:00:18. > :00:19.Hello and welcome to Tuesday In Parliament,
:00:20. > :00:22.our look at the best of the day in the Commons and the Lords.
:00:23. > :00:26.Expansion of Heathrow Airport is given the go-ahead
:00:27. > :00:34.Heathrow expansion is neithdr possible nor deliverable.
:00:35. > :00:37.It delivers the greatest economic and strategic
:00:38. > :00:41.May I congratulate my right honourable friend in taking
:00:42. > :00:43.the right decision in the interests of the United Kingdom?
:00:44. > :00:45.The Government should not be in the business
:00:46. > :00:50.MPs delve into so-called "revolving-door syndrome",
:00:51. > :00:54.when an ex-Minister gets a job in business after politics.
:00:55. > :00:58.Can you tell me what you've done in your two years in office
:00:59. > :01:03.that gives you satisfaction, where you served the public interdst?
:01:04. > :01:06.I take pleasure in every dax, Mr Flynn, as I'm sure
:01:07. > :01:11.And the Chancellor sounds a warning on Brexit.
:01:12. > :01:13.European politicians are very conscious of
:01:14. > :01:19.the impact of Britain's dep`rture and their political project.
:01:20. > :01:24.The Government has given its blessing to an expansion
:01:25. > :01:29.The decision has been long `waited, but it may not be final.
:01:30. > :01:34.Parliament will vote in a ydar's time on the third runway pl`n.
:01:35. > :01:37.There could still then be years of legal argument.
:01:38. > :01:39.Heathrow, Britain's only hub airport,
:01:40. > :01:46.is currently at 98% capacitx, handling 480,000 flights a xear
:01:47. > :01:50.That compares with 700,000 flights a year at Amsterdam,
:01:51. > :01:58.A third runway at Heathrow will cost around ?17 billion.
:01:59. > :02:03.Construction over the next decade could create 77,000 jobs.
:02:04. > :02:06.In the Commons, the Transport Secretary said the decision to
:02:07. > :02:12.go ahead with Heathrow expansion safeguarded the UK's prosperity
:02:13. > :02:13.Last year, Britain's airports handled
:02:14. > :02:20.Heathrow is the busiest two,runway airport in the world,
:02:21. > :02:24.and Gatwick the busiest single-runway airport.
:02:25. > :02:29.Indeed, the London system whll be almost entirely full by 2030,
:02:30. > :02:33.with the exception of a small amount of capacity at Luton,
:02:34. > :02:35.and that will be taken up soon afterwards.
:02:36. > :02:39.If we do nothing, the cost to our nation is significant,
:02:40. > :02:41.amounting to more than ?20 billion over 60 years through delays,
:02:42. > :02:46.fewer flights and passengers having to fly from airports elsewhdre.
:02:47. > :02:49.In addition, the wider impacts on our economy are in the rdgion
:02:50. > :02:54.That is why the decision we have reached today is so important
:02:55. > :03:00.He said the detailed study of the Airports Commission,
:03:01. > :03:02.led by the economist Howard Davies, recommended a new North-West
:03:03. > :03:08.The commission's report and the subsequent informathon
:03:09. > :03:11.formed the basis of the discussion that took place this morning
:03:12. > :03:17.As a result of that discusshon, the Government have decided
:03:18. > :03:22.We believe that the expansion of Heathrow airport
:03:23. > :03:25.and the north-west runway scheme, in combination with a significant
:03:26. > :03:29.package of supporting measures on the scale recommended
:03:30. > :03:32.by the Airports Commission, offers the greatest benefit
:03:33. > :03:35.to passengers and business, and will help us to deliver
:03:36. > :03:42.the broadest possible benefht to the whole United Kingdom.
:03:43. > :03:45.It delivers the greatest economic and strategic
:03:46. > :03:49.It strengthens connectivity for passengers right
:03:50. > :03:55.It offers a major boost to freight operators.
:03:56. > :03:59.It can be delivered within carbon and air quality limits
:04:00. > :04:01.and, crucially, it comes with world-leading measures
:04:02. > :04:05.to limit the impacts on those living nearby.
:04:06. > :04:08.There have been recent suggdstions in the media that the process has
:04:09. > :04:21.Members will remember the s`ga of the planning process
:04:22. > :04:25.behind Terminal 5, which took years to resolve.
:04:26. > :04:28.He said a consultation procdss will start in the New year.
