01/03/2017 100 Days

Hello and welcome to One Hundred Days.

It's a whole new tone from Donald Trump who gets good reviews

The President is optimistic and conciliatory - saying he wants

The time for a small thinking is over. The time for trivial fights is

behind us. His wish list, A trillion dollars for

infrastructure spending, more money for the military AND tax

cuts are his priorities, US stocks soar after the speech, but

the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan

Greenspan, tells us of his doubts about the President's

plans. America under Donald Trump will have

to fix it and pay for it all. Can to fix it and pay for it all. Can

you do it? Now. Ashfaq can he do it? No.

In France, the centre-right candidate for the Presidential

election, Francis Fillon, is placed under formal investigation

for the alleged misuse of public funds,

but he rejects calls to step aside.

Karen Pence, 350, not content is, 256, so the contents have it. --

contents. The British government suffers a

first defeat on Brexit legislation. The House of Lords backs an

opposition amendment which could And read my lips. A rare glimpse

into the President's big speech

preparations. You're watching One Hundred Days

with Katty Kay in Washington It was a very different

Donald Trump who addressed Congress last night -

less flame-thrower, more President. He was still tough on immigration

and terrorism but there was a surprising

splattering of optimism, too. In fact, so favourable

were the morning headlines - even from what he calls

the "failing" New York Times - that an often irascible President

could find nothing to moan about. Let's have a listen to some

of what he had to say. The vast majority of individuals

convicted of terrorism and terrorism-related offences, since

9/11, came From

Boston to San Bernardino, to the Pentagon, and yes, even the World

Trade Center. We have seen the attacks in France, in Belgium, in

Germany and all over the world. It is not compassion, but reckless, to

allow uncontrolled entry from places Those given the high honour of

admission to the United States, should support this country,

love its people and its values. We cannot allow a beachhead of

terrorism to form inside America. We cannot allow our nation to become

a sanctuary for extremists. Our foreign policy calls for direct,

robust and meaningful engagement It is American leadership based on

vital security influence, that we share with our allies all

across the globe. We strongly support Nato, an

alliance forged in the bonds of two world wars, that dethroned

fascism and the Cold War, and defeated

communism. But our partners must

meet their financial obligations. And now based on our strong

and frank discussions, In fact, I can tell

you the money is pouring in. Our North America Editor Jon Sopel

is with me. Much about the content of the speech

and the agenda but the headline was a question of tone. I want to show

you a tweet that has come from the Conservative commentator Kathleen

Parker. Those pictures of every sing in the back of the car, The Beast,

before he goes to Capitol Hill, fascinating. If you are the Rolling

Stones playing one of your hits, you don't need to be hers. When you are

trying out new lines and new songs you have diverse. He was trying out

something we haven't seen before from Donald Trump. A new persona,

inclusive, warm, positive, optimistic about the future, wanting

to bring people together, unifying. That was something we have not seen

from Donald Trump before, and the question people will be asking, like

you and me, was, was that a one-off, or will we see a new Donald Trump

emerging from the chrysalis of the first chaotic few weeks in the White

House? I'm sure that the blast saying to him today, look at the

reviews you're getting for that disciplined performance, you stuck

to the message that was written down for you, and it all worked out very

nicely. And he definitely likes good reviews. The people liked it and

Congress likes it. Let's have a look at Paul Ryan, the Conservative

Leader of the house, nodding and clapping, this is all very good. He

is even clapping the $1 trillion infrastructure project. This is a

clip when he is asked about funding and infrastructure project that is

half the size of the one that the president has put forward. Take a

look at his reaction. Would you help president Donald Trump cast a $550

billion infrastructure programme? Would that be something you would

help them achieve? That is not in the A Better Way. He's a man that

has got to corral the Conservatives and put promises into policy. Kenny

it? Last night it seemed like Mike Pence and Paul Ryan had been to the

same tailor and got a two-for-one offer on the same suit, shirt and

tie. Moving on from that, it is going to be difficult. These are

problems that every president has faced, not just Donald Trump, that

you can come forward with ideas like a $1 trillion infrastructure plan,

much that it might be needed, but will it be passed with fiscally

conservative Republicans who want to be paying down the deficit? He

talked about paper may -- paid paternity leave. Though seem like

very democratic things to be advocating. He also called for the

Democratic party to come into the tent, to embrace the changes he is

going to make. Is that going to happen? We heard a long wish list

last night. Turning that injury allergy might be something a little

more tricky. -- turning that into reality.

With us now is the Kansas Secretary of State,

the former chairman of the Kansas Republican Party, Kris Kobach.

A big supporter of Donald Trump. Did it go down well, where you were

sitting? Yes, I think it went very well. I was listening to your prior

commentary. It is important to put this speech in context. The State of

the Union message is the only one the president is required by the

constitution to give. It is a speech to be given to a joint session of

undress. The question is, has Donald Trump changed his demeanour or

manner of speaking? You will see all of the State of the Union messages

during the Trump presidency look like this because it's a specific

type of speech given to the legislature, where he lays out a

legislative agenda whilst as other speeches are speaking to the common

man, and it is a throng of thousands of people. He will probably give

that kind of speech to that audience and this kind of speech to Congress.

I take that, but isn't the one lesson that comes out of this that

there is a lot more power in the presidency when you are talking with

optimism and in positive terms than the resent counterpunching and

attacking opponents and getting dragged into meaningless arguments?

I think there was something to be said for that, absolutely. You want

to remember, this is handing the ball to Congress because it's the

first time he is laying out a legislative agenda, so he has to

project confidence and optimism that you can get it done and I will sign

a bill when it comes to my desk after you get it done. So in this

context that optimism is important and counterpunching doesn't serve

any purpose in the State of the Union message. Katy Clay here in

Washington. I want to ask about the substance and the detailed in this

speech -- McCrone. There was cause for more spending on the military,

family leave, clean air, and they spoke about health care reforms he

spoke about keeping in access for people with pre-existing conditions

and also conditions on Medicaid. Is he going to run into problems when

he tries to keep Conservatives on board with them? I think you are

right with respect to spending on infrastructure. You will have a

natural clash between the Conservative impulse in Congress to

keep spending under control and an ambitious agenda laid out by the

president. As far as the specifics on health care, and the repeal of

ObamaCare, I don't see conflict there. If you look at the Republican

alternatives, what we would like to be the case when ObamaCare is gone,

they include the things that Donald Trump was talking about, covering

people with pre-existing conditions. I don't see much fiction, there. On

the size of the infrastructure plan, the president is a deal-maker. He

has thrown out his initial offer, how about $1 trillion? At the end of

the day it is going to be something else. Another deal he was floating

yesterday was television news anchors here, was the idea of

proposing immigration reform with some kind of pathway to citizenship

for people who are currently here illegally. How would that go down

that his supporters therein Kansas? Any form of amnesty, where you are

having citizenship or not, giving legal staters to those in the

country illegally, would not go down well with his ace, and that includes

people in Kansas, just because he campaigned very vigorously during

the entire cycle of the presidency campaign, enforcing our laws and

against amnesty. Whether there is some element of amnesty or somebody

that comes from Congress remains to be seen but in terms of where his

base is, his days once our laws in first and not to have an amnesty.

Katty, let me ask you, there was a different tone to the speech but is

there any clue about who actually wrote it? We were told with the

inaugural speech that it was Steve Miller and Steve Bannon who were

behind it, and it was a much darker tone. Who wrote this one? The

striking thing about this speech that it was night and day compared

to the inaugural address. So the speculation is that somebody else

had their hands on this speech and wrote something that was effectively

much more conventional as a political speech. I have heard that

the Vice President got involved and that he wanted elements in there

with more calls for unity, that his daughter Ivanka and her aid got in

there on issues like child and family leave, so we have aired more

voices in there, so what is the president going to do going forward,

listen to those voices that got him rave reviews or is his instinct more

that Armageddon type image of America we saw any and all address?

It will be fascinating to watch his evolution. You wonder if the

positive spin on this might take him in a different direction. Let's turn

to France, now. Francois Fillon, the right wing

candidate to become the next President of France,

says he will fight on despite news today he will be placed under

formal investigation. He has been summoned to appear

before magistrates on March 15th, facing allegations he paid his wife

hundreds of thousands of euros of public money for parliamentary

work she might never have done. One of Mr Fillon's closest aides

resigned from the campaign today. He said the candidate had gone back

on his word to withdraw from the election if he was placed

under formal investigation. TRANSLATION: A number of my

political friends are talking about the political assassination. It is

in fact an assassination, because it is disproportionate, unprecedented,

by the choice of this calendar, it is not only me who is being

assassinated by these presidential elections, too.

