0:00:24 > 0:00:41recess.
0:00:41 > 0:00:48all, we had
0:00:48 > 0:00:59us
0:00:59 > 0:01:01That
0:01:01 > 0:01:02welcoming
0:01:02 > 0:01:08who
0:01:08 > 0:01:09latest members of the
0:01:09 > 0:01:13Union. To ask the First Minister
0:01:13 > 0:01:14what engagements he
0:01:14 > 0:01:18the
0:01:18 > 0:01:21say I
0:01:21 > 0:01:22chamber and
0:01:22 > 0:01:30election. I
0:01:30 > 0:01:34Johann Lamont. Does his budget
0:01:34 > 0:01:51include a
0:01:51 > 0:01:53bills is unworkable or does he
0:01:53 > 0:02:03with
0:02:03 > 0:02:05conversion to
0:02:05 > 0:02:20forward
0:02:20 > 0:02:23SNP
0:02:23 > 0:02:27that
0:02:27 > 0:02:33in this chamber. We will consider in this chamber. We will consider
0:02:33 > 0:02:39in this chamber. We will consider seriously. Sometime the Labour Party
0:02:39 > 0:02:45in this chamber. We will consider should give credit,
0:02:45 > 0:02:49in this chamber. We will consider average
0:02:49 > 0:02:52in this chamber. We will consider total
0:02:52 > 0:03:10in this chamber. We will consider Lamont.
0:03:10 > 0:03:19in this chamber. We will consider the
0:03:19 > 0:03:22in this chamber. We will consider and
0:03:22 > 0:03:28in this chamber. We will consider bonus,
0:03:28 > 0:03:34in this chamber. We will consider his view
0:03:34 > 0:03:41in this chamber. We will consider Nicola
0:03:41 > 0:03:43in this chamber. We will consider from
0:03:43 > 0:03:47in this chamber. We will consider Pay Peter by
0:03:47 > 0:03:54in this chamber. We will consider not say
0:03:54 > 0:03:58in this chamber. We will consider breaking
0:03:58 > 0:04:03in this chamber. We will consider for Scots. Citigroup
0:04:03 > 0:04:08in this chamber. We will consider family and extra ?225 a
0:04:08 > 0:04:10in this chamber. We will consider think that is
0:04:10 > 0:04:13in this chamber. We will consider unworkable. Rather than the
0:04:13 > 0:04:15in this chamber. We will consider Pier
0:04:15 > 0:04:19in this chamber. We will consider why won't
0:04:19 > 0:04:37in this chamber. We will consider up
0:04:37 > 0:04:45in this chamber. We will consider devoted
0:04:45 > 0:04:49in this chamber. We will consider not
0:04:49 > 0:04:51in this chamber. We will consider trying to
0:04:51 > 0:04:55in this chamber. We will consider period. She
0:04:55 > 0:04:59in this chamber. We will consider Nicola
0:04:59 > 0:05:04with energy poverty in Scotland who with energy poverty in Scotland who
0:05:04 > 0:05:05with energy poverty in Scotland who efficiency
0:05:05 > 0:05:07with energy poverty in Scotland who the programmes we have
0:05:07 > 0:05:09with energy poverty in Scotland who Scotland,
0:05:09 > 0:05:14with energy poverty in Scotland who ?70
0:05:14 > 0:05:18with energy poverty in Scotland who electricity
0:05:18 > 0:05:24with energy poverty in Scotland who programme
0:05:24 > 0:05:25with energy poverty in Scotland who are better
0:05:25 > 0:05:30with energy poverty in Scotland who the
0:05:30 > 0:05:32with energy poverty in Scotland who energy companies. I
0:05:32 > 0:05:35with energy poverty in Scotland who with
0:05:35 > 0:05:43with energy poverty in Scotland who figures which
0:05:43 > 0:05:53with energy poverty in Scotland who suggest
0:05:53 > 0:05:55with energy poverty in Scotland who in brown
0:05:55 > 0:05:59with energy poverty in Scotland who blackouts.
0:05:59 > 0:06:05with energy poverty in Scotland who will happen
0:06:05 > 0:06:14with energy poverty in Scotland who exponentially
0:06:14 > 0:06:16with energy poverty in Scotland who applied
0:06:16 > 0:06:20with energy poverty in Scotland who to
0:06:20 > 0:06:24with energy poverty in Scotland who demand. Secondly
0:06:24 > 0:06:28with energy poverty in Scotland who transparency
0:06:28 > 0:06:34with energy poverty in Scotland who Scottish
0:06:34 > 0:06:39with energy poverty in Scotland who household incomes is
0:06:39 > 0:06:46with energy poverty in Scotland who out ideas
0:06:46 > 0:06:51with energy poverty in Scotland who Can I
0:06:51 > 0:07:12Minister's comments were unworthy of Minister's comments were unworthy of
0:07:12 > 0:07:16Minister's comments were unworthy of chamber,
0:07:16 > 0:07:19Minister's comments were unworthy of the
0:07:19 > 0:07:37Minister's comments were unworthy of of
0:07:37 > 0:07:39Minister's comments were unworthy of First
0:07:39 > 0:07:41Minister's comments were unworthy of the
0:07:41 > 0:07:42Minister's comments were unworthy of wrong.
0:07:42 > 0:07:56Minister's comments were unworthy of to move
0:07:56 > 0:08:04Minister's comments were unworthy of Cabinet. Order.
0:08:04 > 0:08:09Minister's comments were unworthy of they
0:08:09 > 0:08:23Minister's comments were unworthy of However, who also backs
0:08:23 > 0:08:26Minister's comments were unworthy of ex-Tory Prime
0:08:26 > 0:08:28Minister's comments were unworthy of Major, is
0:08:28 > 0:08:39Minister's comments were unworthy of First Minister. He
0:08:39 > 0:08:56Minister's comments were unworthy of corporation tax.
0:08:56 > 0:09:01Minister's comments were unworthy of Firstly,
0:09:01 > 0:09:03Minister's comments were unworthy of doing
0:09:03 > 0:09:05Minister's comments were unworthy of was
0:09:05 > 0:09:06Minister's comments were unworthy of Scottish government took, with
0:09:06 > 0:09:09Minister's comments were unworthy of others, was
0:09:09 > 0:09:19Minister's comments were unworthy of key part
0:09:19 > 0:09:21Minister's comments were unworthy of subject into this
0:09:21 > 0:09:23Minister's comments were unworthy of energy
0:09:23 > 0:09:30Minister's comments were unworthy of she
0:09:30 > 0:09:32Minister's comments were unworthy of charges.
0:09:32 > 0:09:33Minister's comments were unworthy of should
0:09:33 > 0:09:44Minister's comments were unworthy of taxation supported
0:09:44 > 0:09:48Minister's comments were unworthy of also
0:09:48 > 0:09:56energy bills, which seems better energy bills, which seems better
0:09:56 > 0:10:01energy bills, which seems better think we
0:10:01 > 0:10:05energy bills, which seems better
0:10:05 > 0:10:12energy bills, which seems better happen
0:10:12 > 0:10:14energy bills, which seems better happens if
0:10:14 > 0:10:26the temporary freeze? If Labour can the temporary freeze? If Labour can
0:10:26 > 0:10:33the temporary freeze? If Labour can attitude
0:10:33 > 0:10:36the temporary freeze? If Labour can seems too
0:10:36 > 0:10:41the temporary freeze? If Labour can remember
0:10:41 > 0:10:47the temporary freeze? If Labour can the
0:10:47 > 0:10:56the temporary freeze? If Labour can It was the Labour
0:10:56 > 0:10:58the temporary freeze? If Labour can opposed
0:10:58 > 0:11:05the temporary freeze? If Labour can has
0:11:05 > 0:11:07the temporary freeze? If Labour can are now in,
0:11:07 > 0:11:12the temporary freeze? If Labour can the Tories
0:11:12 > 0:11:17the temporary freeze? If Labour can over
0:11:17 > 0:11:24the temporary freeze? If Labour can a
0:11:24 > 0:11:30the temporary freeze? If Labour can year.
0:11:30 > 0:11:32the temporary freeze? If Labour can given
0:11:32 > 0:11:35the temporary freeze? If Labour can the council tax
0:11:35 > 0:11:49the temporary freeze? If Labour can the
0:11:49 > 0:11:56the temporary freeze? If Labour can of
0:11:56 > 0:12:00the temporary freeze? If Labour can that
0:12:00 > 0:12:10the temporary freeze? If Labour can companies.
0:12:10 > 0:12:15the temporary freeze? If Labour can companies
0:12:15 > 0:12:23the temporary freeze? If Labour can not explain away what
0:12:23 > 0:12:29the temporary freeze? If Labour can progressive
0:12:29 > 0:12:53the temporary freeze? If Labour can and
0:12:53 > 0:12:54the temporary freeze? If Labour can he stands with the
0:12:54 > 0:13:03companies. Is it not the case that companies. Is it not the case that
0:13:03 > 0:13:06companies. Is it not the case that billion
0:13:06 > 0:13:07companies. Is it not the case that does not
0:13:07 > 0:13:12companies. Is it not the case that the
0:13:12 > 0:13:19companies. Is it not the case that energy
0:13:19 > 0:13:31companies. Is it not the case that First Minister. The
0:13:31 > 0:13:33companies. Is it not the case that Darling had
0:13:33 > 0:13:42companies. Is it not the case that advertiser. It is
0:13:42 > 0:13:44companies. Is it not the case that Johann
0:13:44 > 0:13:46companies. Is it not the case that not actually have the power
0:13:46 > 0:13:51companies. Is it not the case that energy
0:13:51 > 0:13:52companies. Is it not the case that going to
0:13:52 > 0:13:59companies. Is it not the case that well.
0:13:59 > 0:14:02companies. Is it not the case that would
0:14:02 > 0:14:09companies. Is it not the case that and
0:14:09 > 0:14:25companies. Is it not the case that vast array
0:14:25 > 0:14:28companies. Is it not the case that family knows that
0:14:28 > 0:14:36companies. Is it not the case that electricity
0:14:36 > 0:14:50companies. Is it not the case that day that Johann
0:14:50 > 0:14:53companies. Is it not the case that is that we
0:14:53 > 0:14:56companies. Is it not the case that that the
0:14:56 > 0:15:03companies. Is it not the case that of the
0:15:03 > 0:15:18companies. Is it not the case that effectively
0:15:18 > 0:15:21companies. Is it not the case that Minister.
0:15:21 > 0:15:26companies. Is it not the case that near
0:15:26 > 0:15:34companies. Is it not the case that or
0:15:34 > 0:15:36companies. Is it not the case that justified it
0:15:36 > 0:15:43companies. Is it not the case that grounds of the
0:15:43 > 0:15:51companies. Is it not the case that of all
0:15:51 > 0:15:54companies. Is it not the case that Sophie. A
0:15:54 > 0:16:04companies. Is it not the case that surveyed
0:16:04 > 0:16:08companies. Is it not the case that ago. Which
0:16:08 > 0:16:13companies. Is it not the case that advise
0:16:13 > 0:16:15companies. Is it not the case that their duty based
0:16:15 > 0:16:18companies. Is it not the case that as
0:16:18 > 0:16:20companies. Is it not the case that remember
0:16:20 > 0:16:27companies. Is it not the case that stations surveyed, there
0:16:27 > 0:16:30companies. Is it not the case that recorded just one
0:16:30 > 0:16:34companies. Is it not the case that public or business. That was
0:16:34 > 0:16:48companies. Is it not the case that proper that police Scotland
0:16:48 > 0:16:49having this conversation. I
0:16:49 > 0:16:59think
0:16:59 > 0:17:01police officer
0:17:01 > 0:17:04behind a desk
0:17:04 > 0:17:10work. I
0:17:10 > 0:17:21his
0:17:21 > 0:17:31back
0:17:31 > 0:17:33That will have
0:17:33 > 0:17:37of
0:17:37 > 0:17:46stations. Even worse,
0:17:46 > 0:17:55stations footfall
0:17:55 > 0:18:08accurate data is
0:18:08 > 0:18:16information
0:18:16 > 0:18:19these
0:18:19 > 0:18:23solely on numbers.
