22/05/2014 Look East - East


22/05/2014

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 22/05/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

filtering through. By Monday feeling warm for

:00:00.:00:25.

who says that new DNA regulations could show that he is innocent. The

:00:26.:00:30.

community transport group refused badgers because of confusion over

:00:31.:00:39.

regulations. It is a lifeline for many people. That is their only

:00:40.:00:43.

chance for some people come out, coming with us.

:00:44.:00:48.

A warning from the police, do not jump the weights at roadworks on the

:00:49.:00:52.

A11 because we will catch you if you do `` jump the lights.

:00:53.:01:01.

And the artwork left behind by the American airmen.

:01:02.:01:06.

First tonight, the convicted killer who says a ruling to allow DNA

:01:07.:01:09.

samples to be retested would allow him to prove his innocence.

:01:10.:01:12.

Antonio Lopes is serving a life sentence for killing

:01:13.:01:15.

But he's pinning his hopes on the result of a test case being brought

:01:16.:01:20.

by this man, who also claims he has been wrongly jailed for murder.

:01:21.:01:23.

Kevin Nunn was found guilty in 2006 of killing

:01:24.:01:26.

The Supreme Court is considering his plea that DNA samples

:01:27.:01:30.

from his case should be re`examined using the latest technology.

:01:31.:01:33.

Antonio Lopes says the same kind of review could clear him.

:01:34.:01:42.

In a moment we'll talk to the solicitor who's representing

:01:43.:01:44.

First,though, this report from Debbie Tubby.

:01:45.:01:49.

Antonio Lopes has protested his innocence for more than a decade. He

:01:50.:01:55.

was sentenced to life for killing his partner, Dominguez Olivais, her

:01:56.:01:59.

body washed up on the banks of the River Bure. This was her memorial

:02:00.:02:08.

Norfolk Police say it was the Criminal Cases Review Commission

:02:09.:02:27.

to refer the matter to the appeal courts.

:02:28.:02:29.

Kevin Nunn is waiting for this landmark ruling

:02:30.:02:31.

He?s always protested his innocence and has campaigned

:02:32.:02:35.

He?s serving a minimum of 22 years for murdering

:02:36.:02:39.

We?ve been trying to get hold of the DNa evidence

:02:40.:02:47.

and other exhibits from Suffolk Police for over eight years and

:02:48.:02:50.

We can only assume so that it too can be re`tested.

:02:51.:02:57.

not just important for Kevin, it?s important for people like Kevin

:02:58.:03:00.

Suffolk Police told us its decision not to release the evidence was

:03:01.:03:05.

Both cases are relying on the advances in DNA technology,

:03:06.:03:11.

which have changed considerably in the last year,

:03:12.:03:13.

Will it is now possible to get DNA profiling from small samples that

:03:14.:03:27.

previously it would be impossible to get. The technology has advanced a

:03:28.:03:34.

lot. This ruling will have rapper cautions for police forces across

:03:35.:03:38.

the country, but experts say that this is the law just catching up

:03:39.:03:45.

with science. And if the wrong person has been convicted murderer

:03:46.:03:46.

still needs to be cot. This afternoon I spoke to James

:03:47.:03:50.

Saunders, the solicitor representing I asked him why it wasn't already

:03:51.:03:52.

a person's right to have access to I have no idea what has driven

:03:53.:03:57.

the East Anglian police to take High Court judge said, well, there

:03:58.:04:02.

wasn?t actually a right,. And that has meant that the processes of

:04:03.:04:11.

cooperation which have successfully got us by over many years have come

:04:12.:04:14.

to an end and so we?re going to the which have successfully got us

:04:15.:04:18.

by over many years have come to an end and so we?re going to

:04:19.:04:21.

the Supreme Court to overturn it. How, at the moment, does someone

:04:22.:04:45.

like Antonio Lopes, for example, get that DNA looked at if he needs to?

:04:46.:04:48.

Does he have to get permission from you can go to the Criminal Cases

:04:49.:04:53.

Review Commission and, indeed, Does he have to get permission from

:04:54.:04:57.

the Criminal Cases Review Board? got any fresh evidence, that is, the

:04:58.:05:00.

work hasn?t been done to look for Antonio Lopes has done that and they

:05:01.:05:04.

said, oh, well, because you haven?t got any fresh evidence, that is, the

:05:05.:05:09.

work hasn?t been done to look for the DNA, then we can?t refer

:05:10.:05:12.

the case back to the Court of Appeal then it would happily put me out of

:05:13.:05:16.

a job, but at the moment there is no route for a man like Antonio Lopes,

:05:17.:05:21.

other than what I?m going to do. And if you do win this case at the

:05:22.:05:25.

Supreme Court, do you envisage it would happily put me out of a job,

:05:26.:05:29.

but at the moment there is no route for a man like Antonio Lopes,

:05:30.:05:33.

other than what I?m going to do. I'm sure there will be more than

:05:34.:05:40.

just the two that I am dealing with, but what they do in the States, and

:05:41.:05:43.

what could he be intelligent way to approach it here, would need to have

:05:44.:05:47.

a look at the other evidence in the case. In cases where the evidence is

:05:48.:05:52.

circumstantial it seems to me that if there is an opportunity to

:05:53.:06:01.

resolve matters then it would be absolutely right to do that.

:06:02.:06:06.

Obviously there are instances where DNA evidence is looked at again by

:06:07.:06:10.

the police themselves. Absolutely. It is a very unequal position and

:06:11.:06:16.

logically saw. If the police wanted to check out the DNA themselves on

:06:17.:06:27.

the Kevin Nunn case, they could just what then the corridor and get the

:06:28.:06:31.

information and send it to their lab. They are less happy to do that

:06:32.:06:39.

in solves, ' is, crimes, than on salt grains. If it turned out that

:06:40.:06:45.

it was the person `` ban on unsolved crimes. As it turned out that it was

:06:46.:06:49.

not that person, then it would have to be opened again.

:06:50.:06:51.

Disabled people say they could become prisoners in their own homes

:06:52.:06:54.

because transport groups which have always been allowed to

:06:55.:06:56.

use blue parking badges are suddenly having their applications

:06:57.:06:59.

Suffolk County Council says the groups will need to prove they

:07:00.:07:03.

care for as well as transport disabled people after

:07:04.:07:05.

Donald is 87. He has dementia and has to use a wheelchair. This

:07:06.:07:20.

community buses has lifeline to the outside world. Every three`week his

:07:21.:07:25.

daughter Susan takes him into town. This blue badge allows the bus to

:07:26.:07:30.

drop off for other vehicles would get a parking ticket. But when it

:07:31.:07:32.

expires it will not be renewed. I am expires it will not be renewed. I am

:07:33.:07:37.

not exactly very happy about it. It means a lot to me and to dad. I have

:07:38.:07:42.

been very upset, because it is his life. He is going to town, trying to

:07:43.:07:50.

live a normal life. Why can't you get a blue bag yourself? Because I

:07:51.:07:56.

do not drive. If we did not have the blue badge, we cannot go to certain

:07:57.:08:01.

people both anywhere, we have to people both anywhere, we have to

:08:02.:08:03.

wait for a parking

:08:04.:08:05.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS