18/07/2017

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:23. > :00:26.Coming up: As the Prime Minister urges her Cabinet to stop leaking,

:00:27. > :00:31.over his comments on public sector pay.

:00:32. > :00:33.Ministers are told a free child care scheme is full of holes

:00:34. > :00:38.And: calls on the government to do more over reports

:00:39. > :00:48.of the imminent execution of 14 men in Saudi Arabia.

:00:49. > :00:55.When will this government decide that it is time to publicly condemn

:00:56. > :00:59.these abuses of human rights? Our silence is deafening.

:01:00. > :01:03.Theresa May has told her Cabinet ministers to show "strength

:01:04. > :01:05.and unity" as she attempts to stem a series of leaks

:01:06. > :01:08.The Prime Minister said "open discussion" was important

:01:09. > :01:10.but it was vital for it to stay private.

:01:11. > :01:12.Newspaper reports over the weekend claimed

:01:13. > :01:17.that the Chancellor Philip Hammond had said in a Cabinet meeting that

:01:18. > :01:19.public sector workers were "overpaid".

:01:20. > :01:22.On the BBC's Andrew Marr Show, Mr Hammond defended his stance,

:01:23. > :01:27.saying public sector pay had "raced ahead" of the private sector

:01:28. > :01:32.after the economic crash and while, in terms of salary, that gap had now

:01:33. > :01:34.closed, there was a 10% disparity when pension contributions

:01:35. > :01:44.The Shadow Chancellor raised the remarks at Treasury Questions.

:01:45. > :01:48.Does the secretary agree that it ill becomes a multimillionaire,

:01:49. > :01:53.earning ?145,000 a year, admittedly in a temporary job,

:01:54. > :01:58.and living in two grace and favour properties at taxpayers' expense

:01:59. > :02:02.to attack public sector workers, our hospital cleaners, nurses,

:02:03. > :02:06.teachers and firefighters, as being "overpaid"?

:02:07. > :02:10.Public sector workers' pay has fallen, on average,

:02:11. > :02:13.by ?4,000 in the first six years of this government.

:02:14. > :02:18.One in five NHS staff are forced to take a second job.

:02:19. > :02:22.Teachers are facing a further cut of ?3,000 in their salaries by 2020.

:02:23. > :02:25.Doesn't he think the Chancellor should just do the right

:02:26. > :02:31.Yet again the honourable gentleman is not giving the House the full

:02:32. > :02:36.picture of what is happening with public sector wages.

:02:37. > :02:40.Last year teachers' pay went up 3.3%.

:02:41. > :02:43.More than half of nurses and other NHS workers saw

:02:44. > :02:54.The armed services saw a pay rise of 2.4%.

:02:55. > :02:57.And the cleaner that he talked about was not employed

:02:58. > :02:59.by the public sector. They are employed by Serco.

:03:00. > :03:12.The government privatised their jobs.

:03:13. > :03:16.And I note, I note that the Chief Secretary did not refute the fact

:03:17. > :03:22.that the Chancellor said that the staff were overpaid.

:03:23. > :03:24.John McDonnell turned to the disparity

:03:25. > :03:28.between public and private sector pensions.

:03:29. > :03:30.Is she aware that the supposedly generous pensions across these

:03:31. > :03:32.professions pay on average the princely sum of

:03:33. > :03:38.And that low pay has lost many public sector workers to opt out

:03:39. > :03:49.11% of NHS staff have opted out of their pension scheme, a figure that,

:03:50. > :03:53.if it continues to rise will potentially undermine the whole

:03:54. > :03:56.scheme. Bobby Chief Secretary recognise the damage the Chancellor

:03:57. > :04:00.is causing and lift the pay cap so that public sector staff can have

:04:01. > :04:05.some hope of a fair wage settlement and a decent future pension? The

:04:06. > :04:10.onward gentleman hasn't acknowledged the truth of the figures that I have

:04:11. > :04:16.just talked about, the 3% rise for nurses over half of them, the

:04:17. > :04:22.teachers' rise of 3.3%. He simply won't look at the facts. The reality

:04:23. > :04:25.is that, at the moment, we have a situation where public sector

:04:26. > :04:29.workers are paid in line with the private sector, which is right, to

:04:30. > :04:34.allow the public sector and private sector to flourish, so be can create

:04:35. > :04:40.wealth in this country and, in addition, public sector workers have

:04:41. > :04:44.a 10% premium on their wages in pension contributions, and that is

:04:45. > :04:49.in the OBR report. The Treasury response today to the questions of

:04:50. > :04:54.the 1% pay cap are profoundly disappointing. This is the single

:04:55. > :04:58.biggest thing ensuring that inflation is eroding living

:04:59. > :05:02.standards. It is impoverishing workers and driving consumer debt.