:04:29. > :04:31.The issue of runway capacitx in the south-east has
:04:32. > :04:34.challenged successive Administrations for decades.
:04:35. > :04:36.There are strong feelings both for and against
:04:37. > :04:45.This is not the scheme that was previously promoted in 2009.
:04:46. > :04:47.It does much more to mitigate environmental impacts,
:04:48. > :04:51.to compensate communities and to distribute benefits
:04:52. > :04:57.Today's announcement is not the end of the process,
:04:58. > :05:02.It beggars belief that it h`s taken Ministers more than a year
:05:03. > :05:06.since the publication of thd Davies report even to make a start.
:05:07. > :05:08.Just what have they been dohng for all these months,
:05:09. > :05:11.apart from worrying about splits in the Cabinet,
:05:12. > :05:12.and the Foreign Secretary throwing himself in front
:05:13. > :05:17.of the bulldozers and former mayoral candidates triggering by-eldctions?
:05:18. > :05:22.There is no justification for dithering on this scale.
:05:23. > :05:25.He has failed to provide the shorter timescale
:05:26. > :05:28.for getting to the national policy statement that was set out
:05:29. > :05:36.The lack of a vote in this House for more than a year will not allow
:05:37. > :05:39.and the soap opera will therefore continue.
:05:40. > :05:42.That said, we welcome the announcement of Heathrow
:05:43. > :05:49.Although airport expansion of this type disproportionately bendfits
:05:50. > :05:51.the south-east of England, it has strategic consequencds
:05:52. > :05:58.Mr Speaker, I congratulate ly right honourable friend for taking
:05:59. > :06:09.the right decision in the interest of the United Kingdom.
:06:10. > :06:11.Could he remind the House how much passenger traffic
:06:12. > :06:14.much freight traffic is currently being lost to mainland European
:06:15. > :06:17.airports as a result of lack of capacity in the south-east?
:06:18. > :06:19.I believe that this decision is misguided and not ultimately
:06:20. > :06:23.Will the Secretary of State assure me that in the consultation
:06:24. > :06:26.and scrutiny to come there will be good and adequate scientific data,
:06:27. > :06:28.because the evidence will show that Heathrow expansion is neithdr
:06:29. > :06:34.In the Minister's words, we do not want expansion "at any cost" -
:06:35. > :06:38.this is the wrong scheme and the price is too high.
:06:39. > :06:43.The decision to build a new runway at Heathrow is the right ond,
:06:44. > :06:45.but it is absolutely vital that the Secretary of State delivers
:06:46. > :06:48.on his pledge to ensure that the benefits of expanshon
:06:49. > :06:52.are felt in every nation and region of the UK.
:06:53. > :06:54.As the chair of the Gatwick co-ordination group,
:06:55. > :06:57.I congratulate my right honourable friend on this announcement and make
:06:58. > :07:03.with which this somewhat ovdrdue statement will be received
:07:04. > :07:11.by all the people representdd by colleagues in the group.
:07:12. > :07:16.The Government have chosen ` course that is not only wrong but doomed.
:07:17. > :07:19.It is wrong because of the lillion people who will suffer
:07:20. > :07:21.directly on the back of the environmental harm this
:07:22. > :07:27.It is doomed because the complexities, cost and legal
:07:28. > :07:30.complications mean that the project is almost certainly not
:07:31. > :07:35.I believe it will be a millstone around the Government's neck
:07:36. > :07:39.for many years to come - a constant source of delay,
:07:40. > :07:45.Is not the biggest loser from the Tory civil war
:07:46. > :07:48.over Heathrow neither the Foreign Secretary nor the honourabld
:07:49. > :07:50.member for Richmond Park but transport everywhere else?
:07:51. > :07:53.For over five years, there has been an obsessive focus
:07:54. > :07:58.While welcoming this decision, may I ask the Homd
:07:59. > :08:01.Counties-based Cabinet to lhsten to what William Hague has s`id
:08:02. > :08:06.today, and set out in the attumn statement a clear timetable for HS3,
:08:07. > :08:11.linking Manchester Airport to the great cities of the north?
:08:12. > :08:15.This is a devastating decishon for the national economic interest
:08:16. > :08:18.as well as for my constituents, hundreds of whose homes will be
:08:19. > :08:21.bulldozed, and for the millhons of people affected by the vdry loud
:08:22. > :08:27.This statement has been long overdue.
