Browse content similar to 15/10/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Good afternoon and welcome to the Daily Politics. David Cameron says | :00:41. | :00:46. | |
he'll fight to reduce EU red tape for businesses as a report from | :00:47. | :00:49. | |
company bosses says regulations are costing UK firms billions of pounds. | :00:50. | :00:52. | |
Should lads' mags featuring pictures of topless women be sold in | :00:53. | :00:55. | |
supermarkets? We'll talk to Green MP Caroline Lucas about her campaign to | :00:56. | :00:59. | |
persuade Tesco to bin them. MPs debate new measures to control | :01:00. | :01:02. | |
dangerous dogs, but Labour say they don't go far enough. | :01:03. | :01:08. | |
And as the race to be the next deputy Speaker of the House of | :01:09. | :01:13. | |
Commons heats up, we'll hear from five - yes, five - of the | :01:14. | :01:15. | |
candidates. All that in the next hour. And with | :01:16. | :01:24. | |
us for the whole programme today is the TV presenter par excellence, | :01:25. | :01:31. | |
Richard Madeley. That's very kind! Take the introduction with a smile. | :01:32. | :01:35. | |
Let's start with the news that leading British business figures | :01:36. | :01:38. | |
have attended a meeting of the cabinet today to share their report | :01:39. | :01:45. | |
on EU red tape. In the last few minutes, there has been more | :01:46. | :01:52. | |
breaking news on pleb gate. This is a report not into the original | :01:53. | :01:56. | |
incident, but a report into a meeting held between the former | :01:57. | :02:00. | |
Government Chief Whip, Andrew Mitchell, and representatives of the | :02:01. | :02:04. | |
police Federation. You will remember that Mr Mitchell was alleged to have | :02:05. | :02:07. | |
said that he thought officers who wouldn't let his -- let him ride his | :02:08. | :02:15. | |
bike through the gates of Downing Street were, and I quote, effing | :02:16. | :02:26. | |
plebs. He always said that he never said that. He said that he had never | :02:27. | :02:31. | |
used those words, but that he had been impatient, that he thought the | :02:32. | :02:38. | |
police were there to help, and that indeed he apologised for it. And yet | :02:39. | :02:43. | |
the representatives of what in effect is the police trade union and | :02:44. | :02:46. | |
said that he had simply refuse to clear up what was said on the | :02:47. | :02:50. | |
fateful night at Downing Street, that he hadn't been clear about what | :02:51. | :02:55. | |
had and hadn't gone on. Today the police watchdog says, in event, not | :02:56. | :03:00. | |
good enough. Its report says that this raises issues of honesty and | :03:01. | :03:06. | |
integrity and discreditable conduct. It says that the police officers | :03:07. | :03:12. | |
involved had a clear agenda, to discredit Mr Mitchell and to pursue | :03:13. | :03:23. | |
the police campaign against cuts. This report said that the police | :03:24. | :03:29. | |
therefore have a case to answer. The police have already investigated | :03:30. | :03:31. | |
themselves and looked into the behaviour of these officers, and the | :03:32. | :03:35. | |
report, you would be surprised to learn, clear the officers and said | :03:36. | :03:39. | |
that there was no deliberate intention to life. This is a | :03:40. | :03:45. | |
dramatic turnaround, given how long we have been waiting for the report | :03:46. | :03:49. | |
on the original incident, as you say. But now we have this | :03:50. | :03:53. | |
conflicting report in terms of what the Police Federation claimed was | :03:54. | :03:57. | |
said. Where does that leave the police? This it the first act of | :03:58. | :04:07. | |
drama. There will be a report from the Crown Prosecution Service within | :04:08. | :04:11. | |
a matter of days. Keir Starmer made that clear on the Andrew Marr | :04:12. | :04:17. | |
programme on Sunday. What is happening here is that the police | :04:18. | :04:20. | |
watchdog is acting the man who had to resign from the Cabinet, who in | :04:21. | :04:25. | |
effect says the police lied. They lied about what happened in a | :04:26. | :04:28. | |
meeting, they did it deliberately, they did it to bring me down, they | :04:29. | :04:33. | |
did it to discredit the government. That is a very serious charge | :04:34. | :04:37. | |
indeed. You may ask where it leads to. In one sense, the answer is | :04:38. | :04:44. | |
nowhere. Mr Mitchell could in theory now pursue a complaint against the | :04:45. | :04:48. | |
officers involved, but I am told that he believes there is almost no | :04:49. | :04:53. | |
point in doing so, given that the police have already investigated | :04:54. | :04:54. | |
themselves and declared themselves to be not guilty. | :04:55. | :05:02. | |
Nick Robinson, thank you. Now, to news of a different sort. Leading | :05:03. | :05:07. | |
British business figures have attended a report today about red | :05:08. | :05:14. | |
tape. The Prime Minister's business | :05:15. | :05:16. | |
taskforce has concluded that relaxing rules on health and safety | :05:17. | :05:19. | |
compliance alone may save ?2 billion. This is hardly a surprise, | :05:20. | :05:22. | |
Richard Madeley, that business wants to slash red tape. I think and dream | :05:23. | :05:27. | |
of nothing else other than EU regulation! Apparently the EU red | :05:28. | :05:40. | |
tape has been under fire for awhile. I wonder if this is Cameron | :05:41. | :05:43. | |
beginning to position himself for the inevitable debate on whether we | :05:44. | :05:48. | |
should be in or out. And this will help, because you can use this as a | :05:49. | :05:51. | |
stick to beat the European commission. As you say, there are | :05:52. | :05:56. | |
pushing on an open door. The European commission is listening. Is | :05:57. | :06:02. | |
that a sign of the times generally? Inevitably, legislation in Europe | :06:03. | :06:09. | |
has become massively top-heavy and needs to be cut back, and that was a | :06:10. | :06:13. | |
process that was inevitable, I think. But I think it puts Cameron | :06:14. | :06:18. | |
in a useful position. He can be seen to be criticising be you, but also | :06:19. | :06:24. | |
making tomorrow and habitable to be. Now it's time for our Daily Quiz. | :06:25. | :06:28. | |
The question for today is: What did George Osborne claim 160 million | :06:29. | :06:30. | |
Chinese people were fans of? Was it: Boris Johnson, expensive handbags, | :06:31. | :06:45. | |
Downton Abbey or Glastonbury. At the end of the show, Richard will give | :06:46. | :06:47. | |
us the correct answer. New measures to control dangerous | :06:48. | :06:54. | |
dogs in England and Wales are being taken through Parliament today. It | :06:55. | :06:57. | |
follows some high-profile tragedies and a vigorous campaign by postmen, | :06:58. | :07:00. | |
among others. It's estimated that around 210,000 people are attacked | :07:01. | :07:05. | |
by dogs in England every year. There have been 16 fatal dog attacks in | :07:06. | :07:08. | |
homes over the last eight years, including nine involving children. | :07:09. | :07:14. | |
The most recent death was that of teenager Jade Anderson in March this | :07:15. | :07:17. | |
year following an attack by four dogs in the home of a family friend. | :07:18. | :07:22. | |
Currently, the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act covers only attacks by dogs in | :07:23. | :07:25. | |
public places and private areas from where dogs are banned, such as a | :07:26. | :07:32. | |
neighbour's garden or a park. The Government plans to extend existing | :07:33. | :07:36. | |
laws to cover dog attacks on private property - but not in cases where a | :07:37. | :07:42. | |
dog attacks an intruder. And also extend laws to cover cases where | :07:43. | :07:45. | |
dangerous dogs attack guide dogs and other assistance dogs. However, | :07:46. | :07:49. | |
Labour says the Government proposals don't go far enough. Among other | :07:50. | :07:53. | |
things, they want the introduction of Dog Control Notices - basically | :07:54. | :07:58. | |
ASBOs for dogs. These could enforce the muzzling of the dog whenever it | :07:59. | :08:02. | |
is in a place to which the public has access, and if the dog is male, | :08:03. | :08:06. | |
neutering it. Joining me now, Shadow Home Office Minister Steve Reed and | :08:07. | :08:09. | |
the Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell who in opposition was the party's | :08:10. | :08:12. | |
animal welfare spokesman. And we should say that we asked the | :08:13. | :08:15. | |
Government for an interview with a Minister on this, but none was | :08:16. | :08:22. | |
available. Welcome to both of you. The Government is planning to | :08:23. | :08:25. | |
toughen up regulation and legislation. That must be a good | :08:26. | :08:29. | |
thing? They are making some movement, but they are not going far | :08:30. | :08:35. | |
enough. I met Michael Anderson, the father of jade, the 14-year-old girl | :08:36. | :08:39. | |
who was savaged to death by a group of dogs out of control. He came to | :08:40. | :08:44. | |
Parliament to ask us to support the introduction of dog control | :08:45. | :08:47. | |
notices, that would allow dogs to be muzzled, kept on a lead, the owners | :08:48. | :08:51. | |
of the dogs to have compulsory training. The Government is refusing | :08:52. | :08:58. | |
to do this. It exists in Scotland, where it works, it is supported by | :08:59. | :09:03. | |
Battersea dogs home, the RSPCA, the Association of Chief Police | :09:04. | :09:04. | |
Officers, everybody except the Government. When a child is killed | :09:05. | :09:13. | |
by dogs mauling at them, surely legislation can't go far enough to | :09:14. | :09:17. | |
prevent that happening again? Clearly the law at the moment is | :09:18. | :09:22. | |
lacking tremendously, and the Government are bringing forward | :09:23. | :09:25. | |
measures, but I have sympathy with what is being said. It doesn't go | :09:26. | :09:32. | |
far enough. We do need dog control notices and legislation that ensures | :09:33. | :09:35. | |
that the owners are brought to book for allowing their dogs to behave in | :09:36. | :09:40. | |
a dangerous and irresponsible way. But every dog is different, and you | :09:41. | :09:46. | |
need a law that can deal with a particular case rather than a | :09:47. | :09:53. | |
broadbrush approach. Can you have a law that is that nuanced when it | :09:54. | :09:57. | |
comes to animals that are unpredictable? You can, because | :09:58. | :10:00. | |
there are different breeds of dog, different types of owners. Some | :10:01. | :10:05. | |
owners are totally irresponsible and don't deserve to have a dog, but | :10:06. | :10:09. | |
others just make one mistake and should be put in the same category | :10:10. | :10:12. | |
as someone using a dog for illegal activities. There are breeds that | :10:13. | :10:18. | |
are banned, but there are dog that can still attack people that are of | :10:19. | :10:22. | |
any breed. Isn't it the people who look after them that we need to look | :10:23. | :10:27. | |
at? You are right. The key problem is irresponsible dog owners, but dog | :10:28. | :10:31. | |
control notices and allow a quick way of addressing the problems of | :10:32. | :10:34. | |
potentially dangerous dogs before they get out of control. How would | :10:35. | :10:40. | |
that actually work? You can be served immediately by the police or | :10:41. | :10:43. | |
a local authority without the need to go through the courts. Is that | :10:44. | :10:49. | |
what happened in Scotland? It is, and there is evidence that it is | :10:50. | :10:54. | |
effective. I thought you were here to argue against dog ASBOs sometimes | :10:55. | :11:01. | |
we do agree when it is a matter of common sense. This is about a | :11:02. | :11:06. | |
practical way of dealing with a social problem. Micro-chipping is | :11:07. | :11:11. | |
coming in, and I fought for that, I argued that it should come in. They | :11:12. | :11:16. | |
can link the dogs are the owner, so it means that a dog control notice | :11:17. | :11:20. | |
makes sense linking to that, because you can prove who owns the dog. That | :11:21. | :11:27. | |
is not coming in until 2017. The Government are too weak to come here | :11:28. | :11:30. | |
today to defend their position. Andrew is a Tory MP but not part of | :11:31. | :11:35. | |
the Government. Why would they not debate this? This is not a subject | :11:36. | :11:41. | |
we should turn into a political battle. This is about bringing | :11:42. | :11:45. | |
sensible laws to deal with the social problem. Dangerous dogs, dogs | :11:46. | :11:51. | |
being used in crime, dogs being used in an irresponsible way. I think the | :11:52. | :11:56. | |
Government needs to look at this in a bit more detail and perhaps accept | :11:57. | :12:01. | |
one or two of the changes this afternoon. It is the owner that is | :12:02. | :12:06. | |
the problem, nine times out of ten. And some of them don't really seem | :12:07. | :12:10. | |
to take any care or interest at all in the behaviour of their dog, and | :12:11. | :12:14. | |
in fact some of them, they are quite proud of having an aggressive dog. | :12:15. | :12:20. | |
And one of the issues coming up is what is the guidelines for dealing | :12:21. | :12:24. | |
with a dog owner who allows their dog to kill. How do you make sure | :12:25. | :12:28. | |
that all of the dogs are micro-chipped? You make it a | :12:29. | :12:34. | |
requirement when the dog is first-born, or when you sell the | :12:35. | :12:40. | |
dog. If you buy a dog, the person who has bred the dog... But if the | :12:41. | :12:50. | |
dog was scanned for a microchip and there wasn't a microchip in it, they | :12:51. | :12:53. | |
have immediately broken the law. There are lots of advantages of | :12:54. | :12:58. | |
having a microchip system, and also lost and stolen dogs can be returned | :12:59. | :13:01. | |
to their owners. Bruce Forsyth's daughter lost her dogs, and she got | :13:02. | :13:06. | |
them back because the vet scanned the microchip. Why is it delayed | :13:07. | :13:15. | |
until 2017? Enough agreement! What about harsher sentences for people | :13:16. | :13:19. | |
who have dogs who go on to attack people? Once again, we have to be | :13:20. | :13:26. | |
sensible about this. I own a Staffordshire bull terrier, and they | :13:27. | :13:28. | |
can be mischievous and run after other dogs. And somebody can think | :13:29. | :13:33. | |
that there is a dog attack when they are playing. So you do have to be | :13:34. | :13:37. | |
very sensible about how you apply this. But people who use dogs to | :13:38. | :13:43. | |
attack people in crime, there should be much tougher sentences for those | :13:44. | :13:50. | |
people. The current maximum sentence for that is two years. Do you think | :13:51. | :13:54. | |
there are some people who's just shouldn't be allowed to have dogs? | :13:55. | :14:00. | |
Yes, I do. I did a newspaper around when I was a kid. There were three | :14:01. | :14:04. | |
houses that I'd refuse to deliver papers to, because the dogs even | :14:05. | :14:07. | |
throw closed front door would jump up as you you put the paper through | :14:08. | :14:12. | |
to try to get your fingers. There was another thing that went through | :14:13. | :14:18. | |
an idea from backbenchers that you have to put a grill over your post | :14:19. | :14:24. | |
box if you own a dog. I totally agree with what you are saying. It | :14:25. | :14:29. | |
is a shame the government doesn't. Thank you both very much. Should | :14:30. | :14:34. | |
magazines with images of scantily clad women on the cover be sold on | :14:35. | :14:37. | |
display in big supermarket chains like Tesco? Campaign is meeting at | :14:38. | :14:43. | |
Parliament today says dads' mags like Nuts and Sue or pornography and | :14:44. | :14:51. | |
should be withdrawn. Here's the singer Charlotte Church talking last | :14:52. | :14:54. | |
night about young women in the music industry. | :14:55. | :15:09. | |
to present themselves as objects, and when I was 19 or 20 I found | :15:10. | :15:15. | |
myself in this position, being pressured into wearing more and | :15:16. | :15:19. | |
more revealing outfits and the lines I had spun at me again and | :15:20. | :15:23. | |
again by middle age meant was, you have got a great body, why not show | :15:24. | :15:29. | |
off? Do not worry, it will look classy, it will look artistic. I | :15:30. | :15:34. | |
felt deeply uncomfortable about the whole thing. Charlotte Church has | :15:35. | :15:41. | |
in the past posed for men's magazines. Caroline Lucas is | :15:42. | :15:44. | |
hosting this evening's meeting in Parliament and we have been joined | :15:45. | :15:47. | |
by the writer and broadcaster Toby Young. Is the problem with the | :15:48. | :15:52. | |
content of these magazines or the positioning of them? It is the | :15:53. | :15:57. | |
positioning and the sense of being in a family retailer. Tesco likes | :15:58. | :16:03. | |
to portray itself as being a family retailer and it is a family | :16:04. | :16:07. | |
retailer that does not sell adult material. We have had a judgment | :16:08. | :16:14. | |
that says publications like a Zoo and the Nuts are adult material. | :16:15. | :16:18. | |
All we are asking Tesco to do is to abide by its own policy, which is | :16:19. | :16:24. | |
not to stock it. The does not sound that drastic. I do have some | :16:25. | :16:28. | |
sympathy for this campaign in general. I have got a daughter and | :16:29. | :16:32. | |
I do not want her to be the victim of sexual ism. But they have got | :16:33. | :16:38. | |
the politics of this wrong. The way to go about this is not to try and | :16:39. | :16:43. | |
banned the sexual or objectification of women, but to | :16:44. | :16:48. | |
persuade men not to buy them. Caroline was saying it was about | :16:49. | :16:53. | |
the positioning of them were children could quite easily see | :16:54. | :16:58. | |
them. We will talk about objectives Acacia in general, but would you | :16:59. | :17:02. | |
have a problem with it being taken off the shelves at Tesco? I would | :17:03. | :17:08. | |
say if you want to persuade men to reform their attitudes and not | :17:09. | :17:13. | |
purchase these magazines, at the way to do it is to persuade them, | :17:14. | :17:18. | |
not to remove the choice altogether. If people want to get hold of these | :17:19. | :17:21. | |
magazines they can go to special shops and get them online. | :17:22. | :17:26. | |
Persuading people not to buy them is part of saying it is not an | :17:27. | :17:31. | |
everyday piece of consumption. Putting these magazines between | :17:32. | :17:35. | |
grocery and detergents gives the impression these are normal, | :17:36. | :17:40. | |
everyday items and they are not. It would have not to have them in | :17:41. | :17:46. | |
retailers. Are they more every day? They contain pictures of topless | :17:47. | :17:51. | |
women, that the editor has news features and sport. We are | :17:52. | :17:55. | |
persuaded by the industry to see them as every day, but they are not | :17:56. | :17:59. | |
every day, they are soft pornography. I believe in the top | :18:00. | :18:05. | |
shelf as a concept. How do you persuade your average bloke, who | :18:06. | :18:10. | |
likes this kind of stuff, to stop buying it? You persuade them up by | :18:11. | :18:17. | |
appealing to them in the first instance as brothers and husbands | :18:18. | :18:22. | |
and fathers of women. The problem with setting out with such a | :18:23. | :18:27. | |
draconian attitude is you are automatically going to alienate the | :18:28. | :18:30. | |
group you are trying to persuade to change their behaviour. Banning it | :18:31. | :18:35. | |
is not going to work because these images will always be available on | :18:36. | :18:39. | |
the Internet will start the question is how best to reform | :18:40. | :18:44. | |
men's behaviour and persuade them these sorts of images are wrong? | :18:45. | :18:49. | |
You do not do that by setting out with the censorious attitude. The | :18:50. | :18:54. | |
only person who is talking about being censorious is Toby. All we | :18:55. | :18:59. | |
are asking is for Tesco to implement his own policy. How would | :19:00. | :19:05. | |
you feel if the cheap executive of Tesco, a man, issued a statement as | :19:06. | :19:11. | |
a husband and a father of saying I had taken the decision on | :19:12. | :19:17. | |
principle? It is not as if it is an isolated incident. Why they cannot | :19:18. | :19:24. | |
do it all? One of the reasons Tesco are going in that direction is not | :19:25. | :19:29. | |
just because they have been subjected gentle persuasion, but | :19:30. | :19:33. | |
because they have been threatened with legal action. A is that | :19:34. | :19:40. | |
censorship? That seems to be using the authority of the state to track | :19:41. | :19:44. | |
and prohibit behaviour of which you disapprove. It is not the right way | :19:45. | :19:49. | |
to persuade men to change. We have got a statement from Tesco. I want | :19:50. | :19:53. | |
to come back to the idea of disapproval. The position many of | :19:54. | :19:59. | |
us are coming from is one that is rooted in concern about violence | :20:00. | :20:06. | |
against women. What we are saying is there is something wrong when we | :20:07. | :20:11. | |
have a situation where one in three girls think there are some times | :20:12. | :20:16. | |
when it is appropriate for a man to force a girl to have sex. When a | :20:17. | :20:21. | |
girl talks about unwanted sexual contact at school. We have a | :20:22. | :20:26. | |
concern about the daily diet where it says this kind of stuff is | :20:27. | :20:31. | |
normal, accessible and fine and a continuum that means violence | :20:32. | :20:35. | |
against women is more likely. I am not saying somebody goes out and | :20:36. | :20:39. | |
raised one of these magazines and commits violence. Of course not. Is | :20:40. | :20:46. | |
there not a defence between those magazines and what is in them and | :20:47. | :20:50. | |
the scenario you have described? There is no evidence prohibiting | :20:51. | :20:55. | |
the sale of lads mags, banning paged treatment clear it out | :20:56. | :20:59. | |
Twitter, and all these campaigns are lent, there is no evidence that | :21:00. | :21:04. | |
prohibiting the sale of these kinds of things is going to decrease | :21:05. | :21:09. | |
violence against women. If you look at the societies in which women are | :21:10. | :21:14. | |
most at risk, does our societies in which these sorts of materials are | :21:15. | :21:19. | |
already prohibited. You heard from Charlotte Church to herself regrets | :21:20. | :21:25. | |
posing in an overtly sexual eyes away, she felt exploited. The | :21:26. | :21:30. | |
market out there made money out of her, that is what she is claiming. | :21:31. | :21:35. | |
Taking that away would take away some of the interest. This is a | :21:36. | :21:41. | |
fringe issue. The real issue in terms of the effect of pornography | :21:42. | :21:47. | |
is on the internet. That is an absolutely huge issue, but I would | :21:48. | :21:52. | |
challenge the issue that because of that that makes this fringe. This | :21:53. | :21:56. | |
is where you go and get your groceries. This is what you are | :21:57. | :22:01. | |
picking off the shelf, this is something about day-to-day | :22:02. | :22:07. | |
normality. Even if you did put it on the top shelf, does it make it | :22:08. | :22:11. | |
normal or is it pornography which is what the campaign groups are | :22:12. | :22:16. | |
saying? It is soft porn if you want to graduate this. But, yes, you are | :22:17. | :22:25. | |
right, it makes it normal. It gives its a skene of respectability. Do | :22:26. | :22:30. | |
you think it is pornography? I would be happy to call its soft | :22:31. | :22:36. | |
porn, that is not the issue. The problem in the way the campaign is | :22:37. | :22:40. | |
being waged is there is more than a trace of snobbery. This is a point | :22:41. | :22:46. | |
George Orwell made. He said there was a streak within the British | :22:47. | :22:51. | |
working class which was fairly hedonistic. They liked gambling, | :22:52. | :22:57. | |
they liked bawdy postcards and drinking. The left-wing | :22:58. | :23:03. | |
intellectuals have campaigned against gambling and drinking and | :23:04. | :23:08. | |
postcards. You are getting more desperate. A You are not going to | :23:09. | :23:14. | |
persuade people to come over like this morally censorious school | :23:15. | :23:18. | |
mistress. I do not think I have been sitting here like a | :23:19. | :23:22. | |
schoolmistress, not that I had anything against school mistresses. | :23:23. | :23:27. | |
We want Tesco to implement their own policy, which is to say they do | :23:28. | :23:33. | |
not stop adult magazines. What if they do not? Continue to campaign. | :23:34. | :23:40. | |
The Co-op has already done it. If there is a case for legal action, | :23:41. | :23:45. | |
but not to take legal action. Tesco's say they only sell it to | :23:46. | :23:49. | |
over eight teams and they are on the shelf. Is that not enough? If | :23:50. | :23:54. | |
they stayed on the top shelf, it would be better, but they do not. | :23:55. | :23:59. | |
The placing of it within the shop is still not getting away from the | :24:00. | :24:03. | |
fact that we are sending out a message that this is normal and | :24:04. | :24:08. | |
acceptable. If you look at this issue in the round, coming back to | :24:09. | :24:12. | |
what you can do to persuade men not to buy these, you are on a hiding | :24:13. | :24:19. | |
to nothing. I still cannot see what evidence you have to show that you | :24:20. | :24:23. | |
could persuade men in large numbers not to buy these magazines. The | :24:24. | :24:28. | |
extraordinary decline in the sales of lads mags. But has the Internet | :24:29. | :24:35. | |
not taken that place? We do not know. The point you make about the | :24:36. | :24:40. | |
internet is a good one, but you cannot prohibit this kind of sexual | :24:41. | :24:45. | |
imagery. Trying to prohibit it is not the right way to go about it, | :24:46. | :24:50. | |
you have to persuade people it is wrong. What do you think about | :24:51. | :24:53. | |
newspapers that have pictures of naked girls? That is in the | :24:54. | :25:03. | |
mainstream. I do not think page three, again it is about making it | :25:04. | :25:07. | |
normal, and a paper that is supposed to be about news, and the | :25:08. | :25:12. | |
thing about it is it is being presented to young children, two | :25:13. | :25:16. | |
people of all ages as something that is normal and that is | :25:17. | :25:21. | |
dangerous. This is symptomatic of a liberal, puritanical attitude of | :25:22. | :25:26. | |
the left. If they do not like something, rather than persuade | :25:27. | :25:29. | |
people not to engage in it, they try and ban it. If you were | :25:30. | :25:35. | |
watching yesterday, you will know that election fever is engulfed in | :25:36. | :25:39. | |
Parliament this week. Tomorrow MPs will elect a new deputy speaker. | :25:40. | :25:45. | |
All MPs can vote, but only MPs on the Government's side can stand. | :25:46. | :25:50. | |
Seven Conservative MPs are vying for position. We spoke to two | :25:51. | :25:55. | |
yesterday and Charles is in the lobby with three more. | :25:56. | :26:00. | |
This is round two of the look at the titanic struggle for the big | :26:01. | :26:05. | |
chair. I am not so sure it is engulfed in Parliament, but we have | :26:06. | :26:10. | |
three candidates taking part, Brian Binley, Nadine Dorries and Gary | :26:11. | :26:15. | |
Streeter. You have to give a 32nd pitch to the wider constituency. | :26:16. | :26:19. | |
The opposition parties want to hear what you have got to say. I am | :26:20. | :26:26. | |
going to be strict with this. Brian, why should you be Deputy Speaker? I | :26:27. | :26:32. | |
have been in business almost 40 years and have learned the | :26:33. | :26:37. | |
importance of personal relationships for a successful | :26:38. | :26:39. | |
business. That knowledge will help me in the chair. You did not even | :26:40. | :26:48. | |
need 30 seconds. The Hang on. You are very eager. Fire away. There is | :26:49. | :26:56. | |
not a day when I am here when I do not feel privileged and I love the | :26:57. | :27:00. | |
tradition of the house of Commons and the processes, but I am a | :27:01. | :27:06. | |
moderniser as well. I voted to reduce the Tuesday late night and | :27:07. | :27:11. | |
normal business hours to not make the house of Commons normal. I | :27:12. | :27:15. | |
speak out often on behalf of other backbenchers and I had served as a | :27:16. | :27:24. | |
committee chairman. Well done. We have reset the clock. They are | :27:25. | :27:29. | |
eager this morning. My picture is simple. There is a job description. | :27:30. | :27:35. | |
The Deputy Speaker should be a good chair of meetings, should have a | :27:36. | :27:39. | |
wide knowledge of the House of Commons, should be a good team | :27:40. | :27:42. | |
player and should be a serving member of the chairmen's Panel and | :27:43. | :27:46. | |
I would like to think that I'd take pot of those boxes. When you are | :27:47. | :27:52. | |
sitting in the chair, if you get elected, you need various bits of | :27:53. | :27:57. | |
knowledge about the procedure. We are going to give you a couple of | :27:58. | :28:04. | |
questions. How did short of money, the annual amount given to | :28:05. | :28:09. | |
opposition parties, get its name? After a former Labour minister. | :28:10. | :28:20. | |
Which one? Len short? Edward Short. Which holy books are available to | :28:21. | :28:25. | |
members at the table when they take their earth? The Bible, the | :28:26. | :28:35. | |
courante, what is the...? There is also a book if you are a humanist | :28:36. | :28:40. | |
or an atheist. What is the Jewish boat? The Old Testament in Hebrew. | :28:41. | :28:48. | |
There is a Welsh Bible and a Gaelic Bible. | :28:49. | :28:55. | |
What is a money belt? It is where we pass a measure to spend money. | :28:56. | :29:00. | |
That may not be right, but it is the best thing I can come up with | :29:01. | :29:06. | |
at the time. It is a bill that deals with national taxation, but | :29:07. | :29:11. | |
it is only considered to be a money bill if the speaker says it is. He | :29:12. | :29:17. | |
has to sign a certificate. Exactly what I said. Had you look at my | :29:18. | :29:24. | |
piece of paper. When was the phrase father of the house first use? I | :29:25. | :29:29. | |
have no idea, although I am old enough to have been there. In the | :29:30. | :29:37. | |
19th century. They asked for her experience much sooner than that. | :29:38. | :29:43. | |
When in the 19th century? It does not say it. 100 years. What is the | :29:44. | :29:57. | |
Cranborne deal? Viscount Cranborne. This is the arrangement whereby 92 | :29:58. | :30:02. | |
hereditary Peers remained in Parliament... Yes. It was known as | :30:03. | :30:12. | |
the medical amendment. What are Henry VIII clauses? They allowed | :30:13. | :30:17. | |
the Secretary of State a great deal of discretion to pass powers and | :30:18. | :30:22. | |
make decisions after the Act of Parliament has passed. 10 out of 10. | :30:23. | :30:28. | |
There was one last one for you. What is the procedure on a member | :30:29. | :30:33. | |
asking the chair on whether they can go to Australia? Go and see the | :30:34. | :30:44. | |
chief whip. Are you excited or can you wait for it to be all over? I | :30:45. | :30:47. | |
cannot wait for it to be over. Our next guest is a journalist who's | :30:48. | :31:00. | |
a big fan of statistics. Well, aren't we all. But unlike me, he's | :31:01. | :31:03. | |
written a new book with the professor of risk from Cambridge | :31:04. | :31:06. | |
University, showing how little we really understand probability, | :31:07. | :31:09. | |
danger and risk. Because very few of us, it turns out, can really | :31:10. | :31:12. | |
understand the likelihood of falling under a bus or being hit by an | :31:13. | :31:16. | |
asteroid, they've come up with a new measurement called the MicroMort. | :31:17. | :31:18. | |
One MicroMort is equivalent to a one-in-a-million chance of death. | :31:19. | :31:25. | |
That's roughly the risk we all run of something horrible and fatal | :31:26. | :31:28. | |
happening to us on an average day in Britain. That leads to some | :31:29. | :31:31. | |
interesting comparisons. For example: the risk of death from a | :31:32. | :31:34. | |
general anaesthetic in a non-emergency operation is about ten | :31:35. | :31:37. | |
micromorts. That's the same risk as one sky-diving jump, or two shifts | :31:38. | :31:39. | |
working down a mine. Giving birth exposes the mother to | :31:40. | :31:48. | |
about 120 MicroMorts of risk. That's the same risk as riding a motorbike | :31:49. | :31:52. | |
from London to Edinburgh and back. And it's about the same as two | :31:53. | :31:55. | |
and-a-half days of active service during the most dangerous period of | :31:56. | :32:00. | |
the Afghanistan War. Well, to talk about those and other statistics I'm | :32:01. | :32:03. | |
joined now by one of the book's authors Michael Blastland. It seems | :32:04. | :32:15. | |
incredible that it is so dangerous to give birth, it is like being at | :32:16. | :32:20. | |
the height of the Afghanistan war. Well, there are two debates, as to | :32:21. | :32:25. | |
whether that risk is talking about the birth exacerbated an existing | :32:26. | :32:28. | |
condition, or just from the birth. Globally, the risk is enormous. | :32:29. | :32:36. | |
These are just UK figures. It is one of the worst risks a woman can face | :32:37. | :32:41. | |
in her lifetime globally. Some of the risks in developing countries, | :32:42. | :32:45. | |
they are stratospheric, it is about one in a hundred. Something like | :32:46. | :32:54. | |
40,000 MicroMorts. Generally, it seems that we are frightened of | :32:55. | :32:57. | |
things that will almost certainly not happen to us. Most of the big | :32:58. | :33:02. | |
risks that we worry about have diminished enormously. I clutch my | :33:03. | :33:08. | |
child's hand when we cross the road, but the chance of an 11-year-old | :33:09. | :33:12. | |
falling under the wheels of something is probably less now than | :33:13. | :33:16. | |
the chance of a two-year-old being caught in the blind cord on your | :33:17. | :33:21. | |
windows, for example. It has gone right down. There were no fatalities | :33:22. | :33:27. | |
in that category last year. Because of driver safety and speed bumps? A | :33:28. | :33:33. | |
lot of reasons. We can't say why it is happening necessarily. It may not | :33:34. | :33:40. | |
be that the roads are safer. It may be that the roads are so dangerous | :33:41. | :33:48. | |
that we never go anywhere near them. Is there something that you are | :33:49. | :33:51. | |
frightened of irrationally that is something unlikely to occur? Flying | :33:52. | :33:56. | |
is the one that a lot of people have a lot of trouble with, and air | :33:57. | :34:01. | |
travel is relatively safe. Fantastically safe. Not quite so | :34:02. | :34:05. | |
safe in light aircraft. Keep out of the little ones. Commercial ones are | :34:06. | :34:09. | |
safe. I'm fascinated by the statistics. But life is for living, | :34:10. | :34:13. | |
not endlessly calculating your chances of not getting to the end of | :34:14. | :34:20. | |
the day. There is an American book, the never list, and they are too | :34:21. | :34:25. | |
young American girls living their lives by calculating risk and not | :34:26. | :34:29. | |
doing things. The never list is things that they never do. And by | :34:30. | :34:32. | |
chapter three, catastrophe engulfed them. Sitting down is pretty bad for | :34:33. | :34:39. | |
you. There are risks associated with being sedentary. And they are | :34:40. | :34:47. | |
surprisingly high. If you add up all the damage that is done to everybody | :34:48. | :34:51. | |
and divided between us. And there is a risk of falling off the toilet and | :34:52. | :34:56. | |
breaking your neck! I will be careful the next time I go. The | :34:57. | :34:59. | |
interesting thing is how you apply it to politics, and I'm sure that | :35:00. | :35:03. | |
politicians are fascinated by the risks of campaigns and certain other | :35:04. | :35:08. | |
things. Vaccination was difficult for a lot of parents when the MMR | :35:09. | :35:12. | |
scandal happened, and parents clearly weighed up in their mind, | :35:13. | :35:16. | |
was it worse not to vaccinate your child, or vaccinating and having a | :35:17. | :35:21. | |
potential side-effect that proved not to be a threat after all. Do you | :35:22. | :35:26. | |
think those things are difficult for politicians when devising campaigns, | :35:27. | :35:29. | |
or should they look at probability and risk? Phenomenally difficult. | :35:30. | :35:34. | |
Because people are not just talking about the odds. You can say that the | :35:35. | :35:40. | |
chance of that happening is remote, and your belief that it is a serious | :35:41. | :35:44. | |
risk is misplaced, but that is not what we are talking about. They | :35:45. | :35:48. | |
might say, this is an unnatural risk, so they might worry about | :35:49. | :35:54. | |
somebody may be having too much power or too much money, or it is a | :35:55. | :35:59. | |
big corporation or a big government. So they say, natural risks can be as | :36:00. | :36:04. | |
severe as human made risks, man-made risks. Why this fear of an unnatural | :36:05. | :36:15. | |
risk, like a vaccination. And drugs is another area where people talk | :36:16. | :36:18. | |
about risks, decriminalising them and how dangerous it would be if | :36:19. | :36:22. | |
certain drugs were decriminalised when you think about the effects of | :36:23. | :36:26. | |
alcohol. Politics makes it difficult to make those decisions. Even if you | :36:27. | :36:31. | |
look at the risk analysis. When I was doing regular television, I have | :36:32. | :36:34. | |
lost count of the number of government ministers who would come | :36:35. | :36:36. | |
in and argue against the decriminalisation of drugs, and then | :36:37. | :36:41. | |
say, afterwards, that they are in favour but can't argue it. It is | :36:42. | :36:46. | |
politically impossible. Do you think they should take more notice of | :36:47. | :36:50. | |
possibility? It should certainly be departed the debate. David nuts | :36:51. | :37:01. | |
compared the risks of ecstasy with the risks of horse riding and found | :37:02. | :37:03. | |
that they were comparable. That is when it gets politically difficult, | :37:04. | :37:08. | |
because they start to say things like, may be people think that horse | :37:09. | :37:15. | |
riding is wholesome and taking ecstasy isn't. You are not looking | :37:16. | :37:20. | |
at the risks when you say that, you were making judgements on other | :37:21. | :37:25. | |
values. And because we criminalise drug taking and drug dealing in this | :37:26. | :37:27. | |
country, there is violence associated with it. Do you take | :37:28. | :37:34. | |
these things into account or not? Yes, the association with the | :37:35. | :37:37. | |
criminal underworld and the lifestyle it may encourage. These | :37:38. | :37:42. | |
things are not resolved simply by the probabilities, unfortunately. | :37:43. | :37:45. | |
Thank you very much. Now, after the expenses scandal it | :37:46. | :37:48. | |
was suggested that the public should be given more say over how they | :37:49. | :37:52. | |
could possibly get rid of their MP if they felt they were no longer up | :37:53. | :37:56. | |
to the job. The coalition agreed and have proposed a system whereby an MP | :37:57. | :38:00. | |
can be referred to the Parliamentary Standards committee where their fate | :38:01. | :38:03. | |
is decided. But one Conservative MP feels this doesn't go far enough - | :38:04. | :38:05. | |
here's Zac Goldsmith's soapbox. In the wake of the expenses | :38:06. | :38:31. | |
scandal, all three political parties went into overdrive. The one | :38:32. | :38:36. | |
meaningful promise all of them made was to introduce a system of recall | :38:37. | :38:40. | |
into British politics. This would allow voters to get rid of unwanted | :38:41. | :38:44. | |
representatives at any time. If enough people sign a petition, a | :38:45. | :38:48. | |
recall referendum is held, and people are asked if they want their | :38:49. | :38:52. | |
MP to be recall. If enough people say yes, a by-election is triggered. | :38:53. | :38:58. | |
It is extraordinary that currently if an MP would ignore the voters | :38:59. | :39:02. | |
from the day of their election and break every promise they made and | :39:03. | :39:07. | |
disappear on holiday or even switched to an extremist party, | :39:08. | :39:10. | |
there is nothing the voters can do until the next general election. | :39:11. | :39:14. | |
They would probably have to vote for a party they don't even support. In | :39:15. | :39:19. | |
safe seats, that would be unlikely to remove an underperforming MP. | :39:20. | :39:22. | |
Another system I propose, voters could sack their MP at any time, | :39:23. | :39:28. | |
select a replacement candidate and then vote in a by-election. CU could | :39:29. | :39:33. | |
still have areas that were safe a party, but all MPs are kept on their | :39:34. | :39:39. | |
toes. And the recall could change the dynamic here in Parliament, so | :39:40. | :39:43. | |
once elected, you were pressured by the party hierarchy to toe the line | :39:44. | :39:48. | |
and take the whip, so an MP's task is to hold the executive to account, | :39:49. | :39:53. | |
and under a system of recall, MPs would always know that the most | :39:54. | :39:56. | |
important three line whip is the one imposed by constituents. Last year, | :39:57. | :40:00. | |
the government produced its draft recall Bill, but the proposals don't | :40:01. | :40:07. | |
merely fall short of genuine recall. They are not in any meaningful sense | :40:08. | :40:09. | |
recall at all. Perversely, they will hand power to | :40:10. | :40:18. | |
a parliamentary committee, not to voters, up not down. So once someone | :40:19. | :40:24. | |
complains about the behaviour of an MP, that committee on standards must | :40:25. | :40:29. | |
then decide if the MP has engaged in serious wrongdoing. But how do you | :40:30. | :40:31. | |
even begin to define serious wrongdoing? | :40:32. | :40:37. | |
Recall is not a new concept. It happens all over the world already. | :40:38. | :40:46. | |
Altima -- ultimately it is about democracy and trusting our | :40:47. | :40:49. | |
constituents. I think they need more say. | :40:50. | :40:53. | |
And Zac Goldsmith joins us now. And I should say we ask the Government | :40:54. | :40:57. | |
for an interview on this, but no Minister was available. Not doing | :40:58. | :41:03. | |
very well on those today! If voters don't like their MP, they can get | :41:04. | :41:09. | |
rid of them at the general election. That doesn't work in safe seats. If | :41:10. | :41:13. | |
you have a 20,000 majority, the only way you will get rid of your sitting | :41:14. | :41:19. | |
MP is if everyone votes for someone else. In ironing town, where | :41:20. | :41:26. | |
traditionally people would never vote Conservative, it is too much to | :41:27. | :41:31. | |
suggest that people might switch to voting for the Conservatives to get | :41:32. | :41:37. | |
rid of a candidate they don't like. And for the five years in between | :41:38. | :41:42. | |
elections, there is no method at all where local people can hold their MP | :41:43. | :41:46. | |
to account. But isn't what you are suggesting similar to a kangaroo | :41:47. | :41:51. | |
court? It is not, unless you regard your constituents is forming a | :41:52. | :41:56. | |
kangaroo court. Under recall, any eligible voter is involved in that | :41:57. | :41:59. | |
process, so it is not a tiny bunch of people. But the people who would | :42:00. | :42:05. | |
be able to get a cohort together would be those who are always | :42:06. | :42:08. | |
campaigning, always involved. I'm not saying that there is anything | :42:09. | :42:11. | |
wrong with that, but would you be getting the legitimate views and | :42:12. | :42:17. | |
opinions of your constituents? Lets take my constituency. If 20% of the | :42:18. | :42:21. | |
people signed a petition that would trigger the recall, which involves | :42:22. | :42:23. | |
absolutely everyone, you would need about 16,000 people. My opposition | :42:24. | :42:31. | |
in Richmond are Lib Dems. They would need to get 16,000 people to sign a | :42:32. | :42:36. | |
petition to say that I am so useless, and must be recalled. And | :42:37. | :42:41. | |
then you would need a referendum for everyone to take part in, and over | :42:42. | :42:45. | |
half of them would have to recall me, and so this is not a kangaroo | :42:46. | :42:51. | |
court. Do you think that there is a risk of MPs thinking, particularly | :42:52. | :42:55. | |
in marginal seats, I just won't support something that might be | :42:56. | :42:58. | |
unpopular, because they will kick me out. That is the big and obvious | :42:59. | :43:02. | |
risk. The fact is, in real politics, MPs often have to do | :43:03. | :43:06. | |
things, follow the party whip, which goes against the interests of their | :43:07. | :43:09. | |
constituents or what their constituents would like them to do. | :43:10. | :43:15. | |
That cannot change. If I were an MP under this scheme, I would be | :43:16. | :43:17. | |
petrified that any day the phone was get a ring and I would have to go | :43:18. | :43:21. | |
down and face, if not a kangaroo court, an extremely difficult | :43:22. | :43:26. | |
meeting. And that is the fear that MPs have in relation to recall. But | :43:27. | :43:29. | |
that doesn't happen around the world. I can't find a single example | :43:30. | :43:37. | |
of a successful vexatious campaign. If you are a halfway decent MP, you | :43:38. | :43:42. | |
have nothing to fear through this. You can take a different view to | :43:43. | :43:48. | |
your constituents. I disagree with a lot of my constituents on equal | :43:49. | :43:51. | |
marriage, for example. It is rare for one issue to be a deal-breaker. | :43:52. | :43:58. | |
But would it have cost the expenses scandal? A lot of MPs didn't break | :43:59. | :44:08. | |
the rules, but abuse the system, and a lot of voters would have taken a | :44:09. | :44:11. | |
dim view. One of the reasons people are very rarely recall in systems | :44:12. | :44:18. | |
where recall exists is because you don't make flamboyant, crazy | :44:19. | :44:21. | |
promises before an election, and when you do make promises, you try | :44:22. | :44:24. | |
to keep them, and when you can't, you explain why, and you don't do | :44:25. | :44:30. | |
things that will trigger the ire of your constituents, like paying for | :44:31. | :44:35. | |
duck houses. What is the problem with the Government's plans? It is | :44:36. | :44:38. | |
one of the worst piece of political manoeuvring is I have ever seen in | :44:39. | :44:42. | |
my short career as a politician. It is not recall in a sense that there | :44:43. | :44:47. | |
is no recall vote. There is a small committee of parliamentarians, a | :44:48. | :44:50. | |
kangaroo court imposed by the whip, which decides whether or not MPs | :44:51. | :44:56. | |
qualify for recall. It is only on financial or serious misconduct | :44:57. | :44:59. | |
grounds. The effect is that if you are a maverick, a George Galloway, | :45:00. | :45:04. | |
those kinds of MPs would be thrown to the wolves very easily by this | :45:05. | :45:08. | |
committee, and once qualifies you for recall, you are out. There is no | :45:09. | :45:13. | |
defence at all. What I'm proposing is a genuine system to protect MPs | :45:14. | :45:21. | |
from the 70,000 voters or so in your constituency rather than a few | :45:22. | :45:27. | |
people on a whip. What is it for you? I think a halfway decent MP | :45:28. | :45:33. | |
would not have anything to fear under recall. I hope I am a halfway | :45:34. | :45:39. | |
decent MP. I resent the fact that when I turn on the radio and listen | :45:40. | :45:42. | |
to discussions about politics, when people can call in, the machines | :45:43. | :45:46. | |
fizz with rage. People detest politicians. Under a system of | :45:47. | :45:51. | |
recall, I would have an implied mandate. I would be able to say to | :45:52. | :45:56. | |
anyone in my constituency, found that bad, trigger a recall. If 20% | :45:57. | :46:02. | |
of people want to sign, then I am doing something OK. | :46:03. | :46:18. | |
the standing of Parliament. You could stand in the central lobby | :46:19. | :46:23. | |
this afternoon and asked the first 10 MPs what have you voted on? | :46:24. | :46:29. | |
There was a rebellious intake in 2010. I do not think it is true to | :46:30. | :46:35. | |
say that MPs have not stood on their own platforms. Look at the | :46:36. | :46:41. | |
issue of high-speed rail. If an MP was to say it is a good thing, even | :46:42. | :46:46. | |
though it goes through their constituency, they would be kicked | :46:47. | :46:51. | |
out through recall. The same it would be through in my constituency | :46:52. | :46:55. | |
in relation to Heathrow. But I am one of 650 MPs. If one MP takes a | :46:56. | :47:03. | |
different view, it will not have much of an impact. The backbenchers | :47:04. | :47:08. | |
have been more rebellious and they have been doing their job. | :47:09. | :47:12. | |
Parliament pushes through whatever it was virtually without any | :47:13. | :47:17. | |
scrutiny. Were it not for the fact that we had the house of Lords, our | :47:18. | :47:22. | |
legislation would be full of holes. There is a difference between an MP | :47:23. | :47:26. | |
who is a maverick, like George Galloway, and an MP who has done | :47:27. | :47:33. | |
something wrong. We use the expenses scandal as an example. | :47:34. | :47:37. | |
Would this right to recall differentiate between them? An MP | :47:38. | :47:43. | |
who has committed a crime or has done something illegal... There is | :47:44. | :47:50. | |
machinery in place. You can be summoned, you can be charged within | :47:51. | :47:54. | |
the parliamentary system and you can be forced to stand as an | :47:55. | :48:01. | |
independent. At the moment without breaking any rules at all I could | :48:02. | :48:05. | |
break every promise I made before the election or go on holiday for | :48:06. | :48:10. | |
five years and there is nothing anyone can do. I would be | :48:11. | :48:15. | |
deselected, but I would be the MP for five years with all-expenses | :48:16. | :48:19. | |
paid. In terms of the triggers, at the moment unless you go to jail | :48:20. | :48:25. | |
for more than 12 months, you are still entitled to be an MP. They | :48:26. | :48:29. | |
are going to bring it that threshold down, but that is | :48:30. | :48:34. | |
difficult. MPs have gone to jail, but there have been loved by their | :48:35. | :48:39. | |
constituents. For example Terry Fields, where he thought going to | :48:40. | :48:45. | |
jail was in the interest of his constituents, it should be down to | :48:46. | :48:51. | |
local constituents to decide. Which is the most prominent democracy | :48:52. | :48:56. | |
that uses recalls? Switzerland is the purest one, but the most famous | :48:57. | :49:04. | |
one his Californian -- California and the most famous recall was are | :49:05. | :49:08. | |
not Schwarzenegger and it was the most famous success I can think of. | :49:09. | :49:13. | |
01 Paterson said the opponents of GM foods are wicked. That will be | :49:14. | :49:21. | |
you. You can discuss it forever, but the rice issue he is talking | :49:22. | :49:29. | |
about is a red herring. Regulators in the Philippines had decided not | :49:30. | :49:34. | |
to regulate. The people behind it say it is not ready to be issued to | :49:35. | :49:39. | |
the market yet. The idea that campaigners in the US have got | :49:40. | :49:43. | |
anything to do with slowing the process is in describable a stupid, | :49:44. | :49:49. | |
and it is based on misinformation or ignorance. The moment you have | :49:50. | :49:55. | |
been waiting for. Back to the final two MPs hoping to be elected Deputy | :49:56. | :50:03. | |
Speaker tomorrow. I am surprised we have got them at all because it its | :50:04. | :50:07. | |
bring your constituents to work today. Now it is empty and it is | :50:08. | :50:13. | |
all quiet on the Western Front. You get 30 seconds. Make your pitch. | :50:14. | :50:19. | |
The main job is that of a speaker, the one of deputy is a supporting | :50:20. | :50:24. | |
role, but it is important. I had been a member since 1983, I have | :50:25. | :50:30. | |
been on the chairmen's Panel since 2001 and I fancied having a go at | :50:31. | :50:36. | |
the job of Deputy Speaker. I have served a long apprenticeship and | :50:37. | :50:39. | |
most people in the House have become used to my style which his | :50:40. | :50:44. | |
firm, fair and order with a good sense of humour. Excellent. You do | :50:45. | :50:53. | |
not need to use the full 30. I am competent. I came in in 1983 and | :50:54. | :50:59. | |
have been on the front bench for 10 years and many years as a | :51:00. | :51:03. | |
backbencher. You need somebody who is a master of detail and I have | :51:04. | :51:08. | |
been a barrister. Somebody who is courteous to colleagues is | :51:09. | :51:12. | |
essential. Also you need somebody who is going to have a constructive | :51:13. | :51:16. | |
engagement in a relationship with the Speaker. I have never known | :51:17. | :51:22. | |
anyone in the position who has not been courteous. Maybe you can think | :51:23. | :51:27. | |
of somebody. I can, but not in recent years. You have both been | :51:28. | :51:35. | |
here for a long time, so you should know this these things. An MP must | :51:36. | :51:41. | |
take their oath initially in English, but which languages can | :51:42. | :51:49. | |
they followed this oath with? Well, they could... OK, Henry what is the | :51:50. | :52:00. | |
answer? Greek. Gaelic. It is Scottish and Welsh. I have been | :52:01. | :52:07. | |
there to listen to it. Aside from English, which language can also be | :52:08. | :52:15. | |
used in some of the former Milan -- for realities of the bill. French. | :52:16. | :52:25. | |
Norman French. I speak French. Excellent. You do not get bonus | :52:26. | :52:39. | |
points. Who is the Captain of Gentlemen at Arms. It is not your | :52:40. | :52:46. | |
question. Answer it, Henry. The Chief Whip in the house of Lords. | :52:47. | :52:53. | |
The Government chief whip. Can I have his questions? You will have | :52:54. | :53:00. | |
to now. If it is easy. Can you give me an example of a Command Paper? | :53:01. | :53:06. | |
We have a Command Paper which came out to do with immigration. We had | :53:07. | :53:12. | |
a Command Paper on care of the elderly. That is not that type. The | :53:13. | :53:17. | |
it is on all the subjects we deal with. It is different types of | :53:18. | :53:24. | |
papers prepared by Government and presented with the words by the | :53:25. | :53:30. | |
command of his or her Majesty. Yes. I love it when they say yes. Your | :53:31. | :53:34. | |
odds have shortened, are you pleased by that? Now I am four-to- | :53:35. | :53:40. | |
one behind Eleanor Laing. I think the dark horse is running well on | :53:41. | :53:46. | |
the inside. Are you 100-1 on the outside? I never made predictions | :53:47. | :53:50. | |
about Basildon, so I am not going to make predictions about my | :53:51. | :53:55. | |
chances of becoming Deputy Speaker. I will do my best, it is down to my | :53:56. | :54:01. | |
colleagues. Those are the runners and riders. Has the intrigue got | :54:02. | :54:10. | |
you going? Yes, that is politics as fun with a nice bit of sadism as | :54:11. | :54:18. | |
well. What is the best grounding for wannabe MPs? Should aspiring | :54:19. | :54:22. | |
politicians spend a few years practising law or a bit of banking? | :54:23. | :54:28. | |
Judging by the recent reshuffles it might be best to become a TV | :54:29. | :54:33. | |
presenter first. The new Defence Minister estimate they used to | :54:34. | :54:38. | |
front GMTV. Tristram Hunt is better known as a TV historian. There is | :54:39. | :54:43. | |
Gloria de Piero also on the Labour frontbenchers who was GMTV's | :54:44. | :54:47. | |
political correspondent. They are not the only ones. Hello and Good | :54:48. | :54:54. | |
morning this fine Monday morning. If you fancy... Later on we will | :54:55. | :55:02. | |
talk about inheritance tax. Let's get started with our first subject. | :55:03. | :55:08. | |
Giles. Those closest to Tony Blair have been troubled by the events of | :55:09. | :55:14. | |
last week. Days when the BBC and ITV scheduled Songs of Praise at | :55:15. | :55:17. | |
the same time on Sunday have long gone. 10 years after being sent to | :55:18. | :55:23. | |
Broadmoor, Graham Young poisoned again. Why? A teddy bear is for | :55:24. | :55:34. | |
life, not just for Christmas. There are no hooligans, only citizens | :55:35. | :55:39. | |
defending their lives and property. All it has done is enraged the | :55:40. | :55:47. | |
educational establishment. The hero is tall and handsome, strong and | :55:48. | :55:53. | |
mysterious with a touch of moody. His mother wanted him to take over | :55:54. | :55:58. | |
the running of the estate. A profit of more than ?1 million was in | :55:59. | :56:02. | |
prospect, and all before the Scottish Office had been paid the | :56:03. | :56:06. | |
original purchase price for the land. The train is leaving from | :56:07. | :56:19. | |
Platt from one on the railway carriage game. Fascinating. Can I | :56:20. | :56:30. | |
make a correction, Anna Soubry has gone into defence and Esther McVey | :56:31. | :56:34. | |
is in the work and pensions department. What about you? Not a | :56:35. | :56:41. | |
chance. Would you go into politics? You answer the questions. That is | :56:42. | :56:45. | |
where I can go if it goes horribly wrong. Have you ever thought about | :56:46. | :56:52. | |
it? Not for a heartbeat. They make good MPs because they add telegenic | :56:53. | :56:57. | |
and they are good communicators and there are politicians because they | :56:58. | :57:01. | |
have worked in television. You know what television is like. It is a | :57:02. | :57:07. | |
hotbed. It is not dissimilar to the politics over the road. There are | :57:08. | :57:14. | |
so many parallels in one's daily lives. You have to watch your back, | :57:15. | :57:19. | |
you have to make friends with the right people and steered clear of | :57:20. | :57:24. | |
others. To stay at the top in television is a political balancing | :57:25. | :57:29. | |
act. I can see why they have been attracted, mostly women. Can you | :57:30. | :57:36. | |
see why they are attracted? I bumped into Anna Soubry about 10 | :57:37. | :57:41. | |
days ago and she is uniquely gifted to do that job. She will do very | :57:42. | :57:47. | |
well. You must have seen her on Question Time. Has she been on the | :57:48. | :57:53. | |
show? Yes, there are telegenic and good communicators. But it is less | :57:54. | :57:58. | |
glamourous than television, certainly the transition. That is | :57:59. | :58:02. | |
why I would not dream of going into it because it is such a slog and a | :58:03. | :58:08. | |
better job and it ages you horribly. Look at Barack Obama. That man | :58:09. | :58:14. | |
really has aged before our very eyes. I do not want to see you | :58:15. | :58:19. | |
applying for a seat. I promise you, it is not going to happen. And the | :58:20. | :58:26. | |
answer to our quiz. What did George Osborne claimed 160 million Chinese | :58:27. | :58:34. | |
people were fans of? Boris Johnson, expensive British handbags, Downton | :58:35. | :58:39. | |
Abbey, or Glastonbury? I would love to say Downton added. And I think | :58:40. | :58:46. | |
you will find you are right. You are joking. They are is no prize. | :58:47. | :58:52. | |
Thank you to Richard Madeley. | :58:53. | :58:58. |