08/07/2014

:00:23. > :00:46.Today's news in the Assembly has bean domiladed bx the s`ccing nf the

:00:47. > :00:49.In the last ten minutes it has been announced that Edwina Hart will

:00:50. > :00:50.In the last ten minutes it has been this possibility for agriculture to

:00:51. > :00:52.In the last ten minutes it has been her current portfolio.

:00:53. > :00:53.In the last ten minutes it has been Griffiths will

:00:54. > :00:57.In the last ten minutes it has been Griffiths wall take

:00:58. > :00:58.In the last ten minutes it has been Griffiths will take over on

:00:59. > :00:58.envibonmelt Griffiths will take over on

:00:59. > :00:59.entibonmelt policy. Griffiths will take over on

:01:00. > :00:59.environment policy. The First Griffiths will take over on

:01:00. > :01:02.Minister said his Griffiths will take over on

:01:03. > :01:03.unacceptable. The leader of the Griffiths will take over on

:01:04. > :01:05.opposition has tabled an Griffiths will take over on

:01:06. > :01:07.question on the issue and it will be quasdion nn the hssue and it will be

:01:08. > :01:08.heard before questions to the First heard before questaons to the First

:01:09. > :01:11.Minister. the programme or any other political

:01:12. > :01:16.news, please get in touch with us. Well,

:01:17. > :01:22.@walespolitics, or send us an email. Well,

:01:23. > :01:25.at today's questions to the First Milicter and the emergencq question

:01:26. > :01:37.on the sacking of Alun Davies. The

:01:38. > :01:40.now in session and before we start now in sessaon ald before we start

:01:41. > :01:41.the questions on the paper this tha auestions on t`e paper this

:01:42. > :01:41.morning, tha auestions on t`e paper this

:01:42. > :01:45.mornang, H tha auestions on t`e paper this

:01:46. > :01:46.morning, I have this afternoon and urgent quesdion.

:01:47. > :01:49.morning, I have this afternoon and urgent question. I call on Andrew

:01:50. > :01:49.morning, I have this afternoon and urgent quesdion. I call on Andrew RT

:01:50. > :01:53.urgent qudsdion. I call on Andrew RT Davies to ask the question.

:01:54. > :01:55.urgent qudsdion. I call on Andrew RT Will the First Minister make a

:01:56. > :01:57.statement on the exit of the Will the First Minister make a

:01:58. > :01:57.Minister for Will the First Minister make a

:01:58. > :01:57.Milicter dob Natural Resources Will the First Minister make a

:01:58. > :01:58.Minister for Natural Resources and Will the First Minister make a

:01:59. > :01:59.Food Cabinet? Such a statement has been provided

:02:00. > :02:02.some hours ago. Such a statement has been provided

:02:03. > :02:06.In very shobt Such a statement has been provided

:02:07. > :02:06.In very short answer indeed, First Minicter.

:02:07. > :02:06.In very short answer indeed, First Milicter. I think

:02:07. > :02:12.In very short answer indeed, First Minister. I think it is

:02:13. > :02:13.In very short answer indeed, First recapping. Last week this

:02:14. > :02:15.In very short answer indeed, First was breaking the Ministerial Code

:02:16. > :02:19.In very short answer indeed, First but he was not sacked by the First

:02:20. > :02:20.In very short answer indeed, First Minister. A day later, the

:02:21. > :02:23.Minicter. A day later, the minhster was seeking to break it again by

:02:24. > :02:24.Minicter. A day later, the minhster asking for personal details of five

:02:25. > :02:25.meibers asking for personal details of five

:02:26. > :02:25.members of asking for personal details of five

:02:26. > :02:25.meibers of this asking for personal details of five

:02:26. > :02:26.members of this particular chamber, asking for personal details of five

:02:27. > :02:28.including myself. He was warned by incleding mqself, @e war warned by

:02:29. > :02:30.his private secretary it was his `rivate secretary it was wrong

:02:31. > :02:34.and yet he verbally asked again. his `rivate secretary it was wrong

:02:35. > :02:42.Wouldn't Damien Wright be his `rivate secretary it was wrong

:02:43. > :02:44.this behaviour? Can you confirm that this isn't normal practice within

:02:45. > :02:44.this behaviour? Can you confirm that the

:02:45. > :02:44.this behaviour? Can you confirm that tha Gelsh governlent

:02:45. > :02:46.this behaviour? Can you confirm that the Welsh government by other

:02:47. > :02:48.the Welsh governlent by other ministers and ultimately, can you

:02:49. > :02:49.the Welsh governlent by other confirm, First

:02:50. > :02:51.the Welsh governlent by other give the public confidence that

:02:52. > :02:51.thase give the public confidence that

:02:52. > :02:54.these prabtaces give the public confidence that

:02:55. > :02:57.these practices do not exist across the rest of your government that he

:02:58. > :02:58.these practices do not exist across will instigate an independent

:02:59. > :03:01.these practices do not exist across enquiry so that we can have the

:03:02. > :03:01.these practices do not exist across confidence there isn't widespread

:03:02. > :03:03.these practices do not exist across this practice and this is

:03:04. > :03:08.these practices do not exist across actions of an individual Minister

:03:09. > :03:10.actions od an individual Minister who has been removed from

:03:11. > :03:10.actions od an individual Minister government?

:03:11. > :03:11.govebnment? Can I

:03:12. > :03:12.govebnment? Can A remhnd the

:03:13. > :03:12.govebnment? Can I remind the leader of the

:03:13. > :03:13.oppocitiol Can I remind the leader of the

:03:14. > :03:15.opposition that it was the Minister 's private office that took steps to

:03:16. > :03:18.opposition that it was the Minister prevent this moving forward. I took

:03:19. > :03:18.acpion prevent this moving forward. I took

:03:19. > :03:19.action on this as quickly as I action on t`is ar quickly as I

:03:20. > :03:21.could. We peblished action on t`is ar quickly as I

:03:22. > :03:22.could. We published the correspondence, including the

:03:23. > :03:23.e-iaal, correspondence, including the

:03:24. > :03:26.e-mail, very proactively. correspondence, including the

:03:27. > :03:28.possible members may not have known possable lembers may not `ave jnown

:03:29. > :03:29.about the existence of that e-mail possable lembers may not `ave jnown

:03:30. > :03:34.if it hadn't been published. It is a possable lembers may not `ave jnown

:03:35. > :03:36.sign that we are an open government and we will publish e-mails even

:03:37. > :03:36.sign that we are an open government when they are

:03:37. > :03:37.sign that we are an open government whan they abe didfacult

:03:38. > :03:37.sign that we are an open government when they are difficult for us and

:03:38. > :03:38.than when they are difficult for us and

:03:39. > :03:40.then action is taken where I feel when they are difficult for us and

:03:41. > :03:43.ministers are no longer able to when they are difficult for us and

:03:44. > :03:43.continue when they are difficult for us and

:03:44. > :03:43.contanue hn when they are difficult for us and

:03:44. > :03:46.continue in their jobs. when they are difficult for us and

:03:47. > :03:49.Can I remind them that this is questions to the First Minister, not

:03:50. > :03:53.Can I remind them that this is a statement. Kirsty Williams.

:03:54. > :03:54.a statemelt. irstq illiams. Today's revelations about the

:03:55. > :03:54.behafiour Today's revelations about the

:03:55. > :03:56.behaviour of the former natural Today's revelations about the

:03:57. > :03:56.resources Minister Today's revelations about the

:03:57. > :03:57.resoerces Manister are Today's revelations about the

:03:58. > :03:57.resources Minister are shocking and resoerces Minister are rhockinf and

:03:58. > :04:01.inexcusable. Do you now regret not inaxcusable. o xou now regret not

:04:02. > :04:03.sacking Aled Davies last week and inaxcusable. o xou now regret not

:04:04. > :04:04.does that not inaxcusable. o xou now regret not

:04:05. > :04:06.doas that not speac inaxcusable. o xou now regret not

:04:07. > :04:06.does that not speak volumes about a sevebe

:04:07. > :04:07.does that not speak volumes about a setebe lapse

:04:08. > :04:07.does that not speak volumes about a severe lapse in judgement on your

:04:08. > :04:10.part? severe lapse in judgement on your

:04:11. > :04:12.Well, the leader of the Liberal Well, the leader of the Laberal

:04:13. > :04:15.Democrats fundamentally this Democrats fendamdntally t`is

:04:16. > :04:17.understands the situation, namely that the minister lost his position

:04:18. > :04:17.to`aq has that the minister lost his position

:04:18. > :04:26.today has nothing to do with the that the minister lost his position

:04:27. > :04:26.circuit of Wales. It occurred on the 2nd

:04:27. > :04:26.circuit of Wales. It occurred on the 2n` of

:04:27. > :04:28.circuit of Wales. It occurred on the 2nd of July. It is not possible to

:04:29. > :04:30.sack somebody before they have done sack somebody bedore thdy have done

:04:31. > :04:34.something which ends than the loss sack somebody bedore thdy have done

:04:35. > :04:36.of their job. What I can say sack somebody bedore thdy have done

:04:37. > :04:36.when this came sack somebody bedore thdy have done

:04:37. > :04:37.whan this came to sack somebody bedore thdy have done

:04:38. > :04:39.when this came to my attention, sack somebody bedore thdy have done

:04:40. > :04:40.decided that action should sack somebody bedore thdy have done

:04:41. > :04:41.decided thad action should be takeN decided thad action should be taken

:04:42. > :04:44.and the e-mails should be published and dhe e-mails rhould be published

:04:45. > :04:47.proactively. Nobody can suggest and dhe e-mails rhould be published

:04:48. > :04:49.government was put in this and dhe e-mails rhould be published

:04:50. > :04:50.situation. I decided members should be aware of what happened and the

:04:51. > :04:51.action be aware of what happened and the

:04:52. > :04:51.acpion I be aware of what happened and the

:04:52. > :04:53.action I took because I believe be aware of what happened and the

:04:54. > :04:54.is the right be aware of what happened and the

:04:55. > :04:54.is the righd way of be aware of what happened and the

:04:55. > :04:55.is the right way of conducting be aware of what happened and the

:04:56. > :04:58.Leanne Wood. be aware of what happened and the

:04:59. > :04:59.First Minister, this fiasco not be aware of what happened and the

:05:00. > :05:04.brings your judgement into be aware of what happened and the

:05:05. > :05:04.bup at be aware of what happened and the

:05:05. > :05:07.but it also risks reflecting poorly be aware of what happened and the

:05:08. > :05:10.on this institution. Do you now accept that it is wrong in terms of

:05:11. > :05:11.on this institution. Do you now braaches of

:05:12. > :05:15.on this institution. Do you now breaches of the Ministerial Code

:05:16. > :05:16.on this institution. Do you now that you act as judge

:05:17. > :05:17.on this institution. Do you now that you acd as hudge and jury and

:05:18. > :05:17.that you act as judge and jury and wihl

:05:18. > :05:18.that you act as judge and jury and will you now

:05:19. > :05:18.that you act as judge and jury and wihl you low support calls for

:05:19. > :05:19.that you act as judge and jury and will you now support calls for those

:05:20. > :05:20.functions to be passed onto an fulctions to be passed nnto an

:05:21. > :05:24.independent adjudicator? in`e`endelt adjudicator?

:05:25. > :05:25.I would never accept the situation whan

:05:26. > :05:27.I would never accept the situation when somebody other than the

:05:28. > :05:28.I would never accept the situation Milicter ban

:05:29. > :05:29.I would never accept the situation Minister can appoint or remove

:05:30. > :05:33.I would never accept the situation Cabinet ministers. That is

:05:34. > :05:35.fundamentally undemocratic and her party did not accept that and would

:05:36. > :05:35.fundamentally undemocratic and her nop accept

:05:36. > :05:36.fundamentally undemocratic and her not accept it in the previous

:05:37. > :05:38.govebnment. not accept it in the previous

:05:39. > :05:42.government. It does not exist elsewhere in the UK. That

:05:43. > :05:45.elseghere in the UC. Th`t is fundamentally wrong. It is my

:05:46. > :05:45.elseghere in the UC. Th`t is for bettep or

:05:46. > :05:46.elseghere in the UC. Th`t is for better or worse,

:05:47. > :05:47.elseghere in the UC. Th`t is for bettep or worse, to

:05:48. > :05:47.elseghere in the UC. Th`t is for better or worse, to police

:05:48. > :05:48.for bettep or wopse, to police the Ministerial Code, and not an

:05:49. > :05:54.Milicterial Code, and nnt an unelected individual. That is

:05:55. > :05:55.Milicterial Code, and nnt an point of democracy. What I will

:05:56. > :05:56.Milicterial Code, and nnt an poind of democraby. hat A will say

:05:57. > :05:58.Milicterial Code, and nnt an to the leader of Plaid

:05:59. > :06:00.Milicterial Code, and nnt an I took this

:06:01. > :06:01.Milicterial Code, and nnt an I pook this decision

:06:02. > :06:01.Milicterial Code, and nnt an I took this decision proactively,

:06:02. > :06:03.Milicterial Code, and nnt an the correspondence was published

:06:04. > :06:05.proactively. It maq well be the correspondence was published

:06:06. > :06:07.proactively. It may well be the case that this case may never have come

:06:08. > :06:07.to laght that this case may never have come

:06:08. > :06:08.to light but I took the that this case may never have come

:06:09. > :06:08.to laght `ud I tooc the view that this case may never have come

:06:09. > :06:10.to light but I took the view that that this case may never have come

:06:11. > :06:12.was grong. At was important thd was grong, It war amportant thd

:06:13. > :06:13.correspondence was published and coprespondence was publis`ed and

:06:14. > :06:17.action was taken and it shows that action war daken and it s`ows that

:06:18. > :06:20.the system has worked. Or`eb!

:06:21. > :06:21.the system has worked. Order! That is why I believe it is

:06:22. > :06:22.impobtant Order! That is why I believe it is

:06:23. > :06:25.important that where I become aware impobtant t`at where I become `ware

:06:26. > :06:29.of instances such as this, action is taken

:06:30. > :06:32.of instances such as this, action is Antoinette Sandbach.

:06:33. > :06:34.I woeld Antoinette Sandbach.

:06:35. > :06:35.I would like to put on record my I woeld like to put on record ly

:06:36. > :06:35.thanks for I woeld like to put on record ly

:06:36. > :06:38.thancs fop dhe abtaons nf I woeld like to put on record ly

:06:39. > :06:38.servants who briefly brought this to yoqr

:06:39. > :06:39.servants who briefly brought this to your attention. Because,

:06:40. > :06:41.servants who briefly brought this to yoqr attention. @ecause, of course,

:06:42. > :06:44.your attention. Because, of course, what they were being asked to do was

:06:45. > :06:44.in bbeach what they were being asked to do was

:06:45. > :06:45.in breach of the Data Protection what they were being asked to do was

:06:46. > :06:48.Act, and act which detects what they were being asked to do was

:06:49. > :06:48.Acp, and `cd which detects every Act, and act which detects every

:06:49. > :06:49.citizen of the Act, and act which detects every

:06:50. > :06:50.against dhsclosures Act, and act which detects every

:06:51. > :06:57.against disclosures of this sort. In Act, and act which detects every

:06:58. > :07:00.plenary last week I asked you to proactively publish corresponddnce

:07:01. > :07:00.proactively publish correspondence whic`

:07:01. > :07:01.proactively publish correspondence which I had requested in my

:07:02. > :07:02.proactively publish correspondence whic` I h`d requested in my e-mail

:07:03. > :07:05.proactively publish correspondence of the 13th of June and I followed

:07:06. > :07:10.that up with a request on the 2nd that up wit` a request nn the 2nd of

:07:11. > :07:12.July for further information that up wit` a request nn the 2nd of

:07:13. > :07:12.Juhy for dubther informataon to be July for dubther inform`taon to be

:07:13. > :07:16.proactively published by you, proactively publis`ed bx qou,

:07:17. > :07:19.relating to rehading to the hnvestigation. In

:07:20. > :07:23.particular, details of any rehading to the hnvestigation. In

:07:24. > :07:24.correspondence between the Minister an` dhe

:07:25. > :07:24.correspondence between the Minister and the Minister

:07:25. > :07:24.correspondence between the Minister an` dhe Minister for

:07:25. > :07:29.correspondence between the Minister and the Minister for planning and

:07:30. > :07:32.the Minister for the economy, in respect of finance or planning in

:07:33. > :07:32.the respect of finance or planning in

:07:33. > :07:35.tha circuht respect of finance or planning in

:07:36. > :07:35.the circuit of Wales. Could you plaace...

:07:36. > :07:36.the circuit of Wales. Could you please... I asked also for

:07:37. > :07:40.the circuit of Wales. Could you confirmation...

:07:41. > :07:41.the circuit of Wales. Could you Yes, thank you. Would you

:07:42. > :07:42.the circuit of Wales. Could you Yes, thanj qou. Vould ynu give an

:07:43. > :07:45.the circuit of Wales. Could you assurance that no correspondence

:07:46. > :07:46.the circuit of Wales. Could you other than that published in annex

:07:47. > :07:49.otheb thal dhat publishdd in annex three exist? And that

:07:50. > :07:50.otheb thal dhat publishdd in annex thpee exist? And t`at he

:07:51. > :07:51.otheb thal dhat publishdd in annex place in the libpary,

:07:52. > :07:52.otheb thal dhat publishdd in annex place in the library, as he said

:07:53. > :07:56.otheb thal dhat publishdd in annex would on the 1st of July, the

:07:57. > :07:56.correspondence would on the 1st of July, the

:07:57. > :07:57.coprespondence ald would on the 1st of July, the

:07:58. > :07:57.correspondence and the details that would on the 1st of July, the

:07:58. > :07:59.have been requested in ly e-mahl of have been requested in my e-mail of

:08:00. > :07:59.tha have been requested in my e-mail of

:08:00. > :08:07.the "nd od Buly? have been requested in my e-mail of

:08:08. > :08:11.First Minister. The member seems to suggest that on the 30th of June she

:08:12. > :08:13.First Minister. The member seems to wanted to see an e-mail that didn't

:08:14. > :08:13.exisd wanted to see an e-mail that didn't

:08:14. > :08:15.exist until three days later. It is exist until three days later. Ht is

:08:16. > :08:16.confused, what she has just exist until three days later. Ht is

:08:17. > :08:23.suggested. There is no doubt that exist until three days later. Ht is

:08:24. > :08:23.the private office took the right stapc

:08:24. > :08:24.the private office took the right steps and that is why the

:08:25. > :08:27.the private office took the right information was never released. That

:08:28. > :08:27.showc information was never released. That

:08:28. > :08:30.shows that the system is working. I information was never released. That

:08:31. > :08:37.became aware of the situation information was never released. That

:08:38. > :08:37.Friday. I looked at length at the sipuation

:08:38. > :08:38.Friday. I looked at length at the situation yesterday and of course,

:08:39. > :08:42.Friday. I looked at length at the the decision was taken this morning.

:08:43. > :08:44.It shows that private offices are It shows that private offaces `re

:08:45. > :08:46.not afraid to take It shows that private offaces `re

:08:47. > :08:46.nop afraid do take action where It shows that private offaces `re

:08:47. > :08:48.not afraid to take action where they It shows that private offaces `re

:08:49. > :08:53.believe breaches of the It shows that private offaces `re

:08:54. > :08:56.Code may occur. That is why action has been taken, proactive action has

:08:57. > :08:57.did their jobs. di` dheir jobs.

:08:58. > :09:01.Llyr Gruffydd bearing di` dheir jobs.

:09:02. > :09:02.Llyr Grufdydd bearang in mind di` dheir jobs.

:09:03. > :09:02.Llyr Gruffydd bearing in mind the di` dheir jobs.

:09:03. > :09:03.gravaty of dhis di` dheir jobs.

:09:04. > :09:04.gravity of this issue, First gravaty of dhis hssue, First

:09:05. > :09:06.Minister, would you gravaty of dhis hssue, First

:09:07. > :09:08.Milicter, would you accept gravaty of dhis hssue, First

:09:09. > :09:10.Minister, would you accept the Minister to come and make a

:09:11. > :09:12.Minister, would you accept the statement to us in this chamber

:09:13. > :09:15.statement to us hn this c`amber and would you expecting to make

:09:16. > :09:16.statement to us hn this c`amber and statement to the individuals who

:09:17. > :09:19.were statement to the individuals who

:09:20. > :09:20.It is not possible for a former statement to the individuals who

:09:21. > :09:23.minister to make a statement statement to the individuals who

:09:24. > :09:23.minicter to make a statement about statement to the individuals who

:09:24. > :09:27.the time when they were a Minister. tha dime vhen thdy were a Minister.

:09:28. > :09:29.That is the system. There is That is the system. here is a

:09:30. > :09:30.system of making a personal That is the system. here is a

:09:31. > :09:34.statement but it is not possible to statement bet it is not possible to

:09:35. > :09:35.ask any questions on that so I don't thinc thepe

:09:36. > :09:36.ask any questions on that so I don't think there is any mechanism to make

:09:37. > :09:39.sure that happens. think there is any mechanism to make

:09:40. > :09:41.Thank you very much. I have no more think there is any mechanism to make

:09:42. > :09:42.speakers on that question so I think there is any mechanism to make

:09:43. > :09:43.move think there is any mechanism to make

:09:44. > :09:43.mote to think there is any mechanism to make

:09:44. > :09:44.move to the paper and questions to think there is any mechanism to make

:09:45. > :09:48.First Minister. David think there is any mechanism to make

:09:49. > :09:52.What actions are the Welsh think there is any mechanism to make

:09:53. > :09:52.government taking to strengthen manufactuping

:09:53. > :09:53.government taking to strengthen manufacturing in Wales?

:09:54. > :09:54.government taking to strengthen Manufacturing is key to the Welsh

:09:55. > :09:57.Manufactuping is key to t`e Welsh economy ald we

:09:58. > :09:58.Manufactuping is key to t`e Welsh the manufacturing

:09:59. > :09:58.Manufactuping is key to t`e Welsh the manufacduring andustry in

:09:59. > :10:01.Manufactuping is key to t`e Welsh the manufacturing industry in Wales.

:10:02. > :10:03.We have the highest contribution to manufacturing in any of the nations

:10:04. > :10:03.an` manufacturing in any of the nations

:10:04. > :10:05.and begions. manufacturing in any of the nations

:10:06. > :10:07.I hardly heard that on nf manufacturing in any of the nations

:10:08. > :10:09.I hardly heard that on of the manufacturing in any of the nations

:10:10. > :10:10.talking. Last week we heard manufacturing in any of the nations

:10:11. > :10:12.tahkang. Lact week we heard 400 tahkang. Lact week we hdard 400 job

:10:13. > :10:14.losses at the steelworks, citing losses at t`e steelworkr, citing

:10:15. > :10:16.difficult global markets and diffacult global markets and the

:10:17. > :10:18.higher energy cost in the UK diffacult global markets and the

:10:19. > :10:20.compared to European competitors. To diffacult global markets and the

:10:21. > :10:21.the people of my time, it diffacult global markets and the

:10:22. > :10:21.tha `eople of my tame, ht is diffacult global markets and the

:10:22. > :10:31.the `eople of my tame, it is clear tha `eople of my tame, ht is clear

:10:32. > :10:32.that Cameron's focus is on those of tha manufacduring

:10:33. > :10:32.that Cameron's focus is on those of the manufacturing companies. The

:10:33. > :10:34.that Cameron's focus is on those of people need to be thought about

:10:35. > :10:37.people need to bd thought about and tackled now. What are you

:10:38. > :10:38.tackled nnw. hat are ynu doinf to compete in the global markets and

:10:39. > :10:40.tackled nnw. hat are ynu doinf to what discussions are you having with

:10:41. > :10:43.what discuscions are you `avinf with the

:10:44. > :10:43.what discuscions are you `avinf with higher costs that such businesses

:10:44. > :10:44.ara higher costs that such businesses

:10:45. > :10:46.are facing here in higher costs that such businesses

:10:47. > :10:46.ara facinf `ere hn the higher costs that such businesses

:10:47. > :10:46.are facing here in the UK and higher costs that such businesses

:10:47. > :10:48.competitors across Europe? higher costs that such businesses

:10:49. > :10:49.The EK Govebnment needs higher costs that such businesses

:10:50. > :10:49.The UK Government needs to higher costs that such businesses

:10:50. > :10:50.The EK Govebnment needs to put higher costs that such businesses

:10:51. > :10:51.The UK Government needs to put its moneq

:10:52. > :10:51.The UK Government needs to put its money where its

:10:52. > :10:51.The UK Government needs to put its moleq where its louth is.

:10:52. > :10:51.The UK Government needs to put its money where its mouth is. We

:10:52. > :10:54.The UK Government needs to put its moleq where its louth is. We h`ve

:10:55. > :10:58.seen ?400 million invested in Tata stael.

:10:59. > :11:00.seen ?400 million invested in Tata steel. I very much welcome that and

:11:01. > :11:00.our steel. I very much welcome that and

:11:01. > :11:01.oup belationship wath steel. I very much welcome that and

:11:02. > :11:02.our relationship with Tata steel is steel. I very much welcome that and

:11:03. > :11:04.a good one. The Chancellor of the a good ond. The Bhancellor of the

:11:05. > :11:07.Exchequer went to Tata and a good ond. The Bhancellor of the

:11:08. > :11:13.he would do more, `e has a good ond. The Bhancellor of the

:11:14. > :11:14.nothing since. They will be more job losses in energy intensive

:11:15. > :11:16.nothing since. They will be more job industries because of the inaction

:11:17. > :11:17.on t`e industries because of the inaction

:11:18. > :11:19.on the issue from the Conservatives. industries because of the inaction

:11:20. > :11:19.They industries because of the inaction

:11:20. > :11:20.Thay do not industries because of the inaction

:11:21. > :11:22.They do not care about manufacturing industries because of the inaction

:11:23. > :11:23.in Wales or elsewhere in the UK, for that matter.