Let's get more from Benedicte Paviot,

UK correspondent for the French network, France 24.

There will be many people who will point to that speech today and talk

about the arrogance of Francois Fillon. He is third in the polls,

he's facing all sorts of problems. Surely the right thing to do is step

aside and give the party a chance. We har 53 days away from the first

round of the presidential election on 23rd of April. Yes, there are a

lot of people wondering tonight, whether it is in France or abroad,

French nationals, who will vote in this election, and we really are

astonished that he is not quitting. He was in a defiant, combative mood.

He was supposed to appear before the media at 8am at an event that there

is a must for any top French politician. There were rumours he

might not appear, then he appeared at half past 12 at lunchtime with a

delayed press conference at his headquarters. But we have moved on

from there. You mentioned in your introduction the fact that one of

his key advisers, a former rival in the French primaries, before

Francois Fillon became the official candidate, he resigned at the end of

the afternoon. Now another centrist party, the has suspended and will

make a decision next week. He is losing support, haemorrhaging

support, but he is adamant he will not quit. And, of course, what the

French media are absolutely talking about is, they are replaying the

fact that, back in August, when he was placed under formal

investigation, if he was, he said he would quit as a candidate. The

question is with this appears before a judge that he told the world about

come on 15th of March, his wife, Penelope, is also going to appear

before the judge. That is two days before all French presidential

candidates who wish to stand in this presidential election are actually

going to, it is the last date before they can say that they have the 500

needed signatures to become a candidate in that election. It is

quite a year in Washington. Whatever Francois Fillon is saying, I won't

give up, surrender or withdraw, it looks like the end of his

presidential ambitions, one way or the other. What does it mean for the

Republican Party? Is it the end of their ambitions for this year

leased? The person who came second was Alain Juppe. Let's remember what

happened. Primaries are not a French phenomenon but an American one. It

is the first time that the French right has tried this and against all

expectations it was not Alain Juppe, another former Prime Minister, who

was favourite, not just within the centre-right but across the board

and in the polls for months, it was actually quite comfortably Francois

Fillon who won. He presented himself as somebody who was trustworthy and

wanted to preserve once. This is why it is not sitting well with his own

party. -- preserve France. 73% of people yesterday, just before this

happened, across the board in France, say politician should be

judged like any French citizen, no special rights, no stopping and

posing of the judicial process. But Francois Fillon has said, he has

made serious accusations against the judiciary, and the police, and he is

saying that he has been politically assassinated. So the people who

could benefit from this are Marine Le Pen and Emmanuel Macron. We have

had so many twists and turns, who knows? It is a fascinating

collection. We will be wondering what happens to Marine Le Pen,

because of this. It's already been nicknamed

the "Trump bump." That's right - the Dow has

breached the 21,000 mark for the first time ever -

partly as a result of the President's address

to Congress and the expectation

of higher interest rates. On the economy, Donald Trump

promised tax cuts and a huge increase in

infrastructure spending. Here he is. To launch our national rebuilding, I

will be asking Congress to approve legislation that produces a one

jillion dollars investment in infrastructure of the United States,

financed through both public and private capital, creating millions

of new jobs. APPLAUSE

Investors clearly liked what they heard.

What do the economic gurus make of it?

Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan. I started by asking

for his reaction to the economic policy of the President's address

It was a very important change in style which I frankly hadn't

expected to see when he came into office. And I was shocked, first,

that he did it. If he stays off Twitter, I think the world would be

better off. But overall, it was a good performance relative to what he

had done in the past. He laid out quite a lot of spending proposals

that he would like. Infrastructure, military, family leave, where was

the revenue side to pay for it all? Hidden. This is the issue. That was

not a speech that was meant to be taken literally. One that you must

ask, how do you find various things, there was nothing in their about

strong economic growth, well, where's that coming from? Right at

the moment we're going through a period of significant stagnation,

for five years. And this is having a critical impact on the whole

psychology of the economy. A democratic society has to be

perceived to have growth, which all of sudden, looks to sink into

populism. And what we're looking at basically at this moment as far as I

can see is something very similar to what is happening in Latin America.