:05:03. > :05:09.When will the Treasury at agree with the Foreign Secretary, that the time

:05:10. > :05:12.has come to end cap? I would point out to the honourable gentleman that

:05:13. > :05:18.in fact public sector workers like teachers have seen a 3% pay rise,

:05:19. > :05:23.nurses, many nurses get progression pay, those in the Armed Forces get

:05:24. > :05:27.an ex back to supplement which is worth 2.4% a year. And their

:05:28. > :05:30.salaries are in line with private sector salaries. What would be wrong

:05:31. > :05:33.is to have a significant differential between the public and

:05:34. > :05:38.private sectors, because we need businesses to thrive at the same

:05:39. > :05:40.tame as needing well funded public services.

:05:41. > :05:43.Parents in England could be missing out on government help

:05:44. > :05:50.with childcare costs because the application

:05:51. > :05:52.scheme is over-complicated and "full of holes",

:05:53. > :05:55.Latest figures show childcare costs are rising rapidly.

:05:56. > :06:02.A part-time nursery place for one pre-school child costs on average

:06:03. > :06:07.?6,000 a year, and in London the average

:06:08. > :06:10.Working parents who employ nannies face much higher costs.

:06:11. > :06:12.The Government scheme provides parents with, in effect,

:06:13. > :06:16.30 hours of free childcare a week from September.

:06:17. > :06:20.Parents whose applications are successful receive

:06:21. > :06:23.a 30 hours eligibility code to take to their provider

:06:24. > :06:26.As of today, over 145,000 codes have been generated

:06:27. > :06:31.Increasing numbers of parents are successfully applying.

:06:32. > :06:32.It's great news that so many families will

:06:33. > :06:41.Of course, as we seen from our early implementer and early roll-out

:06:42. > :06:45.areas, this support can make a real positive

:06:46. > :06:51.Let's face it, as some may be reading in their end of year report

:06:52. > :06:53.due this week, good effort, but just not good enough.

:06:54. > :06:55.The process for applying for free childcare is

:06:56. > :06:59.confusing for both parents and nurseries.

:07:00. > :07:01.As members in this House will attest, setting up

:07:02. > :07:03.two-factor authentication on our phones was difficult

:07:04. > :07:06.enough and we have a well resourced IT department.

:07:07. > :07:09.Who is helping the parents at home who are

:07:10. > :07:11.juggling this with jobs and caring for their young children?

:07:12. > :07:16.As a result, parents haven't been able to

:07:17. > :07:19.open accounts to pay for the nursery care or preschool and even some

:07:20. > :07:24.providers, particularly in the voluntary sector, cannot register.

:07:25. > :07:28.What a shame it is that when we could be weeks away from a great

:07:29. > :07:31.breakthrough for providers, parents and most importantly children,

:07:32. > :07:34.we are instead discussing a policy that is riddled with holes.

:07:35. > :07:37.And, my word, are there are questions to answer?

:07:38. > :07:41.Just yesterday the Minister's colleagues in the Treasury admitted

:07:42. > :07:45.in response to one of my written questions that it is not possible

:07:46. > :07:47.to provide a definitive number of applications not completed

:07:48. > :07:53.Could the Minister give us his estimate of just how

:07:54. > :07:57.many parents suffered these technical issues?

:07:58. > :08:02.What steps are being put in place to fix

:08:03. > :08:05.the system, and what guarantees can he make to parents that,

:08:06. > :08:08.as the August deadline approaches, the system will work for them?

:08:09. > :08:11.I have to say, she is very much a glass half full person.

:08:12. > :08:15.Yesterday morning, I was in the city of York meeting with

:08:16. > :08:17.providers and parents who were benefiting,

:08:18. > :08:22.I heard from people who said, this is a great offer.

:08:23. > :08:25.It means that no longer do I have to pass my

:08:26. > :08:29.husband in the hallway as I go out to my evening job as he comes in

:08:30. > :08:32.We have ironed out the glitches in the software.

:08:33. > :08:47.People are registering. We are on track for 200,000.

:08:48. > :08:49.Given the amount of my time that was taken

:08:50. > :08:51.and the amount of time that my

:08:52. > :08:53.constituent had to give up, and indeed the technical support people

:08:54. > :08:56.from his department, all as a consequence of the fact

:08:57. > :08:58.that she had an apostrophe in her name, can he

:08:59. > :09:01.speculate as to why on earth we weren't told that there

:09:02. > :09:04.Certainly, I have made that clear, today.

:09:05. > :09:09.There have been a number of outages, some of which were to fix

:09:10. > :09:11.some of the issues that my Right Honourable Friend

:09:12. > :09:16.recent one was due to a power supply issue

:09:17. > :09:21.That has now been fixed and the system is up

:09:22. > :09:35.MPs will hold an emergency debate on proposals to increase tuition fees

:09:36. > :09:38.in England. The Speaker, John Bercow, agree to a request from the

:09:39. > :09:41.Shadow Education Secretary Angela Rayner. The three-hour debate will

:09:42. > :09:47.take place after Prime Minister's Questions. Angela Rayner said time

:09:48. > :09:50.had been set aside on the 18th of April. But then, Mr Speaker, the

:09:51. > :09:55.Prime Minister announced her plans to go to the country in an early

:09:56. > :10:01.general election. That meant the debate was cancelled. Audley, Mr

:10:02. > :10:05.Speaker, they have been determined not to grant the House about since

:10:06. > :10:11.that election, and it was the First Secretary of State who called only

:10:12. > :10:16.two weeks ago for a national debate on tuition fees and student debt,

:10:17. > :10:19.but apparently that national debate will not include this House. Both

:10:20. > :10:23.universities and thousands of students across the country are now

:10:24. > :10:29.uncertain about the rate of tuition fees that can be charged with

:10:30. > :10:35.neither government or opposition time being provided, we have no

:10:36. > :10:41.choice but to use standing order 24. So, Mr Speaker, 109 days since it

:10:42. > :10:44.was first promised by ministers, I ask leave the House for an emergency

:10:45. > :10:50.debate on their plans to raise tuition fees. The Speaker accented

:10:51. > :10:56.that argument. I have listened carefully to the application from

:10:57. > :10:59.the honourable member. I am satisfied that the matter raised by

:11:00. > :11:06.the honourable member is proper to be discussed under standing order

:11:07. > :11:14.number 24. As the honourable member the leave of the House? -- has the

:11:15. > :11:21.honourable member. The honourable member has obtained believe of the

:11:22. > :11:25.House. MPs on the opposition side showing their support for Angela

:11:26. > :11:29.Rayner's motion for an emergency debate, but a second motion from Lib

:11:30. > :11:36.Dem leader Tim Farron was unsuccessful. He wanted MPs to

:11:37. > :11:39.discuss unaccompanied child refugees. He explained why. I feel

:11:40. > :11:43.strongly that this issue must be debated before the House rises for

:11:44. > :11:47.the summer recess. The summer months mean that more troops are being made

:11:48. > :11:53.to Europe by migrants on unsuitable votes and I feel that all over again

:11:54. > :11:57.we are likely to see an increase in the news about people drowning,

:11:58. > :12:01.attempting desperately to reach safety. Put bluntly, by the time

:12:02. > :12:06.October comes around there will be many more children alone and sadly

:12:07. > :12:10.orphaned lending a hand to mouth existence in continental Europe. We

:12:11. > :12:14.must examine our consciences. The government made an unambitious

:12:15. > :12:17.commitment that had to be dragged out of it, it then cancelled that

:12:18. > :12:23.agreement before even managing to meet half of those terms. I ask this

:12:24. > :12:28.House to take the opportunity to address this outrage and to help

:12:29. > :12:33.those desperate children. The right onward gentleman asks leave to grant

:12:34. > :12:37.the debate on a specific and important matter that should have

:12:38. > :12:39.important consideration, namely accepting unaccompanied child

:12:40. > :12:44.refugees into the UK. I have listened carefully to the

:12:45. > :12:47.application and I am not persuaded that this matter is proper to be

