:00:09. > :00:14.Good evening from Bristol. Tonight we put two party leaders to the test
:00:15. > :00:39.in an election questions special. Welcome to the studios here in
:00:40. > :00:43.Bristol. Last night, another shocking attack on the streets of
:00:44. > :00:47.the capital, only a week after a terrorist attack in Manchester.
:00:48. > :00:51.Today the normal rules that guide general election campaigning were
:00:52. > :00:57.put on hold. This evening that campaign was resumed. Tonight you
:00:58. > :01:01.going to hear from the co-leader of the Green Party, Jonathan Barkley
:01:02. > :01:07.and the leader of the United Kingdom Independence party, Paul Nuttall. We
:01:08. > :01:18.will hear from him in a moment. There is a welcome Jonathan Bartley
:01:19. > :01:22.from the Green Party. Welcome to the programme. In the light of the
:01:23. > :01:28.tragic events last night, Theresa May held a special security meeting,
:01:29. > :01:33.COBRA at Downing Street. She said the country needs to change its take
:01:34. > :01:47.on the way it deals with extremism and tackles terrorism. Do agree with
:01:48. > :01:50.that? I will answer that. My thoughts are very much with those
:01:51. > :02:06.who were hurt or killed and their last night.
:02:07. > :02:11.Paid tribute to the emergency services who did amazing work last
:02:12. > :02:13.night. I watched what Therese May said. I think she is right to call
:02:14. > :02:15.for a review. I think that review needs two very important aspects.
:02:16. > :02:20.The first is the Prevent strategy. We have seen some success. The
:02:21. > :02:28.Government has been pursuing it for several years for them it is toxic
:02:29. > :02:32.for some communities and alienate some communities. Not getting to the
:02:33. > :02:39.root of the radicalisation. I want her to look at policing. We have
:02:40. > :02:45.seen 20,000 police officers last. It is not just about police numbers, it
:02:46. > :02:50.is about the way we police. I am chair of a panel which sets
:02:51. > :02:54.priorities for local policing. Police cannot be in every place at
:02:55. > :02:58.every moment. They require policing by consent and to work with the
:02:59. > :03:04.community they need intelligence from the community and I want to see
:03:05. > :03:10.that front and centre in the review that Theresa May conducts. You
:03:11. > :03:16.called the Prevent strategy xenophobia. Why is that? For those
:03:17. > :03:20.who are trying to tarnish the Muslim community with these atrocities,
:03:21. > :03:29.this was not down to the Muslim community. This was a perversion of
:03:30. > :03:39.Islam. With the toxic... I am sorry you are saying rubbish, I disagree
:03:40. > :03:43.with you. It is alienating the very communities we need to be building
:03:44. > :03:48.bridges with. Think of yourself, maybe have a family member you are
:03:49. > :03:52.worried with the risk of radicalisation. Do you trust the
:03:53. > :03:57.authorities and trusts the strategy? Are you going to bring this to the
:03:58. > :04:03.attention of the authorities? Extremism is complex and radicalism
:04:04. > :04:08.is complex. It is not a clear answer as to why people become radicalised.
:04:09. > :04:17.It happens in many ways. Therese are made talked about changing our whole
:04:18. > :04:30.strategy. Following last by's terrorist attack, do we need to be
:04:31. > :04:34.armed to protect our -- ourselves? It is good that the Prime Minister
:04:35. > :04:39.has started to talk about reviewing the strategy. We have armed police
:04:40. > :04:43.officers on the street. The question we will have to face, we will elect
:04:44. > :04:46.a parliament and government to address these issues about whether
:04:47. > :04:51.we need armed police officers further. Let's see what comes out of
:04:52. > :04:56.the review. I know the police responded very quickly in this
:04:57. > :05:01.particular example. My instinct is not to arm all our police. Let's see
:05:02. > :05:07.what happens. Does anybody want to come in on the back of what Jonathan
:05:08. > :05:16.has just said in response to what he calls no knee jerk reaction? I don't
:05:17. > :05:20.think it is a knee jerk reaction. Two years ago, the BBC carried out
:05:21. > :05:26.the survey of Muslims in this country. It found that 26% of
:05:27. > :05:31.Muslims in this country support the terrorist attacks in Europe and this
:05:32. > :05:36.country and they hold our own democracy in contempt. It needs to
:05:37. > :05:40.be sorted. I am not familiar with that survey. There are some
:05:41. > :05:44.liberties and freedoms in this country which I am absolutely
:05:45. > :05:52.passionate about protecting. I think it is what the terrorists want to do
:05:53. > :05:55.away with, what they want to attack. When it comes to having a knee jerk
:05:56. > :06:00.reaction to clamp down on Civil Liberties, we have just seen Donald
:06:01. > :06:03.Trump elected in America. It is not impossible we could have somebody
:06:04. > :06:10.like that in this country. What they do with powers to clamp down on
:06:11. > :06:14.Civil Liberties? Why has the Green Party not supported the terrorist
:06:15. > :06:19.legislation that has been put forward by the Government over the
:06:20. > :06:22.years? We are very much about scrutinising the Government plans
:06:23. > :06:28.full stop the job of Green MPs is to scrutinise what the Government is
:06:29. > :06:36.doing. That is what we have done. When you have groups like Liberty
:06:37. > :06:39.and the national -- National union of teachers coming forward, you have
:06:40. > :06:44.to listen to them. Let's listen to the people who are working at the
:06:45. > :06:48.coal face, let's be led by them and represent them in Parliament. So,
:06:49. > :06:55.you wouldn't be in favour of taking away the safe spaces on the
:06:56. > :07:02.internets for extremists to publish their hateful ideology? There are
:07:03. > :07:07.two issues about technology. Politicians do not really know much
:07:08. > :07:13.about and I include myself in that. I think we need to be calling
:07:14. > :07:17.providers of services, they call themselves platforms, like Facebook.
:07:18. > :07:21.They are also publishers and we need to be calling them to account. The
:07:22. > :07:28.details of what they have taken down and when they have taken it down.
