20/03/2012

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:28. > :00:33.Hello and welcome to Stormont Today. They say while the cat is away the

:00:33. > :00:38.mice will play but as the first and Deputy First Minister celebrated a

:00:38. > :00:41.belated St Patrick's Day, it was business as usual in the chamber.

:00:42. > :00:47.The Finance Minister has strong words for the Chancellor's regional

:00:47. > :00:52.pay idea of. It will be divisive, deflationary and it is not a good

:00:52. > :00:56.tactic economically if you want to promote growth across the whole UK.

:00:56. > :01:00.And there with a leadership race going up here but it was a

:01:00. > :01:05.different race that had our MLAs out of the chamber.

:01:05. > :01:13.And with animal welfare on the agenda, I am joined by Stephen will

:01:13. > :01:17.pot of the USPCA. New and a full welfare legislation

:01:17. > :01:21.is about to come into force in the next few weeks which is designed to

:01:21. > :01:26.provide protection for pets, working animals and livestock but

:01:26. > :01:31.there are some concerns about the changes. Stephen Philpott, you have

:01:31. > :01:35.reservations about this. It is getting very late in the day, the

:01:35. > :01:39.legislation is due a week on Saturday and we still have not

:01:39. > :01:46.clarified where the animals are going. Rescued animals will be

:01:46. > :01:51.going through some sort of third party who look after the animals

:01:51. > :01:56.but as yet no one can tell us who that is. The tender documents do

:01:56. > :02:00.not deal with how the animal is the disposed of. As a welfare

:02:00. > :02:06.organisation that is a great concern. Are there any good part in

:02:07. > :02:10.it? Yes, this is going to put Northern Ireland ahead of the game

:02:10. > :02:18.with regards to the legislation and the budgetary side of this

:02:18. > :02:23.legislation is not to be sneezed at, almost �750,000 will come from

:02:23. > :02:28.Westminster. That is a big positive but we very much need to be

:02:28. > :02:32.satisfied that this legislation will be enforced properly and the

:02:32. > :02:37.animals will be the beneficiaries not the humans. It is a big change

:02:37. > :02:46.for people, we will not be able to phone you for lost animals or

:02:46. > :02:50.cruelty to animals, is that why? is a grey area. We believe that the

:02:50. > :02:56.public will still continue to contact us. What we would have to

:02:56. > :03:02.do is read direct them. We have to ascertain what type of animal and

:03:02. > :03:08.then we will we direct them to local government to get their query

:03:08. > :03:13.sorted out. That fills us with the dread because we deal with 7,000

:03:13. > :03:19.calls a month and that brings its Channel jeers. To be direct those

:03:19. > :03:23.calls will be a big issue. With a generous pay rise coming and

:03:23. > :03:28.a day off yesterday, the agenda was packed with a double helping of

:03:28. > :03:32.questions. Four half hour sessions instead of the usual two. We will

:03:32. > :03:36.hear questions to the employment and learning Minister, but first

:03:36. > :03:42.here is the agricultural Minister being asked about reform to the

:03:42. > :03:50.single farm repayment scheme. new payment system due to its

:03:50. > :03:55.complexity could have the potential to increase the risk of fines.

:03:55. > :04:05.department over all departments has the most engagement in European

:04:05. > :04:09.funding. It is very frustrating the said policies. How they are being

:04:09. > :04:19.implemented and how you are faced with a fines. The proposals would

:04:19. > :04:21.

:04:21. > :04:26.be so hard that Ministers will find it hard to administer. Potentially

:04:26. > :04:30.moving from one payment to six would be hard to administer and you

:04:30. > :04:34.would have the commission watching every stage of that. We are in

:04:34. > :04:39.negotiation stage and we have to get this process simple as possible.

:04:39. > :04:47.Four fines could be on the way and in particular the horse mussel

:04:47. > :04:51.weeks. We are looking at a multi- million pound infraction find. Does

:04:51. > :04:57.she accept it is a failure on behalf of her department that we

:04:57. > :05:01.find ourselves in this unpleasant position? This issue has been going

:05:01. > :05:07.on for quite some time as the member is quite aware. There has

:05:07. > :05:12.been a number of actions taken in terms of increasing exclusion zones,

:05:12. > :05:18.a management plan put in place but the commission, the Queen's

:05:18. > :05:25.University report was keep in moving forward. On to employment

:05:25. > :05:30.and learning. They wanted to know if the Minister had plans for

:05:30. > :05:35.retraining outgoing present offenders. I recognise this is a

:05:35. > :05:42.particular cohort of people who have a particular set of needs. We

:05:42. > :05:47.are not talking about a redundancy situation but these are people who

:05:47. > :05:50.will have the ability to make a further contribution to the economy

:05:50. > :05:57.and the Careers Service of by department is very much available

:05:57. > :06:01.to everyone in Northern Ireland, adults included. I will certainly

:06:01. > :06:05.strongly recommend anyone in that circumstance to make contact with

:06:05. > :06:14.the careers service through their local jobs and benefits office and

:06:14. > :06:18.to make an appointment to discuss their future opportunities. Can I

:06:18. > :06:23.ask the Minister, given the vast amount of money that has been set

:06:23. > :06:27.aside for severance in this scheme, does the Minister agree that when

:06:27. > :06:31.an enhanced package like that is available, that people should not

:06:31. > :06:40.be allowed to go back into the service again? There should be a

:06:40. > :06:45.cause. It is important that we distinguish -- responsibilities and

:06:45. > :06:49.the direct command the member has asked me something my collie the

:06:49. > :06:52.Minister of Justice would be better placed to respond to. Public sector

:06:52. > :06:56.workers are holding their breath for tomorrow's Budget over plans to

:06:56. > :07:00.introduce regional rates of pay. The pilots Minister Sammy Wilson is

:07:00. > :07:05.flying to London tonight and plans to speak during the Budget debate

:07:05. > :07:10.at Westminster. I asked him to outline his objections to the idea.

:07:11. > :07:15.He has to look at what happens to benefits. Do you realise benefits

:07:15. > :07:22.because you cannot have a situation where people in work have their

:07:22. > :07:27.wages frozen and people in benefits have it improved by inflation every

:07:27. > :07:30.year. You close the gap between work and being out of work. The

:07:30. > :07:34.Government is talking about making work pay and once you start down

:07:35. > :07:39.this road you are going to hit the poorest by having to reduce

:07:39. > :07:43.benefits in areas like Northern Ireland. How do you sort out the

:07:43. > :07:50.difference in the rate of pay between the public and private

:07:50. > :07:55.sector? If you go back four yes -- years ago, private sector wages

:07:55. > :08:01.were a bar of public sector wages in many situations. For example,

:08:01. > :08:06.when I was the Minister, we could not hold on to officers. We could

:08:06. > :08:09.not hold on to a technical staff in the health service. Joiners,

:08:09. > :08:13.electricians because they were going to the private sector because

:08:13. > :08:18.wages were so good and this is a swings and roundabouts. Daybreak

:08:18. > :08:22.they get the private sector wages up is to get the economy growing,

:08:22. > :08:29.once it is growing, there will be an increase in demand for labour

:08:29. > :08:34.and that will pull the wages are. You do not get better wage parity

:08:34. > :08:39.by making the economy even poorer because in doing that you will

:08:39. > :08:44.enforce rages in the private sector, which are very sensitive to

:08:44. > :08:49.economic activity, down further. You say you will not stop this on

:08:49. > :08:53.your own, we do support industrial action? I would prefer to see a

:08:53. > :08:58.proper political debate about this. If this were debated properly in

:08:58. > :09:02.the House of Commons and all live the consequences of the it teased

:09:02. > :09:08.out, then there will be a lot of people on the benches as well as

:09:09. > :09:12.the opposition benches who realised this is a bad policy. It is not an

:09:12. > :09:17.economically sensible policy and the Government will be forced to

:09:17. > :09:22.pull it up. Is there a sense of regret that the Executive did not

:09:22. > :09:27.take control of public sector pay when it was offered? There is not

:09:27. > :09:31.because to have separate pay negotiations here in Northern

:09:31. > :09:34.Ireland would have meant we would have to set up a whole

:09:34. > :09:39.infrastructure for those negotiations which would have been

:09:40. > :09:45.costly in itself. Secondly, I think if there is a national rate for a

:09:45. > :09:49.job, whether you are a teacher in Northern Ireland or London, you are

:09:49. > :09:54.still doing the same job. It is better to have those rates agreed

:09:54. > :09:59.rather than to have devolution of them. I have no doubt that Gordon

:09:59. > :10:03.Brown offered it at that stage and we were sensitive to this. He often

:10:03. > :10:06.did because it was another way of him being able to put the squeeze

:10:06. > :10:12.of from the Treasury on Northern Ireland because he simply said,

