0:00:35 > 0:00:42independence
0:00:42 > 0:00:56Thank
0:00:56 > 0:01:10First
0:01:10 > 0:01:19their seats. their seats.
0:01:19 > 0:01:23their seats. these issues in a sensible issue, I
0:01:23 > 0:01:25their seats. would
0:01:25 > 0:01:36the future. Thank you. Your time is the future. Thank you. Your time is
0:01:36 > 0:01:45the future. Thank you. Your time is chamber?
0:01:45 > 0:01:47the future. Thank you. Your time is Constantine is
0:01:47 > 0:02:00United Kingdom. United Kingdom.
0:02:00 > 0:02:02United Kingdom. you
0:02:02 > 0:02:10United Kingdom. been
0:02:10 > 0:02:12United Kingdom. Thank you.
0:02:12 > 0:02:18United Kingdom. join
0:02:18 > 0:02:22United Kingdom. George Osborne? I will join
0:02:22 > 0:02:29United Kingdom. in
0:02:29 > 0:02:32United Kingdom. that
0:02:32 > 0:02:36United Kingdom. the House of
0:02:36 > 0:02:38United Kingdom. points made
0:02:38 > 0:02:42United Kingdom. that when
0:02:42 > 0:02:48United Kingdom. unfair to
0:02:48 > 0:02:49United Kingdom. that
0:02:49 > 0:02:52United Kingdom. those
0:02:52 > 0:02:54United Kingdom. followed
0:02:54 > 0:03:04United Kingdom. the House of Commons.
0:03:04 > 0:03:22United Kingdom. or after a yes
0:03:22 > 0:03:37United Kingdom. what the Labour Party
0:03:37 > 0:03:44United Kingdom. the reduction of
0:03:44 > 0:03:51United Kingdom. as
0:03:51 > 0:04:01United Kingdom. did
0:04:01 > 0:04:03United Kingdom. such
0:04:03 > 0:04:06United Kingdom. and what is right and proper. We
0:04:06 > 0:04:08United Kingdom. think it is wrong at
0:04:08 > 0:04:11United Kingdom. the deficit
0:04:11 > 0:04:14United Kingdom. people
0:04:14 > 0:04:21United Kingdom. it not
0:04:21 > 0:04:24United Kingdom. influence
0:04:24 > 0:04:30United Kingdom. them
0:04:30 > 0:04:31United Kingdom. interesting
0:04:31 > 0:04:32United Kingdom. we
0:04:32 > 0:04:42United Kingdom. have
0:04:42 > 0:04:48United Kingdom. of reintroducing the 50p tax
0:04:48 > 0:04:52United Kingdom. week he said we would
0:04:52 > 0:04:54United Kingdom. rest of the
0:04:54 > 0:04:56United Kingdom. one thing in one
0:04:56 > 0:05:01United Kingdom. absolutely
0:05:01 > 0:05:02United Kingdom. the sharper answer to the
0:05:02 > 0:05:10United Kingdom. asked.
0:05:10 > 0:05:31United Kingdom. It
0:05:31 > 0:05:48United Kingdom. like corporation tax,
0:05:48 > 0:05:50United Kingdom. Tories, it
0:05:50 > 0:05:53United Kingdom. tax-cutting
0:05:53 > 0:06:15United Kingdom. Tories
0:06:15 > 0:06:16United Kingdom. is
0:06:16 > 0:06:34United Kingdom. think
0:06:34 > 0:06:45United Kingdom. support the SNP motion.
0:06:45 > 0:06:49United Kingdom. admitted that it was
0:06:49 > 0:07:16United Kingdom. abstain
0:07:16 > 0:07:18United Kingdom. hope
0:07:18 > 0:07:20United Kingdom. Thankfully,
0:07:20 > 0:07:35United Kingdom. opportunity to
0:07:35 > 0:07:41United Kingdom. and
0:07:41 > 0:07:44United Kingdom. again
0:07:44 > 0:07:54United Kingdom. in
0:07:54 > 0:08:00United Kingdom. It
0:08:00 > 0:08:01United Kingdom. consistently than she
0:08:01 > 0:08:04United Kingdom. colleagues
0:08:04 > 0:08:23United Kingdom. the
0:08:23 > 0:08:28United Kingdom. agree
0:08:28 > 0:08:35United Kingdom. Scotland
0:08:35 > 0:08:41United Kingdom. he
0:08:41 > 0:08:48United Kingdom. answer
0:08:48 > 0:08:51United Kingdom. after
0:08:51 > 0:08:58United Kingdom. first
0:08:58 > 0:09:00United Kingdom. Salmond which is reduced
0:09:00 > 0:09:07United Kingdom. order from rich to
0:09:07 > 0:09:12United Kingdom. a begin he never -- he
0:09:12 > 0:09:28United Kingdom. being
0:09:28 > 0:09:43United Kingdom. Tartan Tories.
0:09:43 > 0:09:45United Kingdom. he
0:09:45 > 0:09:59United Kingdom. committing himself to be more
0:09:59 > 0:10:01United Kingdom. no
0:10:01 > 0:10:07out the history of this? Labour were out the history of this? Labour were
0:10:07 > 0:10:17out the history of this? Labour were are
0:10:17 > 0:10:32out the history of this? Labour were for 36 days of
0:10:32 > 0:10:38out the history of this? Labour were while
0:10:38 > 0:10:40out the history of this? Labour were accept
0:10:40 > 0:10:48out the history of this? Labour were have
0:10:48 > 0:10:50out the history of this? Labour were you should not have the cut
0:10:50 > 0:10:57out the history of this? Labour were rate tax in these
0:10:57 > 0:11:01out the history of this? Labour were also
0:11:01 > 0:11:04out the history of this? Labour were not have
0:11:04 > 0:11:24Under the position that is coming, Under the position that is coming,
0:11:24 > 0:11:26Under the position that is coming, It
0:11:26 > 0:11:30Under the position that is coming, Scotland
0:11:30 > 0:11:32Under the position that is coming, the
0:11:32 > 0:11:34Under the position that is coming, free school meals
0:11:34 > 0:11:38Under the position that is coming, country,
0:11:38 > 0:11:41Under the position that is coming, do it because we
0:11:41 > 0:11:51Under the position that is coming, fairer
0:11:51 > 0:11:52Under the position that is coming, when he
0:11:52 > 0:11:56Under the position that is coming, of
0:11:56 > 0:11:59Under the position that is coming, future.
0:11:59 > 0:12:02Under the position that is coming, first
0:12:02 > 0:12:04Under the position that is coming, operational
0:12:04 > 0:12:18Under the position that is coming, Scotland.
0:12:18 > 0:12:25the communities around Scotland, and the communities around Scotland, and
0:12:25 > 0:12:26the communities around Scotland, and achievement
0:12:26 > 0:12:31the communities around Scotland, and Rally
0:12:31 > 0:12:47the communities around Scotland, and simple
0:12:47 > 0:12:50the communities around Scotland, and 60%
0:12:50 > 0:12:53the communities around Scotland, and close
0:12:53 > 0:12:54the communities around Scotland, and altogether out of this
0:12:54 > 0:12:59the communities around Scotland, and government, and
0:12:59 > 0:13:03the communities around Scotland, and A
0:13:03 > 0:13:12the communities around Scotland, and are shut, have a
0:13:12 > 0:13:13the communities around Scotland, and evidence.
0:13:13 > 0:13:16the communities around Scotland, and claimed
0:13:16 > 0:13:18the communities around Scotland, and change is a unionist
0:13:18 > 0:13:26the voice of reason is sadly absent the voice of reason is sadly absent
0:13:26 > 0:13:28the voice of reason is sadly absent press
0:13:28 > 0:13:30the voice of reason is sadly absent reductions
0:13:30 > 0:13:38the voice of reason is sadly absent and now
0:13:38 > 0:13:40the voice of reason is sadly absent distant from them.