:07:29. > :07:34.Theresa May flag this in her speech. What this gentleman said, the 26% of
:07:35. > :07:41.Muslims agreeing, that is a large amount of people are getting bigger
:07:42. > :07:47.by the minute. Within 20 to 25 years, people will be shocked at
:07:48. > :07:51.what I will say but Muslim will be the majority population in this
:07:52. > :07:57.country. We have two children and they have ten. You are making a lot
:07:58. > :08:01.of assumptions. This is a perversion of Islam. It is not a problem that
:08:02. > :08:10.Muslims have to deal with, it is a problem we all have to deal with. I
:08:11. > :08:15.live in an area that is diverse. I live close to two mosques. I have
:08:16. > :08:20.talked to the people in the mosques. They hate what happened last night
:08:21. > :08:28.as much as I do. I worry for their children as much as I worry for my
:08:29. > :08:33.children. You still have 26% of Muslims who do agree with Isis and
:08:34. > :08:38.killing British people. I do not accept that. Let's take another
:08:39. > :08:45.point from the lady in the front row. First and foremost I completely
:08:46. > :08:50.and sincerely empathise with people's ear of terrorism.
:08:51. > :08:55.Irrespective of religion and ethnicity. However, acts of
:08:56. > :08:59.violence, terrorism and crime are not something that is restricted to
:09:00. > :09:06.religion. There is truth is that Isis is indoctrinating lone criminal
:09:07. > :09:10.people in a way that is affecting our society now but it is dangerous
:09:11. > :09:20.to apply a rigid framework just to one religion when in Norway, future
:09:21. > :09:29.politicians were murdered and no one called that terrorism because his
:09:30. > :09:35.skin was white. Thank you very much for making that point. One in four
:09:36. > :09:48.referrals through counterterrorism procedures is from far right terror.
:09:49. > :09:54.Do you consider the murder of Joe Cox MP as a terrorism incident? I
:09:55. > :10:01.would. -- Jo Cox. I am interested in your problem in Saudi Arabia and the
:10:02. > :10:09.close ties behind the Saudi government and our arms sales.
:10:10. > :10:15.Foreign policy has been raised by Jeremy Corbyn. We need to take that
:10:16. > :10:22.into account. The Green Party would end commercial arms sales with Saudi
:10:23. > :10:26.Arabia. The Green Party has also been against pretty well every
:10:27. > :10:31.foreign intervention. You would not support the idea of a drone taking
:10:32. > :10:38.out an extremist jihadi and even if they work abroad. You have to take
:10:39. > :10:43.every case on a case-by-case basis. Let's not pretend those decisions
:10:44. > :10:48.happen in isolation. They do not. They have consequences far beyond
:10:49. > :10:54.that particular act. You must take these things very seriously. You
:10:55. > :11:02.would not support it. It depends on the situation. The next question,
:11:03. > :11:06.will walk. Your party is proposing a four day working week. What evidence
:11:07. > :11:12.do have this will benefit the economy? This is a great question.
:11:13. > :11:16.It is one of the big issues we need to talk about. It is very short
:11:17. > :11:21.term. What will happen with automation which will take away
:11:22. > :11:25.millions of jobs? We work and there will be people here watching this
:11:26. > :11:29.programme at home with a rising feeling in their stomach right now
:11:30. > :11:35.they will have to go into work tomorrow morning, on Monday. You
:11:36. > :11:39.might not have that under a green government. You have people like
:11:40. > :11:45.Amazon already talking about doing it and France dropping to a 35 hour
:11:46. > :11:49.week. Others are talking about flexible working. 100 years ago
:11:50. > :11:54.Gerald Ford said, let's have a five-day week and not a sixth day
:11:55. > :12:01.week. Not Gerald Ford the president, Henry Ford. If it is going to be
:12:02. > :12:05.phased in a long time, what are you talking about, 100 years? We need a
:12:06. > :12:09.bigger conversation about the economy for that lets move it as
:12:10. > :12:14.quickly as we cancelled if you have companies pointing out we have the
:12:15. > :12:18.lowest productivity in Europe, we work the longest hours. We are
:12:19. > :12:23.racking up a huge bill for the NHS. It does not have to be like this.
:12:24. > :12:31.That's have that conversation and see what we can do. Who fancies a
:12:32. > :12:36.four day week? Do you people in the audience think it is affordable? The
:12:37. > :12:40.point you are saying about automation. This started 30 years
:12:41. > :12:46.ago. When I started work they were typing pools with 20 women.
:12:47. > :12:53.Narrative is done on a word processor. Now you cannot create any
:12:54. > :12:57.more jobs. Jobs are being taken by technology. Robots build most of the
:12:58. > :13:04.cars. Can you tell me where these jobs are supposed to be coming from
:13:05. > :13:11.in the future? That is the point. A few more comments from the audience.
:13:12. > :13:15.Do you think universal Basic income would be a potential route forward?
:13:16. > :13:21.To have Sony people applauding that question seems like the idea is
:13:22. > :13:27.getting through. -- so many people. It is about having a rejig of the
:13:28. > :13:31.welfare state. It was set up under a very different set of assumptions.
:13:32. > :13:35.We are seeing an attack on the welfare state by the Government and,
:13:36. > :13:40.on the other side, it is not fit for purpose because of the assumptions
:13:41. > :13:44.it was based on. A lot of people are using food banks because of problems
:13:45. > :13:50.with benefits. It depends how much progressive taxation you want. Who
:13:51. > :13:55.would be paying for this? At the moment it would be a rejig of the
:13:56. > :14:01.welfare state. We want a pilot. In other countries they are starting to
:14:02. > :14:06.pilot these things. In Ontario, they are working it out. Iain
:14:07. > :14:09.Duncan-Smith started to amalgamate six benefits in Universal Credit. It
:14:10. > :14:11.is a big thing to do. You work out how it is affordable and then well
:14:12. > :14:21.-- roll it out. The backbone of this country is
:14:22. > :14:24.small businesses, who will compensate business owners for
:14:25. > :14:30.having to pay the same wages, with less productivity? The idea is you
:14:31. > :14:34.get more productivity per worker when you do not work such long hours
:14:35. > :14:39.and that is why companies think this might be a good thing. There is a
:14:40. > :14:43.bigger question, 30 years ago when I was growing up, not so long ago! We
:14:44. > :14:48.were told we would have technical advances, huge wealth created, we
:14:49. > :14:52.would work fewer hours and enjoy time with our family. We have had
:14:53. > :14:59.that wealth and automation and instead, growing inequality. It does
:15:00. > :15:04.not have to be that way! How do you explain the high levels of
:15:05. > :15:09.employment? There are criticisms that it might not be the right kind
:15:10. > :15:13.of employment, you saying high levels of employment not desirable
:15:14. > :15:18.because that is we have? Look at the kind of employment many of us
:15:19. > :15:23.experience at the moment. Zero-hours contracts, low wages, insecure
:15:24. > :15:29.employment and access to tribunal is taken away, we cannot afford the
:15:30. > :15:33.fees. And the context of Brexit, this Government could potentially
:15:34. > :15:39.use it as an opportunity to wage a fresh assault on workers' rights.
