10/03/2014 BBC London News


10/03/2014

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 10/03/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

shortly. They have an investigation into why some police forces in the

:00:00.3:59:59

UK are Good evening.

:00:00.:00:16.

It's been claimed that flooding along parts of the Thames this

:00:17.:00:20.

winter was made worse by thd lack of dredging over recent years. BBC

:00:21.:00:27.

London has spoken to former employees with decades of dredging

:00:28.:00:29.

experience who claim the authorities were warned in the 1990s about the

:00:30.:00:33.

risk of not removing sediment from the river. This special report from

:00:34.:00:40.

Gareth Furby. It's a new housing developmdnt by

:00:41.:00:44.

the Thames in Sunbury. But what is bothering some locals is not that

:00:45.:00:49.

this is in their backyard btt the fact that a large piece of kit is

:00:50.:00:55.

now missing from the yard. Dverybody was sad to see it go becausd we

:00:56.:01:01.

believed it was a necessity. He s talking about this, one of the

:01:02.:01:04.

dredgers that used to work tp and down the Thames. Now the Environment

:01:05.:01:09.

Agency yard is changing. Thd big dredgers have gone and some people

:01:10.:01:15.

believe that recent floods were made worse because the Thames wasn't

:01:16.:01:21.

being regularly cleared of silt All throughout the office was sdven

:01:22.:01:26.

inches of water. Johnny used to work as a dredging contract. His property

:01:27.:01:31.

was flooded last month. He has no doubt that if the Thames was still

:01:32.:01:35.

dredged, the flood would not have been as bad. The water levels would

:01:36.:01:40.

have been lower, up to four or five inches. It would have saved a lot of

:01:41.:01:46.

properties. How much materi`l was being removed before dredging was

:01:47.:01:52.

wound down in the mid`1990s? BBC London has tracked down two

:01:53.:02:00.

ex`employees. Kenny Beard w`s a supervisor. In his career, he thinks

:02:01.:02:06.

he personally shifted 100,000 tonnes. He remembers well the day

:02:07.:02:10.

his bosses said the river w`s self dredging. We just laughed! We said,

:02:11.:02:20.

OK. All right. If that is what you reckon. It is going to cost

:02:21.:02:32.

millions. Malcolm says some staff tested by the policy still went

:02:33.:02:37.

ahead. Now, following the floods come he is angry with his former

:02:38.:02:42.

employers. They have ignored people. They can protect a Kingfishdr and a

:02:43.:02:50.

badger, but not people. Conservation overtook flood defence. This

:02:51.:02:53.

afternoon the Environment Agency said flooding...

:02:54.:03:05.

This is an issue which isn't going away, though.

:03:06.:03:09.

Marc Ashdown is by the river in Teddington now. But, of course, the

:03:10.:03:13.

Environment Agency needs to convince residents along the Thames they have

:03:14.:03:24.

a long`term plan. That is rhght This is where the tidal Thales ends.

:03:25.:03:28.

The Environment Agency has ` lot to do to convince people they `re doing

:03:29.:03:33.

enough. They say that dredghng has a place in some rivers, just not here

:03:34.:03:36.

in the Thames. They maintain they are spending lots of money to

:03:37.:03:41.

protect homes. It is about what is right for the locations. We have

:03:42.:03:46.

scheme down on the lower part of the Thames, the River Thames scheme

:03:47.:03:52.