:12:48. > :12:52.discussed under standing order number 24. John Bercow said that it

:12:53. > :12:56.was open to Tim Farron to raise the issue in other ways, saying that he

:12:57. > :12:57.could ask an urgent question and bring the matter to the Chamber,

:12:58. > :12:59.that way. You're watching Tuesday

:13:00. > :13:01.in Parliament with me, Photographers and film-makers

:13:02. > :13:05.love them, but, to many in the airline

:13:06. > :13:08.industry, they are a modern menace. Airborne drones can have all sort

:13:09. > :13:10.of uses, but there is increasing concern about their potential

:13:11. > :13:16.danger to aircraft. There was disruption at

:13:17. > :13:18.Gatwick Airport earlier this summer when a drone was spotted

:13:19. > :13:22.flying too close. It led to a runway being closed

:13:23. > :13:26.and five flights being diverted. The incident prompted

:13:27. > :13:29.a Conservative MP to call a debate in Westminster Hall,

:13:30. > :13:32.although he stressed There has been enormous growth

:13:33. > :13:36.in the ownership of drones. 530,000, so I understand,

:13:37. > :13:40.were bought in 2014 alone, and of course the vast majority

:13:41. > :13:43.are for leisure use. When used responsibly,

:13:44. > :13:46.they're a great asset. They encourage interest

:13:47. > :13:49.in aviation and aerodynamics, But there is also responsible

:13:50. > :13:53.or downright dangerous use, which poses a risk to

:13:54. > :13:56.aircraft and passengers. The key is to have regulation

:13:57. > :14:00.and enforcement which protects what is becoming an important

:14:01. > :14:06.sector of the economy. Laws are already in place

:14:07. > :14:09.governing the use of drones. They must not put people

:14:10. > :14:12.or property in danger, and the person controlling one must

:14:13. > :14:16.be able to see it at all times. Jeremy Lefroy suggested

:14:17. > :14:19.an additional rule - compulsory registration

:14:20. > :14:23.so that owners could be traced. There is a story -

:14:24. > :14:26.perhaps apocryphal, perhaps not - that quite recently a drone

:14:27. > :14:31.was flown into the Shard in London, and the only way people found

:14:32. > :14:34.out who owned the drone was when the owner went

:14:35. > :14:36.to try to retrieve it which sounds to me a slight

:14:37. > :14:41.example of chutzpah. The minister said it was an emerging

:14:42. > :14:43.technology with potential benefits. It is a growing market and offers

:14:44. > :14:49.the UK opportunities, An example of positive ways

:14:50. > :14:54.in which drones could be used was well illustrated when,

:14:55. > :15:01.as many here will know, the firefighters at Grenfell Tower

:15:02. > :15:04.used drones after the incident to inspect some of the top floors,

:15:05. > :15:08.when these were deemed too unsafe Shakespeare said in Henry V, all

:15:09. > :15:19.things are ready if our mind be so, and our mind is ready

:15:20. > :15:26.to take further action. And Tennyson, the great

:15:27. > :15:31.Lincolnshire poet, said, dream not that the hour

:15:32. > :15:36.that was will last, and by that he meant

:15:37. > :15:38.that there is a period of time when you need to act,

:15:39. > :15:41.you shouldn't dream that this So, notwithstanding my sunny

:15:42. > :15:52.disposition, my eternal summer, it is important that we do act

:15:53. > :15:59.swiftly, proportionately, Last week the Government set

:16:00. > :16:07.out its strategy on drugs, specifically targeting psychoactive

:16:08. > :16:13.substances to cut illicit drug use. Fewer than a tenth of adults

:16:14. > :16:16.in England and Wales now take drugs, according to the Home Office,

:16:17. > :16:19.but drug-related deaths In the Commons, MPs held

:16:20. > :16:24.a general debate on the issue. One of the most pressing questions

:16:25. > :16:29.was decriminalisation. I do very much accept that there

:16:30. > :16:32.are some members of this house, and some people in our country,

:16:33. > :16:35.that think what we should be doing because we are evidence-based