0:18:23 > 0:18:44agree that
0:18:44 > 0:18:45these numbers
0:18:45 > 0:18:48just
0:18:48 > 0:18:50encore
0:18:50 > 0:18:56definitely
0:18:56 > 0:18:57purposes
0:18:57 > 0:19:07wouldn't it be
0:19:07 > 0:19:12this out?
0:19:12 > 0:19:14mind on
0:19:14 > 0:19:24recognises
0:19:24 > 0:19:31officers
0:19:31 > 0:19:36period?
0:19:36 > 0:19:49consultation.
0:19:49 > 0:19:53than when we
0:19:53 > 0:19:56been
0:19:56 > 0:20:00numbers south
0:20:00 > 0:20:05crime rate! We
0:20:05 > 0:20:23Scotland
0:20:23 > 0:20:25Bulldogs in
0:20:25 > 0:20:32sure all
0:20:32 > 0:20:37There
0:20:37 > 0:21:01dangerous
0:21:01 > 0:21:02involved
0:21:02 > 0:21:05couple who owned the
0:21:05 > 0:21:11charged
0:21:11 > 0:21:24prevent
0:21:24 > 0:21:27dog control regime
0:21:27 > 0:21:31the
0:21:31 > 0:21:33owners to account and allow the dogs
0:21:33 > 0:21:36to be dangerously out
0:21:36 > 0:21:37There is
0:21:37 > 0:22:05under control. It
0:22:05 > 0:22:13importance to the
0:22:13 > 0:22:17China
0:22:17 > 0:22:24country since
0:22:24 > 0:22:34this
0:22:34 > 0:22:47this time?
0:22:47 > 0:23:09representations
0:23:09 > 0:23:12important
0:23:12 > 0:23:16think it
0:23:16 > 0:23:28enemy. When he comes
0:23:28 > 0:23:30with
0:23:30 > 0:23:37on.
0:23:37 > 0:23:45was
0:23:45 > 0:23:47Dalai
0:23:47 > 0:23:49representative
0:23:49 > 0:23:50Minister
0:23:50 > 0:23:52pressure from the Chinese
0:23:52 > 0:23:59over the Dalai Lama. The First
0:23:59 > 0:24:03Minister
0:24:03 > 0:24:15Lama
0:24:15 > 0:24:21all he did the last
0:24:21 > 0:24:32government the
0:24:32 > 0:24:36would send
0:24:36 > 0:24:41the
0:24:41 > 0:24:51Willie Rennie
0:24:51 > 0:24:59raised in
0:24:59 > 0:25:06chamber
0:25:06 > 0:25:09approach
0:25:09 > 0:25:16Government in
0:25:16 > 0:25:34point
0:25:34 > 0:25:37Minister
0:25:37 > 0:25:39people affected
0:25:39 > 0:25:42light of
0:25:42 > 0:25:49energy providers.
0:25:49 > 0:25:52efficiency programme
0:25:52 > 0:25:53saving household incomes
0:25:53 > 0:25:55over the lifetime of
0:25:55 > 0:26:08of
0:26:08 > 0:26:21They
0:26:21 > 0:26:27are no government funded
0:26:27 > 0:26:30Government
0:26:30 > 0:26:31Scottish
0:26:31 > 0:26:35poverty, does he agree with me
0:26:35 > 0:27:01to
0:27:01 > 0:27:05fuel
0:27:05 > 0:27:14there is possible
0:27:14 > 0:27:16can
0:27:16 > 0:27:25absolutely essential that once we absolutely essential that once we
0:27:25 > 0:27:49absolutely essential that once we demand.
0:27:49 > 0:28:04absolutely essential that once we quality and, will
0:28:04 > 0:28:09absolutely essential that once we told
0:28:09 > 0:28:15absolutely essential that once we That
0:28:15 > 0:28:20This Tory government cannot even This Tory government cannot even
0:28:20 > 0:28:36This Tory government cannot even have
0:28:36 > 0:28:39This Tory government cannot even England will
0:28:39 > 0:28:48This Tory government cannot even supply of. We
0:28:48 > 0:28:52This Tory government cannot even electricity. What
0:28:52 > 0:28:54This Tory government cannot even Scottish
0:28:54 > 0:29:25This Tory government cannot even with
0:29:25 > 0:29:28This Tory government cannot even
0:29:28 > 0:29:30This Tory government cannot even powers are transferred to
0:29:30 > 0:29:36This Tory government cannot even address
0:29:36 > 0:29:41This Tory government cannot even atmosphere
0:29:41 > 0:29:42This Tory government cannot even transferrin
0:29:42 > 0:29:56This Tory government cannot even Parliament.
0:29:56 > 0:30:10This Tory government cannot even sheared
0:30:10 > 0:30:20This Tory government cannot even supports
0:30:20 > 0:30:27This Tory government cannot even can
0:30:27 > 0:30:28This Tory government cannot even allowed
0:30:28 > 0:30:36This Tory government cannot even question?
0:30:36 > 0:30:38This Tory government cannot even strategy
0:30:38 > 0:30:51This Tory government cannot even that 40%
0:30:51 > 0:30:56This Tory government cannot even with
0:30:56 > 0:31:01This Tory government cannot even do
0:31:01 > 0:31:04This Tory government cannot even she
0:31:04 > 0:31:08This Tory government cannot even just
0:31:08 > 0:31:10This Tory government cannot even to the
0:31:10 > 0:31:12This Tory government cannot even her support
0:31:12 > 0:31:24This Tory government cannot even order.
0:31:24 > 0:31:25This Tory government cannot even justice in
0:31:25 > 0:31:28This Tory government cannot even made.
0:31:28 > 0:31:33the new appointments. The new the new appointments. The new
0:31:33 > 0:31:51the new appointments. The new over. In terms
0:31:51 > 0:31:52the new appointments. The new In terms of
0:31:52 > 0:31:56the new appointments. The new appointments,
0:31:56 > 0:32:05the new appointments. The new to 40%.
0:32:05 > 0:32:22the new appointments. The new record that
0:32:22 > 0:32:32the new appointments. The new financial
0:32:32 > 0:32:35the new appointments. The new cumulative savings of almost ?680.
0:32:35 > 0:32:39the new appointments. The new That same household
0:32:39 > 0:32:45the new appointments. The new benefited
0:32:45 > 0:32:53the new appointments. The new Thank
0:32:53 > 0:32:56the new appointments. The new Minister
0:32:56 > 0:32:58the new appointments. The new week
0:32:58 > 0:33:07the new appointments. The new benefits
0:33:07 > 0:33:12the new appointments. The new chamber? What
0:33:12 > 0:33:17the new appointments. The new reconcile
0:33:17 > 0:33:33the new appointments. The new not see
0:33:33 > 0:33:48the new appointments. The new Party's website
0:33:48 > 0:33:51the new appointments. The new grab
0:33:51 > 0:33:54the new appointments. The new phrase
0:33:54 > 0:34:22the new appointments. The new world.
0:34:22 > 0:34:26the new appointments. The new for
0:34:26 > 0:34:31the new appointments. The new website. The
0:34:31 > 0:34:46the new appointments. The new public, then
0:34:46 > 0:34:49the new appointments. The new Parliamentary debate
0:34:49 > 0:34:51the new appointments. The new and
0:34:51 > 0:34:55the new appointments. The new for
0:34:55 > 0:35:01the new appointments. The new to the