:15:40. > :15:44.This is a new age of insecurity and we have to do something different.
:15:45. > :15:47.There is the money, but it is in the wrong hands and it takes the
:15:48. > :15:54.political will to make it happen. Any more reaction from the audience?
:15:55. > :15:57.This gentleman. The 35 hour week in France has been in force for some
:15:58. > :16:05.years and the new President Emmanuel Macron wants to stop it, why do you
:16:06. > :16:09.think it would be successful here? I am not familiar with what Macron
:16:10. > :16:13.said about the 35 hour working week and his reasons for it. The idea of
:16:14. > :16:19.the working week being shorter is there is a lot of wealth, we have
:16:20. > :16:24.not seen in this room enough, we have big corporations making excess
:16:25. > :16:28.profit and eight of and cutting corporation tax lower and lower and
:16:29. > :16:32.we are not seeing the benefits. We can be better and we can transition
:16:33. > :16:35.the economy to create good jobs and the Green Party is saying we need is
:16:36. > :16:40.to transition the economy down to more resilient local economies and
:16:41. > :16:45.keep money flowing rather than being sucked out by the big
:16:46. > :16:48.multinationals. When you spend ?1 and an independent shop, the
:16:49. > :16:52.majority of that money stays in the local economy, if it goes to a chain
:16:53. > :16:57.store, it leaves it. It makes sense to encourage local economies that
:16:58. > :17:04.resilient and globalisation, absolutely. You mention creating
:17:05. > :17:10.good jobs and will want that, what is the Green Party going to do to
:17:11. > :17:14.create good jobs? How is a four day working week going to create good
:17:15. > :17:17.jobs? It is all very well to say you would like these things in
:17:18. > :17:22.opposition, what are you going to do? Good question, we have plans to
:17:23. > :17:28.create 1 million more jobs and that comes from renewable energy
:17:29. > :17:34.revolution, a green strategy. We can generate over six times our annual
:17:35. > :17:39.electricity consumption just from offshore renewables. We are about to
:17:40. > :17:46.put and the Labour Party supports it and the Government, a subsidy into
:17:47. > :17:49.him clean nuclear power that would generate 800 jobs. You take that
:17:50. > :17:54.subsidy and you put it into renewable energy revolution and you
:17:55. > :17:57.rejuvenate the UK coastline and we generate jobs and that is the way to
:17:58. > :18:02.spend money. You would need a five-day working week to do that? If
:18:03. > :18:08.you have more jobs and productivity, why? Why not push the minimum wage
:18:09. > :18:14.to a living wage standard? We can afford this. This business in favour
:18:15. > :18:17.of putting it up further? You get savings from a living wage because
:18:18. > :18:22.you get less in work in fits to pay out and you get an increase in
:18:23. > :18:28.National Insurance and that money can support businesses. The next
:18:29. > :18:34.question, can we go to Mitchell? You just mentioned and I saw it on your
:18:35. > :18:38.manifesto that you wanted to end subsidies for nuclear power. That
:18:39. > :18:43.does not contribute to climate change, so how can you justify
:18:44. > :18:47.wanting to be green when we have got pretty much a perfect solution where
:18:48. > :18:51.it generates huge amounts of power with little damage to the
:18:52. > :18:55.environment? It is not really a perfect solution. You think about
:18:56. > :19:00.the massive investment and it is locking this into a deal at a price
:19:01. > :19:05.that is already more expensive than offshore wind. It is centralised and
:19:06. > :19:08.it keeps control in a very small place and security ways, it makes is
:19:09. > :19:15.quite vulnerable. We could decentralise the supply. In my local
:19:16. > :19:21.community in Brixton, you had a community project when local people
:19:22. > :19:26.invest with low interest rates and they get a return of 5%, you have
:19:27. > :19:30.solar panels on a housing estate to generate clean energy which goes
:19:31. > :19:33.back into local community and the profits go towards installation and
:19:34. > :19:37.cutting fuel poverty, that makes sense and why not rule it out around
:19:38. > :19:44.the UK? That is the kind of thing we can do. Because it will keep the
:19:45. > :19:48.lights on, people will argue. Any questions on nuclear energy and
:19:49. > :19:51.renewables? One of the biggest problems is that energy bills are
:19:52. > :19:55.going up and voters do not like green subsidies on their bills,
:19:56. > :20:01.how'd you tell people that is why in part their bills have gone up? That
:20:02. > :20:05.is a lie from the pit of hell! If you look at the fossil fuel
:20:06. > :20:11.subsidies, ?6 billion subsidised by this Government, look at the Big Six
:20:12. > :20:14.energy companies. Every time the wholesale energy price goes up, they
:20:15. > :20:18.put up their prices, it goes down and they do not drop their prices
:20:19. > :20:22.nearly enough. We were told privatisation would cut our bills,
:20:23. > :20:26.it has not delivered, it is time to bring them back into public
:20:27. > :20:34.ownership. Anybody wanting to respond in that? Did you want to
:20:35. > :20:39.comment? Yes, it you say it is cheap to go renewable, but is it anywhere
:20:40. > :20:44.near as reliable as something like nuclear power? The amounts of power
:20:45. > :20:48.we need for modern-day society, we cannot ask everybody to change their
:20:49. > :20:53.lives, when it stops being windy and we do not get wind power and when it
:20:54. > :20:59.is not sunny, we do not get solar. But it always works and it is safe.
:21:00. > :21:03.With the greatest respect, that is considered a 20th-century oddments.
