13/10/2016 House of Commons


13/10/2016

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 13/10/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

an adjournment debate to highlight this in the future. Present`tion of

:00:00.:00:09.

Bill, Amber Road. We now cole to the first of two debates under the

:00:10.:00:15.

auspices of the Backbench Btsiness Committee, the motion in thhs case

:00:16.:00:27.

to be moved by Antoinette S`ndbach. I beg to move that this house has

:00:28.:00:32.

considered baby laws. Is an honour and privilege to open this debate. I

:00:33.:00:37.

would like to thank you for giving the use of your house to latnch Baby

:00:38.:00:46.

Lost Awareness Week, the first time this has been officially recognised.

:00:47.:00:50.

Parliament is helping to brdak the silence around the death of a child,

:00:51.:00:54.

which is the most devastating loss that can happen to any parent. Last

:00:55.:01:01.

year, a member of the Royal Court Jester and I spoke on this `nd

:01:02.:01:05.

neither of us were prepared for the huge response from parents have

:01:06.:01:09.

suffered similar losses. Thd Prime Minister, in her recent spedch,

:01:10.:01:14.

talked about tackling injustice where she founded. The scald of

:01:15.:01:18.

child lost in the UK is an hnjustice and one which is suffered bx so many

:01:19.:01:25.

families. The scale of child lost in the UK is devastating for e`ch

:01:26.:01:30.

family involved. I would like to outline the size of the problem

:01:31.:01:34.

facing appearance, then spe`k about what can be done to prevent loss on

:01:35.:01:39.

the skill we are currently facing in the UK and finally talking `bout

:01:40.:01:43.

bereavement care and best practice that can support parents through

:01:44.:01:47.

this terrible time. I want to talk about the major types of chhld lost,

:01:48.:01:52.

including miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death, although there

:01:53.:01:58.

are other areas to be looked at including ectopic pregnancids and

:01:59.:02:04.

many other specialist areas, like multiple birth pregnancies. I'm

:02:05.:02:08.

going to start with miscarrhage One in four pregnancies will end in

:02:09.:02:14.

miscarriage. This is often ` silent killer, one where parents rdceived

:02:15.:02:19.

very little support. Of the estimated 200 mothers and their

:02:20.:02:22.

families who are affected bx miscarriage every year, manx will

:02:23.:02:28.

suffer in silence and isolation And a woman has goes through three

:02:29.:02:33.

consecutive miscarriages before any investigation will be carridd out.

:02:34.:02:40.

One woman speaking of her experience after four miscarriages said, the

:02:41.:02:45.

lack of recognition of misc`rriage serves to reinforce the ide` that

:02:46.:02:49.

somehow a pregnancy didn't latter, which increases the feelings of

:02:50.:02:54.

isolation. She went on to s`y, the loneliness and isolation th`t

:02:55.:02:56.

miscarriage brings underweight can affect other aspects of lifd, hopes,

:02:57.:03:04.

dreams, decisions about work, are so difficult and yet under recognised.

:03:05.:03:09.

We need to diss mystify it `nd make it OK to talk about. One parent I

:03:10.:03:14.

know wrote this to me, before I even knew I was pregnant, I developed a

:03:15.:03:21.

butterfly rash across my chdst. My GP dismissed it as an allergic rash,

:03:22.:03:26.

no blood tests, nothing. Whdn I miscarried nine weeks later, GP

:03:27.:03:32.

cheerily said, keep trying, miscarriage is, common at r`ge. I

:03:33.:03:39.

was 37. No blood tests, feeling disheartened and dismissed, I went

:03:40.:03:44.

on to a further two early miscarriages without daring to call

:03:45.:03:49.

the GP and waste his time. @s my fourth miscarriage, I startdd

:03:50.:03:51.

looking on the Internet and approached the GP again. I `sked if

:03:52.:03:59.

it could be due to my existhng condition. Extremely unlikely, I was

:04:00.:04:04.

told. Again, no blood test, but a recommendation to quit my stressful

:04:05.:04:12.

job. I obliged. It was only at her routine hospital checked with my

:04:13.:04:15.

thyroid doctor for years later that I hear, this sounds like Q syndrome,

:04:16.:04:22.

let's do bloods tests. The hospital confirmed the diagnosis, but sadly

:04:23.:04:27.

not soon enough to save the baby I was carrying, I fifth. Happhly,

:04:28.:04:33.

after proper treatment, I bdcame pregnant again, finally givhng birth

:04:34.:04:37.

to a healthy boy on the eve of my 42nd birthday. After five

:04:38.:04:42.

miscarriages and five years of my life lost hope and grief, I still

:04:43.:04:50.

feel cheated and a little bhtter. I urge you please give miscarriage the

:04:51.:04:54.

research resources and respdct it deserves. This is just one dxample

:04:55.:04:59.

of why we need action taken to help us find the root causes of

:05:00.:05:03.

miscarriage. I'm pleased th`t earlier this year, the first

:05:04.:05:08.

miscarriage research Centre in the UK, dedicated to preventing early

:05:09.:05:15.

miscarriage opened. That centre is working with Warwick, Birmingham and

:05:16.:05:20.

Imperial NHS trusts, as well as Queen Charlotte's. The undertaking

:05:21.:05:28.

excellent research, because my sister, who has had seven

:05:29.:05:31.

miscarriages, has benefited from the work they have done and this year,

:05:32.:05:37.

she has given birth to a baby. I am thrilled for her. The coalition is

:05:38.:05:45.

there, are working and doing ground-breaking work on the Genesis

:05:46.:05:49.

Project, looking at the isstes around early miscarriage. As an

:05:50.:05:54.

example of how dedicated thd staff are, the receptionist, who had seen

:05:55.:06:00.

women walking in and out of Queen Charlotte's, organised a support

:06:01.:06:08.

group in their own time on Saturday. The coalition 's attenders,

:06:09.:06:10.

psychologists attended and doing that in their own free time. It has

:06:11.:06:16.

benefited a huge number of women. That learning has the potential to

:06:17.:06:20.

support some of the work thd government would like to achieve in

:06:21.:06:31.

of tackling our child loss rates. In 2014, 3245 stillbirths were

:06:32.:06:37.

recorded. That rate is shockingly high for a high income country. Even

:06:38.:06:42.

more frightening is the fact that the causes of 46% of stillbhrths are

:06:43.:06:48.

unknown. This is devastating for families who want answers. Ht is

:06:49.:06:52.

also unacceptable that in this day and age more is not done to identify

:06:53.:06:59.

the cause of death. When colbined with neonatal death rates, over 6000

:07:00.:07:04.

patients are suffering child lost each year. Feelings of isol`tion and

:07:05.:07:09.

loneliness are experienced by parents who suffer other forms of

:07:10.:07:18.

child laws, and the data on tackling stillbirth rates the UK 114 out of

:07:19.:07:24.

164 countries for progress hn reducing stillbirth. Justin Fowler

:07:25.:07:31.

and engaged in the digital outreach debate organised by this hotse on

:07:32.:07:36.

Monday, he put it this way, to the nurse that has had a bad dax that

:07:37.:07:40.

didn't take correct measurelents, that failed to notice a lack of

:07:41.:07:45.

growth, but chose not to look at previous records, that decided not

:07:46.:07:50.

to engage with the mother, that was instrumental in the loss of a baby.

:07:51.:07:55.

We don't want an apology, who actions were unintentional. We don't

:07:56.:08:01.

want you to lose your job. Xou need to continue in your post. In future,

:08:02.:08:05.

we know you will be more careful, you will be a model nurse, because

:08:06.:08:10.

you will know what can happdn if you have just one bad day. When you have

:08:11.:08:15.

lost their baby, you don't want to prevent retribution or compdnsation,

:08:16.:08:21.

you only want to be understood and for it never to happen again. That

:08:22.:08:26.

powerful quote reflects what so many parents have said to me, thdy want

:08:27.:08:31.

lessons to be learnt and most of all, they don't want it to happen to

:08:32.:08:36.

anyone else. In order to achieve this, there needs to be better

:08:37.:08:41.

investigation of full-term stillbirth, where no fatal

:08:42.:08:44.

abnormalities present. Therd needs to be greater willingness to discuss

:08:45.:08:51.

postmortems with parents, so that causes can be identified.

:08:52.:09:16.

Would my right honourable friend give way? She's making a wonderful

:09:17.:09:20.

speech and I'm glad to be in this debate. I'm here because of my

:09:21.:09:27.

constituent, who was one of his twin sons due to some mistakes dtring the

:09:28.:09:32.

process and he's particularly concerned that we should take on the

:09:33.:09:38.

messages in the report she was referring to about importance of

:09:39.:09:41.

learning and the importance of reviews and I just want to tnderline

:09:42.:09:44.

the point she's making and look forward to hearing from the minister

:09:45.:09:46.

what the government is doing we can do that.

:09:47.:09:51.

I am grateful for that intervention because it makes the point. Says

:09:52.:10:01.

Cameron went on to say, stillbirth rates in the UK remain high, and our

:10:02.:10:06.

current data indicates that nearly a thousand babies every year die. .

:10:07.:10:15.

The emotional cost of these events is immeasurable. When the ottcome

:10:16.:10:18.

for parents is the devastathng loss of a baby or a baby born with severe

:10:19.:10:25.

brain injury, there can be little justification for poor qualhty

:10:26.:10:29.

reviews. Only by ensuring local investigations are conducted

:10:30.:10:33.

thoroughly and with patient and external input, can we identify

:10:34.:10:39.

where systems need to be improved. Once every baby affected has the key

:10:40.:10:46.

reviewed robustly, we can bdgin to understand the causes of thdse

:10:47.:10:49.

tragedies. The pagans who engaged in the Twitter Digital debate darlier

:10:50.:10:53.

this week to raise their concerns around baby loss spoke of the need

:10:54.:10:57.

for third trimester scans and greater consistency of care during

:10:58.:11:05.

the pre-birth period, during labour and following the loss of an

:11:06.:11:12.

incident. I now want to movd on to neonatal death. I spoke of ly

:11:13.:11:15.

experiences with Sam last ydar. Parents round the country wrote to

:11:16.:11:18.

me with their experiences, some dating back many years and others

:11:19.:11:23.

more recently. One father told me about his son George. He wrote, on

:11:24.:11:28.

the 7th of November, my wifd and I were delighted when baby George came

:11:29.:11:33.

into our lives. But on the 4th of January, just days after thd

:11:34.:11:37.

Christmas festivities, our lives were rocked when our beautiful baby

:11:38.:11:42.

boy passed away in his sleep. Nothing could have prepared us for

:11:43.:11:47.

the hopelessness and feeling of loss. Each morning, waking tp

:11:48.:11:50.

wishing it was just a bad dream We watched the second is turning two

:11:51.:11:57.

hours, days, weeks and even months. Things for us felt hopeless. It was

:11:58.:12:04.

only the knowledge that our other children beaded us that kept us from

:12:05.:12:07.

drowning in self-pity. George's father went on to say that like

:12:08.:12:13.

other parents, I found everxone affected sheared similar

:12:14.:12:21.

experiences, all wanting to do something and make a differdnce

:12:22.:12:23.

That is probably why I feel I should do more. Moore is never enotgh. I

:12:24.:12:28.

know putting my spare time `nd to raising awareness of sudden infant

:12:29.:12:30.

death syndrome and raising loney for charities. Give way. I am vdry

:12:31.:12:38.

grateful. She is making an incredibly emotional speech. Two of

:12:39.:12:44.

my constituents attended a reception yesterday kindly provided bx Mr

:12:45.:12:51.

Speaker. They suffered, thex lost their baby stillborn in Scarborough

:12:52.:12:58.

Hospital, and stayed on a m`ternity ward listening to babies crxing

:12:59.:13:03.

with expectant mothers, the most tragic of circumstances. Wh`t she

:13:04.:13:06.

did following that, she started to raise money, she put her endrgies

:13:07.:13:16.

into good use, raising ?9,000 towards ?134,000 bereavement suite

:13:17.:13:20.

at Scarborough Hospital. Dods she agree that parents through this can

:13:21.:13:28.

make a difference to other people and engaged so much support through

:13:29.:13:35.

that process? I do agree, and I met her last year following on from the

:13:36.:13:39.

speech in Parliament. I know that there are so many parents lhke that

:13:40.:13:42.

want to see some good come out of the loss, and actually it

:13:43.:13:49.

demonstrates the importance of motivating those parents and

:13:50.:13:52.

allowing them to get involvdd very often because the snowdrop suite at

:13:53.:13:57.

Scarborough Hospital acts as a real reminder in the memory of their

:13:58.:14:07.

baby. I will give way. I am very grateful. Can I congratulatd her on

:14:08.:14:20.

securing this debate today? She s talking about the desire of parents

:14:21.:14:25.

to see some good from their loss, and I wondered if she would agree

:14:26.:14:30.

with me that part of that critical process is for NHS trusts where

:14:31.:14:37.

feelings have occurred to communicate on an ongoing b`sis with

:14:38.:14:43.

the parents about the actions steps being taken to ensure these

:14:44.:14:54.

tragedies are not repeated. The more they can share this information the

:14:55.:14:58.

more we are likely to achieve reductions in these rates bdcause we

:14:59.:15:03.

need to have that learning hn order to tackle what went wrong and why,

:15:04.:15:07.

and without that openness wd do not have it. In relation to the

:15:08.:15:15.

bereavement suite, Freedom of information requests I submhtted to

:15:16.:15:21.

every NHS England trust indhcated that 25% of maternity hospitals do

:15:22.:15:24.

not have bereavement suites, and I am aware that the government has

:15:25.:15:31.

done much to make funding available and action is being taken to tackle

:15:32.:15:35.

that because of the huge difference that it makes to parents. Thank you

:15:36.:15:50.

for the debate and to the honourable gentleman contributing to the

:15:51.:15:56.

debate. One in four pregnancies end in loss, and everyone in thhs House

:15:57.:16:03.

will have seen this, with staff members, family members. We want to

:16:04.:16:09.

take the opportunity to stand with those who have lost a baby `nd say

:16:10.:16:14.

we pray for peace with your family. That she acknowledged the ilportance

:16:15.:16:20.

in the grieving suite to have the church to help and assist? ,- does

:16:21.:16:32.

she acknowledge? Dorset and Bassett health trust, the midwife and

:16:33.:16:35.

Chaplin have developed an alazing suite of resources to support

:16:36.:16:41.

parents, and the information has been tailor-made to the loss they

:16:42.:16:45.

are facing, whether it is a miscarriage or stillbirth, they get

:16:46.:16:48.

information. And that has all been done in their own time and tnpaid

:16:49.:16:53.

and unsupported. Bidders th`t level of dedication at every -- there is

:16:54.:17:07.

that level of dedication. Brett Lee area that does not have this, there

:17:08.:17:11.

really that are providing the support. Like George's fathdr, the

:17:12.:17:15.

members also want to make a difference. We welcome the

:17:16.:17:18.

commitment the government h`s made to a 20% reduction in stillbirth

:17:19.:17:26.

rates by 2020, and halting those rates by 2030, and the additional

:17:27.:17:30.

resources that have been put into the perinatal mortality tool. -

:17:31.:17:36.

halving those rates. An addhtional tool we believe will help ddliver

:17:37.:17:42.

these targets. The report ydsterday identifies three key aims. Firstly,

:17:43.:17:47.

prevention. We need a sustahned public health campaign that informs

:17:48.:17:52.

parents of known risks. We know that parents of twins are three times

:17:53.:17:57.

more likely to suffer loss. Black and ethnic minority groups face much

:17:58.:18:02.

higher rates of stillbirth `nd loss. Mothers over 40, mothers living in

:18:03.:18:09.

poverty and teenage mothers all have increased risks of stillbirth or

:18:10.:18:10.

neonatal death. I am most grateful to the honourable

:18:11.:18:21.

members for executing this debate today. I would like to quotd, we

:18:22.:18:28.

don't just suffer the loss of a baby, we'll is told, a child, a

:18:29.:18:34.

teenager, birthdays, Christlas day, Mother's Day, Father's Day. The pain

:18:35.:18:38.

of losing a child never leaves you. She would like to raise that a third

:18:39.:18:44.

trimester scan would have m`de a significant difference in hdr case.

:18:45.:18:49.

I am very grateful to you for raising that point. We know that

:18:50.:18:54.

information needs to be targeted at high risk groups. Messages `round

:18:55.:19:01.

smoking during pregnancy, rhsks associated with obesity and of

:19:02.:19:06.

course, the importance of not sharing bed with your baby `nd

:19:07.:19:10.

putting them back to sleep. The success of the Back To Sleep

:19:11.:19:16.

Campaign showed what can be achieved in reducing sudden infant ddath We

:19:17.:19:23.

now need similar campaigns for stillbirth, in relation to Count The

:19:24.:19:30.

Kicks and reduced fatal movdment. It is vital that the messages `re

:19:31.:19:40.

targeted at most at risk groups in order to have the biggest ilpact. I

:19:41.:19:47.

will give way. She has given great service in raising this isste today.

:19:48.:19:56.

What I find about her comments is it's very informative to people like

:19:57.:20:04.

me, who have not experienced it and learning that one individual had

:20:05.:20:08.

five or six miscarriages before anything happened to it, and it is

:20:09.:20:15.

very enlightening for me. I think it is shocking and actually,

:20:16.:20:19.

miscarriages one of the sildnt subjects. I think there will be

:20:20.:20:24.

other members who will be speaking, or you will know of their own

:20:25.:20:30.

experiences. The second principle is around commissioning. We know the

:20:31.:20:35.

knowledge and learning is ott there, there are some inspirational NHS

:20:36.:20:40.

trusts, consultants, midwivds and chaplains that have established best

:20:41.:20:47.

practice in a hospital. Rit` Manchester clinicians, Lanc`shire

:20:48.:20:50.

and South Cumbria strategic clinical networks have developed a stillbirth

:20:51.:20:58.

specific clinical pathway. @nother trust has interviewed butterfly

:20:59.:21:01.

signs on maternity doors to alert staff when parents have lost a baby,

:21:02.:21:06.

and adapted their literaturd to make sure they receive relevant

:21:07.:21:13.

information. Abigail's Footsteps provides equipment to hospitals

:21:14.:21:18.

This work being carried out these to be shared within the NHS to address

:21:19.:21:24.

the gaps in servers where p`rents are effectively left to fend for

:21:25.:21:28.

themselves. This means that there needs to be better and more

:21:29.:21:32.

effective training by health care professionals. The fact that limited

:21:33.:21:36.

bereavement training, somethmes as little as an hour, is given to

:21:37.:21:42.

midwives before qualification is really not acceptable, given the

:21:43.:21:47.

stillbirth rates that we have. There needs to be better pre-qualhfication

:21:48.:21:51.

training, including force on first, GPs and midwives, given the

:21:52.:21:57.

statistics. There are a number of inspirational examples of good

:21:58.:22:01.

practice in the country, and this weekend, there being celebr`ted at

:22:02.:22:07.

the Butterfly Awards in Worcester. If you have good practice in your

:22:08.:22:12.

constituency, think about nominating them by next year's awards. I thank

:22:13.:22:21.

the honourable lady forgiving way, and thank her very much for bringing

:22:22.:22:25.

this debate to the house. If there's one thing we can do is break taboos

:22:26.:22:30.

and she has done that very successful, along with other

:22:31.:22:34.

members. On that, does she think it's partly because of that taboo

:22:35.:22:38.

that we have such poor training So that the more we talk about

:22:39.:22:41.

miscarriage and stillbirth, the better it will be? Yes, I cdrtainly

:22:42.:22:51.

do. Baby Last Week has been running for 30 years, but we need to make

:22:52.:22:56.

sure it affects policy, that it delivers better outcomes and that

:22:57.:22:59.

weirdos out games don't change, we hold the Secretary of State and

:23:00.:23:03.

minister to account. I know they have recognise there is a problem,

:23:04.:23:08.

but we will need to see that changing figures by 2020. I will

:23:09.:23:16.

give way. I thank her forgiving way and I just wanted to add my

:23:17.:23:21.

congratulations and also my intense respect and admiration for the way

:23:22.:23:27.

in which she has given such a moving, but also evidence -based

:23:28.:23:33.

billing to this debate. She mentioned the Butterfly Awards. A

:23:34.:23:39.

charity which offers online help for those who have lost a baby hs

:23:40.:23:44.

campaigning for a day to recognise baby loss, October 15, as wdll as

:23:45.:23:49.

the awareness. Does she think that could help to make us more `ware and

:23:50.:23:55.

also to gain greater respect and understanding for those who have

:23:56.:24:00.

suffered? I think that October the 15th is the International W`ve Of

:24:01.:24:07.

Late Day and parents across the world like candles in memorx of

:24:08.:24:11.

their children. I think there's a lighthouse in Scotland that has been

:24:12.:24:16.

let up for the first time in memory of lost children, so I do agree that

:24:17.:24:23.

if we talk about the issues and really start to drill down to the

:24:24.:24:27.

causes, we can really changd the figures that we have in the UK, and

:24:28.:24:32.

key to that is raising thesd issues here in this place. Our fin`l as to

:24:33.:24:39.

the Secretary of State for Health and the Minister is for a

:24:40.:24:43.

bereavement care pathway for parents, meaning that there needs to

:24:44.:24:49.

be an integrated service of support, including counselling for p`rents

:24:50.:24:54.

following the death of a chhld. I am very grateful that following the

:24:55.:25:02.

work of their APPG and some of the information that has come ott of the

:25:03.:25:06.

Freedom of information requdst, the Department of Health has

:25:07.:25:11.

commissioned work to start developing that pathway. But it s

:25:12.:25:15.

clear it requires clinical commissioning groups, it repuires

:25:16.:25:21.

GPs, it requires local NHS trusts and health care professionals really

:25:22.:25:26.

to recognise the need for these services and to support that

:25:27.:25:31.

pathway, working together whth the third sector, many charities... I

:25:32.:25:40.

will give way. I'm extremelx grateful and I thank her and my

:25:41.:25:44.

honourable friend in Colchester for bringing this issue into thhs

:25:45.:25:48.

chamber. A mother and father in my constituency had the nightm`re of

:25:49.:25:51.

their baby by passing away unexpectedly at home, and the baby

:25:52.:25:57.

boy was rushed to the nearest hospital, which happens to be in a

:25:58.:26:03.

different region, and the f`ct that the death was registered in a

:26:04.:26:05.

different region from where my constituents live has caused them

:26:06.:26:15.

incredible problems, not le`st in accessing counselling Kevin P. Does

:26:16.:26:19.

she agree that regional boundaries must not prevent grieving p`rents

:26:20.:26:23.

from getting the help they need and deserve? I most certainly do, and

:26:24.:26:28.

that's the kind of pewter Craddick barrier that needs to be broken

:26:29.:26:33.

down. It demonstrates so powerful array there needs to have a proper

:26:34.:26:38.

bereavement care pathway in place in every region, so it shouldn't matter

:26:39.:26:43.

where you live, as to whethdr or not you can access that support. My

:26:44.:26:54.

final intervention. An exceptionally grateful to her forgiving w`y. Would

:26:55.:26:59.

she envisage with regard to that integrated bereavement care pathway

:27:00.:27:04.

at the same level of servicd by parents who have suffered

:27:05.:27:07.

bereavement post hospital dhscharge, as other parents would otherwise

:27:08.:27:13.

receive in their own homes? I do agree, it shouldn't matter what kind

:27:14.:27:16.

of loss you have suffered, xou should be able to access th`t

:27:17.:27:21.

bereavement care pathway, whether it's in hospital or outside

:27:22.:27:31.

hospital. Finally... I'm very grateful and you've been very

:27:32.:27:35.

generous, but before you concluded your remark, as a fellow officer of

:27:36.:27:40.

this all-party group, along with yourself and the men's Burford

:27:41.:27:43.

Chichester and the member for Banbury, I wanted to commend you and

:27:44.:27:48.

the following officers on breaking the taboo, and your bravery in

:27:49.:27:53.

bringing forward this issue for debate in this house. It is so

:27:54.:27:58.

important, and as someone, ly daughter Lucy would have bedn 1

:27:59.:28:03.

this year, and when I becamd NMB 11 years ago, I was attended to, but I

:28:04.:28:09.

didn't have the bravely shedted so I just wanted to commend yot for

:28:10.:28:14.

that. I am very grateful and annual know how important this is to how

:28:15.:28:19.

the important work she has done in helping us in the all- partx group

:28:20.:28:25.

in setting out these aims and this vision, so that other parents can

:28:26.:28:32.

benefit from our experiences here. We know there are a number of

:28:33.:28:36.

brilliant charities whose energy and commitment could be brought together

:28:37.:28:44.

with NHS trusts to help delhver that care pathway that is so badly needed

:28:45.:28:48.

for appearance, such as my honourable friend. By breakhng the

:28:49.:28:58.

silence and the Tabuk of talking about child to death, the APPG

:28:59.:29:04.

composing of parents, all of whom have suffered loss, hopes that the

:29:05.:29:09.

debate will lead to better scrutiny of what is happening in matdrnity

:29:10.:29:14.

units and primary care, rel`tive to child lost. We welcome the

:29:15.:29:17.

additional focus from the government in this area, but there is lore to

:29:18.:29:23.

be done if other families are not to suffer the same grief and loss as so

:29:24.:29:29.

many parents currently do in the UK. I'm sorry, I'm going to conclude.

:29:30.:29:34.

The time has come to act and see real change in the rates of child

:29:35.:29:39.

lost. I want to thank all the charities and bereaved parents who

:29:40.:29:42.

worked with us and his expertise has helped inform this debate. @nd I

:29:43.:29:47.

know that other members will have their own personal contributions to

:29:48.:29:56.

make. Thank you. Just beford I bring in the next Bill. And not ilposing a

:29:57.:30:01.

time, but if we aim for ten minutes, then everybody will have thdir

:30:02.:30:07.

speech time and it will be dquated across the chamber. Thank you. I

:30:08.:30:15.

want to start by paying tribute to the honourable members for securing

:30:16.:30:20.

this debate is today. This hs probably the hardest speech I have

:30:21.:30:24.

ever had to write and delivdr. This week has been a tough week, as I had

:30:25.:30:33.

never heard of Baby Loss Aw`reness Week, but it has been all around me,

:30:34.:30:38.

in online discussions, commdmorative badges and a debate in the chamber

:30:39.:30:43.

today. I have struggled, debating with myself as to whether or not I

:30:44.:30:48.

should contribute in here, ht's such a personal issue. And do I want to

:30:49.:30:53.

share my very personal experiences? The absolute truth is I strtggled to

:30:54.:30:57.

talk to my family and my very close friends about it, but during the

:30:58.:31:04.

events this week, I can see a large focus is on people talking `bout

:31:05.:31:08.

their loved ones, supporting each other and making sure that when

:31:09.:31:12.

needed, important issues ard raised and addressed. I want to th`nk all

:31:13.:31:17.

my friends who have come into the chamber today to support me, as I

:31:18.:31:21.

know they know how hard this is for me. I also want to apologisd to my

:31:22.:31:30.

many friends... I also want to apologise to my many friends who I

:31:31.:31:35.

haven't told. It's not becatse I don't want to, that I don't want you

:31:36.:31:40.

to know or embarrassed, is just that I find it so hard to do so. But ever

:31:41.:31:47.

since I was elected, I alwaxs wanted to be the kind of politician that

:31:48.:31:51.

was willing to share my expdriences. Not for therapy, but to empower

:31:52.:31:57.

others and to seek to changd things for the better. Lewisham Bereavement

:31:58.:32:01.

Counselling Service Calais Tells Me There Is A Waiting List Of Tp To

:32:02.:32:04.

Four Months And This Is Not Good Enough. So I Guess Now Is The Time

:32:05.:32:12.

For Me To Talk And Pay Tribtte To My Little Angel Veronica Calais. When I

:32:13.:32:17.

Was 16 Years Old, I Became Unexpectedly Pregnant. At fhrst I

:32:18.:32:25.

was terrified and even conshdered having her adopted. But durhng my

:32:26.:32:29.

pregnancy, I became so attached I was excited, I was going to be the

:32:30.:32:35.

best mum ever. Me and my partner at the time named our baby girl

:32:36.:32:38.

Veronica. We couldn't wait to meet her. I went full term and w`s ten

:32:39.:32:44.

days overdue, so they had to induce me. I was in Labour for a long time,

:32:45.:32:50.

I was sick and tired and in a huge amount of pain. The's heartbeat was

:32:51.:33:02.

checked regularly and everything was fine. Then once I was directed,

:33:03.:33:04.

reject for a heartbeat again and they couldn't find it. This went on

:33:05.:33:07.

for about 20 minutes, checkhng different machines, because they

:33:08.:33:09.

didn't know of the equipment was broken or not. Eventually, ` doctor

:33:10.:33:13.

was called and I was rushed to the emergency room, where I had to push

:33:14.:33:18.

and forceps were used to get about. The umbilical cord had been wrapped

:33:19.:33:23.

around her throat by 20 minttes She lived for five days and we had to

:33:24.:33:27.

agree to the life machine bding turned off. I got a hold of them for

:33:28.:33:32.

the first time, and tell her heartbeat eventually stopped. She

:33:33.:33:36.

stayed alive for hours. I ndver wanted to let her go. My Baby

:33:37.:33:44.

Awareness Week is every year, 2 nd of February to the 27th of February,

:33:45.:33:50.

my five days of hard being `live. But she was never able to cry or

:33:51.:33:55.

smile, but I loved her. I still love her. She has always at my thoughts,

:33:56.:34:00.

all these years afterwards, even if I don't talk about Robert thme.

:34:01.:34:06.

That's not because I'm embarrassed, and not, is because it hurt so much

:34:07.:34:12.

to do so. After Veronica was taken from me, my coping mechanisl was to

:34:13.:34:18.

throw myself into college and work. I couldn't talk about it. Mx heart

:34:19.:34:24.

was broken. I don't have chhldren now, because I have lived whth the

:34:25.:34:27.

fear of the same thing happdning and I couldn't do it twice. But I have

:34:28.:34:33.

to say, as a young woman, going through this, I felt that most

:34:34.:34:38.

people looked at me as if I should be grateful, and I wasn't, `nd I'm

:34:39.:34:43.

not. Every organisation I ddalt with felt like they gave me that same

:34:44.:34:50.

message. Every time I wanted to do a campaign to highlight the problems

:34:51.:34:53.

that led to her life being taken away so unfairly, I was tre`ted like

:34:54.:34:59.

a child, not like a grieving mother. I was her mum. I also hoped one day

:35:00.:35:05.

that I would be her best frhend If she was alive today, she wotld be 23

:35:06.:35:11.

years old. The pain does get easier to deal with overtime, but ht never,

:35:12.:35:15.

ever goes away. I really welcome debate today and genuinely paid

:35:16.:35:20.

tribute to the members for bringing it forward, and I hope one day,

:35:21.:35:26.

nobody else as to ensure thhs pain. I want my experience to be heard by

:35:27.:35:31.

government in my constituency and across the country, who havd, or may

:35:32.:35:35.

go through this in the future, and just to see you are not alone.

:35:36.:35:45.

I hope that the whole House will read the honourable Lady's speech

:35:46.:35:55.

and will feel that she has done something incredibly brave today.

:35:56.:36:05.

And courageous. And to my honourable friend who have proposed thhs

:36:06.:36:10.

debate, nothing but the gre`test respect is due to my honour`ble

:36:11.:36:16.

friend who first spoke about this with such courage and

:36:17.:36:25.

straightforwardness. All our thoughts are with her and all the

:36:26.:36:29.

other parents who have suffdred these terrible losses. I do not

:36:30.:36:36.

think it is possible having heard the honourable lady, I know it is

:36:37.:36:39.

not possible. For anyone who has not suffered the unbearable tragedy of

:36:40.:36:45.

the loss of a child to trulx understand the grief and pahn and

:36:46.:36:52.

the hopeless feeling is that it must involve, and I must congrattlate my

:36:53.:36:58.

honourable friend is on sectring this very important debate on this

:36:59.:37:07.

issue. I would like to speak about two issues. First of all a wonderful

:37:08.:37:11.

charity with whom I have worked for the last 15 years, and which is very

:37:12.:37:19.

close to my heart, and which I greatly admire. I am patron of the

:37:20.:37:27.

charity group B strep support. I became aware of the charity in 003

:37:28.:37:34.

when the founder and chief dxecutive came to see me, remarkable women.

:37:35.:37:43.

And she met with me to raisd the issue. Jane and her husband Robert

:37:44.:37:51.

lost their middle son to a group B strep infection in 1996, less than

:37:52.:37:55.

one day after he was born. H learned that group B strep is the c`use of

:37:56.:38:04.

the most -- most common cause of meningitis in babies under three

:38:05.:38:10.

months, and also causes sepsis and pneumonia. It is truly shocking that

:38:11.:38:14.

on average one baby a day in the United Kingdom develops grotp B

:38:15.:38:19.

strep infection, one baby a week dies from a group B strep infection

:38:20.:38:23.

and one baby every two weeks survived with long-term

:38:24.:38:28.

disabilities. And even more shocking is that most Group B infecthons in

:38:29.:38:36.

babies and should be prevented. -- can and should be prevented. The

:38:37.:38:42.

wider family then live with the consequences of their baby's

:38:43.:38:45.

unnecessarily horrible illndss for the rest of the lights. I h`ve to

:38:46.:38:53.

say, I will give way. He will know of the case of Fiona and Scott, my

:38:54.:39:01.

constituents, whose son Edw`rd tragically died at just nind days

:39:02.:39:08.

old from a group B strep infection, and as devastated as they wdre and

:39:09.:39:11.

still are, they have channelled that grief into campaigning work and that

:39:12.:39:15.

petition which has reached nearly quarter of a million signattres

:39:16.:39:17.

Will he agree with me that there is an urgent need for a more consistent

:39:18.:39:21.

and effective screening and that the risk factor strategy by which we

:39:22.:39:25.

have assessed this infection to date has failed to reduce the nulber of

:39:26.:39:30.

incidences should be reviewdd? I agree and I am grateful to him for

:39:31.:39:36.

speaking to me last night, `nd look forward to working with him on this

:39:37.:39:40.

terrible illness, and indeed to join him in presenting this petition when

:39:41.:39:46.

it comes along. I want to s`y to my right honourable friend, who is

:39:47.:39:49.

going to answer this debate, who is not only my right honourabld friend

:39:50.:39:52.

but also a real friend. What I have to say is not due in a disrdspectful

:39:53.:40:00.

way to him, but I do have what can only be described as issues with the

:40:01.:40:05.

Department of Health on this matter. I represented this issue to the

:40:06.:40:11.

government of both complexions, and it has been an uphill, unrewarding

:40:12.:40:18.

unloading experience. From `n adjournment debate by the rhght

:40:19.:40:22.

honourable friend, a former Prime Minister, the former member for

:40:23.:40:28.

Whitney, on the 9th of July 200 , I have dealt with five ministdrs, all

:40:29.:40:33.

of whom have promised prompt action and progress, all of which have been

:40:34.:40:37.

an acceptably slow, for reasons which I am the charity and the

:40:38.:40:43.

families involved, and mothdrs to be, I think would find pretty hard

:40:44.:40:47.

to understand in any objecthve examination. The campaign h`s been

:40:48.:40:52.

pushing since 2003 for the dnriched culture medium test to be available,

:40:53.:40:56.

and I would like my right honourable friend to note that the govdrnment

:40:57.:41:00.

committed to making these tdsts available on the NHS from the 1st of

:41:01.:41:05.

January 2014, following a mdeting that we had with Dan Boulter, that

:41:06.:41:12.

then minister, the Chief Medical Officer, in December 2012, only to

:41:13.:41:18.

-- for the government to do a U turn on the decision in the final weeks

:41:19.:41:24.

of 2013. Despite these setb`cks and these dismal patterns of indecision,

:41:25.:41:32.

I want to congratulate the group on all they have achieved on r`ising

:41:33.:41:35.

awareness of this terrible `nd unnecessary infection since they

:41:36.:41:40.

were founded in 1996, and ensuring that the issue is at least on the

:41:41.:41:44.

agenda, even if they do nothing about it, the key decision lakers.

:41:45.:41:49.

The charity has one overarching objective, to eradicate grotp B

:41:50.:41:53.

strep in newborn babies, to achieve that objective, which is military in

:41:54.:41:56.

its clarity and position thdy inform and support families affectdd by

:41:57.:42:04.

group B strep, and push for improvement. The charity has

:42:05.:42:07.

virtually single-handedly r`ised awareness of group B strep from

:42:08.:42:12.

virtually nothing to one in ten of every new and expectant mothers

:42:13.:42:22.

having heard bid -- in 2006, to one in five in 2016. Amazing th`t the

:42:23.:42:26.

NHS does not routinely provhde information about it as part of

:42:27.:42:30.

standard antenatal care, whhch makes it a significant feature for a small

:42:31.:42:36.

charity to cover for an inexplicable shortcoming on the part of the

:42:37.:42:40.

National Health service. From the very start they have pushed for

:42:41.:42:44.

improvement to policy and practice, and I think they have done `n

:42:45.:42:49.

extraordinarily good job. In my own view, the reason for this

:42:50.:42:56.

shortcoming is that I think there is a fundamental disagreement between

:42:57.:42:58.

doctors, and we all know wh`t that means. It is not clear to md why

:42:59.:43:03.

ministers do not just simplx overrides this. Test would save the

:43:04.:43:12.

agony of those involved. I know the government say they are comlitted to

:43:13.:43:15.

finding a way forward, but ht is taking them a very long timd to get

:43:16.:43:20.

there and neither I nor the charity are satisfied by the progress. As he

:43:21.:43:28.

winds up today, could I ask him to give particular mention to group B

:43:29.:43:37.

strep, and confirmation that they will be listened to in the future.

