:00:00. > :00:09.suitable chairman of the Co-op. That is all from the BBC News at
:00:10. > :00:14.CHEERING. Celebrations in Essex tonight after
:00:15. > :00:20.campaigners defeat a plan for hundreds of new houses in their
:00:21. > :00:24.village. But some people believe nimbyism is blocking much needed new
:00:25. > :00:29.homes in this region. Hello and welcome to Look East with
:00:30. > :00:32.Susie and me. Also tonight... A rape victim appeals for help in
:00:33. > :00:38.finding her attacker a year after it happened. I will not be able to rest
:00:39. > :00:41.until I know he is caught, and justice served, and he cannot hurt
:00:42. > :00:45.anyone else. Pleased to meet you. Councillors
:00:46. > :00:48.from Suffolk and Norfolk agree to meet halfway on some council
:00:49. > :00:52.services. And tributes tonight to the
:00:53. > :00:54.legendary Cambridge scientist, Fred Sanger, who has died at the age of
:00:55. > :01:06.95. Hello. Campaigners in Essex are
:01:07. > :01:12.celebrating tonight after a controversial housing scheme was
:01:13. > :01:15.turned down by planners. It's the latest example of what some see as
:01:16. > :01:18.nimbyism blocking new home building in this region.
:01:19. > :01:25.This week, we've run two special reports on the region's urgent need
:01:26. > :01:30.for more housing. Today's vote was in the fast`growing district of
:01:31. > :01:33.Uttlesford in Essex. Over the next 20 years, the Office for National
:01:34. > :01:36.Statistics expects its population to rise by 27% to around 100,000.
:01:37. > :01:42.Uttlesford Council currently has more than 1600 households on its
:01:43. > :01:46.waiting list. It's consulting over a long`term plan to build more than
:01:47. > :01:49.2000 homes between the villages of Elsenham and Henham. In a moment,
:01:50. > :01:52.we'll hear from Richard Daniel with the campaigners. But first Alex
:01:53. > :01:58.Dunlop on the case for many more new homes.
:01:59. > :02:06.Basically a studio flat. This room, then the kitchen below. Being shown
:02:07. > :02:12.around the apartment she shares with her husband and baby. They pay ?500
:02:13. > :02:19.per month because they cannot afford to buy. She works at nearby Stansted
:02:20. > :02:27.Airport. It is not the easiest situation to be in. Would you be in
:02:28. > :02:31.favour of new homes in the area? Definitely. The same story for
:02:32. > :02:38.James, who still lives with his parents. It would be in my favour.
:02:39. > :02:44.When I have the money for a deposit, it would be perfect. This estate
:02:45. > :02:49.agents shows how much you would have to buy, up to ?500 for a
:02:50. > :02:55.four`bedroom house, and a three`bedroom house for ?1000 per
:02:56. > :03:03.month if you rented it. `` up to ?500,000. And there are plans for
:03:04. > :03:09.new homes nearby. I am afraid we need it. How not to wreck the area
:03:10. > :03:15.is the big question. Developers say that Fairfield would be sustainable
:03:16. > :03:20.and is desperately needed. Two it will have something for everybody.
:03:21. > :03:28.As well as the development, new open spaces being created. And facilities
:03:29. > :03:34.for the elderly. We are happy to support that. We have a housing
:03:35. > :03:38.problem in the district, a sad lack of affordable housing, 1600
:03:39. > :03:46.households on our list currently waiting for accommodation. They are
:03:47. > :03:53.either living with and parents, in overcrowded situations, and a
:03:54. > :03:57.desperate need for more housing. Those against the new housing one
:03:58. > :04:02.today, but that is likely to be an appeal. `` won today.
:04:03. > :04:05.So, what do the campaigners think of all that? This evening they are
:04:06. > :04:11.celebrating in the village pub. Richard Daniel is there.
:04:12. > :04:14.They are certainly celebrating in style. Campaigners have abandoned
:04:15. > :04:20.the parish meeting to drink here instead. Today, the fear was
:04:21. > :04:23.hundreds of houses between this village and nearby Elsenham would go
:04:24. > :04:30.through, but the plans were thrown out again. Campaigners lived to
:04:31. > :04:34.fight another day. Henham and Elsenham, it is not hard
:04:35. > :04:41.to see why people live here. Pretty as a picture, yet close to the M11
:04:42. > :04:45.and Stansted Airport. Villagers have fought plans to build thousands of
:04:46. > :04:50.new homes in this rural idyll. Today was the latest round in a
:04:51. > :04:58.long`running and expensive fight. Seven years and ?100,000 later, here
:04:59. > :05:05.we are, the community has been fighting this `` has been
:05:06. > :05:09.magnificent. These villages people choose to 11, paying a premium to do
:05:10. > :05:13.so, and are not averse to change, it is the sheer scale that is proposed,
:05:14. > :05:19.one that will change the very nature of the place whatever. This is a
:05:20. > :05:24.land for the first tranche of houses, 800 houses starting here...