0:13:40 > 0:14:01the voice of reason is sadly absent First
0:14:01 > 0:14:05the voice of reason is sadly absent range of reasons. Under current
0:14:05 > 0:14:11the voice of reason is sadly absent circumstances, the
0:14:11 > 0:14:14the voice of reason is sadly absent controlled
0:14:14 > 0:14:18the voice of reason is sadly absent Westminster.
0:14:18 > 0:14:19the voice of reason is sadly absent the justice budget and in police
0:14:19 > 0:14:22the voice of reason is sadly absent numbers of 10% in England and
0:14:22 > 0:14:29the voice of reason is sadly absent over
0:14:29 > 0:14:32the voice of reason is sadly absent Scotland
0:14:32 > 0:14:35the voice of reason is sadly absent increase
0:14:35 > 0:14:37the voice of reason is sadly absent centralised,
0:14:37 > 0:14:45the voice of reason is sadly absent across
0:14:45 > 0:14:59the voice of reason is sadly absent Police
0:14:59 > 0:15:05the voice of reason is sadly absent rest
0:15:05 > 0:15:07the voice of reason is sadly absent increase in police numbers
0:15:07 > 0:15:11the voice of reason is sadly absent been contradicted in
0:15:11 > 0:15:12the voice of reason is sadly absent that have been taking
0:15:12 > 0:15:15the voice of reason is sadly absent the country. I think
0:15:15 > 0:15:22the voice of reason is sadly absent figures
0:15:22 > 0:15:33the voice of reason is sadly absent in
0:15:33 > 0:15:35the voice of reason is sadly absent officers
0:15:35 > 0:15:41the voice of reason is sadly absent many
0:15:41 > 0:15:50officers are. Look at the situation officers are. Look at the situation
0:15:50 > 0:15:52officers are. Look at the situation decrease
0:15:52 > 0:16:14officers are. Look at the situation Scotland
0:16:14 > 0:16:21officers are. Look at the situation critics
0:16:21 > 0:16:25officers are. Look at the situation not
0:16:25 > 0:16:40officers are. Look at the situation he
0:16:40 > 0:16:46officers are. Look at the situation Justice
0:16:46 > 0:16:59officers are. Look at the situation Bill?
0:16:59 > 0:17:06national coordinator of Rape Crisis national coordinator of Rape Crisis
0:17:06 > 0:17:11national coordinator of Rape Crisis went in
0:17:11 > 0:17:20national coordinator of Rape Crisis forward to making sure
0:17:20 > 0:17:23national coordinator of Rape Crisis at
0:17:23 > 0:17:27national coordinator of Rape Crisis case
0:17:27 > 0:17:28national coordinator of Rape Crisis what every other
0:17:28 > 0:17:36national coordinator of Rape Crisis the world has abandoned the
0:17:36 > 0:17:40national coordinator of Rape Crisis agree
0:17:40 > 0:17:42national coordinator of Rape Crisis that justice can be seen to
0:17:42 > 0:17:49national coordinator of Rape Crisis for the
0:17:49 > 0:17:51national coordinator of Rape Crisis can make sure in doing
0:17:51 > 0:18:09national coordinator of Rape Crisis there
0:18:09 > 0:18:10national coordinator of Rape Crisis feel that people should
0:18:10 > 0:18:29national coordinator of Rape Crisis justice,
0:18:29 > 0:18:39national coordinator of Rape Crisis the
0:18:39 > 0:18:42national coordinator of Rape Crisis who disagree with him.
0:18:42 > 0:18:45national coordinator of Rape Crisis in this Parliament he had a majority
0:18:45 > 0:18:48national coordinator of Rape Crisis but
0:18:48 > 0:18:55national coordinator of Rape Crisis wisdom.
0:18:55 > 0:18:59national coordinator of Rape Crisis Chaos
0:18:59 > 0:19:00national coordinator of Rape Crisis station
0:19:00 > 0:19:10national coordinator of Rape Crisis closing.
0:19:10 > 0:19:19national coordinator of Rape Crisis would reject
0:19:19 > 0:19:21national coordinator of Rape Crisis experts to fix the
0:19:21 > 0:19:23national coordinator of Rape Crisis about to cause on
0:19:23 > 0:19:28national coordinator of Rape Crisis and,
0:19:28 > 0:19:32national coordinator of Rape Crisis divisive
0:19:32 > 0:19:39national coordinator of Rape Crisis he
0:19:39 > 0:19:41national coordinator of Rape Crisis think
0:19:41 > 0:19:43national coordinator of Rape Crisis case. I tried to and his first
0:19:43 > 0:19:50question looking at the substance of question looking at the substance of
0:19:50 > 0:19:55question looking at the substance of first
0:19:55 > 0:19:59question looking at the substance of points he has made.
0:19:59 > 0:20:00question looking at the substance of to
0:20:00 > 0:20:03question looking at the substance of consensus that Willie
0:20:03 > 0:20:05question looking at the substance of been working
0:20:05 > 0:20:07question looking at the substance of questions.
0:20:07 > 0:20:09question looking at the substance of gain on the
0:20:09 > 0:20:14The substance of the issue is that The substance of the issue is that
0:20:14 > 0:20:17The substance of the issue is that can
0:20:17 > 0:20:21The substance of the issue is that two
0:20:21 > 0:20:27The substance of the issue is that safeguards in
0:20:27 > 0:20:29The substance of the issue is that and
0:20:29 > 0:20:31The substance of the issue is that which
0:20:31 > 0:20:35The substance of the issue is that because of
0:20:35 > 0:20:38The substance of the issue is that to
0:20:38 > 0:20:39The substance of the issue is that of evidence
0:20:39 > 0:20:43The substance of the issue is that quality
0:20:43 > 0:20:46The substance of the issue is that the
0:20:46 > 0:20:55The substance of the issue is that seems
0:20:55 > 0:20:57The substance of the issue is that me the
0:20:57 > 0:21:01The substance of the issue is that were
0:21:01 > 0:21:09The substance of the issue is that contrasting a
0:21:09 > 0:21:11The substance of the issue is that where
0:21:11 > 0:21:14The substance of the issue is that and justice
0:21:14 > 0:21:21levels of recorded crime. The first levels of recorded crime. The first
0:21:21 > 0:21:23levels of recorded crime. The first present moment, where his party
0:21:23 > 0:21:26levels of recorded crime. The first jointly
0:21:26 > 0:21:28levels of recorded crime. The first crime, is what
0:21:28 > 0:21:35levels of recorded crime. The first Scotland. Yes, indeed,
0:21:35 > 0:21:38levels of recorded crime. The first Linda Fabiani. To ask what the
0:21:38 > 0:21:40levels of recorded crime. The first Scottish
0:21:40 > 0:21:41levels of recorded crime. The first encourage more women to start their
0:21:41 > 0:21:43levels of recorded crime. The first own businesses.
0:21:43 > 0:21:48levels of recorded crime. The first permission,
0:21:48 > 0:21:53levels of recorded crime. The first reflecting
0:21:53 > 0:21:58levels of recorded crime. The first professor
0:21:58 > 0:22:04levels of recorded crime. The first away? Elsa,
0:22:04 > 0:22:12levels of recorded crime. The first but
0:22:12 > 0:22:14levels of recorded crime. The first important
0:22:14 > 0:22:15levels of recorded crime. The first astonishing contribution as
0:22:15 > 0:22:35feminist economist, both in arguing feminist economist, both in arguing
0:22:35 > 0:22:44feminist economist, both in arguing every
0:22:44 > 0:22:45feminist economist, both in arguing we know that
0:22:45 > 0:22:52feminist economist, both in arguing missed. Can I
0:22:52 > 0:22:55feminist economist, both in arguing offer
0:22:55 > 0:23:06feminist economist, both in arguing inspire
0:23:06 > 0:23:16feminist economist, both in arguing women
0:23:16 > 0:23:19feminist economist, both in arguing is also the
0:23:19 > 0:23:22feminist economist, both in arguing some substantial
0:23:22 > 0:23:24feminist economist, both in arguing increase
0:23:24 > 0:23:26feminist economist, both in arguing employment in
0:23:26 > 0:23:33feminist economist, both in arguing year. The
0:23:33 > 0:23:34feminist economist, both in arguing that
0:23:34 > 0:23:36feminist economist, both in arguing policies that we
0:23:36 > 0:23:38feminist economist, both in arguing should
0:23:38 > 0:23:41feminist economist, both in arguing childcare test. That is
0:23:41 > 0:23:42feminist economist, both in arguing sustainability
0:23:42 > 0:23:46the transformation in childcare the transformation in childcare
0:23:46 > 0:23:47the transformation in childcare sustained
0:23:47 > 0:23:53the transformation in childcare bearing the
0:23:53 > 0:23:56the transformation in childcare but also
0:23:56 > 0:23:57the transformation in childcare in
0:23:57 > 0:24:09the transformation in childcare more women
0:24:35 > 0:24:40treatment, transfer
0:24:40 > 0:24:45that administration.