:10:12. > :10:16.let's cut the Northern Ireland a block grant and ensured they can

:10:16. > :10:21.make the adjustment by negotiating lower wages with the public sector

:10:21. > :10:26.employees. MLAs voted through two motions on

:10:26. > :10:34.animal where fell. The first that procedures other than beds are

:10:34. > :10:38.carried out on animals. The second livestock. Prohibited procedure

:10:38. > :10:44.involves interference of the tissues and bone structure of an

:10:44. > :10:47.animal. To insure the procedures that are commonly undertaken by lay

:10:47. > :10:51.permanent -- persons remained legal, the regulations set out the

:10:51. > :10:55.procedures and which may be carried out by the lay person. The

:10:55. > :10:58.regulation will provide clarity by listing all those procedures are

:10:58. > :11:08.acceptable for a lay person to perform and also provide clarity

:11:08. > :11:12.Stephen, there was some housekeeping going on in the

:11:12. > :11:19.Chamber. Going back to an issue we saw last week, just interested to

:11:19. > :11:22.find out about the badger baiting and what sort of response have you

:11:22. > :11:29.had? There's been a massive response to the work we did with

:11:29. > :11:33.the BBC last week. Our phones have rung off the hook. People who have

:11:33. > :11:36.not spoken to the USPCA for years are keen to tell us what they have

:11:36. > :11:39.seen in the countryside and where they have seen it. Interesting news

:11:40. > :11:44.from Wales this afternoon on this ongoing debate about the badger

:11:44. > :11:50.cull? The news out of Wales late this afternoon - I was on my way

:11:50. > :11:56.here when I was text - the Welsh Assembly have decided to cancel the

:11:56. > :12:00.plan cull of badgers. They have now decided they are not going to do it.

:12:00. > :12:06.They are based that on scientific information. As a welfare

:12:06. > :12:09.organisation, we would welcome that. Thank you. It's 25 years since the

:12:09. > :12:12.first IVF baby was born here in Northern Ireland. It was timely,

:12:12. > :12:15.therefore, for members to discuss the perceived failings of the

:12:15. > :12:18.Health Service to deliver fertility treatment. They're calling on the

:12:18. > :12:22.Health Minister to fund three full cycles of IVF for couples who can't

:12:23. > :12:30.conceive, as opposed to the current one cycle. Here's the Health

:12:30. > :12:40.Committee Chair, Sue Ramsey, outlining the problem. We should be

:12:40. > :12:42.

:12:42. > :12:47.providing a cycle. The only chance to try again is to go privately.

:12:47. > :12:53.Going privately will cost people in and around �4,000. If it doesn't

:12:53. > :12:58.work, and then they try a third cycle, that is another �4,000. So

:12:58. > :13:04.in total, couples could find themselves in and around �8,000 in

:13:04. > :13:09.debt, at a time when you are trying for a baby, this can create more

:13:09. > :13:13.stress at a very emotional time for couples. What happens in practice

:13:13. > :13:19.here is the couples go for Health Service treatment and receive one

:13:19. > :13:23.fresh cycle of IVF. If it doesn't result in a pregnancy, then that is

:13:23. > :13:30.it in terms of treatment available to them. However, half of the

:13:30. > :13:35.couple also have generated frozen embryos. -- couples will have

:13:35. > :13:40.generated frozen embrie owes. The only way they can use -- embryos.

:13:40. > :13:44.The only way they can use these is to pay to have them transferred. We

:13:44. > :13:47.are on tricky moral ground here. We are creating embryos for people in

:13:47. > :13:51.the Health Service as part of the public-funded treatment. In the

:13:51. > :13:55.case of any frozen embryos being available, we are only allowing

:13:55. > :13:58.them to be transferred on the private sector. It was a short

:13:58. > :14:05.debate with little dissent, however Jim Allister did raise three points

:14:05. > :14:14.he wished to see clarified. first pertains to the fact as part

:14:14. > :14:24.of the process ultimately there is destruction of unused embryos. An

:14:24. > :14:27.

:14:27. > :14:31.embryo is biologically a human embryo, is a living human being at

:14:32. > :14:38.the earliest stage of its development. Of course it needs -

:14:38. > :14:44.it is dependent upon the mother to give it nurture and life, but

:14:44. > :14:51.genetically it is a distinct organism different from both the

:14:51. > :14:54.egg and the sperm. The second issue that I would have concerns about is

:14:54. > :15:01.the development of process, particularly in the United States,

:15:01. > :15:05.of sex selection within IVF treatment where you have that

:15:05. > :15:11.particular dimension. The Minister maybe can tell us how far, if at

:15:11. > :15:17.all, that is permitted within Northern Ireland's arrangements.

:15:17. > :15:26.The third issue which does concern me is something not referred to in

:15:26. > :15:30.the NICE guidelines, is the question of the use or abuse of IVF

:15:30. > :15:33.treatment by lesbian couples. response, the Minister, Edwin Poots,

:15:33. > :15:35.made it clear the guidelines for embryo storage and on sex selection

:15:35. > :15:38.were laid down by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology

:15:38. > :15:41.Authority and that he was personally opposed to sex selection.

:15:41. > :15:48.On same-sex couples he said the treatment was available to all

:15:48. > :15:51.eligible couples. We've heard many of the arguments for and against

:15:51. > :15:55.the plastic bag levy, environmental and economic, but what about health

:15:55. > :15:59.and safety? The Environment Committee has been hearing expert

:15:59. > :16:02.evidence on that topic and we'll hear more in a minute. But we start

:16:02. > :16:04.our look at the work of the committees with health, where

:16:04. > :16:14.members were hearing evidence on a planned private psychiatric

:16:14. > :16:19.hospital. Am I right in thinking - this new facility will not be

:16:19. > :16:24.subject to the Freedom of Information Act, unlike a Trust

:16:24. > :16:27.facility? Is that not an immediate impediment? Does that mean for

:16:27. > :16:33.instance if we were to ask a question about provision, that we

:16:33. > :16:40.would get a response saying, "This is a private company, it is none of

:16:40. > :16:45.our business." Will that cause some unease? There will be a requirement,

:16:45. > :16:48.registration includes a requirement - sorry, a requirement on a private

:16:48. > :16:52.health facility to provide the Department with such reports it

:16:52. > :16:55.requires for the purpose of its operation under the mental health

:16:56. > :17:00.order. Failure to provide that information will constitute an

:17:00. > :17:05.offence. Would that be the same as if the information had been

:17:05. > :17:13.available for a state-run institution? The same information

:17:13. > :17:18.will be provided by this facility each time someone is detained there,

:17:18. > :17:26.so a Freedom of Information will apply and any Trust who place

:17:26. > :17:30.people in this. As Christine has already said, Article 93-E provides

:17:30. > :17:34.that the Department and other bodies can obtain what information

:17:34. > :17:38.they want from a private organisation and that organisation

:17:38. > :17:46.must provide it because it is an offence not to do so. I understand.

:17:46. > :17:53.But does that mean it is available to the public under the normal way

:17:53. > :17:59.under FOI? We have the information from the private company so we

:17:59. > :18:05.can't divulge that to you? It would be my view that if the Department

:18:05. > :18:09.holds information about a private facility, we would be required to

:18:09. > :18:14.provide it. We do support the work that's been done on environmental

:18:14. > :18:19.issues in every way. However, we have a serious concern about the

:18:19. > :18:23.introduction of this charge because we see this as a potential food

:18:23. > :18:27.safety issue. We are concerned about the risk of cross-

:18:27. > :18:32.contamination and because of that risk, we sat down with our members

:18:32. > :18:35.and discussed it and decided we would get independent research

:18:35. > :18:39.carried out to establish whether there was a risk of cross-

:18:39. > :18:45.contamination, whether consumers would be put at risk of consuming

:18:45. > :18:50.food that had been put into multi- use bags and we engaged Professor

:18:50. > :18:56.McDowell on my right to carry out that research on our behalf. Just

:18:56. > :19:01.looking at the science, it is clear there is a potential significant

:19:01. > :19:11.risk of bacterial cross- contamination in relation to bags

:19:11. > :19:13.

:19:13. > :19:17.to carry hot-food items. The scientific evidence demonstrates

:19:17. > :19:24.that contact with the surface of a previously-used bag is likely to

:19:24. > :19:28.lead to the transfer of bacteria on ready-to-eat foods. Food can carry

:19:28. > :19:32.potentially dangerous bacteria but these are killed by standard

:19:32. > :19:36.cooking processes either inside or outside the home. Bacteria can

:19:36. > :19:42.recontaminate food after cooking. There is nothing to stop them

:19:42. > :19:46.getting into people and causing serious disease. Looking at the

:19:46. > :19:50.Welfare Bill, do you see a point over the next week or so that you

:19:50. > :19:55.will get clarification on what is going to happen? Or will it be put

:19:55. > :19:59.into practice and then it will be solved one way or the other? I know

:19:59. > :20:03.there are meetings scheduled over the next ten or 11 days. We think

:20:03. > :20:07.it is very, very late in the day for some of these important issues

:20:07. > :20:11.to be left this close to the deadline to be resolved. Other

:20:11. > :20:16.issues we have with the Bill are the recruitment process is now over.