:05:25. > :05:30.Argument is simple, everywhere should take its fair share of new
:05:31. > :05:34.housing. You opposed to any new building? Absolutely not, Elsenham
:05:35. > :05:40.has had planning permission for nearly 500 houses, in a village of
:05:41. > :05:45.some 800 houses, taking their first year. Lunchtime and protesters
:05:46. > :05:50.arrived at Uttlesford Council for the planning meeting, defiant and
:05:51. > :05:57.angry. They are going to be using land we should grow food to feed
:05:58. > :06:06.ourselves in the future. The road systems, everything else, will not
:06:07. > :06:10.call. It addresses the roads... HUBBUB. Inside, tempers flared, but
:06:11. > :06:16.then the decision campaigners wanted just over one hour later. CHEERING.
:06:17. > :06:24.The plans rejected for a second time. We are very pleased.
:06:25. > :06:31.Absolutely over the moon. I fear they will come back, like a dog with
:06:32. > :06:36.a bone. Celebrations tonight, but the fight over where these homes
:06:37. > :06:40.will go is far from over. People here are not kidding
:06:41. > :06:44.themselves, that the developers may well appeal, and what we have seen
:06:45. > :06:47.is mirrored across the region. How to deal with the thorny issue of
:06:48. > :06:49.where thousands of new homes desperately needed should go. Back
:06:50. > :06:58.to you. Thank you. Roger Humber is strategic
:06:59. > :07:01.policy adviser to the Housebuilders' Association. How bad is the
:07:02. > :07:08.situation as far as houses are concerned? We have built around 3
:07:09. > :07:15.million fewer houses than the rising population requires over the last
:07:16. > :07:18.years. The current consensus between the coalition and the Labour Party
:07:19. > :07:27.is we need these houses. We have only built 200,000, twice in the
:07:28. > :07:31.last 35 years, and most years, we have averaged about 145,000, so a
:07:32. > :07:36.massive shortage before we even start inking about the rises in
:07:37. > :07:46.population we will see over the next 10`20 years. And things like today,
:07:47. > :07:50.which some people are calling NIMBY, is making the council think again?
:07:51. > :08:01.Deal a macro councils do not like to plan long`term... `` councils do not
:08:02. > :08:05.like to plan long`term, and this government scrapped regional plans,
:08:06. > :08:10.but still said that local plans have to make provision for local housing,
:08:11. > :08:17.otherwise those will be thrown out and developers will have the right
:08:18. > :08:21.on appeal. What has gone wrong? In the short`term, we have the credit
:08:22. > :08:25.crunch and the financial crisis, eliminating a lot of effective
:08:26. > :08:29.demand, so people still need the houses but cannot afford them. We
:08:30. > :08:33.now have the government promoting Help to Buy, injecting a lot of
:08:34. > :08:39.money quickly into the housing economy. New sites being started
:08:40. > :08:43.quickly, a real upsurge, again, that has to be sustained and cannot just
:08:44. > :08:47.be on the basis of a government subsidy over three years, it must be
:08:48. > :08:53.a sustained a planned programme over the next 30 years to recover the
:08:54. > :09:01.losses over the previous 30 years. And one`shot thing they could do
:09:02. > :09:07.very quickly? `` one short thing. Developers need access to finance.
