Browse content similar to 22/05/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
filtering through. By Monday feeling warm for | :00:00. | :00:25. | |
who says that new DNA regulations could show that he is innocent. The | :00:26. | :00:30. | |
community transport group refused badgers because of confusion over | :00:31. | :00:39. | |
regulations. It is a lifeline for many people. That is their only | :00:40. | :00:43. | |
chance for some people come out, coming with us. | :00:44. | :00:48. | |
A warning from the police, do not jump the weights at roadworks on the | :00:49. | :00:52. | |
A11 because we will catch you if you do `` jump the lights. | :00:53. | :01:01. | |
And the artwork left behind by the American airmen. | :01:02. | :01:06. | |
First tonight, the convicted killer who says a ruling to allow DNA | :01:07. | :01:09. | |
samples to be retested would allow him to prove his innocence. | :01:10. | :01:12. | |
Antonio Lopes is serving a life sentence for killing | :01:13. | :01:15. | |
But he's pinning his hopes on the result of a test case being brought | :01:16. | :01:20. | |
by this man, who also claims he has been wrongly jailed for murder. | :01:21. | :01:23. | |
Kevin Nunn was found guilty in 2006 of killing | :01:24. | :01:26. | |
The Supreme Court is considering his plea that DNA samples | :01:27. | :01:30. | |
from his case should be re`examined using the latest technology. | :01:31. | :01:33. | |
Antonio Lopes says the same kind of review could clear him. | :01:34. | :01:42. | |
In a moment we'll talk to the solicitor who's representing | :01:43. | :01:44. | |
First,though, this report from Debbie Tubby. | :01:45. | :01:49. | |
Antonio Lopes has protested his innocence for more than a decade. He | :01:50. | :01:55. | |
was sentenced to life for killing his partner, Dominguez Olivais, her | :01:56. | :01:59. | |
body washed up on the banks of the River Bure. This was her memorial | :02:00. | :02:08. | |
Norfolk Police say it was the Criminal Cases Review Commission | :02:09. | :02:27. | |
to refer the matter to the appeal courts. | :02:28. | :02:29. | |
Kevin Nunn is waiting for this landmark ruling | :02:30. | :02:31. | |
He?s always protested his innocence and has campaigned | :02:32. | :02:35. | |
He?s serving a minimum of 22 years for murdering | :02:36. | :02:39. | |
We?ve been trying to get hold of the DNa evidence | :02:40. | :02:47. | |
and other exhibits from Suffolk Police for over eight years and | :02:48. | :02:50. | |
We can only assume so that it too can be re`tested. | :02:51. | :02:57. | |
not just important for Kevin, it?s important for people like Kevin | :02:58. | :03:00. | |
Suffolk Police told us its decision not to release the evidence was | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
Both cases are relying on the advances in DNA technology, | :03:06. | :03:11. | |
which have changed considerably in the last year, | :03:12. | :03:13. | |
Will it is now possible to get DNA profiling from small samples that | :03:14. | :03:27. | |
previously it would be impossible to get. The technology has advanced a | :03:28. | :03:34. | |
lot. This ruling will have rapper cautions for police forces across | :03:35. | :03:38. | |
the country, but experts say that this is the law just catching up | :03:39. | :03:45. | |
with science. And if the wrong person has been convicted murderer | :03:46. | :03:46. | |
still needs to be cot. This afternoon I spoke to James | :03:47. | :03:50. | |
Saunders, the solicitor representing I asked him why it wasn't already | :03:51. | :03:52. | |
a person's right to have access to I have no idea what has driven | :03:53. | :03:57. | |
the East Anglian police to take High Court judge said, well, there | :03:58. | :04:02. | |
wasn?t actually a right,. And that has meant that the processes of | :04:03. | :04:11. | |
cooperation which have successfully got us by over many years have come | :04:12. | :04:14. | |
to an end and so we?re going to the which have successfully got us | :04:15. | :04:18. | |
by over many years have come to an end and so we?re going to | :04:19. | :04:21. | |
the Supreme Court to overturn it. How, at the moment, does someone | :04:22. | :04:45. | |
like Antonio Lopes, for example, get that DNA looked at if he needs to? | :04:46. | :04:48. | |
Does he have to get permission from you can go to the Criminal Cases | :04:49. | :04:53. | |
Review Commission and, indeed, Does he have to get permission from | :04:54. | :04:57. | |
the Criminal Cases Review Board? got any fresh evidence, that is, the | :04:58. | :05:00. | |
work hasn?t been done to look for Antonio Lopes has done that and they | :05:01. | :05:04. | |
said, oh, well, because you haven?t got any fresh evidence, that is, the | :05:05. | :05:09. | |
work hasn?t been done to look for the DNA, then we can?t refer | :05:10. | :05:12. | |
the case back to the Court of Appeal then it would happily put me out of | :05:13. | :05:16. | |
a job, but at the moment there is no route for a man like Antonio Lopes, | :05:17. | :05:21. | |
other than what I?m going to do. And if you do win this case at the | :05:22. | :05:25. | |
Supreme Court, do you envisage it would happily put me out of a job, | :05:26. | :05:29. | |
but at the moment there is no route for a man like Antonio Lopes, | :05:30. | :05:33. | |
other than what I?m going to do. I'm sure there will be more than | :05:34. | :05:40. | |
just the two that I am dealing with, but what they do in the States, and | :05:41. | :05:43. | |
what could he be intelligent way to approach it here, would need to have | :05:44. | :05:47. | |
a look at the other evidence in the case. In cases where the evidence is | :05:48. | :05:52. | |
circumstantial it seems to me that if there is an opportunity to | :05:53. | :06:01. | |
resolve matters then it would be absolutely right to do that. | :06:02. | :06:06. | |
Obviously there are instances where DNA evidence is looked at again by | :06:07. | :06:10. | |
the police themselves. Absolutely. It is a very unequal position and | :06:11. | :06:16. | |
logically saw. If the police wanted to check out the DNA themselves on | :06:17. | :06:27. | |
the Kevin Nunn case, they could just what then the corridor and get the | :06:28. | :06:31. | |
information and send it to their lab. They are less happy to do that | :06:32. | :06:39. | |
in solves, ' is, crimes, than on salt grains. If it turned out that | :06:40. | :06:45. | |
it was the person `` ban on unsolved crimes. As it turned out that it was | :06:46. | :06:49. | |
not that person, then it would have to be opened again. | :06:50. | :06:51. | |
Disabled people say they could become prisoners in their own homes | :06:52. | :06:54. | |
because transport groups which have always been allowed to | :06:55. | :06:56. | |
use blue parking badges are suddenly having their applications | :06:57. | :06:59. | |
Suffolk County Council says the groups will need to prove they | :07:00. | :07:03. | |
care for as well as transport disabled people after | :07:04. | :07:05. | |
Donald is 87. He has dementia and has to use a wheelchair. This | :07:06. | :07:20. | |
community buses has lifeline to the outside world. Every three`week his | :07:21. | :07:25. | |
daughter Susan takes him into town. This blue badge allows the bus to | :07:26. | :07:30. | |
drop off for other vehicles would get a parking ticket. But when it | :07:31. | :07:32. | |
expires it will not be renewed. I am expires it will not be renewed. I am | :07:33. | :07:37. | |
not exactly very happy about it. It means a lot to me and to dad. I have | :07:38. | :07:42. | |
been very upset, because it is his life. He is going to town, trying to | :07:43. | :07:50. | |
live a normal life. Why can't you get a blue bag yourself? Because I | :07:51. | :07:56. | |
do not drive. If we did not have the blue badge, we cannot go to certain | :07:57. | :08:01. | |
people both anywhere, we have to people both anywhere, we have to | :08:02. | :08:03. | |
wait for a parking | :08:04. | :08:05. |