05/12/2016 The Papers

watching, coming up is the papers. -- thank you very much for watching.

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

With me are the business academic Melanie Eusebe and Joel Taylor,

Let's take a look at the front pages then...

The Telegraph reports on comments made by Bank of England

governor Mark Carney, warning of people being left behind

case in the supreme court - where the government is arguing

that the referendum gave Ministers the power to trigger brexit

with some Conservative Mps threatening to vote with Labour

in a parliamentary vote later this week.

The Metro's front page is devoted to a report

a high number of assaults against members of the emergency

The Guardian carries news of more allegations about child sex abuse in

football. This headline paraphrases the government case. And the Times

reports that Britain should finish the year with the fastest growing

economy in the G7 group. The High Court was wrong, for calling the

decision legally irrelevant on whether MPs should vote on the

"Brexit" choice. For me, I think that this is getting more and more

confusing. We voted yes or no, as a population. Now we are getting into

the weeds of how it is going to happen. I think that this is leaving

most of the population behind in terms of the population. We are

entering into this territory where I think that inflammatory statements

like judges are wrong about the EU exit are what the populace is going

to work on. Rather than what actually needs to happen. That has

been frankly the problem through this whole debate. The referendum,

post-referendum. The public are not well served by many of us in the

media. It is very tricky, this article is interesting, it talks

about judges being wrong, very definite, the Attorney General

slammed a High Court ruling, almost makes it sound like today's

proceedings were dramatic, having listened, it really was not! Iain

Duncan Smith said it was like watching paint dry. I should imagine

he would probably know! The problem is we get phone calls, people say,

we wanted to leave, why haven't we left, but there is no clear idea of

what leaving the EU means, the government is going through this

appeal in the Supreme Court, does it really need to have done so? Be not,

it has the support in the House of Commons to get the Article 50 vote,

but it is... Why are they pushing it? It is about the parameters. We

were not well prepared as a country in terms of what we would have to do

their afterwards. The promises that were made, if you vote out, we are

pressing the out button tomorrow. Rather than it being, OK, if you

vote out, we understand this is how you feel as a population, and we are

going to investigate what that means. So the actuality is that we

have two investigate what it means to leave. Inflammatory statements

like this, you are right, it is not describe what the proceedings are

going to look like, it is going to be a long dreary process. Whose

fault is this? LAUGHTER Well... Quite a long list... The

Conservatives, David Cameron Giffnock want it to get to this

stage, expected to win the vote, he lost the vote, left immediately, no

clear direction within the government about where to go next,

on the other hand, Theresa May, I get the impression, with Boris

Johnson, she is sending him out to different parts of the world to test

the water to see how far he can push, where he can take Brexit two,

and people will say, don't be silly. I think it is a cunning plan, TUC

where the limits are. -- to see where he can take "Brexit" to. -- to

see where the limits are. Just listen to what they are saying,

rather than have this very English, ironic, we can push things, we can

tweak things approach. But they are just plain speaking in Europe, you

are not going to get access to the single market without free movement

of people. That is what they have been saying, why don't we just

accept that? Why didn't we accept that before we press the button?

Good things become a little more clear, if, as is being reported

here, there is a win for the Labour Party and their motion, with some

Tories potentially backing it... In order for the government to explain

at least the outlines of its Brexit strategy, might that help the public

understand what is going on? Survey, we will wait to see if this revolt

really materialises, I have seen 20 Tory MPs, 40, 50, we will see... The

government has been very definite, it does not want to reveal anything

good for negotiation start, it thinks it will weaken their hand,

but we know that as soon as they present their hand, through the EU,

the EU will show everybody. There is a fundamental flaw, whether... The

other problem Labour has, they have not got a clear idea of what to do

either. Keir Starmer, who was a very impressive lawyer, he is now in the

Parliamentary Labour Party, and he is trusted with this job of creating

a Labour policy, when really, the Labour Party is all over the place.