:09:08. > :09:13.We have some large builders, but small builders are doing precious
:09:14. > :09:17.little. Thank you very much. A rape victim from Essex has been
:09:18. > :09:21.speaking about her ordeal in the hope of catching the man who
:09:22. > :09:25.attacked her. A year ago today, she flagged down a car in Basildon for a
:09:26. > :09:28.lift home and was then attacked. She has been speaking to our home
:09:29. > :09:33.affairs correspondent Sally Chidzoy. Police have his BNA, but do not know
:09:34. > :09:40.his name, the victim saying she remember his huge nose and hands. ``
:09:41. > :09:45.his DNA. He locked in the car during the attack. I begged him to stop all
:09:46. > :09:51.the way through, it had boxes in the back, the clock was an hour fast. He
:09:52. > :09:59.was driving an old silver Ford focus. The victim walked along near
:10:00. > :10:03.a pub. The car stopped and she climbed in. She was driven to nearby
:10:04. > :10:07.Partridge Green, and raped in a car park in an ordeal that lasted 20
:10:08. > :10:12.minutes before she was dragged from the vehicle. It led to her decision
:10:13. > :10:15.to try to rebuild her life in Colchester, the 21`year`old saying
:10:16. > :10:21.getting in the vehicle was the biggest mistake of her life. He
:10:22. > :10:25.destroyed my faith, everything, I do not trust anyone, I cannot be in a
:10:26. > :10:29.room like a restaurant or cinema with more men than women. You are
:10:30. > :10:36.being brave and coming back and reliving your ordeal. Why is it so
:10:37. > :10:40.important to you? I will not rest until he is caught, Justice served,
:10:41. > :10:48.and he cannot hurt anyone else. We are working with Interpol, and we
:10:49. > :10:51.have circulated the profile to Interpol countries, focusing on
:10:52. > :10:57.Eastern Europe, so far with no positive hits back. He spoke who are
:10:58. > :11:03.English, they could be a delivery driver, and he is in his late 30s or
:11:04. > :11:07.early 40s and, unless he is caught, police feared he may strike again.
:11:08. > :11:10.Three men from Thetford in Norfolk have been arrested on suspicion of
:11:11. > :11:13.trafficking people to work in factories illegally. They're being
:11:14. > :11:16.held by police in Bury St Edmunds after early morning raids on four
:11:17. > :11:21.addresses in Thetford. They're also being questioned about possible
:11:22. > :11:24.money laundering offences. A couple from Suffolk who scooped
:11:25. > :11:27.?148 million on the Euro lottery are getting divorced. Adrian and Gillian
:11:28. > :11:32.Bayford from Haverhill won the Euromillions draw 15 months ago. A
:11:33. > :11:39.statement issued by Mrs Bayford today said the couple's marriage had
:11:40. > :11:43.broken down irretrievably. A little piece of history was made
:11:44. > :11:46.today on a bridge in wind and in rain. Council leaders from both
:11:47. > :11:50.Suffolk and Norfolk met on the border to agree a new partnership.
:11:51. > :11:53.They say it will mean greater co`operation in the future and save
:11:54. > :11:59.money. The unions believe jobs could be lost.
:12:00. > :12:03.It's midday and we're precisely midway between Suffolk and Norfolk.
:12:04. > :12:08.The South Folk and the North Folk are about to bond like never before.
:12:09. > :12:15.In local government terms at least. Good to see you. And you. Welcome.
:12:16. > :12:18.It started six months ago when George Nobbs was elected in Norfolk.
:12:19. > :12:22.He immediately put a call into his counterpart Mark Bee and said let's
:12:23. > :12:24.talk. And this ground` breaking deal doesn't just bridge a geographical
:12:25. > :12:28.divide, but a political one too. One's Conservative. The other
:12:29. > :12:33.Labour. Of course, this is all nice, a symbolic moment, handshake,
:12:34. > :12:38.all smiles, but what does this mean for the people relying on the
:12:39. > :12:45.services these councils provide an BM op `` and the employees that work
:12:46. > :12:50.with them? No problem with German, working together, but it could
:12:51. > :12:57.impact on jobs levels of services. `` no problems with them procuring
:12:58. > :13:01.together. The reality is that both councils are being squeezed. They
:13:02. > :13:04.need to save more than ?340 million. We all recognise protecting
:13:05. > :13:08.front`line services, protecting the most vulnerable, so we need to look
:13:09. > :13:12.at efficiencies and if you bring the back office together between county
:13:13. > :13:19.councils, the saving can be greater. The lease and health are looking at
:13:20. > :13:28.it, no Local Government has to. The new agreement says...
:13:29. > :13:33.It is ground`breaking and exciting and we hope what we are doing will
:13:34. > :13:37.be in courage to buy the government and we get some credit. The fact we
:13:38. > :13:42.are different parties does not enter our heads. It is believed to be the
:13:43. > :13:44.first County Council partnership in the country. It is, they argue, the
:13:45. > :13:58.only sensible way to go. Still to come tonight... We speak to
:13:59. > :14:02.one of our most senior women clerics as the church puts women bishops
:14:03. > :14:06.back on the agenda. Plus tributes to a giant of science,
:14:07. > :14:07.Dr Fred Sanger, whose work transformed our understanding of how
:14:08. > :14:18.genes work. MPs have been voting this evening on
:14:19. > :14:24.controversial changes to our armed forces. Under the plans, there will
:14:25. > :14:27.be a big reduction in the number of regular soldiers. And a big increase
:14:28. > :14:30.in the number of reservists. The Government was facing a possible
:14:31. > :14:34.defeat over the issue following a campaign by the Essex MP John Baron.