:16:36. > :16:43.policy makers. All the evidence shows

:16:44. > :16:47.of the awful harms of the drugs that we ban and restrict,

:16:48. > :16:52.and it's our job, it's our primary job to keep people safe,

:16:53. > :16:57.and the way to keep people safe is to prevent them from taking

:16:58. > :17:02.drugs in the first place. I note the point about

:17:03. > :17:07."evidence-based", but it's clear on the evidence that the most

:17:08. > :17:10.dangerous drug in terms of harm is alcohol, so could she explain

:17:11. > :17:14.the different approach that the Government

:17:15. > :17:16.takes to alcohol, the most dangerous drug,

:17:17. > :17:19.and, for example, cannabis? I wouldn't agree with the honourable

:17:20. > :17:26.gentleman that, you know, If you look at the substances

:17:27. > :17:34.which we are restricting... Of course, there are those people

:17:35. > :17:40.who take alcohol to such a harmful degree that it is devastating

:17:41. > :17:43.for them, and it is devastating to their family members

:17:44. > :17:46.and to the wider community. as we do in the Modern Crime

:17:47. > :17:51.Prevention Strategy, that misuse of alcohol does have

:17:52. > :17:56.very dramatically harmful effects, but, actually, alcohol taken

:17:57. > :18:05.in moderation is not a harmful drug. The Government's recognition

:18:06. > :18:06.of evidence-based treatment in recovery and harm reduction

:18:07. > :18:09.is welcome, but what stakeholders want to know, and what families

:18:10. > :18:14.and communities suffering from drug abuse up and down the country want

:18:15. > :18:18.to know, is whether this strategy isn't just old methods

:18:19. > :18:23.in a shinier package. We frequently use the term "war

:18:24. > :18:27.on drugs", so I ask the minister, how exactly do we expect to win

:18:28. > :18:33.a war with reduced forces We desperately need a new approach,

:18:34. > :18:40.a completely different strategy, and whilst I welcome the emphasis

:18:41. > :18:44.that the Government strategy puts on improving treatment

:18:45. > :18:46.and recovery for users, the strategy rehearses

:18:47. > :18:49.the same failed arguments for prohibition and criminalisation

:18:50. > :18:53.which have patently failed. The measure of that failure is

:18:54. > :18:56.spelt out in the strategy itself, which tells us that in England

:18:57. > :19:00.and Wales the number of deaths from drug misuse registered in 2015

:19:01. > :19:06.increased by 10.3% to 2,479, and this follows an increase

:19:07. > :19:09.of 14.9% in the previous year In 1971, we had fewer

:19:10. > :19:19.than 1,000 addicts to heroin and cocaine in this country,

:19:20. > :19:23.and virtually no deaths, because they were receiving their

:19:24. > :19:27.heroin from the Health Service. After 46 years of the harshest

:19:28. > :19:33.prohibition in Europe, Isn't it true that prohibition

:19:34. > :19:41.creates the drug take, creates the gangsters

:19:42. > :19:47.and creates the deaths? I'm extremely grateful

:19:48. > :19:49.to the honourable gentleman. I know that he has a long history

:19:50. > :19:53.of campaigning on this subject, which I respect, but I'm afraid

:19:54. > :19:57.I must disagree with him, because a lot...a very great deal

:19:58. > :20:02.has changed since 1971. We have criminal gangs

:20:03. > :20:08.from all over the world coming to the United Kingdom

:20:09. > :20:11.because we have a high population, and we are much more densely

:20:12. > :20:15.populated than other countries, and they come to this

:20:16. > :20:18.country to sell drugs. I am sure there are colleagues

:20:19. > :20:23.that would like, sometimes, to turn the clock back to 1971 -

:20:24. > :20:27.I don't think we can. The former barrister

:20:28. > :20:30.Victoria Atkins. Over in the Lords, the Government's

:20:31. > :20:33.been urged to use the depth of the UK's relationship

:20:34. > :20:36.with Saudi Arabia to do more than just condemn the country

:20:37. > :20:41.over its use of the death penalty. Ministers say they're seeking

:20:42. > :20:44.clarity over reports that 14 men, including two juveniles,

:20:45. > :20:46.could be facing execution for attending protests in eastern

:20:47. > :20:53.Saudi Arabia in 2012. My Lords, we have a close

:20:54. > :20:55.relationship with Saudi Arabia. Could the minister now

:20:56. > :20:58.explain what they are doing We have a precedence in the past,

:20:59. > :21:05.when David Cameron, as Prime Minister, personally

:21:06. > :21:10.intervened to stop the execution The Minister said the Government