:21:04. > :21:06.We have the ball running the National Grid saying every house and
:21:07. > :21:14.community and be a powerhouse. I went to visit Cardiff pay to look at
:21:15. > :21:19.use of Cardiff Bay to hold back the water and drop it at the time you
:21:20. > :21:22.need the electricity supply. Six up the West Coast could generate as
:21:23. > :21:26.much power as Hinkley and that is the capacity we could develop. It
:21:27. > :21:33.does not talk about reliability. You drop it when you have... How much
:21:34. > :21:38.would it cost? I cannot give you a figure of the top of my head. So you
:21:39. > :21:42.have a policy you have not costed? I have not got it in front of me but I
:21:43. > :21:48.can find that out for you after the programme. The point is, it will
:21:49. > :21:51.save consumers money, it is the right thing to do in terms of
:21:52. > :21:55.accountability and it is coupled with the renewable energy
:21:56. > :21:59.revolution. It is not a panacea, we should move towards it, but
:22:00. > :22:02.decentralise it like Germany, that is cost-effective and it makes money
:22:03. > :22:08.and it gives back to the community, why would you not do it? Donald
:22:09. > :22:13.Trump has told America out of the Paris Agreement which he said was
:22:14. > :22:16.voluntary. It is clear where you stand on that issue! He said it
:22:17. > :22:19.would not have mattered if he had met those targets or not, what is
:22:20. > :22:22.the point of those international agreements? The point of the Paris
:22:23. > :22:28.Agreement and when we heard Theresa May make this point in the debate
:22:29. > :22:32.the other night, it revealed the details of the conversation with
:22:33. > :22:40.Donald Trump and I think that is such a such weak leadership! What
:22:41. > :22:43.you say? She basically said, Donald said he was leaving the Paris
:22:44. > :22:47.Agreement and she said, we are not, not a great idea but why not? I
:22:48. > :22:53.would have said, I cannot repeat it here! But I think you have to say
:22:54. > :22:58.this is totally unacceptable, economic click the literate.
:22:59. > :23:01.Environmentally illiterate and scientifically illiterate and
:23:02. > :23:04.entirely the wrong decision. We should be in the Paris Agreement
:23:05. > :23:08.because climate change does not stop at the border, we have to work with
:23:09. > :23:12.other countries to get those agreements. It sets a framework and
:23:13. > :23:15.direction for local business, for those people making that energy
:23:16. > :23:20.transition. It was the big corporations investing that's it to
:23:21. > :23:24.Trump, you are throwing us off course and giving us the wrong
:23:25. > :23:26.direction. If we are to make this transition, we need a player like
:23:27. > :23:32.America involved and at the table. The next question is about whether
:23:33. > :23:40.the Green Party can enact any proposals in their proposal --
:23:41. > :23:46.manifesto. Should Green Party voters vote tactically and Labour to stop
:23:47. > :23:49.the Conservatives winning a majority? In about 30 seats around
:23:50. > :23:53.the country, one thing I am proud about the Green Party is that we
:23:54. > :24:02.look beyond tribal politics and we believe we should act in the
:24:03. > :24:06.interests of the country. But the selection, where there is a Green
:24:07. > :24:10.candidate, I want you and everyone else to vote Green because we are at
:24:11. > :24:15.a fork in the road. You will hear from Paul Nuttall in a minute and he
:24:16. > :24:19.is taking the country, even though he has no MPs at Westminster, down
:24:20. > :24:25.the wrong road. His party has said to the Government come jump, the
:24:26. > :24:28.government has said, how high? They pursuing an extreme Brexit to take
:24:29. > :24:31.us in the wrong direction as a country and that will be inward
:24:32. > :24:35.looking. If you want an outward looking and inclusive vision
:24:36. > :24:40.standing up for freedom of movement, to make the right decisions over for
:24:41. > :24:44.example Trident nuclear weapons, where Labour's policy is frankly a
:24:45. > :24:50.shambles, vote for the Green Party, this is at stake, has job vote for
:24:51. > :24:54.the Greens. Why have the other parties not gone in on this progress
:24:55. > :24:59.alliance? Nobody has signed up to it officially and you are standing
:25:00. > :25:03.aside in 30 seats. Extremely disappointing. With my co-leader
:25:04. > :25:07.Caroline Lucas, I wrote to Tim Farron and Jeremy Corbyn at the
:25:08. > :25:11.beginning of the election to say, please talk about it. And for
:25:12. > :25:15.Ashley, they did not reciprocate, but sometimes you have to make the
:25:16. > :25:19.first move and show leadership and I am really proud we did show that
:25:20. > :25:23.leadership. How big a problem is it your proposals are similar to Jeremy
:25:24. > :25:28.Corbyn and the Labour Party? There is common ground. Most of it. No,
:25:29. > :25:35.not most of it. Where is the commitment to proportional
:25:36. > :25:38.representation in the manifesto? Why is he spending ?110 billion
:25:39. > :25:42.reviewing nuclear weapons which he said he would never use when we
:25:43. > :25:49.could be giving a kiss of life to the NHS? You cannot tackle
:25:50. > :25:53.appellation and pursue a programme of airport expansion and road
:25:54. > :25:56.building. So why are you standing aside in so many seats? We believe
:25:57. > :26:01.this comment is so dangerous and will be so ad for the future Britain
:26:02. > :26:06.that we have to suck it up, and it is painful but I think it is the
:26:07. > :26:10.right thing to do. Your polling figures, they are extremely low,
:26:11. > :26:14.lower than in 2015, you are not cutting through. I think we know
:26:15. > :26:18.what is happening, this is a very tactical election and we are in a
:26:19. > :26:23.broken electoral system which pushes everyone towards two parties. So in
:26:24. > :26:26.an extreme situation like we have now with this Government pursuing a
:26:27. > :26:32.very extreme path. To his credit, Jeremy Corbyn is shaking up the
:26:33. > :26:38.debate, I want to praise him, he is shaking up the debate. In 2015, we
:26:39. > :26:43.were the only ones saying austerity was not necessary and is now Labour
:26:44. > :26:47.are saying this in their manifesto. Back to the question, your response?
:26:48. > :26:51.Some of the seats in Bristol are very marginal and I have voted Green
:26:52. > :26:55.before and respect some of your policies at its so close. Voting
:26:56. > :27:01.Labour to seems like the logical thing to do in this election. In
:27:02. > :27:03.Bristol West, it is very close between Greens and Labour and you
:27:04. > :27:09.can vote with your heart. You really can. As Greens, we will work with
:27:10. > :27:14.Labour if there is a minority Labour government on a case-by-case aces.
:27:15. > :27:18.In real life outside the Westminster bubble, when you see common ground,
:27:19. > :27:22.you work with other people and I do not know why on Earth we do not do
:27:23. > :27:33.that in politics. The lady in the front row. Does that mean if you
:27:34. > :27:38.have MPs, you will push for proportional representation?
:27:39. > :27:40.Absolutely. When you get Green MPs in Parliament, in a Conservative
:27:41. > :27:46.government, you will get them holding them to account. We will
:27:47. > :27:49.also hold Labour's feet to the fire to deliver on those manifesto
:27:50. > :27:54.promises and to push them towards the ideas like the four day week and
:27:55. > :27:58.basic income and scrapping Trident and proportional representation. If
:27:59. > :28:05.you want a vote that matters, vote Green Party. Given the Green Party
:28:06. > :28:10.will not be forming the next government, what difference do you
:28:11. > :28:14.think it will make to have extra green MPs alongside Caroline Lucas
:28:15. > :28:20.and what can they do that one cannot. You are right, I say
:28:21. > :28:26.probably I will not be walking into ten Downing Street on the night.
:28:27. > :28:30.Thank you for being realistic. In 2015 according to our vote share,
:28:31. > :28:35.and a fair voting system, we would have had to 24 MPs in the House of
:28:36. > :28:39.Commons. Imagine 24 of Caroline Lucas in the House of Commons, it
:28:40. > :28:43.would shake up politics! Labour or Liberal Democrats, you know that is
:28:44. > :28:48.true. The lady there in the front row. By your logic and I supported
:28:49. > :28:56.in part, how many Ukip representatives would we have?
:28:57. > :29:04.I am a Democrat. The Greens are the antithesis to Ukip. If you want to
:29:05. > :29:14.finish off Ukip forever, vote Green for the let's get above Ukip. That's
:29:15. > :29:20.another reason. I am afraid that is all we have time for. Jonathan
:29:21. > :29:28.Bartley, please show your appreciation. You are free to go.
:29:29. > :29:33.APPLAUSE Now you watching a special election
:29:34. > :29:39.programme here in Bristol. You can join in the discussion on Twitter by
:29:40. > :29:43.using the hash tag BBC debate. Thank you to our studio audience for their
:29:44. > :29:49.support fall Jonathan Bartley answering the questions. I can now
:29:50. > :29:53.work in the leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party. Please
:29:54. > :29:53.show your appreciation for Paul Nuttall.
:29:54. > :30:05.CHEERING AND APPLAUSE Paul Nuttall, I will start with the
:30:06. > :30:09.same question I put to Jonathan Bartley a short while ago and that
:30:10. > :30:13.is your response to what Theresa May has said in the light of the
:30:14. > :30:18.shocking events last night on the streets of London? She thinks the
:30:19. > :30:24.country needs a completely different approach to extremism and terrorism.
:30:25. > :30:30.Do you agree with her? I do. I have been calling for that for a long
:30:31. > :30:33.time. It is interesting to hear Theresa May finally identify what
:30:34. > :30:39.the problem is. We have had politician after politician who has
:30:40. > :30:46.refused to accept the problem is Islamist ideology. Islamist them is
:30:47. > :30:53.not Islam. It is a political ideology, an ideology of violence. I
:30:54. > :31:03.was glad to hear Therese a talk about is lamb extremism today. --
:31:04. > :31:07.Theresa May. We need to ensure there are more police officers on the
:31:08. > :31:11.street. We believe community policing is important. People are
:31:12. > :31:16.going to pass on information to be more likely to be two policemen in
:31:17. > :31:21.the local community. We need to see the Muslim community itself sign up
:31:22. > :31:29.to the Prevent programme. Only one in eight at the moment do that.
:31:30. > :31:35.There is a breakdown of trust. We need to rebuild it. Finally, we also
:31:36. > :31:40.have to look at the Saudi or Qatari funding of mosques. Saudi Arabia
:31:41. > :31:48.spreads hatred and radicalism and violence around the globe. We have
:31:49. > :31:53.to look at the funding of mosques. Let's take our first question from
:31:54. > :31:59.James, Michael. You recently said detention without trial should be
:32:00. > :32:05.considered for terrorist suspects. Isn't this against British values of
:32:06. > :32:12.justice? What I said is that nothing should be taken off the table. I
:32:13. > :32:18.also talked about return to control orders and tagging. The safety of
:32:19. > :32:22.British civilians and last night in Manchester and the Westminster
:32:23. > :32:27.attack proves this, is more important than the human rights of
:32:28. > :32:33.any would-be jihadi. What we have to do is accept we are now living in a
:32:34. > :32:38.different world. The living in a dangerous society. There are a small
:32:39. > :32:43.group of people in this country. It is small. They hate the way we live
:32:44. > :32:49.hate who we are and want to destroy our democracy. The Muslim community
:32:50. > :32:54.itself are victims. The vast majority of Muslims are peaceful.
:32:55. > :33:01.They add to our culture and economy. There are a small number. I have
:33:02. > :33:06.called radical Islamism a cancer that needs to be cut out. Let's take
:33:07. > :33:14.some more comments from the audience. The gentleman on the front
:33:15. > :33:18.row. What is your attitude to places like Tower Hamlets where you have
:33:19. > :33:22.groups of young Islamic men wandering around and telling people
:33:23. > :33:27.what to do? It should be made perfectly clear there is one law in
:33:28. > :33:32.this country and that is British law. People should sign up to
:33:33. > :33:40.British values and the British way of life. Period. It should simply
:33:41. > :33:47.not be accepted within British society and these people should be
:33:48. > :33:51.told loud and clear there is one rule for this country. If you break
:33:52. > :33:56.the law you go through the criminal justice system. What are you
:33:57. > :34:00.suggesting? These people are verbally telling people to cover up
:34:01. > :34:04.and whatnot. They are not necessarily breaking the law. They
:34:05. > :34:09.need to be told and it needs to be made clear, you are in Britain a new
:34:10. > :34:15.sign up to the British way of life. Internment is the answer, is it? I
:34:16. > :34:21.did not say that. I also mention water boarding by the way. That is
:34:22. > :34:25.in the case if there is going to be an imminent terrorist attack. If we
:34:26. > :34:30.had to find out information quickly, I would not take anything off the
:34:31. > :34:37.table to ensure British women, men and children are kept safe. Is that
:34:38. > :34:40.not extreme? I will tell you what is extreme, people going into the
:34:41. > :34:45.Manchester Arena and blowing themselves up with a nail bomb and
:34:46. > :34:51.killing 22 women and children. Someone driving a van last night Dan
:34:52. > :34:59.Westminster Bridge and knowing people over. That is extreme and
:35:00. > :35:02.what needs to be cut out. I think it is notable that you attempt to
:35:03. > :35:13.distinguish between is lamb and Islamism. -- Islam. Thank you for
:35:14. > :35:25.putting that in the narrative. With the Prevent strategy, it you have
:35:26. > :35:31.suggested banning the burqa. You are grouping these people. It is about
:35:32. > :35:38.integration. One thing is clear in this country and it is proven by
:35:39. > :35:44.reports by Trevor Phillips. We are becoming more divided society and
:35:45. > :35:51.are integrating. It is actually nothing to do with my rhetoric. It
:35:52. > :35:55.is down to failed ideology of multiculturalism. That is a problem
:35:56. > :36:01.whereby communities are encouraged to live alongside each other but
:36:02. > :36:06.never necessarily have to mix. It cannot be right that 22% of Muslim
:36:07. > :36:09.women in Britain either do not speak English or speak very little
:36:10. > :36:16.English. If you are talking about the banning of face coverings, if
:36:17. > :36:22.people turn up at an EDL march, they should not be able to cover their
:36:23. > :36:29.faces. As for the kneecap and the burqa, I would argue two things.
:36:30. > :36:42.One, it is about security. There are numerous examples of people escaping
:36:43. > :36:45.wearing the Burke or the nikab. For CCTV to be effective, you need to
:36:46. > :36:51.build to see people's faces. Secondly, it is all about
:36:52. > :36:54.integration. To enjoy the full fruits of Bridget society and mini
:36:55. > :37:05.cake properly, you must show your face. -- British society. We will
:37:06. > :37:09.take some more comments from the audience. Prevent has been
:37:10. > :37:14.criticised for alienating communities. I wonder whether some
:37:15. > :37:22.of your rhetoric and away in which you speak about is lamb is inciting
:37:23. > :37:25.radicalisation. -- Islam. I would not feel particularly comfortable
:37:26. > :37:32.with some of the sweeping statements you are making. Actually, I'm not
:37:33. > :37:38.taking anything negative about Islam, I am saying negative things
:37:39. > :37:44.about Islamism. It breeds these people who hate us and want to kill
:37:45. > :37:51.us. We must do something about it. We have to say that Islamism is not
:37:52. > :37:56.welcome in Britain. I was glad today to hear Theresa May saying enough is
:37:57. > :38:03.enough. We cannot allow this to continue. We must cut it out. Put
:38:04. > :38:08.more police on the streets. Radicalisation is rife in the
:38:09. > :38:12.prisons. It means putting more prison officers, 7000 more prison
:38:13. > :38:21.officers, more border guards. We must ensure our own people are safe.
:38:22. > :38:24.Another comment from the man in the middle. Further to your integration
:38:25. > :38:27.policy where you have mentioned that where the perpetrators of sex
:38:28. > :38:32.grooming gangs are targeting girls from outside the community, why do
:38:33. > :38:36.you think the UK political parties are so shy of noticing this pattern
:38:37. > :38:39.where the victims are almost always white girls, seek girls and Hindu
:38:40. > :38:46.girls and the grooming gangs are almost always from a particular
:38:47. > :38:54.section of the community, ie Pakistani Muslims? You are right. It
:38:55. > :38:58.is because of political correctness. Other political parties and local
:38:59. > :39:06.authorities have turned a blind eye to those for far too long. We have
:39:07. > :39:10.had a situation like in Rotherham where we had 1400 girls who were
:39:11. > :39:17.groomed or raped. Terrible things. Because of political correctness, we
:39:18. > :39:22.said nothing and turned a blind eye. I would argue that religion and race
:39:23. > :39:27.in these circumstances should be an aggravating factor when these cases
:39:28. > :39:31.go to court. These people have been through the criminal justice system
:39:32. > :39:37.and they were convicted. What do you want to do further? You want to make
:39:38. > :39:41.their religion... Religion and race in other cases are an aggravating
:39:42. > :39:47.factor. With the grooming gangs in has not been. These girls have been
:39:48. > :40:05.picked because they are Hindu and predominantly white. My name is
:40:06. > :40:10.Kamal Mohammed. Let me just condemn the horrible and appalling attack
:40:11. > :40:22.happened in London last night. APPLAUSE
:40:23. > :40:26.I am really glad to hear you talking positively about the Muslim
:40:27. > :40:31.community. You also talked about building trust with the Muslim
:40:32. > :40:38.community in order to tackle extremism. You like figures and
:40:39. > :40:42.numbers. Recent research conducted in the University of Bristol says,
:40:43. > :40:50.if you are a qualified Muslim with a degree, you have three times less
:40:51. > :40:58.chance to get the job a white person can get. That is reset. You love
:40:59. > :41:04.figures. What can you do to tackle racism? You want to build trust
:41:05. > :41:10.between us. How will you tackle institutional racism?
:41:11. > :41:16.APPLAUSE I am not aware of that piece of
:41:17. > :41:26.research. If it is correct then it is wrong. Another statistic. 16%.
:41:27. > :41:29.Answer that. How would you deal with racism in communities? It is all
:41:30. > :41:38.about racism and bringing people together. Telling women not to wear
:41:39. > :41:44.the Burke and nikab would help, would it? What are you so want to
:41:45. > :41:56.say is you have given that statistic. Extreme percent our
:41:57. > :42:01.unemployed. -- 16% are unemployed. I would argue, in a sense that you are
:42:02. > :42:06.probably right to a point. There is also an issue around integration and
:42:07. > :42:18.Muslim women being willing to put themselves forward for jobs. Again
:42:19. > :42:25.the burqa and nikab preclude that. The burqa has nothing to do with
:42:26. > :42:37.that. Let me go on to the next question. Leila King. Does Ukip and
:42:38. > :42:44.your general rhetoric and policy can do you bear some responsibility for
:42:45. > :42:52.the rise in UK terrorism and was it a sincere and appropriate gesture to
:42:53. > :42:58.be the only party who did not suspend your election campaigning
:42:59. > :43:02.following last night's attack? Obviously the Greens have not
:43:03. > :43:08.because you have just had the Green co-leader on this platform as well.
:43:09. > :43:12.What I will say, it was an act of defiance. These people hate our
:43:13. > :43:18.democracy from what a great way to say you will not beat us by ensuring
:43:19. > :43:23.our general election takes place. And it continues. What about your
:43:24. > :43:28.rhetoric in terms of leading to radicalisation? What is leading to
:43:29. > :43:38.radicalisation are places like Saudi Arabia and Qatar spreading Islamist
:43:39. > :43:49.all over the globe. -- Islamism all over the globe. I think Gerard got
:43:50. > :43:56.his terminology wrong. What I have made clear it is extremist Islamism
:43:57. > :44:00.is a problem we have. I will go back to the question and then open it up
:44:01. > :44:06.to the rest of the audience. Going back to one of the issues you
:44:07. > :44:10.brought up a moment ago in terms of religious headdress, whether or not,
:44:11. > :44:15.in a separate context you think this is a kind of practical and tangible
:44:16. > :44:21.request of a society that they should have their face visible at
:44:22. > :44:24.all times, can you not see how bringing up these personal,
:44:25. > :44:30.alienating, culturally judgmental points, it does alienate people.
:44:31. > :44:38.This is going to happen anyway. It has already the happened on France
:44:39. > :44:44.and Belgium and Bulgaria. You are the only party proposing it here.
:44:45. > :44:47.Hold on! It will happen in Germany eventually and Angela Merkel is
:44:48. > :44:51.talking about it already, and in Austria and Holland. We can either
:44:52. > :45:00.the on the curve or behind the curve. One law for all, that is what
:45:01. > :45:05.I would like for us in this country. Where we have Sharia law saying one
:45:06. > :45:10.thing and our law saying another, I think you will have complete
:45:11. > :45:14.division forever until we have one law for everybody. We will all know
:45:15. > :45:23.what is good and what is bad and we will move on from there. I tend to
:45:24. > :45:29.agree and I do not believe in Sharia councils or a Sharia court because I
:45:30. > :45:33.do not believe there is a place for a court whether war word of a woman
:45:34. > :45:39.is half that of a man. We have to move on to other questions and there
:45:40. > :45:44.is only one law in this country, to be clear, in the ayes of the
:45:45. > :45:52.Government. Just to make it clear. The next question please. Andrew.
:45:53. > :45:54.Ukip proposed to defend the NHS with a significant proportion of the
:45:55. > :46:08.staff working there being immigrant is. The greatest danger to the NHS
:46:09. > :46:14.surely is Brexit and Ukip? No, it is not a danger. Because what we would
:46:15. > :46:17.like to see, there are 167,000 migrants working in the NHS and I
:46:18. > :46:21.would like to see the Government and the date it is elected, turn around
:46:22. > :46:27.to these people and say, you provide a great job for our NHS, you're good
:46:28. > :46:33.for the economy, you can stay. Simple as that. As for Ukip being
:46:34. > :46:37.bad for the NHS, we are the party offering the best deal for the NHS
:46:38. > :46:41.out of any political parties. Because we are prepared to look at
:46:42. > :46:45.other priorities. We would like to see the foreign aid budget which is
:46:46. > :46:56.costing the British people ?30 million every single day cut. Cut
:46:57. > :47:01.it. And we would save ?11 billion a year. That money can be transferred
:47:02. > :47:07.directly into social care and into the NHS. What levelled you want to
:47:08. > :47:13.cut it to? You say in your manifesto to 0.2%, that does not save 11
:47:14. > :47:17.billion pounds, foreign aid budget is ?12 million. -- ?12 billion. It
:47:18. > :47:25.will do because it will go up year-on-year. Even if we cut it to
:47:26. > :47:28.0.2% of GNI, that is the same level as what America was paying under the
:47:29. > :47:33.Obama administration and nobody would suggest America under Obama
:47:34. > :47:41.was not charitable, it is still more than Spain and Portugal together.
:47:42. > :47:43.Sorry, we know from research and from polling that the vast majority
:47:44. > :47:49.of people agree with us on this issue. Cut the foreign aid budget
:47:50. > :47:54.and spend British taxpayers' money on the NHS. All the other parties
:47:55. > :48:05.have signed up to that 0.7% commitment. You are talking complete
:48:06. > :48:09.rubbish, I am sorry! Somebody over there talked about institutional
:48:10. > :48:18.racism and you represent it. Oh, go on! I am sorry. How? The health
:48:19. > :48:23.service has a huge number of people who are being affected by your
:48:24. > :48:29.approach to our society. Because I want to see the foreign aid budget
:48:30. > :48:34.cutting? No, because you are coming across as a polemic darkness in the
:48:35. > :48:40.way we see ourselves. Sorry, but you are. You talk about waterboarding as
:48:41. > :48:44.an example and dragging us back to a lower level. We are better than
:48:45. > :48:53.that. We have a higher standard. No, no! We do not want to be dragged
:48:54. > :48:59.down to where you are! I am talking about protecting British citizens.
:49:00. > :49:02.We are spending foreign aid, we are giving foreign aid to a country like
:49:03. > :49:08.India which has more millionaires and billionaires and ourselves. A
:49:09. > :49:11.country which has its own space programme and its own nuclear
:49:12. > :49:20.weapons and aircraft carriers. I am sorry, Charity begins at home! If
:49:21. > :49:26.your policies were so popular, why have you done so six particularly --
:49:27. > :49:30.techie we badly in recent elections, local elections and by-elections? --
:49:31. > :49:35.why have you done so badly. You are putting forward your policies but
:49:36. > :49:39.they are not popular and people have not voted for you. I would not say
:49:40. > :49:44.the Stoke election was bad and we cut Labour's majority in half. I
:49:45. > :49:50.said both, and you were supposed to win it! In the local elections, we
:49:51. > :49:55.ways knew they would be the most difficult in Ukip's history. Ukip
:49:56. > :50:01.has won the war in many ways by getting the referendum and Brexit.
:50:02. > :50:05.Now we have got to win peace. It is so important because we have to be
:50:06. > :50:10.the country's insurance policy. I think Theresa May will win this
:50:11. > :50:14.election. But I do not trust her to get a good deal for Britain when she
:50:15. > :50:21.goes into these negotiations and Ukip has to be there to be the guard
:50:22. > :50:27.dog of Brexit that we voted for on June 23rd last year. Let's go to the
:50:28. > :50:30.lady with glasses. You just mentioned you have won the war,
:50:31. > :50:42.presumably you mean Brexit, that is what Ukip was for, why do we still
:50:43. > :50:46.need Ukip? Won reasons. I have basically made one point -- two
:50:47. > :50:50.reasons. Whoever is Prime Minister and I think it will be Theresa May,
:50:51. > :50:54.I am not convinced they will negotiate hard enough to get the
:50:55. > :50:59.best deal. Let me just make this point. If it was not for Ukip in
:51:00. > :51:03.2013, there would not have been a referendum, we forced a then British
:51:04. > :51:07.Prime Minister David Cameron who never wanted to give a referendum
:51:08. > :51:14.into giving one in the first place and that is proof of how important
:51:15. > :51:17.Ukip can be. If Ukip is on the pitch and strong and going up in the polls
:51:18. > :51:22.and winning local elections. Rope but it is not, that is my point!
:51:23. > :51:26.Sometimes in politics, the tide comes in and it goes out and it will
:51:27. > :51:30.come back in again and if Ukip is strong, we can ensure we are the
:51:31. > :51:36.Prime Minister's back home to get the kind of Brexit deal we want. The
:51:37. > :51:39.lady at the back in the corner. It is also important Ukip is around
:51:40. > :51:44.because we drive the political agenda. We make the political
:51:45. > :51:48.weather in many ways. People laughed at as in the Westminster bubble
:51:49. > :51:52.because they felt a bit uncomfortable about our integration
:51:53. > :51:56.agenda. Theresa May is now talking our language. Ten years ago when we
:51:57. > :52:01.spoke about Brexit, people said it was lunacy! When we spoke about a
:52:02. > :52:08.points-based system on immigration, people said it was racist, it is now
:52:09. > :52:13.government policy. What issue or immigration system now, you want a
:52:14. > :52:22.one M and a 1-out policy, that is a MX? No, it is not a gimmick. Look,
:52:23. > :52:26.this is a policy called balanced migration. It was first proposed by
:52:27. > :52:31.Frank Field, the Labour MP for Birkenhead and supported by Nicholas
:52:32. > :52:37.Soames, the Tory MPs. It goes like this, we want to see zero net
:52:38. > :52:44.immigration over the next five years. So last year 339,000 will
:52:45. > :52:50.left Britain, that means we would let him the same sort of number.
:52:51. > :52:53.However, there would also be an Australian points-based system so
:52:54. > :52:57.what we would get into the country would be skilled migrants who adds
:52:58. > :53:03.to the economy and tax and it would be good for British wages and for
:53:04. > :53:09.social cohesion and the economy. So however many doctors or high-tech
:53:10. > :53:14.specialists we might need, they could not come to the UK unless
:53:15. > :53:19.somebody left? It would not be 339,000 we would need. Would you
:53:20. > :53:23.have to wait for summer due to leave before you get a doctor? It is done
:53:24. > :53:29.over a five-year period and not one year. It is not zero gross
:53:30. > :53:33.immigration and we are not pulling up the drawbridge, there would still
:53:34. > :53:37.be about 300,000 a year, but we would be left with skilled migrants.
:53:38. > :53:44.So not the tens of thousands even in net migration? Net migration, not
:53:45. > :53:49.gross migration. Back to the point about NHS staffing shortages and
:53:50. > :53:54.your evident pride in Brexit, what is your response to figures
:53:55. > :53:58.conducted by the Royal College of Nursing that since Brexit, there has
:53:59. > :54:03.been a 92% degrees in EU migrants registering to be nurses in the UK.
:54:04. > :54:08.People are not now wanting to come to the UK! It is not about butting
:54:09. > :54:13.up the drawbridge! The majority of nurses without the NHS, they are
:54:14. > :54:20.British. And the next on the list, they are non-EU migrants. What we
:54:21. > :54:28.need to do, we need to start training our own nurses. It cannot
:54:29. > :54:31.be right or fair we are taking -- taking nurses from countries in
:54:32. > :54:36.Africa where one in three people have HIV. Some people say that would
:54:37. > :54:43.take up to ten years. We are taking nurses from some countries in
:54:44. > :54:45.Africa... I said it is not fair we are taking nurses from these
:54:46. > :54:49.countries when quite frankly they are obviously needed in their
:54:50. > :54:54.countries of origin. The final comment from the audience. What is
:54:55. > :55:00.your response to the economists and the companies that will take a lot
:55:01. > :55:05.of jobs out of the UK after Brexit and the fact there is a lot of study
:55:06. > :55:10.showing immigration is economically beneficial for the UK cannot you
:55:11. > :55:16.just pursuing ideology and cutting immigration with Brexit? No. A lot
:55:17. > :55:21.of these reports have not taken into account, and the Office for Budget
:55:22. > :55:25.Responsibility at the list in their report, it keeps getting quoted this
:55:26. > :55:31.6 billion a year, they admit they have not taken into account
:55:32. > :55:35.population growth. So last year, we allowed in net, a city the size of
:55:36. > :55:40.Hull City. It is Birmingham every five-year is. By the middle of the
:55:41. > :55:43.century, we have a population of 80 million people. That means a new
:55:44. > :55:48.hospital building programme, a new school building programme, at new
:55:49. > :55:54.motorways and a new rail network if you take on how much that will cost.
:55:55. > :56:00.How you against this? If you take into account the cost of the capital
:56:01. > :56:03.investment to going to keeping up with population, it is going to be
:56:04. > :56:07.massive. You need to control the population and you do that by
:56:08. > :56:18.bouncing migration. Next question now. Bearing in mind that you were
:56:19. > :56:28.supportive of Donald Trump pulling out of the climate change talks, do
:56:29. > :56:34.you believe in climate change? Firstly, I mean, I did not support
:56:35. > :56:37.Donald Trump during his election. I think some of the things that he
:56:38. > :56:45.said, specifically regarding women, they went above and beyond the pale.
:56:46. > :56:49.And I do not think this Muslim ban is going to work in any way, shape
:56:50. > :56:53.or form and I do not think it is right. But what I will say is he is
:56:54. > :56:59.actually only doing what he said he was going to do. If he did not, what
:57:00. > :57:04.is the point producing a manifesto? Someone who is elected in a
:57:05. > :57:10.democracy is carrying out the will of the people. He said. Macro do you
:57:11. > :57:17.believe in climate change? Of course I believe in climate change. And who
:57:18. > :57:22.is responsible? Different factors. Including man-made climate change?
:57:23. > :57:26.Yes, man plays some role in the changing of the climate. But I do
:57:27. > :57:33.not buy into the climate alarmist agenda. The gentleman at the back, a
:57:34. > :57:35.brief comment. You just said that people should stand by their
:57:36. > :57:43.manifesto promises and you introduced it I saying you supported
:57:44. > :57:46.British values. One of which I thought was happy as corpus. You
:57:47. > :57:54.went on to talk about detention without trial and it reminded me of
:57:55. > :58:02.the gnats is that when they came for the Jews, I did not think because I
:58:03. > :58:09.was not a Jew. There was no one left! When we are going to realise
:58:10. > :58:14.there is a group of people in this country, MI5 said 23,000, who hate
:58:15. > :58:18.who we are, they hate who we are and they want to kill us. I want to
:58:19. > :58:23.ensure things like Manchester and London last night do not become
:58:24. > :58:25.commonplace in this country! We have to say goodbye, please show your
:58:26. > :58:31.appreciation and thank you very much, Paul Nuttall.
:58:32. > :58:36.APPLAUSE That brings as to the end of this Election Questions special
:58:37. > :58:37.in Bristol, thank you very much to the audience, from everybody here,
:58:38. > :58:41.good night.