:11:24. > :11:26.in Wales or elsewhere in the UK, for Wihlaam Gpaham.

:11:27. > :11:28.Wihlaam Gpa`am. If we can return to your

:11:29. > :11:28.responsibilities, First Minister. If we can return to your

:11:29. > :11:30.You will know If we can return to your

:11:31. > :11:31.Yoq gill know th`t If we can return to your

:11:32. > :11:33.You will know that many people have If we can return to your

:11:34. > :11:34.said one of the problems with in`uctry is that

:11:35. > :11:34.said one of the problems with industry is that we do

:11:35. > :11:35.said one of the problems with in`uctry is that we do not havd the

:11:36. > :11:36.industry is that we do not have the employees w`o

:11:37. > :11:39.industry is that we do not have the employees who have such literacy or

:11:40. > :11:40.industry is that we do not have the new Morrissey. What are you going to

:11:41. > :11:47.industry is that we do not have the do about that? -- new Morrissey --

:11:48. > :11:49.arithmetic. arit`metic.

:11:50. > :11:52.It is one thing to have arit`metic.

:11:53. > :11:53.and that arit`metic.

:11:54. > :11:54.an` that hs impoptant. H recognise and that is important. I recognise

:11:55. > :11:56.the membep'c point and that is important. I recognise

:11:57. > :11:59.the member's point in that regard. The UK Government are prepared to do

:12:00. > :12:00.the member's point in that regard. nothing to help these energy

:12:01. > :12:02.inpensive nothing to help these energy

:12:03. > :12:02.intensive industries so we will nothing to help these energy

:12:03. > :12:04.more of these job nothing to help these energy

:12:05. > :12:09.Gethin Jenkins. nothing to help these energy

:12:10. > :12:12.Gephan Jelkans. First Minister, nothing to help these energy

:12:13. > :12:14.met with Tata steel yesterday in my office and they told me it was

:12:15. > :12:16.met with Tata steel yesterday in my strategic decision in terms of the

:12:17. > :12:18.jobs that were to be lost and the strategic decision in terms of the

:12:19. > :12:24.majority of those jobs would strategic decision in terms of the

:12:25. > :12:24.from voluntary redundancies. Claably,

:12:25. > :12:26.from voluntary redundancies. Clearly, we don't want to see

:12:27. > :12:32.from voluntary redundancies. jobs lost. What discussion would you

:12:33. > :12:37.have a global level with those managing Tata in India to make sure

:12:38. > :12:39.that Wales is still in the vanguard in terms of what is happening and in

:12:40. > :12:39.termc in terms of what is happening and in

:12:40. > :12:39.tepmc of encurinf in terms of what is happening and in

:12:40. > :12:41.terms of ensuring that those to in terms of what is happening and in

:12:42. > :12:41.retrain in terms of what is happening and in

:12:42. > :12:44.reprain jobs in terms of what is happening and in

:12:45. > :12:48.retrain jobs for the future. I was speaking to Tata approximately

:12:49. > :12:51.retrain jobs for the future. two years ago. I will be returning

:12:52. > :12:52.to India in October two years ago. I will be returning

:12:53. > :12:52.to India hn Octo`er and I two years ago. I will be returning

:12:53. > :12:52.to India in October and I intend two years ago. I will be returning

:12:53. > :12:56.meet with Tata again. I have been two years ago. I will be returning

:12:57. > :12:57.meeting regularly with the two years ago. I will be returning

:12:58. > :12:58.meetang regelarly with the managers meeting regularly with the managers

:12:59. > :12:59.in Eerope, which meeting regularly with the managers

:13:00. > :13:00.in Europe, which is also important. meeting regularly with the managers

:13:01. > :13:02.I cannot welcome the fact that so I cannot velcome t`e fabt that so

:13:03. > :13:06.many jobs will be lost but it is I cannot velcome t`e fabt that so

:13:07. > :13:10.something to bear in mind that the jobs will be going through voluntary

:13:11. > :13:13.redundancy. It is obvious that if jobs will be going through voluntary

:13:14. > :13:15.the investment hadn't taken place, the `osition

:13:16. > :13:18.the investment hadn't taken place, the position would be much worse

:13:19. > :13:20.the investment hadn't taken place, Tata. We have to ensure that are

:13:21. > :13:20.claably Tata. We have to ensure that are

:13:21. > :13:23.cleably Port al`ot but other `reas Tata. We have to ensure that are

:13:24. > :13:27.of the company can Tata. We have to ensure that are

:13:28. > :13:27.You will Tata. We have to ensure that are

:13:28. > :13:28.Yoq gill know, Tata. We have to ensure that are

:13:29. > :13:33.You will know, of course, that the Yoq gill jnow, od coursd, that the

:13:34. > :13:33.Chancellor did announce help for enargy

:13:34. > :13:34.Chancellor did announce help for energy intensive industries but it

:13:35. > :13:37.Chancellor did announce help for will come too late for these jobs.

:13:38. > :13:37.Chancellor did announce help for Cal A

:13:38. > :13:37.Chancellor did announce help for Can I ask

:13:38. > :13:38.Chancellor did announce help for Cal A ask what ynur

:13:39. > :13:38.Chancellor did announce help for Can I ask what your government has

:13:39. > :13:40.Chancellor did announce help for done in tombs of trying to mitigate

:13:41. > :13:42.dole in tombs of trying to mitigate the impact of these job losses and

:13:43. > :13:44.dole in tombs of trying to mitigate where you having discussions with

:13:45. > :13:44.the EK where you having discussions with

:13:45. > :13:45.the UK Government on how where you having discussions with

:13:46. > :13:47.the EK Gotebnment on how these tha EK Gotebnment on how these can

:13:48. > :13:48.be brought forward to be bbought forwapd to prevent

:13:49. > :13:50.further job losses? be bbought forwapd to prevent

:13:51. > :13:52.It is not good to say unfortunately, It ic not good to say unfortun`tely,

:13:53. > :13:55.nothing has happened. Two years nophing h`s happdned. Tvo years

:13:56. > :13:58.away, they are sayang. nophing h`s happdned. Tvo years

:13:59. > :13:59.away, they are saying. It is two yearc

:14:00. > :14:00.away, they are saying. It is two years away, they are saying it will

:14:01. > :14:01.be( years away, they are saying it will

:14:02. > :14:01.be, before any years away, they are saying it will

:14:02. > :14:02.be( before any hdlp years away, they are saying it will

:14:03. > :14:04.be, before any help is given to be( before any hdlp is fiven to

:14:05. > :14:05.energy intensive industries. Wd cannot help those industries with

:14:06. > :14:05.their cannot help those industries with

:14:06. > :14:06.theib cost cannot help those industries with

:14:07. > :14:09.their cost because that is in cannot help those industries with

:14:10. > :14:09.coltrol od dhe cannot help those industries with

:14:10. > :14:10.control of the UK Government. They cannot help those industries with

:14:11. > :14:12.must take action like they haven't cannot help those industries with

:14:13. > :14:13.so far. We have cannot help those industries with

:14:14. > :14:13.so far. Wd `ave vorked vith cannot help those industries with

:14:14. > :14:16.so far. We have worked with Tata in cannot help those industries with

:14:17. > :14:21.terms of being able to provide them with help and investment in years

:14:22. > :14:23.gone by that we can't provide them with revenue subsidy on energy

:14:24. > :14:24.costc. We with revenue subsidy on energy

:14:25. > :14:27.costs. We need the UK Government with revenue subsidy on energy

:14:28. > :14:28.take action before 2016 or we will see more jobs being lost in

:14:29. > :14:30.take action before 2016 or we will Welsh economy.

:14:31. > :14:33.Wehsh ecolomy. Keith Davies.

:14:34. > :14:34.Wehsh ecolomy. Thank you, residing

:14:35. > :14:36.Wehsh ecolomy. Thank you, residhng officer.

:14:37. > :14:36.Wehsh ecolomy. Thank you, residing officer. For the

:14:37. > :14:36.Firsd Thank you, residing officer. For the

:14:37. > :14:36.Fipsd Minhster Thank you, residing officer. For the

:14:37. > :14:37.First Minister provide an Thank you, residing officer. For the

:14:38. > :14:37.Fipsd Minhster ppovide an update First Minister provide an update on

:14:38. > :14:39.tha First Minister provide an update on

:14:40. > :14:42.the Welsh government policy on the Welsh governlent policy on

:14:43. > :14:46.renewable energy. the Welsh governlent policy on

:14:47. > :14:47.The plan was published in March and it describes the progress we have

:14:48. > :14:48.ma`e in enabling it describes the progress we have

:14:49. > :14:48.made in enabling investment and it describes the progress we have

:14:49. > :14:53.driving benefit from driving benefit drom Wels`

:14:54. > :14:54.businesses and communities. It driving benefit drom Wels`

:14:55. > :14:55.outlines what we will driving benefit drom Wels`

:14:56. > :14:56.ouplanes vhat we wall bd doing driving benefit drom Wels`

:14:57. > :14:56.outlines what we will be doing in driving benefit drom Wels`

:14:57. > :14:57.coming years to achieve our coiing yearc to `c`ieve our

:14:58. > :14:58.ambition. ambidion.

:14:59. > :15:00.I was pleased to hear today that I wac pleased to hear today th`t

:15:01. > :15:02.there were three sites in Wales that I wac pleased to hear today th`t

:15:03. > :15:04.had been given permission to develop ha` been fifen pdrmission to ddvelop

:15:05. > :15:06.marine energy plans by Crown states. ha` been fifen pdrmission to ddvelop

:15:07. > :15:11.Can I ask you what negotiation ha` been fifen pdrmission to ddvelop

:15:12. > :15:12.government has had with the government has had with the

:15:13. > :15:12.govebnment an government has had with the

:15:13. > :15:13.government in Westminster oN government has had with the

:15:14. > :15:20.government in Westminster on the gotebnment an Westminster on the

:15:21. > :15:22.tidal lagoon plans in Swansea Bay? Of course, ge

:15:23. > :15:23.tidal lagoon plans in Swansea Bay? Of course, we are responsible for

:15:24. > :15:24.tidal lagoon plans in Swansea Bay? marine consents, and they are

:15:25. > :15:26.marine colsents, and thdy are responsible for the planning system.

:15:27. > :15:31.As regards the sea bed, that responsible for the planning system.

:15:32. > :15:32.As regardr dhe sda bed, that is responsible for the planning system.

:15:33. > :15:32.As regards the sea bed, that is a mapter

:15:33. > :15:34.As regards the sea bed, that is a matter for the Crown Estates, but,

:15:35. > :15:35.As regards the sea bed, that is a of course, the situation would be

:15:36. > :15:37.much easier if we were in the same of course, the situation would be

:15:38. > :15:41.position as Scotland were everything of course, the situation would be

:15:42. > :15:41.was done by the same body, but that isn'd

:15:42. > :15:43.was done by the same body, but that isn't how things are at present and

:15:44. > :15:44.was done by the same body, but that Wales is losing out because

:15:45. > :15:49.was done by the same body, but that that. I recently received an

:15:50. > :15:50.was done by the same body, but that from a former constituent,

:15:51. > :15:50.from a former colstituent, a professional engineer

:15:51. > :15:51.from a former colstituent, a professional enghneer bx

:15:52. > :15:54.from a former colstituent, a professional engineer by trade, who

:15:55. > :15:57.was looking to relocate in Wales to espablish a small projects

:15:58. > :16:00.was looking to relocate in Wales to establish a small projects centred

:16:01. > :16:03.around hydropower. He, like others, have contacted me in this regard and

:16:04. > :16:04.around hydropower. He, like others, have told me how difficult it has

:16:05. > :16:04.bean have told me how difficult it has

:16:05. > :16:07.been to get a licence from have told me how difficult it has

:16:08. > :16:07.been to gdt a licence from Natural bean to gdt a licence from Natural

:16:08. > :16:09.Resources Wales, and what is the bean to gdt a licence from Natural

:16:10. > :16:12.government doing to remove the govebnment doing to remnve the

:16:13. > :16:13.barriers that are preventing and discouraging businesses from

:16:14. > :16:14.espablishhng discouraging businesses from

:16:15. > :16:17.establishing themselves in this regard? I'm not aware of any

:16:18. > :16:19.establishing themselves in this barriers, but if he provides me

:16:20. > :16:20.establishing themselves in this barraers, bet if he provides md with

:16:21. > :16:21.establishing themselves in this more information,

:16:22. > :16:28.mope infopmation, A will anvestigate that for Kim. Thank you. The

:16:29. > :16:30.that for Jim. Th`nc you. The government has failed miserably

:16:31. > :16:32.that for Jim. Th`nc you. The terms of achieving its target, in

:16:33. > :16:38.that for Jim. Th`nc you. The terms of producing green energy. One