:43:38.:43:42.

One other matter, to raise one point, the most wonderful young

:43:43.:43:49.

constituent of mine, an adorable girl, Emily, aged 14, came to see me

:43:50.:43:55.

at my surgery ten days ago with her mother. Emily is a miracle child who

:43:56.:44:06.

survived two strains at the age of 18 months. I will be sending my

:44:07.:44:09.

right honourable friend the details of her case and the wider c`se for

:44:10.:44:14.

dealing with childhood strep, which needs to achieve greater

:44:15.:44:20.

understanding. Strep is one of the top ten reasons children did. An

:44:21.:44:24.

alarming number of children who have had a stroke are misdiagnosdd or are

:44:25.:44:30.

sent home. Like all members of Parliament, there is no gre`ter

:44:31.:44:33.

honour or privilege than we can have to raise the case of a child's story

:44:34.:44:41.

on the floor of the House and how remarkable courage and survhval I

:44:42.:44:44.

would be grateful if he would examine carefully the inforlation I

:44:45.:44:47.

will be sending him from Emhly and her family. Thank you. I am deeply

:44:48.:44:54.

honoured to participate in this debate on an issue which cotld not

:44:55.:44:59.

be closer to my heart. I am grateful to the cross-party group on baby

:45:00.:45:04.

loss for bringing this forw`rd. As we have heard, the loss of ` baby is

:45:05.:45:08.

what every parent dreads. And those to whom it occurs at a provocatively

:45:09.:45:15.

changed for ever, their livds scarred by unspeakable tragddy. The

:45:16.:45:18.

year before I was elected I had no notion that I would ever have the

:45:19.:45:21.

honour of being elected to represent the good people of North Ayrshire.

:45:22.:45:27.

Because of my own horrific experience of stillbirth, I feel

:45:28.:45:31.

profoundly that I use that experience to help shine a light on

:45:32.:45:35.

the issue which is truly thd last taboo. For too long, too many of

:45:36.:45:40.

those to whom this has happdned understandably did not feel able,

:45:41.:45:45.

did not feel equal to the t`sk of speaking out about this isste, and

:45:46.:45:50.

in turn, those who have no direct experience of this issue silply do

:45:51.:45:53.

not know how to broach it and are very often surprised to find out how

:45:54.:46:01.

prevalent stillbirth is across the UK. Around 3500 BBC shear across the

:46:02.:46:11.

UK and another 3000 die shortly after birth. -- 3500 babies each

:46:12.:46:17.

year. That is one baby everx hour and a half, the equivalent of 1

:46:18.:46:20.

jumbo jets crashing every ydar. It is inconceivable that this should

:46:21.:46:27.

continue. But it will unless we remove the taboo and shine ` light

:46:28.:46:31.

on this novel phenomenon and do all we can for the mums and dads of the

:46:32.:46:37.

future and all the babies ydt to be born. It is sobering to think that

:46:38.:46:42.

in the course of this debatd, somewhere in the UK, two more little

:46:43.:46:50.

babies will have died, two families destroyed. It does not bear thinking

:46:51.:46:56.

about. But think about it wd must. Yes, it is extremely diffictlt to

:46:57.:47:00.

talk about this, but we havd a duty to all the babies who have been lost

:47:01.:47:04.

and a duty to all those berdaved parents who are struggling to put

:47:05.:47:09.

the pieces of their lives b`ck together. The fact is, in Scotland

:47:10.:47:16.

34% of stillbirth is our babies at full pregnancy, and in Engl`nd that

:47:17.:47:20.

figure is 33%. This is shocking when you consider that medics at all

:47:21.:47:24.

levels will tell you that b`rring some terrible freak accident, no

:47:25.:47:29.

baby who has survived up full pregnancy need die. -- a full

:47:30.:47:35.

pregnancy. Not if the proper monitoring and procedures are in

:47:36.:47:40.

place. And yet such babies to die. In Scotland some progress h`s been

:47:41.:47:43.

made in recent years to redtce the incidences of stillbirth, btt we

:47:44.:47:49.

still do not compare favour`bly with our European neighbours, across the

:47:50.:47:54.

UK we still have a long way to go. I know, as many others do, thd horror

:47:55.:48:00.

of losing a baby. My baby Kdnneth would have been seven years old this

:48:01.:48:04.

Saturday. The very day when we reach the culmination of baby loss

:48:05.:48:07.

awareness week. International pregnancy and infant

:48:08.:48:17.

loss awareness Day, is a rax of light for all of our babies. When

:48:18.:48:23.

children lose their parents, they are called orphans. When a husband

:48:24.:48:28.

loses his wife, he is called a widow and when a wife loses a husband she

:48:29.:48:33.

is called a widow. When pardnts choose their -- lose their child,

:48:34.:48:37.

there is no name for it and the reason is, there are no words. It

:48:38.:48:43.

goes against nature. And all those who knew and loved them, can share

:48:44.:48:47.

memories such as the last holiday, the last Christmas, the last

:48:48.:48:52.

important family milestone but it is not like that with stillbirths soak

:48:53.:48:58.

people understandably don't know what to say, sometimes people are so

:48:59.:49:01.

keen to avoid saying the wrong thing, that they see nothing at all.

:49:02.:49:06.

I have heard reports of womdn after a stillbirths, crossing the note

:49:07.:49:12.

from their labours, to avoid speaking to them such is thd anxiety

:49:13.:49:16.

about saying the wrong thing because there is no right thing to say.

:49:17.:49:22.

There simply are no words, just a deafening silence and a terrible

:49:23.:49:26.

sense of being utterly isol`ted in consuming grief. Like so many

:49:27.:49:32.

parents have lost their babhes, my husband and I wanted by the loss how

:49:33.:49:38.

we expect our lives to be after five years of fertility treatment. We are

:49:39.:49:43.

haunted by the potential life wiped away so cruelly and suddenlx. By the

:49:44.:49:49.

avoidable. By the fact that all of avoidable. By the fact that all of

:49:50.:49:54.

this grief and sense of waste was because the Southern General

:49:55.:49:58.

Hospital in Glasgow, now called the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital,

:49:59.:50:03.

made a series of basic errors. By the fact that this same hospital

:50:04.:50:08.

pulled down the shutters and 46 and a half years refused to recognise

:50:09.:50:12.

that any mistakes were at all. And to this day have still not done so.

:50:13.:50:18.

And by the fact that this s`me hospital despite independent expert

:50:19.:50:21.

flatly contradicting them, hnsist they did nothing wrong. And this

:50:22.:50:27.

matters, it matters because this is an all too common story, and

:50:28.:50:32.

demonstrate an unwillingness to openly engage in a learning process

:50:33.:50:43.

when mistakes are made. And that shows a real culture, fear dven if

:50:44.:50:48.

you cannot accept that mist`kes have been made. How many parents, go

:50:49.:50:56.

through this horrific ordeal. As they are told this is just one of

:50:57.:51:00.

those things as they are trxing to cope with the crushing weight of

:51:01.:51:04.

grief. And bereavement care for parents is simply not good dnough.

:51:05.:51:12.

Some have done very important work in this field, they underst`nd the

:51:13.:51:15.

importance of listening to lother 's concerns and they found that all of

:51:16.:51:19.

the mothers surveyed who had undergone a stillbirth, 45% of them

:51:20.:51:23.

helped that something was wrong before problems were diagnosed yet

:51:24.:51:28.

to many of these women were told that their concerns were unfounded,

:51:29.:51:32.

sent home, only for their b`bies to die shortly after. Antenatal care

:51:33.:51:39.

must be a collaborative process mother 's concerns must be paid

:51:40.:51:43.

attention to, women know thdir own bodies. We must have better

:51:44.:51:47.

monitoring of pregnancies and particularly those women at risk of

:51:48.:51:55.

experienced stillbirth or ndar Nato -- neonatal birth. The truth is we

:51:56.:52:00.

are failing to realise any babies at danger. And we need more research to

:52:01.:52:04.

help us tackle this issue. The more we know about why the babies are

:52:05.:52:08.

dying, the warm more we can mitigate for this happening. And it hs very

:52:09.:52:13.

important that if mistakes `re made and remember one in three

:52:14.:52:18.

stillbirths are full-term b`bies, health boards and trusts should not

:52:19.:52:23.

be investigating themselves, for investigations to be credible they

:52:24.:52:28.

have to be independent. Carried out by people outside a situation. That

:52:29.:52:33.

is the right and proper thing to do to challenge this culture of

:52:34.:52:37.

secrecy. Where it is believdd to be merited, we should in England allow

:52:38.:52:42.

coroners to investigate stillbirths so that errors in care can be

:52:43.:52:46.

addressed where they have occurred and in Scotland is the equivalent

:52:47.:52:51.

would be a fatal accident enquiring. I know these are not straightforward

:52:52.:52:56.

or easy asks but such an investment now will mean that has expertise

:52:57.:53:00.

grows and intelligence is g`thered, increasing need for such me`sures

:53:01.:53:08.

will increase over time. . She also agree that local authorities need to

:53:09.:53:12.

take this into account on the registration of deaths. I h`ve heard

:53:13.:53:15.

cases where people have gond to register deaths, the same place

:53:16.:53:21.

where you register births. @nd that was very upsetting for thosd

:53:22.:53:26.

parents. I take on board was the honourable gentleman says is an

:53:27.:53:28.

extremely traumatic experience to register the death, at the same

:53:29.:53:34.

place where people register births, it simply makes the spirit `bout

:53:35.:53:40.

dramatic. In my own case, mx notes recorded that I was asked if I

:53:41.:53:44.

wanted a postmortem performdd on my son. My notes did not record who

:53:45.:53:50.

asked me this question, what information I was given, or when I

:53:51.:53:56.

was asked this question. I was so drowsy on morphine intensivd care,

:53:57.:54:00.

since my liver have ruptured after my body tried for 48 hours to

:54:01.:54:03.

deliver my baby naturally and the hospital repeatedly refused to

:54:04.:54:09.

perform a C section, I have no idea if I was asked this question. Why

:54:10.:54:14.

was the common session not properly recorded in my notes. It is all

:54:15.:54:19.

pretty suspicious as it feeds into the sense of cover-up and evasion in

:54:20.:54:26.

hospitals in such circumstances I am delighted that we are finally

:54:27.:54:30.

putting this very important issue firmly on the political agenda and

:54:31.:54:35.

that is where it must stay. For those of us in the chamber `nd those

:54:36.:54:39.

of us outside the chamber, `ll of the grieving parents watching today,

:54:40.:54:44.

it is too late to save our little boys and girls. But there are little

:54:45.:54:48.

boys and girls, other peopld thinking of starting their own

:54:49.:54:52.

families, for whom it is not too late. It is our duty to do `ll that

:54:53.:54:58.

we can to ensure that these little boys and girls and to the world as

:54:59.:55:04.

safely as possible. It is otr duty to commit ourselves to the cause for

:55:05.:55:08.

our sakes and for the sakes of all of the babies that will be lost and

:55:09.:55:18.

never forgotten. Thank you Lr Deputy Speaker, it is the honour to

:55:19.:55:21.

co-chair the all Parliament`ry group on baby loss, and to listen to the

:55:22.:55:26.

member who is an active member of the group. I would just likd to

:55:27.:55:30.

share some statistics, some of which have been shared with the house but

:55:31.:55:34.

I think repetition is important in this case so we have a real

:55:35.:55:38.

understanding of the scale. One in four pregnancies ends in

:55:39.:55:43.

miscarriage. One in 200 babhes is stillborn in the UK. Around 15

:55:44.:55:48.

babies died per day, either before, during or shortly after birth in the

:55:49.:55:53.

UK. There are around 3500 stillbirths every year in the UK.

:55:54.:55:59.

Half of all is to births ard said to be preventable. The rate sthllbirth

:56:00.:56:04.

in the UK is higher than Poland and Estonia. The lives of 2000 babies

:56:05.:56:10.

could be saved every year if the UK could match the best surviv`l rates

:56:11.:56:17.

in Europe. Mr Deputy Speaker, it is I think a great honour to follow all

:56:18.:56:21.

of those honourable and right Honourable members, who havd shared

:56:22.:56:25.

such harrowing accounts of what has happened to them. I would lhke in

:56:26.:56:32.

particular to praise, I did want to appear patronising in anywax, how

:56:33.:56:35.

proud I am of the honourabld member. And a good friend of mine for

:56:36.:56:40.

raising that account in such a powerful and emotional way. I want

:56:41.:56:46.

to make absolutely clear th`t I genuinely believe, that we `re doing

:56:47.:56:50.

something very special in this chamber today because we ard

:56:51.:56:53.

breaking a silence, breaking it to boo and we are showing parents up

:56:54.:56:58.

and down this country that ht is OK to talk about the babies and the

:56:59.:57:02.

children that we have lost. In fact it is more than OK, where wd feel we

:57:03.:57:07.

are able to, we should. And I had that people across this country seat

:57:08.:57:10.

that in the mother of all parliaments there is no subject that

:57:11.:57:13.

we won't abate or talk about if it is going to improve the livds of

:57:14.:57:21.

others. I would be delighted to I would like to congratulate him also

:57:22.:57:25.

to bring forward this debatd and this point about inspiring people to

:57:26.:57:30.

come forward. Two constituent of mine, that is what happened to them,

:57:31.:57:34.

their son was born after 23 weeks and six days. He lived for two and a

:57:35.:57:41.

half days further. Had he not live those are the two and a half days,

:57:42.:57:46.

he would have been considerdd a miscarriage rather than a short

:57:47.:57:51.

life. Does he consider, you cannot measure grief in how is, in days, in

:57:52.:57:57.

weeks. Does he not consider, in these days, we should reconsider the

:57:58.:58:02.

time, the criteria that we `pply for when a life is considered a life?

:58:03.:58:08.

Yes, I thank my honourable friend fray much for this contribution

:58:09.:58:12.

This is something that the `ll Parliamentary party group is looking

:58:13.:58:16.

at. He's absolutely right when he says how important it is th`t those

:58:17.:58:20.

who do suffer what is termed a miscarriage but let us be clear it

:58:21.:58:25.

is a life and a baby. Because of our abortion laws had all sorts of rules

:58:26.:58:29.

and regulations, where not `llowed to register that light and give that

:58:30.:58:35.

baby name. It is something that we are looking at. I would be delighted

:58:36.:58:42.

to. The following on this point if I may, the baby was born at 23 and a

:58:43.:58:47.

half weeks, sadly she had not lived, if she had she would be rushed

:58:48.:58:52.

straight to the baby care unit, the special care baby unit. But because

:58:53.:58:58.

she was born dead, although I always class as a stillbirth. Officially it

:58:59.:59:02.

was put down as a miscarriage, and I was not given a death certificate.

:59:03.:59:06.

It was another trauma on top of the trauma I have already gone through,

:59:07.:59:11.

because then on paper, it rdad miscarriage, she was blessed by the

:59:12.:59:17.

chaplain, went on to have a funeral which I felt was right. I hdld in my

:59:18.:59:22.

arms, she was a fully formed baby. I think it does have two addrdssed.

:59:23.:59:29.

Indeed, I absolutely agree `nd the honourable lady, for Washington and

:59:30.:59:33.

Sutherland East. I would also like to thank you for the huge role that

:59:34.:59:37.

you play on the all Parliamdntary party group and indeed on the

:59:38.:59:40.

formation of the group. Comhng back to the point on the importance of

:59:41.:59:46.

today, we are really lucky `nd I hope you agree, we have the best job

:59:47.:59:51.

in the world. I believe that where we can, we have a duty and

:59:52.:59:54.

responsibility to take the clearances. Experiences to lake a

:59:55.:00:05.

lot and the lives of others better and it through this debate, we can

:00:06.:00:10.

ensure, that we can in the fullness of time reduce the stillbirth rate

:00:11.:00:15.

and neonatal death rate by 40%, then that is an incredible target to aim

:00:16.:00:20.

for. And we can save the lives of 2000 babies. I congratulate him and

:00:21.:00:29.

other members for being so brave and speaking out in this debate. Friends

:00:30.:00:33.

of mine who were due to havd twin sadly lost one of their twins due to

:00:34.:00:38.

twin to twin trance fusion syndrome, and I'll see agree that it hs so

:00:39.:00:42.

important that all of the after care for parents who have lost b`bies

:00:43.:00:46.

that we consider the very dhfferent nature, of four example multiple

:00:47.:00:52.

births and ensure, that card is tailored appropriately to every

:00:53.:00:58.

circumstance. Absolutely and the honourable lady makes a verx good

:00:59.:01:02.

point. There are charities that do incredible work in this field

:01:03.:01:05.

indeed. One of my honourabld friend is raised this earlier too. I would

:01:06.:01:13.

be delighted to. The thank xou, I just wanted to follow on from that

:01:14.:01:17.

question with regard to mothers who experience late term baby loss, and

:01:18.:01:24.

the treatment that they recdive in hospitals. Very often they `re kept

:01:25.:01:28.

on maternity wards which can be incredibly traumatic so the point

:01:29.:01:31.

about tailoring carer and stpport for parents who lose their children,

:01:32.:01:38.

is remaining on the maternity ward, the most suitable space for people?

:01:39.:01:44.

I thank the honourable lady and I will come onto that honourable

:01:45.:01:48.

point, I would just like to share my own personal experience. Ag`in in

:01:49.:01:54.

the spirit of showing peopld outside of this chamber, we found ott at our

:01:55.:02:01.

20 week scan that our son h`d a very rare chromosomal disorder c`lled

:02:02.:02:06.

Edwards syndrome. The reality is, that is unhelpfully describdd as a

:02:07.:02:09.

condition that is not compatible with life. We knew throughott that

:02:10.:02:15.

the most likely outcome would be stillbirth at some point. Btt our

:02:16.:02:20.

son was an incredible littld fighter, he went full term, over 40

:02:21.:02:25.

weeks, he lost his life in the last few moments of labour at Colchester

:02:26.:02:32.

General Hospital. But I wanted to pick up on the honourable l`dy's

:02:33.:02:36.

point. In Colchester we havd a fantastic hospital that has a

:02:37.:02:40.

special bereavement suite c`lled the Rosemary suite where we got to spend

:02:41.:02:44.

some really special time, wd knew what the likely outcome sadly was

:02:45.:02:45.

going to be. I got to stay there overnight with

:02:46.:02:59.

my wife, we had a cold cot so we could have a lot of cuddles and we

:03:00.:03:03.

got to stay here with them. I completely agree with you, we

:03:04.:03:07.

brought this debate in Novelber last year on bereavement care in

:03:08.:03:10.

maternity units because berdavement suites are so important. Thdre

:03:11.:03:13.

should never be any excuse hn this country within the NHS for lother

:03:14.:03:19.

and father or mother who has lost a baby to go back onto water with a

:03:20.:03:28.

crying babies and happy famhlies and balloons because it is not

:03:29.:03:33.

appropriate. What you need hn that moment is peace and quiet to come to

:03:34.:03:37.

terms with the tragedy that has just happened. I would like to

:03:38.:03:42.

congratulate him and the Honourable lady and all others who havd been

:03:43.:03:46.

involved in this group. When my child died to three years ago at

:03:47.:03:51.

term, we did not have the bereavement suite in Leicester. We

:03:52.:03:56.

do now. The issue is not just the ability to be able to grievd and be

:03:57.:04:02.

with your child, it is also getting expert help and counselling at that

:04:03.:04:06.

moment. Because my wife was told she would never have children again

:04:07.:04:11.

after the stillbirth, we have had two children subsequently. Ht is so

:04:12.:04:15.

important to get that advicd at that time, does he agree? Yes, of course

:04:16.:04:20.

I agree and I will come onto this point later in my speech. From that

:04:21.:04:25.

debate in November on bereavement care in maternity units, I know the

:04:26.:04:31.

honourable member and I werd taken aback with the number of people

:04:32.:04:35.

across the country who were sharing their stories with us that got in

:04:36.:04:40.

touch. And at that point, wd sat down, during a finance bills are

:04:41.:04:45.

around 1:30am with the then care quality Minister, the member for

:04:46.:04:53.

Ipswich, alongside my friend who is not quite in her place, and the

:04:54.:04:58.

honourable lady for Washington and Sunderland East, and we thotght

:04:59.:05:01.

this is a far bigger issue than just bereavement suites. And babx loss is

:05:02.:05:05.

a whole subject that needs addressing. We were surprisdd there

:05:06.:05:13.

was not a group already looking at this area. So the Parliamentary

:05:14.:05:16.

group was formed in Februarx and I'm very proud of the work we h`ve been

:05:17.:05:19.

done so far, working with some amazing charities across thhs

:05:20.:05:26.

country. I cannot agree -- H cannot begin to name some because H would

:05:27.:05:30.

have to name them all. The charities that are large and do amazing

:05:31.:05:34.

fundraising through to the groups of just a handful of people who get

:05:35.:05:35.

together with each other in a local together with each other in a local

:05:36.:05:46.

pub or village hall and knit little pieces of clothing for babids who

:05:47.:05:49.

are premature and sadly losd their lives. It means so much that so many

:05:50.:05:53.

people want to make a difference. I cannot let this speech code by

:05:54.:06:00.

without also referencing thd support of the Speaker of the House, not

:06:01.:06:05.

allowing us kindly to use hhs allowing us kindly to use hhs

:06:06.:06:10.

apartments for the reception yesterday, and very kindly drawing

:06:11.:06:17.

baby loss awareness week, and yesterday what should have been my

:06:18.:06:22.

son's second birthday, to ask a question on this subject at PMQ 's.

:06:23.:06:24.

And to raise this issue in front of And to raise this issue in front of

:06:25.:06:27.

millions of people and the country's media. I think this is a debate . Of

:06:28.:06:36.

course. I know he does not want to name individual charities that

:06:37.:06:41.

Sadlers do a great job. One of the issues that has been raised is that

:06:42.:06:46.

one of the most powerful thhngs that they can do is put parents hn touch

:06:47.:06:51.

with parents, people who have gone through their expenses can share.

:06:52.:06:55.

Does he agree that that is ` very powerful thing to do in terls with

:06:56.:06:59.

this, a lot of people can elpathise with what people are going through

:07:00.:07:03.

but unless you have gone through it does, it is difficult to understand.

:07:04.:07:08.

He raises an incredibly good point. In the run-up to pregnancy we have

:07:09.:07:12.

groups like NTT and prenatal classes, -- MCT, I agree and the

:07:13.:07:18.

friends that we have made who have gone through similar experidnces,

:07:19.:07:24.

but you feel you can go through this with them because they have gone to

:07:25.:07:27.

the same things and that is right powerful. There is a role that's

:07:28.:07:32.

charities and the NHS can play in where parents feel able to, putting

:07:33.:07:36.

them in touch with other parents who may want to talk about their

:07:37.:07:40.

experience. I want to talk `bout the government targets. I know sometimes

:07:41.:07:45.

the government gets hard tile in relation to the NHS. In this area,

:07:46.:07:49.

this is something that they have accepted the premise of what we are

:07:50.:07:52.

arguing for. I will the first arguing for. I will the first

:07:53.:07:57.

meeting with the right honotrable friend, the number four Ipswich as

:07:58.:08:02.

care quality Minister, and ht was like pushing against an open door.

:08:03.:08:08.

We now have these very firm commitments, reduction by 20% by the

:08:09.:08:12.

end of this Parliament, and 50% by 2030. It is our job as an all-party

:08:13.:08:17.

Parliament regrouped to hold the government's speech to the fire and

:08:18.:08:21.

make sure make sure they ard working towards those and also that we start

:08:22.:08:29.

to see results. I could not let this debate go by without talking about

:08:30.:08:32.

some of these issues that the charities have raised with le, I

:08:33.:08:35.

will firstly touch on prevention and then talk about bereavement.

:08:36.:08:39.

Research in this area is absolutely vital. And as my good friend the

:08:40.:08:44.

honourable member for edits preset, around 50%, in fact 46% of

:08:45.:08:58.

stillbirth are unexplained. So why are South Asian women 60% more

:08:59.:09:01.

likely to have a stillbirth Chris Maguire? -- why is there a disparity

:09:02.:09:14.

between some part of the UK, 4. % in some areas and 7.1% in another area.

:09:15.:09:21.

That is a 25% variation. We need to look at multiple pregnancies, as I

:09:22.:09:26.

know my honourable friend h`s mentioned. We need to look `t lower

:09:27.:09:31.

income families, look at our European counterparts and sde why

:09:32.:09:34.

they are getting its own right and see how we can implement those

:09:35.:09:39.

measures here in the UK. -- C White they are getting it so right. A

:09:40.:09:40.

number of members have menthoned number of members have menthoned

:09:41.:09:46.

public and they are right to do so, whether it is maternal age, smoking,

:09:47.:09:54.

alcohol drugs. We could achheve a 7% reduction if no women smoked during

:09:55.:09:58.

pregnancy. This is a huge t`rgets to achieve. We can do a lot of work on

:09:59.:10:02.

smoking cessation around prdgnancy. The Bay City, around 12% -- in

:10:03.:10:11.

obesity, we could reduce it by 2% if no mothers were overweight or a

:10:12.:10:14.

piece. There is work we can do around in powering women and mothers

:10:15.:10:22.

to be. In initiatives like count the kicks, nobody knows their body like

:10:23.:10:26.

a mother. If they feel something is wrong, there is a good chance there

:10:27.:10:30.

is something wrong. When yot pick up the phone to the hospital or to your

:10:31.:10:34.

GP and it is dismissed as, do not worry, it is not important, no, get

:10:35.:10:38.

it checked out. If there is nothing to worry about, great. All those

:10:39.:10:42.

times we do not get it checked out and something terrible happdns, we

:10:43.:10:46.

have to hold ourselves responsible for that. Some of the innov`tion

:10:47.:10:49.

that is happening around in powering women, for example, these f`ntastic

:10:50.:10:58.

folders are being sponsored by Teddy's Wish, anyone who has had a

:10:59.:11:01.

baby knows that you get these maternal notes that you havd to

:11:02.:11:08.

carry around. These folders that these maternity notes go income it

:11:09.:11:11.

encourages mothers and fathdrs to look out for the signs, and when to

:11:12.:11:18.

pick up the phone and go to your GP and go to the hospital. This

:11:19.:11:21.

innovation is what we should be looking at. Investigation and

:11:22.:11:24.

reporting. It is so important that we learn the lessons from every

:11:25.:11:28.

single stillbirth and neonatal death. The days of covering things

:11:29.:11:33.

up and treating it as unexplained, these things happen, I am tdrribly

:11:34.:11:36.

sorry, it is not accidental and we have to learn from every single one.

:11:37.:11:40.

I am pleased that the government has put significant amount of money into

:11:41.:11:44.

setting up a system of reporting so we can absolutely investigate and

:11:45.:11:47.

learn from every single stillbirth and neonatal death. My honotrable

:11:48.:11:54.

friend mentioned postmortems. She is absolutely right to do so. So many

:11:55.:12:00.

parents do not get offered the opportunity to have a postmortem.

:12:01.:12:03.

What parent would want that opportunity? But the one ovdrriding

:12:04.:12:06.

factor for parents who lose children is often that they want to know why.

:12:07.:12:10.

They want to have an understanding of how it happened, and why it

:12:11.:12:14.

happened and how we can makd sure it does not happen again. So m`ny

:12:15.:12:18.

parents would opt for a postmortem so that they know that rese`rch can

:12:19.:12:26.

Help others. And if clinici`ns are not asking, often with good

:12:27.:12:29.

intentions because it is not an easy question, but we have to ask that

:12:30.:12:33.

question because we need to get that research done to cut our sthllbirth

:12:34.:12:41.

rates. I cannot member which member mentioned late stage pregnancy

:12:42.:12:46.

scanning. In this country, we do not scan past 20 weeks. We scan at 2

:12:47.:12:52.

weeks and 20 weeks. There is no routine scanning past that `nd I

:12:53.:12:56.

find that quite bizarre, if I am honest. About halfway through your

:12:57.:13:00.

pregnancy you get an abnorm`lity scan, but after that, you are not

:13:01.:13:04.

seen again in terms of us c`n until you arrive at the hospital hn

:13:05.:13:11.

labour. If we were to look `t other countries across the world, but in

:13:12.:13:15.

particular let in Europe who do scans at 36 weeks or Doppler scans,

:13:16.:13:20.

there are huge implements wd can make in that area. I want to make

:13:21.:13:29.

one point clear. Around prevention, the NHS is brilliant and whdre we

:13:30.:13:32.

get it right in this countrx, we really get it right. The problem is

:13:33.:13:35.

the level of inconsistency `cross the NHS in the UK. And part of this

:13:36.:13:38.

work, and I know the Secret`ry of work, and I know the Secret`ry of

:13:39.:13:42.

State and the Minister will agree when I say this, is that we have

:13:43.:13:45.

some of the best care in thd world but the important point is that is

:13:46.:13:49.

repeated in every hospital `nd every maternity unit in the country.

:13:50.:13:54.

Having that consistent level of care so whichever hospital or GP you are

:13:55.:13:57.

in, you will get the same ldvel of care and consistent advice. Even if

:13:58.:14:04.

we do manage to achieve our target, even if we do half our stillbirth

:14:05.:14:10.

rate, match our European counterparts and reduce our

:14:11.:14:14.

stillbirth rate by 50%, that is still going to mean somewhere

:14:15.:14:18.

between 1500 and 2500 parents going through this personal tragedy every

:14:19.:14:24.

year. That is why as part of the all-party Parliamentary grotp, we

:14:25.:14:26.

put as important an emphasis on bereavement. I have talked `bout

:14:27.:14:32.

consistency of care across the NHS and is very much feeds into that

:14:33.:14:36.

point. We should have consistency of bereavement pathway care across the

:14:37.:14:40.

NHS as well. It is important that we look at things like training for

:14:41.:14:44.

staff. I know the Secretary of State and the Minister has put huge amount

:14:45.:14:46.

of funding into training as part of of funding into training as part of

:14:47.:14:53.

this plan to reduce stillbirth rates significantly because trainhng is

:14:54.:14:57.

to my honourable friend for his part to my honourable friend for his part

:14:58.:15:01.

in securing this debate. I have mentioned already my constituents

:15:02.:15:04.

who had the nightmare of losing their baby boy, I asked the mother

:15:05.:15:09.

to write to me to set out what precisely had happened and one of

:15:10.:15:12.

the most harrowing part of `n already harrowing story was when she

:15:13.:15:17.

told me that at the hospital, she was not given, she and her husband

:15:18.:15:20.

were not allowed to stay with the little boy for long. They wdre

:15:21.:15:24.

pressured to leave. And when to leaving the baby boy, she w`nted to

:15:25.:15:29.

go back to give her last goodbye, she was refused, she collapsed to

:15:30.:15:34.

the floor, and the officials around her said, that if she did not get

:15:35.:15:39.

up, she would have to go in a wheelchair or a stretcher. @s it was

:15:40.:15:46.

time to go. Good God. Does ly honourable friend agree that

:15:47.:15:47.

kindness costs nothing, and there is kindness costs nothing, and there is

:15:48.:15:50.

a duty on anyone whether in the NHS or in the police, to make stre that

:15:51.:15:55.

they are dealing with parents in this situation, that they do it with

:15:56.:15:58.

kindness and that is very mtch part of the way they behaved? Yes, she

:15:59.:16:05.

raises a point and I only whsh that raises a point and I only whsh that

:16:06.:16:09.

the disgraceful behaviour and storage she has related to le was

:16:10.:16:15.

unique but it is not. Storids I have read and personal testimony I have

:16:16.:16:19.

heard sadly echoed those experiences. I think this is exactly

:16:20.:16:24.

what we need to address. Yot are quite right, this is why tr`ining is

:16:25.:16:27.

so important and we have midwives and clinicians trained around

:16:28.:16:32.

bereavement. Language to usd, what not to say, I will not even repeat

:16:33.:16:34.

some of the things that are set to some of the things that are set to

:16:35.:16:43.

parents who aren't -- who are grieving. In our case it was not a

:16:44.:16:46.

huge shock but for many pardnts this is something that has happened

:16:47.:16:49.

instantly almost and I had no idea this was coming. They are are at the

:16:50.:16:54.

most emotionally fragile period in most emotionally fragile period in

:16:55.:16:58.

their life and it costs nothing to act with kindness, empathy `nd

:16:59.:17:01.

compassion. I would like to think that we can reach a point where

:17:02.:17:05.

those are things that are rtnning through every maternity unit in a

:17:06.:17:08.

country and an over vast jollity it is, but where we have -- I know the

:17:09.:17:15.

vast majority it is, but whdre it is not, we have to change this. We have

:17:16.:17:21.

to have a bereavement suite in every hospital in the country, we have to

:17:22.:17:24.

have bereavement trained midwives in every hospital in the country, we

:17:25.:17:28.

need those gynaecology trained counsellors in every maternhty unit

:17:29.:17:32.

in the country. And we also need that ongoing mental health support.

:17:33.:17:33.

The time at which you leave the The time at which you leave the

:17:34.:17:37.

hospital is not the end of xour grief. For many people it is just

:17:38.:17:42.

the start. When it comes to future pregnancies, that can be ond of the

:17:43.:17:43.

most traumatic pregnancies because most traumatic pregnancies because

:17:44.:17:46.

you are thinking, from the day you will find that you are pregnant to

:17:47.:17:50.

the day you have got a crying baby in your arms, is this going to

:17:51.:17:53.

happen again? What mental hdalth support is available? In sole parts

:17:54.:17:58.

other parts, it simply is not. And other parts, it simply is not. And

:17:59.:18:04.

finally, I just want to touch on two other points. One is relationship

:18:05.:18:11.

support. We know that betwedn 8 and 90% of relationships break tp after

:18:12.:18:14.

social cost as well so that mental social cost as well so that mental

:18:15.:18:19.

health support is so import`nt. I also think, and partly the reason

:18:20.:18:23.

why I am co-chair of this Parliamentary group is that the

:18:24.:18:26.

voice of fathers has to be heard as well. The father that feel that they

:18:27.:18:30.

have to act as a rock. But hn many cases we were there as well,

:18:31.:18:34.

witnessing it and there is nothing, there is nothing, no experidnce in

:18:35.:18:41.

my view, worse than seeing xour wife gives birth to a lifeless b`by. It

:18:42.:18:45.

is something that never leaves you. And every single day I think about

:18:46.:18:49.

my son, I think about what he would have been like yesterday on his

:18:50.:18:53.

second birthday, I imagine ` small boy running around our housd,

:18:54.:18:57.

causing havoc, winding up hhs sisters. It is not to be. Btt every

:18:58.:19:01.

single day you live in that grief. Fathers need support to.

:19:02.:19:11.

This is a hugely exciting thme for us because the opportunity for

:19:12.:19:16.

change is enormous, the APPG is making enormous progress and work we

:19:17.:19:25.

have done already vision documents, and what we have achieved shnce

:19:26.:19:28.

there be working with these magnificent charities all across the

:19:29.:19:32.

country, with individual spdeding in their personal experiences, has been

:19:33.:19:38.

incredible. And this is just the beginning of this journey. This is

:19:39.:19:42.

just the point that we have set our vision and aspiration and what we

:19:43.:19:44.

want to achieve and I know that pushing against an open door with a

:19:45.:19:47.

government, they want to achieve these targets to. I just want to

:19:48.:19:55.

send one final message to every single parent that is bereaved up

:19:56.:19:58.

and down the country and we care and we are going to keep talking about

:19:59.:20:02.

it and were not get it stopped talking about it until we rdduce our

:20:03.:20:06.

stillbirth rate and most importantly that we have the best quality

:20:07.:20:10.

bereavement care in the world, thank you. Thank you Mr Deputy Spdaker and

:20:11.:20:17.

it is a pleasure to follow the honourable member for Colchdster, is

:20:18.:20:21.

excellent and passion contrhbution. Of course this is such a sensitive

:20:22.:20:27.

and important subject and I want to congratulate the honourable members

:20:28.:20:29.

for securing this debate at this very important week. And for

:20:30.:20:35.

speaking about their own personal experiences. I also want to pay

:20:36.:20:40.

tribute, to the very brave honourable members, who share their

:20:41.:20:44.

personal experiences, with such eloquence today. My honourable

:20:45.:20:52.

friend, the member for Lewisham Deptford, and North Ayrshird and

:20:53.:20:56.

Arran, and my very good honourable friend, the member for Washhngton

:20:57.:21:03.

and Sunderland West. In Hull, the levels of stillbirth and neonatal

:21:04.:21:06.

death are higher than the n`tional average and there is so much more as

:21:07.:21:09.

we have heard already that needs to be done but I want to put on record

:21:10.:21:13.

my tribute to the excellent work of the hull and East Yorkshire route in

:21:14.:21:20.

supporting parents and I also but to the trust under the inspirational

:21:21.:21:26.

readership -- leadership Fr`ncine Bates. But today I want to go back

:21:27.:21:36.

to the issue, about injustice. We know that the trauma of the loss of

:21:37.:21:40.

a baby can also be compounddd by what happens next. And I want to

:21:41.:21:47.

tell you the story of my constituents, my Cantina Trow Hill.

:21:48.:21:51.

Who came to see me to tell le about what had happened to them. They

:21:52.:21:55.

explained that their baby Whlliam, had very sadly died in 1994, a long

:21:56.:22:02.

time ago. And they had been told at the time that when he was cremated

:22:03.:22:09.

there would be no Ashes. Many, many years later, Tina discovered that

:22:10.:22:14.

baby William's caches had in fact been retained, never been rdturned

:22:15.:22:19.

to her, and somebody had sc`ttered them without her knowledge. This was

:22:20.:22:26.

very sad and bewildering. Why would somebody do this. It soon bdcame

:22:27.:22:31.

very apparent that this was not a very sad one-off incident. Tina has

:22:32.:22:35.

worked relentlessly in Hull and the wider Hull area to help manx other

:22:36.:22:40.

families who have also discovered that their baby 's ashes were either

:22:41.:22:44.

not return to them or scattdred without their knowledge, or there is

:22:45.:22:47.

still a mystery as to where the ashes are now. She, set on, the

:22:48.:22:59.

local ashes group, it now h`s 4 0 members. She has discovered that

:23:00.:23:03.

many families were told that there would be no Ashes when their baby

:23:04.:23:07.

was cremated, many families were told this by clinicians and nurses

:23:08.:23:12.

in the NHS, many families now have discovered that those ashes were

:23:13.:23:18.

scattered. Over 50 sets of `shes are still held by the co-operathve

:23:19.:23:24.

funeral service, and have not been returned to families. There are

:23:25.:23:28.

cases coming to light where babies appear to have been transported to

:23:29.:23:31.

the crematorium without the use of an undertaker. And Tina herself has

:23:32.:23:39.

helped families submit forms to the local authority, seeking information

:23:40.:23:43.

about what happened to thosd babies. She submitted over 50 such requests

:23:44.:23:50.

so far. And it is quite cle`r now that this has not just happdned in

:23:51.:23:55.

Hull but up and down the cotntry, it has happened in Scotland and in

:23:56.:24:00.

Shrewsbury. And is Rosebery, the local authority rightly, held an

:24:01.:24:03.

enquiring to find out what had happened and to get those answers

:24:04.:24:11.

for local families. So in Htll, Tina and I decided that we would see Hull

:24:12.:24:16.

City Council and asked run independent enquiring just `s they

:24:17.:24:20.

had had in Shrewsbury and while initially sympathetic, the Council

:24:21.:24:25.

decided no. They wouldn't bd willing to hold such an enquiring. We

:24:26.:24:33.

challenge them on this, sayhng it wasn't just OK for the local

:24:34.:24:38.

authority to investigate itself But no, they said they weren't willing

:24:39.:24:43.

to have that local enquiring. So I raised it with the previous Prime

:24:44.:24:47.

Minister David Cameron. And I asked him what he thought about it and he

:24:48.:24:52.

expressed to me that actually, it must be dreadful not to know what

:24:53.:24:55.

has happened to your baby 's ashes and something should be dond.

:24:56.:25:00.

Eventually Tina and I went to see the Justice Secretary, the Right

:25:01.:25:04.

Honourable member for Surrex Heath. And I think he was genuinelx moved

:25:05.:25:12.

by Tina's plight, and the m`ny families in Hull who did not know

:25:13.:25:17.

what had happened. Tina madd it very clear to the Justice Secret`ry, what

:25:18.:25:20.

she wanted to see was a loc`l enquiring to get the answers to what

:25:21.:25:27.

had happened. And on the 10th of May the Justice Secretary wrote on Baha

:25:28.:25:30.

Provencal, Secretary of State for Health and the Secretary of State

:25:31.:25:35.

for the Department for Commtnities and Local Government and sahd this.

:25:36.:25:40.

"I'm Pleased to be a will to tell you that my fellow secretarhes of

:25:41.:25:44.

State at the Department of Health and communities and local government

:25:45.:25:49.

have agreed with me that thdre is a need for a historic investigation

:25:50.:25:53.

into the practices relating to infant cremations for the whole

:25:54.:26:01.

area. And today, we have asked them to commission this. Well, you can

:26:02.:26:06.

imagine, we were delighted to have that, and to have three secretaries

:26:07.:26:10.

of state acknowledge that, those families deserve to know wh`t had

:26:11.:26:16.

happened. That was excellent news, and I was delighted that thd

:26:17.:26:19.

Secretary of State decided to do that. However, there were two

:26:20.:26:24.

issues, rightly so that rem`ined of concern. One was the jurisdhction

:26:25.:26:29.

point, it wasn't just about the local council who had responsibility

:26:30.:26:33.

for the crematorium, it was also about the national Health Sdrvice

:26:34.:26:35.

and the role that they playdd, and the training needs and anything else

:26:36.:26:37.

that might come out of any Inquiry. There was also an hssue

:26:38.:26:47.

about private funeral directors and how they would be compelled to be

:26:48.:26:51.

part of any investigation, so it was quite clear that there were some

:26:52.:26:54.

issues that needed to be addressed. And the other issue that I did have

:26:55.:26:59.

quite a lot of sympathy with, was about the cost of holding an

:27:00.:27:03.

independent enquiring. We know that enquiries and be expensive `nd we

:27:04.:27:06.

know that both councils are under enormous financial pressure at the

:27:07.:27:13.

moment. So I supported, Hull City Council, in returning to thd

:27:14.:27:17.

Department of Justice and asking for cavitation on those two points.

:27:18.:27:21.

Jurisdiction and whether thdre was any financial help availabld. That

:27:22.:27:24.

all seem to be going well, H thought they were genuine issues to deal

:27:25.:27:31.

with. However on the 26th of December 2016, the new Justhce

:27:32.:27:35.

Secretary wrote to Hull Citx Council, saying that she thought it

:27:36.:27:40.

was now no longer any need for an enquiring. This letter was not

:27:41.:27:45.

copied to me or my constitudnt, and I only became aware of it bdcause

:27:46.:27:49.

the Chief Executive of Hull City Council sent a copy to me. H had to

:27:50.:27:55.

say on behalf of my constittents and many families in Hull, I am furious

:27:56.:27:59.

that a decision made by thrde secretaries of state, was jtst

:28:00.:28:06.

completely overturned with no consultation, or any kind of

:28:07.:28:15.

attempt, to consult with me or my constituent, my constituent as you

:28:16.:28:20.

can imagine is devastated. @nd when I read the letter from Hull City

:28:21.:28:25.

Council, it said that they had carried out investigations, they

:28:26.:28:27.

were satisfied that everythhng had been done as it could be done.

:28:28.:28:34.

Reading the letter it was also clear that they had not engage fully with

:28:35.:28:39.

the problems around the NHS and the funeral directors and is certainly

:28:40.:28:42.

hadn't engaged fully with the families. In recent years, we have

:28:43.:28:46.

become very much more an opdn country and we are less willing to

:28:47.:28:52.

take the word of trust and `uthority figures. Organisations left to

:28:53.:28:54.

investigate themselves, rardly see the need for independent scrutiny of

:28:55.:28:59.

their actions. You only havd to look at cases like Hillsborough.

:29:00.:29:04.

Organisations that investig`te themselves almost always find

:29:05.:29:07.

nothing much wrong and no one answerable for any error th`t is

:29:08.:29:13.

ever owned up to. Nothing to see here, go away, move on, could be the

:29:14.:29:19.

motto of that culture. Now ht nearly 100 families in Hull coming forward,

:29:20.:29:23.

they are not just going to go away and accept that they will not get

:29:24.:29:26.

the answers to the questions they are asking about the ashes of their

:29:27.:29:31.

deceased babies and what happened. A proper independent enquiring, run

:29:32.:29:36.

from outside Hull City Council, that at a proper independent Inqtiry As

:29:37.:29:41.

to whether or not more could be learned is the least that they

:29:42.:29:48.

deserve. Without the lessons of the past learned, there will be less

:29:49.:29:54.

confidence, as to whether rdforming practices in the crematoriul by

:29:55.:29:58.

ministers will be enough. I do not understand why the Secretarx of

:29:59.:30:01.

State for Justice, what she had to gain by closing down the prospect of

:30:02.:30:04.

proper independent scrutiny of what went wrong in Hull. In this week in

:30:05.:30:11.

particular, I would just ask the Minister to put himself in the shoes

:30:12.:30:16.

of those families in Hull, who want answers and justice. And thdre are

:30:17.:30:21.

three key demands. First of all I believe that my constituent ought to

:30:22.:30:25.

receive an apology from the Secretary of State justice `nd I

:30:26.:30:28.

think she ought to give her the courtesy of a personal meethng just

:30:29.:30:32.

as the previous Secretary of State did. And thirdly, I think the

:30:33.:30:35.

independent investigation as to what happened to the baby ashes hn Hull

:30:36.:30:40.

should be reinstated forthwhth, with funding from the government to

:30:41.:30:44.

ensure that this enquiring can go ahead. -- this Inquiry. What an

:30:45.:30:54.

honour it is to follow that speech, from the Honourable Lady from

:30:55.:30:57.

Kingston Uppal Hull. We havd looked closely together on difficulties

:30:58.:31:03.

relating to infant cremations. And I very much listened with intdrest as

:31:04.:31:07.

to what she had to say todax. When my son died I was told by otr

:31:08.:31:11.

consultant that one day it would be possible to put my grief in the box

:31:12.:31:15.

and only open the box when ht suited me. The sea at the time I thought

:31:16.:31:20.

she was completely insane. Now I realise it is possible to h`ve an

:31:21.:31:23.

element of control over lifting the lid on public although not when I

:31:24.:31:26.

have exercise particularly well today. -- not one. Over the years I

:31:27.:31:33.

have talked about my experidnces, raising money for mental he`lth

:31:34.:31:35.

charities and I have learned that nothing opens those wallets quicker

:31:36.:31:45.

than tears. I have also, talked to midwives, they are used emotional

:31:46.:31:49.

mothers, it is an honour to be Vice chair of this APPG and to h`ve been

:31:50.:31:54.

thereat its conception, one very late night in the tearoom. We have

:31:55.:31:57.

well and truly lifted the lhd this week in Parliament which is an

:31:58.:32:02.

achievement itself. But just as importantly we have succeeddd in

:32:03.:32:06.

enlisting both health and Elma J Minister certainly to date, to our

:32:07.:32:08.

cause. The Secretary of State's emotion was obvious to all `nd I was

:32:09.:32:17.

piece to see him earlier. The charitable fundraiser in me did

:32:18.:32:21.

wonder if next year we should ask a well-known tissue manufacturer tiffs

:32:22.:32:26.

to sponsor this debate next year. In brief, during my third pregnancy, my

:32:27.:32:39.

son died soon after he was born and for some time it was not all if I

:32:40.:32:45.

was surprised. To put it into context, my father slipped from this

:32:46.:32:48.

place at a time of enormous difficulty from the governmdnt which

:32:49.:32:52.

shows clearly it was considdred serious, my condition was vdry

:32:53.:32:55.

serious. I went on to have two more children aged 15 and 13.

:32:56.:33:00.

With your permission I would like to touch on learning points from my own

:33:01.:33:06.

experience, then about some of the work we have done in the APG this

:33:07.:33:13.

year, them finally make somd points about maternity going forward. The

:33:14.:33:18.

learning points from my own expect out of date but sadly not all of the

:33:19.:33:23.

things have been put right, obviously physical care comds first

:33:24.:33:27.

in maternal and baby death hs a real possibility but someone needs to be

:33:28.:33:30.

tasked with the mental care of the whole family as the death of the

:33:31.:33:35.

baby leaves deep scars in so many in his or her relations. Memorhes,

:33:36.:33:40.

clothes and photos make a rdal difference later, however mtch they

:33:41.:33:43.

seem like frippery at the thme. Putting bereaved mothers in with my

:33:44.:33:46.

babies is not on, however ill they babies is not on, however ill they

:33:47.:33:51.

are. Explaining what is going on all the time is critical, and m`de new

:33:52.:33:55.

to be done many times to different family members. Medical conditions

:33:56.:34:01.

has to be understood by those suffering. Midwives, as my

:34:02.:34:07.

honourable friend said, need more than one hour of bream and training

:34:08.:34:10.

and they also need training on how to have grown-up conversations on

:34:11.:34:15.

things like lactation which are utterly lacking in my experhence.

:34:16.:34:20.

Training all obstetric staff is so important because so many p`tients

:34:21.:34:25.

go on to have more children, GPs and other health workers also nded to be

:34:26.:34:29.

aware of the long-term effect of baby loss. It is difficult to go

:34:30.:34:33.

back to the hospital with whatever condition in the future, let alone

:34:34.:34:37.

want to do with pregnancy. Where possible, parents should not have to

:34:38.:34:41.

do to tell and we tell their story at every important. The syndrome I

:34:42.:34:46.

list suffered from Leeds to multiple organ failure, so not being a doctor

:34:47.:34:50.

and not understanding what hs wrong with me now, if I have a minor

:34:51.:34:56.

condition and go to the doctor means I have to go through the whole story

:34:57.:35:01.

again. The simple flag on mx notes would be easy to do so is every time

:35:02.:35:04.

I have my blood pressure taken I have to retell everything. Fathers,

:35:05.:35:10.

as my honourable friend mentioned, get ignored. We need proper evidence

:35:11.:35:15.

of the effects of babies piling on relationships. We have some evidence

:35:16.:35:20.

that we have touched on -- babies dying on relationships. This is not

:35:21.:35:27.

good enough. May I read frol this Lancet article, fathers reported

:35:28.:35:31.

feeling added knowledge is ` legitimately grieving parents. The

:35:32.:35:35.

burden of these men keeping feelings to themselves increase the risk of

:35:36.:35:39.

chronic grief. Differences hn the grieving process stream pardnts can

:35:40.:35:44.

lead to incongruent grief, which was reported to cause serious

:35:45.:35:48.

relationship issues. Affect on grandparents should also be

:35:49.:35:51.

considered. In the case of ly own parents, they had to cope whth a lot

:35:52.:35:54.

of their grandchild and the very near loss of their daughter. In my

:35:55.:36:00.

view, access to mental health provision must be standardised and

:36:01.:36:04.

good practice copied. 40% of parents of premature babies need sole mental

:36:05.:36:10.

health intervention. For those with babies who die, I would certainly

:36:11.:36:14.

suggest that everyone need `t least an assessment. I also think that

:36:15.:36:17.

relationship counselling should be offered as part of an autom`tic

:36:18.:36:21.

deal, although I do not know what pages this would be benefichal at.

:36:22.:36:27.

At the very least, we need dvidence of the effect of baby loss on

:36:28.:36:33.

relationships. The APPG is lade up of individuals with different

:36:34.:36:38.

expenses and talents, the mdmber for Colchester is excellent on parental

:36:39.:36:43.

leave, the other member knows about pathways of care. My role this year

:36:44.:36:46.

has been instant cremations, not least because of a constitudncy case

:36:47.:36:51.

I had. While I am aware that the minister here is not the Minister

:36:52.:36:56.

responding, is not the minister who should respond on infant crdmation

:36:57.:37:01.

issues, it is important that we have a cross departmental and johned up

:37:02.:37:04.

approach to this so I would welcome his intervention is necessary or at

:37:05.:37:09.

least his speaking to the Mhnistry of Justice about this. I th`nk my

:37:10.:37:13.

giving way, thank you Mr Deputy giving way, thank you Mr Deputy

:37:14.:37:17.

Speaker. I would be horrifidd I listen to this debate, I have never

:37:18.:37:26.

lost a baby my family. I am horrified and I am upset, btt it

:37:27.:37:30.

seems to me that surely, a lother that gives birth, still bordd or

:37:31.:37:37.

not, it is her baby, the falily s baby. Surely -- stillborn or not, it

:37:38.:37:44.

is her baby, the family's b`by. Surely she and the father should

:37:45.:37:47.

have absolute rights with what happens with cremation and

:37:48.:37:50.

thereafter. I absolutely horrified that they do not at the momdnt. I

:37:51.:37:57.

thank my honourable friend for his helpful intervention. We have the

:37:58.:38:00.

APPG welcome the MOT consultation and the subsequent response which

:38:01.:38:05.

was published just before the summer. It seems we are on the cusp

:38:06.:38:08.

of some very important changes in this area. What I would ask is that

:38:09.:38:15.

we push that these happen speedily, they are very important. I `m

:38:16.:38:20.

grateful to my honourable friend for letting me intervene on her in and

:38:21.:38:24.

important speech. I would lhke to inform the House on the back of that

:38:25.:38:28.

comment, that my colleague the Minister at the Ministry of Justice

:38:29.:38:31.

announced last month before mention of a national cremation working

:38:32.:38:37.

group which is working now with all interested parties including looking

:38:38.:38:41.

to take members of this house's evidence, and I encourage all of

:38:42.:38:45.

participate. I thank the Minister participate. I thank the Minister

:38:46.:38:48.

for that and we were thrilldd in the APPG by the formation of th`t group.

:38:49.:38:52.

May I in this context gives the House a few more examples from the

:38:53.:38:57.

are particularly important that are are particularly important that are

:38:58.:38:59.

taken forward speedily. We hope that taken forward speedily. We hope that

:39:00.:39:04.

the MoJ will provide a statttory definition of Ashes to make sure

:39:05.:39:08.

that everything cremated with a baby, including personal itdms and

:39:09.:39:14.

covered, must be recovered. We also help that the MoJ will amend

:39:15.:39:18.

cremation application forms to make explicit the applicant's wishes in

:39:19.:39:25.

relation to the Ashes recovdred And crucially, for many I know this is

:39:26.:39:31.

an important point, bring the cremation of foetuses of less than

:39:32.:39:35.

24 weeks gestation within the scope of the regulation where pardnts wish

:39:36.:39:40.

this to happen. There is sole positive news in a very sensitive

:39:41.:39:44.

area. Moving on to the future of maternity more generally, mx

:39:45.:39:49.

overriding constituency concern at the moment is the future of the

:39:50.:39:54.

Horton General Hospital. If I am honest, it occupies most of my

:39:55.:39:58.

waking moments and my children complained during our summer holiday

:39:59.:40:02.

in August that I cannot forlulate a sentence without the word Horton in

:40:03.:40:08.

it. I fear that is true. Thhs summer, I found that the lid being

:40:09.:40:15.

listed on my own experience is repeatedly, as we have real safety

:40:16.:40:18.

concerns surrounding the downgrading of our obstetric unit at thd Horton

:40:19.:40:21.

General. Since last week, a midwife General. Since last week, a midwife

:40:22.:40:25.

led unit remains at the Horton General but all mothers who may need

:40:26.:40:30.

obstetric care, and that is may need not necessarily will need, that is

:40:31.:40:35.

the majority of mothers, has to go either under their own steal or be

:40:36.:40:39.

transferred as an emergency to the JR in Oxford. In a blue light

:40:40.:40:44.

ambulance, this is a journex between 22 and 27 miles depending on the

:40:45.:40:49.

route. It takes around 45 mhnutes. If travelling on your own c`r, and

:40:50.:40:54.

mothers have their own cars, mothers have their own cars,

:40:55.:40:56.

depending on where you live and the state of the Oxford traffic, it can

:40:57.:41:00.

easily take up to an hour and a half. The decision to downgrade was

:41:01.:41:05.

taken on safety grounds as the trust had failed to recruit enough

:41:06.:41:10.

obstetricians. I must say, H have severe safety concerns for the

:41:11.:41:13.

mothers and babies in our area now. In 2008, a report concluded the

:41:14.:41:20.

distance was too far for our unit to be downgraded. As I see it, nothing

:41:21.:41:23.

has changed except that the Oxford traffic has worsened. I'm kden

:41:24.:41:30.

generally that we start to be kinder to mothers during pregnancy and

:41:31.:41:35.

mean courage in them to labour on mean courage in them to labour on

:41:36.:41:41.

the back of a car on the ro`d. With a personal care actually le`ds to

:41:42.:41:47.

better outcomes. We need to take very careful note of the baroness's

:41:48.:41:51.

I commend Asians in her better birth report. She says that birth --

:41:52.:41:56.

recommendations in her birth report. She said that both should bdcome

:41:57.:42:00.

kinder and more family friendly We must use the impetus of events such

:42:01.:42:04.

as this week to drive through her major recommendations. Chief among

:42:05.:42:10.

these must be the recommend`tion for continuity not of care, but of

:42:11.:42:18.

carer. This has been shown to reduce premature deaths by 24%. Professor

:42:19.:42:30.

Lesley Regan, this first wolan president of the wild card of

:42:31.:42:36.

applications -- president of the Royal College of obstetrici`ns has

:42:37.:42:39.

done a plethora of search which demonstrate that reassurancd and

:42:40.:42:43.

continuity with weekly scans and meetings with the midwife h`s

:42:44.:42:50.

reduced the rate of recurrent miscarriage by 80%, these women have

:42:51.:42:55.

miscarried three or four tiles. The honourable friend mentioned earlier

:42:56.:42:59.

the excellent work being done at Queen Charlotte. In this context I

:43:00.:43:03.

have troubled that the sustainability and transforlation

:43:04.:43:07.

plans made push us towards larger units have left personal care. It

:43:08.:43:11.

maybe I am wrong and I hope I am. Perhaps it is safer for these giant

:43:12.:43:15.

units to deliver the majority of babies. But I worry that in my case

:43:16.:43:22.

in boundary, decisions are being taken in my constituency without

:43:23.:43:26.

their views being considered and without real evidence of thd risks

:43:27.:43:29.

being involved. Everyone in the House is clearly committed to

:43:30.:43:38.

reducing baby loss and therd is clear evidence. We have evidence

:43:39.:43:43.

-based research to show us how to do that and I refer the Ministdr very

:43:44.:43:50.

firmly to the baroness's report Better bereavement care is

:43:51.:43:53.

important, and sadly some b`bies such as mine will always did, but

:43:54.:44:02.

reduce premature death of b`by. I reduce premature death of b`by. I

:44:03.:44:10.

need to be able to tell my constituency is members that they

:44:11.:44:16.

will not suffer as I did. It is a pleasure to follow that excdllent,

:44:17.:44:19.

very moving and yet very pr`ctical speech from the honourable lember

:44:20.:44:26.

who is making me want to crx. I think the idea of having a tissue

:44:27.:44:29.

manufacturer sponsoring this debate was quite a good one. I would also

:44:30.:44:33.

like to pay tribute to the honourable member for industry and

:44:34.:44:37.

the honourable member for Colchester for bringing this really important

:44:38.:44:44.

debate of the House. We are all owing them for raising awardness of

:44:45.:44:51.

this issue, as one of their commitment to the APPG. I would also

:44:52.:44:54.

like to pay tribute to the families who actually started baby loss

:44:55.:45:01.

awareness Day in 2002, and now to the thousands of families across the

:45:02.:45:02.

country who continue the colmitment country who continue the colmitment

:45:03.:45:07.

to helping other family through their grief was highlighting whilst

:45:08.:45:14.

highlighting the lack of colmunity bereavement care. Thousands of

:45:15.:45:19.

families each year in the UK suffer the tragedy of losing a child and

:45:20.:45:25.

hopefully this debate might in some small way leads to them not having

:45:26.:45:32.

are not alone in their grief. This are not alone in their grief. This

:45:33.:45:34.

debate has raised many issuds, many debate has raised many issuds, many

:45:35.:45:38.

of which are uncomfortable but very necessary if we have to change

:45:39.:45:45.

policy to help reduce infant death, help save the rear families from

:45:46.:45:51.

isolation, and to make sure -- bereaved families from isol`tion,

:45:52.:45:54.

and make sure that the best possible neonatal care is

:45:55.:45:58.

and make sure that the best possible neonatal care available to dveryone

:45:59.:46:01.

in the NHS. Before I was eldcted to this place, I worked in the NHS in

:46:02.:46:06.

the Northwest. They perform some good work in this area incltding

:46:07.:46:12.

holding an annual baby memorial day for parents who had lost babies in

:46:13.:46:17.

the hospital, which was led by our excellent hospital chaplains who

:46:18.:46:20.

performed such a good service to bereaved parents. Sadly, I was asked

:46:21.:46:23.

to attend this debate by my constituent Jane Casey whosd

:46:24.:46:29.

daughter tragically died shortly after her birth at the trust. Jane

:46:30.:46:37.

has still not received the root cause analysis into her daughter's

:46:38.:46:40.

Beth from the trust, and IM helping her in obtaining this report 11

:46:41.:46:48.

months after her death. Jamhe says, and these are her words, thd

:46:49.:46:53.

hospital has made me feel that my daughter's life was not important. I

:46:54.:46:58.

am completely broken and find life a struggle. I keep on going bdcause of

:46:59.:47:08.

my son. Such a sad words and so typical of examples that have been

:47:09.:47:13.

shared today. I really am hopeful that this debate could achidve some

:47:14.:47:16.

practical steps to avoid falilies suffering such grief. And hdalth

:47:17.:47:20.

visitors, who have not been mentioned yet, they play such an

:47:21.:47:23.

important role pre-and post-pregnancy and can give support

:47:24.:47:30.

and practical help and yet there role is undervalued. Since 2015

:47:31.:47:35.

health visitors have been ddvolved to local authorities but since then

:47:36.:47:40.

we have seen nearly ?200 million of cuts to local authorities. The

:47:41.:47:44.

former Chancellor of the extractor announced a further ?77 million cut

:47:45.:47:49.

in the next year and ?84 million in the year after. The funding

:47:50.:47:55.

transferred with these health visiting services was not rhng

:47:56.:47:58.

fenced and I sincerely hope that under the guidance of a new Prime

:47:59.:48:02.

Minister and new Chancellor, that they will look at protecting and

:48:03.:48:04.

investing more in this vital service. Staggeringly, 68% of local

:48:05.:48:13.

bereavement support while ndarly a bereavement support while ndarly a

:48:14.:48:17.

fifth of ccs also do not offer such a service. For what seems a vital

:48:18.:48:23.

and necessary provision for families in their time of greatest nded, the

:48:24.:48:26.

failure to do so is clearly apparent in our health care structurds. I am

:48:27.:48:34.

pleased to say that NHS England are currently developing the chhldren

:48:35.:48:36.

palliative care funding currency, which includes pre-brief and care

:48:37.:48:44.

before a baby or child dies, but sadly overlooks bereavement care

:48:45.:48:47.

would hope to see is being lade to would hope to see is being lade to

:48:48.:48:49.

this policy. The government and this has also has

:48:50.:48:58.

the opportunity to make changes by moving the rubble member from

:48:59.:49:01.

Colchester boss might build to have on the statute books parent`l brief

:49:02.:49:07.

believe, this would give thd right entitlement to leave of absdnce for

:49:08.:49:11.

bereaved parents. This is a common right across Europe and I think it

:49:12.:49:15.

is an important first step hn the right direction and I entitlement

:49:16.:49:18.

that should be afforded to `ll at their time of greatest need. Whilst

:49:19.:49:24.

mothers fathers and families will never forget the children they have

:49:25.:49:29.

lost. Baby loss awareness wdek is a chance for those families to meet

:49:30.:49:33.

other families and share melories in remembrance. A collective sharing of

:49:34.:49:38.

experiences can begin to he`l and alleviate a small part of the pain.

:49:39.:49:43.

The most powerful thing it provides is the opportunity to speak out and

:49:44.:49:49.

to prevent others from softdning the same agony happening to othdr

:49:50.:49:53.

parents across the UK. And we as legislators, must seek to act upon

:49:54.:49:58.

the word spoken here in the house, to create a better environmdnt of

:49:59.:50:03.

support for bereaved familids. And finally, can I pay tribute to my

:50:04.:50:09.

honourable friend, the membdr for Lewisham Deptford for sharing the

:50:10.:50:13.

Chadwick story of her daughter Veronica, I'm in awe of the bravery

:50:14.:50:17.

and the courage that she showed in speaking out today. And the bravery

:50:18.:50:20.

and courage has been echoed in the words of the honourable members for

:50:21.:50:24.

North Ayrshire and Arran, W`shington and Sunderland, the honourable

:50:25.:50:28.

member for Banbury and indedd the two honourable members who have

:50:29.:50:30.

brought this debate to the house today and I thank you very luch for

:50:31.:50:34.

giving me my opportunity to speak, thank you. People have got to stand

:50:35.:50:46.

up, Byron Davies. Thank you Madam Deputy Speaker, I'm very gr`teful

:50:47.:50:52.

and it is a great pleasure to participate in this debate today. I

:50:53.:50:56.

want to thank, and congratulate my honourable friends, for Ed hs brief

:50:57.:51:01.

and Colchester for securing and bringing for this incrediblx

:51:02.:51:08.

deportment important debate. And to their work with your Parlialentary

:51:09.:51:13.

party group and other honourable members who have participatdd in it.

:51:14.:51:19.

Can I pay tribute, to the honourable members, for Lewisham and Ddptford

:51:20.:51:25.

and Ayrshire, Aaron and Banbury I have known the honourable mdmber for

:51:26.:51:29.

Ed is brief for quite some time we have been friends, and of course

:51:30.:51:33.

were both members of the National Assembly for Wales. Indeed we used

:51:34.:51:37.

to sit next to each other at the assembly and I witnessed first-hand

:51:38.:51:39.

the terrible loss and devastation that she had when going through her

:51:40.:51:45.

baby loss. It is a testament to her courage and resolve that despite the

:51:46.:51:48.

tragic loss she is highlighting the issue once again, which is `ffecting

:51:49.:51:54.

some of us here today. It t`kes bravery to tackle the silence and

:51:55.:51:59.

Sigma that used to exist, and she was instrumental in tackling this

:52:00.:52:03.

when she was an assembly melber She has also been instrumental hn

:52:04.:52:07.

bringing this issue to the national stage and raising awareness for the

:52:08.:52:10.

tens of thousands of familids who need help and support. In p`ying

:52:11.:52:16.

tribute to the outstanding work she is doing and in the than thd 20 5

:52:17.:52:20.

the Secretary of State launched the national ambition to reduce the

:52:21.:52:26.

rates of stillbirths, neonatal deaths, maternal deaths and brain

:52:27.:52:29.

injuries. That occur during or soon after birth, 15% by 2030 with a

:52:30.:52:39.

shorter name of achieving a 27 cent reduction by 2020, and this no doubt

:52:40.:52:43.

will be in large part to thd excellent work, for the honourable

:52:44.:52:49.

member for Colchester are doing In 2014 there were 3245 stillbhrths,

:52:50.:52:55.

and 2689 infant deaths in England and Wales. The death of a b`by is

:52:56.:53:00.

one of the most traumatic events for a mother and father to go through.

:53:01.:53:05.

And then having to deal with the aftermath of it. The care that their

:53:06.:53:09.

family receive is so vitallx important to try and cope in the

:53:10.:53:13.

long-term with the loss. Th`t is why I am so pleased that this issue is

:53:14.:53:17.

being raised by my honourable friend is because awareness is key to

:53:18.:53:22.

reducing stillbirths and infant mortality but also to tacklhng the

:53:23.:53:26.

stigma surrounding this isste. They can be no greater grief than that of

:53:27.:53:32.

losing a child. It causes psychological conditions th`t last

:53:33.:53:36.

years and even a lifetime. The loss can never truly leave you btt how we

:53:37.:53:39.

care for families and indivhduals can make a huge difference for the

:53:40.:53:43.

future lives of those who h`ve lived with this tragedy. I have bden

:53:44.:53:47.

through it myself, my wife `nd I have a wonderful son, but wd have

:53:48.:53:52.

also lost a child during thd period in the 1980s, where there w`s

:53:53.:53:58.

certainly a stigma on this hssue. You just couldn't talk about it It

:53:59.:54:05.

was to blue. It was almost `n embarrassment to bring it ott in

:54:06.:54:08.

public and we could not discuss the grief and suffering that we felt, or

:54:09.:54:13.

we help to deal with. One of the most traumatic experiences hn our

:54:14.:54:17.

lives. It was a devastating experience and I'm pleased to say

:54:18.:54:23.

that my son who is now 34, his lovely wife Natalie have prdsented

:54:24.:54:27.

us with a grandchild. But h`ving children is one of those marvellous

:54:28.:54:31.

and truly have the experiences for a couple and something that wd

:54:32.:54:34.

cherish. Yet in a moment we can go from one of the happiest life

:54:35.:54:38.

changing experiences to one of the most devastating. You lose ` child,

:54:39.:54:42.

something that you and your loved one would build a life for `nd

:54:43.:54:47.

around, that you look forward to, sports at school, graduation,

:54:48.:54:53.

marriages, in the future, and links to the cherished future, th`t child

:54:54.:54:57.

and happiness is currently taken away. And I member when we

:54:58.:55:00.

experienced this loss, therd was no way to talk about it and all of

:55:01.:55:05.

those feelings had to be bottled up. This never does or never can help

:55:06.:55:11.

with the grieving process. Hndeed, we too were advised, given ledical

:55:12.:55:15.

advice to keep trying. I'm `fraid that was not quite good enotgh at

:55:16.:55:20.

the time. It brings me to the absolutely crucial point, that like

:55:21.:55:24.

with many issues of mental health, that talking about problems, is

:55:25.:55:29.

always a sign of strength, had never one of weakness. It is of course

:55:30.:55:34.

right and vitally important that we have the very best care, cotnselling

:55:35.:55:38.

and services for mothers who have experienced this agonising loss and

:55:39.:55:42.

are treated with kindness, sensitivity and respect in the

:55:43.:55:45.

hospital afterwards. But I `lso think it is crucial that we support

:55:46.:55:48.

fathers who while being strong for the mother and focusing on her knees

:55:49.:55:52.

also has two bear that terrhble loss. We have expense this first

:55:53.:56:00.

hand in my family, there was a great feeling of powerlessness and

:56:01.:56:04.

anguish, when you see a wifd or a mother with no idea of the hssue

:56:05.:56:07.

will the outcome and all yot try to do is start

:56:08.:56:11.

have your own family. You sdem like a bystander with no power to help

:56:12.:56:23.

your loved ones. Therefore we must insure that the NAFTA shall health

:56:24.:56:27.

service, provide counselling, with statutory leave to provide the best

:56:28.:56:35.

support. With this in mind, I fully and wholeheartedly support ly

:56:36.:56:38.

honourable friends for Colchester and my honourable friend, and his

:56:39.:56:43.

parental bereavement leave, which is fundamental to guarantee th`t

:56:44.:56:47.

parents have some time to try to grieve for their loss and I'm sure

:56:48.:56:51.

that for this chance to be given in these to be on a statutory footing.

:56:52.:56:55.

Finally, I want to say that I'm pleased that the apartment of health

:56:56.:57:00.

has conducted a survey, for the bereavement in England to btild up

:57:01.:57:04.

the provision of current provision and identify whether gaps are. It is

:57:05.:57:08.

also crucial in hearing somd good practice, and understanding the

:57:09.:57:14.

challenges, that the governlent is increasing the number of midwives.

:57:15.:57:17.

It is hoped that this will lead to an increase in the number of

:57:18.:57:21.

midwives, who has specialist training. This should be a lesson to

:57:22.:57:26.

all of our devolved governmdnts As we have found, fewer than h`lf of

:57:27.:57:33.

doctors and midwives have found out, it is vital that staff are trained,

:57:34.:57:38.

for the psychological and physical needs of families and to cotnsel

:57:39.:57:42.

them when needed. I hope th`t the government committing going even

:57:43.:57:46.

further than improving mand`tory training, and supporting thd need

:57:47.:57:50.

for statutory lead, for the loss of the most cherished things in our

:57:51.:58:03.

lives, the child. Anna Soubry. Thank you very much indeed man Deputy

:58:04.:58:06.

Speaker, it is or was with care that one treads into an area of life but

:58:07.:58:11.

like many honourable members, Ira member in the 21 or 22 week area of

:58:12.:58:18.

the pregnancy when the marvdllous magical moment of what the books

:58:19.:58:23.

described as a fluttering, `nd you suddenly realise that if yot have

:58:24.:58:27.

experienced it, the actual nightmare of morning sickness, the other

:58:28.:58:31.

afflictions as they are oftdn are, of pregnancy, actually is all about

:58:32.:58:36.

this new life that is there within you. And I suspect, not alone

:58:37.:58:45.

amongst, many honourable melbers of both sexes, that moment when you

:58:46.:58:50.

look into the Moses basket `nd next time you look into it, that bundle

:58:51.:58:55.

of life that you bear, will be in it. And of course, you are dxtremely

:58:56.:59:00.

excited about that, and also the truth is, you are ready rather

:59:01.:59:04.

frightened of this. When it is your first child and you have never had a

:59:05.:59:11.

baby before. And so, I find it absolutely unimaginable, to have

:59:12.:59:17.

experienced as so many in the place has spoken with great courage, what

:59:18.:59:22.

it must be like never to have that Moses basket filled with jox and the

:59:23.:59:26.

child that you have born for well over nine months. I want to warmly

:59:27.:59:34.

congratulate, both my honourable friends, for edits Breanne

:59:35.:59:36.

Colchester not only for sectring this debate but for the gre`t work

:59:37.:59:40.

that they have done. And nobody could have been unaffected `nd not

:59:41.:59:50.

moved, by the incredibly sad story of the honourable lady who

:59:51.:59:54.

represents Lewisham Deptford. And the honourable lady who represents

:59:55.:59:59.

North Ayrshire and Arran. If I may say with no lessening of thd

:00:00.:00:02.

terrible story that we have heard from the honourable lady from North

:00:03.:00:07.

Ayrshire, I think we were all particularly struck by the story of

:00:08.:00:11.

the honourable lady, the experience that she had from Lewisham `nd

:00:12.:00:15.

Deptford, not just with gre`t sorrow. Actually with I had to say,

:00:16.:00:20.

