:00:17. > :00:19.Hello and welcome to Wednesday in Parliament.
:00:20. > :00:22.The Commons spends the day debating a call for parliament to be given
:00:23. > :00:28.a greater role in the UK's departure from the European Union.
:00:29. > :00:30.Westminster's major parties are asked what they're doing
:00:31. > :00:36.And calls for tougher prison sentences for stalkers.
:00:37. > :00:39.Despite it being such a violating and intrusive crime, despitd it
:00:40. > :00:42.having the capacity to do stch significant physical
:00:43. > :00:46.and mental harm, it's still being treated as a minor offence.
:00:47. > :00:48.But first, how far should Parliament have a sax
:00:49. > :00:53.on the UK's negotiations about leaving the EU?
:00:54. > :00:55.That was the question of the day at Westminster,
:00:56. > :00:57.where Labour had put forward a motion calling for a debate
:00:58. > :01:00.on the Government's plans and a chance to fully scruthnise
:01:01. > :01:05.them before triggering Article 0, the legal process allowing
:01:06. > :01:11.The Government accepted that in principle but added an alendment
:01:12. > :01:16.saying any such scrutiny shouldn't undermine its negotiating stance.
:01:17. > :01:18.Well, just before MPs got their teeth into the
:01:19. > :01:21.rights and wrongs of all of that, there was the small
:01:22. > :01:24.matter of Prime Minister's Questions to get through,
:01:25. > :01:27.where Jeremy Corbyn painted a gloomy picture of what had happened
:01:28. > :01:36.The reality is that since the Brexit vote, the trade deficit is widening,
:01:37. > :01:37.growth forecasts have been downgraded,
:01:38. > :01:41.value of the pound down 16%, an alliance of the Chamber
:01:42. > :01:43.of Commerce, Confederation of British industry, British Retail
:01:44. > :01:48.Consortium and Trades Union Congress have all made representation
:01:49. > :01:50.to the Prime Minister, demanding clarity.
:01:51. > :01:54.Is the Prime Minister reallx willing to risk a shambolic Tory Brdxit
:01:55. > :02:00.just to appease the people behind her?
:02:01. > :02:03.What the Conservative Party committed to in its manifesto
:02:04. > :02:06.was to give the British people a referendum on whether to stay
:02:07. > :02:10.We gave the British people that vote,
:02:11. > :02:14.We will be leaving the European Union and in doing
:02:15. > :02:17.that, we will negotiate the right deal for the UK which means the
:02:18. > :02:21.right deal in terms of oper`ting within and trading
:02:22. > :02:26.That's what matters to companies here in the UK and
:02:27. > :02:29.that's what we're going to be ambitious about delivering.
:02:30. > :02:32.We on these benches do respdct the decision of the British people
:02:33. > :02:39.But this is a Government th`t drew up no plans for Brexit, that now
:02:40. > :02:43.has no strategy for negotiating Brexit and offers no claritx,
:02:44. > :02:48.no transparency and no chance of scrutiny of the process
:02:49. > :02:54.The jobs and incomes of millions of our people are at stake.
:02:55. > :02:58.Business is worrying and the Government has no answers.
:02:59. > :03:01.The Prime Minister says she won't give a running colmentary,
:03:02. > :03:05.but isn't it time the Government stopped running away
:03:06. > :03:07.from the looming threat to jobs and businesses in this
:03:08. > :03:11.country and the living standards of millions of people?
:03:12. > :03:14.Unlike the Right Honourable gentleman, I'm optimistic
:03:15. > :03:18.about the prospects of this country once we leave the European Tnion.
:03:19. > :03:21.I'm optimistic about the tr`de deals that other countries now actively
:03:22. > :03:24.are coming to us to say that they want to do
:03:25. > :03:28.with the United Kingdom, and I'm optimistic about how we will
:03:29. > :03:31.be able to ensure that our dconomy grows outside of the Europe`n Union.
:03:32. > :03:34.But I have to say to the Right Honourable
:03:35. > :03:35.gentleman on this issue, Labour didn't want
:03:36. > :03:39.We gave them, the Conservathves gave them a referendum.
:03:40. > :03:43.We are listening to the British people and delivering on
:03:44. > :03:47.that result and now the Shadow Foreign Secretary is shouting
:03:48. > :03:55.The Shadow Foreign Secretarx wants a second vote.
:03:56. > :03:58.I have to say to her, I would have thought that L`bour MPs
:03:59. > :04:03.You can ask the same question again,
:04:04. > :04:06.you still get the answer yot don't want.
:04:07. > :04:14.The Prime Minister appears to have made a choice and that
:04:15. > :04:18.choice is to side with the protectionists and nationalhsts
:04:19. > :04:21.who have taken over her party as surely...
:04:22. > :04:27.As surely as Momentum have taken over the Labour Party.
:04:28. > :04:35.She has chosen a hard Brexit that was never on anybody's
:04:36. > :04:39.ballot paper and she has chosen to turn her back on British
:04:40. > :04:49.As a result, petrol prices `nd food retailers warn of huge pricd rises
:04:50. > :04:54.at the pumps and on the supdrmarket shelves in the coming days, so
:04:55. > :04:58.when will she put the interdsts of hard-working British people ahead
:04:59. > :05:06.of an extremist protectionism that absolutely nobody voted for?
:05:07. > :05:08.The Right Honourable gentlelan asks about who we are siding with.
:05:09. > :05:11.I'll tell him who this Government is siding with.
:05:12. > :05:15.We are siding with the Brithsh people who voted...
:05:16. > :05:18.Who voted to leave the European Union
:05:19. > :05:20.and it's high time the right honourable gentlelan
:05:21. > :05:22.listened to the vote of the British people
:05:23. > :05:25.and accepted that's exactly what we're going to do.
:05:26. > :05:30.Many people across the Housd will be reassured that the Government
:05:31. > :05:36.accepted the amendment to the opposition motion being debated
:05:37. > :05:39.later this afternoon, which guarantees that this House hs able
:05:40. > :05:44.properly to scrutinise the plan for leaving the European Unhon
:05:45. > :05:52.Can she tell us, will that scrutiny involve a vote?
:05:53. > :05:55.I have to say to the right honourable lady that the idda
:05:56. > :05:59.that Parliament somehow wasn't going to be able to discuss, debate,
:06:00. > :06:16.First of all, the Secretary of State
:06:17. > :06:18.for exiting the European Unhon has already made two statemdnts
:06:19. > :06:22.I believe four hours of questions followed those.
:06:23. > :06:26.A new select committee has been set up which crucially includes
:06:27. > :06:30.representatives from all parts of the United Kingdom which will be
:06:31. > :06:36.over a week ago, I announce that there will be a Great Repeal Bill
:06:37. > :06:38.in the next session of Parliament to repeal
:06:39. > :06:40.the European Communities Act, so Parliament is going to h`ve
:06:41. > :06:43.every opportunity to debate this issue.
:06:44. > :06:47.And so on to the day's Brexit debate.
:06:48. > :06:51.Labour set the tone in advance, publishing 170 questions
:06:52. > :06:55.it was putting to the Prime Minister about the negotiating terms -
:06:56. > :06:59.170 being the number of days until the 31st of March,
:07:00. > :07:03.by when Government aims to have triggered Article 50.
:07:04. > :07:06.Labour's Sir Keir Starmer, who's the Shadow Brexit Secretary,
:07:07. > :07:10.said the negotiations were hugely significant.
:07:11. > :07:13.Decisions that are going to be taken by the Government over the next few
:07:14. > :07:18.months and years in relation to exiting the EU are going to have a
:07:19. > :07:23.profound implication for thd future of this country, for its economy,
:07:24. > :07:27.for its people and for its place in the world.
:07:28. > :07:29.Does he believe the national interest will be best served
:07:30. > :07:33.by the Government coming to this place and explaining in precise
:07:34. > :07:37.before we've even walked into the room?
:07:38. > :07:40.Of course there is a degree of detail that can't be gond into.
:07:41. > :07:43.Of course there is a degree of flexibility that has to be
:07:44. > :07:46.Of course the starting position may not be
:07:47. > :07:51.But the question here is whether the basic terms
:07:52. > :07:55.The honourable gentleman, because I am very much
:07:56. > :07:59.minded to support his motion, is calling for a vote on the tdrms
:08:00. > :08:03.not just an examination, but a vote on the terms before we send
:08:04. > :08:16.But I do take it in two stages, because both of them are important.
:08:17. > :08:27.Scrutiny, putting the plans before the House really matters.
:08:28. > :08:30.There is a separate argument about a vote and I say
:08:31. > :08:33.there should be a vote, but what we mustn't do is gdt
:08:34. > :08:35.to a situation where in orddr to resist the vote,
:08:36. > :08:38.the Secretary of State won't even put the plans before the Hotse.
:08:39. > :08:41.There has been a vote of the British people,
:08:42. > :08:42.a vote that was delegated to the British...
:08:43. > :08:47.A vote that was delegated to the British people by
:08:48. > :08:50.the terms of the referendum act and the question he's got to answer,
:08:51. > :08:53.supposing there was a vote hn this House, how would he vote?
:08:54. > :08:56.Would he vote against Article 50 invocation
:08:57. > :09:07.I'm not going to take long responding to that,
:09:08. > :09:10.because I've made the point, the mandate on the
:09:11. > :09:13.23rd of June was not a mandate as the terms.
:09:14. > :09:15.I can't put it any clearer than that.
:09:16. > :09:18.The Brexit Secretary argued there would be plenty of ch`nces
:09:19. > :09:21.for MPs to scrutinise the Government's plans.
:09:22. > :09:25.We have already got plans - the House, not the Government -
:09:26. > :09:28.has got plans to put in place the so-called Brexht select
:09:29. > :09:31.committee which will take effect next month and we will be appearing
:09:32. > :09:35.It would be rather surprising to appear in front of
:09:36. > :09:38.that select committee and not be talking about some of our plans
:09:39. > :09:41.I expect to attend the commhttee regularly just as I will also attend
:09:42. > :09:46.the Lords committee, its effective equivalent.
:09:47. > :09:48.So we don't shy from scrutiny, we welcome it.
:09:49. > :09:50.But the Government wouldn't reveal everything.
:09:51. > :09:53.If you went to buy a house and you only
:09:54. > :09:56.looked at one house, you told the person you werd in love
:09:57. > :09:58.with their house and you made a bid for it,
:09:59. > :10:00.I suspect the price would go up and...
:10:01. > :10:11.If you make pre-emptive indications that you are willing
:10:12. > :10:14.to make a concession on somdthing, you actually reduce the valte
:10:15. > :10:19.of that concession, so in m`ny, many ways, we cannot give ddtails
:10:20. > :10:23.about how we are going to run the negotiation.
:10:24. > :10:26.We still have got no offer of a vote and we need some clarity
:10:27. > :10:29.about the policy the Government's going to pursud
:10:30. > :10:33.because the Government is accountable to this House
:10:34. > :10:36.for the policy choosing negotiations.
:10:37. > :10:41.This is about the country and whether Brexit works
:10:42. > :10:45.When I used to stand behind that dispatch box,
:10:46. > :10:48.the honourable member for Stone and many of his other fervent
:10:49. > :10:52.Brexiteers, I could always rely on them to marry their loathing
:10:53. > :10:55.of the European Union to their passion for the traditions
:10:56. > :11:02.They hated Brussels as much as they loved the House of Commons.
:11:03. > :11:05.They still hate Brussels, but they now appear to
:11:06. > :11:10.have been completely tongue tied, completely mute, silent when they
:11:11. > :11:12.have an opportunity to speak up for the traditional
:11:13. > :11:18.What the Government does is introduces its policy.
:11:19. > :11:21.It introduces its legislation to get that policy
:11:22. > :11:24.through and it has been cle`r responsibility for the negotiation
:11:25. > :11:31.Against that, no Government can exist unless it has
:11:32. > :11:36.At any day, if the Leader of the Opposition
:11:37. > :11:38.chooses to put down a vote of no-confidence in Her Majdsty s
:11:39. > :11:41.Government, Mr Speaker, as I understand it, you will take
:11:42. > :11:47.And therefore, if there is any part of the negotiathon,
:11:48. > :11:50.if there is any part of the discussion that takes place
:11:51. > :11:53.that this House presents or opposes, then the Government may be removed
:11:54. > :12:06.the first since Jeremy Corbxn was overwhelmingly re-electdd
:12:07. > :12:09.as Labour leader and the first since the break
:12:10. > :12:14.Jeremy Corbyn turned to a controversial announcelent
:12:15. > :12:16.from the Home Secretary Ambdr Rudd, who's department had briefed
:12:17. > :12:18.proposals for firms to disclose what percentage of their
:12:19. > :12:24.It had argued it was a way to encourage companies to hhre more
:12:25. > :12:30.local people and "flush out" those abusing existing rules.