:16:39. > :16:38.of the barriers that prevents developmeltc

:16:39. > :16:40.of the barriers that prevents developments at a local and

:16:41. > :16:41.of the barriers that prevents community

:16:42. > :16:42.of the barriers that prevents commenity level, of course,

:16:43. > :16:42.of the barriers that prevents community level, of course, is the

:16:43. > :16:43.distbibution community level, of course, is the

:16:44. > :16:43.distribution network available in community level, of course, is the

:16:44. > :16:46.Wales, both community level, of course, is the

:16:47. > :16:47.Wahes, both locallq and community level, of course, is the

:16:48. > :16:47.Wales, both locally and the larger community level, of course, is the

:16:48. > :16:48.scale networks, but particularly the community level, of course, is the

:16:49. > :16:52.local networks which are in such a community level, of course, is the

:16:53. > :16:56.poor state that you cannot connect community level, of course, is the

:16:57. > :16:57.into them. What discussion community level, of course, is the

:16:58. > :16:57.into them, What discusshon has community level, of course, is the

:16:58. > :16:58.into them. What discussion has the community level, of course, is the

:16:59. > :16:58.government had with community level, of course, is the

:16:59. > :16:58.gotebnment `ad wit` the community level, of course, is the

:16:59. > :17:02.government had with the energy community level, of course, is the

:17:03. > :17:06.companies to ensure there is a community level, of course, is the

:17:07. > :17:08.robust network, particularly in rural Wales, but

:17:09. > :17:09.robust network, particularly in rural ales, but also in

:17:10. > :17:11.robust network, particularly in areas, where there are possibilities

:17:12. > :17:13.robust network, particularly in to produce energy at a local level,

:17:14. > :17:17.an` to produce energy at a local level,

:17:18. > :17:17.and a community level? As regards the netwopk,

:17:18. > :17:18.and a community level? As regards the network, that is not an

:17:19. > :17:22.tha netwopk, that as not an isrue for

:17:23. > :17:25.tha netwopk, that as not an isrue It is a matter for the National

:17:26. > :17:27.tha netwopk, that as not an isrue Grid. I don't know whether the

:17:28. > :17:29.tha netwopk, that as not an isrue member is talking about the

:17:30. > :17:33.member is talkinf about t`e electricity network, me me the

:17:34. > :17:35.elacdricity networc, me me the grid, or t`e network of energx

:17:36. > :17:36.elacdricity networc, me me the grid, or the network of energy producing

:17:37. > :17:38.elacdricity networc, me me the grid, or generating sites. Of course, may

:17:39. > :17:38.elacdricity networc, me me the grid, I saq

:17:39. > :17:41.elacdricity networc, me me the grid, I say that we wish to promote those

:17:42. > :17:44.I saq that ge wish to promote those energy generating sites,

:17:45. > :17:49.I saq that ge wish to promote those course, there are schemes that have

:17:50. > :17:51.ensured that that happens. As ensured thad that `appens. As

:17:52. > :17:52.regards the electricity network, the regabds the electracity network, the

:17:53. > :17:55.energy network, it is true to enargy network, ht is true to ray

:17:56. > :17:58.that many parts of Wales are enargy network, ht is true to ray

:17:59. > :17:58.a position enargy network, ht is true to ray

:17:59. > :18:00.a pocitiol do enargy network, ht is true to ray

:18:01. > :18:01.a position to attract huge investment for factories and so

:18:02. > :18:03.a position to attract huge because the network is too light,

:18:04. > :18:04.bup because the network is too light,

:18:05. > :18:04.but that because the network is too light,

:18:05. > :18:05.bup that hs a because the network is too light,

:18:06. > :18:06.but that is a problem he has to discess

:18:07. > :18:07.but that is a problem he has to discuss with National

:18:08. > :18:08.but that is a problem he has to discuss wit` ational Grid. We

:18:09. > :18:11.but that is a problem he has to discuss with National Grid. We move

:18:12. > :18:11.but that is a problem he has to now to questions for the

:18:12. > :18:11.but that is a problem he has to now do qudsdions for thd party

:18:12. > :18:13.now to questions for the party leaders. Leanne Vood.

:18:14. > :18:14.now to questions for the party leaders. Leanne Wood. The

:18:15. > :18:19.now to questions for the party Minister issued a mission -- written

:18:20. > :18:21.statement regarding an investigation into the behaviour of one of his

:18:22. > :18:24.statement regarding an investigation ministers. The First Minister said,

:18:25. > :18:25."havang ministers. The First Minister said,

:18:26. > :18:25."having carefully considered the mapter,

:18:26. > :18:29."having carefully considered the matter, it's clear to me that the

:18:30. > :18:34."having carefully considered the ministerial code was breached. And

:18:35. > :18:35.he said he would ministerial code was breached. And

:18:36. > :18:35.he said he gould be taking ministerial code was breached. And

:18:36. > :18:36.he said he would be taking no he said hd gould be takhng no

:18:37. > :18:39.further action. Could the First he said hd gould be takhng no

:18:40. > :18:44.Minister please share with us his Milicter please rhare wit` us his

:18:45. > :18:44.criteria for which breaches of the minicterial

:18:45. > :18:45.criteria for which breaches of the ministerial code are stackable

:18:46. > :18:48.criteria for which breaches of the offences, and which are not.

:18:49. > :18:56.criteria for which breaches of the the one today was. First Minister,

:18:57. > :18:57.criteria for which breaches of the had you demonstrated last week

:18:58. > :19:00.bepter had you demonstrated last week

:19:01. > :19:02.better judgement, then you would not be finding yourself in this

:19:03. > :19:03.huiiliatilg be finding yourself in this

:19:04. > :19:07.humiliating position. It cannot be be finding yourself in this

:19:08. > :19:09.right for different breaches be finding yourself in this

:19:10. > :19:11.different parts of the ministerial be finding yourself in this

:19:12. > :19:11.code to ilcer at be finding yourself in this

:19:12. > :19:14.code to incur at different times code to ilcer at dafferent timds

:19:15. > :19:17.with different sanctions. Does the wiph different s`nctionr. Does the

:19:18. > :19:18.First Minister now concede he was Firsd inhsder nnw concede he vas

:19:19. > :19:19.wrong to try to cling Firsd inhsder nnw concede he vas

:19:20. > :19:19.wrong to trq to clang on Firsd inhsder nnw concede he vas

:19:20. > :19:20.wrong to try to cling on to cling onpo

:19:21. > :19:21.wrong to try to cling on to cling onto the former minister for natural

:19:22. > :19:30.onpo the fobmer linister for n`tural resources last week for his

:19:31. > :19:31.onpo the fobmer linister for n`tural political reasons? No. Back to the

:19:32. > :19:37.script. I think this is Leanne political reasons? No. Back to the

:19:38. > :19:40.scpipt. I t`ink thas is Leanne WooD script. I think this is Leanne Wood

:19:41. > :19:43.'s Question Time, not other members'. This is supposed to be a

:19:44. > :19:49.meibers'. T`is is supposed to be a scrutiny of the First Minister. In

:19:50. > :19:53.meibers'. T`is is supposed to be a paragraph 68 of

:19:54. > :19:54.meibers'. T`is is supposed to be a paragraph 60 of the investigative

:19:55. > :19:55.meibers'. T`is is supposed to be a report, you asked his private

:19:56. > :19:56.meibers'. T`is is supposed to be a secretary to make the

:19:57. > :19:57.meibers'. T`is is supposed to be a secretary to makd the Fhrst

:19:58. > :20:02.meibers'. T`is is supposed to be a Minister's offers unaware, "that

:20:03. > :20:03.meibers'. T`is is supposed to be a have sought advice on

:20:04. > :20:04.meibers'. T`is is supposed to be a ministerial code with reference to

:20:05. > :20:10.this issue. " But he didn't say is this issud. " But `e didn't sax is

:20:11. > :20:10.that he had been advised not to coiment

:20:11. > :20:15.that he had been advised not to comment on the matter even in his AM

:20:16. > :20:17.that he had been advised not to capacity. How many times do you

:20:18. > :20:18.thinc you capacity. How many times do you

:20:19. > :20:18.think you are misled capacity. How many times do you

:20:19. > :20:19.thinc you abe misled by capacity. How many times do you

:20:20. > :20:20.think you are misled by your former capacity. How many times do you

:20:21. > :20:22.minister? And are there minicter? And are there any other

:20:23. > :20:23.instances that you are aware minicter? And are there any other

:20:24. > :20:24.instances that you are `ware of minicter? And are there any other

:20:25. > :20:27.are not currently in the public minicter? And are there any other

:20:28. > :20:28.domain? No is the answer to the minicter? And are there any other

:20:29. > :20:30.second question. With regards to the minicter? And are there any other

:20:31. > :20:33.first point, it is correct to say fipsd poilt, it hs correct to ray

:20:34. > :20:35.that the minister didn't follow the fipsd poilt, it hs correct to ray

:20:36. > :20:39.advice. However, as fipsd poilt, it hs correct to ray

:20:40. > :20:42.week, the advice was, in my view, nop

:20:43. > :20:48.week, the advice was, in my view, not correct and very

:20:49. > :20:48.week, the advice was, in my view, not correct and tery cattious.

:20:49. > :20:48.week, the advice was, in my view, not correct and very cautious. He

:20:49. > :20:52.nop correct and tery cattaous. He received advice, that advice was

:20:53. > :20:53.nop correct and tery cattaous. He overcautious, as I have said, he

:20:54. > :20:53.di`n't overcautious, as I have said, he

:20:54. > :20:55.didn't follow it, that is true, but overcautious, as I have said, he

:20:56. > :20:56.given the nature overcautious, as I have said, he

:20:57. > :20:58.giten the nature of the overcautious, as I have said, he

:20:59. > :20:58.given the nature of the advice, I overcautious, as I have said, he

:20:59. > :21:00.took the view the advice should overcautious, as I have said, he

:21:01. > :21:02.have been given to him in that overcautious, as I have said, he

:21:03. > :21:04.That was my judgement at the time, overcautious, as I have said, he

:21:05. > :21:07.this is a different issue, and my this is a dafferent isste, and my

:21:08. > :21:08.advice now this is a dafferent isste, and my

:21:09. > :21:09.adtice now is this is a dafferent isste, and my

:21:10. > :21:09.advice now is that the minister adtice now as th`t the linister

:21:10. > :21:11.could not continue in his role. adtice now as th`t the linister

:21:12. > :21:17.Andrew RT Davies. Thank you. You've adtice now as th`t the linister

:21:18. > :21:18.taken eight questions on the subject adtice now as th`t the linister

:21:19. > :21:19.to`ay, Fipsd adtice now as th`t the linister

:21:20. > :21:20.today, First Minister, and not one adtice now as th`t the linister

:21:21. > :21:21.word of adtice now as th`t the linister

:21:22. > :21:21.wopd of regret adtice now as th`t the linister

:21:22. > :21:24.word of regret has passed your lips, adtice now as th`t the linister

:21:25. > :21:26.and you haven't passed on an apology to anyone of the five members

:21:27. > :21:29.to anyone of the fave mdmbers hn this chamber whom the information

:21:30. > :21:31.to anyone of the fave mdmbers hn was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:32. > :21:33.responsible for the actions of a was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:34. > :21:35.minister, you often stand there and was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:36. > :21:35.tell us this, so would was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:36. > :21:36.tell us thic, so would xou was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:37. > :21:38.tell us this, so would you use this was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:39. > :21:39.opportunity to extend an apology to was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:40. > :21:44.the five members of this chamber? was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:45. > :21:46.Yes, because I think it is was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:47. > :21:48.that ministers should ask was sought by the Minister. You are

:21:49. > :21:50.that ministers should ark for confidential information. It was not

:21:51. > :21:51.that ministers should ark for in regard to all the people

:21:52. > :21:53.involved. For one in regard to all the people

:21:54. > :21:54.intolved. For ond of them, the in regard to all the people

:21:55. > :21:55.information wasn't public domain, in regard to all the people

:21:56. > :22:01.but for the others he was wrong, he in regard to all the people

:22:02. > :22:04.should not have been made that request,

:22:05. > :22:05.should not have been made that should hate been

:22:06. > :22:06.should not have been made that should have been mentioned in that

:22:07. > :22:07.should not have been made that way. I'm glad you are able to

:22:08. > :22:08.should not have been made that way. I'm flad you are able to nffer

:22:09. > :22:12.should not have been made that that apology to the members in

:22:13. > :22:14.that apologq to the members in this chamber, but it took nine questions

:22:15. > :22:15.that apologq to the members in this for

:22:16. > :22:15.that apologq to the members in this fop qou

:22:16. > :22:20.that apologq to the members in this for you to do that. I am one of

:22:21. > :22:21.those named in members. How can you now have confidence in this

:22:22. > :22:21.in`ifidual now have confidence in this

:22:22. > :22:26.individual in the way that he has indifidual an thd way that he has

:22:27. > :22:26.acted in a ministerial role, being abhe

:22:27. > :22:27.acted in a ministerial role, being able to carry on undertaking

:22:28. > :22:30.acted in a ministerial role, being role an elected member to

:22:31. > :22:31.rohe an elected lember to this chamber for the Labour Party as an

:22:32. > :22:35.rohe an elected lember to this Assembly Member? Do you not think

:22:36. > :22:36.rohe an elected lember to this there is a

:22:37. > :22:36.rohe an elected lember to this thare is a complete

:22:37. > :22:37.rohe an elected lember to this conflict-of-interest in the ability

:22:38. > :22:39.of that individual conflict-of-interest in the ability

:22:40. > :22:39.of that indavidu`l to stay here conflict-of-interest in the ability

:22:40. > :22:41.of that individual to stay here as an elected member given the abuse

:22:42. > :22:41.of that individual to stay here as an elected membep given the abuse Of

:22:42. > :22:44.of that individual to stay here as office he had? That's

:22:45. > :22:45.of that individual to stay here as ofdice he had? That's nnnsense.

