducing
:12:37. > :12:41.the maximum number of hours that junior doctors can be
:12:42. > :12:44.asked to work every week By stopping junior doctors
:12:45. > :12:50.being asked to work six nights in a row or seven
:12:51. > :12:54.long days in a row. These are steps forward
:12:55. > :12:57.and I think she might want to look at Channel 4
:12:58. > :12:59.fact check and other independent analysis
:13:00. > :13:02.of the safety aspects of the new contract
:13:03. > :13:05.which say that this contract I would just say that just stating
:13:06. > :13:10.it doesn't make it happen. They have looked at the rotas
:13:11. > :13:14.as put out as exemplars, and they were not able to avoid
:13:15. > :13:18.high levels of fatigue. I would think the Secretary of State
:13:19. > :13:21.for working so tirelessly to get the BMA back
:13:22. > :13:26.to the negotiation table. Can he confirm that Saturday
:13:27. > :13:28.pay for junior doctors will be 30% premium,
:13:29. > :13:30.which is above that for any of the hard-working midwives,
:13:31. > :13:34.nurses, firefighters, I thank her for her question
:13:35. > :13:42.and she makes a very, very important point that the proposals
:13:43. > :13:45.on the table with the new contract are incredibly generous compared
:13:46. > :13:48.to the other people working in hospitals and that is why
:13:49. > :13:53.it is important that we have some flexibility from the BMA on Saturday
:13:54. > :13:57.pay so that we can deliver this seven-day service
:13:58. > :13:59.that we all want. It is a very good deal
:14:00. > :14:01.for junior doctors. Meanwhile, a shadow health minister
:14:02. > :14:05.congratulated Jeremy Hunt. Can I start by congratulating
:14:06. > :14:07.the Secretary of State for becoming the longest serving
:14:08. > :14:10.Health Secretary in history? It's an important landmark, not
:14:11. > :14:13.least because it's the first target Can I start by thanking
:14:14. > :14:19.my honourable friend for his generous
:14:20. > :14:22.congratulations are earlier and indeed for making history himself
:14:23. > :14:25.by being the first opposition person I can remember actually
:14:26. > :14:28.congratulating Government The Government has played down fears
:14:29. > :14:37.that child refugees stranded in Europe may not be resettled
:14:38. > :14:42.in Britain for seven months. The UK is to accept a number
:14:43. > :14:46.of unaccompanied child refugees, but only those already in Europe
:14:47. > :14:50.before the 20th March. That decision followed pressure
:14:51. > :14:53.from MPs and Peers to accept a change to the Immigration Bill put
:14:54. > :14:57.forward by Labour's Lord Dubs, placing a duty on the Government
:14:58. > :15:02.to accept lone children into the UK. Answering an urgent question,
:15:03. > :15:04.the Immigration Minister We are already acting to implement
:15:05. > :15:10.the bill amendments. We have started discussions
:15:11. > :15:12.with local Government. We have begun work with European
:15:13. > :15:16.partners and NGOs We will bring refugee
:15:17. > :15:20.children to the UK And I am proud that
:15:21. > :15:26.the commitment of this country, this Government is to help those
:15:27. > :15:29.in need both within and outside Europe stands in comparison
:15:30. > :15:39.with any other country in the world. His comments came after
:15:40. > :15:41.Downing Street was reported to have said the first children would arrive
:15:42. > :15:44.by the end of this year. We hear the warm words and we hear
:15:45. > :15:47.the commitment, and yet at the same time, Number 10 seems
:15:48. > :15:49.to be dragging its feet. To have only the first children
:15:50. > :15:52.by the end of the year We know that Help Refugees,
:15:53. > :15:56.Citizens UK and the Red Cross already have details
:15:57. > :15:59.of children in Europe with family Unicef said yesterday,
:16:00. > :16:04.with the political will, these children could have
:16:05. > :16:08.their cases processed and be here in time, packing their pencil
:16:09. > :16:12.cases for the new school year So why will the Government
:16:13. > :16:16.not make a commitment to at least clear all of the family
:16:17. > :16:19.cases that they have in the system already by the time we get
:16:20. > :16:22.to the summer holidays? We do intend to make progress
:16:23. > :16:30.cheering the course of this year and therefore the first
:16:31. > :16:32.children will arrive before the end of this year but that
:16:33. > :16:34.does not mean... It will take seven months
:16:35. > :16:37.and I think she will recognise from everything that I have said both
:16:38. > :16:40.last night and also today, that we are quickly making progress
:16:41. > :16:42.to implement the provisions within the Dubs amendments
:16:43. > :16:48.in the immigration bill. Britain is being generous in its