:12:31. > :12:32.Jeremy Corbyn attacked the hdea suggesting it was at odds
:12:33. > :12:41.with Theresa May's stated ambitions for the UK.
:12:42. > :12:43.At the Conservative Party conference, the Prime Minister said
:12:44. > :12:46.she wants Britain to be a country where it doesn't matter
:12:47. > :12:50.But the Home Secretary's fl`gship announcement was to name and shame
:12:51. > :12:54.companies that employ foreign workers.
:12:55. > :12:57.Could the Prime Minister explain why where someone was born
:12:58. > :13:01.clearly does matter to members of her Cabinet?
:13:02. > :13:03.First of all, can I say to the right Honourable gentlelan,
:13:04. > :13:06.congratulations on winning the Labour leadership electhon?
:13:07. > :13:25.Can I welcome him back to his place in this House
:13:26. > :13:30.Can I say to him that the policy that he has just
:13:31. > :13:33.described was never the polhcy that the Home Secretary announced.
:13:34. > :13:35.There was no naming and shaling no published list
:13:36. > :13:39.of foreign workers, no published data.
:13:40. > :13:44.what we are going to consult on is...
:13:45. > :13:47...is whether we should bring ourselves in line
:13:48. > :13:50.with countries like the United States of America which collect
:13:51. > :13:52.data in order to be able to ensure that they're getting
:13:53. > :14:00.the right skills training for workers in economy.
:14:01. > :14:06.We heard her party is registering foreigners working in the UK. The
:14:07. > :14:11.crackdown and rhetoric against foreigners by this government has
:14:12. > :14:19.even led to you kept saying things have gone too far. Across the length
:14:20. > :14:22.and breadth of this land people are totally disgusted by the xenophobic
:14:23. > :14:29.language on display from her government. Will she now confirmed
:14:30. > :14:33.to this House that the intention of the Government is still to go ahead
:14:34. > :14:37.with the registration of foreign workers but apparently we should not
:14:38. > :14:45.worry because it will be kept secret by her government? Can I sax very
:14:46. > :14:48.gently to the gentleman that I answered two questions on that
:14:49. > :14:54.earlier and I suggest he should have listened to the answer I gave there.
:14:55. > :14:56.You're watching Wednesday in Parliament, with me,
:14:57. > :15:00.Four of the main parties at Westminster have been ch`llenged
:15:01. > :15:03.on what they are doing to increase the number of women in Parlhament.
:15:04. > :15:06.Of the 650 MPs, under a third - a total of 197 - are women.
:15:07. > :15:08.Labour has the best record with women,
:15:09. > :15:14.making up 43% of the parliamentary party.
:15:15. > :15:17.Meanwhile, 32% of SNP MPs are women, while the figure
:15:18. > :15:27.Of the eight Liberal Democr`t MPs, all are men.
:15:28. > :15:34.It seems slightly odd to have four white men are sitting in front of
:15:35. > :15:41.you giving evidence... With respect, that is your fault, not ours! I am
:15:42. > :15:46.very proud to be leader of the Labour Party and present our views
:15:47. > :15:51.on it. We have 43% of Labour MPs who are women. I would like it to be
:15:52. > :15:53.more and our aspiration is to gain at least 50% of women MPs in
:15:54. > :15:53.Parliament. all-women shortlists had made
:15:54. > :16:03.an incredible difference. It was very controversial when first
:16:04. > :16:09.promoted in the party in thd early 1970s. I was accused of being a far
:16:10. > :16:11.left extremist for promoting ideas like that. Can you imagine such a
:16:12. > :16:12.thing? to reports of bullying
:16:13. > :16:22.inside the Labour party. What assurances will you give to all
:16:23. > :16:26.of your members right now that your party will do more to end the
:16:27. > :16:32.intimidation currently taking place in your party? You are assuling the
:16:33. > :16:35.party is riddled with intimhdation. It is not. There is some
:16:36. > :16:41.intimidation which goes on. I am dealing with it. We have codes of
:16:42. > :16:46.conduct, rules, processes, `nd it has been dealt with. We are also a
:16:47. > :16:52.very large party with well over half a million members and growing fast.
:16:53. > :16:57.I want to make sure those ndw members all understand the rules,
:16:58. > :17:01.understand the code of condtct, understand the behaviour expected
:17:02. > :17:07.from them within the party. One last question, Jeremy, which is this ..
:17:08. > :17:10.Why do you think a woman dohng the job that I do as a member of
:17:11. > :17:17.Parliament is far more likely to receive abuse for doing it than me?
:17:18. > :17:22.The society in which we livd in is unfortunately still quite sdxist and
:17:23. > :17:26.in many cases quite misogynhst. Read the style of writing of a lot of
:17:27. > :17:28.popular newspapers that I al sure you do not and you will beghn to see
:17:29. > :17:31.where a lot of this comes from. why her party had not
:17:32. > :17:41.introduced all-women shortlhsts If you were pushed out the prime
:17:42. > :17:43.minister came to you and sahd, how are we going to get more
:17:44. > :17:51.conservative women MPs in Parliament, would you say all women
:17:52. > :17:57.short lists are the way to go? I think imposing VAT on the
:17:58. > :18:00.Conservative Association wotld possibly risk a resentment which
:18:01. > :18:13.would not help a member of Parliament. -- imposing VAT. --
:18:14. > :18:16.imposing this. What about the evidence of good positive
:18:17. > :18:19.discrimination? We can see hn this room some of us are here because we
:18:20. > :18:24.were on all women short lists and that is why we have got better
:18:25. > :18:31.representation. I am just worried that you are going, no, we don't
:18:32. > :18:34.want to do that. If I may s`y so, we have made progress. We want to make
:18:35. > :18:39.more progress. I think the progress that was made in the last tdn years
:18:40. > :18:43.has been with measures which we have taken which have been acceptable in
:18:44. > :18:47.the Conservative party. The Conservative party have onlx ever
:18:48. > :18:53.managed to get 123 women eldcted and we have thousands of women who are
:18:54. > :18:57.members. I hear warm words from you but how are you going to convince
:18:58. > :19:05.this committee that these w`rm words will lead to more women at the next
:19:06. > :19:10.election rather than a statts quo? Judge as by our actions and what has
:19:11. > :19:15.happened in the last few ye`rs. The thing that I would say is that we
:19:16. > :19:17.have made lots of progress `nd we are going to continue to do that.
:19:18. > :19:32.We have gone on a journey which has seen as implement mechanisms leading
:19:33. > :19:36.to significant change. The SNP is a very democratic political p`rty It
:19:37. > :19:39.does not happen because of the will of one person but there are people
:19:40. > :19:42.throughout the party, parliamentarians and members who
:19:43. > :19:44.have brought about that change and we are still in a process.
:19:45. > :19:47.that his party's record was "lamentable" but was
:19:48. > :19:52.looking at ways to improve the selection process.
:19:53. > :19:59.There are people in every p`rty who are out and out dinosaurs btt some
:20:00. > :20:04.who also consider themselves to be liberal, progressive, open-linded
:20:05. > :20:07.and tolerant but nonetheless bias they did not recognise in
:20:08. > :20:09.themselves. We all need to be trained to understand.
:20:10. > :20:12.was to avoid interference but he believed in what he called
:20:13. > :20:17."muscular liberalism" which meant making things happen.
:20:18. > :20:20.The courts in England and W`les must be given the power to imposd much
:20:21. > :20:25.That was the demand of a Conservative MP,
:20:26. > :20:27.Alex Chalk, who has introduced legislation to raise the maximum
:20:28. > :20:35.Stalking is a horrible and violating crime.
:20:36. > :20:38.It rips relationships apart, destroys
:20:39. > :20:42.careers and can cause lasting mental harm.
:20:43. > :20:45.All too often it is a gatew`y to serious violence.
:20:46. > :20:49.Bluntly, Mr Speaker, it shatters lives.
:20:50. > :20:52.But despite the vital progrdss made by
:20:53. > :20:55.the Coalition Government in criminalising stalking in 2012, the
:20:56. > :20:57.sentencing powers available to the courts to protect victils
:20:58. > :21:08.He talked about the MPs of ` constituent, a family doctor,
:21:09. > :21:17.stalked for seven years. Thd man was eventually jailed.
:21:18. > :21:19.In time, after a short prison sentence and in
:21:20. > :21:21.a pattern not uncommon with this type of offence
:21:22. > :21:25.Doctor Aston received packages at her office in Gloucester
:21:26. > :21:27.and at her home in Cheltenh`m and one message
:21:28. > :21:30.clear he knew where her children went to school.
:21:31. > :21:35.The second package simply rdad, "Guess who's back?"
:21:36. > :21:38.He said the court needed grdater sentencing powers, especially when
:21:39. > :21:41.dealing with repeat offenders. for shoplifting is seven
:21:42. > :21:45.years, two years longer. Burglary, another violating
:21:46. > :21:48.offence, 14 years. The fact is despite it being such
:21:49. > :21:57.a violating and intrusive crime, despite having capachty to do
:21:58. > :22:00.such significant physical and mental harm it is still treated
:22:01. > :22:02.as a minor offence. At the very least
:22:03. > :22:07.the maximum needs to be Alex Chalk said that demand
:22:08. > :22:12.was backed by charities, He won the right to take thd bill
:22:13. > :22:17.forward, but unless the govdrnment At the start of the academic year
:22:18. > :22:25.in September, schools in England were asked to start collecthng
:22:26. > :22:27.information on pupils' nationality. Ministers insist it will be used
:22:28. > :22:30.to assess the impact But opponents feared it may be used
:22:31. > :22:38.to find illegal immigrants. A crossbench peer raised thd
:22:39. > :22:41.requirement at Lords questions. . Where a minister tried
:22:42. > :22:50.to reassure the house. If there are pupils whose fhrst
:22:51. > :22:53.language isn't English we'll be able to see how well they are dohng
:22:54. > :22:57.and how we can help their school contribute meaningfully
:22:58. > :22:58.to raising pupil outcomes. This new data is solely
:22:59. > :23:01.for the department to use in Is the Minister aware
:23:02. > :23:08.parents are appalled these questions on nationalhty and
:23:09. > :23:12.place of birth, which have nothing Is he aware that
:23:13. > :23:21.a Freedom Of Information request has revealed the Hole Office
:23:22. > :23:23.has repeatedly used the Does he not then agree that these
:23:24. > :23:32.questions are as intrusive `s listing foreign workers and should
:23:33. > :23:38.be removed from the census? Well, my Lords, the
:23:39. > :23:40.census covers a range We should be aware children
:23:41. > :23:43.of foreign nationals can face additional challenges
:23:44. > :23:45.upon starting school in the UK. They are not likely to speak English
:23:46. > :23:47.fluently and may not have been
:23:48. > :23:50.here in the full school chohce and application round and are often
:23:51. > :23:53.placed in schools they would not choose
:23:54. > :23:56.and the system they had arrhved from may be different
:23:57. > :24:01.from the English system and they may be behind our dxpected
:24:02. > :24:04.to standard simply because they have yet to cover elements
:24:05. > :24:06.of our curriculum. Understanding nationalities helps
:24:07. > :24:08.to put the right policies in place to help
:24:09. > :24:13.these children and their Can I say in respect of these
:24:14. > :24:19.children and their potential to require special support,
:24:20. > :24:24.there is another way of looking at this, which is to say a lot
:24:25. > :24:26.of children of foreign nationals are
:24:27. > :24:28.extremely well able education that has
:24:29. > :24:31.been offered to them here and many of them
:24:32. > :24:34.are bilingual, which is helpful
:24:35. > :24:39.to them and their peers. Does he not agree that it is
:24:40. > :24:53.extremely unfortunate at this time that even
:24:54. > :24:55.in appearance of an 'us different kinds of children in our
:24:56. > :24:59.school system is really, re`lly unhelpful and whether or not
:25:00. > :25:01.the information is being usdd appropriately, it does give a most
:25:02. > :25:09.unfortunate impressing? Such information may possibly be of
:25:10. > :25:14.use educationally, but what purpose - can the Minister explain, for
:25:15. > :25:17.what reason is that same information Can I reassure the noble lord
:25:18. > :25:27.that the information is There has been some
:25:28. > :25:31.mischief in the press And can I reassure the Housd
:25:32. > :25:34.that this information is kept within the Department for education
:25:35. > :25:37.and is not passed on to the And that's it for now,
:25:38. > :25:41.but do join me tomorrow for another round up of the day in Westlinster,
:25:42. > :25:44.including environment questhons in the Commons and a debate
:25:45. > :25:48.on the expansion of grammar schools