Populism in that context is not an economic policy. It is basically a

cry of pain. The request is, somebody come and do something. As

great populists do, Donald Trump promises that it is going to be

fabulous. He is talking about, and he said it again yesterday, not in

his speech but during the course of the day, America under Donald Trump

will have 3% more growth. That's how he's going to fix it and pay for it

all. Can he do it? Now. Why see promising it, then, because then it

opens the door to disappointment. It is obvious. I think we underestimate

the impact on the marketplace of the issue of regulation. What the

markets are responding to is the elimination of this, not his other

policies, but the is a clean issue. The markets have responded well to

the President's address. In fact the markets have responded well ever

since he was elected. How far the canny financial markets become? Are

you concerned? I don't think it is too much of an exaggeration to say

that virtually all of the market response is the removal of

uncertainty. Turning our back to the direction of higher levels of

regulatory pressures. Which is not a surprise. Alan Greenspan, studiously

trying to stand in the middle, but do I pick up a hemp that he doesn't

think the numbers in this budget add up? -- pick up a hint. Alan

Greenspan has to be careful not to be too political but I did not hear

anything there apart from Donald Trump's the regulation plans, which

clearly the markets are loving, about saying this is going to be an

economic policy that makes any sense. Even if you can get it

through, but the numbers, perhaps, don't add up.

The British government has suffered its first

defeat on the Brexit Bill which is currently

The House of Lords voted in favour of an opposition-backed amendment

that would guarantee the future status of EU nationals

Britain is withdrawing from the EU's policy of free movement.

That leaves three million EU nationals currently in Britain,

and one million Britons who live in EU countries, in limbo.

and our chief political correspondent, Vicki Young.

358-256 in terms of votes. What does this mean for the Prime Minister's

timetable? This is a big defeat for the government, there is no doubt

about that. Theresa May hope to be able to offer this guaranteed to EU

citizens living here in Britain, but she does not want it to be a

unilateral action. She says it has got to be debated and negotiated

with other EU countries, because she's concerned about the British

people living elsewhere in the EU. The unelected House of Lords

tonight, they have not agreed with her, and in overwhelming fashion.

The Conservative government put in all its supporters people like the

novelist, Jeffrey Archer and composer Andrew Lloyd Webber, making

rare appearances, but it was not enough, and the opposition parties

say that they have given a lesson to the government in morality, the

right thing to do, they say, and a lesson in humanity. What happens

now, they go back to the elected House of Commons. Many of them have

concerns. The question is whether they will agree with the House of

Lords, whether Theresa May can continue as she wants to, and

trigger Article 50, starting those for more Brexit negotiations by the

end of this month. Vicki, thank you for the moment. You're watching 100

Days. Still to come, a warning for the City of London. We will hear

more from the former head of the US Federal Reserve about why he

believes Brexit will be bad for the UK economy. And the presidential

style preparation for public speaking. That is still to come on

100 Days. Good evening. Prepare yourself for a bumpy ride up to the

weekend. We have some wet and windy weather with things turning lively

tonight to England and Wales. Strong winds, and some rain and snow

around. Gales bashing the coast and we could see gusts of 50 miles an

hour even now across the South. And some heavy rain across parts of

Wales, northern England and the Midlands. Some of that might fall as

slowdown to quite low levels bringing some disruption. A quieter

night for the North, Northern Ireland in particular. Some wintry

showers across the north-west of Scotland in particular. Becoming dry

across southern counties, but wherever you are it will feel cold

and dry tonight. Those gales will soon subside but it will still feel

pretty blustery through the day. Rain and snow moving away from

central areas for a time, and many of us will settle into a half decent

day with a lot of dry weather as we get into the afternoon. Across the

south that is going to feel warm compared to today, plenty of

sunshine around and just the odd shower out to the west. A much

better afternoon across parts of northern England and North Wales

compared with the morning. Things settling down quite nicely. More

rain living large to the of Northern Ireland. The best of the sunshine

across eastern Scotland with further wintry showers in the West. It will

feel chilly in northern areas. Heading through the night, things go

downhill again across the South. A developing area of low pressure will

push bands of rain northwards across England and Wales as we get through

Friday, so a disappointing end to the week with some heavy rain for a

time. Some doubt about how far north that gets, but for most of Northern

Ireland and Scotland, we will probably get away with it. And low

pressure is going to dominate the weather right through the weekend.

If not this one, then another one coming in off the Atlantic. We know

what low pressure means. It means that rain is not going to be too far

away. Prepare for some wet weather at times and some strong winds. For

many of us, it will feel on the chilly side through this weekend.

Welcome back to One Hundred Days, with me Katty Kay in Washington

A reminder of our top story: Has Donald Trump

In his first speech to Congress, he repeated many of his key

pledges on security, immigration, trade and tax.

But there are still questions on how will it be paid for.

And coming up - we'll hear more from the former head of the US Fed

about why he thinks Brexit will be bad for the UK economy.

Well, of course one of the hallmark issues of Donald Trump's presidency

so far has been immigration, and securing America's borders.

And during his Presidential address, he said that the United States "must

restore the rule of law" at its borders.

Well let's speak to Michael Chertoff - he's the former secretary

of Homeland Security and now Executive Chairman

Thanks for coming in. Let's talk about their immigration ban. It has

been stalled in the courts, the White House is working on a new one.

In your experience, how useful has that been in terms of American

national security or not useful? I do think it's worth periodically

taking a look at our Visa screening system to make sure we are

adequately capturing the information we need to keep out dangerous people

without restriction things. I think it is worthwhile taking a second

look at this. It is the first try had some legal problems and perhaps

was overbroad, I think they are looking at a much more narrowly

sculpted and much more sensible ban on the idea really is not to stop

travel altogether but to make sure you are identifying those locations

where there is a higher risk and then have these are vetting process

that captures those risks. There has been some criticism that this is a

targeted news limbs and if you add that to some of the language of the

president has use, -- Muslims. They repeated phrase of radical Islamic

terrorism. We had it last night. Is this something that could come back

to haunt America? That it is not worth taking this as a war against

Islam is that the president seems to be doing. It is clear we do not want

to see this as a war against Islam or suggest that Muslims almost

Muslims or the Islamic religion itself is a problem. We do have to

recognise that there is an ideology that claims the Islamic mantle that

is supporting a lot of terrorist activities we see in the region and

in Europe and elsewhere. And not to acknowledge that runs the risk I

think are bending over backwards. When I go to the region and I've

been in the region and I say how do you describe the terrace, they say

we call them jihadi 's or extremists in Glamis. Even people from the

region of the Arab world use that terminology and I think we have to

be realistic about it. Question. The language is important. If you look

at the section on immigration in the speech, it was one of the darkest

part of it because he talks about an environment of lawless chaos when he

is referring to immigrants and he talks about the vast majority of

those convicted of terror crimes are foreign-born which is not true if

you look at the evidence. Are you worried at all bad it is that kind

of language that is going to great more problems down the line? I think

the rhetoric does get a little overheated and that runs the risk of

first overly alarming the American people and secondly intimidating and

alienating people in the Muslim community in the US who are loyal

Americans. But again the basic point that we need to have an adequate

process for screening people from overseas who want to come to the US,

I think it is a fair point and even after 911, we had to do an enormous

amount of re-engineering our travel screening progress to keep that the

kind of operatives we saw on September the 11th. The extreme

vetting that you are talking about will be in this new travel order

which we expect sometime this week. What would you consider is that

extreme vetting if there was such a thing? What is fair for people

coming through American airports? I think if people are particularly

people who come from the Beazer waiver programme and if they have

travelled to one of those areas that Congress identified as areas where

there are currently terrace combat going on, it is fair to have these

people perhaps get a Visa in advance or get pulled aside and question

about what they were doing there and why. As you know in Britain, the

issue of foreign fighters, Europeans who go to Syria or other up to fight

with Isis is the increasing concern for security officials around the

world. I must ask you before you go, in 2016, you were a signatory along

with 50 other national security figures to a letter in which he said

that President Trump would be the most reckless president in American

history. Do you still agree with that? I think the president has made

some good appointments in his security area. I think we have to

withhold judgment. I would love to be proved wrong. You still have

concerns. I want to see how the policy develops. We are early in the

presidency. He has made good appointments. I will see what the

new travel order says. We saw the president recommit yesterday to

Nato. As he take the steps, I would love to be able to say I miss judged

it, I am happy to say he is doing a good job. We will get you back in.