:16:49. > :16:52.support for refugees both in the region and vulnerable people coming
:16:53. > :16:56.to this country but there is a big danger, because human
:16:57. > :16:59.traffickers are evil people who will exploit any opportunity
:17:00. > :17:03.for their vile trade, that the message will go out
:17:04. > :17:05.from these people, Britain is open now to child refugees,
:17:06. > :17:09.send us your children, Will the Minister give us
:17:10. > :17:16.a commitment today that the scheme will be properly funded
:17:17. > :17:19.and will he give us some idea of what he's going to do
:17:20. > :17:22.about funding the scheme, rather than just describing
:17:23. > :17:24.the present existing arrangements? What we need from the Minister today
:17:25. > :17:27.is not placatory words, we need a decisive action plan
:17:28. > :17:32.with a very clear timetable. We want to make progress quickly
:17:33. > :17:38.in the weeks and months ahead. On funding, these are issues
:17:39. > :17:41.that we are discussing He will be aware that
:17:42. > :17:44.unaccompanied asylum-seeking children are already funded
:17:45. > :17:49.when they arrive in the UK and that there are clear funding
:17:50. > :17:52.arrangements to local authorities. I think we need to be
:17:53. > :17:55.cognisant of that and we will be looking closely at how we
:17:56. > :17:58.implement consistent with a number Concerns over levels
:17:59. > :18:04.of immigration into the UK were raised in the Lords,
:18:05. > :18:08.where one former Cabinet minister asked if Labour was dedicated
:18:09. > :18:12.to an open door policy to let more The million or so refugees that
:18:13. > :18:20.Angela Merkel has accepted will soon have the right to come here
:18:21. > :18:26.and the Turks could be the next, adding to the overload
:18:27. > :18:28.on our hospitals, schools and houses, greatly
:18:29. > :18:32.to the detriment Is he also surprised
:18:33. > :18:39.that the effect of uncontrolled immigration from the EU
:18:40. > :18:43.on the stability of our nation and on
:18:44. > :18:48.the welfare of working people appears not to be of
:18:49. > :18:52.concern, with very few exceptions, Since 2010, reforms have cut abuse
:18:53. > :18:58.from the student and family visa systems and raised standards
:18:59. > :19:01.in the work routes. In addition, of course,
:19:02. > :19:05.our recent negotiations in Europe have brought to fruition
:19:06. > :19:10.the provision for a new settlement agreement on EU migrants with
:19:11. > :19:13.the requirement for a seven-year The minister has told
:19:14. > :19:21.us how wonderful is the Government's investment
:19:22. > :19:23.in public services, apparently to meet all the concerns
:19:24. > :19:27.of the noble Lord, Lord Vincent, but could he then
:19:28. > :19:30.explain why there is a shortage of primary school places,
:19:31. > :19:33.for example, in London? Why our health service in so many
:19:34. > :19:37.areas is in crisis, why there is a problem with social care
:19:38. > :19:42.beds becoming unviable? Why is all of that happening
:19:43. > :19:44.if the Government's policies towards the public services
:19:45. > :19:48.have been so benign? Can the noble Minister tell
:19:49. > :19:51.the House why the Government is not building more new hospitals,
:19:52. > :19:54.schools and housing, using the additional income
:19:55. > :19:57.the Government is receiving from foreign workers who are paying
:19:58. > :20:00.significant sums in Very considerable sums
:20:01. > :20:05.are being expended in these areas and indeed we expect
:20:06. > :20:09.to deliver 600,000 new school places I would like to remind the House
:20:10. > :20:14.that the National Health would not run if it weren't for people
:20:15. > :20:20.from abroad with high qualifications who are willing to work
:20:21. > :20:23.in the National Health Whether he has had any success
:20:24. > :20:31.in establishing a bipartisan policy towards reducing immigration to tens
:20:32. > :20:38.of thousands a year, or is the opposition
:20:39. > :20:41.dedicated to an open door, migrants in with no idea of
:20:42. > :20:49.how we shall pay not just for the schools and the hospitals
:20:50. > :20:52.but the roads, the water works, the power stations
:20:53. > :20:55.and everything else? Whose side does my noble friend
:20:56. > :21:00.think the opposition are on? The British people
:21:01. > :21:03.or the foreigners? I believe that all members of this
:21:04. > :21:16.House would recognise the importance of a controlled migration system
:21:17. > :21:22.that brings us the best and is the The Home Secretary,
:21:23. > :21:26.Theresa May, appeared in front of the committee of MPs that
:21:27. > :21:30.scrutinises her department. It was taking evidence
:21:31. > :21:32.from her ahead of June's referendum Mrs May made a speech in April
:21:33. > :21:38.saying the UK should remain in. The committee chairman began
:21:39. > :21:41.by asking about the deportation The Prime Minister was quite
:21:42. > :21:48.critical of the Home Office last week at the liaison committee as far
:21:49. > :21:51.as foreign national prisoners are concerned because there are 4217 EU
:21:52. > :21:56.nationals in our prisons who should not really be there, they should be
:21:57. > :21:59.back in their own countries, Just to refresh your
:22:00. > :22:04.memory, he said that the Government should
:22:05. > :22:06.have done better. Now, in making the argument
:22:07. > :22:10.for staying in the EU, surely a powerful point must be because we
:22:11. > :22:15.are in the EU, we can send back their nationals after they finish
:22:16. > :22:20.their sentences and I know that you have been very strong
:22:21. > :22:25.in all the meetings at the EU summits trying to get these
:22:26. > :22:27.countries to take their foreign
:22:28. > :22:29.nationals back. Now the Prime Minister has said
:22:30. > :22:32.you should have done better. What more can we do if we stay
:22:33. > :22:35.in the EU to persuade Poland and Ireland and all these
:22:36. > :22:38.other countries Well, first of all, chairman,
:22:39. > :22:44.I believe that the Prime Minister's response on foreign
:22:45. > :22:47.national prisoners was in response to a question as you
:22:48. > :22:49.asked him on this issue. I know this has been a matter
:22:50. > :22:52.of interest to you I think what he said was that
:22:53. > :22:55.in some cases I can't remember exactly
:22:56. > :22:58.the phrase he used... He also said that it was
:22:59. > :23:04.incredibly difficult in some cases to do this and for a whole variety
:23:05. > :23:10.of reasons and he also, I think, made clear that the National
:23:11. > :23:13.Security Council actually looks at this issue on a six monthly basis
:23:14. > :23:16.and one of the things that the Prime Minister has been very keen to do
:23:17. > :23:20.is to ensure that this is a question that is taken across Government
:23:21. > :23:25.and isn't simply a matter of one department lobbying in order to
:23:26. > :23:30.improve the way we do this I think there are advantages
:23:31. > :23:34.obviously to being within It's not just about
:23:35. > :23:38.the possible return of foreign national offenders after they have
:23:39. > :23:40.completed their sentences, but it's also starting to now
:23:41. > :23:48.operate, the prisoner transfer framework and the prisoner transfer
:23:49. > :23:51.agreements that we have people to ensure that they can
:23:52. > :23:56.complete their sentences. But it has clearly not worked
:23:57. > :23:59.in the last six years. If we come out, will it be more
:24:00. > :24:04.difficult to persuade EU partners If we are making the case to stay
:24:05. > :24:09.in, as you and I are, and this committee
:24:10. > :24:11.is not having an inquiry into this because we will probably
:24:12. > :24:14.not agree a report, But one of the positive arguments
:24:15. > :24:18.for staying in is to say that if we stay in,
:24:19. > :24:21.you can go to the Polish home affairs minister
:24:22. > :24:23.and say, well, we've got a thousand
:24:24. > :24:26.Poles in our prisons. Well, one of the reasons why it
:24:27. > :24:35.hasn't happened is because the prisoner transfer framework
:24:36. > :24:38.hasn't been fully put into place That is in process at the moment
:24:39. > :24:45.but the fundamental point that you are making I think
:24:46. > :24:48.is a right one which is that if you are part of the
:24:49. > :24:50.European Union, dealing directly with people,
:24:51. > :24:53.operating within these frameworks, then it is easier, I believe,
:24:54. > :24:57.being Home Secretary from everything I've seen from my experience,
:24:58. > :25:00.that we are safer and more secure
:25:01. > :25:02.inside the European Union The by-election in London mayor
:25:03. > :25:09.Sadiq Khan's former Tooting constituency has been formally
:25:10. > :25:13.triggered after Labour's Chief Whip moved the writ to fill the vacancy
:25:14. > :25:17.in the House of Commons. Rosie Winterton moved the writ
:25:18. > :25:20.to initiate the poll at the start of Tuesday's Commons' business,
:25:21. > :25:24.and the Labour whips' office said it expects the by-election
:25:25. > :25:27.to take place on either Mr Khan is stepping down as an MP
:25:28. > :25:33.after he comfortably defeated the Conservative Zac Goldsmith
:25:34. > :25:39.to become Mayor of London. And that's it for now,
:25:40. > :25:42.but do join me at the same time tomorrow when among other things
:25:43. > :25:46.we'll have the highlights from PMQs. But for now from me,
:25:47. > :25:53.Alicia McCarthy, goodbye.