:08:28. > :08:32.Some countries will have developed three entire nuclear power stations
:08:33. > :08:36.and five airports in the amount of time this has taken to bd kicked
:08:37. > :08:39.into the long grass by two Labour Prime Ministers and H am
:08:40. > :08:42.afraid a Conservative Prime Minister too.
:08:43. > :08:45.I do not share this cosy consensus on airport expansion.
:08:46. > :08:47.Half the population each year does not fly -
:08:48. > :08:50.for environmental reasons, I have not flown for several years.
:08:51. > :08:53.The Secretary of State said today that this expansion would
:08:54. > :09:00.Because of climate change, the Government should not bd
:09:01. > :09:03.in the business of encouraghng people to fly and encouraging more
:09:04. > :09:06.air freight, let alone subshdising increased airport capacity
:09:07. > :09:12.I urge the Secretary of State and the Government to think again.
:09:13. > :09:14.Why are the Government disrdgarding "widespread hostility",
:09:15. > :09:17.and bulldozing through a thhrd runway which will inflict
:09:18. > :09:21.crippling noise, significant climate change effects,
:09:22. > :09:25.health-damaging pollution and catastrophic congestion
:09:26. > :09:32.Because we do not believe that it is going to do thosd
:09:33. > :09:36.things, because we do not bdlieve that it will create the air
:09:37. > :09:40.because we do not believe that it will impose
:09:41. > :09:43.I have already explained the position
:09:44. > :09:45.relating to public transport access and improved
:09:46. > :09:51.And there was also plenty of reaction to the Heathrow
:09:52. > :09:54.expansion announcement over in the House of Lords.
:09:55. > :09:59.Many young people at the job centres in West London know how important
:10:00. > :10:07.that skilled employment is at Heathrow.
:10:08. > :10:11.So I do say, let's get on whth it and make a plea to those people
:10:12. > :10:14.who are opposed to it to look at the depth and qu`lity
:10:15. > :10:17.of the evidence in favour from business, from trade unions -
:10:18. > :10:20.all the trade unions bar one, all of them -
:10:21. > :10:24.and say this project needs to go ahead.
:10:25. > :10:27.With all of business crying out for this to happen and yet
:10:28. > :10:30.all this opposition, there is going to be a lot
:10:31. > :10:34.Why didn't the Government then go ahead, as my noble friend s`id
:10:35. > :10:37.earlier, and allow Gatwick and Heathrow to expand?
:10:38. > :10:40.The Gatwick expansion, wouldn't the noble lord agrde,
:10:41. > :10:49.Will my noble friend considdr that expanding Heathrow will increase
:10:50. > :10:53.foreign monopoly and power, and we can airport competithon
:10:54. > :11:01.It will affect hundreds of thousands more people than Gatwick wotld have,
:11:02. > :11:04.it will add to safety and sdcurity risks by sending hundreds
:11:05. > :11:11.of thousands more flights over our most densely populated areas,
:11:12. > :11:13.it will cost ?8,000 million, at least, more
:11:14. > :11:16.than the proposed Gatwick option, and it will take longer to build
:11:17. > :11:20.than the proposed Gatwick option, keeping Britain closed
:11:21. > :11:26.I must declare an interest as living under the flight path
:11:27. > :11:32.the Heathrow Association of the Control of Aircraft Noise.
:11:33. > :11:35.The announcement acknowledgds that the current constraints
:11:36. > :11:42.by talking about more reliable respite.
:11:43. > :11:45.The Minister will be aware that the measurements
:11:46. > :11:49.of noise do not accord with the residents' experience.
:11:50. > :11:51.I'm sure he will also agree that the best predictor
:11:52. > :12:01.A Bill designed to help clalp down on money-laundering
:12:02. > :12:05.and prevent the financing of terrorist activity has bden given
:12:06. > :12:12.The Criminal Finances Bill hs also aimed increasing the retrieval rate
:12:13. > :12:18.It creates so-called "unexplained wealth orders" which may repuire
:12:19. > :12:22.an individual to explain thd sources of his or her wealth.
:12:23. > :12:24.The Commons has held its first debate
:12:25. > :12:32.Some of the most expensive properties in the capital
:12:33. > :12:37.are unoccupied because they have been bought solely for the purpose
:12:38. > :12:45.So, in 2016, money-laundering is something that is not just
:12:46. > :12:52.happening in accountancy offices or in the back rooms of banks,
:12:53. > :12:57.it is happening in plain sight of ordinary Londoners.
:12:58. > :13:01.Because we see some of the lost expensive domestic propertids
:13:02. > :13:04.in the world change hands, but remain mysteriously
:13:05. > :13:11.We should be rightly proud of the UK's status
:13:12. > :13:19.This is the one of the best places in the world to do business,
:13:20. > :13:22.but we must recognise the shze of our financial sector and open
:13:23. > :13:27.economy and the attractivendss of London property market
:13:28. > :13:29.to overseas investors makes this country unusually exposed
:13:30. > :13:34.to the risks of internation`l money-laundering.
:13:35. > :13:37.That is why the Government hs taking action to combat money-laundering,
:13:38. > :13:38.terrorist finance and corruption here and overseas.
:13:39. > :13:41.We are sending a clear mess`ge that we will not stand
:13:42. > :13:44.for money-laundering or the funding of terrorism through the UK.
:13:45. > :13:45.After the global financial crisis, property in London
:13:46. > :13:48.has become one of the safest investments in the world,
:13:49. > :13:50.one which rich criminals and money-launderers attracted
:13:51. > :13:53.to in just the same way as people who have made their
:13:54. > :13:58.Put shortly, Londoners want this stain removing from their chty,
:13:59. > :14:06.We will not trigger a divishon on this Bill this evening,
:14:07. > :14:09.but we want to reiterate very, very firmly that this Bill does not
:14:10. > :14:12.go anywhere near far enough in dealing with what I think
:14:13. > :14:16.is a real and tangible outcry from the public,
:14:17. > :14:19.given what has happened over the last five, six, seven ydars
:14:20. > :14:23.If we are serious about maintaining and creating confidence
:14:24. > :14:25.in the banking system again, which has completely evapor`ted
:14:26. > :14:28.then we need to tackle this issue head on and do more
:14:29. > :14:35.You're watching our round-up of the day in the Commons and the Lords.
:14:36. > :14:37.Still to come: Are too many ex-Government Ministers takhng up
:14:38. > :14:40.jobs in the business world secured because of their days
:14:41. > :14:50.The Chancellor has warned MPs not to assume that the negotiathons
:14:51. > :14:53.on the UK's exit from the European Union will onlx be
:14:54. > :15:02.Britain's departure, he said, would impact on EU's
:15:03. > :15:06.He also gave a warning that leaving the European single market
:15:07. > :15:08.for goods and services - the so-called Hard Brexit option -
:15:09. > :15:10.could be "quite challenging" for British firms.
:15:11. > :15:16.The subject was raised by the SNP's spokesman.
:15:17. > :15:19.What efforts is the Chancellor making to rule out a hard Brexit,
:15:20. > :15:21.with visas, tariff barriers and an end to the customs union
:15:22. > :15:24.all of which the Treasury s`ys could lead to the loss
:15:25. > :15:27.of ?66 billion of revenue, a reduction in GDP of around 7. %
:15:28. > :15:28.and a threat, estimated conservatively, to
:15:29. > :15:38.The Prime Minister has been very clear.
:15:39. > :15:41.We understand the instructions that we have received
:15:42. > :15:45.from the British people, and within our obligation to deliver
:15:46. > :15:48.those we will seek to get the very best deal we can
:15:49. > :15:50.with the European Union that maximises the amount of trade
:15:51. > :15:52.in goods and services between our companies
:15:53. > :15:54.and the markets of the European Union, and between European
:15:55. > :16:02.Financial services are one of the sectors most exposed
:16:03. > :16:05.to Brexit, but it is not just jobs in Canary Wharf and the squ`re
:16:06. > :16:08.mile that are at risk; it is jobs throughout the UK,
:16:09. > :16:10.in Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham, Edinburgh and beyond.
:16:11. > :16:14.The messages that the Government have sent so far have been
:16:15. > :16:20.Firms need assurance that they will get comparable access
:16:21. > :16:23.to the single market and thd ability to retain EU nationals
:16:24. > :16:26.Will the Chancellor help finally to put an end to his Governlent s
:16:27. > :16:32.chaos today and make a promise to deliver both?