:21:11. > :21:15.was urgently seeking clarification over the situation from

:21:16. > :21:16.the Saudi leadership, The week the Foreign Secretary

:21:17. > :21:24.visited Saudi Arabia, eight people were executed

:21:25. > :21:28.on one day - beheaded. Now, when will this Government

:21:29. > :21:33.actually decide that it's time to publicly condemn these abuses

:21:34. > :21:38.of human rights? It is known domestically

:21:39. > :21:45.within the United Kingdom. We do exhort Saudi Arabia to

:21:46. > :21:54.have respect for human rights. The threat to stability

:21:55. > :21:56.is extremism. The ultimate battle

:21:57. > :22:03.against extremism is one How can this sordid,

:22:04. > :22:12.uncivilised behaviour possibly help The minister said it was

:22:13. > :22:18.a question of balance - the UK condemned human rights abuses

:22:19. > :22:22.and the use of the death penalty, but there were other areas

:22:23. > :22:26.where it was better to have a dialogue, and she had backing

:22:27. > :22:29.from a Conservative colleague. Should we not just have a thought

:22:30. > :22:32.to what the implosion of Saudi Arabia would mean to

:22:33. > :22:37.world peace and stability? We only have to take

:22:38. > :22:40.the example of Syria and Iraq I thank my noble friend, I think,

:22:41. > :22:48.for a very helpful observation, because it is indeed the case that

:22:49. > :22:52.Saudi Arabia is in a position to influence, is in a position

:22:53. > :22:58.to assist with stability in the Gulf area, and is in a position to help

:22:59. > :23:01.in the fight against Daesh. Surely the depth of our relationship

:23:02. > :23:06.with Saudi Arabia in trade, in finance, in the presence of many

:23:07. > :23:10.Saudi Arabians in this country, the long-standing way

:23:11. > :23:14.in which we have been together through war and peace, would

:23:15. > :23:17.indicate that we have the options for significantly more leveraged

:23:18. > :23:21.than mere condemnation. And I wonder what other measures

:23:22. > :23:24.the Government is taking which involve action

:23:25. > :23:28.as well as condemnation, At the end of the day,

:23:29. > :23:33.Saudi Arabia is a sovereign state, and it is not possible for us

:23:34. > :23:37.to interfere either with its judicial system

:23:38. > :23:38.or its constitutional approach our profound disapproval

:23:39. > :23:45.and our profound opposition to abuses of human rights

:23:46. > :23:52.and deployment of the death penalty. Finally, the 2017 intake of MPs

:23:53. > :23:56.are continuing to make their first The new MP for Slough said he felt

:23:57. > :24:03.the weight of expectation on his shoulders as the first

:24:04. > :24:09.turban-wearing Sikh in the Commons. Slough, Mr Speaker,

:24:10. > :24:12.is a town of firsts. It elected the UK's

:24:13. > :24:18.first-ever black lady mayor, and now, more than three decades

:24:19. > :24:21.later, it has elected the first-ever turbaned Sikh in

:24:22. > :24:25.the British Parliament. Indeed, I believe the first-ever

:24:26. > :24:32.to any European Parliament. A glass ceiling has truly been

:24:33. > :24:38.broken, and I sincerely hope that many more like me will follow

:24:39. > :24:44.in the years and decades to come. I was most overwhelmed

:24:45. > :24:47.during a recent trip up north, when an elderly gentleman walked up

:24:48. > :24:52.to me with tears streaming down his eyes and said, I'm proud,

:24:53. > :24:59.son, because I didn't think that But, he said, being distinctive

:25:00. > :25:06.could have advantages. I for one, Mr Speaker,

:25:07. > :25:10.and very much hoping that these brightly-coloured turbans

:25:11. > :25:15.will act as a magnet, as you repeatedly point

:25:16. > :25:17.towards the member for Slough to make his invaluable contribution

:25:18. > :25:24.to proceedings in this House. The new MP for Slough

:25:25. > :25:26.making his first speech Do join me at the same time

:25:27. > :25:32.tomorrow, when, among other things, we'll have highlights from

:25:33. > :25:37.the last Prime Minister's Questions But, for now, from me,

:25:38. > :25:44.Alicia McCarthy, goodbye.