?256 million for flood risk reduction. That is the long`term

:03:53.:03:57.

solution. Dredging is a verx short`term solution which, during

:03:58.:04:02.

the low flows and summer droughts, sediment coming down will fhll those

:04:03.:04:06.

holes very quickly and we whll be back to square one. It is not

:04:07.:04:10.

cost`effective. That is why we want to work with partners to provide

:04:11.:04:16.

that long`term solution. It is worth pointing out that we have h`d

:04:17.:04:19.

exceptional rainfall, as much, apparently, in the past few weeks as

:04:20.:04:24.

in the two big floods of recent years combined. The fences have come

:04:25.:04:36.

a long way. `` defences. Thousands of homeowners who would be

:04:37.:04:39.

affected by noise from a possible second runway at Gatwick ard being

:04:40.:04:42.

promised ?1,000 a year towards their council tax. Airport bosses say it's

:04:43.:04:47.

to compensate for the noise. But has it been welcomed by residents under

:04:48.:04:52.

the flight? Here's Sarah Smhth. Gatwick has long been a noisy

:04:53.:04:57.

neighbour and 30 year residdnt Ian White is not impressed at the

:04:58.:05:02.

compensation on offer. You get used to living with it over the xears,

:05:03.:05:06.

but with another one it is going to be bringing the aeroplane is close

:05:07.:05:12.

to the built`up areas. One `` and the money won't help? Not at all.

:05:13.:05:19.

What is it going to do. It will not stop the night. The money would go

:05:20.:05:29.

to council tax payers in ardas affected. We are reacting to

:05:30.:05:34.

questions put to us by local authorities and local peopld who

:05:35.:05:37.

want to understand how we could minimise the impact of a second

:05:38.:05:42.

runway here. We see the compensation as one part of that. Here,

:05:43.:05:47.

campaigners have long campahgn against airport noise. They are

:05:48.:05:52.

outside the compensation arda. Those against the second runway s`y it

:05:53.:05:58.

would not have works, anywax. It is ?1000 for the complete change in

:05:59.:06:02.

infrastructure, schools, hospitals, doctors surgeries, the traffic on

:06:03.:06:05.

the roads, etc, that people will experience. Some, though, are happy

:06:06.:06:12.

with the offer. Nobody is going to say no to that, so, yeah, if it was

:06:13.:06:18.

there to be taken off the b`ck of a second runway, then why not? Many

:06:19.:06:25.

businesses believe expansion is crucial and Gatwick is despdrate for

:06:26.:06:32.

the airports commission to choose a new runway. If it does, then new

:06:33.:06:36.

runway would open about ten years later. `` the new runway.

:06:37.:06:40.

Just before the weather, a puick reminder that Late Kick Off has a

:06:41.:06:43.

round`up of Football League action at11:20. I'll say goodnight and hand

:06:44.:06:51.

you over to Wendy. Good evening. We have a beattiful

:06:52.:06:55.

and the weekend. This is how it looked. Through this week it will be

:06:56.:07:00.

sometimes as sunny and also dry as high pressure stays with us. At the

:07:01.:07:04.

moment we have got a fair alount of cloud cover. It is not going to turn

:07:05.:07:11.

to chilly through the night. We will have those grey skies first thing

:07:12.:07:15.

tomorrow morning, and also ` north`easterly breeze. That will

:07:16.:07:18.

make it feel a bit cooler, H should think. Further south`east, the more

:07:19.:07:22.

likely you are to hold on through the day. Parts of Buckinghalshire

:07:23.:07:27.

and Essex are likely to get some brightness. Temperatures at around

:07:28.:07:32.

11 or 12 degrees. This is the outlook.

:07:33.:07:32.

11 or 12 degrees. This is the outlook. If you are heading

:07:33.:07:35.

somewhere else in the UK, you need the forecast. Hello. The local

:07:36.:07:41.

weather detail you have just heard fit into an overall pattern which is

:07:42.:07:45.

now equivocal in different from the one that gave us our wettest winter

:07:46.:07:47.

on record. We have spent the day watching high

:07:48.:07:52.

pressure pushing across the UK. It is settling our weather down like

:07:53.:07:56.

any area of high pressure. It is here for a while. It is here for

:07:57.:08:00.

this week. The Jetstream has moved north and the wet and whether -

:08:01.:08:04.

whinny systems have moved towards Iceland.

:08:05.:08:06.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS