Browse content similar to 22/11/2012. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Afternoon folks. Welcome to the Daily Politics. It's show time in | :00:39. | :00:44. | |
Brussels. Can David Cameron win a freeze in the European budget which | :00:44. | :00:48. | |
his eurosceptic party will buy? We'll have the latest from the EU | :00:48. | :00:54. | |
capital and debate his chances with politicians from across Europe. | :00:54. | :00:56. | |
As the Justice Secretary unveils options for allowing prisoners the | :00:56. | :00:59. | |
vote, has the Government gone far enough to satisfy the European | :00:59. | :01:04. | |
Court of Human Rights. Are they even right to try? | :01:04. | :01:07. | |
It's 70 years since this man launched a report that changed | :01:07. | :01:10. | |
Britain for ever. But would father of the welfare state William | :01:10. | :01:14. | |
Beveridge be spinning in his grave if he could see the state of | :01:14. | :01:20. | |
welfare today? And ahead of Dave's big day in | :01:20. | :01:30. | |
:01:30. | :01:33. | ||
Europe, we uncover the real man All that in the next hour. With us | :01:33. | :01:35. | |
for the duration, James O'Shaughnessy, former policy | :01:35. | :01:38. | |
adviser to David Cameron, currently working on a new chain of academies | :01:38. | :01:48. | |
:01:48. | :01:51. | ||
with Wellington Public School. More of that later. But first, the BBC | :01:51. | :01:55. | |
News channel have reported that Tony Hall has been appointed the | :01:55. | :02:00. | |
new director general of the BBC. I was always in favour of Tony Hall, | :02:00. | :02:05. | |
of course, and supported him from the start, even when he wasn't in | :02:05. | :02:11. | |
line for the job! He was barely out of his pram when I said he should | :02:11. | :02:15. | |
be the DG of the BBC! He is the former head of BBC News, so he is | :02:15. | :02:19. | |
not a new kid on the block, but for a long while he has been chief | :02:19. | :02:23. | |
executive of the Royal Opera House. So a lot of sitting on our | :02:23. | :02:30. | |
programme of from now on. He succeeds George Entwistle, who | :02:30. | :02:37. | |
lasted only 55 days in the post. I assume that he will last longer. | :02:37. | :02:42. | |
Chris Patten has found a replacement, and kind of gone | :02:42. | :02:45. | |
outside, going outside the existing hierarchy to bring somebody Baku | :02:46. | :02:51. | |
used to be in the hierarchy. It is very BBC that it is somebody who is | :02:51. | :02:57. | |
currently outside the BBC... Clearly he has gone out and got his | :02:57. | :03:01. | |
man, Tony Hall was not an original applicant for the job. | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
understanding is he did not apply for the job in the round that Mr | :03:05. | :03:10. | |
Entwistle won. So they have gone out and recruited somebody quickly, | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
which I'm sure is a good thing for the stability of the BBC. I guess | :03:15. | :03:20. | |
Chris Patten thought, I need to get somebody out with the current | :03:20. | :03:25. | |
structure, but I also need somebody who does know a bit about the BBC. | :03:25. | :03:30. | |
It is still a managerial leadership position and you're still editor in | :03:30. | :03:36. | |
chief. In Tony Hall, they are hoping they have found somebody who | :03:37. | :03:41. | |
has got credibility on both fronts. He has done a great job as a | :03:41. | :03:46. | |
journalist and also running the Royal Opera House. Are you | :03:46. | :03:53. | |
available to be the new boss of the Royal Opera House? Not yet! | :03:53. | :04:00. | |
Anywhere, there we go, Tony all is the new director general of the BBC. | :04:00. | :04:03. | |
It's show time in Brussels. David Cameron arrived there this morning | :04:03. | :04:07. | |
looking for allies to freeze the EU budget for the next seven years at | :04:07. | :04:11. | |
its current level. There are those other than Britain who also want a | :04:11. | :04:14. | |
real-terms freeze, as the jargon has it. But many more want an | :04:14. | :04:17. | |
increase, especially those who do well out of Brussels largesse. | :04:17. | :04:20. | |
There is already talk of compromise but the Prime Minister is still | :04:20. | :04:27. | |
talking tough. I am not happy at all. These are | :04:27. | :04:30. | |
important negotiations, at a time and we are making difficult | :04:30. | :04:34. | |
decisions at home over public spending, it is quite wrong for | :04:34. | :04:38. | |
there to beat proposals for this increased extra spending in the EU. | :04:38. | :04:43. | |
So we will be negotiating very hard for a good deal for Britain's | :04:43. | :04:50. | |
taxpayers and to keep the British rebate. They always say that sort | :04:50. | :04:54. | |
of thing when they arrive. I wonder what he is going to say when he | :04:54. | :05:01. | |
leaves. Let's go to the man who knows! Mark a card for us. Where | :05:01. | :05:11. | |
are we in this Budget process? are involved in here, with a day of | :05:11. | :05:16. | |
bilateral, conversations between government leaders between the | :05:16. | :05:20. | |
president of the council and President Barroso. First up was | :05:20. | :05:24. | |
President -- David Cameron, who was supposed to go in there and present | :05:25. | :05:30. | |
his position for 15 minutes. He was in there for 35 minutes. He was | :05:30. | :05:34. | |
first up because Britain it is still seen as key. If you can | :05:34. | :05:39. | |
strike a deal with the British, perhaps you will get others on side. | :05:39. | :05:44. | |
Afterwards, we are hearing there is a long way to go. I should say that | :05:44. | :05:48. | |
the president of the council thinks he has moved a long way towards the | :05:48. | :05:52. | |
British position. His people are going around saying that what they | :05:52. | :05:56. | |
have on the table already amounts to a cut. The British are saying, | :05:56. | :06:00. | |
not so fast, they want a further reduction. That deal would also | :06:00. | :06:04. | |
involve some reduction in the British rebate, and as far as the | :06:04. | :06:12. | |
British are concerned, that is non- negotiable. Tell me this, if Mr | :06:12. | :06:16. | |
Cameron is sticking to his line in the sand, which is a real-terms | :06:16. | :06:20. | |
freeze, I know other countries do not want much of an increase or any | :06:20. | :06:25. | |
increase in the Budget. But is there anybody in the EU feeling as | :06:25. | :06:33. | |
strongly as Britain about a real- terms freeze, and no further? | :06:33. | :06:37. | |
think there are people who feel as strongly as the British, that | :06:37. | :06:41. | |
spending needs to be reined in. Whether they go as far as the | :06:41. | :06:44. | |
British, whether they would be prepared to use their veto, we | :06:44. | :06:49. | |
don't know. But certainly, the Swedish, the Dutch, they are | :06:49. | :06:55. | |
equally adamant that there has to be a freeze, or at least a large | :06:55. | :06:58. | |
reduction in EU spending. What we don't know is whether they are | :06:58. | :07:03. | |
prepared to compromise. The attitude here is that the British | :07:03. | :07:05. | |
position is understandable, but most other countries come here, | :07:05. | :07:09. | |
laying out their position beforehand, and then they | :07:09. | :07:13. | |
compromise. The feeling here is that David Cameron has boxed | :07:13. | :07:17. | |
himself into a corner. He has said, this is what we want, we will use | :07:17. | :07:22. | |
our veto if necessary, but now he is here, he will come under great | :07:22. | :07:26. | |
pressure to compromise. Some of those natural allies he has got to | :07:26. | :07:29. | |
have signalled they might be prepared to compromise more than | :07:29. | :07:33. | |
the British. You have got a long day ahead of you! Thank you for | :07:33. | :07:40. | |
joining us. What he has said I think is right, that the | :07:40. | :07:45. | |
negotiating position of the British Prime Minister is also the position | :07:45. | :07:50. | |
he must negotiate, he hasn't got much room to compromise. Not at all. | :07:50. | :07:54. | |
Coming off the back of the vote in the House of Commons, which pushed | :07:54. | :08:00. | |
for a stronger position, more of a cut, I don't think he has room to | :08:00. | :08:03. | |
compromise, I don't dig he wants to. He has been clear and consistent | :08:03. | :08:07. | |
throughout, which is to keep the rebate and push for real-terms | :08:07. | :08:12. | |
freeze. The other thing to bear in mind is that this isn't the last | :08:12. | :08:19. | |
point at which a position can be made. Brinkmanship is the classic | :08:19. | :08:24. | |
work in Europe. They can have this meeting and find another option, it | :08:24. | :08:28. | |
is likely that nothing will happen this time around. You have worked | :08:28. | :08:32. | |
with the Prime Minister. There are some Tory backbenchers are now | :08:32. | :08:38. | |
questioning his Eurosceptic credentials. In your view how Euro- | :08:38. | :08:42. | |
sceptic is he? A I think he is a Euro-sceptic, not to the extent of | :08:42. | :08:46. | |
some people in the party, who want to leave. He wants to see a | :08:46. | :08:49. | |
reformed Europe, he thinks our place is in a reformed Europe, that | :08:49. | :08:54. | |
is the message he is taking. I think it is extraordinary to be | :08:54. | :08:58. | |
thinking of adding 100 billion extra Euros, at a time when every | :08:58. | :09:04. | |
single government of the 27 is cutting costs, it does seem an | :09:04. | :09:09. | |
extraordinary proposition. We will see what happens. They will be | :09:09. | :09:17. | |
burning the midnight oil! 3 SERPS, that is what they call it. -- three | :09:17. | :09:20. | |
shirts. Now, David Cameron says the | :09:21. | :09:23. | |
prospect of giving prisoners the vote makes him "physically ill" - | :09:23. | :09:27. | |
but legislation to be announced later today could do exactly that. | :09:27. | :09:30. | |
The issue of giving prisoners the vote has been a problem for British | :09:30. | :09:32. | |
governments of all persuasions since the European Court of Human | :09:33. | :09:41. | |
Rights first ruled in 2004 that a In February, MPs voted by 234 to 22 | :09:41. | :09:44. | |
to keep the ban, in response to a proposal to give the vote to | :09:44. | :09:54. | |
offenders sentenced to a custodial sentence of less than four years. | :09:54. | :09:56. | |
The government indicated it would respect Parliament's wishes by | :09:56. | :10:06. | |
:10:06. | :10:08. | ||
doing the minimum needed to comply. 4pm tomorrow is the deadline for | :10:08. | :10:15. | |
Britain to respond to the court's latest order on the issue. So it is | :10:15. | :10:17. | |
expected that this afternoon the Justice Secretary Chris Grayling | :10:17. | :10:22. | |
will publish a draft Bill with offering MPs a range of options: | :10:22. | :10:25. | |
Votes for prisoners imprisoned for up to four years, for up to six | :10:25. | :10:35. | |
:10:35. | :10:42. | ||
It is that blanket ban that annoys the European Court of. I'm now | :10:42. | :10:45. | |
joined by the Conservative MP Dominic Raab, and the Director of | :10:45. | :10:55. | |
:10:55. | :10:56. | ||
the campaign Liberty, Shami Chakrabarti. Dominic Raab, let me | :10:56. | :11:02. | |
come to you first. I just want to get the policy here. A spokesman | :11:02. | :11:06. | |
for the Prime Minister said yesterday, "if people go to prison, | :11:06. | :11:12. | |
they lose the right to vote, that is our policy." but today the | :11:12. | :11:15. | |
government is introducing legislation that could change that | :11:15. | :11:19. | |
policy, so what is the policy? think the policy is that ultimately | :11:19. | :11:23. | |
the Prime Minister and the President of the Supreme Court have | :11:23. | :11:29. | |
also made his point, it is for Parliament to make these decisions. | :11:29. | :11:32. | |
There is a feeling this is being punted into the long grass. | :11:32. | :11:37. | |
Ultimately parliament will have to decide between the range of options. | :11:37. | :11:41. | |
I thought the government policy was that there should be no vote for | :11:41. | :11:47. | |
prisoners. Since when did you have a policy when you offered an | :11:47. | :11:51. | |
alternative to the policy? It is a reasonable point. Constitutionally, | :11:51. | :11:54. | |
the answer is that the Prime Minister wants to allow Parliament | :11:54. | :11:59. | |
to decide because ultimately it is for elected lawmakers to make the | :11:59. | :12:04. | |
law of the land. It is clear that Prime Minister does not want to | :12:04. | :12:12. | |
overturn the current band. Parliament but the way you did, -- | :12:12. | :12:17. | |
votes the way you did, what will you do? I think what will happen is | :12:17. | :12:21. | |
the case will go back to the Strasbourg court, it will remain an | :12:21. | :12:26. | |
and implemented ruling. It will go to the committee of ministers, who | :12:26. | :12:30. | |
have been calling on Strasbourg to medal are less. There is no | :12:30. | :12:33. | |
realistic chance of being kicked out of the Council of Europe, the | :12:33. | :12:38. | |
worst we will get is a polite diplomatic rap on the knuckles. | :12:38. | :12:44. | |
is very depressing to hear Dominic talking about flouting a court | :12:44. | :12:47. | |
order. Because that is what we're talking about. Whether it is an | :12:47. | :12:51. | |
international court, the local magistrates' court, identical | :12:51. | :12:55. | |
majesty's government should pick and choose which court judgments to | :12:55. | :13:00. | |
obey. Why should a kid I council estate obey the ASBO of the local | :13:00. | :13:05. | |
magistrate if her Majesty's government want a baby this? There | :13:05. | :13:12. | |
is so much room for manoeuvre. do you think should happen? | :13:12. | :13:17. | |
personally support boats for all prisoners, because I don't know how | :13:17. | :13:23. | |
you rehabilitate prisoners by saying they cannot vote. But the | :13:23. | :13:27. | |
point is not now about prisoner voting any more, it is about | :13:27. | :13:30. | |
whether we believe in the rule of law. I think the doublet to say, we | :13:30. | :13:34. | |
will just ignore the court and we will not get kicked out of the | :13:34. | :13:39. | |
Council of Europe, we might get kicked out one day. In the meantime, | :13:39. | :13:44. | |
what kind of signal to we sent to Vladimir Putin... Do you think he | :13:44. | :13:51. | |
is watching this? The Russian court floods that all the time. So this | :13:51. | :13:58. | |
is the signal we are sending, it doesn't matter. My point to you is | :13:58. | :14:02. | |
that we have never flattered the court before. The Russians have | :14:02. | :14:09. | |
flouted it regularly, they are the biggest at doing that. Why would | :14:09. | :14:15. | |
hours make any difference? I think that... I have heard in the past, | :14:15. | :14:19. | |
in the days of Mr Blair, wanting to lock people up for 90 days, lock | :14:20. | :14:24. | |
them up indefinitely without charge or trial, I heard Robert Mugabe's | :14:24. | :14:31. | |
ministers saying, if you can do it in Britain, we can do it. It gives | :14:31. | :14:34. | |
people a credibility that they do not deserve a for flouting | :14:34. | :14:40. | |
international law. I think the point she is making his it is the | :14:40. | :14:45. | |