:16:33. > :16:33.The honourable gentleman is right to identify financial
:16:34. > :16:36.services as one of the areas that is particularly concerned
:16:37. > :16:41.about the way in which the dxit from the European Union is lanaged,
:16:42. > :16:46.because the industry is particularly dependent on the passporting
:16:47. > :16:50.He is also right to draw attention to the often overlooked fact that
:16:51. > :16:52.75% of financial services jobs are outside London.
:16:53. > :17:00.This is an important UK-wide industry.
:17:01. > :17:02.Financial services, he said, would be at the heart
:17:03. > :17:04.We understand their need for market access.
:17:05. > :17:07.We also understand their nedd to be able to engage the right
:17:08. > :17:15.I have said on the record - I am happy to say this again today -
:17:16. > :17:17.that I do not believe that the concerns the British people
:17:18. > :17:21.have expressed about migrathon from the European Union rel`te
:17:22. > :17:23.to those with high skills and high pay.
:17:24. > :17:28.The problem that people are concerned about relates to those
:17:29. > :17:32.I see no likelihood of our tsing powers to control migration
:17:33. > :17:34.into the UK to prevent comp`nies from bringing highly skilled,
:17:35. > :17:42.Unless, bizarrely, the European Union were to hmpose
:17:43. > :17:45.trade sanctions on the UK, there would be absolutely nothing
:17:46. > :17:48.to prevent us from having access to the single market
:17:49. > :17:55.My honourable friend is right in the sense that every
:17:56. > :17:58.nation that is a member of the World Trade Organisation
:17:59. > :18:05.as we are, has the right to access other members' markets on WTO terms.
:18:06. > :18:07.However, WTO terms would be quite challenging
:18:08. > :18:10.For example, in the automothve industry, WTO terms imply
:18:11. > :18:23.a 10% tariff on cars entering other markets.
:18:24. > :18:25.May I suggest that as there is a large balance of payments
:18:26. > :18:27.deficit with Europe, specifically in the automothve
:18:28. > :18:30.sector, it would be in the DU's interest to strike a decent deal
:18:31. > :18:41.Our intention is to get the very best deal we can with our ndighbours
:18:42. > :18:46.in the European Union to allow access for our companies
:18:47. > :18:49.to trade their goods and services into the EU.
:18:50. > :18:50.However, I would just caution my honourable Friend:
:18:51. > :18:57.to look at the economic argtments alone is to miss an important point.
:18:58. > :19:01.There is a political debate going on here in Europe,
:19:02. > :19:05.and European politicians ard very conscious of the impact
:19:06. > :19:08.of Britain's departure on their political project.
:19:09. > :19:11.I do not think we can be certain that economics alone will dhctate
:19:12. > :19:20.A year ago it was learnt th`t more than a dozen politicians
:19:21. > :19:23.who were Ministers during the years of the Con-Lib-Dem Coalition
:19:24. > :19:27.Government had accepted poshtions with companies and charities they'd
:19:28. > :19:29.come across in their ministerial roles.
:19:30. > :19:32.The disclosure led to calls for tighter controls on what's known
:19:33. > :19:34.as the "revolving door" between politics and the business
:19:35. > :19:36.world, by which ex-Ministers are able to gain employment thanks
:19:37. > :19:38.to contacts they've made during their ministerial ye`rs.
:19:39. > :19:41.Already in place is a body called Acoba, or the Advisory Commhttee
:19:42. > :19:47.But when its chairman came `long to a Commons committee hearhng,
:19:48. > :20:02.MPs questioned whether Acob` was achieving very much.
:20:03. > :20:12.We've preferred to Private dye before and in their report, public
:20:13. > :20:19.servants and private paydays, they said that 367 jobs, which h`ve
:20:20. > :20:29.sought clearance from Acoba since 2010, zero times Acoba has refused
:20:30. > :20:37.them. Given that, as evidence of your organisation, how good are you
:20:38. > :20:42.in policing? We're not a regulatory body, with an advisory body. I have
:20:43. > :20:46.to cite two things. We had `n advisory body, not a regulatory
:20:47. > :20:49.body. We don't have the powdr to deprive people of employment, that
:20:50. > :20:53.is backed up by the restraint of trade law that we have to bdar in
:20:54. > :20:59.mind. If you're asking me, why don't we just let these things run their
:21:00. > :21:05.course and go to court as the most certainly would, I suspect
:21:06. > :21:08.applicants would certainly have .. I think there is indication from
:21:09. > :21:12.monetary cases we dealt with, would have their financial backing of the
:21:13. > :21:17.people who wanted to employ them to mount a legal challenge. How many
:21:18. > :21:22.times have you advised formdr ministers that what they were
:21:23. > :21:28.proposing to terms of the job was unacceptable? Where would the public
:21:29. > :21:32.find that information? Everxthing is in the public domain. Most of the
:21:33. > :21:39.things in the press are onlx there because Acoba has a website that we
:21:40. > :21:45.publish on. It couldn't be lore transparent. When you say mhnisters,
:21:46. > :21:50.we obviously apply different rules in individual cases, to Wii make
:21:51. > :22:01.2-to-1 minister, wait for shx months -- we might see to one minister --
:22:02. > :22:04.say, wait for six months, that is the way we can get them to lodify
:22:05. > :22:08.any potential behaviour that they might have had in taking up the
:22:09. > :22:15.post, but we haven't got thd power to tell somebody they cannot do
:22:16. > :22:21.they cannot work. They could just shrug their shoulders and s`y OK,
:22:22. > :22:25.but in the main, people comd to Acoba and they take our advhce.
:22:26. > :22:33.Isn't it to the ultimate power you have is the same as people who
:22:34. > :22:39.ignore your together, the stmmit of your powers is to send a letter to
:22:40. > :22:43.them expressing your disple`sure? We add an advisory committee, not
:22:44. > :22:51.regulatory. I can't repeat that enough. We had an advisory
:22:52. > :22:56.committee. I'm well aware of that, but due to years in office, is a
:22:57. > :23:04.giddy satisfaction to serve the public interest? I take in ht every
:23:05. > :23:11.day -- I take pleasure in it. We worked diligently and ethic`lly I'm
:23:12. > :23:14.trying to get to the numbers. Is Acoba doing anything good you said
:23:15. > :23:20.you have made a lot of defence is about Acoba and the people there and
:23:21. > :23:25.there are rights of work. How is the public interest being served by
:23:26. > :23:30.Acoba in preventing the abuse of the revolving door? We have considered
:23:31. > :23:36.each individual case and those that take up the advice and who take up
:23:37. > :23:40.the job, we have put that into the public domain. Had we not done that,
:23:41. > :23:45.if we didn't do that as Acoba, these things would be a secret and down to
:23:46. > :23:48.investigative journalists to unearth and put them into the public domain.
:23:49. > :23:50.Investigative journalists don't need to do that, they only have to visit
:23:51. > :23:51.our website. Earlier this month,
:23:52. > :23:54.Sir Cliff Richard came to P`rliament to ask MPs and peers to grant
:23:55. > :23:59.anonymity to people The singer says he fears he will be
:24:00. > :24:02.forever "tainted" by false allegations made
:24:03. > :24:04.against him two years ago. In June, the Crown Prosecuthon
:24:05. > :24:07.Service announced it would bring no charges
:24:08. > :24:11.after a lengthy police inquhry. In the House of Lords,
:24:12. > :24:14.a senior Conservative voiced concerns about the ease
:24:15. > :24:16.with which the reputations of In relation to allegations of sexual
:24:17. > :24:30.abuse, does my noble friend agree that many people are asking
:24:31. > :24:33.themselves and Members of both Houses of Parliament
:24:34. > :24:34.whether the presumption of hnnocence until proved guilty
:24:35. > :24:36.is still in existence? Is it not our duty to take `ction -
:24:37. > :24:39.either by instituting anonylity until the point of charge,
:24:40. > :24:42.as backed by the Director of Public Prosecutions last week,
:24:43. > :24:44.or by other effective means - to reduce the terrible toll
:24:45. > :24:47.of suffering caused by falsd and malicious allegations
:24:48. > :24:48.against innocent people Finally, do the Government `gree
:24:49. > :24:54.that the institutions of both state and church need to show much greater
:24:55. > :24:59.concern for the reputations of eminent people from the past
:25:00. > :25:16.who cannot speak for themselves It is important to say
:25:17. > :25:18.that there is a very fine The voicing of victims' concerns
:25:19. > :25:22.and the naming of people in the public interest to allow
:25:23. > :25:25.further evidence or further victims to come forward needs to be balanced
:25:26. > :25:28.with the right to privacy and protection of the person
:25:29. > :25:39.who is suspected. Do join me for our
:25:40. > :25:44.next daily round-up. Until then, from me,
:25:45. > :25:52.Keith Macdougall, goodbye.