:22:46. > :22:45.of that individual to stay here as office he had? That's nonsense. It

:22:46. > :22:47.is a breach of office he had? That's nonsense. It

:22:48. > :22:49.is a breabh of mhnasterial codd. THe office he had? That's nonsense. It

:22:50. > :22:51.Minister has lost his job as a result of it. It doesn't mean he's

:22:52. > :22:53.not able to carry on as result of it. It doesn't mean he's

:22:54. > :22:53.nop able to carry on as Assembly not able to carry on as Assembly

:22:54. > :22:57.Meiber. not able to carry on as Assembly

:22:58. > :22:58.Member. I find that answer not able to carry on as Assembly

:22:59. > :22:59.Member. I fand that ansver deeply Member. I find that answer deeply

:23:00. > :23:01.offensive because your Minister was Member. I find that answer deeply

:23:02. > :23:05.trying to seek information to cause Member. I find that answer deeply

:23:06. > :23:07.political damage to individuals in Member. I find that answer deeply

:23:08. > :23:07.this chamber. That Member. I find that answer deeply

:23:08. > :23:08.this cham`eb. Th`t was Member. I find that answer deeply

:23:09. > :23:10.this chamber. That was the only explanation you can have for why he

:23:11. > :23:13.explanation you ban havd for why he sought that information. If he

:23:14. > :23:14.soug`t th`t infopmation. Af he undertook that exercise

:23:15. > :23:14.soug`t th`t infopmation. Af he undebtook t`at exercise as a

:23:15. > :23:15.undertook t`at exercise as a minister, what would prevent him

:23:16. > :23:18.minicter, w`at would prevent hhm seeking to have the same principles

:23:19. > :23:19.and conducting hhs seeking to have the same principles

:23:20. > :23:20.and conducting his role as seeking to have the same principles

:23:21. > :23:25.Assembly Member? As I said, Assembly Lember? As s`id, thhs

:23:26. > :23:26.goes to the worst excesses to the ol`

:23:27. > :23:28.goes to the worst excesses to the old Gordon Brown regime and Damian

:23:29. > :23:30.goes to the worst excesses to the McBride at Westminster. We are

:23:31. > :23:31.goes to the worst excesses to the supposed to have a different way of

:23:32. > :23:33.doing politics here supposed to have a different way of

:23:34. > :23:36.order! supposed to have a different way of

:23:37. > :23:37.or`eb! With the greatest ordeb! With the freatest respect,

:23:38. > :23:40.you are the first to say minister ordeb! With the freatest respect,

:23:41. > :23:42.who exercise judgement in keeping in ordeb! With the freatest respect,

:23:43. > :23:43.his post last week ordeb! With the freatest respect,

:23:44. > :23:45.his `ost lact week and ordeb! With the freatest respect,

:23:46. > :23:46.his post last week and now you are expecting us to take the

:23:47. > :23:48.expecting uc to tace thd assurances that you've given this week as

:23:49. > :23:53.expecting uc to tace thd assurances correct. Can we, therefore, have an

:23:54. > :23:55.expecting uc to tace thd assurances independent enquiry to look at the

:23:56. > :23:55.workangs independent enquiry to look at the

:23:56. > :23:56.workings of independent enquiry to look at the

:23:57. > :24:00.wopkangs nf govepnment ro that the workings of government so that the

:24:01. > :24:02.people of Wales and, importantly, organisations, individuals

:24:03. > :24:03.people of Wales and, importantly, organisations, ildavidu`ls and

:24:04. > :24:03.people of Wales and, importantly, polidicials can

:24:04. > :24:04.people of Wales and, importantly, politicians can have assurances that

:24:05. > :24:06.this type of practices is not common politicians can have assurances that

:24:07. > :24:08.practice in the Welsh pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:09. > :24:11.that you lead? It is not common pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:12. > :24:12.practice given the fact pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:13. > :24:12.pracdice fifen the fact t`e private pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:13. > :24:15.office did its job and I took the pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:16. > :24:17.action that I did. And pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:18. > :24:17.action th`t I did. And proactively pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:18. > :24:19.publish the e-mail which was the pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:20. > :24:19.right thing pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:20. > :24:20.righd thilg to do pracdice hn the Velsh gnvernment

:24:21. > :24:20.right thing to do because righd thilg to dn becaure I thhnk

:24:21. > :24:24.it's important that where events righd thilg to dn becaure I thhnk

:24:25. > :24:26.like this happen, members are aware of what is going on and the action

:24:27. > :24:29.has been taken as a result. I see no has been taken ar a restlt. I ree no

:24:30. > :24:33.complaint. He is on dodgy has been taken ar a restlt. I ree no

:24:34. > :24:34.coiplaint, He is on dodgy ground! complaint. He is on dodgy ground!

:24:35. > :24:34.Wiph complaint. He is on dodgy ground!

:24:35. > :24:35.With Andy Coulson. complaint. He is on dodgy ground!

:24:36. > :24:37.With Andy Coulsol. Nobody complaint. He is on dodgy ground!

:24:38. > :24:40.With Andy Coulson. Nobody is in jail. Unlike his own party! That is

:24:41. > :24:40.soiedhing jail. Unlike his own party! That is

:24:41. > :24:42.something he should reflect jail. Unlike his own party! That is

:24:43. > :24:44.soiedhing he should reflect on. He's jail. Unlike his own party! That is

:24:45. > :24:45.starting to shout. Let me put soiedhing

:24:46. > :24:47.starting to shout. Let me put something to him. He talks

:24:48. > :24:49.starting to shout. Let me put apology. He's had an apology, and

:24:50. > :24:50.apology. He's had an apnlogy, `nd it was due. Vhere was

:24:51. > :24:51.apology. He's had an apnlogy, `nd it was due. Where was he last

:24:52. > :24:52.apology. He's had an apnlogy, `nd it was due. Vhere was he last week

:24:53. > :24:52.apology. He's had an apnlogy, `nd it was due. Where was he last week when

:24:53. > :24:53.apology. He's had an apnlogy, `nd it we all waited to meet the Prince of

:24:54. > :24:54.Wahec? He we all waited to meet the Prince of

:24:55. > :24:55.Wales? He didn't turn we all waited to meet the Prince of

:24:56. > :24:55.Wahec? He dadn't turn up we all waited to meet the Prince of

:24:56. > :24:55.Wales? He didn't turn up and Walec? He dadn't turn up and dhdn't

:24:56. > :24:59.give an explanation. That is gite an explanation. Th`t is

:25:00. > :25:00.something he needs to looks plain to tha

:25:01. > :25:04.something he needs to looks plain to the people of Wales. My apology

:25:05. > :25:06.something he needs to looks plain to extended to the organisers. I was

:25:07. > :25:06.ilh extended to the organisers. I was

:25:07. > :25:07.ill on Thtrcday. extended to the organisers. I was

:25:08. > :25:08.ill on Thursday. I extended to the organisers. I was

:25:09. > :25:09.with a stroke that extended to the organisers. I was

:25:10. > :25:09.with a stpoce th`t my extended to the organisers. I was

:25:10. > :25:09.with a stroke that my mother-in-law with a stpoce th`t my mnt`er-in-law

:25:10. > :25:14.had just had the night before, First with a stpoce th`t my mnt`er-in-law

:25:15. > :25:16.Minister. You might well want to consider your position. You once

:25:17. > :25:21.Minister. You might well want to accused me before when my father

:25:22. > :25:23.Minister. You might well want to died in the Princess of

:25:24. > :25:23.diad in the Prinbess of Wales Hospital. Even now accused

:25:24. > :25:24.diad in the Prinbess of Wales Hospatal. Efen now accured me `

:25:25. > :25:25.Hospital. Even now accused me a second time and I won't stand for

:25:26. > :25:27.second time and H won't stand for it a third time. I've no idea what he's

:25:28. > :25:30.a third time. I'te no idea what he's talking about in terms of the first

:25:31. > :25:38.a third time. I'te no idea what he's occasion. Order, order! What I can

:25:39. > :25:38.say to him... I'm sorry, First Minicter.

:25:39. > :25:42.say to him... I'm sorry, First Minister. Order! I cannot hear what

:25:43. > :25:46.say to him... I'm sorry, First you're saying. And I think this

:25:47. > :25:49.say to him... I'm sorry, First very serious discussion, I want no

:25:50. > :25:51.say to him... I'm sorry, First more shouting from the side.

:25:52. > :25:53.say to him... I'm sorry, First Minister, carry on. I was

:25:54. > :25:53.say to him... I'm sorry, First Minicter, carry on. I was not

:25:54. > :25:54.say to him... I'm sorry, First Minister, carry on. I was not told.

:25:55. > :25:57.say to him... I'm sorry, First If I had been, I would not have

:25:58. > :26:01.say to him... I'm sorry, First raised it, so, therefore, I retract

:26:02. > :26:01.tha raised it, so, therefore, I retract

:26:02. > :26:05.the comment. I apologise for raised it, so, therefore, I retract

:26:06. > :26:06.explanation was given. I understand explanation was fiven. H understand

:26:07. > :26:08.the situation now. I explanation was fiven. H understand

:26:09. > :26:09.tha cituation now. I extend explanation was fiven. H understand

:26:10. > :26:11.the situation now. I extend my condolences to the Leader of the

:26:12. > :26:14.the situation now. I extend my Opposition. And I understand

:26:15. > :26:19.the situation now. I extend my that was the case. Leader of

:26:20. > :26:19.the situation now. I extend my Wehs` Libdral

:26:20. > :26:20.the situation now. I extend my Welsh Liberal Democrats.

:26:21. > :26:21.the situation now. I extend my Wehs` Libdral Democrats. Cirsty

:26:22. > :26:24.Welsh Liberal Democrats. Kirsty Wihlaams.

:26:25. > :26:25.Welsh Liberal Democrats. Kirsty Williams. First Minister,

:26:26. > :26:26.Welsh Liberal Democrats. Kirsty Williams. Farst Minister, apart

:26:27. > :26:27.Williams. First Minister, apart from the situation which we will become

:26:28. > :26:29.tha cituation whhc` we vill become aware of over the

:26:30. > :26:29.tha cituation whhc` we vill become aware of nver the last two

:26:30. > :26:30.tha cituation whhc` we vill become aware of over the last two weeks, is

:26:31. > :26:33.tha cituation whhc` we vill become this the first time you have had

:26:34. > :26:36.tha cituation whhc` we vill become cause to deal with inappropriate

:26:37. > :26:39.caqse to deal with inappropriate behaviour by Alun Davies, and have

:26:40. > :26:40.behafiour bq lul Davies, and have you had previously

:26:41. > :26:40.you had ppefiously complaants from civil servants

:26:41. > :26:41.you had ppefiously complaants from civil sertants op

:26:42. > :26:42.you had ppefiously complaants from civil servants or others about the

:26:43. > :26:42.you had ppefiously complaants from behaviour of

:26:43. > :26:43.you had ppefiously complaants from behafiour of that

:26:44. > :26:43.you had ppefiously complaants from behaviour of that member that have

:26:44. > :26:45.bean broufhd behaviour of that member that have

:26:46. > :26:46.been brought to your attention? If so(

:26:47. > :26:50.been brought to your attention? If so, what did you do about it? Don't

:26:51. > :26:53.so( ghat did you do about it? Don't recall complaints made by civil

:26:54. > :26:55.so( ghat did you do about it? Don't servants about the Minister, no. I

:26:56. > :26:56.so( ghat did you do about it? Don't don't know what she means by

:26:57. > :26:59.inap`ropriade don't know what she means by

:27:00. > :26:59.inappropriate behaviour. Order, inappropriade behaviour. Order,

:27:00. > :27:03.order. inappropriade behaviour. Order,

:27:04. > :27:03.or`er. Kipsty inappropriade behaviour. Order,

:27:04. > :27:07.order. Kirsty Williams. First inappropriade behaviour. Order,

:27:08. > :27:08.Minister. You have inappropriade behaviour. Order,

:27:09. > :27:09.Milister. You hate deemed inappropriade behaviour. Order,

:27:10. > :27:09.behaviour of Alun inappropriade behaviour. Order,

:27:10. > :27:12.behaviour of lun Davies inappropriade behaviour. Order,

:27:13. > :27:15.behaviour of Alun Davies today as to be unbecoming of a minister in your

:27:16. > :27:15.behaviour of Alun Davies today as to government

:27:16. > :27:16.behaviour of Alun Davies today as to gotebnment and

:27:17. > :27:17.behaviour of Alun Davies today as to government and I agree with you. And

:27:18. > :27:19.behaviour of Alun Davies today as to I thank ynu for xour apology.

:27:20. > :27:19.behaviour of Alun Davies today as to I thank you for your apology. But,

:27:20. > :27:22.surely, if his behaviour surely, if his bdhaviour as

:27:23. > :27:26.unbecoming of a minister, it is also surely, if his bdhaviour as

:27:27. > :27:29.unbecoming of a member of Welsh unbecominf of a lember nf Welsh

:27:30. > :27:33.Labour. Will you be withdrawing the whip? o.

:27:34. > :27:34.Labour. Will you be withdrawing the whip? No. Since your judgement

:27:35. > :27:36.Labour. Will you be withdrawing the these

:27:37. > :27:37.Labour. Will you be withdrawing the thase issuec

:27:38. > :27:42.Labour. Will you be withdrawing the these issues has been so very

:27:43. > :27:43.flawed, surely now is the time to acce`t

:27:44. > :27:43.flawed, surely now is the time to accept that we

:27:44. > :27:44.flawed, surely now is the time to acce`t that we need

:27:45. > :27:44.flawed, surely now is the time to accept that we need independent

:27:45. > :27:45.pohicing accept that we need independent

:27:46. > :27:48.policing of the ministerial code, accept that we need independent

:27:49. > :27:51.and for the sake of this chamber, for the sake of this

:27:52. > :27:53.and for the sake of this chamber, for the sake of the

:27:54. > :27:55.and for the sake of this chamber, Welsh politics, will you think

:27:56. > :27:57.and for the sake of this chamber, again? No, because the system

:27:58. > :28:00.worked. If it hadn't, the point again? No, because the system

:28:01. > :28:01.wopked. Id at hadn't, the point is again? No, because the system

:28:02. > :28:03.the leader of the Liberal Democrats tha leadep of thd Liberal Democrats

:28:04. > :28:03.makes would be a tha leadep of thd Liberal Democrats

:28:04. > :28:04.makec would be a valid tha leadep of thd Liberal Democrats

:28:05. > :28:04.makes would be a valid one, but the tha leadep of thd Liberal Democrats

:28:05. > :28:06.private office did what it should tha leadep of thd Liberal Democrats

:28:07. > :28:07.do, I was tha leadep of thd Liberal Democrats

:28:08. > :28:07.do( A was made tha leadep of thd Liberal Democrats

:28:08. > :28:09.do, I was made aware, I took the tha leadep of thd Liberal Democrats

:28:10. > :28:12.action I did, and I published tha leadep of thd Liberal Democrats

:28:13. > :28:19.correspondence so that members were coprespondence sn that lembers were

:28:20. > :28:24.aware of what had happened. I have ha`

:28:25. > :28:24.aware of what had happened. I have had apologies from

:28:25. > :28:25.aware of what had happened. I have ha` apologies from the

:28:26. > :28:25.aware of what had happened. I have had apologies from the other

:28:26. > :28:27.leader. We moved question leader. Wd moved question four. Paul

:28:28. > :28:34.Davies. Will the First Minister leader. Wd moved question four. Paul

:28:35. > :28:39.the statement on what was government leader. Wd moved question four. Paul

:28:40. > :28:40.is doing to improve cancer services in West W`les?

:28:41. > :28:42.is doing to improve cancer services in West Wales? Our plans to

:28:43. > :28:43.is doing to improve cancer services cancer services across Wales

:28:44. > :28:43.is doing to improve cancer services calcer sepvaces across Wales are set

:28:44. > :28:47.cancer services across Wales are set out in the cancer delivery plan.

:28:48. > :28:48.cancer services across Wales are set second annual report demonstrates

:28:49. > :28:48.tha second annual report demonstrates

:28:49. > :28:49.the good progress we're second annual report demonstrates

:28:50. > :28:51.tha good progresr we're making, second annual report demonstrates

:28:52. > :28:52.highlighting good practice, like the second annual report demonstrates

:28:53. > :28:58.development 1-stop clinics to speed second annual report demonstrates

:28:59. > :29:02.up cancer waiting times. First Minister, I recently met with the

:29:03. > :29:03.up cancer waiting times. First local branch of prostate Cymru in

:29:04. > :29:05.up cancer waiting times. First Pembrokeshire, they are

:29:06. > :29:08.up cancer waiting times. First raising awareness among the public

:29:09. > :29:12.up cancer waiting times. First of this condition. Prostate cancer

:29:13. > :29:13.is the most prevalent cancer amongst men in

:29:14. > :29:15.is the most prevalent cancer amongst mel in Walec. And screening

:29:16. > :29:16.is the most prevalent cancer amongst men in Wales. And screening for

:29:17. > :29:16.is the most prevalent cancer amongst prostate cancer doesn't happen

:29:17. > :29:20.is the most prevalent cancer amongst prosdate bancer doesn't happen as a

:29:21. > :29:21.matter of course, as it does for cohon

:29:22. > :29:22.matter of course, as it does for colon cancer, for people who have

:29:23. > :29:25.cohon canbeb, fop people who h`ve reached the age of 60. Bearing in

:29:26. > :29:26.mind prostate cancer is the most reached the age of 60. Bearing in

:29:27. > :29:27.prevalent cancer among much reached the age of 60. Bearing in

:29:28. > :29:29.pravalent cancer among luch -- prevalent cancer among luch -- among

:29:30. > :29:31.men in Wales, can he tell us whether prevalent cancer among luch -- among

:29:32. > :29:32.the Welsh government would prevalent cancer among luch -- among

:29:33. > :29:33.willing to look prevalent cancer among luch -- among

:29:34. > :29:34.willang to look at this prevalent cancer among luch -- among

:29:35. > :29:34.willing to look at this important wihlang to look `t this important

:29:35. > :29:37.issue and to consider introducing wihlang to look `t this important

:29:38. > :29:38.guidance hn wihlang to look `t this important

:29:39. > :29:39.guidance in order to ensure wihlang to look `t this important

:29:40. > :29:40.compulsory screening, which I am coipelsory ccreeling, which I `m

:29:41. > :29:41.sure would coipelsory ccreeling, which I `m

:29:42. > :29:41.supe would save lives coipelsory ccreeling, which I `m

:29:42. > :29:48.sure would save lives in the longer coipelsory ccreeling, which I `m

:29:49. > :29:52.term? There is a UK coipelsory ccreeling, which I `m

:29:53. > :29:55.committee that gives guidelines to tha

:29:56. > :29:58.committee that gives guidelines to the UK on prostate cancer and that

:29:59. > :30:00.the EK on pbostate cancer and that doesn't state th`t mandatory

:30:01. > :30:01.the EK on pbostate cancer and that screening should take place at

:30:02. > :30:04.the EK on pbostate cancer and that present. If more

:30:05. > :30:11.present. Hf more evidenbe comes to the fore, we will reconsider. Thank

:30:12. > :30:16.you, presiding officer. Can I screen yoq, preshdang odfacer. Can I rcreen

:30:17. > :30:19.stressed the importance of cancer services across Wales and

:30:20. > :30:23.inpegration? services across Wales and

:30:24. > :30:24.integration? Can they use the inpegration? an t`ey ure the

:30:25. > :30:25.expertise of the inpegration? an t`ey ure the

:30:26. > :30:26.expebtise of the key inpegration? an t`ey ure the

:30:27. > :30:26.expertise of the key centres? inpegration? an t`ey ure the

:30:27. > :30:35.It is inevitable that where there It ic inetidable t`at where thdre

:30:36. > :30:36.are major tertiary centres that the hospitals will work with those

:30:37. > :30:38.centres to ensure that the service centbes to ensure that the service

:30:39. > :30:41.is as strong as it can be. That does centbes to ensure that the service

:30:42. > :30:43.not mean that all these centbes to ensure that the service

:30:44. > :30:50.should be provided in the centre.

:30:51. > :30:51.First Minister, a constituent came to see me yesterdaq

:30:52. > :30:52.First Minister, a constituent came to see me yesterday and the

:30:53. > :30:53.gentleman was suffering with to see me yesterday and the

:30:54. > :30:55.geltleman was sudfering witH cancer. to see me yesterday and the

:30:56. > :31:02.The consultant has suggested treatment with two medications for

:31:03. > :31:03.traadment wath two medications for that constituent but it has been

:31:04. > :31:05.traadment wath two medications for turned down by the local

:31:06. > :31:08.traadment wath two medications for board. Your government is presently

:31:09. > :31:08.conseltinf board. Your government is presently

:31:09. > :31:11.consulting on retaining board. Your government is presently

:31:12. > :31:13.panels with every health board board. Your government is presently

:31:14. > :31:17.take decisions on drugs. How can you board. Your government is presently

:31:18. > :31:17.justafy condinuing board. Your government is presently

:31:18. > :31:19.justify continuing with justify condinuilg with a regime

:31:20. > :31:19.that would allow different panels indifferent

:31:20. > :31:20.that would allow different panels in`ifferelt health

:31:21. > :31:20.that would allow different panels indifferent health boards to

:31:21. > :31:21.that would allow different panels in`ifferelt health boards to take

:31:22. > :31:28.indifferent health boards to take different decisions on cancer drugs

:31:29. > :31:29.indifferent health boards to take and other drugs?

:31:30. > :31:30.an` other dbugs? This is something that we are

:31:31. > :31:33.This is snmethinf that ve are considering at present. We are

:31:34. > :31:34.This is snmethinf that ve are persuaded about having a

:31:35. > :31:35.This is snmethinf that ve are Drugs Fund or April

:31:36. > :31:37.This is snmethinf that ve are Drqgs Fund or Appil that

:31:38. > :31:38.This is snmethinf that ve are Drugs Fund or April that we are --

:31:39. > :31:44.or a pool but we are looking at more consistency.

:31:45. > :31:45.Ara qou ar consistency.

:31:46. > :31:47.Are you as sick as I am with David consistency.

:31:48. > :31:47.Cameron misleadingly talking down Caiebon mhsleadilgly talkang dnwn

:31:48. > :31:51.our health services? Thanks to Welsh Caiebon mhsleadilgly talkang dnwn

:31:52. > :31:53.Labour government investment, more Caiebon mhsleadilgly talkang dnwn

:31:54. > :31:56.cancer treatment is inshde Caiebon mhsleadilgly talkang dnwn

:31:57. > :31:59.cancer treatment is inside the cancer treadment is inshde the

:32:00. > :32:00.target times in Wales and England. Survaval

:32:01. > :32:01.target times in Wales and England. Survival rates are

:32:02. > :32:01.target times in Wales and England. Survaval pates are up.

:32:02. > :32:03.Supvaval pades ape up. Patient satisfaction is up and we have the

:32:04. > :32:04.saticfaction is tp and ve have the only fully

:32:05. > :32:08.onhy fully digital breart screening service in Britain. In West Wales,

:32:09. > :32:10.servace il Britahn. n Vest Wales, cancer services at Withybush are

:32:11. > :32:15.servace il Britahn. n Vest Wales, be maintained and the health board

:32:16. > :32:16.is looking at recruiting an extra oncologist and delivering new mobile

:32:17. > :32:20.is looking at recruiting an extra cancer services. Will you

:32:21. > :32:21.calcer sepvaces. Wall ynu discuss with the health minister what help

:32:22. > :32:22.tha gorst with the health minister what help

:32:23. > :32:26.the worst government can offer to Hywel Dda Health Board to

:32:27. > :32:27.the worst government can offer to deliver those

:32:28. > :32:29.the worst government can offer to There is much to be proud about

:32:30. > :32:29.the worst government can offer to There is luch to be proud aBout in

:32:30. > :32:32.the worst government can offer to the Welsh NHS and what I can say in

:32:33. > :32:34.tha Welsh N@S and what H can s`y in terms of Withybush, which is in

:32:35. > :32:35.tha Welsh N@S and what H can s`y in tepms of Vidhyburh, which is in the

:32:36. > :32:36.tha Welsh N@S and what H can s`y in member's constituency, is that

:32:37. > :32:39.meiber's bonstituency, hs that work is ongoing to design

:32:40. > :32:41.meiber's bonstituency, hs that work chemotherapy unit on site, which

:32:42. > :32:42.wihl chemotherapy unit on site, which

:32:43. > :32:42.will be important for those who need tha

:32:43. > :32:43.will be important for those who need the cervice

:32:44. > :32:46.will be important for those who need the service in future.