0:24:45 > 0:24:46for April
0:24:46 > 0:25:0387.6%. 98% was first
0:25:03 > 0:25:06be
0:25:06 > 0:25:22think
0:25:22 > 0:25:25because
0:25:25 > 0:25:29pressures
0:25:29 > 0:25:35Minister? Does he
0:25:35 > 0:25:42patients
0:25:42 > 0:25:43so
0:25:43 > 0:25:46supplementary.
0:25:56 > 0:26:012009.
0:26:01 > 0:26:02second question was said
0:26:02 > 0:26:07and
0:26:07 > 0:26:18here. Yes, it most
0:26:18 > 0:26:23only
0:26:23 > 0:26:40said,
0:26:40 > 0:26:45then
0:26:45 > 0:26:46Neil
0:26:46 > 0:26:50going
0:26:50 > 0:26:51enabling us to resist
0:26:51 > 0:26:57pressures far better but,
0:26:57 > 0:26:59how
0:26:59 > 0:27:04and complain about
0:27:04 > 0:27:29were in office? ! Question six, Liz were in office? ! Question six, Liz
0:27:29 > 0:27:30were in office? ! Question six, Liz improvements
0:27:30 > 0:27:34were in office? ! Question six, Liz services
0:27:34 > 0:27:36were in office? ! Question six, Liz This
0:27:36 > 0:27:40were in office? ! Question six, Liz improvements,
0:27:40 > 0:27:52were in office? ! Question six, Liz to
0:27:52 > 0:28:01were in office? ! Question six, Liz and provide
0:28:01 > 0:28:02were in office? ! Question six, Liz However,
0:28:02 > 0:28:05were in office? ! Question six, Liz pledge
0:28:05 > 0:28:13were in office? ! Question six, Liz he
0:28:13 > 0:28:15were in office? ! Question six, Liz Two years on, when will be pledge to
0:28:15 > 0:28:28were in office? ! Question six, Liz be met? The
0:28:28 > 0:28:36because there is substantial because there is substantial
0:28:36 > 0:28:46because there is substantial new
0:28:46 > 0:29:04because there is substantial that as
0:29:04 > 0:29:08because there is substantial implement
0:29:08 > 0:29:09because there is substantial Perth
0:29:09 > 0:29:12because there is substantial a
0:29:12 > 0:29:15because there is substantial services in
0:29:15 > 0:29:20because there is substantial share my
0:29:20 > 0:29:20because there is substantial attentional
0:29:20 > 0:29:28because there is substantial services? We
0:29:28 > 0:29:30because there is substantial think it
0:29:30 > 0:29:35because there is substantial the
0:29:35 > 0:29:40relevant partnerships to discuss the relevant partnerships to discuss the
0:29:40 > 0:29:45up-to-date feasibility study to up-to-date feasibility study to
0:29:45 > 0:29:53up-to-date feasibility study to certainly
0:29:53 > 0:29:54up-to-date feasibility study to Perth corridor as
0:29:54 > 0:29:57up-to-date feasibility study to are proposed. If you
0:29:57 > 0:30:09up-to-date feasibility study to statistics, these
0:30:09 > 0:30:11up-to-date feasibility study to of
0:30:11 > 0:30:12up-to-date feasibility study to does
0:30:12 > 0:30:16up-to-date feasibility study to of
0:30:16 > 0:30:22up-to-date feasibility study to the
0:30:22 > 0:30:25up-to-date feasibility study to improvement
0:30:25 > 0:30:26up-to-date feasibility study to high-speed rail between Edinburgh
0:30:26 > 0:30:29up-to-date feasibility study to and Glasgow
0:30:29 > 0:30:33up-to-date feasibility study to the scale