:20:16. > :20:21.The new Animal Welfare Officers have been recruited. We are

:20:21. > :20:25.disappointed those people aren't from a welfare background. Animal

:20:25. > :20:30.welfare and animal control are two different tasks. As we saw in the

:20:30. > :20:35.Dogs Order, controlling dogs and ensuring for their welfare were two

:20:35. > :20:39.separate things. We need to be very sure that the legislation is being

:20:39. > :20:44.brought in and is going to be implemented for the animals'

:20:44. > :20:47.benefit, not for the Government's. Thanks very much. It was an economy

:20:47. > :20:50.and finance double header for the second half of Question Time. Golf

:20:50. > :20:52.tourism, hurling tourism, what could be next? Here's the Economy

:20:52. > :20:59.Minister, Arlene Foster, on the economic boost the Irish Open Golf

:20:59. > :21:06.Championship at Royal Portrush will bring. Let's hope she turns up at

:21:06. > :21:11.the right course! We haven't staged an event such as this for nearly 60

:21:11. > :21:20.years, so we, as a Department, are working very much in partnership

:21:20. > :21:26.with our colleagues at Royal County - that is the wrong place! The

:21:26. > :21:31.Portrush Golf Club and the council and with other partners in DRD

:21:31. > :21:35.because we realise that we need to have a delivery structure in place

:21:35. > :21:41.to ensure the effective co- ordination across all of the

:21:41. > :21:45.Departments and all of the local governments. Would the Minister

:21:45. > :21:51.agree that we should look at promoting GAA tourism in particular

:21:51. > :22:01.hurling tourism given we have some of the best hurling teams in the

:22:01. > :22:02.

:22:02. > :22:06.world in North Antrim? Order. This is certainly very focused on golf!

:22:06. > :22:11.LAUGHTER Order. Access to finance is a huge issue. This member wanted

:22:11. > :22:14.to know had all avenues been explored. Can I ask whether she

:22:15. > :22:18.feels that the introduction of a credit review office or agency

:22:18. > :22:22.which would give small businesses an opportunity to appeal

:22:22. > :22:26.unsuccessful loan applications would prove a beneficial aspect of

:22:26. > :22:31.getting businesses more access to finance? As I understand it, that

:22:31. > :22:35.is a scheme that works in the Republic of Ireland. I think the

:22:35. > :22:40.junior minister has looked at this issue in the context of the

:22:40. > :22:45.economic sub-group. It is a matter we are discussing at that sub-

:22:45. > :22:48.committee. At last, a helping hand for retailers. Together with

:22:48. > :22:53.executive colleagues, I propose to carry out a comprehensive

:22:53. > :22:56.consultation with the independent retail sector to identify areas of

:22:56. > :23:04.difficulty and develop a co- ordinated approach to helping the

:23:04. > :23:11.sector overcome these. At present, a range of advisory support to

:23:11. > :23:20.business is provided, including ICT advice. Retail businesses will also

:23:20. > :23:24.be able to benefit from the new �5 million loans fund through which

:23:24. > :23:30.three to five year unsecured loans will be available to viable

:23:30. > :23:40.businesses in all sectors. On to finance questions, and the equal

:23:40. > :23:40.

:23:40. > :23:44.pay issue. Could I ask the Minister why are PSNI staff excluded from

:23:44. > :23:49.the settlement and yet Policing Board staff are included in the

:23:49. > :23:54.settlement? Well, if I could deal with the Policing Board staff

:23:54. > :24:02.first? The Policing Board staff were not entitled to the lump sum

:24:02. > :24:07.payments. The Policing Board staff were paid in error based on

:24:08. > :24:12.incomplete information. That information later came to light.

:24:12. > :24:17.But the payments had already been made to the staff. No attempt has

:24:17. > :24:21.been made by the Policing Board to recoup that money. So let's make it

:24:21. > :24:25.something quite clear here. That payment was paid in error. There

:24:25. > :24:28.was no entitlement there. The Policing Board did not present all

:24:28. > :24:38.of the information at the time. Therefore, the payment was made. As

:24:38. > :24:38.

:24:38. > :24:46.far as the PSNI staff are concerned, the agreement that was negotiated

:24:46. > :24:50.was negotiated by Northern Ireland civil service staff, was agreed and

:24:50. > :24:56.it was only for Northern Ireland civil service staff. If the police

:24:56. > :25:00.and the police do have money for the equal pay claim, that money was

:25:00. > :25:04.negotiated and sits in the police budget at present, but the Police

:25:04. > :25:11.Service of Northern Ireland, who are the employers and who have the

:25:11. > :25:14.pay delegation have to show that there is an equal pay entitlement.

:25:14. > :25:17.The Green Party's Stephen Agnew has a bee in his bonnet about the new

:25:17. > :25:20.golf course resort near the Giant's Causeway. Mark Devenport can

:25:20. > :25:27.explain - along with the latest on the Ulster Unionist leadership

:25:27. > :25:32.campaign. Mike Nesbitt didn't make any official statement today. But

:25:32. > :25:42.it did come up in the course of a question that he was trying to ask

:25:42. > :25:43.

:25:43. > :25:48.to the Agriculture Minister. Mike Nesbitt dealt with it like this.

:25:48. > :25:54.they call me leader? Question four, Mr Speaker.

:25:54. > :25:58.Not yet! And Mark, the other leadership contender had some

:25:58. > :26:05.interesting thoughts in the newsletter today? Yes, he said that

:26:05. > :26:08.if he became leader, he would expel David McNarry from the party. He is

:26:08. > :26:13.involved in disciplinary action which is all to do with newspaper

:26:13. > :26:22.reports and talks between the Ulster Unionists and the DUP. This

:26:22. > :26:28.is what he had to say. I just think that it's run far too long and we

:26:28. > :26:34.need to bring it to a close. McNarry said he intended to clear

:26:34. > :26:38.his name in the disciplinary proceedings and he said that

:26:38. > :26:44.statement said more about the depth of his ability to unite the party

:26:44. > :26:48.than anything else. An interesting question to the Environment

:26:48. > :26:55.Minister? This is in relation to the Giant's Causeway golfing resort

:26:55. > :27:00.which was announced with so much fanfare and the Environment

:27:00. > :27:10.Minister decided that financial and tourist considerations would

:27:10. > :27:10.

:27:10. > :27:18.outweigh any environmental concerns. He's raised a question about a bee

:27:18. > :27:22.that has been seen up around that area in the dunes near Giants

:27:22. > :27:30.Causeway. Stephen Agnew is concerned lest it might be affected

:27:30. > :27:34.by this and wanted to know whether UNESCO had been informed. A

:27:34. > :27:37.conservation report is on its way but he repeats in this instance, he

:27:37. > :27:40.felt there were circumstances which outweighed the environmental

:27:40. > :27:46.concerns to press ahead. We will have to see what happens to the bee,

:27:46. > :27:49.whether it turns out to be a fly in the golfing ointment! If some of

:27:49. > :27:52.our MLAs looked a bit jaded this afternoon, it's because they ran

:27:52. > :27:54.the mile up the road to Parliament Buildings for Sport Relief at

:27:54. > :27:57.lunchtime. The DUP, Ulster Unionists and Alliance took part

:27:57. > :28:00.along with the SDLP who took silver and gold, with Conall McDevitt and

:28:00. > :28:05.his colleague Mark Durkan across the finish line well before

:28:05. > :28:09.everyone else. Mervyn Storey gets a special mention though for running

:28:09. > :28:19.the mile in his suit - and as for our political correspondent Gareth

:28:19. > :28:20.

:28:20. > :28:23.Gordon - well the pictures speak for themselves really. It is a

:28:23. > :28:28.great opportunity to raise awareness and money for a good

:28:28. > :28:30.cause and to have a bit of fun and exercise at the same time! It's

:28:31. > :28:35.good that, as public representatives, we are taking part

:28:35. > :28:39.in such things and raising the profile of causes such as Sport

:28:39. > :28:45.Relief. You are getting a bit of name for yourself with all this

:28:45. > :28:51.sporting stuff after your boxing? I'm not a good sportsman! It is a

:28:51. > :28:55.fun way to highlight a good cause. It's a good charity to back. Also,

:28:55. > :28:58.some much-needed exercise. It is a great opportunity to support a very

:28:58. > :29:05.worthwhile cause. Obviously, it is great to get out in the fresh air.

:29:05. > :29:10.It is a break to get some exercise. It is fantastic. Well done to