:32:47. > :32:48.will be important for those who need Thanc you,

:32:49. > :32:48.will be important for those who need Thank you, presiding officer. Will

:32:49. > :32:49.he make a statement Thank you, presiding officer. Will

:32:50. > :32:50.he make a statemdnt on he make a statement on planning

:32:51. > :32:51.righds he make a statement on planning

:32:52. > :32:57.rights in relation to energy? he make a statement on planning

:32:58. > :32:59.The rush government's priority is to increase low carbon

:33:00. > :33:00.The rush government's priority is to production from renewable sources.

:33:01. > :33:02.The rush government's priority is to We are committed to

:33:03. > :33:03.The rush government's priority is to We abe commatted to facilatating

:33:04. > :33:07.The rush government's priority is to We are committed to facilitating the

:33:08. > :33:07.installation of microgeneration eqqi`ment

:33:08. > :33:09.installation of microgeneration equipment in Wales. We have taken

:33:10. > :33:11.stapc equipment in Wales. We have taken

:33:12. > :33:12.steps to get planning equipment in Wales. We have taken

:33:13. > :33:13.steps to fed plalning pdrmission steps to get planning permission for

:33:14. > :33:20.microscale benewable steps to get planning permission for

:33:21. > :33:21.Wales has no powers in terms of licensing for unconventional gas

:33:22. > :33:23.Wales has no powers in terms of there are those who believe that the

:33:24. > :33:25.planning pights that there are those who believe that the

:33:26. > :33:25.planning rights that we have could possibly,

:33:26. > :33:26.planning rights that we have could possably, if

:33:27. > :33:28.planning rights that we have could possibly, if the government wished,

:33:29. > :33:31.planning rights that we have could more or less lead to a moratorium in

:33:32. > :33:34.planning rights that we have could this area. Are you

:33:35. > :33:35.planning rights that we have could this area, Are ynu with

:33:36. > :33:36.planning rights that we have could this area. Are you with the opinion

:33:37. > :33:37.planning rights that we have could that Wales has the necessary

:33:38. > :33:37.planning pogers that Wales has the necessary

:33:38. > :33:38.planning powers that planning pogers that would allow it

:33:39. > :33:40.to put a moratorium on planning pogers that would allow it

:33:41. > :33:41.developments? planning pogers that would allow it

:33:42. > :33:45.Though. It is extremely important Though. It as extremely important

:33:46. > :33:46.that we have a planning system in Though. It as extremely important

:33:47. > :33:47.Wales that Though. It as extremely important

:33:48. > :33:48.Wahec that gives us Though. It as extremely important

:33:49. > :33:49.Wales that gives us a level in Wahec that gives us a level in Wales

:33:50. > :33:50.that we should have over Wahec that gives us a level in Wales

:33:51. > :33:51.resources. That Wahec that gives us a level in Wales

:33:52. > :33:52.resoerces, That is Wahec that gives us a level in Wales

:33:53. > :33:53.resources. That is not the case Wahec that gives us a level in Wales

:33:54. > :33:56.present. I have seen what the Silk Wahec that gives us a level in Wales

:33:57. > :33:57.Commission has recommended Wahec that gives us a level in Wales

:33:58. > :33:57.Commassiol has recommended for Commission has recommended for the

:33:58. > :34:02.fupube. Commission has recommended for the

:34:03. > :34:03.Will the First Minister outline which specific paragraphs of the

:34:04. > :34:03.Minicterial which specific paragraphs of the

:34:04. > :34:09.Ministerial Code he considers were which specific paragraphs of the

:34:10. > :34:14.breached by the? Sorry, have I which specific paragraphs of the

:34:15. > :34:16.arisen on the wrong question? Yes.

:34:17. > :34:22.I apologise. In that Yes.

:34:23. > :34:22.I apologise. n that care, Yes.

:34:23. > :34:23.I apologise. In that case, I was Yes.

:34:24. > :34:24.going to ask my question Yes.

:34:25. > :34:31.Russell George. Yes.

:34:32. > :34:32.Will the Minister make a statement Yes.

:34:33. > :34:33.on the trunk road network? Yes.

:34:34. > :34:35.We continue our improvements Yes.

:34:36. > :34:35.We continue our hmprovements abross We continte our hmprovements abross

:34:36. > :34:35.all We continte our hmprovements abross

:34:36. > :34:36.alh `arts of We continte our hmprovements abross

:34:37. > :34:36.all parts of Wales. We continte our hmprovements abross

:34:37. > :34:40.A stretch of the A near We continte our hmprovements abross

:34:41. > :34:48.Newtown has been frustrating drivers Newtown h`s been frustratang drivers

:34:49. > :34:51.and passengers. It was finally finished last week, much to the

:34:52. > :34:52.relief of everyole finished last week, much to the

:34:53. > :34:52.relief of everyone who uses rehief of eferyole who tses thd

:34:53. > :34:56.road. hel rehief of eferyole who tses thd

:34:57. > :34:58.road. When I raised the issue of the work with ministers at the

:34:59. > :34:58.road. When I raised the issue of the wopk with ministers at the beginning

:34:59. > :35:00.road. When I raised the issue of the of June, response from

:35:01. > :35:00.road. When I raised the issue of the Minister was

:35:01. > :35:01.road. When I raised the issue of the Minicter vac that the

:35:02. > :35:01.road. When I raised the issue of the Milister vas that the sbhedule

:35:02. > :35:03.road. When I raised the issue of the Minister was that the schedule of

:35:04. > :35:07.work had fallen behind you to a problem with the contractors.

:35:08. > :35:08.problem wit` the contrabtors. The Minister for transport told me in

:35:09. > :35:09.Febreary Minister for transport told me in

:35:10. > :35:09.February that these Minister for transport told me in

:35:10. > :35:09.February that thdse works Minister for transport told me in

:35:10. > :35:10.February that these works were a Minister for transport told me in

:35:11. > :35:11.priority dob Minister for transport told me in

:35:12. > :35:14.priority for the Welsh government. I don'd

:35:15. > :35:17.priority for the Welsh government. I don't believe she or I expected it

:35:18. > :35:19.to take place. What with the problems vidh

:35:20. > :35:20.to take place. What with the problems with the contractors?

:35:21. > :35:21.to take place. What with the Residents are asking me and want to

:35:22. > :35:21.to take place. What with the know as m`nq

:35:22. > :35:24.to take place. What with the know as many days when there is

:35:25. > :35:27.to take place. What with the work takilg place.

:35:28. > :35:28.to take place. What with the The traffic signals were removed

:35:29. > :35:32.to take place. What with the last week and the road was opened.

:35:33. > :35:33.to take place. What with the The works fell behind schedule due

:35:34. > :35:36.to take place. What with the to ground problems with the

:35:37. > :35:38.to take place. What with the contractor. I

:35:39. > :35:39.to take place. What with the coltractop. I am aware

:35:40. > :35:41.to take place. What with the contractor. I am aware that there

:35:42. > :35:42.was an article that suggested we contractor. I am aware that there

:35:43. > :35:44.were let down by the contractor. wepe let dogn by t`e contractor.

:35:45. > :35:48.That is not the case but there were wepe let dogn by t`e contractor.

:35:49. > :35:49.issues with the ground that had to be remedied before work could go

:35:50. > :35:49.issues with the ground that had to ahead.

:35:50. > :35:53.ahaad. Kirsty Williams.

:35:54. > :35:53.ahaad. Kipsdy Willaams. T`e good

:35:54. > :35:55.ahaad. Kirsty Williams. The good news is

:35:56. > :35:57.that the a 40 at Crickhowell is free that the ` $0 at Crickhnwell is free

:35:58. > :35:59.of roadworks for the first time in of roadwopkc for t`e first timd in

:36:00. > :36:08.many months. My constituents of roadwopkc for t`e first timd in

:36:09. > :36:08.commute on the Afor 70 are now contactinf

:36:09. > :36:12.commute on the Afor 70 are now contacting me with delays in

:36:13. > :36:12.commute on the Afor 70 are now Merthyr. I

:36:13. > :36:12.commute on the Afor 70 are now Mert`yr. I am

:36:13. > :36:13.commute on the Afor 70 are now Merthyr. I am sure the new

:36:14. > :36:13.commute on the Afor 70 are now Mert`yr. I am supe the new retail

:36:14. > :36:15.Merthyr. I am sure the new retail unit will be welcomed by everybody

:36:16. > :36:17.when it is unit will be welcomed by everybody

:36:18. > :36:17.whan it is opened but there unit will be welcomed by everybody

:36:18. > :36:18.significant cues in the morning unit will be welcomed by everybody

:36:19. > :36:19.signaficant cues in the morning and unit will be welcomed by everybody

:36:20. > :36:20.evening for people travelling south unit will be welcomed by everybody

:36:21. > :36:25.and north on the road. When will the an` north on the road. Vhen will the

:36:26. > :36:26.work be completed? an` north on the road. Vhen will the

:36:27. > :36:28.I can't give a date as to when I can't ghve a d`te as to when that

:36:29. > :36:30.work will be completed. I will write I can't ghve a d`te as to when that

:36:31. > :36:31.to t`e I can't ghve a d`te as to when that

:36:32. > :36:35.to the member with further updates to t`e member with further upd`tes

:36:36. > :36:37.as to when and the schedule. Quasdion

:36:38. > :36:42.as to when and the schedule. Question seven, Antoinette Sandbach.

:36:43. > :36:43.as to when and the schedule. Minister, can you answer the

:36:44. > :36:43.as to when and the schedule. question on the

:36:44. > :36:44.as to when and the schedule. quasdion nn the paper

:36:45. > :36:44.as to when and the schedule. question on the paper that was asked

:36:45. > :36:44.quasdion nn the paper that was asked earlier

:36:45. > :36:46.quasdion nn the paper that was asked earlaer ol?

:36:47. > :36:47.quasdion nn the paper that was asked I think I have dealt with this in

:36:48. > :36:51.previous exchanges. prevaous dxchangds.

:36:52. > :36:51.Actually, First Minister, you haven't.

:36:52. > :36:53.Actually, First Minister, you haten't. Xoe haven't

:36:54. > :36:54.Actually, First Minister, you haven't. You haven't possess

:36:55. > :36:54.Actually, First Minister, you haten't. Xoe haven't possess to

:36:55. > :36:55.haven't. You haven't possess to fighd which paragraphs

:36:56. > :36:57.haven't. You haven't possess to fight which paragraphs of the

:36:58. > :36:58.haven't. You haven't possess to you say were breached and you

:36:59. > :37:02.haven't. You haven't possess to happy to ignore. You have talked

:37:03. > :37:02.aboud happy to ignore. You have talked

:37:03. > :37:05.about the precautionary nature of happy to ignore. You have talked

:37:06. > :37:06.the advice but in happy to ignore. You have talked

:37:07. > :37:07.the advice but il paragraph happy to ignore. You have talked

:37:08. > :37:09.the advice but in paragraph 38 happy to ignore. You have talked

:37:10. > :37:12.the advice but il paragraph 38 of the Jones report, it said, if

:37:13. > :37:13.followed, id the Jones report, it said, if

:37:14. > :37:15.followed, it would protect the integrity of the recess in a

:37:16. > :37:19.followed, it would protect the controversial case.

:37:20. > :37:22.coltroversial care. herefore, clearly, do you accept that by

:37:23. > :37:23.saying it was so precautionary clearly, do you accept that by

:37:24. > :37:27.the Minister didn't need to follow the Ministeb didl't need to follow

:37:28. > :37:30.it, follow the advice provided the Ministeb didl't need to follow

:37:31. > :37:32.him on the 28th of March that he the Ministeb didl't need to follow

:37:33. > :37:35.should not comment on the the Ministeb didl't need to follow

:37:36. > :37:39.even in hhs the Ministeb didl't need to follow

:37:40. > :37:42.even in his AM capacity, that were prepared to compromise the integrity

:37:43. > :37:42.even in his AM capacity, that were the process in a

:37:43. > :37:45.case? case?

:37:46. > :37:47.I don't accept case?

:37:48. > :37:48.I `on't abcept that case?

:37:49. > :37:48.I don't accept that the issue case?

:37:49. > :37:52.been compromised in any way. It is case?

:37:53. > :37:55.open to ministers to represent case?

:37:56. > :37:55.constituents with case?

:37:56. > :37:57.guidelines. I found the advice went case?

:37:58. > :38:01.beyond what was already in case?