0:30:33 > 0:30:35up-to-date feasibility study to own
0:30:35 > 0:30:44up-to-date feasibility study to meagre 20
0:30:44 > 0:30:45up-to-date feasibility study to Unfortunately
0:30:45 > 0:30:52up-to-date feasibility study to she
0:30:52 > 0:31:00Smith?s question about the enhanced Smith?s question about the enhanced
0:31:00 > 0:31:02Smith?s question about the enhanced constituents
0:31:02 > 0:31:06Smith?s question about the enhanced to the
0:31:06 > 0:31:11Smith?s question about the enhanced further
0:31:11 > 0:31:21Smith?s question about the enhanced budgets, my view
0:31:21 > 0:31:23Smith?s question about the enhanced promised
0:31:23 > 0:31:23Smith?s question about the enhanced previous
0:31:23 > 0:31:27Smith?s question about the enhanced the ones
0:31:27 > 0:31:29Smith?s question about the enhanced involved in, does
0:31:29 > 0:31:31Smith?s question about the enhanced that one of
0:31:31 > 0:31:33Smith?s question about the enhanced happening
0:31:33 > 0:31:34Smith?s question about the enhanced improvements
0:31:34 > 0:31:36Smith?s question about the enhanced sure
0:31:36 > 0:31:43Smith?s question about the enhanced to attack
0:31:43 > 0:31:43Smith?s question about the enhanced important development in
0:31:43 > 0:31:47Smith?s question about the enhanced electrification
0:31:47 > 0:31:57Smith?s question about the enhanced if
0:31:57 > 0:32:00Smith?s question about the enhanced allocated, I seem
0:32:00 > 0:32:01Smith?s question about the enhanced played an absolute
0:32:01 > 0:32:11deciding that the project in deciding that the project in
0:32:11 > 0:32:15deciding that the project in Transform
0:32:15 > 0:32:17deciding that the project in but I
0:32:17 > 0:32:27deciding that the project in may
0:32:27 > 0:32:28deciding that the project in invested
0:32:28 > 0:32:37deciding that the project in peripheral
0:32:37 > 0:32:39deciding that the project in Scotland that
0:32:39 > 0:32:42deciding that the project in between Aberdeen
0:32:42 > 0:32:45deciding that the project in tracking
0:32:45 > 0:32:49deciding that the project in single track
0:32:49 > 0:32:54that something the Scottish that something the Scottish
0:32:54 > 0:33:09that something the Scottish Scottish
0:33:09 > 0:33:22improvements and if the member would improvements and if the member would
0:33:22 > 0:33:23improvements and if the member would constituents
0:33:23 > 0:33:24improvements and if the member would pleased to hear about
0:33:24 > 0:33:28improvements and if the member would improvements.
0:33:28 > 0:33:36improvements and if the member would There
0:33:36 > 0:33:37improvements and if the member would and slightly cheeky
0:33:37 > 0:33:43improvements and if the member would for me
0:33:53 > 0:34:00World War. That
0:34:00 > 0:34:01Russians need
0:34:01 > 0:34:02Russaans leed th`t
0:34:02 > 0:34:05currency. To do what you
0:34:05 > 0:34:05said they should do, the Germans
0:34:05 > 0:34:10would need to
0:34:10 > 0:34:11fight. There
0:34:11 > 0:34:13fight. There is