Thank you for joining us. More now from that interview you did

earlier today with Former US Federal Federal Reserve Chairnan Alan

Greenspan. Katty Yes, I also spoke to him

about the prospects for the eurozone How liable do you think Greece's

position in the Eurozone is? I have been forecasting four years that

they would drop out or be forced out of the Eurozone and the reason to

remember is that they got into the Europe Gale Eurozone under false

pretences. Ultimately it has been Germany which has supported them,

directly and indirectly. It is going to be a very interesting question

about how long you can go on. It is an unstable economic system, it is a

small economy. It is doing more damage to the structure of the euro

than anything else but until that is resolved on my thought is that to

resolve it is to detach Greece from the Eurozone. But no one listens to

me. You sound surprisingly pessimistic. I found that way

because I am. At least I hope by some that way. Is there a scenario

in which Brexit could be good for the British economy but not good for

the European economy? I would be hard-pressed to find an example of

that. Brexit in my view has been bad or will be bad for the British

economy. Brexit is essentially, you know, it's American populism. I'm

convinced that when some of the number of the people start moving

out of London, and they are going through the motions down, that a new

photo, in a different direction. Alan Greenspan that. Brexit is Latin

American populism. What are you hearing on your side of the

Atlantic? I think people are quite pessimistic about Greece and

possibly Italy as well. We had a guest in the studio the other day

and he was making the point that the situation with Greece at the moment

is untenable unless somebody cuts the depth and at the moment there

doesn't seem to be any sign of that because Germany of course is heading

into an election and Germany is one of the biggest creditors. The

Americans are very frustrated about this, we heard from President

Trump's trade adviser speaking just last month saying Germany is keeping

the euro artificially low by keeping countries like Greece on board.

There are plenty people in America who would like Greece to be cut

loose the weaker countries can drift away and the euro becomes stronger

and therefore there would be a more equitable trading partnership

between Europe and the United States. It is interesting, a lot of

the people talking at the moment about Greece. Mr Trump clearly a

supporter of Brexit but not everyone here in Washington still the same as

the president does. Clearly the former chairman thinks differently.

Some of the day's other key developments:

investigation into the battle for Aleppo in Syria has

concluded that both sides were guilty of war crimes.

The report focuses on fighting last year, and says the Syrian air force

carried out an attack on a UN aid convoy.

Rebels are said to have used civilians as human shields.

More than a thousand jobs are thought to be at risk

at the car maker Ford, at its engine plant

The company revealed concerns about a slowdown in work in a leaked

Ford won't comment on the document, but says it "fully understands"

Two women have been charged with the murder of the half-brother

They face the death penalty if found guilty.

Malaysian police believe they wiped the deadly nerve agent "VX"

on Kim Jong Nam's face in Kuala Lumpur airport just

The women claim they thought they were taking part in a video prank.

Europe's most active volcano has erupted in a fiery show of lava.

Mount Etna, on the Italian island of Sicily, has been largely dormant

The volcano's latest eruptions began on Monday.

Authorities say there's no danger to nearby towns.

Etna's eruptions can last days or even weeks -

It was pretty spectacular. Do not get too close. Shall we take a quick

look at President Trump rehearsing last night? Here he is in the back

of his car. I do this before some of my performances. I like to get the

head movement in. Like that, a bit of that.

What do you think? I do this when I'm about to tell the children. She

was quite into that. Her daughter had written part of that speech

according to you, no doubt she was very congratulatory. There is

something serious about that, there is the president wanting to get this

right and you have to think that somebody in the oval office got him

and said what we are doing so far is not working in terms of broadening

our appeal. The Bay still loves us but we are not reaching other people

and we are getting hammered in terms of review of how we are presenting

cell. The president himself gave himself a C for communication. That

is the president doing what it takes to improve that C grade and he has

succeeded in doing so. Will he now go back to the office today?

Apparently they are going to rolled out his travel order today but they

have postponed it because they are basking in the glory of everything

that has happened, some say. Quite right too, it was a good performance

by all accounts. It is all starting to sound remarkably like a normal

presidency, isn't it? Traditional and sober. Yes. Let's see how long

it lasted and when he gets back his little device and starts tweeting

again. That is the big question. John said it at the beginning of

this programme, how long does the last? Which is the real deal more

Trump? The one we saw last night, discipline, sober, acting like

President, being a president or is it the one who is thin-skinned and

attacked his critics and doesn't like any form of criticism? You the

presidential fingers twitching, do you? I think its aims are keeping

his device away from him. That his aides.

That is One Hundred Days for now - my colleagues Laura Trevelyan

and Anthony Zurcher will be taking your questions

So do get in touch with your thoughts.

For now though, from Katty Kay in Washington,

and me Christian Fraser in London - goodbye.