I felt a rise of anger withhn me because I thought it was outrageous

:00:21.:00:23.

what had happened to the honourable lady. I want to be really m`de

:00:24.:00:29.

secure that what happened to her, will never happen again, to anybody,

:00:30.:00:37.

in our society. Obviously I extend that to everybody who was brought to

:00:38.:00:41.

this place by way of their own experiences or their constituents

:00:42.:00:45.

experiences, that we learned the lessons of all of this. We do

:00:46.:00:50.

everything we can, to make sure that firstly babies don't die in the

:00:51.:00:53.

first place and so we don't have the high rates of stillbirth th`t we

:00:54.:00:57.

have heard about, or those that then die in those early months of their

:00:58.:01:03.

life, but it is the treatment, of people, of both parents, th`t must

:01:04.:01:09.

be changed. I want to hold ` spark of hope in my life that what

:01:10.:01:13.

happened to the honourable lember for Lewisham and Deptford, H would

:01:14.:01:20.

like to think it was a one. I like to think that over the pass`ge of

:01:21.:01:25.

time perhaps we could be more confident that it is extremdly rare.

:01:26.:01:29.

That nobody ever suffers wh`t she did, and of course nobody stffers

:01:30.:01:35.

what the honourable Lady suffers as well. I want to make a short

:01:36.:01:42.

contribution. It is really ` bad bereavement suites. It is b`sed

:01:43.:01:46.

entirely on the experience of two of my constituents. One couple have

:01:47.:01:57.

come friends of mine, anybody you heard of their story, there was much

:01:58.:02:01.

sympathy, and real concern, to discover that when their baby Emily

:02:02.:02:06.

was born, at a stillborn birth, where I had both my daughters, I

:02:07.:02:11.

found it quite astonishing `nd dine every body else did that he`rd of

:02:12.:02:16.

their story, back in 2013. That there was no Barizan and swdet. So

:02:17.:02:21.

those honourable members who have talked about this terrible tragedy,

:02:22.:02:26.

there is no greater tragedy than a loss of a child, and there `re no

:02:27.:02:31.

degrees of grief. But to lose a baby in the circumstances, where we are

:02:32.:02:36.

all becoming more aware of. I can't genuinely imagine any greatdr

:02:37.:02:42.

tragedy and loss. And then to have that, it is almost cruel. While the

:02:43.:02:47.

rest of us are celebrating `s we have heard, with balloons and

:02:48.:02:48.

relatives. You with your terrible grief, to

:02:49.:02:59.

have to sit with your loved one whilst all this jollity is going on,

:03:00.:03:03.

because there is no place where you can go and grief. And have xour

:03:04.:03:07.

private last moments with your baby. Before they are properly buried All

:03:08.:03:13.

of these things are done properly. I think that is just appalling. I was

:03:14.:03:17.

horrified to learn from the honourable member who represents

:03:18.:03:27.

Eddsbury, it is still 25% of hospital streets who do not have the

:03:28.:03:33.

bereavement suite. I think when a terrible tragedy happens, whatever

:03:34.:03:37.

that tragedy might become htman beings wants to come togethdr to

:03:38.:03:40.

make good of something that has been wholly horrible. I do not h`ve any

:03:41.:03:47.

difficulty in those circumstances with parents working hand-in-hand

:03:48.:03:50.

with the hospital trust where they do not have a bereavement stite to

:03:51.:03:57.

create such a sweet. The Nottingham University Hospital trust dhd much

:03:58.:04:00.

to make sure that when Rich`rd Michelle Daniels decided th`t they

:04:01.:04:12.

would raise money to do such a sweet, it was a relatively dasy

:04:13.:04:18.

journey. It was a plan to r`ise ?25,000, but within 18 months they

:04:19.:04:23.

raised hundred ?50,000. Thex did it through a variety of fundrahsing

:04:24.:04:28.

methods and after Emily died in 2013, it was with real joy `nd

:04:29.:04:31.

pleasure that they finally opened the serenity suite at the Qteens

:04:32.:04:38.

medical Centre in Nottinghal last year. Sorry, this year in April

:04:39.:04:45.

Such has been their dedicathon to the charity that they founddd, they

:04:46.:04:53.

have been contacted by parents from other parts of the East Midlands

:04:54.:04:57.

Domino to be from Derby, whdre there is no such bereavement suitd. They

:04:58.:05:03.

are now resurrecting the ch`rity and they are embarking on a hugd

:05:04.:05:06.

bereavement suite. I urge them to bereavement suite. I urge them to

:05:07.:05:11.

continue to do that. It is right that parents should be involved in

:05:12.:05:15.

it. But it might equally be right that all those hospital trusts that

:05:16.:05:19.

do not have the treatment stites now absolutely get on with it. They

:05:20.:05:22.

should not have to rely on ` parent who has suffered this terrible loss

:05:23.:05:29.

to spark them into taking action to make sure that these bereavdment

:05:30.:05:32.

seats exist and that they are fully equipped and the staff are fully

:05:33.:05:37.

trained. So my absolute congratulations to all thosd who

:05:38.:05:41.

have spoken and particularlx to those who have laid bare thd worst

:05:42.:05:45.

moments of their lives to ptt them forward so that we can ensure that

:05:46.:05:49.

when we say to the government, and I know that the Minister will be

:05:50.:05:53.

listening to all of this, that this really is an area from all of the

:05:54.:05:57.

things that have been descrhbed and all the way that have been

:05:58.:06:00.

described, this is not just about bereavement suite. It is now really

:06:01.:06:04.

the time for action so that we can be proud as a nation that wd have

:06:05.:06:08.

reduced the number of babies who are born dead or who die within the

:06:09.:06:12.

first months of their infancy, and we do the right thing by thdir

:06:13.:06:15.

parents and by all of them, and we look forward to the future that has

:06:16.:06:18.

been denied for them and thdir child. Thank you. Can I pay tribute

:06:19.:06:28.

to the honourable members for Eddsbury and Colchester. My

:06:29.:06:36.

neighbour made a courageous and gracious speech today, and the

:06:37.:06:39.

honourable member for Colchdster made a powerful and practic`l

:06:40.:06:44.

speech. The number of colle`gues in this house who have shared their

:06:45.:06:49.

personal experiences I think have shown how many people across the

:06:50.:06:53.

country have been affected by this issue. And therefore what potential

:06:54.:06:57.

there is to make a real difference there is to make a real difference

:06:58.:07:01.

in so many people's lives in Newport this issue. -- bringing forward this

:07:02.:07:11.

issue. Can I add my tributes to those of other members of the

:07:12.:07:16.

chamber to the contributions from the other honourable members who

:07:17.:07:24.

have spoken today, they werd truly moving. In fact, I have nevdr in

:07:25.:07:29.

over six years of sitting in this chamber seen so many members so

:07:30.:07:40.

visibly moved. I also want to pay tribute to the many midwives,

:07:41.:07:41.

consultants and other members of consultants and other members of

:07:42.:07:47.

staff in the NHS who did provide good bereavement care to victims of

:07:48.:07:54.

at the most difficult time of their at the most difficult time of their

:07:55.:07:57.

lives means that high-quality epiphytic care is critical. Thanks

:07:58.:08:06.

needs to go to those who work at times so dedicated and with such

:08:07.:08:11.

commitment in this arena. I want to start with a story from my

:08:12.:08:17.

constituent which shows the NHS does in part provide extremely good care

:08:18.:08:22.

but also requires more rigotr. I received a letter from my

:08:23.:08:27.

constituent whose daughter was lost as a baby at 20 weeks. She'd had

:08:28.:08:33.

excellent care from the grand logical consultant and the hospital

:08:34.:08:37.

staff who treated the loss very sensitively. But there were failures

:08:38.:08:39.

in her care. She writes, in her care. She writes,

:08:40.:08:45.

unfortunately, the symptoms leading to the loss of a baby occurred at a

:08:46.:08:51.

weekend. Protocols about sending her straight to the phonological

:08:52.:08:55.

department were not followed. There was a chance the pregnancy light

:08:56.:08:59.

have been saved. Nor were other protocols that so for instant her

:09:00.:09:06.

midwife would have been informed, and rang up later asking whx

:09:07.:09:12.

antenatal appointments were not kept. It geared to get my d`ughter

:09:13.:09:18.

the specialist counselling she needed, and she did not know that

:09:19.:09:19.

she was entitled to maternity leave. she was entitled to maternity leave.

:09:20.:09:24.

It shows that there was a l`ck of joined up communication between the

:09:25.:09:30.

front clinicians, potentially to assist her daughter. I understand

:09:31.:09:36.

hospitals in that area are hmproving the training of staff and stpport

:09:37.:09:41.

for bereaved parents but thhs was in a large city. And in this d`y and

:09:42.:09:45.

age, this should have been better. I do also wants to contribute to this

:09:46.:09:51.

young lady as well, because she is now setting up a new branch of

:09:52.:09:57.

sounds in her area and it h`s been wonderful to hear today how many

:09:58.:10:03.

people from their personal dxpenses, and during the course of assisting

:10:04.:10:09.

others, have put their energies into such organisations. Stillbirth is

:10:10.:10:20.

still almost, but thanks to this debate it will be decreasingly so, a

:10:21.:10:25.

whole family of my constitudnts whole family of my constitudnts

:10:26.:10:29.

says. And wider social and work contact groups. Mothers loshng babys

:10:30.:10:35.

suffer grief, guilt and horlonal suffer grief, guilt and horlonal

:10:36.:10:40.

effects while still trying to hold down jobs. As the mother of the

:10:41.:10:45.

daughter who lost a child, this person says, I found this thme

:10:46.:10:51.

emotionally very hard. Surely, she says, with more openness and

:10:52.:10:56.

appropriate training, our country's shameful record of stillbirths

:10:57.:10:58.

be improved. Mental health of be improved. Mental health of

:10:59.:11:06.

mothers would be improved in meaning that it would be less presstre on

:11:07.:11:13.

the health service. My daughter had a diagnosable infection, if this had

:11:14.:11:17.

been screened on, there would be less babies lost, and this debate

:11:18.:11:21.

called for better screening. Can I also as an adjunct to the mdmber for

:11:22.:11:28.

Colchester, he called for more advice during pregnancy on smoking

:11:29.:11:31.

and be city, -- of the city. advice during pregnancy on smoking

:11:32.:11:43.

and be city, -- of the -- obesity, can I ask that alcohol is added to

:11:44.:11:52.

that. The best advice is th`t alcohol should not be drunk at all

:11:53.:11:56.

Joan pregnancy. Because different mothers react to it very

:11:57.:12:02.

differently. There has been inadequate publicity over that

:12:03.:12:11.

regulation which I welcome because there has been decades of confusing

:12:12.:12:17.

advice ever that topic. One or two other points I would like to refer

:12:18.:12:20.

to, which have been mentiondd already that I would like to add to

:12:21.:12:25.

add my support. And then a final issue I would like to mention which

:12:26.:12:29.

is still to do which we havd to briefly address. Today a qu`rter of

:12:30.:12:37.

a million miscarriages occur every year and it is not only the women

:12:38.:12:42.

who feel the loss but also fathers, grandparent and the wider f`mily who

:12:43.:12:48.

grieve. They need help as wdll. Now, statistics cannot compare whth the

:12:49.:12:54.

power of personal experiencd such as those we have heard today. But to

:12:55.:12:58.

frame some of the goblins encountered by women who miscarry,

:12:59.:13:05.

-- the problems encountered, I have been aware of the survey of 300

:13:06.:13:08.

women carried out by the miscarriage Association who found that 45% of

:13:09.:13:12.

the women date survey did not feel well informed about what was

:13:13.:13:17.

happening to them physicallx. Only 29% felt well care for emothonally.

:13:18.:13:23.

And nearly four out of five received no after-care at all. They noted

:13:24.:13:30.

that access to information `nd emotional support has been shown

:13:31.:13:35.

time and time again to help people cope with the experience of loss but

:13:36.:13:40.

this needs to be made avail`ble later if needed. They also noted

:13:41.:13:44.

that sometimes it was not always important what was said to reading

:13:45.:13:49.

women, but it was just enough that someone was listening that was

:13:50.:13:53.

and hearing so many individtal and hearing so many individtal

:13:54.:13:56.

experiences, I hope that we in the experiences, I hope that we in the

:13:57.:14:00.

House will show to the nation that we are listening and we card.

:14:01.:14:05.

Speaking out about the issud which is also being raised, which is how

:14:06.:14:09.

an unborn child is treated before an unborn child is treated before

:14:10.:14:14.

the 24 week stage, as we have hurt when a woman has had a misc`rriage,

:14:15.:14:18.

she can be at an extremely vulnerable state. As my constituent

:14:19.:14:27.

said, women may well offer not be in hospital, in fact only 18% of

:14:28.:14:32.

miscarriages occur in hospital. The hospital is going to ring up the

:14:33.:14:38.

hospital -- the mother is going to ring up the hospital with advice

:14:39.:14:42.

what to do, particularly on what to do with their miscarried chhld. I'm

:14:43.:14:49.

extremely concerned to hear that someone from trust set up to

:14:50.:14:56.

experience baby loss has told Mike office recently that she sthll

:14:57.:15:00.

who have been given the advhce to who have been given the advhce to

:15:01.:15:06.

put the miscarried foetuses in a jar put the miscarried foetuses in a jar

:15:07.:15:13.

in the fridge. This is extrdmely distressing and traumatising for

:15:14.:15:17.

families. Some women have h`d to buy a new fridge after such events

:15:18.:15:21.

because it has upset them so much. Hospital mortuary 's need to be

:15:22.:15:26.

available for the foetus of the unborn child to be properly taken to

:15:27.:15:32.

and stored. At the advice of parents, and the staff taking such

:15:33.:15:33.

calls me to have training across the calls me to have training across the

:15:34.:15:41.

board to be away with this. -- aware of this. More trees need to be open

:15:42.:15:45.

seven days a week and it is important that the directivd is

:15:46.:15:50.

coming from government and ht is not left to trusts to come up whth their

:15:51.:15:55.

own systems as it is clearlx unsatisfactory. I know the hssue has

:15:56.:16:01.

been raised about stillbirths and people having to be in wards with

:16:02.:16:07.

celebrating families, but there is also the issue of women who have

:16:08.:16:10.

suffered miscarriage and often the early care pregnancy is in one unit

:16:11.:16:19.

and certainly, when... When I had a miscarriage at 16 weeks, I had to

:16:20.:16:25.

sit next to women who had scanned photographs. It was very, vdry

:16:26.:16:31.

difficult. And it is somethhng that has to be considered more sdriously

:16:32.:16:38.

by medical staff. She makes an extremely good point. It is

:16:39.:16:44.

absolutely vital that we support women in appropriate circumstances

:16:45.:16:48.

members have mentioned. Womdn who members have mentioned. Womdn who

:16:49.:16:50.

have lost their babies but need to have lost their babies but need to

:16:51.:16:55.

go through labour, the issud of a separate award should be a priority.

:16:56.:17:02.

They may be in labour for sdveral days, and to hear other womdn around

:17:03.:17:06.

with their babies must be so distressing. Hospitals need to

:17:07.:17:12.

create better spaces for wolen at all stages in their pregnancies I

:17:13.:17:17.

permission, some of my own permission, some of my own

:17:18.:17:24.

experience on that note, I was as I told the House earlier, in hospital

:17:25.:17:27.

for some considerable time because I had been very ill. After I was in

:17:28.:17:33.

ward, postnatal ward with pdople ward, postnatal ward with pdople

:17:34.:17:36.

with babies. I was in a sep`rate room but I had to share the bathroom

:17:37.:17:38.

and the midwives and all thd staff and the midwives and all thd staff

:17:39.:17:43.

with mothers with live babids. And I found it terribly difficult when

:17:44.:17:50.

people came in, nice people bringing you cups of tea and food, bringing

:17:51.:17:54.

you all sorts of things that have not been told and people repeatedly

:17:55.:17:58.

asked me where the baby was. Which was so distressing. My heart goes

:17:59.:18:06.

out to the honourable member. How unnecessary, added grief is being

:18:07.:18:07.

compounded in such situations. Families have lost babies speaking

:18:08.:18:18.

about the knowledge and for their child's life. And unfortunately

:18:19.:18:24.

this is an area where the l`w adds to the distressed to. Because under

:18:25.:18:31.

current UK law, babies are effectively considered a person at

:18:32.:18:36.

24 weeks, this means that often that acknowledgement is not therd as it

:18:37.:18:40.

could be. I have even heard of parents lying about the gestation

:18:41.:18:44.

period in order to try and obtain a birth certificate, and I do add my

:18:45.:18:49.

appeal to that of other honourable members, to ask ministers to look

:18:50.:18:54.

again particularly at the f`ct that obviously now, as modern technology

:18:55.:18:58.

has improved, unborn babies are increasingly viable, the law should

:18:59.:19:08.

move not only with technology, and I would ask ministers to look at this

:19:09.:19:13.

too. This one last point I would like to mention, it is very

:19:14.:19:21.

sensitive. There is this to boo I mentioned earlier, as one colleague

:19:22.:19:24.

also said earlier in this ddbate, if there is one thing that we can do in

:19:25.:19:30.

this house, it is to break taboos. And this is the fact that p`rents

:19:31.:19:34.

can also suffer a deep sensd of loss and bereavement. When their long

:19:35.:19:40.

fall child is not lost during pregnancy, during a miscarrhage but

:19:41.:19:47.

due to a disability being dhagnosed while their child is in the room

:19:48.:19:56.

leading them to have a heartbreaking condition for a termination

:19:57.:20:01.

sometimes in pregnancy. There is little if any brief in support or

:20:02.:20:04.

adequate counselling before they make that decision or somethme after

:20:05.:20:11.

for such parents. Yet they too have lost a much loved child. In 201 ,

:20:12.:20:17.

the pro-life all-party group conducted a detailed year-long

:20:18.:20:27.

Inquiry, into it. We were rdpeatedly told by witnesses about the lack of

:20:28.:20:32.

proper counselling and bere`ved and care for such parents, should they

:20:33.:20:38.

want it. Which many do. We were also told of some very good examples and

:20:39.:20:44.

practice, one parent talked about they had a funeral service that

:20:45.:20:47.

helped enormously. Another told of how, they were able to bathd their

:20:48.:20:56.

child before the child was then appropriately cared for following

:20:57.:21:02.

the termination. But other witnesses were amazed, that this kind of care

:21:03.:21:08.

was available because they had had none at all. One of our key

:21:09.:21:12.

recommendations in our report was that appropriate breed Mintdrn

:21:13.:21:16.

support and counselling shotld be available for all parents who wanted

:21:17.:21:21.

it in such situations, even if it is sometime later. I regret to say and

:21:22.:21:27.

I'm following slightly in the footsteps of the honourable member

:21:28.:21:30.

for Mid Sussex, who spoke e`rlier about the uphill struggle. Have had

:21:31.:21:35.

an uphill struggle in trying to gain the attention of the Departlent of

:21:36.:21:40.

Health about this issue. And I do thank the honourable members who

:21:41.:21:44.

have raised their losses, in this debate, because I hope now that the

:21:45.:21:48.

Department of Health will consider this, that report was issued in

:21:49.:21:56.

2013. After an adjournment debate, which was led by the honour`ble

:21:57.:22:00.

members for Colchester and headers be which I have referred to. I was

:22:01.:22:07.

deeply moved, I spoke to thd then Minister, that I would send this

:22:08.:22:11.

report to the Department of Health after that debate which I dhd.

:22:12.:22:17.

Unfortunately I received no reply. I sent a reminder sometime later, I

:22:18.:22:22.

received no reply after that at all. I do hope that as a result of

:22:23.:22:26.

today's debate, the Departmdnt of Health will take Cirrus leave this

:22:27.:22:30.

additional point, that parents in this situation too, have thd same

:22:31.:22:34.

kind of care and support as others who have been spoken about hn this

:22:35.:22:44.

debate today. Can I first apologise because I had hoped to be there at

:22:45.:22:47.

the beginning of the debate but we had a 3.5 hour meeting, due to poor

:22:48.:22:57.

chairmanship it dragged on, the chairman was me. I want to picture

:22:58.:23:02.

but to the hard work of the members for edits Briand Colchester, I was

:23:03.:23:06.

lucky to have caught the spdech another very emotional speech. One

:23:07.:23:12.

of many emotional speeches, in an extraordinary well-informed debate,

:23:13.:23:17.

that we have had this afternoon showing the house I think at its

:23:18.:23:23.

best. But also showing some quite extraordinary systemic insensitivity

:23:24.:23:27.

is within the health system. That can only make a tragic outcome even

:23:28.:23:33.

worse for those parents expdriencing the grief of baby lot. And surely,

:23:34.:23:44.

and we must do so much bettdr. This is a big and a partly hidden

:23:45.:23:52.

problem. The rates of pre-and postnatal mortality in this country,

:23:53.:23:58.

are appalling and shameful. We rank forestalled births 33 out of 35

:23:59.:24:04.

developed nations in the world. One in every 200 babies dies as a result

:24:05.:24:15.

of stillbirth in the UK. 15 times the rate of mortality for cot

:24:16.:24:20.

deaths, an area where we have made huge progress, but also worrying if

:24:21.:24:24.

one looks at the statistics and we have had many statistics so I won't

:24:25.:24:30.

quote more. There is a 25% variance between mortality rates in different

:24:31.:24:34.

parts of the country and th`t is a cause for great concern in htself.

:24:35.:24:37.

We need to do better as a n`tion but certainly we need to be doing much

:24:38.:24:41.

better for certain parts of the country that do not deserve to be

:24:42.:24:46.

lagging behind so far in thd progress that has been made in other

:24:47.:24:49.

parts of the country. It is down to a whole host of reasons that we have

:24:50.:24:54.

heard here, there is poor monitoring, patchy monitoring during

:24:55.:25:00.

pregnancy. There are in parts of the country shortages of midwivds.

:25:01.:25:04.

Specialist midwives. At the end of the day, 4.9 out of every thousand

:25:05.:25:10.

live births, are stillborn. And that figure must come down because it

:25:11.:25:15.

stayed stubbornly high for too many years. So I welcomed the plddge from

:25:16.:25:19.

the Secretary of State for Health earlier in this year in March. When

:25:20.:25:24.

he pledged, that we would sdek to halve the number of maternal and

:25:25.:25:28.

baby deaths by 2013, which hf successful would save some 0500 more

:25:29.:25:33.

lives every year. I welcome the progress that has been made in

:25:34.:25:38.

giving out information, it has been produced to give to all expdctant

:25:39.:25:43.

mothers by week 24. That is too late and for reasons that I will come

:25:44.:25:51.

onto, we need to do better. I pay tribute to the work that has been

:25:52.:25:55.

done on smoking, it is a catse of serious AAB loss. It is attributed

:25:56.:26:05.

to 2200 preterm births, 5000 miscarriages and 300 perinatal

:26:06.:26:11.

deaths. By a self induced poison of smoking and smoking excessively in

:26:12.:26:15.

too many cases during pregn`ncy There has been progress, on the full

:26:16.:26:23.

alcohol Spectrum disorder and the all-party group, produced a report

:26:24.:26:28.

on this recently, we have bden visiting hospitals with the charity

:26:29.:26:32.

that promotes this subject. To give clearer and better advice and

:26:33.:26:37.

high-profile advice to women about what is acceptable and potentially

:26:38.:26:42.

harmful, about these alcohol during pregnancy as well. Progress has been

:26:43.:26:45.

made but a lot more needs to be made. I contrast the lack of

:26:46.:26:51.

progress, on baby loss, with the great progress that has been made on

:26:52.:26:58.

deaths through cot deaths, very high profile campaign, some decades ago

:26:59.:27:03.

now, and that heady huge and very quick effect, now the brief we have

:27:04.:27:11.

had together for short lives. Mentions the appalling figures on

:27:12.:27:16.

Griezmann support and we have heard that, 17% of CCG 's do not

:27:17.:27:21.

commission support, 68% of local authorities do not commission

:27:22.:27:26.

bereavement support, it doesn't just happen in medical environments but

:27:27.:27:28.

home when you're coming into contact with other council services. It just

:27:29.:27:34.

doesn't happen in two thirds of local authorities. But therd is also

:27:35.:27:40.

the psychological bereavement support in the neonatal services or

:27:41.:27:44.

rather the lack of it, and, the bliss figures show that 41% of

:27:45.:27:48.

neonatal unit say that parents have no access to a trained ment`l health

:27:49.:27:53.

worker, 30% of neonatal units say that parents have no access to any

:27:54.:27:57.

psychological support at all. And one third of them that look after

:27:58.:28:00.

the smallest and sickest baby say that their parents have no `ccess to

:28:01.:28:05.

a trade paid mental health worker. This is not just about a bit of tea

:28:06.:28:10.

and sympathy, from harm trahned bereavement support, this is about

:28:11.:28:15.

ongoing trauma. We have heard from the honourable member from

:28:16.:28:17.

Colchester for whom this tr`gedy happened many years ago, th`t is

:28:18.:28:22.

still there. This is not solething that leaves you, that you grow out

:28:23.:28:26.

of when you leave the hospital or when you have fortunately a healthy

:28:27.:28:32.

baby, that this disappears. It doesn't, people deal with it in

:28:33.:28:37.

different ways, and different successes or not. Those counselling

:28:38.:28:43.

services need to be available. The figures for perinatal mental illness

:28:44.:28:46.

are appalling in this country. One in six women will suffer from some

:28:47.:28:51.

form of mental illness, those are the women who are fortunate enough,

:28:52.:28:57.

to go through a healthy babx birth, and we all know the impact that will

:28:58.:29:02.

have on attachment dysfuncthon with that child, and all of the problems

:29:03.:29:06.

that child growing up withott a proper good-quality attachmdnt with

:29:07.:29:11.

his or her primary carer. And we know the cost of not getting that

:29:12.:29:20.

right, as the report, has s`id. It is ?23 billion in each and dvery

:29:21.:29:24.

year. It is a hugely full shck on the wine and she let alone socially

:29:25.:29:29.

not to be doing more about this at those very early stages. Thdre are

:29:30.:29:33.

many charities and we have heard some good examples of charities that

:29:34.:29:37.

step in and help on this front. Particularly with that after

:29:38.:29:44.

support. As my honourable friend mentioned earlier, this isn't just

:29:45.:29:50.

up to the NHS, there is a vdry good charity that has approached me, that

:29:51.:29:55.

provides free comfort, to bdreaved parents to support the ment`l health

:29:56.:29:59.

and healing after the loss of a baby during pregnancy. But,

:30:00.:30:05.

significantly, the bears th`t they give out is a gift from another

:30:06.:30:08.

family that has experience the loss of the baby, so the parents know

:30:09.:30:12.

that they are not alone. And each bear has a label attached whth the

:30:13.:30:16.

information about the charity and signpost to other charities, and all

:30:17.:30:20.

that is relevant to them. Thank goodness there are charities doing

:30:21.:30:24.

work like this, but frankly it shouldn't be down to them to be

:30:25.:30:29.

relied upon, to produce somd pretty basic essential health and social

:30:30.:30:36.

welfare care, to mums and d`ds, add the relevant point in their lives. I

:30:37.:30:41.

just want to Major, on and H thought I would be upstaged by my honourable

:30:42.:30:46.

friend, the member for Conn`ughton, by resurrecting my private lembers

:30:47.:30:52.

bill, the registration of stillbirths bill, which I l`unched

:30:53.:30:57.

in his house on the 14th of January 2014 with cross-party support. I

:30:58.:31:05.

just want to reheat some of its contents, it hasn't come to law

:31:06.:31:08.

surprise surprise but I think it is just as essential and it shows why,

:31:09.:31:12.

this is something that we could do without the advances of medhcal

:31:13.:31:17.

science, without huge cost but could have a huge impact on giving some

:31:18.:31:22.

comfort and closure, to the many thousands of our constituents that

:31:23.:31:26.

go through some of the can sit things that we have heard too today.

:31:27.:31:30.

So I brought in a private mdmbers bill which would have amenddd the

:31:31.:31:35.

births and deaths registrathon act 1953 to provide the parents, to

:31:36.:31:38.

register the death of a child still born before the threshold of 24

:31:39.:31:43.

weeks of gestation. Arbitrary, 4 weeks. If you happen to havd given

:31:44.:31:51.

birth to a stillborn trialldd after 23 weeks, six days, and 23 hours,

:31:52.:31:56.

that child never existed in the eyes of the state. That child is to all

:31:57.:32:01.

intents and purposes a misc`rriage. If that child had clung on for an

:32:02.:32:05.

other couple of hours of behng stillborn and gone beyond that 4

:32:06.:32:11.

week threshold, it would be a child in the eyes of the state. That is an

:32:12.:32:16.

extraordinary anomaly in thd law that we need to address. So some

:32:17.:32:23.

experience as we have heard, lost through miscarriage, some ghve birth

:32:24.:32:26.

routinely but express the p`in of losing a child within days, weeks or

:32:27.:32:30.

months and Sunday through all of the trials and tribulations of

:32:31.:32:34.

pregnancy, only to give birth to a stillborn child. That is thd target,

:32:35.:32:41.

of my bill, to help those p`rents. We have heard of the problels, we

:32:42.:32:46.

still have. But I think the situation is made worse for those

:32:47.:32:50.

parents that have stillborn children for 24 weeks.

:32:51.:32:57.

Because of that arbitrary fhgure. Because of it, there are no central

:32:58.:33:02.

records on exactly how many figures are born in that way so thex do not

:33:03.:33:07.

form part of the mortality figures. So the position we have been talking

:33:08.:33:11.

about in stillbirth is even worse than we appreciate because of those

:33:12.:33:15.

born before 24 weeks. Withott wishing in any way to downplay the

:33:16.:33:19.

importance and pain of a miscarriage, particularly for new

:33:20.:33:23.

parents struggling to have their first child, those experiences are

:33:24.:33:27.

different. That was brought home to me most starkly by the storx of a

:33:28.:33:31.

constituent of mine Hayley who came to see me back in 2013, campaigning

:33:32.:33:36.

for the change is a law that I then took up. Hayley was pregnant and for

:33:37.:33:40.

nearly 20 weeks, she carried a child nearly 20 weeks, she carried a child

:33:41.:33:47.

of her and her partner. She felt the baby kicking, she went to all the

:33:48.:33:51.

other ups and downs of a first-time pregnancy. Sadly after 19 wdeks

:33:52.:33:54.

something went wrong and thd baby died unborn. It was not a

:33:55.:33:59.

miscarriage, and the followhng week Hayley had to go through thd pain of

:34:00.:34:03.

giving birth to a baby that she knew was no longer alive. She had to take

:34:04.:34:08.

powerful drugs to induce a pregnancy, she explains

:34:09.:34:13.

contractions, she went into Worthing Hospital and had pain relief,

:34:14.:34:21.

Worthing Hospital is the safest maternity unit in the country and we

:34:22.:34:25.

are very proud of it. Many thousands of my constituents marched to save

:34:26.:34:34.

it in 2008 as the PCT idiothcally did not think we needed it. Despite

:34:35.:34:40.

having the oldest population of the country if not the universe in

:34:41.:34:44.

start of life facilities in Worthing start of life facilities in

:34:45.:34:45.

and we aren't thankful for that -- and we aren't thankful for that --

:34:46.:34:52.

we are grateful for that. The following day Hayley gave bhrth to

:34:53.:34:57.

her baby, Samuel, she gave him a name, she held sandal in her arms

:34:58.:34:58.

and she and her partner took and she and her partner took

:34:59.:35:03.

photographs, had his hand and foot prints taken and said their

:35:04.:35:09.

goodbyes. Fortunately she w`s given good supplier by the clinic`l staff

:35:10.:35:12.

and they had good bereavements guidance. She had an understanding

:35:13.:35:19.

employer and she found a sylpathetic funeral director and a funeral took

:35:20.:35:22.

place two weeks later. To all intents and purposes, Haylex with

:35:23.:35:26.

her partner went to all the expenses of policy and the pain of childbirth

:35:27.:35:29.

enjoyed by any other mother. But they were coupled in this c`se with

:35:30.:35:33.

the unimaginable grief of a parent who has just lost a child bdfore

:35:34.:35:37.

they could ever get to know him She did not just go through stillbirth,

:35:38.:35:41.

she had a still baby. She bdcame a mum. The crucial difference is that

:35:42.:35:47.

Hayley and Fraser's baby is not recognised in the eyes of the state.

:35:48.:35:51.

Because she was born before 24 weeks gestation. As I say, if she had been

:35:52.:35:57.

born, if he had been born after 24 weeks and one day come he would have

:35:58.:36:01.

been recognised and the death properly registered as a sthllbirth

:36:02.:36:09.

forming the statistics. It would have been an acknowledgement of an

:36:10.:36:13.

actual individual life, and to add further insult to injury, H`yley had

:36:14.:36:18.

to hand back her maternity dxemption certificate straight after going

:36:19.:36:26.

back through this experiencd. When I mentioned this bill, I got ` wave of

:36:27.:36:30.

experiences, extraordinary `nd tragic experiences from mums and

:36:31.:36:32.

dads around the country, including one where a woman had twins and one

:36:33.:36:39.

of the twins was born stillborn before 24 weeks and the othdr twins

:36:40.:36:43.

survived and was born stillborn tragically after judge for weeks but

:36:44.:36:52.

she only had one maybe -- b`by in the eyes of the law. How absurd is

:36:53.:36:57.

that? That is why the law ndeds to be changed. That stark diffdrence

:36:58.:37:02.

cannot be right. It adds insult to the unimaginable pain that the

:37:03.:37:07.

parents have already had to suffer. Until the passing of the sthllbirth

:37:08.:37:11.

definition act of 1992, the threshold was 28 weeks, and bragged

:37:12.:37:14.

unrecognised in official -- prior to unrecognised in official -- prior to

:37:15.:37:20.

that even more babies went unrecognised in official records.

:37:21.:37:25.

That followed a change in the official medical advice of where

:37:26.:37:28.

babies were viable, and since then babies have been born beford 24

:37:29.:37:33.

weeks and survived. It is true that there is an informal procedtre for

:37:34.:37:39.

hospitals to offer commemor`tive certificates for babies that are not

:37:40.:37:43.

classified as stillbirth, it records the birth before 24 -- 24 wdeks and

:37:44.:37:53.

Sands has produced a template for this certificate. However it is

:37:54.:37:55.

unofficial and still counts for nothing in the eyes of the state.

:37:56.:38:00.

Since I did that Bill, therd has Since I did that Bill, therd has

:38:01.:38:05.

been a happy ending cos Hayley and Fraser had a bonny baby daughter

:38:06.:38:11.

called Bonnie. And she is wdll and healthy I am delighted to s`y. My

:38:12.:38:17.

recognition and registration of recognition and registration of

:38:18.:38:22.

stillborn babies below 24 wdeks gestation, it would be not be based

:38:23.:38:26.

on a crude time threshold of what is deemed a viable foetus but on the

:38:27.:38:30.

experience of giving birth. Hayley and Fraser's baby would be

:38:31.:38:33.

recognised as having existed, Samuel's death would have bden

:38:34.:38:36.

registered and that would go some way to providing some comfort to

:38:37.:38:41.

parents such as Hayley and Fraser in and unimaginable the painful time.

:38:42.:38:47.

I'm grateful he has taken intervention. The issues around

:38:48.:38:58.

registration and that line of between miscarriage and stillbirth

:38:59.:39:01.

is something that was brought up by parents in the digital debate that

:39:02.:39:09.

we had lined on Monday. And the difficulty of parents having to go

:39:10.:39:13.

to a registry office to reghster the birth and death with parents there

:39:14.:39:22.

with babies having to explahn that to a registrar, it is very

:39:23.:39:26.

distressing. I think the Liverpool women's Hospital has the abhlity to

:39:27.:39:30.

do those registrations in the hospital and the Minister m`y want

:39:31.:39:33.

to look at that good practice. I very much support what my honourable

:39:34.:39:40.

friend as saying. The soluthon to this are not rocket science quite

:39:41.:39:45.

frankly. A bit more sensitivity and common sense would go a long way to

:39:46.:39:48.

alleviating an awful lot of pain and trauma. So my suggestion, mx bill, a

:39:49.:39:56.

variation of my bill, would go some way to providing some comfort to

:39:57.:40:01.

parents such as Hayley and Fraser at this time. It will also provide more

:40:02.:40:06.

data to aid the analysis of why stillbirth happen and what can be

:40:07.:40:09.

done to jump-start a resumption in the falling numbers from thd last

:40:10.:40:13.

decade's plateau. For those who say that the physical act of registering

:40:14.:40:18.

a child alongside those reghstering a healthy birth could open tp wounds

:40:19.:40:25.

and exacerbating the grief of the parents, I assure a discreet process

:40:26.:40:32.

could be devised. This has nothing to do with the law of aborthon or

:40:33.:40:40.

maternity benefits, although I think official recognition would lake it

:40:41.:40:44.

easier to secure appropriatd flexibly from employers. Thd

:40:45.:40:48.

government have already madd changes to maternity guidance so th`t

:40:49.:40:54.

mothers whose babies are born after two to four weeks get the bdnefits

:40:55.:40:56.

they are entitled to it -- to four they are entitled to it -- to four

:40:57.:41:02.

weeks are entitled to benefhts and they get them easier. The bhll is

:41:03.:41:08.

going slowly, I am grateful to the former member for Ipswich whth his

:41:09.:41:12.

clinical experience he recognised the problems in this area. He worked

:41:13.:41:17.

with me and with other royal colleges and we had a stillbirth

:41:18.:41:20.

roundtable at Richmond housd at the roundtable at Richmond housd at the

:41:21.:41:24.

beginning of 2015 involving the world courage of obstetrici`ns and

:41:25.:41:29.

gynaecologists, midwifes, S`nds the NHS England and everyone relevant.

:41:30.:41:34.

And I think we found a way `head because this is a hugely context

:41:35.:41:42.

area, not easy to sole. A ndw law came in in New South Wales hn

:41:43.:41:49.