:14:35. > :14:38.Andrew Sinclair is at Westminster. Everyone thought this would be
:14:39. > :14:43.close, but in the last few minutes, John Baron lost his vote by 54
:14:44. > :14:47.votes, rebels seemingly bought off by last`minute government
:14:48. > :14:52.concessions or feeling that now was not the time to flex their muscles.
:14:53. > :14:55.But this is a big issue in our region with lots of military
:14:56. > :15:01.personnel and there will be other votes on this issue. John Baron says
:15:02. > :15:08.this is not the end of the matter. A few months ago, Look East filmed
:15:09. > :15:11.with reservists with the Royal Anglian Regiment training in
:15:12. > :15:16.Croatia. The government wants to rely far more on these experienced
:15:17. > :15:20.but part`time soldiers. But among MPs, there is concern whether they
:15:21. > :15:28.are up to the job and if there are enough people who want to volunteer.
:15:29. > :15:30.We risk heading towards false economies and unacceptable
:15:31. > :15:35.capability gaps which people will not thank us for. The MP for
:15:36. > :15:39.Basildon and Billericay is one, worrying it is being rushed through
:15:40. > :15:44.without proper scrutiny and debate, and others supporting, much to the
:15:45. > :15:51.annoyance of ministers. Some people in the government say you are being
:15:52. > :15:55.disloyal? As an MP, it is incumbent to speak out on matters you think
:15:56. > :16:00.are important and certain matters rise above party politics. The
:16:01. > :16:05.government says the way we fight wars is changing and we do not need
:16:06. > :16:10.as many full`time soldiers, but some, like Bob Russell, feel it is
:16:11. > :16:16.dangerous, while others feel relying on reserve this will put a big
:16:17. > :16:25.strain on small businesses. I know the damage when you take one man out
:16:26. > :16:30.of five men team in an SME and I do not think you have thought about
:16:31. > :16:35.this impact enough. But many supported the government, including
:16:36. > :16:39.one who is a reserve list. Soldiers cannot tell the difference when on
:16:40. > :16:44.the front line. We support the regular army, we know we are up to
:16:45. > :16:47.the job and now the government is committing ?1.2 billion over the
:16:48. > :16:52.next ten years to make sure we have enough and training, I know this is
:16:53. > :16:56.a great deal. This is not the end of the matter, there will be more votes
:16:57. > :17:04.on defence reforms and more opposition.
:17:05. > :17:11.Do we know how all our MPs voted? Not yet, but I expect Brian Binley
:17:12. > :17:17.on the list of Tory rebels. Others who expressed concern, and find
:17:18. > :17:22.reasons, such us may have found reasons, such as Bob Russell. But
:17:23. > :17:27.John Baron has made a name for himself and will keep up the fight.
:17:28. > :17:29.`` others who expressed concern, may have found reasons to go with the
:17:30. > :17:34.government. The Prime Minister was asked about other issues in
:17:35. > :17:38.Cambridge and he said he is listening to people's concerns,
:17:39. > :17:44.exactly what the Chancellor said to us, Ariel Fino and `` a real feeling
:17:45. > :17:49.we shall he some movement on the Cambridgeshire story very soon.