job by ministers, they are bound to obey court rulings. You might not | :14:45. | :14:48. | |
like the court ruling, made you shouldn't have signed up to it in | :14:48. | :14:52. | |
the first place. You might not like the way it is going, but that is | :14:52. | :15:02. | |
:15:02. | :15:09. | ||
It is precisely not what we signed up to. There is a big it issue. We | :15:09. | :15:17. | |
can talk about prisoner voting. -- a big debt issue. What happens when | :15:17. | :15:23. | |
you have this tribunal expanding? That is a legislative function. | :15:23. | :15:28. | |
That is the attack on democracy. You cannot have democracy without | :15:28. | :15:35. | |
the rule of law. Sometimes you need independent referees. This is now | :15:35. | :15:41. | |
like the Supreme Court in America was in the 1960s. It is an activist | :15:41. | :15:46. | |
court. It is making up its own rulings. There is no right to | :15:46. | :15:51. | |
universal suffrage in the Convention of Human Rights. There | :15:51. | :15:55. | |
is a right to participate in free elections. What the court rejected | :15:55. | :16:04. | |
was a Victorian, blanket ban on prisoner voting. Convicted | :16:04. | :16:14. | |
:16:14. | :16:15. | ||
prisoners. There is no blanket ban. You had your say, now it is my turn. | :16:15. | :16:20. | |
I happen to believe in all prisoners voting. The court | :16:20. | :16:24. | |
judgment could be implemented by something much more subtle and | :16:24. | :16:28. | |
minimalist than that. Sometimes you do need to meet another institution | :16:28. | :16:34. | |
halfway to keep democracy alive. you go to prison in this country, | :16:34. | :16:38. | |
there is a blanket ban. If you are imprisoned for contempt of court | :16:38. | :16:47. | |
boy fine default, you can vote. -- or a fine default. The point is, | :16:47. | :16:57. | |
:16:57. | :16:59. | ||
there are lots of common sense compromise ways... Given that you | :16:59. | :17:03. | |
are in favour of all prisoners getting the vote, what would the | :17:03. | :17:09. | |
compromise be? The minimalist option offered in this Bill is that | :17:09. | :17:14. | |
prisoners in for less than four months of... Six months, I think. | :17:14. | :17:20. | |
Or people about to be released. Instead of having a fight with the | :17:20. | :17:30. | |
:17:30. | :17:31. | ||
European Court, we wrote the convention largely, why don't we | :17:31. | :17:38. | |
just agreed to six months? For most prisoners, there won't be an | :17:38. | :17:44. | |
election in that time. People are about to be released from prison. | :17:44. | :17:48. | |
The first point is, the six-month option would mean 5000 convicted | :17:48. | :17:53. | |
criminals at least notionally getting the right to vote them in - | :17:53. | :17:57. | |
- including many sexual offenders, violent offenders and homicide | :17:57. | :18:04. | |
offenders. Many people would have a problem with that. She seems to | :18:04. | :18:09. | |
think we are in a diplomatic haggle with the Strasbourg court. That is | :18:09. | :18:17. | |
contrary to the rule of law. Either they are right or they are wrong. | :18:17. | :18:24. | |
It is not applying the convention. Should you not come out? I support | :18:24. | :18:31. | |
the convention. That is a nonsense position. When Britain signed up to | :18:31. | :18:35. | |
the convention, we punted it 15 years later before we signed up to | :18:35. | :18:41. | |
the court. There were huge concerns about the court. Have laws without | :18:41. | :18:47. | |
a court to enforce them. That is an excellent position. The vast | :18:47. | :18:50. | |
majority of international human rights conventions do not have a | :18:50. | :18:53. | |
body enforcing them. I think the Supreme Court should have the last | :18:53. | :18:58. | |
word on this. They said prisoner should not have a vote. What is the | :18:58. | :19:02. | |
point in a British Supreme Court but does not have the last per -- | :19:02. | :19:07. | |
the last word? Do we sometimes listen to judgments with which we | :19:07. | :19:15. | |
disagree? You have to do that as a citizen and a politician. It seems | :19:15. | :19:22. | |
there is civil war going on. There is a way important point about | :19:22. | :19:25. | |
sovereignty. It's the European Court has said this needs to happen, | :19:25. | :19:30. | |
if a parliament is not prepared to pass anything and the Government is | :19:30. | :19:35. | |
not prepared to do anything, how can anything happen? This is the | :19:35. | :19:43. | |
crucial point. We made the European -- the European Court superior to | :19:43. | :19:46. | |
Parliament. We said the European Court could judge the actions of | :19:46. | :19:52. | |
the British Parliament against the principles embodied in the | :19:53. | :19:59. | |
convention. We signed up to the convention. It requires a | :19:59. | :20:03. | |
Parliament to make policy. About the Supreme Court in the US, there | :20:04. | :20:09. | |
is a massive danger when High Court make rulings - policy decisions - | :20:09. | :20:13. | |
without proper debate in a parliamentary democracy, in that | :20:13. | :20:19. | |
kind of forum. That creates a culture. You are still seeing that | :20:19. | :20:23. | |
ridden in American politics. My danger is you get big policy | :20:23. | :20:29. | |
decisions made by judges who are not accountable, rather than | :20:29. | :20:36. | |
politicians. That erodes trust in politics. We will come back to this. | :20:36. | :20:42. | |
So, talking of Strasbourg, our very own Jo Coburn is there today. Why, | :20:42. | :20:49. | |
you may ask? Well, it's that time when those crazy MEPs leave | :20:49. | :20:53. | |
Brussels for a few days and head to the capital of Alsace at a cost of | :20:53. | :21:01. | |
180 million euros a year. Who better to ask about David Cameron's | :21:01. | :21:04. | |
attempt to trim the EU budget than Members of the European Parliament | :21:04. | :21:14. | |
:21:14. | :21:16. | ||
who will, after all, have to agree any deal. Here's Jo. Negotiations | :21:16. | :21:20. | |
are under way. The bargaining in Brussels between the European Union | :21:20. | :21:25. | |
leaders. Even if they do agree a budget deal, and that is a big if, | :21:25. | :21:30. | |
it has to be approved by Members of the European Parliament here in | :21:30. | :21:34. | |
Strasbourg. The signs so far have not been great. With me to discuss | :21:34. | :21:44. | |
:21:44. | :21:47. | ||
the prospects of success, are three MEPs. Richard, let's kick-off. What | :21:47. | :21:53. | |
do you think the chances of success on a budget deal? 50/50. Is that | :21:53. | :22:00. | |
better? Has had improved over the last few weeks? It is normal for | :22:00. | :22:05. | |
negotiations at this stage. You will note that different parties, | :22:05. | :22:09. | |
different countries are coming from very widely differing positions. | :22:09. | :22:13. | |
There is a certain amount of grandstanding. We'll know we have | :22:13. | :22:17. | |
to reach compromise at some stage. Will we reach it this time? | :22:17. | :22:23. | |
Probably not. Sooner or later, we well. Are you are as optimistic for | :22:23. | :22:31. | |
a deal over the next few days? not think so. Few countries are | :22:31. | :22:36. | |
extremely far away from a compromise. We have managed to come | :22:36. | :22:41. | |
together on different issues with different countries. Some countries | :22:41. | :22:47. | |
on the size of the Budget and some on social policy. Everyone has a | :22:47. | :22:51. | |
piece of cake. If they are wise enough to bring together a | :22:51. | :22:55. | |
compromise career that would be excellent but I doubt it. Do you | :22:55. | :23:05. | |
:23:05. | :23:07. | ||
doubt it? It will be very difficult. I think around 55%. He has said | :23:07. | :23:12. | |
that everyone must compromise. If that is the case, all governments | :23:12. | :23:17. | |
are ready to negotiate and find a compromise so we can come to a | :23:17. | :23:20. | |
result. Do you think David Cameron will compromise in the sense that | :23:20. | :23:25. | |
he will not necessarily stick to the real-terms freeze that he wants | :23:25. | :23:32. | |
- that he will pay more? Some things are clearly defined. The | :23:32. | :23:36. | |
United Kingdom is going to extreme lengths to deal with the budget | :23:36. | :23:44. | |
deficit. People genuinely understand that. He will be | :23:44. | :23:46. | |
explaining to other colleagues of European nations that we are having | :23:46. | :23:52. | |
to lay-off nurses, policemen, give redundancy notices to soldiers and, | :23:52. | :23:56. | |
at a time, when we're going to turn round and ask for more money for | :23:57. | :24:01. | |
Europe. That is not acceptable. is that the red line in the sand? | :24:01. | :24:06. | |
It is one area we will be negotiating hard fall. It is a | :24:06. | :24:10. | |
multi-faceted thing and there are many angles to look at. He will not | :24:10. | :24:15. | |
move on that. What is wrong with national governments same, we were | :24:15. | :24:19. | |
not agree with increased spending in the EU when we're cutting | :24:19. | :24:26. | |
budgets at home? It is about freezing spending. The British | :24:26. | :24:32. | |
government wants to freeze them at some accounting figure. Free | :24:32. | :24:36. | |
something that you have. Do not freeze something that does not | :24:36. | :24:40. | |
exist any more. If we keep these levels until 2020, that is one | :24:40. | :24:44. | |
thing. The problem will be that the European Union were not be able to | :24:44. | :24:50. | |
achieve the political commitments in the same way it could. The | :24:50. | :24:56. | |
budget is an instrument that is not the purpose. Britain is not going | :24:56. | :25:00. | |
to get what it once was dug it can have a starting level but it will | :25:00. | :25:05. | |
have to agree to something above a real-terms freeze. If I hope we're | :25:05. | :25:10. | |
not getting too hung up on the figures. If you look at Britain and | :25:10. | :25:15. | |
Germany, the difference is not great. It is about how you spend | :25:16. | :25:20. | |
the money when you have got it. Priorities need to change to | :25:20. | :25:25. | |
reflect the times we are in. Germany also wants the overall | :25:25. | :25:28. | |
spending to come down. David Cameron and Angela Merkel wants the | :25:28. | :25:37. | |
money to come down. We do like a freeze? The European Union has | :25:37. | :25:42. | |
competences to fulfil. It has won new country, Croatia. A freeze | :25:43. | :25:48. | |
would mean a decrease, in fact, because of these reasons. This has | :25:48. | :25:52. | |
to be taken into account to come to a fair result. We should meet | :25:52. | :25:59. | |
somewhere in the middle. Everyone has to move. Also the European | :25:59. | :26:05. | |
Parliament needs to compromise. It means everyone has to move. Then we | :26:05. | :26:11. | |
will make it will start to say we're not just cut, become to | :26:11. | :26:15. | |
research, innovation questions, all those questions. That would be the | :26:15. | :26:19. | |
easiest way. The problem for the UK government is the pressure David | :26:19. | :26:25. | |
Cameron is under from his own party. Is the Conservative Party move into | :26:25. | :26:30. | |
a position of better off out? would not think so. That is extreme | :26:30. | :26:35. | |
territory to get yourself into. We have a clear message that we want | :26:35. | :26:39. | |
to be in the European Union but we think spending priorities need to | :26:39. | :26:44. | |
change. They need to take drastic action to restore the health of the | :26:44. | :26:49. | |
euros. The recognise the steps they have to take. They are not going | :26:49. | :26:54. | |
down that road. The world out there is changing around. If Europe wants | :26:54. | :27:00. | |
to fall behind, that is something we wish to avoid. Many in the | :27:00. | :27:04. | |
Conservative Party to support that view. Just recently in a vote in | :27:04. | :27:08. | |
Parliament, many rebels sided with the idea of a cut in the Budget. | :27:08. | :27:13. | |
Many think the relationship with Europe has to change. That is what | :27:13. | :27:17. | |
the Prime Minister is saying. He has talked about a review of | :27:17. | :27:22. | |
competencies and taking a hard line on the Budget. Do you think the UK | :27:22. | :27:30. | |
is heading towards the exit door? The UK would not like to keep the | :27:30. | :27:36. | |
budget - that is the decrees. This is the structure of the Budget. The | :27:36. | :27:40. | |
UK veto will come because that budget is not well-structured and | :27:40. | :27:50. | |
:27:50. | :27:52. | ||
the spending is not well directed. Just to say, for the EU expanding, | :27:52. | :27:56. | |
this is 0.827 % of public expenditure. You will not save much | :27:56. | :28:00. | |
money out of that. More than half the exports would go to the single | :28:00. | :28:04. | |
market in Europe. The benefits are much larger than that. I would | :28:04. | :28:10. | |
think twice. The way of spending is extremely important. We need to | :28:10. | :28:15. | |
have the amounts for filling the policies. From the perspective of | :28:15. | :28:19. | |
Germany, do you think the UK is heading out of the European Union - | :28:19. | :28:25. | |
may be slowly - but that is the way they are heading? You always | :28:25. | :28:30. | |
admired the British ability to be practical. I do not believe the | :28:30. | :28:33. | |
minority in the Tory Party would win. We would like to have Britain | :28:33. | :28:39. | |
in four lots of reasons. The place of Britain is in Europe and cities | :28:39. | :28:43. | |
in the interests of Britain to be in Europe. Thank you very much. | :28:43. | :28:51. | |
There was see how negotiations go over the next 36 hours. -- we will | :28:51. | :28:55. | |
see. So, it's a big day for David Cameron but, after two and half | :28:55. | :28:58. | |
years in the top job, how well do we really know the man himself? | :28:58. | :29:01. | |
James O'Shaugnessy worked closely with the Prime Minister, first in | :29:01. | :29:04. | |
Opposition then in then in Government. Before we ask him for | :29:04. | :29:07. | |
his perspective on Cameron the man, here's Giles, who's been taking his | :29:07. | :29:10. | |
own soundings. When you aspire to be, and then become Prime Minister, | :29:10. | :29:14. | |
people ask, and probably have a right to ask who you are as a | :29:14. | :29:17. | |
person. David Cameron hasn't been shy, early on we were invited to | :29:17. | :29:19. | |
see him behind the scenes, but actually such insights are | :29:19. | :29:26. | |
carefully managed. And it's his personality in so far as it shapes | :29:26. | :29:29. | |
how he does his job that's of real interest. Before the election he'd | :29:30. | :29:38. | |
explained his ambitions. I was there that night when David Cameron | :29:38. | :29:44. | |
was asked why he wanted to be Prime Minister. His response was, I think | :29:44. | :29:47. | |
there would be good at it. Critics say, the main point of what he's | :29:47. | :29:51. | |
doing is that he wants to be Prime Minister and he wants the job for | :29:52. | :29:55. | |
his own sake but he is not driven by a sense of mission of vision to | :29:55. | :30:02. | |
change the country and lead it in a particular direction. I think he | :30:02. | :30:07. | |
has that very English temperament about him that distrusts ideology. | :30:07. | :30:11. | |
He thinks ideas have their place. He would not be a politician if he | :30:11. | :30:16. | |
did not. He even distrust the harshness and absolutism of | :30:16. | :30:21. | |
political ideology. That might explain why many of his critics | :30:21. | :30:25. | |
have won the right of the party to fill their politics are forged from | :30:25. | :30:31. | |
heart and belief, it not strategy. He is not a deeply ideological | :30:31. | :30:35. | |
Thatcherite. He does have to deal with a coalition. He did have to | :30:35. | :30:41. | |
deal in the past with a hostile media environment. I do not blame | :30:41. | :30:47. | |
him for that. It got him into Number 10. He took with him a crowd | :30:47. | :30:51. | |
of people who have long been personally and professionally loyal. | :30:51. | :30:55. | |
One of the features of Cameron the man is that he tends to rely on | :30:55. | :31:01. | |
people he has known for a very long time. It is rare for an outsider to | :31:01. | :31:06. | |
be committed properly into the inner circle. Some people will see | :31:06. | :31:11. | |
that as a strength. Critics will say, if you want a Prime Minister | :31:11. | :31:15. | |
who is going to change things and get stuck in, he must sometimes be | :31:15. | :31:21. | |
prepared to fire his friends. David Cameron has never really done that. | :31:21. | :31:25. | |
I think Cameron is a man who does not suffer fools gladly. In my | :31:25. | :31:30. | |
experience, he was fair but firm as a boss. If people are not up to the | :31:30. | :31:35. | |
job, they won it pretty quickly. They say No. 10 reflects the | :31:35. | :31:39. | |
character of the person at the top. That seems very true of this PM | :31:39. | :31:43. | |
compared with other characters at the top of the party. Osborne likes | :31:43. | :31:49. | |
the clean, sharp, clinical operation. Boris like delegating to | :31:49. | :31:56. | |
people who he trusts. David Cameron does like a certain muddy mess - a | :31:56. | :32:01. | |
certain lack of definition - is certain relaxed quality in the | :32:01. | :32:05. | |
atmosphere. That seems to be part of he hears. Anyone's character can | :32:05. | :32:11. | |
be analysed for strength and weakness. Some traits can be either. | :32:11. | :32:15. | |
Nobody is perfect. It is just the stakes are much higher getting it | :32:15. | :32:25. | |
:32:25. | :32:27. | ||
Let's come into what is happening at the moment in Brussels. How good | :32:27. | :32:33. | |
is he at negotiating? How good are his negotiating skills? A think the | :32:33. | :32:37. | |
coalition, the fact of the coalition, stands as a pretty good | :32:37. | :32:41. | |
testament to those skills. He got what he wanted to get, which is to | :32:41. | :32:48. | |
become Prime Minister and to form a stable government. I think he gets | :32:48. | :32:54. | |
the kind of outcomes he wants. you foreseen that as an option, did | :32:54. | :32:58. | |
he have a game plan for that, is that what unfolded after the | :32:58. | :33:03. | |
election or did he make it up as he went along? I think there was a bit | :33:03. | :33:07. | |
of both. If he worked at the polls throughout the campaign, it never | :33:07. | :33:14. | |
looked like anybody would have a convincing majority. The Lib Dems | :33:14. | :33:18. | |
were doing things -- well during things like the leadership debates. | :33:18. | :33:22. | |
So clearly he was thinking of a what-if scenario, but you do not | :33:22. | :33:29. | |
know how things will pan out. Having seen the position as it was, | :33:29. | :33:34. | |
within 24 hours, he was making an open, comprehensive offered to the | :33:34. | :33:40. | |
Lib Dems, and it was on the morning of that Friday. By the Tuesday, | :33:40. | :33:45. | |
they were in government. In Europe, coalitions of can take weeks to | :33:45. | :33:49. | |
come together, so that was extraordinary. He is not good on | :33:49. | :33:55. | |
detail, say his critics. Very much not true. He has an incredible mind, | :33:55. | :33:59. | |
and superb judgment, which is why I always thought he would be a good | :33:59. | :34:04. | |
Prime Minister. He really does read all the briefs and is across the | :34:04. | :34:08. | |
details? John Major always said he was proud to be. This idea of him | :34:08. | :34:15. | |
slacking off is not true, he gets off -- get up incredibly early, he | :34:15. | :34:20. | |
is across there are things he needs to be. What he has is a willingness | :34:21. | :34:26. | |
to delegate to his cabinet ministers the broad bones of a | :34:26. | :34:32. | |
programme, and trust them to get on with it. He looks in on them from | :34:32. | :34:38. | |
time to time, where there are issues, he get deeply involved. | :34:38. | :34:42. | |
said to have a bit of a temper in private, have you seen the rough | :34:42. | :34:49. | |
end of that? I have never seen that. At the end, he doesn't really stand | :34:49. | :34:54. | |
for anything, he is a managerial Conservative, when asked why he | :34:54. | :34:58. | |
wanted to be Prime Minister, he didn't say because he wanted to | :34:58. | :35:02. | |
create world peace or alleviate the condition of the people, along | :35:02. | :35:06. | |
Disraeli lines, he said, I think I would be rather good at it. I am | :35:06. | :35:10. | |
not sure he would say that was a complete description of why he | :35:10. | :35:14. | |
wanted to be a Prime Minister, but I would say firstly, he is a | :35:14. | :35:17. | |
classic conservative, not an ideologist, but look at his | :35:17. | :35:23. | |
principles. Look at the stance he has taken on a gay marriage. One of | :35:23. | :35:26. | |
the first things he said when he was running for the leadership of | :35:26. | :35:30. | |
the Conservative Party was he believed in marriage for a man or | :35:30. | :35:36. | |
woman, or a woman and a woman ought to man. I think he is consistent on | :35:36. | :35:43. | |
the things he believes passionately in, and you have to judge him on | :35:43. | :35:47. | |
what the government does, he is overseeing a government which has | :35:47. | :35:53. | |
Ken Clarke in it, Iain Duncan Smith, William Hague, a huge range of | :35:53. | :35:58. | |
talent across the party, that no Prime Minister has managed to unite | :35:59. | :36:03. | |
for a long time. That is in itself an extraordinary achievement. They | :36:03. | :36:10. | |
are doing a lot of things history would judge as being pretty radical. | :36:10. | :36:17. | |
We have been joined by Mr -- viewers in Scotland. Our guest of | :36:17. | :36:21. | |
the day is setting up not just one or two academies, but a whole chain | :36:21. | :36:27. | |
of them, in conjunction with Wellington College. Before we hear | :36:27. | :36:32. | |
about that, and his academies only take place in England, not in | :36:32. | :36:36. | |
Scotland, let's recap on where we are with the government's flagship | :36:36. | :36:40. | |
education policy. According to the Department for Education there are | :36:40. | :36:45. | |
2,456 six academies open in England. The government says academies | :36:45. | :36:47. | |
benefit from greater freedoms that innovate and raise standards, | :36:47. | :36:56. | |
because they are free from local authority control. They can set | :36:56. | :36:59. | |
their own pay and conditions for staff, have freedoms around the | :36:59. | :37:02. | |
curriculum, as well as the ability to change the length of terms and | :37:02. | :37:07. | |
school days. Now successful academies are setting up sister | :37:07. | :37:12. | |
schools, creating so-called "chain academies". So far there are around | :37:12. | :37:16. | |
48 academy chains covering nearly 350 academies. Critics claim | :37:16. | :37:18. | |
academies are the privatisation of education, and that they benefit | :37:18. | :37:24. | |
more affluent neighbourhoods with the extra money they receive. And | :37:24. | :37:27. | |
today the National Audit Office has said a tenfold increase in the | :37:27. | :37:29. | |
number of schools converting to academies has resulted in �1 | :37:29. | :37:32. | |
billion of extra costs - which the Department for Education was | :37:32. | :37:42. | |
:37:42. | :37:46. | ||
unprepared for. Which I think is a polite way of saying it didn't have | :37:46. | :37:50. | |
the money! James O'Shaughnessy is in the process of setting up a | :37:50. | :37:56. | |
chain academy, and Alasdair Smith is from the Anti-Academies Alliance. | :37:56. | :38:02. | |
I think we know his position! Give me the case for academies. They | :38:02. | :38:08. | |
work, quite simply. The evidence we now seek for academy set up under | :38:08. | :38:13. | |
Labour, so-called sponsored academies, Gwent and they take over | :38:13. | :38:17. | |
failing school and improve it, they are on average perform better than | :38:17. | :38:22. | |
schools that didn't go down that route. And Labour idea that this | :38:22. | :38:28. | |
condition has picked up? Some work, some don't, that is the problem. It | :38:28. | :38:34. | |
is not about an average. Some have been very successful, but some | :38:34. | :38:38. | |
academies, the Basildon academies, these are academies in special | :38:38. | :38:42. | |
measures. There is nothing magic about academies or sponsorship, and | :38:42. | :38:47. | |
we have been sold a pass by both New Labour and the coalition that | :38:47. | :38:52. | |
there is some kind of magic dust, it doesn't exist. You point by | :38:52. | :38:56. | |
dismissing something on average, you cannot have a proper argument | :38:56. | :39:01. | |
about anecdotes. You need to add value it at type of programme in | :39:01. | :39:04. | |
all its forms and see that is more or less effective. It is true that | :39:04. | :39:08. | |
there are academies at haven't worked, no one would disagree but | :39:08. | :39:16. | |
that. Similarly, there are maintained schools that have done | :39:16. | :39:17. | |
brilliantly and some that hadn't worked. But the LSC did a review of | :39:17. | :39:21. | |
the sponsored academies that were set up under Labour and found that | :39:21. | :39:24. | |
not only were they are performing better than schools that hadn't | :39:24. | :39:28. | |
gone down that route, but they also brought benefits for neighbouring | :39:28. | :39:35. | |
schools. So there was a competition effect that raised... A so it is | :39:35. | :39:40. | |
really important not to say, they don't do a good job, but to | :39:40. | :39:43. | |
evaluate the programmes are crossed the range. You say that is what the | :39:43. | :39:49. | |
report says, it cannot identify... All the new Labour academies had | :39:49. | :39:54. | |
with than �30 million of new buildings, generous transitional | :39:54. | :39:57. | |
funding, changes in school leadership. It wasn't the academy | :39:57. | :40:01. | |
status, it was the bricks and mortar, the changing in teaching | :40:01. | :40:06. | |
and learning, in leadership. It is nothing about academy status. The | :40:06. | :40:10. | |
evidence is that the London challenge has been the most sister | :40:10. | :40:16. | |
-- successful form of school improvement, and much cheaper. So | :40:16. | :40:20. | |
I'm happy to acknowledge some academies have been successful, but | :40:20. | :40:24. | |
some of failing, and we can't tolerate that situation. We need to | :40:24. | :40:27. | |
look at the school improvement system that works for every school. | :40:27. | :40:32. | |
But quite a few comprehensives file, and we tolerate that. I don't think | :40:32. | :40:37. | |
we do. We tolerated that for the best part of 20, 30 years. It | :40:37. | :40:44. | |
wasn't until James Callaghan, in 1976, talked about the secret | :40:44. | :40:49. | |
garden speech, when the public have an interest in what is going on in | :40:49. | :40:53. | |
schools. What was going on then was appalling in many instances. No | :40:53. | :40:58. | |
attempt to do things like children the basics. The long march back in | :40:59. | :41:02. | |
favour of standards, that has happened under consecutive | :41:02. | :41:06. | |
governments, find its latest expression in the Academy movement. | :41:06. | :41:10. | |
The reason for that is in many cases, the secondary schools were | :41:10. | :41:14. | |
able to throw off appalling local authorities he did nothing for them, | :41:14. | :41:19. | |
who did worse than nothing, who dragged them down. They took the | :41:19. | :41:23. | |
power of entrepreneurs to do something different. Some local | :41:23. | :41:27. | |
authorities, Tower Hamlets, Camden in London, who have been | :41:27. | :41:30. | |
fantastically successful. Just to say that the local authority model | :41:30. | :41:34. | |
was bad because it didn't work in some places is nonsense, it is | :41:34. | :41:39. | |
costing us a fortune. What would you do in those places? We need to | :41:39. | :41:46. | |
beef up local authorities. You can look at examples like Alberta in | :41:46. | :41:49. | |
Canada, where the local authority works in an effective way. There | :41:49. | :41:54. | |
are lots of models of making them accountable. It is having a | :41:54. | :42:01. | |
democratically accountable middle to here. Who is that? Sir Michael | :42:01. | :42:07. | |
will trot, the chair of Ofsted! some academies are failing, why is | :42:07. | :42:10. | |
that allowed to happen? It is a good question, one of the problems | :42:11. | :42:16. | |
we are facing his there used to be 200 academies, and there are a | :42:16. | :42:22. | |
handful of those below the accepted standard. It used to be the case | :42:22. | :42:25. | |
that the DFE had a capacity to intervene in those and try and sort | :42:25. | :42:34. | |
them out. We are now in a situation that there are 2500, and the | :42:34. | :42:42. | |
question is, who is intervening, if you like? De chair of Ofsted is | :42:43. | :42:46. | |
intending that they should start inspecting, not just all academies | :42:46. | :42:50. | |
but Academy chains, and working out if they are good or not. I | :42:50. | :42:53. | |
absolutely welcome back. I think anybody who believes in the | :42:53. | :42:57. | |
programme needs to be transparent. Is it your view that everybody | :42:57. | :43:01. | |
should go to a local authority comprehensive? I think everybody | :43:01. | :43:08. | |
should go to a good local school. It is not about it been a | :43:08. | :43:13. | |
comprehensive. Do you think there should be other state schools that | :43:13. | :43:19. | |
are not local authority schools? think we need a good local school... | :43:19. | :43:24. | |
That is not what I asked. Do you think they should be the sole | :43:24. | :43:29. | |
providers? I think we need local, democratic accountability. If you | :43:29. | :43:33. | |
look at systems like in Finland, there is a local authority system, | :43:33. | :43:37. | |
but not the same as we are familiar with in here. You need to have a | :43:37. | :43:44. | |
middle Tear, democratic accountability, planning, or cannot | :43:44. | :43:50. | |
Collaboration, these are simple, technical things we need. We can | :43:50. | :43:54. | |
get this without this headlong drive into privatisation. Hang on a | :43:54. | :44:01. | |
minute, privatisation... We are running out of time. Legally, they | :44:01. | :44:05. | |
are called exempt charities, they are charity is regretted by the DFE, | :44:05. | :44:12. | |
taking issue share capital, they cannot even raise debt. Let's leave | :44:12. | :44:22. | |
:44:22. | :44:24. | ||
it there, I'm afraid. Interesting original principles of the welfare | :44:24. | :44:27. | |
state, where you have to pay in before you get the benefits, and | :44:27. | :44:31. | |
with a renewed emphasis on individual responsibility. That is | :44:31. | :44:36. | |
what a Conservative MP is arguing in a new pamphlet published today. | :44:36. | :44:40. | |
We'll discuss his ideas in a moment, but first let me take you back to | :44:40. | :44:43. | |
1942, when Sir William Beveridge laid out his plan for an all | :44:43. | :44:53. | |
:44:53. | :44:58. | ||
Oxford has had the unusual experience with Sir William | :44:58. | :45:02. | |
Beveridge working at the college producing a social document of | :45:02. | :45:08. | |
revolutionary importance. He has put the immense store of economic | :45:08. | :45:13. | |
learning, human sympathy and Social Administration, accumulated in her | :45:13. | :45:17. | |
long life of service devoted to his fellow men. If adopted, no one in | :45:17. | :45:25. | |
Britain who is willing to work will ever again suffer absolute want. | :45:25. | :45:34. | |
This proposes first a unified social insurance system. By paying | :45:34. | :45:41. | |
a single, weekly contribution, through one Insurance stamp, | :45:41. | :45:50. | |
everyone will be able to get all the benefits that he or his family | :45:50. | :45:56. | |
need. The Beveridge Report shows had to begin overthrowing the five | :45:56. | :46:03. | |
giant evils. Pittsburgh as all too great effort. Much can be done to | :46:03. | :46:10. | |
peace. -- it spurs us all. Men and women in the armed forces do not | :46:10. | :46:15. | |
require more incentive to do their utmost but we must believe a fuller | :46:15. | :46:23. | |
life and better Britain awaits us after the war. Commentary from a | :46:24. | :46:27. | |
time when currently was not entirely neutral in what it said. | :46:27. | :46:30. | |
And I am joined by Chris Skidmore, Conservative MP and author of his | :46:30. | :46:34. | |
own report, A New Beveridge, which marks the 70th anniversary of the | :46:34. | :46:36. | |
original, Liberal Democrat MP and chairman of his party's Beveridge | :46:36. | :46:44. | |
Group, John Pugh, and the Labour MP, Lisa Nandy. Welcome to all. Lay out | :46:44. | :46:52. | |
your soul. What is Beveridge mark two? If it set about creating a | :46:52. | :46:58. | |
national minimum and the safety net. People had to contribute. The | :46:58. | :47:01. | |
understood they were putting into the state. It was a contract | :47:01. | :47:05. | |
between the individual and the state. The safety net has become | :47:05. | :47:11. | |
too high. We have become 53 presentable people becoming net | :47:11. | :47:16. | |
recipients of state benefits. 70 years on, we have a huge | :47:16. | :47:21. | |
demographic challenge. The average life expectancy was 59. It is | :47:22. | :47:27. | |
rising dramatically. The need to go back to the original principles in | :47:27. | :47:31. | |
understanding that, if we want a welfare state sustainable for the | :47:31. | :47:35. | |
21st century, we cannot go along the original model of the pre-war | :47:35. | :47:40. | |
report. We need to adapt it. problems which are outlined, such | :47:40. | :47:44. | |
as affordability and people taking advantage of the welfare state and | :47:44. | :47:47. | |
not exercising personal responsibilities. They were | :47:47. | :47:51. | |
highlighted in the day of Beveridge and wear a dress them. Chris is not | :47:51. | :47:58. | |
coming up with any solutions to the problems. -- were addressed then. | :47:58. | :48:04. | |
Chris is proposing something much more radical. Making them repay | :48:04. | :48:14. | |
:48:14. | :48:14. | ||
their JSA. That is the jobseekers allowance. Reducing universal | :48:14. | :48:18. | |
benefits. Beveridge understood very clearly that some element of | :48:18. | :48:24. | |
universal benefit was essential. My worry is, if we go down that route, | :48:24. | :48:28. | |
we Wallander with a more divided attitude on welfare there we have | :48:28. | :48:38. | |
:48:38. | :48:42. | ||
currently got. -- we will go down a more divided route on welfare. | :48:42. | :48:47. | |
we lost sight of the very important part of Beveridge - the | :48:47. | :48:51. | |
contributory principle? Weather Report is helpful is he does | :48:51. | :48:57. | |
resurrect the idea of national insurance and social security. -- | :48:57. | :49:02. | |
where the report is helpful. Ashlyn shares today is really another tax, | :49:02. | :49:11. | |
isn't it? -- national insurance. What was important is full | :49:11. | :49:14. | |
employment. Mine are absolutely desperate for work. The vast | :49:14. | :49:19. | |
majority of the 2.5 million people unemployed in this country want to | :49:19. | :49:23. | |
work. It seems odd to me that what you have proposed in this report is | :49:23. | :49:27. | |
based on the idea that people do not want to work. Take the proposal | :49:27. | :49:32. | |
you made about young people. You say a young person who has not | :49:32. | :49:35. | |
contributed much to the system should take unemployment benefits | :49:35. | :49:40. | |
as a loan. How does that help? It that young person does not want to | :49:40. | :49:44. | |
work, how does it encourage them into work when they know they would | :49:44. | :49:49. | |
be paying more back into the system inconsequence? For London 50,000 | :49:49. | :49:55. | |
young people are claiming benefits. That is �25 million a week. What we | :49:55. | :49:58. | |
have lost and the welfare state is incentivising individuals to do the | :49:59. | :50:02. | |
right thing. How does that incentivise the young person who | :50:02. | :50:07. | |
does not want to work? The vast majority do and they are not the | :50:07. | :50:12. | |
jobs. Why would paying more, when they're getting work, incentivise | :50:12. | :50:17. | |
them to get work? misunderstanding that everybody | :50:17. | :50:21. | |
belongs to a society where they put-in. If you have not paid the | :50:21. | :50:26. | |
tax, you have to owed the money to the State. That should apply to | :50:26. | :50:30. | |
student fees as well. With the situation of women - women who | :50:30. | :50:34. | |
choose to take time out of work in order to have children and bring up | :50:34. | :50:37. | |
those children - presumably would not be arguing they should be | :50:37. | :50:43. | |
penalised because they put less into the system than men? Of course | :50:43. | :50:46. | |
not. The coalition government has looked at flexible paternity leave | :50:46. | :50:51. | |
and I agree with that. The broad point is, if we want to have a | :50:51. | :50:55. | |
welfare state with good schools and good hospitals, there is only a | :50:55. | :50:59. | |
certain limited amount of money. We have to ensure that where | :50:59. | :51:02. | |
millionaires are claiming winter fuel allowance, Beveridge would | :51:02. | :51:08. | |
have turned in his grave. What would beverage have thought of the | :51:08. | :51:14. | |
criticism that what was a rigid sign to be a hand up in the bad | :51:14. | :51:19. | |
times -- was originally designed to be a hand up in the bad times has | :51:19. | :51:24. | |
become a lifestyle? Beveridge was acutely aware of the Victorian | :51:24. | :51:27. | |
distinction between the undeserving and the deserving poor. There are | :51:27. | :51:33. | |
such people. Some are poor despite their best means. Any welfare | :51:33. | :51:41. | |
system has had difficult half of -- task of differentiating these two | :51:41. | :51:48. | |
categories was dubbed this view of human nature, he described the | :51:48. | :51:54. | |
British working public as some of the biggest idlers on the planet. | :51:54. | :52:02. | |
Deduce say that? It said we are among the worst idlers. -- did you | :52:02. | :52:06. | |
say that? We have a huge problem with productivity in the Western | :52:06. | :52:10. | |
world. In the 21st century, the Rules of the game have changed and | :52:10. | :52:15. | |
we must adapt. Where do you come in? Something interesting happened | :52:15. | :52:20. | |
in the 1960s. We took about deserving and undeserving. Benefits | :52:20. | :52:27. | |
were based on what is deserved to what you need. The difficulty that | :52:27. | :52:31. | |
people on the left have, which has been exposed for what Chris has | :52:31. | :52:35. | |
written today, when we hear the Labour Party talking about the can | :52:35. | :52:40. | |
to be due principle, are we happy about getting themselves into a | :52:40. | :52:43. | |
position where they can say to themselves that people who have not | :52:43. | :52:47. | |
been earning - immigrant families - large immigrant families, you will | :52:47. | :52:50. | |
get a larger rate of benefit and someone who has been hit a long | :52:51. | :52:55. | |
time? When Beveridge came up with his support for a mass immigration | :52:55. | :53:01. | |
was not an issue. There was a sense of, if you had been serving in the | :53:01. | :53:05. | |
Army, working in factories and so on, we have had people without that | :53:05. | :53:09. | |
record. I prepared to say to those people, you will have a lower | :53:09. | :53:15. | |
standard of living where you will be in poverty because of having a | :53:15. | :53:19. | |
differentiated benefit system. Labour Party must have a welfare | :53:19. | :53:24. | |
reform policy by the next election. Absolutely. There are two things | :53:24. | :53:27. | |
that are missing from this discussion. The best way to cut the | :53:27. | :53:31. | |
welfare bill is to get people into work and stimulate the economy into | :53:31. | :53:35. | |
creating jobs. The good way to do that, and take people out of the | :53:35. | :53:41. | |
welfare system, is to make work pay. A huge number of the people that | :53:41. | :53:45. | |
are being talked about art in it, receiving tax credits, will be | :53:45. | :53:48. | |
receiving the universal credit because work, quite simply, does | :53:48. | :53:52. | |
not pay. That has been a problem for a government minister as long | :53:52. | :53:56. | |
as I had been covering politics. Is there traction him what you have | :53:56. | :54:01. | |
been saying in the Conservative Party? People realise we are in | :54:01. | :54:05. | |
desperate economic times are we must realise this is unsustainable | :54:05. | :54:11. | |
and must move with the times. -- and we must realise. This is for | :54:11. | :54:19. | |
the future. We must look at the future. It is the start of a great | :54:19. | :54:23. | |
debate. Get out the turkey, get in front of the telly. No, we're not a | :54:23. | :54:26. | |
month early for Christmas, today our American cousins are | :54:26. | :54:35. | |
celebrating Thanksgiving. It is a great holiday. One thing Barack | :54:35. | :54:38. | |
Obama will be feeling especially thankful for is his campaign's top | :54:38. | :54:41. | |
notch private polling operation. It is widely credited with giving him | :54:41. | :54:43. | |
a mathematical edge over Mitt Romney in last month's presidential | :54:43. | :54:48. | |
And it's left Republican pollsters scratching their heads over how | :54:48. | :54:54. | |
they managed to get their numbers so wrong. Adam's been meeting one | :54:54. | :55:04. | |
:55:04. | :55:06. | ||
of them, Fox News favourite Frank Luntz. He has the immediate | :55:06. | :55:11. | |
reaction. We have some of the most important people in America seated | :55:11. | :55:19. | |
right here. For a glance has made his name folks sing -- filming | :55:19. | :55:23. | |
televised focus groups. He said Mitt Romney would triumph in the | :55:23. | :55:30. | |
popular vote. Barack Obama has empathy and Mitt Romney does not. | :55:30. | :55:34. | |
He came across as a no-nonsense businessman that he did not | :55:34. | :55:38. | |
understand the challenges. Barack Obama may not have been able to fix | :55:38. | :55:44. | |
the problems but he proved he understood them. Some boffins did | :55:44. | :55:47. | |
get the result right. The Republican polling establish what | :55:48. | :55:56. | |
was also universally wrong. Why? establishment. You have to work out | :55:56. | :56:01. | |
who will vote. Those that are supported Barack Obama turned out a | :56:01. | :56:04. | |
much higher numbers than anyone expected. It is not just judging | :56:04. | :56:13. | |
what people think, it is judging the intensity - the passion - the | :56:13. | :56:17. | |
commitment of that thought. There are lessons for the pollsters but | :56:17. | :56:23. | |
also for the politicians. Number one, whoever defines first wins the | :56:23. | :56:29. | |
election. Number two, if you don't have a positive, proactive | :56:29. | :56:35. | |
visionary approach, they will not vote for you. There is no not | :56:35. | :56:38. | |
candidate X. They have to vote for someone and not just against | :56:38. | :56:42. | |
someone. Their third is knowing who will they do making sure it will | :56:42. | :56:52. | |
:56:52. | :56:56. | ||
supporters actually participate. -- the third is knowing who they will | :56:56. | :57:03. | |
vote for. It is about understanding good difficult challenges of hard- | :57:03. | :57:08. | |
working people. The challenge for Labour is not just to be critical. | :57:08. | :57:13. | |
Critics don't just get votes, they need a positive alternative. The | :57:13. | :57:20. | |
plan for the Lib Dems is to be relevant. You cannot win people | :57:20. | :57:26. | |
over amnesty to something that is distinctive. You wrote the last | :57:27. | :57:31. | |
Conservative manifesto. I bet the next one is pretty different. | :57:31. | :57:36. | |
might not have so much in it. not think you will have a big | :57:36. | :57:40. | |
society and I do not think you will be saying vote Ploo, go green. What | :57:40. | :57:45. | |
do you think the thrust of it should be? We heard in the | :57:45. | :57:49. | |
conference speech this year, deficit, welfare schools. Those of | :57:49. | :57:54. | |
the big issues for him. He thinks layback are on the wrong side of | :57:54. | :57:58. | |
all of those issues. That is what and see the manifesto been built | :57:58. | :58:03. | |
around. They have a mountain to climb. Mr Obama could lose lots of | :58:03. | :58:07. | |
votes and still win that your party has to gain a lot of votes. I do | :58:07. | :58:15. | |
not think that has been turned by a sitting Prime Minister since 1955. | :58:15. | :58:20. | |
Possibly. -- has been done. Two things give me confidence. The | :58:20. | :58:27. | |
Prime Minister identifying strivers. It took a while. And Disraeli. And | :58:27. | :58:30. | |
Blair indeed. What the Obama victory shows, is the campaign he | :58:30. | :58:35. | |
would like to fight, Britain is on the bike track, do not turn back, | :58:35. | :58:39. | |
can That's all for today. Thanks to our guests. The One O'clock News is | :58:39. | :58:44. | |
starting over on BBC One now. And I will be back here tonight for This | :58:44. | :58:46. | |
Week with Anne Atkins talking women bishops, Richard Bacon on gossip | :58:46. | :58:50. | |
and Ann Leslie looking back over the news of the week. So join me, | :58:50. | :58:53. | |
Michael Portillo and Alan Johnson at 11:35am on BBC1. And I'll be | :58:53. | :58:57. |