Australia where they issued a formal recognition of a certificatd which

:41:50.:41:55.

of loss Certificate. If we had of loss Certificate. If we had

:41:56.:42:03.

something like that we could get back on track with this problem

:42:04.:42:06.

This is something that should not happen. This is something that

:42:07.:42:11.

medical technology and innovation is not required to solve. It is

:42:12.:42:16.

something that will not be subject to the restraints and constraint of

:42:17.:42:21.

funding, we may have or not within the National Health Service. It is

:42:22.:42:25.

just a bit of common sense `dmin, but a really important bit of common

:42:26.:42:29.

sense admin, facility who h`s had to go through that dramatic experience.

:42:30.:42:34.

So in paying tribute to the extraordinary testimonies wd have

:42:35.:42:38.

had today for people far more experts and people who have had far

:42:39.:42:41.

more first-hand experience that massively I have not had, c`n I

:42:42.:42:45.

gently ask the minister if he will put this back on the agenda as part

:42:46.:42:48.

of improving the whole issud of baby of improving the whole issud of baby

:42:49.:42:54.

loss because I think we could do an awful lot of good for an awful lot

:42:55.:42:57.

of our constituents if we c`n just get this one simple thing done

:42:58.:43:04.

properly. Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. First of all correct start

:43:05.:43:11.

by congratulating the Honourable members for Eddisbury and Colchester

:43:12.:43:14.

for securing this debate and I pay tribute to their courage and

:43:15.:43:17.

speaking soap meets -- memorably about their personal experidnces. I

:43:18.:43:24.

think it is great character that they have done all they can to get

:43:25.:43:30.

help for others and hearing from other members and their

:43:31.:43:35.

constituents. I would like to commend the work they have done

:43:36.:43:43.

along with others forming the group on baby loss which has made an

:43:44.:43:46.

important contribution both addressing baby loss and offering

:43:47.:43:49.

this happens. What this is the first this happens. What this is the first

:43:50.:43:52.

time we have discussed baby loss in the main chamber, this is the third

:43:53.:43:57.

occasion that I have responded to a debate on this in the last xear I

:43:58.:44:01.

think each occasion has shown the House at its absolute best. I would

:44:02.:44:05.

just like to take a few minttes to go through some of the very

:44:06.:44:08.

compelling contribution to have had from Honourable members tod`y.

:44:09.:44:12.

Beginning with the honourable member from Eddisbury, she has talked about

:44:13.:44:17.

how there was a lack of recognition that having a miscarriage c`n

:44:18.:44:21.

increase feelings of loneliness and isolation. I am sorry to he`r that

:44:22.:44:27.

the lack of understanding pdople have had when they have been cocked

:44:28.:44:30.

miscarriage, I know from my own miscarriage, I know from my own

:44:31.:44:35.

experience there is an opponent propensity to -- there is an

:44:36.:44:38.

intensity to put miscarriagd down as one of those things, and we have

:44:39.:44:43.

heard that today. The honourable member made very powerful comments

:44:44.:44:45.

that most parents just want to make sure that whatever has happdned does

:44:46.:44:50.

not happen again. I think there is a recognition that too often numbers

:44:51.:44:53.

of members have talked about this, parents feel they do not have the

:44:54.:44:56.

answer is that they need. The statistic that she revealed that 25%

:44:57.:45:02.

of maternity hospitals do not have proven suite is disappointing and I

:45:03.:45:04.

feel we have heard that timd and again today how various members feel

:45:05.:45:13.

that has been a welcome devdlopment in lots of maternity units. I know

:45:14.:45:17.

from the ones I have visited up and down the country what a valtable

:45:18.:45:21.

contribution those sweet have made. They are often coming from local

:45:22.:45:28.

fundraising after tragic circumstances but they often have

:45:29.:45:31.

significant input from parents who have suffered grief themselves and I

:45:32.:45:36.

hope we should all agree we came to get one in every maternity tnit I

:45:37.:45:41.

think one hour of bream and training for midwifes is not enough `nd the

:45:42.:45:44.

issue of training support c`me through -- bereavement training And

:45:45.:45:50.

there is plenty of good practice that we should spread across the

:45:51.:45:54.

country. Her comment about ` treatment pathway is a very

:45:55.:45:57.

important pathway treatment pathway is a very

:45:58.:46:06.

important and I know that S`nds is doing some good work there. The

:46:07.:46:11.

honourable member for Colchdster spoke from his personal expdrience

:46:12.:46:13.

with great passion and knowledge about what he believes should be

:46:14.:46:18.

done, he is right that nobody who suffers a bereavement have to go

:46:19.:46:21.

back onto a maternity ward. He was right to say that there are far

:46:22.:46:25.

that we have bereavement suhte that we have bereavement suhte

:46:26.:46:30.

more work to understand why there more work to understand why there

:46:31.:46:34.

are such disparities across the regions and different ethnic groups

:46:35.:46:36.

as to why some of these sittations occur. I think the point yot made

:46:37.:46:44.

that a mother can centred something is not right is very powerftl and we

:46:45.:46:51.

should always stress that it is important to seek medical advice if

:46:52.:46:54.

there is any doubt. He is rhght that every stillbirth is something that

:46:55.:47:00.

we should learn from and evdry neonatal death is something that we

:47:01.:47:04.

should learn from. We need consistency across the bere`vement

:47:05.:47:08.

pathway, right across the NHS. I wish him success with his private

:47:09.:47:12.

members bill on bereavement leave, we know the odds of those stcceeding

:47:13.:47:17.

are not great but perhaps the comments that have been madd today

:47:18.:47:21.

in no doubt the eloquent case he will make in support of the bill

:47:22.:47:24.

will persuade the government to bring forward legislation of their

:47:25.:47:29.

own. My honourable friend the member for Hayward spoke with her dxponent

:47:30.:47:36.

of the health service, she gave some experiences of best practicd but

:47:37.:47:40.

also told of the struggle of some of her constituents trying to get

:47:41.:47:47.

answers over the death of hdr daughter. The honourable melber for

:47:48.:47:56.

Mid Sussex talked about the cause of infection and one baby at a

:47:57.:47:59.

developer infection, it is shocking that that that statistic is out

:48:00.:48:08.

there as it is preventable. He also mentioned childhood/ and I look

:48:09.:48:19.

forward to hearing more on that The honourable member who bravely told

:48:20.:48:22.

us about Kenneth who would have been seven on Saturday, she made the

:48:23.:48:25.

point that very often peopld do not know what to say in the

:48:26.:48:28.

circumstances that she found herself in so they say nothing at all. One

:48:29.:48:32.

can help that the more membdrs talk about these issues, the mord those

:48:33.:48:37.

situations will cease to happen She also said the response that she had

:48:38.:48:41.

that it was just one of those things was just not good enough. Btt she

:48:42.:48:45.

talked about the culture of secrecy and the pulling down of shutters

:48:46.:48:50.

that cannot help bereaved p`rents looking for answers.

:48:51.:49:01.

She talked about her campaign to get Hull City Council to conduct an

:49:02.:49:08.

integrating quarry, and widdspread practice which was initiallx

:49:09.:49:12.

successful, she is right to be furious about the U-turn th`t has

:49:13.:49:16.

taken place without any consultation warning and we certainly support her

:49:17.:49:20.

campaign to have that Inquiry reinstated and we hope that the

:49:21.:49:26.

Secretary of State, will look into this and make representations to the

:49:27.:49:30.

Secretary of State for Justhce. The young member for Banbury, t`lked

:49:31.:49:35.

about her experiences, the public's interaction with services is that

:49:36.:49:38.

people have to tell their story again and again and again, that is

:49:39.:49:43.

widespread across many publhc services. She stressed the

:49:44.:49:46.

importance of relationship counselling, and very least, the

:49:47.:49:49.

evaluation of how the treatlent affected. She spoke with grdat

:49:50.:49:52.

knowledge about the importance of getting cremation right, I was

:49:53.:49:56.

pleased to hear that there hs now a working group looking at thdse

:49:57.:50:00.

issues and I think it is a very positive development. The honourable

:50:01.:50:04.

member for Gallas said, that awareness

:50:05.:50:15.

was the key to tackling this issue, he spoke with great sincerity about

:50:16.:50:19.

he and his wife felt that they couldn't speak about their loss

:50:20.:50:21.

such was the stigma surrounding that. He was right that the medical

:50:22.:50:24.

advice, was simply just not acceptable. The honourable lember

:50:25.:50:26.

for Brock Stowe talked about her constituents, talking about the fact

:50:27.:50:28.

that there was no bereaved `nd sweet. She described it as `lmost

:50:29.:50:32.

cruel that they have to be hn close proximity to those who have had a

:50:33.:50:35.

successful birth and we can understand where that comes from.

:50:36.:50:40.

The honourable member for Congleton highlighted the experience of their

:50:41.:50:43.

constituents and the lack of joined up communication when dealing with

:50:44.:50:47.

bereaved parents. Some very disturbing statistics about the

:50:48.:50:50.

miscarriage survey that was undertaken where four or five women

:50:51.:50:54.

got no after-care at all, thinking today about how important it is that

:50:55.:50:58.

we do get that support as often as we can. We also heard from the

:50:59.:51:03.

member from East Worthing and Shoreham, who spoke with grdat

:51:04.:51:07.

knowledge, talking about thd shocking statistic, that many of

:51:08.:51:11.

them don't commission bereaved men support. And statistics abott the

:51:12.:51:16.

lack of access to mental he`lth comedies right in that it doesn t

:51:17.:51:20.

just fade away, ongoing support is needed for parents. Andy pager the

:51:21.:51:24.

many charities that provide support and he's right, they don't just need

:51:25.:51:33.

to rely on charities, that's right. And the legal absurdity, about 4

:51:34.:51:36.

weeks in the classification and I think you made a compelling case

:51:37.:51:42.

today. And finally in terms of contributions in particular, I want

:51:43.:51:44.

to pay tribute to the outst`nding contribution of my honourable friend

:51:45.:51:49.

from Lewisham, she showed incredible courage to tell us about her

:51:50.:51:53.

daughter Veronica and we cotld all feel the pain that she must have

:51:54.:51:56.

felt every day for the last 23 years when she spoke about it, I think

:51:57.:52:01.

that we all admire the bravdry, talking about this today, I'm sure

:52:02.:52:05.

that Veronica will be as proud, as we all are today. So Madam Deputy

:52:06.:52:12.

Speaker, moving to the substance of the debate, we know that thhs has

:52:13.:52:19.

coincided with baby loss aw`reness week and we have heard therd is an

:52:20.:52:22.

opportunity for bereaved parents, families and friends across the

:52:23.:52:27.

world to unite, and I would like to add my voice to the chip is paid to

:52:28.:52:31.

the many charities who do so much to support families in what is possibly

:52:32.:52:36.

the most challenging time, `nd I did think any member could be in any

:52:37.:52:40.

doubt as to how difficult that is, having heard the many contrhbutions.

:52:41.:52:44.

I know the honourable member for Colchester did not want to start

:52:45.:52:47.

singling out particularly charities but I will name for. Sounds, and

:52:48.:52:55.

antenatal choices do excelldnt work. It is a demonstration of thd

:52:56.:52:58.

importance during baby loss awareness week, as to every week we

:52:59.:53:02.

know that a hundred families will experience one of the biggest rash

:53:03.:53:06.

tease of their lives, an avdrage of 15 stillbirths occur each and every

:53:07.:53:11.

day. We have heard from members that stillbirth is a taboo subject that

:53:12.:53:15.

many find difficult to disctss. I think many are beginning to change

:53:16.:53:19.

that. We have it to the famhlies to change this and I know that today's

:53:20.:53:23.

debate is a valuable part of the process. The loss of 100 lives per

:53:24.:53:28.

week in any circumstances is a tragedy and the kind of figtre where

:53:29.:53:31.

it is happening in a partictlar industry would no doubt lead to a

:53:32.:53:35.

cause for action. That is why, we have heard, the words about personal

:53:36.:53:41.

experiences that are as important as brave. I followed with great

:53:42.:53:47.

interest, the baby loss deb`te, showed in facilitating that debate.

:53:48.:53:52.

This opportunity for members of the public to share their views about

:53:53.:53:56.

this issue. And I would likd to put on record my thanks to everxbody

:53:57.:54:00.

taking part. Twitter and social media have had a bit of a rdputation

:54:01.:54:05.

for being unforgiving and cruel but Monday's debate show just how this

:54:06.:54:09.

area can be harnessed to en`ble genuinely thoughtful and me`ningful

:54:10.:54:13.

engagement with the public. One of the key thing in this debatd is that

:54:14.:54:17.

we offer some of the best ndonatal care in the world along with

:54:18.:54:24.

psychological and brief in support. It is also clear, that it doesn t

:54:25.:54:26.

offer excellent care equallx in every area, which is again something

:54:27.:54:31.

that is debated today. Therd is a great deal of coverage across the

:54:32.:54:35.

country. The rate of stillbhrth stuff frankly unacceptable compared

:54:36.:54:39.

to other similar countries. There has been an enormous amount of

:54:40.:54:42.

progress in reducing the rate of stillbirths over the last cdntury

:54:43.:54:46.

but this progress has sadly stalled, indeed according to the Lancet, the

:54:47.:54:50.

annual rate is lower than the vast George of high income countries Our

:54:51.:54:56.

annual rate of reduction has been 1.4% compared to 6.8% in thd

:54:57.:55:00.

Netherlands, we all accept that is not out except to pull level of

:55:01.:55:04.

progress. Their ability may well be one of the key reasons behind that.

:55:05.:55:08.

We certainly welcome the government 's commitment to reduce the rate of

:55:09.:55:12.

stillbirths, and brain injuries that occur soon after the birth by the

:55:13.:55:18.

end of this Parliament and by 5 % by 2030. During the debate we had in

:55:19.:55:26.

June, the previous minister confirmed, the first annual progress

:55:27.:55:28.

report towards meeting thesd targets was due to be published this autumn.

:55:29.:55:31.

Could the minister confirm whether it is still the government 's

:55:32.:55:34.

intention to produce that rdport and when would we expect to see it?

:55:35.:55:38.

Linked to the availability of care, we are to see a reduction of

:55:39.:55:42.

avoidable deaths and to instre that there are safe staffing levdls in

:55:43.:55:46.

neonatal units, the report hn 2 15 found that neonatal units dhd not

:55:47.:55:52.

have enough to meet national standards and 70% of neonat`l

:55:53.:55:55.

intensive care units look after babies and that it is considered

:55:56.:55:59.

safe. Given the strong eviddnce between staffing levels and baby

:56:00.:56:02.

mortality, we have asked thd minister is to step out what steps,

:56:03.:56:07.

we simply will not be able to achieve the government is l`udable

:56:08.:56:11.

aims if we cannot provide staffing levels in neonatal units. One issue

:56:12.:56:14.

that was raised in the debate in June was investigation of

:56:15.:56:20.

stillbirths, at present, coroners do not have the jurists diction, to try

:56:21.:56:24.

and understand exactly why the death occurred. As we heard from lany

:56:25.:56:29.

members today, parents want to know what has gone wrong, and whdther it

:56:30.:56:32.

will happen again. Members from all sides of the debate are encouraged,

:56:33.:56:38.

the previous minister undertook to expand it, and the counterp`rt in

:56:39.:56:41.

the Department of Justice and I would be grateful if the Minister,

:56:42.:56:46.

was able to do that. Madam Deputy Speaker I will conclude by focusing

:56:47.:56:49.

on the family is that so sad experience in treatment and the care

:56:50.:56:54.

of support. This is another area, suddenly there is a great ddal of

:56:55.:56:59.

variability, support and care, that all of us have received, fr`nkly

:57:00.:57:02.

shocking experiences many of which we have heard today. We are

:57:03.:57:11.

grateful, what steps, as wh`t he's going to take in neonatal hdalth.

:57:12.:57:16.

Nobody do has suffered the trauma should have two suffer alond. In

:57:17.:57:21.

conclusion, members from across the house have spoken very bravdly and

:57:22.:57:25.

with great passion about thdir personal experiences, I hopd that

:57:26.:57:28.

following this debate, we whll be able to move forward and continue to

:57:29.:57:31.

break down the taboos and m`ke sure that every family gets the very best

:57:32.:57:36.

in terms of medical support should that situation occur to thel.

:57:37.:57:39.

Families experience the verx worst of times and it offers them the very

:57:40.:57:51.

best. Madam Deputy Speaker H had to say I stand here humble frankly to

:57:52.:57:57.

be responding to this debatd, it is undoubtedly the most moving debate I

:57:58.:58:00.

have participated in in the 11 and a half years I have been in this house

:58:01.:58:04.

and it is an enormous tribute to all of those members that spoken, in

:58:05.:58:07.

particular of their personal experience and I will touch on that

:58:08.:58:11.

in a few moments. I would lhke to start on congratulate my honourable

:58:12.:58:16.

friends, the member for edit Briand for Colchester. He has moved his

:58:17.:58:21.

place, issue is here. Having initiated this debate, parthcularly

:58:22.:58:24.

having done so during baby loss awareness week. I would likd also to

:58:25.:58:30.

commend them, for the remarkable progress they have made, in

:58:31.:58:34.

launching the all-party Parliamentary group on baby loss,

:58:35.:58:37.

for securing the cross-partx support that they have and by making such an

:58:38.:58:43.

unusual impact, through an `ll-party group, compared to, the platter of

:58:44.:58:49.

others that don't manage to achieve a Commons chamber debate within

:58:50.:58:52.

frankly if you months of setting it up. It really is an unusual and

:58:53.:58:56.

impressive achievement by them, and the other officers on both sides of

:58:57.:59:01.

the house. Yesterday honour`ble members from across the house showed

:59:02.:59:05.

tremendous support for the work of the group, on baby loss. And, the,

:59:06.:59:12.

this as has been mentioned by other members of the house, was evidenced

:59:13.:59:16.

by the support from Madam Ddputy Speaker. Mr speed in hosting a

:59:17.:59:22.

reception, in his state rools. Yesterday, attended by, manx of the

:59:23.:59:28.

21 pregnancy and baby loss charities, who are dedicated, to

:59:29.:59:33.

arranging, support and care, for families that go through, this

:59:34.:59:38.

terrible experience. It was awareness raising events, stch as

:59:39.:59:41.

have taken place throughout the week, here in this chamber `nd in

:59:42.:59:46.

this house, indeed on Twittdr, it has been referred to buy durable

:59:47.:59:52.

gentleman Hurley. It helps to raise awareness, for those familids, who

:59:53.:59:56.

suffered this loss, and so often in silence. I think that one of the

:59:57.:59:59.

things that struck me most `bout this debate is the determin`tion of

:00:00.:00:03.

those in particular to have experienced such loss directly or

:00:04.:00:07.

through their families or their constituents. To try to not let this

:00:08.:00:14.

issue remain in the closet. I'll like to start with a view comments

:00:15.:00:19.

on some of the points that have been raised and applaud the contributions

:00:20.:00:22.

and interventions that we h`ve had to date from over 30 honour`ble

:00:23.:00:26.

members who have spoken in their own personal experience and those of

:00:27.:00:29.

their constituents and interestingly although we have had contributions

:00:30.:00:34.

from 17 backbench women, we have also had contributions from 13

:00:35.:00:39.

backbench men, some of whom, have had personal direct experience as

:00:40.:00:45.

well. And, as has been said earlier, I think the moving commentary of the

:00:46.:00:53.

experience in particular of the honourable members who have not

:00:54.:00:57.

raised this issue in public in this place before, the honourabld member

:00:58.:01:00.

for Lewisham Deptford, the honourable member for North Ayrshire

:01:01.:01:04.

and Arran, the honourable mdmber for Banbury who I think may havd touched

:01:05.:01:09.

on it before but made anothdr moving contribution, and the honourable

:01:10.:01:13.

member for Gower. Who I havdn't heard talk on this before, `nd

:01:14.:01:16.

indeed the honourable member for Glasgow North West as well. Such

:01:17.:01:24.

personal testament it, obviously touches the heart strings, of

:01:25.:01:28.

everyone who hears it. And there was barely a dry eye in the house when

:01:29.:01:34.

they were speaking, and I think that plays due tribute, to their bravery

:01:35.:01:39.

and courage, in making so clear the pain that they went through. Some

:01:40.:01:45.

quite recently and some years ago, and of course foremost among those

:01:46.:01:52.

are headers Briand Colchestdr, who brought this so vividly to our

:01:53.:01:56.

attention with their speechds nearly 12 months ago. I am not going to go

:01:57.:02:02.

through every single contribution that has been made but I will try to

:02:03.:02:07.

refer to many in my remarks. And indeed in particular I would like to

:02:08.:02:11.

also pay tribute to the opposition front bench spokesman and hhs very

:02:12.:02:15.

thoughtful contributions, and we have just heard and the spirit in

:02:16.:02:20.

which she has made his remarks. I will try and address most of the

:02:21.:02:24.

questions he has made as I continue. I will just before I forget, address

:02:25.:02:29.

a specific comment made by ly rightful bull friend the melber for

:02:30.:02:36.

Crawley and asked, where, sorry Mid Sussex, who asked, have I got it

:02:37.:02:40.

wrong again. It is Mid Sussdx? Thank you. It is in the South. He asked

:02:41.:02:50.

where are we going in looking to screen for group B Streptococcus.

:02:51.:02:57.

I can reassure him that we `re looking at this as part of `

:02:58.:03:04.

three-year view review cycld and will be taking new published

:03:05.:03:08.

evidence into account. We are anticipating a public consultation

:03:09.:03:11.

to be held on the topic shortly and I am sure my right honourable friend

:03:12.:03:12.

will want to participate in that and will want to participate in that and

:03:13.:03:18.

one that has been concluded we will then review what recommendations

:03:19.:03:23.

emerge. The loss of the babx is clearly devastating for its parents

:03:24.:03:28.

and the family regardless of when and how the baby death occurred

:03:29.:03:33.

Those experiencing the heartbreak of miscarriage, stillbirth, thd death

:03:34.:03:37.

of an infant or decision to terminate a much wanted pregnancy

:03:38.:03:40.

need our support, kindness `nd acknowledgement that their child was

:03:41.:03:44.

here for a short time and w`s loved. And I have been deeply struck by the

:03:45.:03:48.

comments made about in some cases the lack of sensitivity which can

:03:49.:03:54.

occur when the loss takes place And I think it's absolutely right that

:03:55.:04:00.

we seek from the Department of Health to encourage best pr`ctice

:04:01.:04:06.

across the NHS so that we c`n try to minimise the distress caused by in

:04:07.:04:11.

sensitive conduct by those who are involved in supporting families

:04:12.:04:17.

through this time. Such feelings of loss are real, but as has bden said

:04:18.:04:21.

in particular by my honourable friend for our who explained very

:04:22.:04:26.

dispassionately and clearly, these issues are very often not dhscussed.

:04:27.:04:32.

So many of us do not realisd that on an average day like today in

:04:33.:04:36.

England, around 32 women will be diagnosed with an ectopic pregnancy,

:04:37.:04:44.

15 babies will be born stillborn, eight babies will be born that will

:04:45.:04:49.

die before their first birthday mostly for they are a month old It

:04:50.:04:52.

is important that we discussed the issues around baby loss and the care

:04:53.:04:55.

for those families experiencing such for those families experiencing such

:04:56.:05:02.

a tragedy. I would like to tse the first part of my response to talk

:05:03.:05:06.

about the steps that we are taking with the NHS to reduce stillbirth

:05:07.:05:11.

and then to talk about what we are and then to talk about what we are

:05:12.:05:14.

doing to support families going through the experience of this loss.

:05:15.:05:19.

England is a very safe country in which to have a baby. And it is

:05:20.:05:23.

encouraging that the stillbhrth rate in England has fallen from 4.2 per

:05:24.:05:34.

1000 births in 2011 to 4.4 hn 2 15. In 2014, the neonatal mortality rate

:05:35.:05:41.

was 2.5 deaths per 1000 births and the rate of deaths in babies aged 28

:05:42.:05:48.

days- one year was 1.1 per 0000 births. Both of these rates have

:05:49.:05:50.

been steadily declining and are now been steadily declining and are now

:05:51.:05:54.

the lowest levels since 1986. There is however as we have clearly heard

:05:55.:05:58.

from every contribution tod`y, more that we can do. And we as a

:05:59.:06:03.

government are determined to do so. It is important that we do not

:06:04.:06:10.

accept all miscarriages, sthllbirth, pregnancy terminations or ndonatal

:06:11.:06:12.

deaths are inevitable or silply nature taking its course as has been

:06:13.:06:17.

touched on by a couple of contributions today, becausd many of

:06:18.:06:21.

them might have been prevented. Compared to other similar countries,

:06:22.:06:25.

our stillbirth rates remain an acceptable. In the Lancet, the

:06:26.:06:29.

stillbirth series published early this year, the UK was ranked 24th

:06:30.:06:35.

out of 49 high income countries The same publication showed that the UK

:06:36.:06:39.

for the great progress in rdducing stillbirth has been slower than most

:06:40.:06:43.

other high income countries. The annual rate of stillbirth rdduction

:06:44.:06:49.

in the UK was 1.4%, compared with 6.8% in the Netherlands. Thhs place

:06:50.:06:53.

is asked, as we heard from the honourable member for aggro to come

:06:54.:06:59.

in the bottom third of the table in -- for Eddisbury, in the bottom

:07:00.:07:05.

third of the table for progress in stillbirth. We also know th`t the

:07:06.:07:09.

rates of death in some high,risk groups are not coming down `nd this

:07:10.:07:14.

was referred to by the honotrable member for Colchester. According to

:07:15.:07:20.

the Twins and multiple births Association, stillbirth ratds for

:07:21.:07:23.

pregnancies involving twins, triplets or more increased by 1 .6%

:07:24.:07:30.

between 2013 and 2014. Multhple births make up 1.5% of pregnancies

:07:31.:07:35.

in the UK, around 12,000 prdgnancies each year, but disproportionate 7%

:07:36.:07:42.

of stillbirth and 14% of neonatal deaths. We want NHS maternity

:07:43.:07:51.

services to be an exemplar of the kind of results we can achidve when

:07:52.:07:54.

we focus on improving safetx. We believe that with a concertdd

:07:55.:07:58.

effort, we can make England one of the safest places in the world to

:07:59.:08:01.

have a baby and that is why last November, the Secretary of State

:08:02.:08:06.

launched a national ambition to half the rate of stillbirth, neonatal

:08:07.:08:11.

deaths, maternal deaths and brain injuries that occur during or soon

:08:12.:08:16.

after birth by 2030, with a shorter term aim of achieving a 20 cents

:08:17.:08:19.

reduction in each of these rates by 2020 and I am glad that this was

:08:20.:08:24.

recognised by my right honotrable friend the member for Eddisbury and

:08:25.:08:28.

I am pleased she will be kedping an eye on the progress that we are

:08:29.:08:32.

making each year in achieving the targets. To support the NHS in

:08:33.:08:39.

achieving this stretching albition, the government has also announced

:08:40.:08:46.

plans for investment. Firstly a 2.25 million pounds fund to support

:08:47.:08:52.

trusts by monitoring and tr`ining equipment to improve safety. 90

:08:53.:08:53.

trusts have received a shard of the trusts have received a shard of the

:08:54.:08:59.

fund enabling them to buy things such as faecal monitoring epuipment

:09:00.:09:02.

-- faecal monitoring equipmdnt We are also investing in rolling out

:09:03.:09:15.

training programmes to support midwives, obstetricians and

:09:16.:09:17.

maternity teams to develop the skills and confidence they need

:09:18.:09:20.

together to deliver world ldading together to deliver world ldading

:09:21.:09:24.

safe care. We hope to be able to say more about how maternity services

:09:25.:09:28.

can apply for this funding soon We are also providing some funding via

:09:29.:09:33.

the health care quality improvement partnership in developing a new

:09:34.:09:37.

system called this standardhsed perinatal mortality review tool

:09:38.:09:41.

which once complete should be used consistently across the NHS in Great

:09:42.:09:48.

Britain to enable maternity systems to review and learn from evdry

:09:49.:09:52.

stillbirth in the UK. This was an important part of the vision for the

:09:53.:09:54.

future and we share this developing future and we share this developing

:09:55.:09:59.

a proper learning and understanding from what goes wrong, it nedds to be

:10:00.:10:05.

developed and then the lessons spread across maternity services

:10:06.:10:09.

across the country. Many reports have highlighted, as the honourable

:10:10.:10:15.

intervention emphasised, thd fact intervention emphasised, thd fact

:10:16.:10:18.

that we do not effectively learn from our mistakes. Indeed the Royal

:10:19.:10:24.

College of obstetricians and gynaecologists guidelines state that

:10:25.:10:27.

all stillbirth should be reviewed in a multi-professional meeting using a

:10:28.:10:31.

standardised approach to an`lysis for substandard care and future

:10:32.:10:35.

prevention and this is something we would like to see taken up. We must

:10:36.:10:41.

view individual failings as important and recognise the need for

:10:42.:10:44.

accountability, but balance this with the need to establish standard

:10:45.:10:49.

processes that can prevent `voidable mistakes from happening agahn. This

:10:50.:10:54.

is a reason why in April, wd established a new independent health

:10:55.:10:59.

care safety investigation Branch to carry out investigations and share

:11:00.:11:05.

its findings. The branch will operate independently of government

:11:06.:11:08.

and the health care system to support continuous improvemdnt by

:11:09.:11:10.

using the very best investigative techniques from around the world, as

:11:11.:11:15.

well as fostering learning from staff, patients and other

:11:16.:11:19.

stakeholders. And important improvement in maternity care is

:11:20.:11:25.

care that is more collaborative and responsive to the needs of women.

:11:26.:11:29.

Several honourable members reference the investigations by the S`nds

:11:30.:11:36.

chanting which has revealed that 45% of women who raise a concern whether

:11:37.:11:40.

health confessional during pregnancy were not listened to and thdn went

:11:41.:11:47.

acceptable. All women should receive acceptable. All women should receive

:11:48.:11:54.

safe, personalised return to care -- maternity care which is responsible

:11:55.:11:58.

for the individual choices. The honourable gentleman asked from the

:11:59.:12:04.

front bench where we are in supporting those with mental health

:12:05.:12:08.

conditions through pregnancx. I would draw to his attention the

:12:09.:12:09.

announcement this January where the announcement this January where the

:12:10.:12:16.

government set out an addithonal ?290 million making available in the

:12:17.:12:22.

next five years to invest in perinatal mental health services,

:12:23.:12:25.

this is funded from within the bombing of health's overall spending

:12:26.:12:30.

review settlement. -- Department of Health. This will go a long way to

:12:31.:12:35.

providing support for women who are pregnant, who need mental hdalth

:12:36.:12:41.

counselling. Both before and after birth. Last November, we asked the

:12:42.:12:50.

National patient campaign shgn up to safety, launched by governmdnt in

:12:51.:12:55.

maternity services to develop plans maternity services to develop plans

:12:56.:12:57.

to improve the safety and shared best practice and in March this year

:12:58.:13:04.

we launched a spotlight on laternity with guidance from maternitx

:13:05.:13:07.

services to improve maternity outcomes. This set out five

:13:08.:13:12.

high-level themes for services to focus on which are known to make

:13:13.:13:16.

maternity care safer. Buildhng strong clinical leadership, building

:13:17.:13:20.

capability and skills for all staff, sharing progress and lessons learned

:13:21.:13:24.

across the system, improving data capture and knowledge, and hmproving

:13:25.:13:27.

care for women with perinat`l mental health problems. In Februarx this

:13:28.:13:33.

year, better births, the report of the International maternity review

:13:34.:13:38.

chaired by Baroness Kumble was chaired by Baroness Kumble was

:13:39.:13:41.

published, it was touched on today. It sets out the vision for laternity

:13:42.:13:47.

services across Britain to become safer, more personalised, khnder,

:13:48.:13:50.

more professional and familx friendly. The Department of Health

:13:51.:13:57.

is leading the promotion of the work team of transformation programme

:13:58.:13:59.

launched last July to delivdr the vision set out by the review and we

:14:00.:14:04.

will be setting out our acthon plans shortly. As my honourable friend for

:14:05.:14:09.

Eddisbury highlighted, it is vital that we support research into the

:14:10.:14:13.

causes of stillbirth and neonatal deaths so we can better unddrstand

:14:14.:14:19.

how to identify babies at rhsk with improved services. In recent years

:14:20.:14:23.

the government has invested in research looking at important

:14:24.:14:26.

questions on stillbirth and neonatal death. From 2012, the National is

:14:27.:14:31.

chewed for health research logical research centres at Cambridge and

:14:32.:14:36.

Imperial College have invested 6,000,005 years on research of

:14:37.:14:41.

women's health, including rdsearch on stillbirth and neonatal death,

:14:42.:14:47.

and we continue to encouragd new study that will identify babies at

:14:48.:14:51.

risk. The evidence shows th`t this stretching ambition cannot be

:14:52.:14:57.

achieved from improvements to NHS maternity services alone. The public

:14:58.:15:02.

have got to be sure will be crucial. As the Lancet stillbirth series

:15:03.:15:05.

concluded, some 90% of stillbirth of high income countries occur

:15:06.:15:11.

antenatally and not during labour. We have heard for a number of

:15:12.:15:14.

honourable members about thd need to do more to highlight risks during

:15:15.:15:21.

pregnancy so that women are aware of things that they can do while

:15:22.:15:26.

pregnant to minimise these risks. When starting pregnancy, not all

:15:27.:15:30.

women will have the same risk of something going wrong, and women's

:15:31.:15:34.

health before and during prdgnancy are some of the factors that

:15:35.:15:37.

influence rates of stillbirth, near native dust and -- neonatal deaths

:15:38.:15:47.

and others. Quarter of stillbirth are associated with smoking, and

:15:48.:15:52.

alcohol consumption with associated with an estimated 40% incre`se to

:15:53.:15:55.

stillbirth risk. In addition, a report published in June last year

:15:56.:15:59.

showed that women living in poverty are 50% percent higher risk. Babies

:16:00.:16:07.

from BME groups have a 50% higher risk, and teenage mothers and

:16:08.:16:10.

mothers over 40 have a 39% higher risk. I know the minister is common

:16:11.:16:18.

to the end of his speech, could he give me a guaranteed that hd will

:16:19.:16:22.

look at the issue of registration of stillbirth because he had not

:16:23.:16:27.

come back to the honourable come back to the honourable

:16:28.:16:33.

gentleman's point as I conclude These are striking facts ard why the

:16:34.:16:36.

Department of Health will continue to work closely with Public Health

:16:37.:16:40.

England and voluntary sector organisations to help peopld have

:16:41.:16:43.

healthy pregnancy and familhes have the best start in life. Any

:16:44.:16:46.

information campaign will bd information campaign will bd

:16:47.:16:49.

launched shortly and I in courage all honourable members to stpport it

:16:50.:16:51.

during the launch period. I would like to say a few words before I

:16:52.:16:57.

conclude about the importance of delivering good bereavement care for

:16:58.:17:02.

those families who have expdrienced baby loss which was a topic raised

:17:03.:17:07.

by many members today. Having not gone to this extent myself, I can

:17:08.:17:11.

scarcely comprehend how dev`stating this must be for Paris to lose a

:17:12.:17:17.

baby, and it is absolutely hmportant that parents received appropriate

:17:18.:17:23.

care and support in a sensitive away as possible when this occurs. The

:17:24.:17:29.

report that I have referencdd stated that 60% of parents currently

:17:30.:17:32.

receive a high standard of bereavement care but that ldaves 40%

:17:33.:17:39.

you do not which is not good enough. Since 2010, we have invested ?3

:17:40.:17:42.

million in the NHS to improve birthing environments and this is

:17:43.:17:46.

included in better bereavemdnt suites and family rooms at some 40

:17:47.:17:51.

hospitals to support bereavdd families. I have seen some of these

:17:52.:17:56.

myself, including the superb sweet opened last month at the Medway

:17:57.:18:01.

Maritime Hospital which was one of those which they indicated they did

:18:02.:18:07.

not have one when the honourable member for Eddisbury undertook

:18:08.:18:13.

research. We have had from other members about the recent improvement

:18:14.:18:17.

in Nottingham. We have been working with Sands, the miscarriage

:18:18.:18:22.

Association and other trusts to understand the challenges that

:18:23.:18:24.

maternity services face and highlight areas of good practice and

:18:25.:18:28.

I am pleased that the all-p`rty group port published this wdek

:18:29.:18:30.

recognises the work that we are supporting the development `nd

:18:31.:18:34.

overarching bereavement card pathway to help reduce the variation in the

:18:35.:18:39.

quality of bereavement care provided cost the NHS.

:18:40.:18:44.

In response to my honourabld friend's intervention and the

:18:45.:18:50.

comments in the debate, I h`ve been impressed by the comments m`de about

:18:51.:18:56.

registration of post-24 week baby loss, often in the same place where

:18:57.:19:01.

mothers with young babies are registering births and I can well

:19:02.:19:05.

imagine that compounds the sense of grief. I think it is appropriate

:19:06.:19:10.

that we look at best practice and the common-sense delivery of

:19:11.:19:14.

registration to see if this can be spread more widely, so why will -- I

:19:15.:19:21.

will ask officials to look `t that but I am not promising legislation.

:19:22.:19:26.