:17:50. > :17:52.Thank you very much. The Church of England could approve
:17:53. > :17:55.women bishops as early as next year after its governing body backed new
:17:56. > :17:59.proposals. Members of the General Synod voted, with 378 in favour and
:18:00. > :18:05.eight against. The Church has agreed to offer guidance to those parishes
:18:06. > :18:08.which reject female ministry. The Reverend Canon Heather Butcher
:18:09. > :18:15.is an Advisor on Women's Ministry to the Bishop of Norwich. How close are
:18:16. > :18:20.we now? We could be one year away from the final decision being made,
:18:21. > :18:29.but we have made tentative progress, this is the first hurdle, and we
:18:30. > :18:33.will have to see how it goes. It has been described as fragile, if you
:18:34. > :18:38.are betting women, which I sure you're not how fragile? I hope it
:18:39. > :18:42.will go through, but the Bishop of Rochester, who chaired the steering
:18:43. > :18:48.group, spoke on Monday and he said that there is no plan B and we are
:18:49. > :18:56.not offering a fitter, play, but we cannot afford to have this changed
:18:57. > :18:59.very much. `` they are not offering as this is accomplished. We hope it
:19:00. > :19:05.will be excepted without changing it. Some people says it could be a
:19:06. > :19:10.concession, but it looks to me like a fudge. We are trying to hold
:19:11. > :19:15.together a variety of people with different views. That is one of the
:19:16. > :19:19.great strengths and joys of the Church of England, that we are a
:19:20. > :19:23.broad church. But if you have people that think differently and have
:19:24. > :19:30.different theological understanding is, it is quite a task to hold them
:19:31. > :19:37.together, so I I suppose a bit of fudging could go on. What will
:19:38. > :19:44.happen before voting? I will meet people who are against the
:19:45. > :19:47.consecration of women bishops, to try to build bridges. I have met
:19:48. > :19:54.several people in the diocese and will continue to try to create good
:19:55. > :19:58.relationships. More broadly, the bishops are going to go away to
:19:59. > :20:02.think about how it would be rolled out across the whole church, so
:20:03. > :20:06.there is some kind of continuity across the whole of the Church of
:20:07. > :20:12.England. They will come back in February with their guidelines. And
:20:13. > :20:17.if those are proved, it then goes to the dioceses that we all have to
:20:18. > :20:23.have a say and talk about it. So long way to go? Yes, if that
:20:24. > :20:28.happens, we come back in July or November, and it may go them. And by
:20:29. > :20:34.the beginning of the year after, we might have a woman bishop? Fwe may
:20:35. > :20:41.have by 2015. Thank you very much for coming in. `` we may have won by
:20:42. > :20:43.2015. Professor Fred Sanger, the Cambridge
:20:44. > :20:48.scientist who pioneered research into the human genome, has died at
:20:49. > :20:52.the age of 95. Uniquely, he won two Nobel Prizes for chemistry. The
:20:53. > :20:55.first was in 1958 for his work on the structure of insulin. The second
:20:56. > :20:58.for his breakthrough research on DNA which laid the foundation for the
:20:59. > :21:03.de`coding of the human genome. As a young scholar. Fred Sanger
:21:04. > :21:09.described himself as above average. But nothing special. He went on to
:21:10. > :21:11.become a giant of science. His work laid the foundations for
:21:12. > :21:15.understanding and reading the structure of DNA. The building
:21:16. > :21:21.blocks of all life. I think it is difficult to compare these things,
:21:22. > :21:25.really, and to me it is very gratifying and it will be useful.
:21:26. > :21:31.Such modesty was typical of the man, whose work went on to win him two
:21:32. > :21:36.Nobel Prizes for chemistry. He was the only person in history, and
:21:37. > :21:42.still is, to have one two Nobel Prize is in chemistry, which are
:21:43. > :21:46.awarded for outstanding merit its contributions to science and to win
:21:47. > :21:51.it twice my many years apart as well is quite outstanding. Professor
:21:52. > :21:54.Sanger spent his whole scientific career in Cambridge. His name was
:21:55. > :21:57.adopted by Cambridge's Sanger Institute which first mapped the
:21:58. > :22:01.human genome. And it has helped apply its findings to the
:22:02. > :22:03.development of medicine. Fred Sanger's achievements, his legacy,
:22:04. > :22:07.will resonate in the world of science for years to come. As one
:22:08. > :22:15.fellow professor said, the impact of his work is impossible to
:22:16. > :22:19.exaggerate. Well, one man who know Fred Sanger
:22:20. > :22:24.better than most was his fellow Nobel Laureate Professor Sir John
:22:25. > :22:27.Walker. The pair worked together at the Medical Research Council's
:22:28. > :22:33.laboratory of molecular biology in Cambridge. He joins us now. Can you
:22:34. > :22:40.tell us more about Fred Sanger the man? He was wonderful man to be