Part of the point about the role of Parliament in all of this, the

majority are remain. The majority are remain as, and unfortunately, it

may be interpreted as one last-ditch effort to prevent "Brexit". I think

this is going to add to the confusion that... Everyone else who

was not part of the government, in regards to what is happening with

Brexit, why don't we just say that we don't know, why not say we have

never been here before and we don't know, rather than is being, force

someone's hand to reveal a plan that quite frankly we know they do not

have! They do not have a plan. Not yet, anyway. Will they have it in

time? By March? Time is the one thing that will force them to come

up with a plan. These negotiations last for 18 months and nothing

happens until the last couple of weeks, and then they finally start

fixing what they want to do. Like students doing their exams! Focusing

on High Court rulings, additional vote for the Labour Party, quite

frankly, you are not focusing on the plan for Brexit. Bit of a warning

here, on the Daily Telegraph, Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of

England, he's warning of a lost decade, people losing trust in

globalisation as Italy vote threatens Euro. He is only saying

what loads of people have been saying for quite a while. The only

thing I would change about the title is that they are not losing trust,

they have lost trust, and you see that evidence by the Trump vote as

well. Globalisation has not work for everyone, there is deep inequality.

It is good that Mark Carney was able to identify that, people blaming

globalisation. Corporations not paying taxes, insecure unemployment,

inequality, it is quite positive that he is identifying that this is

where the problem lies, however, on the other hand, in terms of the

solutions he has presented in terms of stateless corporations paying

taxes, or in regards to the upskilling of the workforce, I think

that is something that requires solutions that are much deeper and

relies upon a cultural change. Globalisation has failed most of the

planet, thinking about how money people are on this planet, the

inequality is rife now, and every country, not just west Europe. As

far as the developing world is concerned, India, China, Brazil,

those states, in fact, globalisation has been a positive benefit. It is

in the developing world it has done well, but globalisation has affected

the old industrial economies like ours and America. So on and so

forth. That is the revolt we are seeing, those old industrial

countries, which did well 100 years ago are now struggling. No? With

globalisation... You are the business brain. It is about

political economy. We can no longer look at nation state, we have to

look at the individuals within nation states, there has been a

redistribution of wealth at a nation state level but within those nation

states is, a million people in China... Women look at

globalisation, we look at every individual as an individual.

We only have three minutes left already! Onto the times. Britain

will be the fastest-growing economy in the G-7. In contrast to the last

decade of Mark Carney. Britain could finish the year as the

fastest-growing economy for seven leading nations. This is according

to an askew index, not one that I'm particular with particularly. This

is a consequence of the services sector, doing well, in spite of

Brexit. It is good to see there is some optimism in sectors of the

economy. They get Mark Carney in there. The first lost decades in the

1860s, which is fairly brutal. Even though the economy is

fastest-growing, real wages are still not going anywhere. Mark

Carney talking about the last ten years flat, 30, 40 years. He has

warned that it is going to happen even longer. Very briefly, front

page of the Guardian, new claims of hush money as football abuse scandal

widens, the picture is ex-players, who claimed they were abused, who

have now set up an organisation to help other victims who may have been

affected. Finally, we will go to the Turner Prize.

Helen Marten has won the Turner prize, the most prestigious art

prize in the world today, she has won it, and the article here says

that it really is a load of old rubbish(!) that is the criticism of

the Turner Prize but she uses everyday items. She does, everything

from cotton buds and bicycle chains, marbles, she uses everything. It is

representative of the world today, and the lens of the world today. I

have not managed to see it yet but it is a sculpture indicating the

condition of the world. 31 years old, from Macclesfield, really proud

of her. These times as well, Ben Okri and Nicholas Serota, in their

speeches, representing her, they spoke of the importance of art. And

culture in these times. This is the second award that she

has won in a few months. She won the Hepworth prize, ?30,000, she shared

that with the other nominees. Very inspirational young lady. In fact,

we have a picture for viewers, this is one installation, which is there.

This is a collection of stuff... Apparently it is a caterpillar.

And... That is not a caterpillar, it looks like a house! The winner of

the Turner Prize. You have got to go and see it. Thank you very much for

going through the newspapers with us. That is it for the newspapers

denied, all the front pages are online at the BBC news website, you

can read a detailed review of all of the newspapers. You can see us there

too, in all of our glory, with each night's addition, and so thank you

again, Melanie, Joel. -- each night edition.