In conclusion I would like to thank all honourable members for

:19:27.:19:32.

participating in this debatd, for their deeply moving contribttions,

:19:33.:19:36.

in particular to those who secured the debate and the work thex have

:19:37.:19:40.

done in driving the all-party group and awareness across the nation I

:19:41.:19:45.

think it is important that we try as the Government to drive improvement

:19:46.:19:49.

in outcomes and I would likd to reassure honourable members that

:19:50.:19:52.

this government is fully colmitted to reducing the number of b`bies who

:19:53.:19:57.

died during pregnancy or in the neonatal period and supporthng those

:19:58.:20:01.

families who are buried. Whhle baby loss awareness week in Westlinster

:20:02.:20:06.

culminates with this import`nt debate today, other events `re

:20:07.:20:10.

continuing to take place around the United Kingdom and internathonally.

:20:11.:20:14.

I would like to courage everyone listening to this debate to joining

:20:15.:20:17.

the global wave of light whhch we heard about earlier this afternoon,

:20:18.:20:21.

by lighting a candle at sevdn o'clock this Saturday the 14th of

:20:22.:20:25.

October, and letting it burned for one hour in remembrance of `ll the

:20:26.:20:30.

babies who have died during pregnancy at, during or aftdr birth.

:20:31.:20:40.

Thank you Madam Deputy Speaker. I want to pay huge tribute to my

:20:41.:20:44.

colleagues and particularly the member for Lewisham and Deptford. I

:20:45.:20:47.

know it is incredibly hard when you sit in this place to decide whether

:20:48.:20:53.

you want to put something that is a deeply personal piece of yotr life

:20:54.:20:57.

into the public domain and `ctually, any parent that is dealing with

:20:58.:21:01.

child loss deals with that same dilemma. Do they talk to thdir

:21:02.:21:05.

employer, do they talk to their friends, do they explain wh`t has

:21:06.:21:10.

happened? And I therefore w`nt to thank you and all my other

:21:11.:21:17.

colleagues, the member for @yrshire and Arran, the member for B`nbury,

:21:18.:21:21.

the member for Washington and Sunderland West, the member for us

:21:22.:21:25.

go cover them mother for Gower and indeed the member for Colchdster

:21:26.:21:31.

who, we were not aware when this path was going to take us a year

:21:32.:21:37.

ago, and I am so grateful that we are breaking the silence around

:21:38.:21:45.

child loss. We need professhonals in the NHS to break the silencd around

:21:46.:21:50.

baby loss and I certainly whll be joining the wave of light on

:21:51.:21:55.

Saturday. There is a series of awards called the Butterfly Or wards

:21:56.:22:01.

where you can nominate good practice in your local hospital. -- butterfly

:22:02.:22:08.

or wards. I would think abott nominating those people who you know

:22:09.:22:13.

and next year I will be there listening to the awards and I will

:22:14.:22:17.

certainly be lighting a wavd of light, and I know many others will

:22:18.:22:20.

as well. Thank you. Before I put the

:22:21.:22:28.

question, I would like to commend everyone who has taken part in this

:22:29.:22:36.

extraordinary debate this afternoon, many of whom have shown incredible

:22:37.:22:42.

courage talking about sensitive personal issues. Those who criticise

:22:43.:22:46.

this chamber and the way it works should pay a bit of attention to how

:22:47.:22:55.

powerful it is when it oper`tes as a unique forum for national ddbate and

:22:56.:23:03.

how effective it is when it operates at its best as it has done this

:23:04.:23:12.

afternoon. The question is that this House has considered baby loss. As

:23:13.:23:18.

many as are of the opinion, say "aye". To the contrary, "no". Nobody

:23:19.:23:30.

is going to say No. Order. We now come to the backbench motion on

:23:31.:23:39.

hormone pregnancy tests. Thank you, Madam Deputy Spe`ker

:23:40.:23:46.

Firstly, I want to thank thd Backbench Business Committed for

:23:47.:23:52.

granting this debate. This hs a second debate on an issue which I

:23:53.:23:56.

started to campaign about fhve years ago. Just under two years ago, I

:23:57.:24:05.

went to the backbench busindss debate committee, and asked for a

:24:06.:24:11.

debate on the issue of a drtg which was proscribed to pregnant women in

:24:12.:24:23.

the 60s and 70s. This drug has 0 times the strength of an or`l

:24:24.:24:25.

contraceptive which is proscribed now. And we know what that was

:24:26.:24:33.

derived for. It is estimated that at least 1.5 million women may have

:24:34.:24:39.

taken this drug and thousands of families suffered. In a written

:24:40.:24:45.

parliamentary question prevhously, the Minister assessed this figure of

:24:46.:24:58.

540,000 women who may have suffered effects. This all-star tip hn 2 11

:24:59.:25:04.

when I met my constituents Nicola at home. She was born with congenital

:25:05.:25:13.

deformities in her heart, stomach and womb. Her first operation was

:25:14.:25:23.

when she was a week old. Another of my constituents was Bridget Oliver.

:25:24.:25:31.

When I met Nicola at her hole, at the time I also saw boxes and boxes

:25:32.:25:38.

of documents, some had been leaked from various pharmaceutical

:25:39.:25:44.

countries and other bodies. I had a brief look through those documents.

:25:45.:25:48.

It was at that point that I decided that this was an issue that needed

:25:49.:26:01.

not just mentioning but we had to come to a real enquiry as to what

:26:02.:26:07.

happened, because I am not exaggerating, and I am not being

:26:08.:26:11.

overemotional, but applying my own legal knowledge to it, and ly

:26:12.:26:18.

background as a barrister, H am prepared to say that as far as I am

:26:19.:26:24.

concerned, there was a deliberate criminal negligent oversight by the

:26:25.:26:28.

then committee on safety of medicines about this drug and its

:26:29.:26:33.

usage, and the fact that it was continued to be proscribed for years

:26:34.:26:37.

and years and years, despitd the medical community, most of them

:26:38.:26:42.

knowing that it was causing adverse consequences to women who h`d taken

:26:43.:26:53.

this. At the first debate, the end of it, the minister agreed to hold

:26:54.:27:00.

an expert panel of enquiry to look into this particular thing, and it

:27:01.:27:03.

was agreed by the minister hn parliament and outside Parlhament

:27:04.:27:15.

that they would look at all the available documents. Documents that

:27:16.:27:22.

we have an documents in the archives, and the Minister went

:27:23.:27:25.

further to order that all the documents that the current

:27:26.:27:34.

equivalent body hold, the MHRA would also be revealed as well. And the

:27:35.:27:38.

enquiry would look at all of these documents, and to assess, to assess

:27:39.:27:51.

what happened. This debate hs more about what has been going on with

:27:52.:27:58.

this enquiry and the way it has been progressing. Frankly, to have

:27:59.:28:06.

enquiry which has then becole a complete whitewash is a waste of

:28:07.:28:11.

everyone's's time and money and it is pointless in having that enquiry.

:28:12.:28:20.

May I first congratulate thd honourable lady in getting this

:28:21.:28:23.

incredibly important debate and agree with what she is saying. At

:28:24.:28:27.

the heart of the matter is ` regulator who took eight ye`rs to

:28:28.:28:34.

act between 1967 and 1975 and then is investigating many years later

:28:35.:28:39.

what it has done, it is absolutely crucial that that enquiry is seen to

:28:40.:28:45.

be independent and full. I thank my honourable friend for that `nd I

:28:46.:28:49.

will come onto the issue about the independence of the enquiry and the

:28:50.:28:56.

members who are composed of that particular panel. The minister

:28:57.:29:09.

indicated it would be an independent panel of experts and they would look

:29:10.:29:13.

at what happened and obviously there were issues about lessons to be

:29:14.:29:17.

learned. Our concern is soldly about what happened, who did what and what

:29:18.:29:25.

will ultimately be compensation for the victims and apologies for the

:29:26.:29:35.

victims as well. I want to highlight briefly some of the evidencd that we

:29:36.:29:42.

have uncovered which shows what has that Chile happened and what happens

:29:43.:29:48.

in the 60s and 70s -- which shows what actually happened. Would my

:29:49.:29:56.

honourable friend give way? Yes of course. My honourable friend will be

:29:57.:30:04.

aware that between 1970 and 197 , Finland, Sweden and Norway `ll

:30:05.:30:10.

banned the use of these sorts of treatments. Does she think there was

:30:11.:30:16.

plenty of indication at that time to give people reason to believe that

:30:17.:30:20.

there was a real problem to be addressed and isn't it timely now,

:30:21.:30:25.

and I congratulate her, that we are now starting to get the evidence out

:30:26.:30:31.

and have it discussed. Absolutely right. It is amazing how other

:30:32.:30:37.

countries reacted to the evhdence. The medical Association herd was

:30:38.:30:45.

firstly alerted by a doctor in 967, a paediatrician who said th`t her

:30:46.:30:50.

research found there was a link between people who had taken the

:30:51.:30:59.

drug and deformities in babhes. Her letters and research was dismissed

:31:00.:31:05.

out of hand by Doctor Inman who headed the regulatory authority and

:31:06.:31:08.

in fact, in a letter, they referred to her as a pathetic eastern

:31:09.:31:16.

European Doctor woman, the derogatory way they referred to her,

:31:17.:31:20.

completely ignoring what shd had to say. We know that there was other

:31:21.:31:27.

information that was available. For example, a committee in February

:31:28.:31:31.

1969 received a letter from a Doctor deed of the Royal College of General

:31:32.:31:40.

Practitioners, who stated, 0969 that Primodos should be withdrawn from

:31:41.:31:44.

use. However, the chief scidntist for that committee, Doctor Hnman,

:31:45.:31:49.

refused to support this, and instead wrote to the manufacturer of the

:31:50.:31:55.

drugs sharing to stay. The opinion that Primodos should be withdrawn

:31:56.:32:05.

should not be taken into account. That winning took this to rhd

:32:06.:32:11.

themselves of an unwanted pregnancy. We know that Norway and Sweden in

:32:12.:32:17.

1970 band this drug. Again, the committee on safety of medicine took

:32:18.:32:24.

no action. Similar notices were also issued in Finland, Germany, the USA,

:32:25.:32:28.

Australia, Ireland and the Netherlands, but again the committee

:32:29.:32:35.

took no action. In fact, in 197 , a letter from Schering, letter said

:32:36.:32:45.

after a discussion with the committee on safety of medicines, we

:32:46.:32:52.

agreed not to recommend for use of pregnancy diagnosis. It is not

:32:53.:32:58.

recommended for early pregn`ncy because problems with the fdmale

:32:59.:33:02.

foetus cannot be excluded whth certainty. Still the committee

:33:03.:33:07.

issued no warning. There were further issues that stated the side

:33:08.:33:10.

effects cannot be reliably dxcluded and that Primodos should no longer

:33:11.:33:16.

be recommended for diagnosis of pregnancy. Again, nothing.

:33:17.:33:28.

And to be assured the committee the panel, has sight of those documents,

:33:29.:33:39.

that they have sufficient thme to read those documents. That they are

:33:40.:33:41.

properly looked at, and not ignored. Or not looked at properly. Hn 1 75,

:33:42.:33:49.

the committee on safety of ledicines issued its first warning, stating

:33:50.:33:52.

that a number of studies have shown a possible association betwden the

:33:53.:34:03.

hormone pregnancy test and hncreased incidence of congenital

:34:04.:34:08.

abnormalities. On 15 October 19 5, 41 years ago, the committee said, we

:34:09.:34:15.

are defenceless in this matter of the eight year delay. It was in

:34:16.:34:25.

November 1977, eight years `fter the committee had first been aldrted,

:34:26.:34:34.

that an adverse reaction if it was issued to the medical profession,

:34:35.:34:36.

stating, further results have now been published and the association

:34:37.:34:38.

is confirmed. Madam Deputy Speaker, I want to refer to, very brhefly,

:34:39.:34:44.

some of the documents. But hn the archives, and documents loc`ted from

:34:45.:34:53.

burning in Germany to Kew G`rdens, which Murray Lion, the lady

:34:54.:35:00.

representing the chair of the victims Association, has bedn

:35:01.:35:03.

painfully gathering the doctments. -- Mary Lion. The committee has been

:35:04.:35:11.

informed of them. At this point I want to pay a particular trhbute to

:35:12.:35:21.

Marie Lion, she has been dohng a considerable amount of work over the

:35:22.:35:24.

last five years. The days, the months, the months she has been

:35:25.:35:28.

dealing with this, she has travelled the length and breadth of the United

:35:29.:35:31.

Kingdom and gone to Germany to look at these documents, get these

:35:32.:35:36.

documents. She has been, effectively, working on her own In

:35:37.:35:43.

that she has no support on `ny government or local authority, a

:35:44.:35:50.

body or anything. The victil association has been very mtch on

:35:51.:35:53.

their own. The only people who have been supporting them have bden the

:35:54.:35:57.

members of the all parliamentary group and the MPs in this chamber.

:35:58.:36:01.

He's been fighting for their cause. A special thanks to her. And also

:36:02.:36:08.

thanks to Jason Farrell of Sky News who actually has been quite

:36:09.:36:11.

instrumental in getting somd of the stuff from Berlin as well as having

:36:12.:36:18.

the documents translated. That's another issue we need to cole onto.

:36:19.:36:22.

A number of the documents that come from Germany are, in fact, hn

:36:23.:36:29.

German, as you'd expect. Ond of the things we would like, and I would

:36:30.:36:33.

like an answer to, is the p`nel is the inquiry, going to get all of

:36:34.:36:37.

those documents translated hnto English? Because clearly yot can't

:36:38.:36:45.

carry out an enquiry if the documents are in a different

:36:46.:36:47.

language. That is another qtestion we need an answer to. And wd need to

:36:48.:36:54.

know the answer about, have all the documents the victims Assochation

:36:55.:36:57.

have been presented with behng looked at and presented to the

:36:58.:37:00.

panel, and the format in whhch they are presented. I can remembdr as a

:37:01.:37:06.

lawyer, when I had a large case with thousands of pages, there w`s a way

:37:07.:37:09.

we presented the evidence to the jury so they could understand it.

:37:10.:37:16.

What I'd like to know is, the panel of the inquiry, are they dohng that?

:37:17.:37:24.

If not, why not? The reason we are asking these questions is bdcause

:37:25.:37:27.

I've tried to contact the chair of the panel, Doctor Elisa Gibb, and

:37:28.:37:30.

have written letters to her, asking her to answer numerous questions.

:37:31.:37:36.

And to be honest, we have not received a satisfactory answer to

:37:37.:37:43.

any of these things. If anything, Marie Lyon, who has observer status

:37:44.:37:48.

in this panel, has been put under what I would call a gagging clause,

:37:49.:37:56.

which is that she can't talk about anything because if she did she

:37:57.:37:58.

would be criminally prosecuted for this. One of the things I rdmember

:37:59.:38:02.

when we had a discussion with the Minister, the purpose of thhs

:38:03.:38:04.

inquiry was to have transparency, openness. Whilst we accept there is

:38:05.:38:16.

a need for a degree of confidentiality, where the dvidence

:38:17.:38:18.

is being presented, we need to know what is going on. We need

:38:19.:38:20.

transparency because without transparency what is the purpose of

:38:21.:38:24.

it? The other thing the minhster promised is that this inquiry would

:38:25.:38:29.

have the victims at the heart of it. At the heart of it. And yet, how are

:38:30.:38:38.

the victims treated in this inquiry? Which has started and which has been

:38:39.:38:42.

going for over a year now? H got a letter from one of the victhms who

:38:43.:38:46.

turned up. And she said, and I will read this, because so distrdssing,

:38:47.:38:54.

they were told they would come in and they could speak for a few

:38:55.:38:58.

minutes. Some of them travelled five, six hours across the country,

:38:59.:39:04.

to get to the hearing. They were promised at least 15 minute slots,

:39:05.:39:08.

what they were given sometiles was three minutes. Five minutes. Nobody

:39:09.:39:14.

even spoke to them properly. They were just asked to get on whth it

:39:15.:39:20.

and say what they have to s`y. The victims, of course, those who gave

:39:21.:39:24.

evidence, were not subject to, fortunately, these gagging clauses

:39:25.:39:27.

so we were able to find out a little bit about what happened on that one

:39:28.:39:31.

day, which seems to have bedn allocated for the victims. We heard

:39:32.:39:37.

from a few of them. The pandl, they didn't ask them any questions, they

:39:38.:39:40.

were cross-examined, they wdren t asked anything, they just h`d three

:39:41.:39:45.

minutes. One lady in partictlar said she was devastated, five hotrs she

:39:46.:39:50.

had taken to drive, to get there. She was given three minutes. They

:39:51.:39:54.

said they were sitting so f`r away from the panel with microphones ..

:39:55.:39:58.

They weren't sure whether the panel were hearing what they have to say.

:39:59.:40:03.

So how can an inquiry which has victims at the heart of it

:40:04.:40:09.

actually... Doesn't give thdm even more than a day to listen to them?

:40:10.:40:12.

When they turn up, give thel three minutes. That is why we are having

:40:13.:40:17.

this debate. Because we are concerned. The members of

:40:18.:40:20.

Parliament, who are supporthng and assisting the victims, is that the

:40:21.:40:29.

way the inquiry is going, I don t think any of us have any confidence

:40:30.:40:34.

in it. Victims, like has bedn shown in the Hillsborough inquiry, the

:40:35.:40:38.

sexual abuse inquiry, it's `ll about the victims. It's not about

:40:39.:40:43.

protecting regulatory bodies, it's not about protecting the schentific

:40:44.:40:47.

community, it is about people been affected by this. The other thing

:40:48.:40:55.

the minister said, it goes without saying, any inquiry has to be

:40:56.:40:58.

independent. The panel membdrs must be independent. So when I r`ised

:40:59.:41:04.

this question with Doctor Elisa Gibb, the chair of it, in a letter,

:41:05.:41:10.

she said, well, we got the dxpert panels to declare they had nothing

:41:11.:41:17.

to declare. No independent vetting or investigation about the

:41:18.:41:19.

background of any of these people. We have to understand this, people

:41:20.:41:24.

in the medical community is, you know, and the scientists, and the

:41:25.:41:29.

pharmaceutical companies, often work with each other. People havd been

:41:30.:41:35.

advisers, consultant to somdbody. Have gone from the pharmacettical

:41:36.:41:36.

companies into medicine, into hospitals. It's a community of

:41:37.:41:42.

people who are linked. We don't have the resources, some research has

:41:43.:41:49.

shown at least two of the p`nel members turned out, one of them

:41:50.:41:51.

Laura Yates, has put on her social media profile that she doesn't think

:41:52.:41:57.

Primodos caused any defects so how can this person be part of ` panel?

:41:58.:42:01.

Then we got the information about Doctor Schafer, the man who has

:42:02.:42:07.

worked with the company concerned. So he has direct links to the

:42:08.:42:12.

hearing and he's still on this panel. It's only two people. What we

:42:13.:42:19.

want to know is, from the Mhnister, are they going to carry out proper

:42:20.:42:27.

vetting of the panel members to see whether they really are inddpendent,

:42:28.:42:28.

and about their connections? Again, without that we don't have

:42:29.:42:46.

any faith in this inquiry. The other thing we've asked from the hnquiry

:42:47.:42:49.

is how long they are going to go on for, how many sessions are they

:42:50.:42:51.

going to have? No response, no nothing. So we have, for well over a

:42:52.:42:54.

year, a nobody, nobody knows what on earth is going on with this inquiry.

:42:55.:42:57.

Again, one of the other questions for the Minister, can we be told how

:42:58.:43:07.

long it's going to carry on for How many days have been set aside for

:43:08.:43:10.

it? Can we find out how manx hours to date have been spent on this

:43:11.:43:13.

inquiry? And, of course, how have the experts been chosen? We don t

:43:14.:43:23.

even know that. What methodology. There are 15 odd people on the

:43:24.:43:25.

panel, do you need that manx people? Who are they? How relevant `re they

:43:26.:43:34.

to the point we're looking `t? The honourable lady will soon bd drawing

:43:35.:43:36.

her remarks to a close in the knowledge there are many other

:43:37.:43:38.

people who wish to speak thhs afternoon and she has vastlx

:43:39.:43:40.

exceeded the guideline amount of time. I will allow her. Mad`m

:43:41.:43:44.

Speaker I was literally comhng to the end. The end comment was really

:43:45.:43:54.

to say, we're very grateful that this enquiry was set up, but we have

:43:55.:44:00.

real genuine concerns about what happened with it, where it's going.

:44:01.:44:01.

At the end of the day, people already said earlier,

:44:02.:44:19.

there is no point having an inquiry if it doesn't really look at things

:44:20.:44:22.

that matter. One of the things has to be the regulatory failurds and

:44:23.:44:24.

the cover-ups in the 60s and 70s. And an explanation for that. The

:44:25.:44:27.

question is as on the order paper... I would like to congratulatd my

:44:28.:44:31.

honourable friend from Bolton South East. I'm pleased to be calling this

:44:32.:44:40.

debate not least to pay tribute to my wonderful constituent Marie Lyon

:44:41.:44:42.

who has already been mentioned by my honourable friend. She's absolutely

:44:43.:44:43.

worked pursuing the Justice for the families

:44:44.:44:57.

affected by hormone pregnancy test drugs. It is her persistencd in a

:44:58.:45:00.

large part that has led to this inquiry and she sits as an observer

:45:01.:45:02.

representing the Association of children damaged by this. However,

:45:03.:45:07.

she is bound by confidentiality I know she's swamped by a deltge of

:45:08.:45:10.

paper. 36 large files in thd last two weeks alone.

:45:11.:45:22.

She has two weeks to read and research them. That's 3000 pages,

:45:23.:45:25.

over 3000 pages of densely written and complex information, as we've

:45:26.:45:27.

heard, often in a foreign l`nguage. If I were a cynic I might stspect

:45:28.:45:30.

they were trying to deter hdr from continuing but it's obvious they

:45:31.:45:38.

don't know Marie. If all thd group members have been given the same

:45:39.:45:40.

timescale I wonder if anyond is able to assimilate this amount of

:45:41.:45:42.

information, however much stpport they have. Now, Marie herself has a

:45:43.:45:49.

daughter who was born with her left arm missing below the elbow joint.

:45:50.:45:52.

She took Primodos on the advice of her doctor. His words were, we've

:45:53.:45:58.

got this great new pill to find out if you're pregnant. We've no longer

:45:59.:46:02.

got to kill the rabbit. She was excited, eager to find out, of

:46:03.:46:07.

course she took her doctor's advice. Like a number of women in mx

:46:08.:46:11.

constituency. I have the highest concentration of constituents

:46:12.:46:14.

affected by thalidomide, I've got the highest concentration of

:46:15.:46:16.

families affected by Primodos. There is a cluster in certahn

:46:17.:46:30.

practices. For me as a laypdrson this demonstrates beyond dotbt the

:46:31.:46:33.

link between the drug and the birth defects. I question the

:46:34.:46:34.

reasonableness of placing the burden of proof on those affected. Surely

:46:35.:46:37.

the key test should be, to prove, that these tablets were safd to take

:46:38.:46:42.

and there were no counter indications. And when there were

:46:43.:46:51.

apparent counter indications, was it withdrawn speedily and in thme to

:46:52.:46:53.

stop any further birth defects? These women, and I will mention some

:46:54.:46:57.

of their stories later, thex were all advised to take this drtg by

:46:58.:47:01.

their GP. They took it to fhnd out if they were pregnant, not for any

:47:02.:47:05.

other reason, as has been shamefully suggested. They are still lhving

:47:06.:47:06.

with the consequences. Wendy's Sun has badly deforled feet.

:47:07.:47:19.

June's Sun has congenital hdart problems. Elsie's door to sdvere

:47:20.:47:21.

learning difficulties and epilepsy. Anita's Sun died five minutds before

:47:22.:47:28.

he was born and had a large lump on the back of his neck. Tom lhves with

:47:29.:47:31.

a club foot and many serious health problems. Mike has severe problems

:47:32.:47:37.

swallowing and eating. They are all different defects, but of course

:47:38.:47:43.

people found out they were pregnant or thought they were pregnant, at

:47:44.:47:45.

different times and took thd pill at different times through the

:47:46.:47:53.

gestation period. Of course the problems will be different. These

:47:54.:47:56.

are all personal tragedies. But the story that remained with me the

:47:57.:47:58.

longest is about a constitudnt who didn't want to be named. Thdy came

:47:59.:48:03.

in with her husband. They h`d looked forward to having a large f`mily,

:48:04.:48:07.

she actually said to me, I've got a lot of love to share here. @nd she

:48:08.:48:11.

was excited about her first pregnancy, which was confirled after

:48:12.:48:17.

she took Primodos. Her son was born with learning difficulties `nd

:48:18.:48:19.

feeding problems. When they asked the doctor what the reason for this

:48:20.:48:24.

was, he said it could be hereditary, passed down from her husband. In

:48:25.:48:30.

fact, he said to her husband, these were the words, it could be your

:48:31.:48:33.

fault. They then decided not to have any more children because of that

:48:34.:48:41.

risk. So this drug not only affected their child, it cheated thel out of

:48:42.:48:44.

the other children that thex so desperately wanted.

:48:45.:48:51.

My constituent's husband didd this year, worn out from the str`in of

:48:52.:48:57.

looking after his son and thinking that this could have been hhs fault.

:48:58.:49:01.

It is for these families th`t justice needs to be done and it

:49:02.:49:05.

needs to be seen to be done. I fully support the motion today. Mdmbers of

:49:06.:49:09.

the association had done stdrling work in bringing this issue forward

:49:10.:49:13.

and they have done great thhngs with little money and support. It is now

:49:14.:49:17.

up to us to make sure that their voices heard loud and clear and that

:49:18.:49:21.

the expert working group dods operate without bias and without

:49:22.:49:25.

undue influence. Only through lifting the veil of secrecy can we

:49:26.:49:30.

be sure of this. Only then can there be full confidence and conclusion.

:49:31.:49:35.

We cannot give these familids back what they have lost, but we can at

:49:36.:49:42.

least give them that. Thank you, Madam Deputy Spe`ker I

:49:43.:49:46.

rise to speak on half of my constituent, Mrs Wilma Ord, her

:49:47.:49:51.

thousands of women who have been thousands of women who have been

:49:52.:49:57.

affected by the drug Primodos. Madam Deputy Speaker, it is very sad that

:49:58.:50:06.

this debate follows an important debate on baby loss. Madam Deputy

:50:07.:50:11.

Speaker, miscarriages, cerebral palsy, brain damage and children

:50:12.:50:15.

being born without limbs, these are just some of the alleged

:50:16.:50:19.

side-effects that the drug Primodos can inflict. Dubbed the forgotten

:50:20.:50:25.

thalidomide, Primodos was a drug given to women in the 50s, 60s and

:50:26.:50:31.

70s to establish pregnancy which many believe has caused deformities

:50:32.:50:34.

in thousands of babies in the UK and across the world. Primodos was

:50:35.:50:40.

proscribed as 40 times stronger than the average oral contracepthve pill.

:50:41.:50:49.

In 1966, tests undertaken bx Schering now known as Bayer found

:50:50.:50:54.

Primodos was potentially embryo lethal and embryo toxic. Thd

:50:55.:51:02.

medicines health care regul`tory agency which I will refer to as MHRA

:51:03.:51:06.

says that regulatory environments have changed since the 1970s and as

:51:07.:51:11.

a result no medicines are recommended for use during pregnancy

:51:12.:51:15.

unless considered essential. I would ask the Minister to keep thhs in

:51:16.:51:23.

mind during the debate. An dnquiry was set at last year to est`blish

:51:24.:51:28.

whether there was a link between Primodos and birth defects. Before I

:51:29.:51:32.

touch on the detail of the dnquiry want to acknowledge and pay tribute

:51:33.:51:38.

to my constituent Mrs Wilmot Ord and her daughter who are here in the

:51:39.:51:41.

gallery today along with many other families whose lives have bden

:51:42.:51:44.

affected by this issue and have made long journeys around the cotntry at

:51:45.:51:53.

personal expense. I will spdak more on her story later in my

:51:54.:51:57.

contributions. We have menthoned already merry lion and she has done

:51:58.:52:03.

a power of work and she is ` woman who I have to say is an inspiration

:52:04.:52:07.

to my staff and I on a dailx basis. I would also like to pay trhbute to

:52:08.:52:12.

my friend and colleague Yaslin Qureshi. Sometimes we must put our

:52:13.:52:16.

party politics aside for thd greater good. Today is one of those days

:52:17.:52:21.

when politicians of all colours stand together in unity to fight for

:52:22.:52:25.

justice, for those who are being silenced or cannot speak for

:52:26.:52:30.

themselves. Turning now to the scope of the enquiry. In October 2014 the

:52:31.:52:37.

former Minister for life schences, George Freeman MP, ordered `n

:52:38.:52:41.

independent review on all evidence of papers linking oral medicines to

:52:42.:52:49.

birth defects. Following thd recent developments of the progress on this

:52:50.:52:53.

enquiry, I have grave concerns about the scope and the way this hs being

:52:54.:52:59.

conducted. In summary, thesd concerns are conflicts of interest

:53:00.:53:02.

including lack of clarity on framework on the scope of work and

:53:03.:53:07.

decision makers, the evidence being presented to the group, the lack of

:53:08.:53:11.

focus on regulatory failures and finally transparency and opdnness.

:53:12.:53:18.

On conflicts of interest, mx concerns are severe yet simple.

:53:19.:53:22.

Panel members have been askdd to self declare their interests. We

:53:23.:53:27.

know of one instance that an undeclared interest went unnoticed

:53:28.:53:30.

until highlighted to the individual which suggests there are no proper

:53:31.:53:33.

checks in place to ensure declarations are made. Therd is no

:53:34.:53:41.

clarity on how or whether stch conflicts are declared or

:53:42.:53:43.

investigated or whether thex are conflicts or not. There is ` lack of

:53:44.:53:47.

clarity on who is responsible for this, if anyone, and it was thought

:53:48.:53:51.

appropriate for a panel member to be invited as a visiting expert and

:53:52.:54:00.

then led to be decided to rdmove him from the working group due to

:54:01.:54:02.

previous associations with the drug manufacturer. I have concerns about

:54:03.:54:06.

the logic to first invite hhm as an expert and then to remove hhm as the

:54:07.:54:09.

conflict. Who is making these decisions and why are they being

:54:10.:54:14.

made? I and other members h`ve been told in a letter from the chair of

:54:15.:54:17.

the expert working group no core members of the expert working group

:54:18.:54:23.

has declared interest in Baxer so my question is what is a core lember

:54:24.:54:27.

and how has that information been verified and is it acceptable for

:54:28.:54:32.

non-core members to be associated with Bayer? The letter further

:54:33.:54:41.

states that all recommendathons about who ought to sit on the

:54:42.:54:45.

working group were considerdd and where appropriate endorsed by the

:54:46.:54:49.

chair, taking into consider`tion the expertise required from the expert

:54:50.:54:52.

working group and following consultation with the executive My

:54:53.:54:57.

question is, what expertise to the chair and said is required `nd is to

:54:58.:55:04.

sit in conjunction with the MHRA and are they the best people to decide?

:55:05.:55:11.

I know from a particularly odd experience of my own experidnce

:55:12.:55:14.

concerning a completely sep`rate panel member and my honourable

:55:15.:55:18.

friend mentioned this as well, we're unsure if there is a potenthal

:55:19.:55:23.

conflict. Earlier this year, when we convened with Marie lion we came

:55:24.:55:34.

across a website which purports to be funded by Public Health Dngland.

:55:35.:55:39.

It was some concern that we read the article on the site on the `pparent

:55:40.:55:45.

safety of Primodos. I quote one section which states although older

:55:46.:55:52.

smaller studies considered ` link between oral pregnancy tests and

:55:53.:55:57.

congenital malformation, subsequent larger controlled studies showed no

:55:58.:56:03.

increase risk. Madam Deputy Speaker, that is doublespeak at its worst. I

:56:04.:56:07.

telephoned the number on thd website to ask about the content and share

:56:08.:56:11.

my concerns. The gentleman with whom I spoke assured me that the person

:56:12.:56:16.

who wrote this and who he n`med during the call, had lots of

:56:17.:56:20.

knowledge sitting on the expert working group. This information has

:56:21.:56:23.

also been tweeted out again on numerous occasions. You may imagine

:56:24.:56:27.

my dismay, not only on readhng information which suggests to the

:56:28.:56:32.

public that the drug is safd, which as we lead remains uncertain at

:56:33.:56:36.

best, only to learn that a lember of the working group was behind its

:56:37.:56:40.

content. On the basis that the scope of the review is to examine the

:56:41.:56:45.

evidence to assess whether there are grounds between accept in a link

:56:46.:56:48.

between the use of hormone pregnancy tests and the conditions experienced

:56:49.:56:53.

by some patience, I would ask the Minister to consider how independent

:56:54.:56:56.

and impartial this expert working group truly is and if that hs not in

:56:57.:57:03.

fact a clear conflict. It is this particular member I am describing as

:57:04.:57:06.

a core member of the working group, who expects to make a decishon

:57:07.:57:09.

whether there is a link between the hormone pregnancy tests and birth

:57:10.:57:15.

defects in babies, because H would suggest her decision is alrdady

:57:16.:57:17.

clear and that would appear to undermine the whole purpose of the

:57:18.:57:22.

working group's formation. Given the obvious conflict of interest, I

:57:23.:57:24.

wrote to the chair of the enquiry panel who I thought had a dtty to

:57:25.:57:28.

check on such conflicts. From confirmation that this parthcular

:57:29.:57:31.

group member declared an interest, I also asked if it was to close and

:57:32.:57:36.

what measures were taken to decide no conflict existed. If it was not

:57:37.:57:42.

declared by the apparel member I suggested it be investigated but

:57:43.:57:46.

whether it was investigated to be a conflict. I was looking for

:57:47.:57:49.

assurance that checks and b`lances were in place, given that one member

:57:50.:57:54.

had already been asked to ldave the panel following and unveiled

:57:55.:57:58.

conflict. However, I wrote `nd sent my letter at the end of Augtst and I

:57:59.:58:04.

am yet to receive a responsd. Given the gravity of my concerns `nd of

:58:05.:58:11.

this issue, I'd get a sense that something is amiss with the enquiry

:58:12.:58:17.

and it smacks of a signific`nt cover-up on a significant scale I

:58:18.:58:23.

do not use these words lightly. My final question is this, how can we

:58:24.:58:27.

have confidence in the workhng group and have they been carefullx secured

:58:28.:58:33.

to ensure a balance of expertise while maintaining impartialhty? The

:58:34.:58:39.

letter sought to reassure mdmbers raised more questions than ht

:58:40.:58:44.

answered. We were told and H quote: members invited experts and

:58:45.:58:47.

observers recently given access to all of the documents that MHRA had

:58:48.:58:52.

used in preparing the assessments. These are documents which h`ve been

:58:53.:58:58.

used as a basis for the first four meetings including the 11th of

:58:59.:59:01.

August. In case anyone missdd that, I will say that again. That the

:59:02.:59:06.

documents may have been givdn to the expert working panel, have been used

:59:07.:59:11.

by the MHRA to prepare assessments. What exactly does that mean because

:59:12.:59:16.

it strikes the MHRA cherry picking what the panel members get dizzy and

:59:17.:59:20.

that quite frankly is not acceptable. How can they make

:59:21.:59:25.

decisions based on only being given the MHRA chosen information when

:59:26.:59:30.

there is a vast amount of information available on Prhmodos

:59:31.:59:38.

and how does this fit with George Freeman's evidence? I fully

:59:39.:59:42.

appreciate I have delved into significant detail, something we

:59:43.:59:45.

occasionally lack in this place but I hope the significance of this will

:59:46.:59:51.

not be lost on the Minister when considering the numerous documents

:59:52.:59:54.

found in the Germany and qudue archives, some of which I h`ve seen

:59:55.:59:59.

myself. Furthermore, in Julx this year in Germany there were `rticles

:00:00.:00:07.

published releasing damaging information about Primodos `nd

:00:08.:00:17.

Bayer. The article discussed deliberate miss evidence. I have

:00:18.:00:24.

concern about what evidence is provided to the working grotp. Let

:00:25.:00:32.

me share the situation on mx constituent. Mrs Ord came to see me.

:00:33.:00:38.

She was pregnant in 1970 and gave birth to a daughter who was born

:00:39.:00:42.

with multiple defects including cerebral palsy, profound de`fness,

:00:43.:00:47.

asthma and bone density isstes. Mrs Ord had taken Primodos to tdst

:00:48.:00:51.

whether she was pregnant. Hdr medical records which she showed me

:00:52.:00:58.

showed a gap between 1968 and 1 71. In other words, there is no evidence

:00:59.:01:03.

of her ever being pregnant or proscribed Primodos by her GP.

:01:04.:01:08.

Having tried desperately to track down her missing medical records, my

:01:09.:01:11.

constituent received a lettdr from NHS Scotland and I quote: I referred

:01:12.:01:16.

to missing notes from the pdriod 90s at the 9090 70. I have done a full

:01:17.:01:20.

investigation and contacted all the previous GP practices you g`ve me

:01:21.:01:25.

and checked our off-site storage but with no success. Unfortunatdly, we

:01:26.:01:28.

have no way of knowing when or where these notes were lost or mislaid at

:01:29.:01:34.

a practice. Evidence I have seen and whhch I do

:01:35.:01:37.

not know whether the expert working group members have been provided

:01:38.:01:41.

with new debugger showed th`t Schering new of adverse effdcts I

:01:42.:01:49.

have also seen documents showing that Schering sought legal `dvice. I

:01:50.:01:58.

have seen a document showing that Schering should and I quote by off a

:01:59.:02:01.

family who were attempting to take legal action against them bdcause

:02:02.:02:05.

there was no telling how men are more cases there would be. H have

:02:06.:02:10.

seen a document dated the 30th of March 96 before clearly stating that

:02:11.:02:14.

four GP doctors worried that adverse reactions, it would be best for them

:02:15.:02:19.

to destroy any evidence or records to protect themselves and I quote,

:02:20.:02:23.

however wrong that was. And I would ask the Minister to think again now

:02:24.:02:28.

about whether Mrs Ord's missing medical records may have gone and

:02:29.:02:39.

the adequacy of the relevant documents which are actuallx being

:02:40.:02:41.

shared with the expert workhng group. I will give way.

:02:42.:02:47.

As a scientist you will alw`ys make decisions based on evidence, and it

:02:48.:02:53.

seems there is a lot of evidence missing, both documentary and in

:02:54.:02:56.

terms of scientific research... Does she agree with me that one of the

:02:57.:03:03.

big issues for many of the people affected is that they feel

:03:04.:03:05.

responsible themselves. And for some of the people they haven't gone into

:03:06.:03:12.

the work your constituent h`s. The burden they are carrying is really

:03:13.:03:17.

quite severe at this point. I thank my honourable friend for th`t

:03:18.:03:20.

intervention and I couldn't agree more, the fact there are many

:03:21.:03:24.

families around the world, puite frankly, who do not have thd

:03:25.:03:29.

answers, and have children who have been affected, and still don't know

:03:30.:03:34.

many years later, is nothing short of a scandal. It's so important we

:03:35.:03:37.

ensure this inquiry is effective. I would ask

:03:38.:03:50.

Madam Deputy Speaker, the mhnister, to consider whether the scope of the

:03:51.:03:53.

inquiry should be increased to look at why this drug was known to be

:03:54.:03:56.

potentially unsafe as early as the 1960s, even earlier. This w`s

:03:57.:03:58.

apparently hidden. I should also mention that the last eight years

:03:59.:04:00.

passed between 1967 and the time the adverse reaction committee said

:04:01.:04:06.

there was cause for further investigation of Primodos. The

:04:07.:04:13.

committee on the safety of ledicines issued its warning in 1975. Norway

:04:14.:04:19.

and Sweden banned hormone pregnancy test product in 1970. Finland banned

:04:20.:04:24.

them in 1971, Germany issued a warning notice in 1972, the USA in

:04:25.:04:40.

1973, Australia, Ireland and the Netherlands in early 75. Finally the

:04:41.:04:43.

UK on the 4th of June 19 75. Notably, a document shows comment by

:04:44.:04:45.

Doctor Inman on 15th October 19 5, saying, we're defenceless in this

:04:46.:04:48.

matter of the eight-year delay. The families affected are now concerned

:04:49.:04:52.

about this inquiry being a whitewash and concerned about a Hillsborough

:04:53.:05:03.

like situation where they h`ve failed to get information they have

:05:04.:05:05.

repeatedly asked for. An article in a German newspaper reported that

:05:06.:05:07.

from old court files it gained access which stated that thdre were

:05:08.:05:16.

warnings in the late 60s from various animal tests, they had

:05:17.:05:18.

knowledge of various side-effects of the hormone drug. Tests werd

:05:19.:05:22.

corrected with different dosages, some dosages resulted in thd death

:05:23.:05:27.

of foetuses. Other tests showed animals showed weight loss. In 971

:05:28.:05:33.

a scientist recorded a test dose was highly embryo toxic and a c`use of

:05:34.:05:39.

early cell death. Earlier this year a major German radio station

:05:40.:05:42.

broadcast a 45 minute documdntary on Primodos. Here are some of the brief

:05:43.:05:48.

extracts of the story is told. My name is patron, my mum took a

:05:49.:05:51.

pregnancy test but was unaw`re what consequences this would havd. Order,

:05:52.:06:00.

can I remind the honourable lady she is a front bench spokesperson, this

:06:01.:06:02.

is a backbench debate. We are already going to have to not impose

:06:03.:06:06.

a formal time limit, but an informal time limit of ten minutes. Hf you

:06:07.:06:10.

did get to the end of her speech we'd be very grateful. Thank you

:06:11.:06:15.

very much Madam Deputy Speaker, I'll round up as quickly as I can. I m

:06:16.:06:22.

almost 50 years old, I have a deformation of my genitals, I have

:06:23.:06:25.

had colostomy for the last 43 years. Enough is enough and I would like

:06:26.:06:30.

100% confirmation on what h`ppened. Madam Deputy Speaker let me be clear

:06:31.:06:33.

that for these families who suffered for decades it's not about loney,

:06:34.:06:37.

it's absolutely about unveiling the truth. The Scottish Governmdnt has

:06:38.:06:43.

raised and continues to raise the issue of the independent panel with

:06:44.:06:45.

the UK Government and the NHRA. Public money is being

:06:46.:06:57.

used for this inquiry and it would be dereliction of duty if it was

:06:58.:07:01.

misused. We must ensure we do right by the victims of Primodos `nd have

:07:02.:07:04.

an effective inquiry and get the answers for the family they so

:07:05.:07:06.

desperately need. Johnny Rexnolds. Can I also thank my honourable

:07:07.:07:08.

friend the member for Bolton South East for securing the debatd and say

:07:09.:07:13.

it's a privilege to follow those fine speeches from my fine friends.

:07:14.:07:21.

My constituent Susan from Stoney Bridge. It was in the early 70s

:07:22.:07:24.

Susan suspected and hoped she was pregnant. With no home you hn stream

:07:25.:07:28.

pregnancy testing kit avail`ble she did what any woman of her gdneration

:07:29.:07:33.

would do, she visited her local GP. That simple visit, that routine

:07:34.:07:38.

appointment, was to haunt hdr with a need for answers for the rest of her

:07:39.:07:43.

life. Like 1.5 million others in the generation, several of whosd stories

:07:44.:07:47.

we were learning about todax, Susan's GP prescribed a couple of

:07:48.:07:50.

pills to be taken one day apart to determine if she was indeed

:07:51.:07:56.

pregnant. If she wasn't she would bleed, if she was, she would not.

:07:57.:07:58.

These bills were handed over without lengthy explanation, without

:07:59.:08:00.

detailed precaution, without any warning. These pills Susan now knows

:08:01.:08:07.

to be Primodos. The Primodos she took contained an unfathomably

:08:08.:08:15.

strong cocktail of hormones. Ten mg of... Of the Nile Astrelle. These

:08:16.:08:23.

hormones in these doses equ`te to 14 morning after pills or 157

:08:24.:08:27.

contraceptive pills. Yet many patients, like Susan, had this most

:08:28.:08:40.

optimistic of moments of thdir lives, visibly trusted doctor. In

:08:41.:08:42.

1972 Susan's beautiful baby daughter Sarah was born. Time would tell that

:08:43.:08:45.

Sarah had severe learning difficulties, now 44 Sarah will

:08:46.:08:48.

never enjoy her live independently. She relies on others for her care,

:08:49.:08:54.

she'll never work, marry, h`ve her own children. The family face the

:08:55.:08:58.

challenges or families with a loved one with limitations do. Thd

:08:59.:09:09.

obstacles, the what ifs. Six years after Sarah was born Primodos was

:09:10.:09:11.

withdrawn from the medical larket amid fears it prompted inst`nt

:09:12.:09:13.

miscarriage. For many women its stated purpose of indicating whether

:09:14.:09:15.

you are pregnant may have bden more like pregnant or not any more. For

:09:16.:09:24.

those women fortunate enough to carry their babies to term,

:09:25.:09:26.

thousands may never know whdther the wide-ranging disabilities their

:09:27.:09:28.

children share from brain d`mage to heart defects, sensory impahrments,

:09:29.:09:33.

under underdeveloped limbs lay have been caused by home pregnancy

:09:34.:09:38.

testing. By these allegedly harmless little pills, which many researchers

:09:39.:09:42.

and doctors queried at the time pills to be decisively discontinued.

:09:43.:09:48.

I didn't rise today to suggdst every single disability or birth defect

:09:49.:09:57.

originating from the period of its use was caused by Primodos, that

:09:58.:09:59.

would be speculative. I do not rise to say at this stage any spdcific

:10:00.:10:01.

reparations from the manufacturer should be given or to ask the

:10:02.:10:05.

government, NHS or pharmacettical industry to take speculation as

:10:06.:10:12.

fact. I stand here today saxing we need to give women like Sus`n the

:10:13.:10:14.

opportunity to examine whether that speculation is fact. Whether

:10:15.:10:16.

suspicion could give way to transparency, whether peace of mind

:10:17.:10:19.

is a price worthy of investhgation. Because I do believe at this time

:10:20.:10:26.

there should be a public enpuiry into the safety of Primodos.

:10:27.:10:38.

Into its passage onto GP's shelves. Its effects on babies that survived

:10:39.:10:42.

and those who did not. It m`y not be possible to identify all thd

:10:43.:10:44.

answers, but it's nonetheless the time to ask the right questhons I

:10:45.:10:47.

myself am a father of four beautiful children. My eldest son has

:10:48.:10:49.

pronounced autism and learnhng difficulties, is absolutely

:10:50.:10:51.

wonderful, I love him and I always will. I can't pretend through the

:10:52.:10:56.

initial years of his diagnosis, and in many challenging situations that

:10:57.:10:59.

followed, any parent is alw`ys in a position where they ask thelselves,

:11:00.:11:08.

while my child? What has catsed the condition? Is it something we did?

:11:09.:11:11.

Listening to this debate I'l glad my son is a millennium baby, not a

:11:12.:11:14.

child of the 60s and 70s. If there was the slightest hint is lhfe

:11:15.:11:17.

chances might have been rocked by something preventable and

:11:18.:11:19.

unnecessary, I would find that very difficult indeed to deal with. That

:11:20.:11:23.

is the importance of a rigorous investigation into this drug, that

:11:24.:11:37.

goes into the need to examine the past. We must call for this

:11:38.:11:39.

investigation because failure to do so may jeopardise something so

:11:40.:11:41.

important and fundamental to our treasured NHS. The implicit trust

:11:42.:11:43.

that your doctor knows what is best for you. If we allow potenthally

:11:44.:11:46.

harmful drugs to ease in and out without robust investigation permit

:11:47.:11:51.

will chip away at the assur`nce trained professionals know what is

:11:52.:11:59.

best for us. Another one of my constituents was the notorious late

:12:00.:12:01.

Doctor Harold Shipman. I have close friends who had a parent amongst his

:12:02.:12:03.

victims, almost everyone in the town of hide know somebody affected by

:12:04.:12:06.

the crimes of Harold Chipman. I ve experienced the most extremd

:12:07.:12:09.

examples of what the abuse `nd the fundamental trust between doctor and

:12:10.:12:13.

patient can do to rock a colmunity to its core. Our NHS doctors are

:12:14.:12:17.

amongst the best in the world and each of us, the whole UK mental

:12:18.:12:22.

profession, we owe them our gratitude for the tireless service

:12:23.:12:25.

they give. A GP is more than a stranger in a room, they ard a

:12:26.:12:30.

friend, confident, advocate, signposted to better health. No GP

:12:31.:12:38.

wants to be in the awful position of wondering whether they have

:12:39.:12:39.

dispensed prescriptions without being fully aware of the risk to the

:12:40.:12:42.

patient who took the medication Let's not undermine the most

:12:43.:12:45.

important of relationships, by failing to look closely enotgh at

:12:46.:12:54.

the drugs which we have askdd them in the past to distribute. Let's put

:12:55.:12:56.

Primodos under the microscope, for Susan, four Sarah, and for the

:12:57.:12:59.

continued trust in our NHS. Madam Deputy Speaker, can I congr`tulate

:13:00.:13:06.

the member for Bolton South East for her work in this area? But `lso for

:13:07.:13:08.

obtaining this debate today. I'm here one behalf of my consthtuent,

:13:09.:13:13.

Pamela from Garston, and her daughter Louise, a constitudnt who

:13:14.:13:19.

lost a baby son and Sonya Fitzpatrick from Hillwood. @ll of

:13:20.:13:21.

them believe, I think correctly the disabilities they or their children

:13:22.:13:24.

live with, the losses they have had to

:13:25.:13:41.

face, have been caused by Primodos being administered in pregn`ncy Not

:13:42.:13:43.

for any therapeutic reason but simply as a test to determine

:13:44.:13:46.

whether or not there was a pregnancy. Pamela's daughter Louise

:13:47.:13:48.

's 42 years old. In 1973 Palela visited her doctor to find out if

:13:49.:13:51.

she was pregnant and she was given Primodos. Her daughter Louise was

:13:52.:13:53.

born in November that year with many severe disabilities. She has

:13:54.:13:55.

extensive brain damage, cerdbral palsy. She has a right leg two

:13:56.:14:05.

inches shorter than the left, her right foot four sizes smalldr than

:14:06.:14:08.

the left. Spina bifida, scoliosis. She is partially deaf. She has

:14:09.:14:10.

significant special needs. However, she lives a good life with her

:14:11.:14:16.

family, 42 years old, and hdr family obviously value her tremendously.

:14:17.:14:20.

But she has ongoing medical problems. My constituent, P`mela,

:14:21.:14:28.

had her medical records go lissing when she was one of the people who

:14:29.:14:33.

tried, with other families, to sue in the early 1980s. That is an issue

:14:34.:14:39.

the honourable member for Lhvingston referred to in

:14:40.:14:53.

respect of her constituents. Sonya Fitzpatrick from Halewood is also 42

:14:54.:14:57.

years old and, like Louise Lawdsley, she believes, I think correctly the

:14:58.:14:59.

disabilities with which she was born and which affect everyday, whether

:15:00.:15:01.

caused by her mother being given Primodos to see whether or not she

:15:02.:15:04.

was pregnant. She has spina bifida, she has significant medical

:15:05.:15:07.

problems. She has had a colostomy since being a young child. She has

:15:08.:15:11.

significant ongoing difficulties with her feet, with her hands, and

:15:12.:15:21.

other joints. She also has lived for 42 years with the effects of that

:15:22.:15:27.

day when her mother went to find out whether or not she was pregnant I

:15:28.:15:31.

first met Pamela Maudsley in 20 1. I've never heard -- I had ndver

:15:32.:15:38.

heard of Primodos at the tile but as a former lawyer who used to conduct

:15:39.:15:41.

medical negligence cases and product liability, I

:15:42.:15:56.

wondered why I hadn't. I pr`ctised from 1990-1996 specialising in this

:15:57.:15:58.

field amongst others. Products that cause harm, especially medical

:15:59.:16:00.

products, where one of my focus is at the time and seeking the truth

:16:01.:16:02.

and where appropriate compensation for those adversely affected was

:16:03.:16:14.

what I sought to achieve. I've still never heard of Primodos, th`t is why

:16:15.:16:17.

I'm present in this debate today, the story is my constituents and

:16:18.:16:19.

others tell me are familiar to anyone who has practised as a lawyer

:16:20.:16:21.

and product liability litig`tion. From thalidomide tip Primodos, to

:16:22.:16:23.

vaccine damage, there are common themes. Lack of warnings about

:16:24.:16:25.

special effects, being calldd a fussy mother when the disabhlities

:16:26.:16:28.

of a young baby first noticdd and raised with medical practithoners.

:16:29.:16:30.

Denial of causality when thdre are reports of adverse effects. The

:16:31.:16:34.

sudden and explicable loss of medical records that indicated what

:16:35.:16:39.

was prescribed and when. Often just for the week of the month, H've come

:16:40.:16:43.

across it very many times in litigation. Over at hostility and

:16:44.:16:49.

lack of transparency when doubts are expressed. Even after withdrawal of

:16:50.:16:58.

the product in question, no acceptance of liability by the drug

:16:59.:17:00.

company, by regulatory agencies by the prescriber. A legal battle, as

:17:01.:17:03.

also happened in this case, usually with gross inequality of arls. With

:17:04.:17:05.

those that felt utterly unwhlling to concede any kind of liability or

:17:06.:17:11.

causation or to cooperate at all with finding some way through the

:17:12.:17:18.

difficulties that the victils and those who go on and suffer for many

:17:19.:17:21.

years have to face. The consequences were always the same, Madam Deputy

:17:22.:17:25.

Speaker, years of denial and agony for those affected, and consequence

:17:26.:17:35.

failure to help alleviate the consequences or understand the

:17:36.:17:37.

motives of the people who come forward. Agony for parents who

:17:38.:17:39.

invariably blame themselves for what has happened to their children.

:17:40.:17:42.

Particularly in a case like this, where there was no therapeutic

:17:43.:17:48.

reason for taking this drug. Extremely long, frustrating, often

:17:49.:17:52.

fruitless campaigns for truth and justice, often including fahled

:17:53.:18:02.

litigation, as in this case, which usually fails on the basis of

:18:03.:18:04.

causation. Or effectively bdcause there is no real cooperation, no

:18:05.:18:07.

willingness to find the truth, just a defensive attitude from mddical

:18:08.:18:10.

authorities, scientists, and often, I hesitate as it, but from

:18:11.:18:13.

government. That is what I see going on here.

:18:14.:18:18.

I think there is little doubt that hormonal pregnancy tests catsed the

:18:19.:18:28.

birth defects which many falilies complained. There was significant

:18:29.:18:31.

disquiet from the 1960s that there were adverse effects which led to

:18:32.:18:35.

the kind of disabilities whhch Louise and Sonya now live whth.

:18:36.:18:40.

Obviously, proving causation in individual cases is difficult,

:18:41.:18:43.

particularly when medical rdcords have gone missing, but why should

:18:44.:18:48.

these families have to provd that? Drugs using such hormones in such

:18:49.:18:52.

doses were banned elsewhere. The fact that existing drugs usd these

:18:53.:18:56.

hormones in much smaller doses does not mean the large dose versions

:18:57.:19:00.

could not cause the kind of problems that we're looking at here.

:19:01.:19:07.

Survivors such as Louise and Sonya have significant and ongoing health

:19:08.:19:10.

problems and their families deserve the truth about what happendd, in

:19:11.:19:14.

addition to getting the further help and assistance that they nedd. We

:19:15.:19:18.

have this so-called independent review established by the Government

:19:19.:19:22.

in October 2014 and can I s`y that I think the Government were rhght to

:19:23.:19:27.

establish it. However, it does not seem to be going well. I am not sure

:19:28.:19:32.

that it has the confidence of the families. I am not sure that it has

:19:33.:19:35.

the confidence of those who have been fighting for so long to get to

:19:36.:19:38.

the bottom of what happened. There seems to be a failure to work with

:19:39.:19:42.

the families affected by thhs scandal. I have seen independent

:19:43.:19:47.

reviews that work. The Hillsborough Independent panel springs to mind

:19:48.:19:51.

and I have had a long assochation with that campaign and I know what

:19:52.:19:55.

works and what doesn't. Inddpendent panels that work are not based on

:19:56.:20:01.

expecting campaigners to sign confidentiality agreements before

:20:02.:20:03.

they can even observe proceddings, they are not based on appointing

:20:04.:20:09.

experts which are suspected by some families, rightly or wronglx to have

:20:10.:20:13.

a conflict of interest, thex are not based on some proceedings bding so

:20:14.:20:16.

slow and opaque with so little information coming out that those

:20:17.:20:19.

affected become suspicious or don't know what is going on behind the

:20:20.:20:24.

closed doors of their review. They are based on proper consult`tion,

:20:25.:20:28.

obtaining full confidence from those affected. If this doesn't h`ppen, in

:20:29.:20:32.

the end, no matter what the result is, it will make matters worse. It

:20:33.:20:37.

will make the affected families feel there has been another establishment

:20:38.:20:43.

whitewash and their hopes h`ve been raised in order to be dashed and

:20:44.:20:47.

things have been swept under the carpet and the authorities, whoever

:20:48.:20:51.

they are, don't really want to find out what happened because it is

:20:52.:20:55.

inconvenient. And I think the Government minister must now, in

:20:56.:20:59.

view of this debate, in view of the concerns that many of these families

:21:00.:21:03.

are expressing get a grip of this process and make sure that ht works.

:21:04.:21:09.

He must take some steps to obtain the confidence of the familhes, to

:21:10.:21:14.

be much more transparent about what is going on, to have a propdr

:21:15.:21:21.

understanding of what it is sought to achieve through this process

:21:22.:21:27.

because if there is another whitewash, if this review doesn t

:21:28.:21:31.

work, these families and thdir members of Parliament, whether it is

:21:32.:21:38.

asked for our successes, we will not go away. We will be coming back to

:21:39.:21:42.

the Minister, we will be coling back to the Government and we will make

:21:43.:21:48.

sure that our constituents, those families get the truth, get the

:21:49.:21:52.

information and get the acknowledgement and help th`t they

:21:53.:21:56.

deserve. Thank you, Madam Deputy Spe`ker It

:21:57.:22:03.

was fantastic to hear that compelling speech by my honourable

:22:04.:22:08.

friend. I think a theme this developing here. One thing we have

:22:09.:22:13.

learned in this country timd and time again, from many public

:22:14.:22:18.

enquiries into various issuds is the need to ensure that the victims of

:22:19.:22:25.

injustice, survivors and thdir families, in whatever format, have

:22:26.:22:28.

the opportunity to have thehr say in as transparent and open way as

:22:29.:22:32.

possible, with no red glittdry industry cosying up. -- regtlatory

:22:33.:22:40.

industry. The other thing is the need to bend over backwards to go

:22:41.:22:44.

the extra mile to assure thd victims of those speaking on their behalf

:22:45.:22:48.

have full confidence in the mechanism setup to seek out the

:22:49.:22:52.

truth of what may have occurred How many times in this country have we

:22:53.:22:57.

failed to investigate matters properly, only to have to rdvisit

:22:58.:23:01.

the issue and then conclude that those who sought justice were right

:23:02.:23:09.

in the first place? It is as if a blanket is drawn over a difficult

:23:10.:23:16.

and challenging issue to prdvaricate and procrastinate until those

:23:17.:23:20.

affected by the initial isste are worn out, worn down or die.

:23:21.:23:26.

Institutions live on, peopld died. It is a cynical game of cat and

:23:27.:23:30.

mouse with the victims being the mouse, but is often a mouse that

:23:31.:23:36.

Ross. And in this case it draws no cover-up. After all the miscarriages

:23:37.:23:42.

of justice which have occurred over the years in this country, do we

:23:43.:23:45.

really need to drag institutions and organisations kicking into the light

:23:46.:23:49.

of examination, how has it come to that with the experience we have had

:23:50.:23:54.

in this country? Have we le`rned no lessons from our own historx in this

:23:55.:23:59.

given all the enquiries we have had? Are institutions so arrogant they

:24:00.:24:03.

feel they are immune to the democratic process, to scrutiny to

:24:04.:24:07.

accountability? What does it come to when this House has to conshder such

:24:08.:24:13.

a motion by my honourable friend, the member for Bolton South East, we

:24:14.:24:17.

shouldn't have to do it. We should not have to do this today. @t this

:24:18.:24:23.

stage, I must say what a relarkable job she has done for those people

:24:24.:24:28.

affected by this scandal, bdcause that is what it is, pure and simple,

:24:29.:24:34.

a scandal. She has been ten`cious in pursuing this issue on the half of

:24:35.:24:37.

those people, the families `ffected by this sorry tale of incompetence,

:24:38.:24:45.

the deficiency and lack of will to put this matter to the test and in

:24:46.:24:50.

her, they have a doughty ch`mpion. My honourable friend has lahd out

:24:51.:24:53.

the inadequacies of the process so far and I do not want to repeat for

:24:54.:24:58.

a sake of repeating what thdy have already said. They could not have

:24:59.:25:03.

been any clearer, it could not have been any more forensic or p`ssionate

:25:04.:25:06.

what they have had to say. The member for Livingston, make a field,

:25:07.:25:13.

Stalybridge and hide. Howevdr, I will make two points in closing

:25:14.:25:18.

First is my continued support for the honourable member for Bolton

:25:19.:25:24.

East and the families, some of whom are my constituents. I am grateful

:25:25.:25:28.

for the work done on their behalf so far. There is not time for subtlety

:25:29.:25:33.

in this particular one. So secondly, if the people in the institttions

:25:34.:25:35.

who have been given the task of getting to the bottom of thhs issue,

:25:36.:25:39.

paid for by the taxpayer and yes, the families here today, if they are

:25:40.:25:45.

not prepared to fulfil that task to the full satisfaction of thd

:25:46.:25:48.

families and the thousands of people who are affected by this, n`mely the

:25:49.:25:53.

victims, I say move aside and let others get on who want to expose the

:25:54.:25:59.

inadequacies of the system that has left these people are dressdd for

:26:00.:26:04.

decades. Let others, if necdssary, get on with the job. Enough is

:26:05.:26:09.

enough, Madam Deputy Speaker. I hope and trust that the Minister will

:26:10.:26:13.

hear the just and reasonabld pleas of our constituents, take this

:26:14.:26:17.

motion away and put it into affect both to the letter and in its

:26:18.:26:24.

spirit. It has gone on for 40 years, it is really time to draw a line in

:26:25.:26:31.

the sand from this injusticd, to give closure and peace to the

:26:32.:26:37.

victims and families. Madam Deputy Speaker, anything less would be

:26:38.:26:42.

betrayal of both our duty and a betrayal of our constituents.

:26:43.:26:50.

First of all, I would like to thank the honourable member for Bolton

:26:51.:26:52.

South East, for bringing thhs debate to the Chamber, and also, I would

:26:53.:26:58.

like to congratulate her for her work on taking up this mattdr and

:26:59.:27:02.

her continued pressure on the Government and her persistence,

:27:03.:27:08.

pressurising the Government to agree to hold an enquiry, and now to make

:27:09.:27:15.

sure they are held accountable on that promise. Also wish to speak out

:27:16.:27:20.

in support and admiration for the campaigners, particularly M`rie

:27:21.:27:26.

Lyon, whom it has been my pleasure to meet over the last coupld of

:27:27.:27:32.

years. He campaigners have pursued justice on this issue over the

:27:33.:27:37.

decades, to have their voicds heard and their questions answered. They

:27:38.:27:42.

have shown resilience and fortitude in their search for clarification on

:27:43.:27:48.

the possible association between the proscription of hormone pregnancy

:27:49.:27:52.

tests cause in adverse effects in pregnancy and subsequent birth

:27:53.:27:58.

defects in their children. @nd my predecessor in Hayward and

:27:59.:28:02.

Middleton, Jean Dobbin, was working with constituents, trying to get

:28:03.:28:07.

some answers to their strongly held beliefs that the proscription of

:28:08.:28:10.

hormone pregnancy tests had led to birth defects in their children

:28:11.:28:16.

After Jim's sad death in 2004, I have carried on his work and no one

:28:17.:28:23.

was more pleased than me whdn finally in 2015, 40 years on since

:28:24.:28:28.

hormone pregnancy tests werd banned, an independent enquiry was finally

:28:29.:28:34.

setup. The families and children, the campaigning group, the

:28:35.:28:38.

Association of ordering dam`ged by hormone pregnancy tests would

:28:39.:28:41.

finally receive the answer hs that they had sought for so long. And it

:28:42.:28:48.

is interesting to just take time to consider why hormone pregnancy tests

:28:49.:28:52.

were banned in 1975 will stop it was following advice from the former

:28:53.:28:58.

Committee on the Safety of Ledicines that these hormonal preparations

:28:59.:29:02.

should not be used as a pregnancy test, that a warning about `

:29:03.:29:07.

possible hazard in pregnancx should be inserted in all promotional

:29:08.:29:11.

literature. Just consider that, this was a pregnancy test and a warning

:29:12.:29:15.

should be inserted that thex should not be used in pregnancy. The

:29:16.:29:21.

Committee on the Safety of Ledicines wanted a clear statement th`t

:29:22.:29:24.

pregnant women should not use these products. Clearly, that had been

:29:25.:29:30.

sufficient adverse reactions reported for the Committee on the

:29:31.:29:34.

Safety of Medicines to reach these conclusions. But I can remelber last

:29:35.:29:38.

year when the enquiry was fhnally agreed to how jubilant we fdlt, that

:29:39.:29:44.

finally, the evidence would be examined, causal relationshhps would

:29:45.:29:50.

be analysed, maybe even an explanation for the medical notes

:29:51.:29:54.

which had mysteriously gone missing would be achieved. Finally, we felt

:29:55.:29:58.

we had achieved something, we felt we would get answers to the

:29:59.:30:02.

questions that have tormentdd affected families for decadds. The

:30:03.:30:07.

Government has promised in good faith that the enquiry would be

:30:08.:30:10.

transparent and would be in good time. But disappointingly, the

:30:11.:30:20.

enquiry has delivered neithdr on transparency or timeliness so far.

:30:21.:30:24.

And questions need to be answered. Why did it take over easier to set

:30:25.:30:28.

up the expert working group? Why has the working group only met three

:30:29.:30:32.

times? And at what stage is the enquiry at now? We have no hdea

:30:33.:30:39.

Reassurances and clarity must now be given by the Government. Thd expert

:30:40.:30:45.

working group has also to bd more accountable and more open to

:30:46.:30:49.

scrutiny. It has to engage `nd work with the Association of shotlder and

:30:50.:30:54.

damaged by hormone pregnancx tests, to address their concerns as to the

:30:55.:30:59.

current progress or lack of it in the enquiry process. And thd key

:31:00.:31:02.

concern, which has been voiced by many members which is the expert

:31:03.:31:09.

working group have also signed a confidentiality clause which many

:31:10.:31:11.

feel compromises the possibhlity of a fairer and a just outcome. The

:31:12.:31:18.

former minister for life schences set out quite clearly to thd

:31:19.:31:23.

families that his government would establish a means for closure and

:31:24.:31:28.

justice, while alleviating their fears that past failings wotld be

:31:29.:31:34.

investigated. The delays and deliberations of following through

:31:35.:31:37.

on these promises should now be over. The Government should now give

:31:38.:31:41.

answers and make sure it delivers on that deal to the thousands of

:31:42.:31:50.

families affected. Thank yot. Thank you, Madam Deputy Spe`ker

:31:51.:31:54.

Thank you for the opportunity to speak in this debate today on this

:31:55.:32:01.

ever stating lease sad topic and to thank the Backbench Business

:32:02.:32:03.

Committee, also the member for Bolton South East for securhng the

:32:04.:32:13.

debate today. -- to speak on this debate today on this devast`tingly

:32:14.:32:23.

sad topic. I also want to p`y tribute to Marie Lyon and the

:32:24.:32:28.

hormone pregnancy test camp`ign on telling their own stories,

:32:29.:32:31.

particularly in the case of Marie, telling the story of her datghter in

:32:32.:32:35.

the media. There is much th`t we take for granted today with the

:32:36.:32:39.

improvements in health care and the use of pregnancy tests todax. This

:32:40.:32:50.

sheds a very important light on what happened 40 years ago and m`ke it a

:32:51.:32:54.

real matter of great sadness and shame that it has happened hn our

:32:55.:33:00.

country. Many of the tributds, the stories that we have heard today

:33:01.:33:04.

show that so many are living with the consequences, and that we must

:33:05.:33:10.

learn the lessons. This enqtiry and our confidence in its findings is

:33:11.:33:15.

critical, not only to close this chapter of our history, but also to

:33:16.:33:19.

make sure that lessons are learned, and there are clear findings that

:33:20.:33:24.

will be adhered to in the ftture when it comes to regulation and the

:33:25.:33:28.

description of how medications should be used.

:33:29.:33:32.

When I first came to hear of this issue I found it very hard to

:33:33.:33:42.

comprehend why it seems to have taken so long for those who were

:33:43.:33:44.

prescribed Primodos to get the clarity and the answers for what

:33:45.:33:56.

happened to them, for this hssue to be comprehensively and independently

:33:57.:33:58.

researched, and for an expl`nation to be given as to why the drug

:33:59.:34:00.

continued to be used after concerns were raised, and for there to be an

:34:01.:34:03.

apology and justice for famhlies affected. Madam Deputy Speaker

:34:04.:34:09.

studies in the UK and elsewhere from the late 1960s to the early 70s

:34:10.:34:13.

suggested a link between thd use of hormone pregnancy tests and the

:34:14.:34:22.

range of abnormalities that were then caused, including cleft lip,

:34:23.:34:27.

limb reduction, and heart abnormality. Beth and Dixon from my

:34:28.:34:32.

constituency was affected after her mother took the drug. And I want to

:34:33.:34:36.

thank her for having the cotrage to comment me be about this

:34:37.:34:47.

issue and for giving me perlission to share her story with the house.

:34:48.:34:51.

She says, my name is Beth and Dixon. I'm 48 years old and work as an

:34:52.:34:54.

occupational therapist in wdst London. I was born in 1968 hn south

:34:55.:34:57.

Wales with heart and limb ddfects that have impacted on my entire

:34:58.:35:01.

life. My mother was given Primodos, and oral pregnancy test, by her

:35:02.:35:07.

doctor. I believe that is the cause of these physical defects. @long

:35:08.:35:12.

with members of the Association for children damaged by hormone

:35:13.:35:17.

pregnancy tests, and supporting the inquiry into how this damaghng drug

:35:18.:35:19.

could have been prescribed to mothers when there were alrdady

:35:20.:35:33.

worries about its safety. She says, I feel it's important accountability

:35:34.:35:36.

is accepted by the drug company who put profit before patient s`fety.

:35:37.:35:38.

And for the government to acknowledge its responsibilhty for

:35:39.:35:40.

not ensuring citizens of thhs country were protected from harm.

:35:41.:35:42.

She says, I was born with a heart murmur and fully formed bonds in my

:35:43.:35:47.

feet. I experience shortage of breath as a child, slept poorly as a

:35:48.:35:50.

baby, and was restricted and sporting activities. The he`rt

:35:51.:35:57.

murmur did not require surghcal intervention but I have frepuent and

:35:58.:36:02.

regular visits to cardiologhsts She says, I suspect many associ`tion

:36:03.:36:09.

members can relate to waiting to see the doctor in hospital in the 7 s

:36:10.:36:12.

and 80s, and knowing where xou are in the queue because you can see the

:36:13.:36:18.

thickest medical record in the stack, and knowing it's yours.

:36:19.:36:20.

Thankfully the introduction of electronic medical records leans I

:36:21.:36:23.

don't suffer that particular humiliation any more. The ddfects in

:36:24.:36:30.

the bones of my toes became more obvious as I grew. From my darliest

:36:31.:36:35.

memories, around six years old, I can remember pain in both fdet that

:36:36.:36:40.

prevented me from participating fully in activities at school. When

:36:41.:36:46.

I was nine years old, the orthopaedic surgeon in the local

:36:47.:36:52.

spittle recommended surgery to address the deformed joints. He felt

:36:53.:37:00.

although I was still growing, the pain I was experiencing needed to be

:37:01.:37:02.

addressed sooner. I had my first orthopaedic surgery in 1980. The

:37:03.:37:08.

problems have persisted and I have required six further surgic`l

:37:09.:37:13.

interventions since then. The pain today varies depending on the

:37:14.:37:23.

activity. Prolonged standing or walking is painful. I've bedn

:37:24.:37:25.

fortunate to have excellent health care in South Wales and West London

:37:26.:37:27.

to address my physical impahrments. I'm lucky enough to have loving

:37:28.:37:30.

parents and a husband, who has given me the care and strength to support

:37:31.:37:37.

them and deal with the emothonal strain of the ongoing difficulties.

:37:38.:37:50.

She goes on to say, I've bedn given a full life, I've been able to live

:37:51.:37:53.

a full life, going to university, working full-time, making a

:37:54.:37:55.

contribution to society in ly capacity as occupational thdrapist.

:37:56.:37:57.

But every day at work I meet people with disability and physical or

:37:58.:38:01.

cognitive impairments. But nothing prepared me for my first medting

:38:02.:38:04.

with other association membdrs in June 20 14. She says, the sdverity

:38:05.:38:12.

of impairments in some of mx contemporaries, both shocked and

:38:13.:38:17.

angered me. Some have profotnd disabilities that have prevdnted

:38:18.:38:21.

them from living a full lifd, and left them dependent on carers and

:38:22.:38:26.

their families for care and support. This could have been avoided with

:38:27.:38:32.

responsible oversight of thd drugs being given to expectant mothers and

:38:33.:38:36.

more robust testing of the drugs before they were brought to market

:38:37.:38:43.

here and across the world. She says, be sure I met with other association

:38:44.:38:45.

members, I felt guilty that their suffering was so much worse than

:38:46.:38:54.

mine. Then I felt guilty I was relieved at that. My mother, along

:38:55.:38:57.

with the mothers of many melbers, felt guilty that she took a tablet

:38:58.:39:01.

that caused these lifelong problems for their children. And, of course,

:39:02.:39:08.

she says, logically I understand the guilt does not lie with me or my

:39:09.:39:14.

mother, but in the absence of any form of apology or recognithon of

:39:15.:39:19.

wrongdoing by the drug comp`ny or government. We do not have closure

:39:20.:39:23.

or confidence that this won't happen again. I will give way. I thank the

:39:24.:39:36.

Honourable lady for giving way, she makes an absolutely crucial point

:39:37.:39:38.

that until families have answers they cannot deal with the trauma and

:39:39.:39:41.

they cannot get the proper counselling and support thex

:39:42.:39:43.

deserve. Seema Malhotra. I thank the honourable member for her

:39:44.:39:45.

intervention. Certainly that is the reason why Beth and Dixon h`s

:39:46.:39:52.

written to me and says she supports the inquiry to establish thd facts

:39:53.:39:55.

and explain to the country, to understand how this could h`ve

:39:56.:40:01.

happened, such a short whild after the thalidomide scandal. Madam

:40:02.:40:07.

Deputy Speaker, Bethan's story highlights the issues around how

:40:08.:40:11.

this drug was described, and the effect it still has to this day

:40:12.:40:18.

I've been struck, as well, by the work of Marie and her campahgn.

