Browse content similar to W Stephen Gilbert. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
only be their third win in the Premier League so far. | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
and we'll have much more in Sportsday at half-six. | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
W Stephen Gilbert is a writer and journalist. | :00:00. | :00:18. | |
He used to be a television producers of drama and documentaries, | :00:19. | :00:21. | |
a job he alternated with writing about television, and he wrote an | :00:22. | :00:24. | |
admired biography of the television playwright Dennis Potter. | :00:25. | :00:26. | |
Now he has written a book about Jeremy Corbyn. | :00:27. | :00:28. | |
More of a political pamphlet really, it is subtitled Accidental Hero, | :00:29. | :00:30. | |
and it's a brief introduction to the man who came from relative | :00:31. | :00:33. | |
obscurity to become the most controversial leader of the Labour | :00:34. | :00:36. | |
Stephen Gilbert, why do we need a book like this about Jeremy Corbyn? | :00:37. | :00:54. | |
I mean, many people don't understand where he can have come from, to be | :00:55. | :01:03. | |
A lot people, perhaps most people, would not have heard of him | :01:04. | :01:10. | |
before June, and now he is the leader of Her | :01:11. | :01:13. | |
Majesty's Opposition, and is on the front page of the papers every day. | :01:14. | :01:20. | |
He's the most interesting figure that's | :01:21. | :01:24. | |
come up the pike in British politics for generations, I would have said. | :01:25. | :01:27. | |
He's also, of course, one of the most controversial. | :01:28. | :01:31. | |
He has been, since before his election, the cause | :01:32. | :01:35. | |
of an enormous amount of, you might say vilification, in many cases. | :01:36. | :01:39. | |
What is it that makes him quite so controversial? | :01:40. | :01:45. | |
He represents a wing of the Labour Party that has been out of much | :01:46. | :01:49. | |
He has policies that, although many people in the country support, and | :01:50. | :01:57. | |
indeed have come back to the Labour Party because he espouses them. | :01:58. | :02:03. | |
The anti-austerity position that he takes on the economy, taking the | :02:04. | :02:11. | |
railways and the public utilities back in to public ownership. | :02:12. | :02:14. | |
These are very popular in in the country actually, | :02:15. | :02:20. | |
but they haven't been pushed by the Labour Party for a long time. | :02:21. | :02:23. | |
The Labour Party has moved, a lot of us think, rather to the right. | :02:24. | :02:29. | |
He does seem as if he is playing politics by rules that many of the | :02:30. | :02:33. | |
commentators in the press and the media aren't really familiar with. | :02:34. | :02:36. | |
They don't quite know how to deal with somebody who is from, | :02:37. | :02:39. | |
Well, I think this is where I have an advantage in writing this book. | :02:40. | :02:47. | |
The people who are in the Westminster village, | :02:48. | :02:52. | |
which is deafeningly noisy, don't actually get much perspective, | :02:53. | :03:00. | |
I think, whereas being outside it one can take a more detached view. | :03:01. | :03:03. | |
I think people who inhabit the Westminster village, | :03:04. | :03:05. | |
and that is the columnists, the political reporters, the editors, | :03:06. | :03:10. | |
MPs and peers and their supporters, they are a bit like wild animals. | :03:11. | :03:15. | |
I mean, they all hunt in a pack, and they know the smell | :03:16. | :03:19. | |
of everything, but they don't remember what was said yesterday, | :03:20. | :03:21. | |
They live in the moment, like animals do, and the moment is | :03:22. | :03:27. | |
I don't think they hear what is being thought out in the country. | :03:28. | :03:40. | |
Part of the problem seems to be when he advances arguments | :03:41. | :03:42. | |
on this or anything else, they get drowned out in the noise, | :03:43. | :03:48. | |
the cacophony of criticism, and quite a lot of that seems to be | :03:49. | :03:51. | |
not just about his politics, his positions, but his competence. | :03:52. | :03:56. | |
The argument is he has come from nowhere, he has no experience - a | :03:57. | :03:59. | |
point you yourself make in the book - he has no experience of managing | :04:00. | :04:03. | |
an organisation of diplomacy, he has always been an oppositionist and | :04:04. | :04:05. | |
he's simply not therefore up to the job, complex job of leading | :04:06. | :04:08. | |
a political party, let alone potentially being Prime Minister. | :04:09. | :04:12. | |
The word "incompetent" is very, very loaded. | :04:13. | :04:15. | |
I don't think that Corbyn is incompetent. | :04:16. | :04:23. | |
He may not have obvious managerial skills, but those will come with | :04:24. | :04:26. | |
He will perhaps get more practised at handling people, but he is | :04:27. | :04:37. | |
appealing beyond the Parliamentary party, to the country at large, and | :04:38. | :04:50. | |
I think his authenticity reads much more powerfully for huge numbers | :04:51. | :04:53. | |
of people than any sense of him being incompetent. | :04:54. | :05:00. | |
You make the point in the book that political | :05:01. | :05:02. | |
Nobody saw Corbyn as a potential winner when he was | :05:03. | :05:06. | |
Nobody predicted the SNP landslide in Scotland, but I | :05:07. | :05:09. | |
am going to ask you nonetheless to do a bit of predicting. | :05:10. | :05:12. | |
People say the Labour Party might split, | :05:13. | :05:15. | |
People say Corbyn might be ousted by his fellow MPs, people say all | :05:16. | :05:20. | |
Well, I don't profess to be able to predict the future, | :05:21. | :05:26. | |
unlike almost all of the columnists and correspondents. | :05:27. | :05:28. | |
There are lots of things one can muse about, and I will muse, | :05:29. | :05:31. | |
if you like, I think there is a strong chance that the Parliamentary | :05:32. | :05:35. | |
Labour Party is so detached from reality they will actually somehow | :05:36. | :05:37. | |
Now, if that happens, then my prediction would be that at least | :05:38. | :05:55. | |
a quarter of a million people would immediately leave the party, which | :05:56. | :05:57. | |
is a very good basis, it seems to me, for a new party - what shall we | :05:58. | :06:01. | |
say - the Democratic Socialists, which I hope then Corbyn and | :06:02. | :06:04. | |
McDonnell and perhaps 25 more MPs would immediately resign, and stand | :06:05. | :06:07. | |
for re-election at a by-election, under these new colours. | :06:08. | :06:20. | |
I have had a look at these MPs who might do that, and it's interesting | :06:21. | :06:23. | |
that the great majority of them have very healthy majorities. | :06:24. | :06:26. | |
So the chance they might come back under these new | :06:27. | :06:28. | |
Perhaps there would be a rump of 20 people in the Commons who | :06:29. | :06:42. | |
represent the Democratic Socialists, let us call them that, which is | :06:43. | :06:45. | |
two-and-a-half times as big as the Liberal Democrats in the House. | :06:46. | :06:48. | |
That would be a very good basis, then, for fighting the general | :06:49. | :06:51. | |
election of 2020, as a new party, right across the country. | :06:52. | :06:55. | |
So when people say, do you think Jeremy Corbyn will be | :06:56. | :06:58. | |
My answer is yes, I do, but not necessarily as leader | :06:59. | :07:03. | |
W Stephen Gilbert, thank you very much indeed. | :07:04. | :07:06. |