:38:02. > :38:03.Ministerial Code but nevertheless, anot`er

:38:04. > :38:04.Ministerial Code but nevertheless, another issue has come to light

:38:05. > :38:06.another issee har come to light this week to my knowledge and I have

:38:07. > :38:10.another issee har come to light this taken the appropriate

:38:11. > :38:12.taken the a`proppiate abtaon. Thank you, presiding officer. Since

:38:13. > :38:15.taken the a`proppiate abtaon. the publication of that report last

:38:16. > :38:17.taken the a`proppiate abtaon. week, the events today show that it

:38:18. > :38:18.taken the a`proppiate abtaon. was a habit

:38:19. > :38:19.taken the a`proppiate abtaon. was a habht of the remaining

:38:20. > :38:25.taken the a`proppiate abtaon. Minister to put Russia on officials

:38:26. > :38:26.fohlowing Minister to put Russia on officials

:38:27. > :38:26.following sending e-mails, which Minister to put Russia on officials

:38:27. > :38:31.throws light on the Derek Jones Minister to put Russia on officials

:38:32. > :38:34.report and the content of those e-iaals.

:38:35. > :38:37.report and the content of those I asked you whether you still has

:38:38. > :38:38.report and the content of those confidence in your Minister. We now

:38:39. > :38:43.know that six hours before I ask confidence in your Minister. We now

:38:44. > :38:44.that question he had sent an e-mail asking for personal information

:38:45. > :38:44.aboud fivd members in asking for personal information

:38:45. > :38:49.about five members in this asking for personal information

:38:50. > :38:51.When was your office of aware of asking for personal information

:38:52. > :38:54.e-mail asking for personal information

:38:55. > :38:54.e-maal selt asking for personal information

:38:55. > :38:55.e-mail sent by Aled Davies and when asking for personal information

:38:56. > :38:57.did you come to a decision that you asking for personal information

:38:58. > :38:58.no longer had confidence asking for personal information

:38:59. > :38:58.no longer had colfadence in asking for personal information

:38:59. > :38:59.no longer had confidence in him? no longer had colfadence an him?

:39:00. > :39:00.Well, no longer had colfadence an him?

:39:01. > :39:00.Wehl, no longer had colfadence an him?

:39:01. > :39:02.Well, I knew about the no longer had colfadence an him?

:39:03. > :39:02.Wehl, I kleg about the e-mail on Well, I knew about the e-mail on

:39:03. > :39:05.Friday morning, when Well, I knew about the e-mail on

:39:06. > :39:05.Friday mornang, when I was Well, I knew about the e-mail on

:39:06. > :39:12.Friday morning, when I was running Well, I knew about the e-mail on

:39:13. > :39:12.from the permanent Secretary's office. I saw the

:39:13. > :39:13.from the permanent Secretary's office. I saw thd e-mail

:39:14. > :39:13.from the permanent Secretary's office. I saw the e-mail yesterday.

:39:14. > :39:16.from the permanent Secretary's I wanted to hear what the Minister

:39:17. > :39:18.I wanted to hear w`at the Minister had to say about it this morning and

:39:19. > :39:21.had do sax about it this morning and then I took the decision.

:39:22. > :39:22.Minicter, then I took the decision.

:39:23. > :39:23.Minister, when then I took the decision.

:39:24. > :39:23.Minicter, w`en ynu heard from the then I took the decision.

:39:24. > :39:27.former minister, did he give an then I took the decision.

:39:28. > :39:29.explanation as to what he intended to do with the information that he

:39:30. > :39:33.to do with dhe ilformation that he requested on those five members?

:39:34. > :39:35.to do with dhe ilformation that he I'm not going to go into

:39:36. > :39:36.to do with dhe ilformation that he I'i not gning to go into detail

:39:37. > :39:36.to do with dhe ilformation that he I'm not going to go into detail in

:39:37. > :39:39.terms of the conversation but my I'm not going to go into detail in

:39:40. > :39:42.view was that the impression was given that the

:39:43. > :39:42.view was that the impression was requested in orddr

:39:43. > :39:43.view was that the impression was requested in order for that

:39:44. > :39:44.information to be used in the cause infobmation to bd used hn the bause

:39:45. > :39:47.of questions. I thought that was infobmation to bd used hn the bause

:39:48. > :39:47.of questionc. I thought t`at was the infobmation to bd used hn the bause

:39:48. > :39:48.view that infobmation to bd used hn the bause

:39:49. > :39:48.viaw that most mdmbers vould infobmation to bd used hn the bause

:39:49. > :39:48.view that most members would take. infobmation to bd used hn the bause

:39:49. > :39:51.Therefore id was no infobmation to bd used hn the bause

:39:52. > :39:51.Therefore it was no longer tenable for

:39:52. > :39:51.Therefore it was no longer tenable fop dhe

:39:52. > :39:57.Therefore it was no longer tenable for the Minister to remain in post.

:39:58. > :39:58.Well for the Minister to remain in post.

:39:59. > :39:58.Wehl the for the Minister to remain in post.

:39:59. > :39:59.Well the First Minister make a Wehl the Fibst Minaster make a

:40:00. > :40:01.statement on powers to make Wehl the Fibst Minaster make a

:40:02. > :40:04.compulsory purchases compelsory `urch`ses in Wales?

:40:05. > :40:04.They are an important tool for bo`ies

:40:05. > :40:06.They are an important tool for bodies to use and the means of

:40:07. > :40:07.assembling bodies to use and the means of

:40:08. > :40:08.assemblinf the land needed bodies to use and the means of

:40:09. > :40:09.assembling the land needed to bodies to use and the means of

:40:10. > :40:14.dehifer improvements in Wales. bodies to use and the means of

:40:15. > :40:15.I would like to thank the First Minister. Ad a pnlacy

:40:16. > :40:19.I would like to thank the First Minister. At a policy forum on

:40:20. > :40:20.I would like to thank the First infrastructure last week, Professor

:40:21. > :40:26.I would like to thank the First Brian Morgan expressed some concern

:40:27. > :40:27.Brian organ exppessed rome concern about the Welsh

:40:28. > :40:28.Brian organ exppessed rome concern aboud the Welsh fovernment's reduced

:40:29. > :40:32.Brian organ exppessed rome concern capacity to exercise compulsory

:40:33. > :40:34.purc`ases capacity to exercise compulsory

:40:35. > :40:36.purchases because of the consequence of the abolition of the

:40:37. > :40:39.purchases because of the consequence authority for Wales back in 1999. He

:40:40. > :40:42.ciped authority for Wales back in 1999. He

:40:43. > :40:44.cited that is an impediment for regressing session regeneration

:40:45. > :40:46.cited that is an impediment for projects. Do you share any

:40:47. > :40:48.projects. Do you s`are `nq of his concern in this regard

:40:49. > :40:49.projects. Do you s`are `nq of his concern il dhis pegard is

:40:50. > :40:49.projects. Do you s`are `nq of his concern in this regard is Mac and

:40:50. > :40:49.wihl concern in this regard is Mac and

:40:50. > :40:54.will you undertake to will you tndertaje to consider

:40:55. > :40:55.reviewing the frequency with which Wehs`

:40:56. > :40:55.reviewing the frequency with which Wels` govdrnment

:40:56. > :40:58.reviewing the frequency with which compulsory purchase to advance

:40:59. > :41:01.regeneration? I don't think that is the

:41:02. > :41:04.regeneration? I don't think th`t is the correct

:41:05. > :41:05.regeneration? view. CPO is available to

:41:06. > :41:13.view. PO ic avahlable to us through the WDA act. That is specifically in

:41:14. > :41:14.view. PO ic avahlable to us through relation to enviponmental

:41:15. > :41:15.relation to environmental improvemelt so I don't see

:41:16. > :41:15.relation to environmental improvement so I don't see that the

:41:16. > :41:18.relation to environmental situation has changed, given the

:41:19. > :41:23.relation to environmental powers we have always had.

:41:24. > :41:25.Byron Davies. powers we have always had.

:41:26. > :41:27.First Minister, powers we have always had.

:41:28. > :41:28.Firsd Minister, leading powers we have always had.

:41:29. > :41:28.Firsd inhsder, leading on powers we have always had.

:41:29. > :41:31.First Minister, leading on from that, I have been working with

:41:32. > :41:32.First Minister, leading on from organisations and scrutinising the

:41:33. > :41:35.organisations and scrutinasing the limitation of the

:41:36. > :41:35.organisations and scrutinasing the liiidatiol of thd activd travel

:41:36. > :41:35.limitation of the active travel though. There

:41:36. > :41:36.limitation of the active travel though. Thebe are

:41:37. > :41:36.limitation of the active travel though. There are concerns that the

:41:37. > :41:39.limitation of the active travel current framework for compulsory

:41:40. > :41:39.purchase current framework for compulsory

:41:40. > :41:39.purc`ase nrders current framework for compulsory

:41:40. > :41:41.purchase orders as a last resort current framework for compulsory

:41:42. > :41:41.nop cit well current framework for compulsory

:41:42. > :41:45.not sit well together. There is not cit well togdt`er. There is

:41:46. > :41:45.scope to explore not cit well togdt`er. There is

:41:46. > :41:46.scope to ex`lore this not cit well togdt`er. There is

:41:47. > :41:46.scope to explore this issue further an`

:41:47. > :41:47.scope to explore this issue further and I would welcome your commitment

:41:48. > :41:51.an` A would welcome your commitment to explore the CPO 's guidance to

:41:52. > :41:53.tha planning to explore the CPO 's guidance to

:41:54. > :41:55.the planning Inspectorate that sits alongside to meet the needs of the

:41:56. > :41:55.active Wales travel alongside to meet the needs of the

:41:56. > :41:58.acpife Walec tratel act. active Wales travel act.

:41:59. > :41:59.I didn't quite hear what active Wales travel act.

:42:00. > :42:00.I didn't puate hdar what the active Wales travel act.

:42:01. > :42:07.I didn't quite hear what the member said but H dhink he was suggesting

:42:08. > :42:10.that compulsory purchase should be considered. I the that is true. --

:42:11. > :42:11.that compulsory purchase should be colsadered. I thd that is true. -- I

:42:12. > :42:13.consadered. I thd that hs true. -- I agree with that.

:42:14. > :42:17.consadered. I thd that hs true. -- I agree with dhat. I think local

:42:18. > :42:18.consadered. I thd that hs true. -- I authorities shouldn't be afraid if

:42:19. > :42:22.consadered. I thd that hs true. -- I it is the correct thing to do.

:42:23. > :42:26.First Minister, do you believe that it is the correct thing to do.

:42:27. > :42:31.those three purchase is being implemented consistently

:42:32. > :42:32.implemented conshstently acrosr Wales or are

:42:33. > :42:33.Wahec or `re local authnraties taking

:42:34. > :42:37.Wahec or `re local authnraties certain areas? And will you consider

:42:38. > :42:38.Wahec or `re local authnraties with any reorganisation of local

:42:39. > :42:41.government that there should be a with any reorganisation of local

:42:42. > :42:41.more consistent with any reorganisation of local

:42:42. > :42:42.more conshstent rystem with any reorganisation of local

:42:43. > :42:42.more consistent system in terms of with any reorganisation of local

:42:43. > :42:43.using compulsory purchase? using compulsory purchare?

:42:44. > :42:48.There is no evidence of consistent There is lo eviddnce of consistent

:42:49. > :42:50.use. I don't know of any situation use. I dol'd know of anx situation

:42:51. > :42:54.where there is a lack of consistenCy where there is a lack of consistency

:42:55. > :42:57.bepween where there is a lack of consistency

:42:58. > :42:57.between local authorities in Wales. Thay

:42:58. > :42:58.between local authorities in Wales. They all have to act under the

:42:59. > :43:02.Thay all hafe to act under the same legal framework. If there is any

:43:03. > :43:04.evidence that demonstrates the problem with consistency than

:43:05. > :43:07.problem wit` conristency than H would be willing to look at it.

:43:08. > :43:11.woqld be villing to look at it. Julie Morgan. What plans to the

:43:12. > :43:11.Firsd Julie Morgan. What plans to the

:43:12. > :43:11.Fipsd Minisder Julie Morgan. What plans to the

:43:12. > :43:12.First Minister have to Julie Morgan. What plans to the

:43:13. > :43:12.services Julie Morgan. What plans to the

:43:13. > :43:13.servaces dor Julie Morgan. What plans to the

:43:14. > :43:16.services for children and young people with disabilities?

:43:17. > :43:17.By legislative programme continues By legislatave ppogrammd continues

:43:18. > :43:22.to drive improvement for children By legislatave ppogrammd continues

:43:23. > :43:23.and young people with disabilities. ?2.6 million

:43:24. > :43:26.and young people with disabilities. ?2,6 million is the

:43:27. > :43:27.and young people with disabilities. ?2.6 million is the target and the

:43:28. > :43:29.and young people with disabilities. family trust fund.

:43:30. > :43:30.and young people with disabilities. family trusd fund. Families first

:43:31. > :43:34.and young people with disabilities. contains funding for families

:43:35. > :43:38.affected. We leave First Minister's

:43:39. > :43:39.affected. there but remember you can see more

:43:40. > :43:50.affected. coverage online. You can get updates

:43:51. > :43:54.affected. on reaction to the sackhng of

:43:55. > :43:58.affected. across our outlets on TV and radio.

:43:59. > :44:00.affected. We will be back next Tuesday

:44:01. > :44:11.affected. 1:40pm.