:22:41. > :22:45.around, a great inspiration a fantastic experimentalists, who did
:22:46. > :22:50.very complicated experiments with complicated `` with simple
:22:51. > :22:56.equipment, and he did not like complex equipment. He preferred to
:22:57. > :22:59.invent his own ways of doing things. He had enormous persistence, he
:23:00. > :23:06.could not have solved the problems he did without that persistence and
:23:07. > :23:11.stamina. He was full of insight. He was an inspiration to everybody
:23:12. > :23:17.around him. He set a standard for other people to follow. It is hard
:23:18. > :23:26.to over emphasise how important his work was to all of us. Yes, I am so
:23:27. > :23:34.glad he was able to see the fruits of his own accomplishments in the
:23:35. > :23:38.form of the human gene on `` genome and he saw the impact it was having
:23:39. > :23:43.on biosciences, medicine, and society in general. His name will
:23:44. > :23:53.not just live for a few years to come, but whatever. And he `` you
:23:54. > :23:59.work for him, and he got you to work there, and he? Yes, we met in Paris
:24:00. > :24:06.and he asked if I thought about coming back to England and I thought
:24:07. > :24:09.I would, and so, I rang him up a few days later and as the fit would be
:24:10. > :24:14.possible to work with him in Cambridge and he agreed that I could
:24:15. > :24:21.come for three months, and that was in 1974 and I am still here. Such a
:24:22. > :24:27.modest man, but described today as one of the greatest scientists in
:24:28. > :24:33.any generation, would you agree? Absolutely, very few scientists with
:24:34. > :24:41.equivalent accomplishments, possibly Marie Curie, he could be compared
:24:42. > :24:48.with her, but otherwise unique. We will not meet another person in our
:24:49. > :24:54.lifetime again. When I met him, he was very proud to have the Sanger
:24:55. > :25:00.Institute named after him. He was, he was a modest person, wearing his
:25:01. > :25:03.fame lightly, he was famous, becoming an icon amongst students,
:25:04. > :25:09.who loved him, flocking to hear him talk, but I remember when he agreed
:25:10. > :25:12.his name could be associated with the Sanger Institute, he said
:25:13. > :25:18.something along the lines, I have allowed you to use my name, make
:25:19. > :25:24.sure this place is a success. Professor Sir John Walker, thank you
:25:25. > :25:27.very much. You are welcome. Now for the weather.
:25:28. > :25:35.The wind hazard is with us. We had a weather front through this morning
:25:36. > :25:41.bringing some and pleasant conditions. Then brighter skies, but
:25:42. > :25:46.bands of showers forming behind, affecting many areas through this
:25:47. > :25:52.evening. This poses a problem, like wind at the moment, and any gap in
:25:53. > :25:55.the showers, clear spells, means temperatures getting below freezing,
:25:56. > :26:01.was in some problems with Frost and ice, but not necessarily widespread
:26:02. > :26:08.or for the whole of the night, mainly between now and midnight. The
:26:09. > :26:17.showers falling as sleet, with a wintry flavour. After midnight, more
:26:18. > :26:22.cloud, the showers keeping going, and some wind preventing frost
:26:23. > :26:26.later. We end the night with temperatures above freezing. A
:26:27. > :26:31.cloudy start with showers around first thing, the feature will be the
:26:32. > :26:36.north`easterly wind, making it feel very cold tomorrow, but in proving
:26:37. > :26:40.through the day, starting with showers which gradually become
:26:41. > :26:43.lighter and fewer. But still some of them across the eastern half, parts
:26:44. > :26:48.of Norfolk and Suffolk particularly. Temperature is not
:26:49. > :26:55.high, seven or eight degrees. And the wind speed will make it feel
:26:56. > :27:00.very cold. By the end of the day, less showers, but still the chance
:27:01. > :27:05.of some, and falling as sleet and snow. Beyond that, high`pressure
:27:06. > :27:11.building, meaning much lighter wind, and clearer skies, so that throws up
:27:12. > :27:15.the hazard of much colder nights. Although for the next couple of
:27:16. > :27:20.nights, it is quite windy, so just about free of cost, by the weekend,
:27:21. > :27:25.we start to bring those numbers down. `` free of frost. Bringing
:27:26. > :27:31.those numbers down means some frost, possibly some freezing fog. This
:27:32. > :27:39.showers by the weekend, sunny spells, but feeling quite cold.
:27:40. > :27:41.Thank you very much, I think. That is all from us, good night.
:27:42. > :28:08.Goodbye. I'm Nigel Slater, a cook.
:28:09. > :28:12.And I'm Adam Henson, a farmer. all back in touch with
:28:13. > :28:16.where our food really comes from. You asked me to grow some
:28:17. > :28:19.durum wheat to produce your pasta. Our own eggs, our own flour -
:28:20. > :28:25.couldn't ask for more, really. # Through stormy weather
:28:26. > :28:28.and bottles of wine... #