:40:19.:40:24.

Their patients, their systelatic and honest work. Working in partnership,

:40:25.:40:33.

desiring to work in partnership simply for answers for justhce, and

:40:34.:40:35.

to make sure everything is done so that this does not happen again But

:40:36.:40:39.

I am concerned, Madam Deputx Speaker, that they are not being met

:40:40.:40:45.

halfway by an inquiry that does not appear to have had effectivd

:40:46.:40:50.

government governance. Wherd there are concerns from the panel, the

:40:51.:40:55.

robustness of the procedures, the approach to evidence being

:40:56.:40:59.

collected, and how it is behng analysed. I want to close mx

:41:00.:41:13.

contribution with some questions to the minister, and some commhtments I

:41:14.:41:16.

would like to hear being made today. Madam Deputy 's bigger, I bdlieve it

:41:17.:41:19.

is time to make sure there hs commitment today to respond to the

:41:20.:41:26.

issues raised. To do so forlally, in writing to the member who c`lled

:41:27.:41:29.

this debate. To reconfirm the status of the inquiry. Its terms of

:41:30.:41:32.

reference. And its timetabld for delivery. And how quality whll be

:41:33.:41:37.

ensured. To explain what action is being taken to address the concerns

:41:38.:41:45.

raised by honourable members today. And to have a commitment on public

:41:46.:41:49.

record that ministers will see through their commitment on this

:41:50.:41:52.

inquiry to a report and findings that will command the confidence of

:41:53.:41:57.

this house. And, indeed, of the families and victims who have waited

:41:58.:42:02.

so long for those answers and for justice. Emma Reynolds. Thank you

:42:03.:42:08.

Madam Deputy Speaker. I would like to first pay tribute to my

:42:09.:42:10.

honourable friend for Bolton South East for securing this debate and

:42:11.:42:20.

for championing the concerns of the families affected by hormond

:42:21.:42:22.

pregnancy tests in Parliament. I'd also like to pay tribute to the

:42:23.:42:25.

families, all of those families that for years have been involved in the

:42:26.:42:29.

Association for children dalaged by hormone pregnancy testing. One such

:42:30.:42:36.

family lives in my constitudncy Stephen Bunting is a constituent of

:42:37.:42:41.

mine. Early on during his mother Pat's pregnancy, she went to see the

:42:42.:42:50.

GP to see if she was pregnant. She was given Primodos. Like anx of us,

:42:51.:42:53.

she trusted her doctor. And her doctor, in turn, trusted thd advice

:42:54.:43:01.

that he had been given. It was only months later when Stephen w`s born,

:43:02.:43:07.

in 1967, his parents discovdred he was severely brain-damaged. That he

:43:08.:43:11.

would suffer from a severe form of epilepsy all of his life, which

:43:12.:43:16.

would get worse with age. And that he would suffer from daily seizures,

:43:17.:43:20.

very often in the middle of the night. I've met Stephen, he came to

:43:21.:43:26.

my surgery with his parents. He requires 24 hour care. His parents,

:43:27.:43:33.

now in their mid and late 70s have cared for him all of his life and

:43:34.:43:38.

they love him just as they love their two healthy daughters. But

:43:39.:43:42.

they struggle to find respite because of the severity of his

:43:43.:43:49.

seizures. It was only years later the family discovered the mddication

:43:50.:44:02.

Pat had been given was equivalent of 40 contraceptive pills in one

:44:03.:44:05.

dosage. You don't have to bd a medical professional for th`t to

:44:06.:44:13.

ring alarm bells. It became apparent research had been carried ott as

:44:14.:44:16.

early as the 1960s and into the 1970s. That had warned about the

:44:17.:44:21.

lethal, and in some cases, toxic impact of these drugs. Indedd, in

:44:22.:44:28.

1975 GPs were sent advice not to prescribe this drug any mord. It

:44:29.:44:34.

took several more years before the drug was withdrawn from the market.

:44:35.:44:38.

Research suggests it's likely many women who took this medicathon

:44:39.:44:44.

suffered miscarriage or stillbirth. Those babies who survived this toxic

:44:45.:44:50.

medication were severely affected by abnormalities or disabilitids. I was

:44:51.:44:57.

pleased to learn, as was thd family, that the minister's predecessor

:44:58.:45:02.

agreed to the establishment of this inquiry. However, as the Minister

:45:03.:45:05.

has heard, from all the spe`kers in this debate, the families do have

:45:06.:45:14.

serious, deep and genuine concerns, and it is my understanding they do

:45:15.:45:19.

not have confidence in this inquiry. I will... I thank the honourable

:45:20.:45:24.

lady for giving way and I would like to put on the record my thanks to

:45:25.:45:33.

Steven's family come includhng Charlotte, who lives in West End, in

:45:34.:45:36.

my constituency, who came to see me to thank the APPG for the work they

:45:37.:45:41.

have done on this. And to explain how her care carries on for Stephen,

:45:42.:45:49.

as her parents advance with age I thank her for that intervention

:45:50.:45:55.

Charlotte has been a tireless campaigner for trying to get to the

:45:56.:45:58.

bottom of the truth of what happened in the 1960s and 1970s. I hope the

:45:59.:46:03.

Minister when he winds up whll answer a number of questions about

:46:04.:46:08.

the inquiry. We want him, as my right honourable friend said, to get

:46:09.:46:13.

a grip on this inquiry. Will he guarantee all the relevant dvidence

:46:14.:46:21.

is put before the inquiry? Because as the honourable lady for

:46:22.:46:25.

Livingstone has suggested, there is great concern the evidence hs being

:46:26.:46:30.

cherry picked. Will he guar`ntee this inquiry is independent, full

:46:31.:46:39.

and transparent? And will hd make a commitment today to this hotse and

:46:40.:46:41.

to the families here present, that he will undertake to do everything

:46:42.:46:44.

in his power that this inquhry will get to the bottom of what h`ppened?

:46:45.:46:49.

Why evidence in the 1960s about the harmful and indeed it devastating

:46:50.:47:00.

impact of this drug was ignored for so long? Why it continued to be

:47:01.:47:03.

prescribed. Why it seemed there was a medical cover-up. Why it took so

:47:04.:47:06.

long to be banned. And what was behind is the continuous regulatory

:47:07.:47:16.

failure. The family I represent like any other family, though they

:47:17.:47:19.

might not admit to this, wotld of course like more help to care for

:47:20.:47:22.

Stephen. But they are not driven by a desire for compensation. They are

:47:23.:47:25.

driven by a long and angry search for truth and justice. And they

:47:26.:47:33.

don't want a whitewash, thex want to have confidence in this inqtiry

:47:34.:47:37.

Though regrettably they do not. I would urge the Minister tod`y to

:47:38.:47:46.

ensure they get the truth and Justice, surely they deservd nothing

:47:47.:47:47.

less. Jacob Rees-Mogg. Along with other members I want to

:47:48.:47:57.

pay tribute to the member for Bolton South East who has run a terrific

:47:58.:48:01.

campaign on this issue, has been tireless on it, has set up the APGG

:48:02.:48:10.

and has raised a concern whhch ought to be central to the Governlent I

:48:11.:48:17.

want to focus on the enquirx and the need to establish faith with the

:48:18.:48:20.

families who have been involved with what has happened in relation to

:48:21.:48:25.

Primodos. It seems to me th`t there is a strong primer face the case

:48:26.:48:29.

that something was wrong with this drug and it was known to thd

:48:30.:48:35.

authorities and they have f`iled to act on it for an extended pdriod. If

:48:36.:48:40.

you look at the evidence it was first warned about on the 10th of

:48:41.:48:45.

July in 1967 and the adversd reaction committee felt there was

:48:46.:48:48.

concern for further investigation, and yet it was eight years later in

:48:49.:48:54.

1975 when Primodos was said not to be proscribed for people who were

:48:55.:48:59.

pregnant. This seems to me to be so irresponsible when the risks of

:49:00.:49:02.

prescribing drugs to pregnant women are so particularly high. And this

:49:03.:49:09.

comes as the investigation `nd enquiry is taking place. Governments

:49:10.:49:15.

are amazingly good at apologising for things which happened so long

:49:16.:49:19.

ago that nothing could be done about it. I seem to remember that one

:49:20.:49:24.

government apologised for the Irish potato famine 150 years aftdr it

:49:25.:49:27.

happened but that does no good to anybody. What governments nded to do

:49:28.:49:32.

is apologise for things while people are still alive. But when they

:49:33.:49:38.

haven't acted, when time has gone by, the onus of proof shifts to

:49:39.:49:42.

them, that it is for governlents at that point to show how well they are

:49:43.:49:46.

behaving and how properly they are going through the process. Ht is for

:49:47.:49:52.

them to rebuild the trust whth the families, not for the familhes to

:49:53.:49:56.

accept guarantees from the Government without any depth to

:49:57.:49:59.

them. And therefore, with the appointments to this enquirx, with

:50:00.:50:05.

the information being made `vailable to it, with the investigations that

:50:06.:50:09.

are taking place, the Government has a long way to go to re-establish a

:50:10.:50:15.

trust which was lost probably as long ago as 1975. It is in that

:50:16.:50:18.

context that I hope the Minhster will respond to make it cle`r that

:50:19.:50:24.

the Government understands the strength of the case that h`s been

:50:25.:50:28.

made, will be looking at it with a genuinely open mind, and will see

:50:29.:50:33.

the sense that not that things can be put right but will be making some

:50:34.:50:38.

amelioration if it was found in the end that there was fault in what the

:50:39.:50:41.

Government did, what the regulator did and of course what the drug

:50:42.:50:45.

company did, and there are so many bits and pieces that cause

:50:46.:50:53.

suspicion. The disappearancd of records is a particularly ilportant

:50:54.:50:58.

one. Where did these records go to? As the honourable lady for Bolton

:50:59.:51:01.

South East mention, a lot of the information being in German and

:51:02.:51:05.

whether it is even being tr`nslated for the committee. And when the sort

:51:06.:51:10.

of issues hangover and enquhry, the Government has a lot of work to do

:51:11.:51:14.

it to re-establish trust so that members of this House and wore

:51:15.:51:17.

importantly the people affected can believe that the enquiry is fair. So

:51:18.:51:23.

I once again congratulate the honourable lady for what shd has

:51:24.:51:26.

done. I don't want to go into specific cases because I thhnk those

:51:27.:51:31.

will be judged by the enquiry, that it will be a proper process to

:51:32.:51:36.

investigate whether the evidence is there on a widespread scale. But

:51:37.:51:44.

with such a strong base casd that we already know, then we must have an

:51:45.:51:50.

enquiry that people can trust. Justin Maddox. Thank you, M`dam

:51:51.:51:55.

Deputy Speaker. Can my first congratulate the member for Bolton

:51:56.:51:59.

South East and Livingston for securing this debate and I welcome

:52:00.:52:02.

the well-informed and passionate debates we have heard from `cross

:52:03.:52:07.

the House. I would also likd to pay tribute to Marie Lyon who h`s never

:52:08.:52:13.

given up in her fight to ensure that parents like her get to the bottom

:52:14.:52:16.

of what has happened to thehr Georgian and why. I would also like

:52:17.:52:25.

to pay tribute to the all p`rty Parliamentary group ably ch`ired by

:52:26.:52:29.

the member for Bolton South East. It was there campaigning which has led

:52:30.:52:37.

to the work being setup which is the discussion today. Clearly, there are

:52:38.:52:41.

very serious concerns about this process which do need to be

:52:42.:52:45.

addressed. I think we should welcome the fact that the former Minister

:52:46.:52:49.

for life sciences sought to set up an enquiry and unfortunatelx there

:52:50.:52:54.

appears to be a divergence between the source type of process the

:52:55.:52:59.

minister sought to establish and the way the process is currentlx

:53:00.:53:03.

operating. As we have heard today hundreds of families have bden

:53:04.:53:05.

affected by this issue and have suffered not only debilitathng

:53:06.:53:15.

conditions and premature de`th. They have suffered a sense of injustice

:53:16.:53:20.

and the pain of 40 years of questions left unanswered. Ly

:53:21.:53:23.

honourable friend for Bolton South East made a central point about

:53:24.:53:28.

where we go now which was that victims should be at the he`rt of

:53:29.:53:32.

this process. The testimony that she gave on the half of the victims

:53:33.:53:35.

clearly showed that that is not happening at the moment. My

:53:36.:53:40.

honourable friend, the membdr for make a field spoke about her

:53:41.:53:44.

constituents Marie Lyon who is on the panel and she gave a spdcific

:53:45.:53:48.

example of her being requirdd to read 36 files in two weeks that she

:53:49.:53:53.

cannot talk to anyone about, which is clearly a painterly absurd way to

:53:54.:53:59.

go about business. The honotrable member for Livingston spoke

:54:00.:54:03.

forcefully about her legitilate concerns about the impartiality of

:54:04.:54:09.

the working group and the l`ck of any substantive response whdn those

:54:10.:54:13.

concerns were raised. We also heard from other honourable members and a

:54:14.:54:24.

particularly powerful speech. Time prevents me from going into too much

:54:25.:54:28.

detail about what those honourable members contributions were but they

:54:29.:54:32.

spoke passionately on behalf of their constituents and clearly

:54:33.:54:35.

identified the issues that we need to address with the current process.

:54:36.:54:41.

Madam Deputy Speaker, as we know, from the late 1960s warnings began

:54:42.:54:52.

to emerge for the drug Primodos including birth defects and

:54:53.:54:55.

miscarriage and it was finally decided that Primodos should not be

:54:56.:55:05.

used as a hormone pregnancy test. Primodos continued to be provided

:55:06.:55:08.

for women until its withdrawal from the market by Schering in 1878. In

:55:09.:55:16.

1977 there were unbelievablx 70 3 prescriptions of Primodos to

:55:17.:55:20.

pregnant women and that is the crux of this issue, the delays of

:55:21.:55:23.

warnings are merging and anx action being taken to stop this drtg being

:55:24.:55:28.

offered to women. We no steps were taken in Sweden, Germany, Fhnland,

:55:29.:55:35.

the USA, Australia and Irel`nd up to five years before any warnings were

:55:36.:55:38.

issued in the UK. That led to thousands of women taking the drug.

:55:39.:55:46.

It is a scandal that familids are still waiting for answers about why

:55:47.:55:49.

that was allowed to happen `nd there is a duty on all of us to m`ke sure

:55:50.:55:54.

that is put right. When this issue was last abated in October 2014 the

:55:55.:56:02.

families were very pleased with the former minister for life schences

:56:03.:56:04.

agreed to set up an independent panel enquiry and he also committed

:56:05.:56:07.

to the release of all inforlation that is held by the Departmdnt. The

:56:08.:56:11.

also promised the committee would comprise of independent members and

:56:12.:56:15.

they would assure the assochation is properly represented and has a

:56:16.:56:19.

chance to give evidence. Finally, he stated he wanted to shed light on

:56:20.:56:23.

the issue and bring an important closure in an era of transp`rency so

:56:24.:56:27.

lessons can be learned and this never happens again. Madam Deputy

:56:28.:56:31.

Speaker, we welcome the establishment of that process and

:56:32.:56:34.

the assurances offered by the minister at that time. However, as

:56:35.:56:39.

we heard today, there is now a gaping chasm between those

:56:40.:56:43.

assurances and the process which is currently ongoing. I hope following

:56:44.:56:46.

this debate the Minister will take urgent steps to ensure that the

:56:47.:56:50.

families who have been throtgh so much can regain confidence hn this

:56:51.:56:55.

process. In terms of independence, we have heard the selection process

:56:56.:57:00.

of members of the panel can best be described as opaque, and serious

:57:01.:57:08.

concerns have been raised about conflicts of interest. Can the

:57:09.:57:12.

Minister say he is absolutely happy around the independence of the

:57:13.:57:16.

members of the panel? It is vital that along with the panel bding

:57:17.:57:20.

provided with every relevant piece of evidence, they also offered

:57:21.:57:24.

sufficient time to consider it. The evidence must also be presented in

:57:25.:57:28.

an accessible format as is good practice in a process of thhs

:57:29.:57:33.

nature. If the Minister sathsfied with the way information is being

:57:34.:57:36.

presented to the panel and can he confirmed that every piece of

:57:37.:57:38.

information held by the Dep`rtment has been released? In terms of the

:57:39.:57:42.

association being properly represented, as we have had just one

:57:43.:57:48.

member of the association is entitled to attend meetings as an

:57:49.:57:52.

observer and they have been required to sign a confidentiality clause.

:57:53.:57:56.

That applies not only to thd discussions of the panel but also to

:57:57.:58:00.

the documents that are being presented. How in those

:58:01.:58:03.

circumstances can they raisd concerns about the process hf they

:58:04.:58:08.

are prevented from talking `bout a? Can the minister explain whx such a

:58:09.:58:13.

high level of secrecy is behng applied to a process when the

:58:14.:58:16.

original aim was to bring all important closure in an era of

:58:17.:58:20.

transparency? Justice must not only be done it must be seen to be done

:58:21.:58:24.

and there is a danger this dnquiry is failing to properly servd the

:58:25.:58:28.

people it was set up for. The Minister simply must address these

:58:29.:58:34.

issues now if the enquiry is to bring closure and for the correct

:58:35.:58:36.

lessons to be learned. Can the Minister say how some of thdse

:58:37.:58:42.

issues mean the families will not get correct answers and does he not

:58:43.:58:46.

agree that we owe them a process which is fair, transparent `nd most

:58:47.:58:51.

importantly has their trust and confidence? During the last 40 years

:58:52.:58:58.

the families have experiencdd grief, anger, a sense of injustice and in

:58:59.:59:02.

some cases guilt, but despite this, their determination has nevdr waned.

:59:03.:59:08.

I am incredibly proud that `fter 30 years Justice was finally sdrved for

:59:09.:59:15.

three of my constituents after they were tragically killed when they

:59:16.:59:18.

attended a football match. But justice was achieved after the

:59:19.:59:24.

families did not give up and the families of those children harmed or

:59:25.:59:27.

killed by hormone pregnancy tests will not give up either. Whx must

:59:28.:59:31.

the injustice they have suffered become pounded by further injustice

:59:32.:59:36.

by the sham of an enquiry which is painterly not fit for purpose?

:59:37.:59:42.

Transparency, impartiality `nd completeness are not unreasonable

:59:43.:59:46.

demands. Minister, please lhsten to the words you have heard today and

:59:47.:59:56.

act upon them. David now at. Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Can I

:59:57.:00:00.

just say at the outset that nobody in the Government has any interest

:00:01.:00:04.

other than getting to the truth of the matter and we are keen on this

:00:05.:00:08.

side of the House as the people who have spoken today and indeed the

:00:09.:00:13.

families who are watching and there is a process to be followed to make

:00:14.:00:17.

that happen. We have had strong words today. We have heard

:00:18.:00:22.

establishment whitewash. We have heard sham enquiry. We have heard a

:00:23.:00:30.

blanket over the issues. I say again, nobody on this side of the

:00:31.:00:32.

House has any interest on anything other than getting to the truth and

:00:33.:00:36.

the process that was put into place two years ago had that at its heart.

:00:37.:00:41.

Let me join others in congr`tulating first of all the member for Bolton

:00:42.:00:45.

South East and Livingston for leading the charge on this, not just

:00:46.:00:59.

today, but in terms of the @PPG It is massively important that those

:01:00.:01:03.

whose lives have been adversely affected by drugs, albeit 40 or 50

:01:04.:01:07.

years ago feel the processes have now been put into place to lake sure

:01:08.:01:11.

we can do what we can. I wotld also like to pay tribute from my side to

:01:12.:01:17.

the Association of Children damaged by Hormonal Pregnancy Tests and

:01:18.:01:24.

Marie Lyon and the work she has done and will continue to do unthl we get

:01:25.:01:30.

to the truth of this matter. I am going to talk in some detail about

:01:31.:01:34.

the progress on enquiry but it is very clear, as I listened to the

:01:35.:01:41.

debate, that there isn't confidence between the association and the work

:01:42.:01:48.

of the enquiry and that is true and I will give a commitment and I have

:01:49.:01:51.

heard about people talking `bout letters which have been an `nswered.

:01:52.:01:58.

And all that goes with that. That is an acceptable and I make thhs

:01:59.:02:01.

commitment at the start to the association or to the APPG, that one

:02:02.:02:06.

of the products that should come out of what we are talking about today,

:02:07.:02:10.

is a letter from you in as luch detail as you want it to be, raising

:02:11.:02:17.

as many concerns that you fdel you have, with the detail of enpuiry.

:02:18.:02:21.

There were a lot of detailed points made today. Having done that, I

:02:22.:02:27.

think we should have a meethng to make sure that you are contdnt with

:02:28.:02:30.

the direction of where we are going to. But I will take the

:02:31.:02:36.

intervention. I am grateful to the Minister and I'm grateful for the

:02:37.:02:39.

offer he has just made. Will he accept though that part of the

:02:40.:02:44.

problem is, if people don't have confidence in the process, hf they

:02:45.:02:48.

don't feel the process is bding conducted in a transparent way and

:02:49.:02:51.

there is evidence that that is the case, then people will say ht is

:02:52.:02:56.

likely to be a whitewash. Hd needs to provide reassurance not just to

:02:57.:03:01.

the families and to my honotrable friends, that it will be a

:03:02.:03:08.

transparent process and in those circumstances people will h`ve more

:03:09.:03:12.

confidence? I do accept that and that is why I made the offer that I

:03:13.:03:16.

just made. I guess the cave`t we have in this is that in the end

:03:17.:03:23.

science is a big part of whdre we need to get to and science finds its

:03:24.:03:27.

own path and I want to talk a little bit about how we are trying to

:03:28.:03:29.

achieve that. Two years ago the member for Mid

:03:30.:03:39.

Norfolk, the Minister for lhfe sciences as he was then, established

:03:40.:03:43.

an inquiry which at that tile was committed to an independent review

:03:44.:03:49.

of the evidence. I'm attempting to find a scientific link betwden the

:03:50.:03:55.

hormone pregnancy test in p`rticular Primodos, and the adverse effects on

:03:56.:04:00.

pregnancy and all that go whth that. It's perhaps worth saying at this

:04:01.:04:03.

point as mothers have said, this has an international issue. An hssue

:04:04.:04:10.

around for 40-50 years. We `re the only country to have set up such an

:04:11.:04:15.

inquiry and the only countrx to have attempted to find a scientific route

:04:16.:04:21.

to the truth in that way. Two years ago, I'll make some progress and

:04:22.:04:29.

come back. Two years ago thd MHS CR was charged with putting into place

:04:30.:04:34.

this inquiry, they worked whth the commission for human medicines to

:04:35.:04:37.

put into place an expert group, whose job it was to establish

:04:38.:04:44.

whether we could find a scidntific link between the drugs prescribed

:04:45.:04:50.

and the effect that took pl`ce. It took place, as I say, two ydars ago.

:04:51.:04:59.

The first meeting was a year after them, it's a long time. I apologise

:05:00.:05:02.

on behalf of the government for that, I think it's too long. I was

:05:03.:05:05.

told the election took placd, I was told there was a purdah process but

:05:06.:05:10.

it was too long. The group has met four times since then. The next

:05:11.:05:16.

meeting will be Tuesday next week. I think we can, as a group, conclude

:05:17.:05:23.

members of that inquiry will be watching our proceedings and

:05:24.:05:25.

listening to some of the pohnts being made. The focus of thd review

:05:26.:05:30.

at that time was on science, to establish whether it could be shown

:05:31.:05:37.

there was a link between thd drugs prescribed and the adverse dffects.

:05:38.:05:43.

Those terms of reference were subsequently altered in terls of

:05:44.:05:45.

going into lessons learned. Certainly. I thank the Minister for

:05:46.:05:51.

taking an intervention. I t`ke on board what he's saying. He's being

:05:52.:05:55.

very positive and is clearlx listening to the concerns wd

:05:56.:06:00.

phrased. On a couple of matters firstly, the fact we are thd only

:06:01.:06:02.

country, that is surely a good thing given how far behind we lagged, we

:06:03.:06:12.

have an opportunity to lead the world and show the world how this

:06:13.:06:14.

can be done positively. Secondly, as he says, nobody on his side of the

:06:15.:06:17.

house wanted to see the inqtiry fall down. Is it not therefore hhs duty

:06:18.:06:20.

to intervene and make sure ht has the right resources, the right

:06:21.:06:24.

expertise, and the right processes? There is nothing their deputy

:06:25.:06:29.

speaker I disagree with, we all want this inquiry to work, the government

:06:30.:06:35.

hasn't established an inquiry to fail, and inquiry not to have the

:06:36.:06:38.

confidence of the Association. We need to get to the truth. It's a

:06:39.:06:48.

scientific process and becatse it is it can be frustrating and long

:06:49.:06:51.

winded, it can take a long time I want to talk a little bit about some

:06:52.:06:55.

of the, I suppose, concerns raised. There are three types of concerns

:06:56.:07:00.

raised during the afternoon. First of all, that the independent group

:07:01.:07:11.

of experts that has been set up are not reviewing this issue in terms of

:07:12.:07:14.

the regulatory concerns or the delays at that time. In particular,

:07:15.:07:16.

not reviewing the failures of the committee on the safety of

:07:17.:07:22.

medicines, here we heard about the 5--8-year delay that took place in

:07:23.:07:25.

the UK. The UK wasn't the l`st country to ban distro, but ht wasn't

:07:26.:07:29.

the first either. The second concern, and I'll talk in some

:07:30.:07:35.

length, members of the expert group may not be independent, thex may

:07:36.:07:38.

have not fully declared conflicts of interest. And somehow they `re

:07:39.:07:47.

colluding... We've heard words like cover-up from some members... The

:07:48.:07:49.

third concern is not all of the available evidence is being

:07:50.:07:51.

considered by the group. We've heard about the issues of German ,based

:07:52.:07:55.

material not being translatdd, all of that. I'll address all of those

:07:56.:08:02.

three points. In terms of the first issue, we've heard there was a

:08:03.:08:06.

regulatory failure here and the inquiry should be looking at that. I

:08:07.:08:16.

say to the house at this pohnt, if the expert group, when they report,

:08:17.:08:20.

that will be next spring, if they report a clear causal link, that is

:08:21.:08:26.

the time we need to take further action in terms of issues stch as

:08:27.:08:30.

regulation, liability, and `ll that go with that. The first step we are

:08:31.:08:38.

taking is to establish the science. The group that has been set up is an

:08:39.:08:41.

expert group, science lead. I think it's very important that we make it

:08:42.:08:50.

clear in this house that we are not criticising individual membdrs of

:08:51.:08:52.

that group, who are striving to get to the truth. And there is ` group

:08:53.:08:56.

of eminent people. It would be quite wrong if we conflated what light be

:08:57.:09:01.

the eventual need to look at the regulatory actions taken, to look at

:09:02.:09:05.

the legal liabilities. The first step is to establish whether the

:09:06.:09:12.

science takes us to that link. In spite of some of the comments made

:09:13.:09:15.

today, I have to say, that hs not being done yet in any country. The

:09:16.:09:20.

first serious attempt to do it is the attempt is now going on. The

:09:21.:09:29.

second point is that somehow... The second point I would say is that the

:09:30.:09:37.

expert working group is not impartial. Well, the

:09:38.:09:56.

NHRA has taken a vigorous approach to evaluating and handling `ny

:09:57.:09:59.

potential conflicts of interest No member of the expert working group

:10:00.:10:02.

can have any interest in anx of the companies involved or their

:10:03.:10:03.

predecessors. Members should not have publicly expressed a strong

:10:04.:10:05.

opinion, favourable or unfavourable, about the possibility of birth

:10:06.:10:08.

defects from these drugs. I think I had one of the contributions

:10:09.:10:10.

earlier, talking about one of the members that had treated. If there

:10:11.:10:12.

is evidence of that, we'll follow up on it. It's true one member was

:10:13.:10:15.

removed, not from the expert group, from the advisory group, because it

:10:16.:10:18.

was felt he had a conflict of interest. And it wasn't properly

:10:19.:10:22.

declared. Action was taken puickly in respect of that. I said to the

:10:23.:10:27.

house, this inquiry is chaired by a consultant gynaecologist from the

:10:28.:10:33.

charmers centre in Edinburgh. 1 scientists drawn from some of the

:10:34.:10:37.

best universities in the UK, we have no reason to believe any of these

:10:38.:10:41.

people are any more interested or have any more reason not to want to

:10:42.:10:46.

get to the truth than we do. On both sides of this house on that point.

:10:47.:10:51.

Does he not realise how important it is that whatever the rights and

:10:52.:11:00.

wrongs of the members of thd committee, its the families that

:11:01.:11:04.

need to have confidence. In it. It is they who need to have th`t

:11:05.:11:10.

confidence. There's no point saying they are wonderful people. The

:11:11.:11:14.

families have concerns. If they are not assuaged one Way Or Another the

:11:15.:11:18.

outcome will not have the confidence of the families. Madam Deputy

:11:19.:11:31.

Speaker I said at the start of my remarks, the learning part `re taken

:11:32.:11:33.

from my part of the debate, whatever we take in terms of truth, science,

:11:34.:11:36.

doing the right thing, the families are not happy. I made the point at

:11:37.:11:39.

the very start of this debate that we would do what we can to `mend

:11:40.:11:44.

that. As well as that, though, and I think members on both sides need to

:11:45.:11:47.

accept this, we need to get to the scientific truth. To get to the

:11:48.:11:50.

scientific truth, there needs to be a scientific process. That hs part

:11:51.:11:54.

of what has to happen here, it's why some of this is time-consumhng and

:11:55.:11:57.

difficult. And we wish that it wasn't. I'm grateful to be the

:11:58.:12:04.

minister, he's been generous in giving way. The terminology he is

:12:05.:12:08.

using is not necessarily suhtable. I don't understand this to be a

:12:09.:12:14.

scientific process per se. What I do understand is that it's an hnformed

:12:15.:12:18.

judgment about the evidence available, which, understandably, is

:12:19.:12:28.

best conducted by scientists. He was, in a previous existencd, a

:12:29.:12:30.

lawyer. You'll understand the difference between the two

:12:31.:12:33.

approaches. I'm guilty of m`ny things, Madam Deputy Speaker, but

:12:34.:12:37.

I've never been a lawyer. I also think I do understand the dhfference

:12:38.:12:41.

between the two processes and if I wasn't clear in that, I accdpt the

:12:42.:12:47.

distinction he made. The only point I would make, again, is that this

:12:48.:12:51.

panel has got 14 people, plts some lay members, who are not schentists,

:12:52.:12:56.

14 people who are chosen with particular skills regarding the

:12:57.:12:57.

issues involved. I know the member for Bolton South

:12:58.:13:09.

East needs to sum up. I want to dress the third point, whether all

:13:10.:13:12.

the evidence available will be reviewed by that expert grotp. The

:13:13.:13:23.

answer is yes. It's the reason it's taking so long. A particular

:13:24.:13:25.

question was raised regarding a great deal of evidence newlx come to

:13:26.:13:28.

light, which was in German. All of that evidence will be translated,

:13:29.:13:30.

all of the translations of that evidence put before that colmittee,

:13:31.:13:36.

and the chairman of that colmittee will be responsible for enstring its

:13:37.:13:39.

properly reviewed and looked at There is no intention that this

:13:40.:13:41.

inquiry does anything other than properly

:13:42.:13:52.

resourced and attempt to get to the truth. The truth is difficult for

:13:53.:13:56.

something that happened 40-40 years ago. We need to accept that. I want

:13:57.:13:59.

finish, Madam Deputy Speaker, making the same point I made at thd start.

:14:00.:14:04.

I'm responsible, the governlent is responsible, for the efficacy of the

:14:05.:14:07.

inquiry and we need to get to the right answer. It's also important, I

:14:08.:14:11.

do accept this, that the inpuiry does not have the confidencd of some

:14:12.:14:17.

of the stakeholders. It's not acceptable, not satisfactorx. I ll

:14:18.:14:20.

make the same undertaking the Minister for life science m`y two

:14:21.:14:30.

years ago, to try to put thd inquiry into place, we'll try to put that

:14:31.:14:33.

right. I make the offer agahn. A detailed letter with the detailed

:14:34.:14:35.

points being made will be answered and we'll have a meeting to discuss

:14:36.:14:39.

that subsequently. Thank yot Madam Deputy Speaker. I want to thank all

:14:40.:14:42.

the members who came and attended the debate today and I want to thank

:14:43.:14:48.

the victims who are in the gallery here. Not all of them but some of

:14:49.:14:52.

them. Also Marie Lyon. We don't often refer to those people but I

:14:53.:14:58.

would effect my researcher who has been doing incredible work on this

:14:59.:15:02.

for the last couple of years. Glad to hear the Minister has sahd

:15:03.:15:07.

they'll meet with us. We ard happy to write more detailed information

:15:08.:15:13.

about where our concerns ard. The only thing is, we need to elphasise

:15:14.:15:18.

this again, my honourable friend mentioned just a minute ago, the

:15:19.:15:24.

inquiry isn't so much about the medical evidence. They are not

:15:25.:15:29.

carrying out experiments to ascertain whether there is `

:15:30.:15:33.

scientific link. The crux is, there was a lot of evidence avail`ble at

:15:34.:15:38.

the time, it was a failure to do anything, that is the crux of it.

:15:39.:15:41.

The victims have not been hdard properly so far, and that wd need

:15:42.:15:49.

the inquiry to help. I take the assurances the Minister givds and

:15:50.:15:53.

wait to see what happens. The question is as on the order paper.

:15:54.:15:57.

This house may now adjourn. The question is that this house do now

:15:58.:16:09.

adjourn. Thank you, Madam Deputy Spe`ker I

:16:10.:16:22.

decided to call this debate because I wanted to highlight the cost of

:16:23.:16:29.

living for disabled people. The truth is disabled people should be

:16:30.:16:31.

able to learn, live and work independently without facing a

:16:32.:16:33.

financial penalty. Unfortun`tely this is not the case. Whethdr

:16:34.:16:35.

because of a huge digital divide or wheelchair

:16:36.:16:51.

charge in taxis. Or unaffordable social care. Disabled peopld face a

:16:52.:16:54.

financial penalty in almost every aspect of their life. When we

:16:55.:16:56.

consider the ability to livd independently in 21st-century

:16:57.:16:58.

Britain, we often think of factors such as growth, wages, pricds, and,

:16:59.:17:01.

of course, any short-term shocks to the economy. As we try to ensure

:17:02.:17:09.

taxpayers of this country c`n afford to get by, and put financial cost at

:17:10.:17:12.

the heart of policy-making, often we overlook the fact disabled people

:17:13.:17:16.

are facing financial penalthes that none of us have to face if we are

:17:17.:17:24.

able able bodied. We don't think about the difficulties disabled

:17:25.:17:28.

people face to live independently, and the extra costs they max face

:17:29.:17:30.

from time to time. The root causes of these, investigathons have

:17:31.:17:54.

been fragmented. Imbalances in the market mean the costs of thhngs

:17:55.:17:56.

disabled people have to buy, assistive technology, remain harder

:17:57.:17:58.

than they need to be. -- whhle you. Because of the shortage of time I

:17:59.:18:01.

will focus... Order. I beg to move this house do now adjourn. Shall I

:18:02.:18:04.

start again? In this debate because of the lack of time, I'll focus

:18:05.:18:07.

mainly on the causes of extra cost rather than the well trodden path of

:18:08.:18:10.

existing support payments. H acknowledge from the outset the

:18:11.:18:15.

total to manage these extra cost is made all the more difficult by the

:18:16.:18:19.

factory support is increasingly difficult to obtain. As most people

:18:20.:18:25.

will be aware, the government is undertaking a second review into

:18:26.:18:31.

payment. It must protect personal independence payment from any form

:18:32.:18:35.

of taxation or means testing, so disabled people have adequate

:18:36.:18:40.

support to help meet extra costs. The personal independence p`yment

:18:41.:18:44.

assessment cannot be said to reflect the extra costs disabled people

:18:45.:18:50.

face. It is clear the government must redesign the personal

:18:51.:18:53.

independence payment assesslent so it more accurately captures the

:18:54.:18:57.

level of disabled people's dxtra costs.

:18:58.:19:16.

It seems a grave injustice that disabled people face disproportional

:19:17.:19:20.

costs to live a life of dignity and independence. I'm of the firm belief

:19:21.:19:23.

in a society is judged by how it protects the most vulnerabld and the

:19:24.:19:25.

most needy. If we allow these costs to mount, we are failing to protect

:19:26.:19:32.

the most vulnerable and needy. In my constituency there are around 1 ,000

:19:33.:19:37.

disabled people around workhng age and according to the figures, this

:19:38.:19:41.

year in February, in the DWP, the number of constituents in rdceipt of

:19:42.:19:45.

employment support allowancd, personal independence payment and

:19:46.:19:51.

incapacity benefits stands `t nearly 6000. Across London figures are even

:19:52.:19:52.

higher. My personal experience of stpporting

:19:53.:20:04.

a disabled parent and the sheer number of disabled people who live

:20:05.:20:07.

in my constituency is why I've brought this debate of the house

:20:08.:20:10.

today. Some of the disabled people who live in my constituency live in

:20:11.:20:14.

the top 4% of income to deprived wards in the country. The pressure

:20:15.:20:21.

they are under is clear. It's been underlined heavily by the extra

:20:22.:20:26.

costs commission, an independent report undertaken by the ch`rity

:20:27.:20:31.

Scope. I'd like to put my thanks to them on record, they've helped a lot

:20:32.:20:32.

with this debate. Subtitles will resume at 11pm for

:20:33.:21:03.

Thursday in Parliament.

:21:04.:21:07.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS