Browse content similar to 26/04/2012. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Tonight on Newsnight Scotland: Does the First Minister have a | :00:10. | :00:14. | |
tycoon problem? I'll be speaking to the Deputy First Minister and the | :00:14. | :00:18. | |
Labour leader. And some words of advice for | :00:18. | :00:22. | |
aspiring councillors standing in next week's local election. | :00:22. | :00:26. | |
Good evening. Acting as a lobbyist for Rupert Murdoch, or promoting | :00:26. | :00:28. | |
Scotland's economic interests? The First Minister's justification for | :00:28. | :00:35. | |
meeting with the Murdochs is the creation of jobs. | :00:35. | :00:38. | |
This evening it has emerged he failed to disclose a meeting with | :00:38. | :00:43. | |
Mr Murdoch in 2008 in New York. I will be speaking to Johann Lamont | :00:43. | :00:48. | |
and Nicola Sturgeon in a moment. First, Derek Bateman watched the | :00:48. | :00:58. | |
:00:58. | :00:59. | ||
tussle at first ministers' When you are a big hitter, you have | :00:59. | :01:04. | |
to expect to take a few shots yourself. This week, Alex Salmond, | :01:04. | :01:07. | |
Scotland's heavyweight first minister, has suffered a blow after | :01:07. | :01:14. | |
blow. In a flurry of jabs and hay makers, not just from the usual | :01:14. | :01:18. | |
sparring partners, but also from the world champions of the public | :01:18. | :01:28. | |
:01:28. | :01:29. | ||
ring. James Murdoch used his name in the Leveson inquiry. He had | :01:29. | :01:32. | |
offered to beat supportive as sconces politician and leader. | :01:32. | :01:37. | |
there was Donald Trump, flailing wildly. He is denying stories on | :01:37. | :01:42. | |
the front page of the papers today, and it has nothing to do with me. | :01:42. | :01:46. | |
It was all a warm-up for first Minister's Questions. Johann Lamont | :01:46. | :01:53. | |
came out swinging. The revelation that Rupert Murdoch's newspaper | :01:53. | :01:56. | |
hacked Milly Dowler's phone was the moment any doubt was removed, it | :01:56. | :02:02. | |
was the moment the empire started to fall. But the first minister | :02:02. | :02:06. | |
became the only senior politician in this country, perhaps the only | :02:06. | :02:16. | |
:02:16. | :02:22. | ||
one in the world, to invite him 15 years of worshipping at the feet | :02:22. | :02:29. | |
of Rupert Murdoch from the Labour Party, now treating him as a pariah. | :02:29. | :02:39. | |
:02:39. | :02:40. | ||
Refusing to explain... Refusing to explain the contact... What people | :02:40. | :02:48. | |
in Scotland will see when they see Johann Lamont's and the Labour | :02:48. | :02:54. | |
Party's words, they all think of humbug and hypocrisy. He gave his | :02:54. | :02:59. | |
backing to Sir Fred Goodwin in a deal that broke the bank. The deal | :02:59. | :03:04. | |
with Donald Trump, and now Murdoch. There are common themes. Each case | :03:04. | :03:10. | |
was secret. Each deal was a fiasco. And in each case, the truth had to | :03:10. | :03:18. | |
be dragged out of the first minister. Bit by bit. That would be | :03:18. | :03:22. | |
Sir Fred Goodwin. Knighted by Gordon Brown on the advice of Jack | :03:22. | :03:31. | |
McConnell. Donald Trump, up until last Sunday, Donald Trump's | :03:31. | :03:35. | |
argument to the Scottish Government is that we were bound by a deal | :03:35. | :03:39. | |
that he claimed had been made between him and Lord McConnell in | :03:39. | :03:43. | |
the previous administration. kick-boxing Conservative leader | :03:43. | :03:46. | |
harried him over a dinner Old -- dinner in New York with Donald | :03:46. | :03:52. | |
Trump. Did the first minister intentionally mislead Parliament, | :03:52. | :03:58. | |
or did he just forget that at the glory of supping with Murdoch one | :03:58. | :04:07. | |
night, he had been supping with This was a global Scott dinner in | :04:08. | :04:14. | |
New York. Attending the event were the Alexandra Real Estates, the | :04:15. | :04:22. | |
General Electric... Etc, etc. don't think it sounds the likely | :04:22. | :04:29. | |
venue to be exchanging commitments in terms of planning application | :04:29. | :04:36. | |
for five years down the road. a left hook. Is he ashamed that he | :04:36. | :04:40. | |
put his political motives above those of the phone hacking victims? | :04:40. | :04:45. | |
I think the deplorable aspect of phone hacking will be fully dealt | :04:45. | :04:48. | |
with at the inquiry, and I hope fully dealt with by the police | :04:48. | :04:54. | |
force and judicial system on both sides of the border. If Alex | :04:54. | :04:59. | |
Salmond was grubby, it did not show. But -- groggy. But the real damage | :04:59. | :05:09. | |
:05:09. | :05:13. | ||
may be the impression Labour tried No matter how precariously, he | :05:14. | :05:19. | |
retains his crown. I'm joined now by the Deputy First | :05:19. | :05:24. | |
Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, and by the Labour leader, Johann Lamont. | :05:24. | :05:27. | |
Johann Lamont, let's start on this meeting, this business that has | :05:27. | :05:32. | |
come up tonight, in April 2008 that was not declared in a list that the | :05:32. | :05:35. | |
Scottish Government produced. They are throwing their hands up and | :05:35. | :05:38. | |
saying they admit it is a mistake, isn't that fair enough? We made the | :05:38. | :05:44. | |
point that we had not been given the full information. The | :05:44. | :05:47. | |
relationship between the first minister and Rupert Murdoch hadn't | :05:47. | :05:50. | |
been revealed before the Leveson inquiry. We don't know the | :05:50. | :05:53. | |
significance of this admission but we are keen there is as much | :05:53. | :05:57. | |
transparency as possible. Do you think it is a significant | :05:57. | :06:00. | |
admission? It was a mistake and mistakes happen. There was a long | :06:01. | :06:04. | |
list of meetings and this was a simple error of admission and it | :06:04. | :06:09. | |
will be put right. The key thing, and this is the point that Johann | :06:10. | :06:13. | |
Lamont seems to miss, all of the first minister's engagement with | :06:13. | :06:18. | |
Rupert Murdoch, with Skye or anybody else are about promoting | :06:18. | :06:24. | |
Scotland's economic interests. want to deal with this meeting. You | :06:24. | :06:28. | |
have had the explanation that Alex Salmond offered, do you accept it? | :06:28. | :06:31. | |
It is a very odd explanation, it came very late. Your own programme | :06:31. | :06:36. | |
could not get anybody to explain the situation. It was 48 hours when | :06:36. | :06:40. | |
we heard nothing. If it was about jobs, why did we not know that the | :06:40. | :06:46. | |
first minister believed this deal was good for Scotland's jobs? He is | :06:46. | :06:53. | |
very good at arguing. To tell Westminster in his view what should | :06:53. | :06:58. | |
be done, why do we not know this? If it were about jobs, why did he | :06:58. | :07:02. | |
not do it? Why did he not meet with Vince Cable, Jeremy Hunt, if it | :07:02. | :07:09. | |
were about jobs? It seems it is a hard explanation to justify if you | :07:09. | :07:12. | |
look... The 40% ownership, total control, would that make the | :07:12. | :07:22. | |
:07:22. | :07:23. | ||
difference in terms of jobs? We He has been completely transparent | :07:23. | :07:28. | |
in all of his dealings. Rupert Murdoch used to meet with Labour | :07:28. | :07:34. | |
ministers in secret. This nonsense from Johann about nobody knowing | :07:34. | :07:39. | |
Alex Salmond was standing up for jobs - he wrote a letter to James | :07:39. | :07:44. | |
Murdoch a dearer go in January. That was published in August. It is | :07:44. | :07:49. | |
all about jobs. Just because Johann did not see that, just because it | :07:49. | :07:54. | |
does not sit her argument does not mean it does not exist. It was | :07:54. | :08:02. | |
about the takeover. It was about other Skype jobs. The other point | :08:02. | :08:09. | |
is this - the first minister decides he wants to promote jobs in | :08:09. | :08:13. | |
Scotland, and was going on this morning about his call centre | :08:13. | :08:20. | |
opening up. It is not immediately obvious why that has anything to do | :08:20. | :08:26. | |
with supporting Rupert Murdoch taking over BSkyB. What the first | :08:26. | :08:31. | |
minister was prepared to do was argue that the economic interests | :08:31. | :08:37. | |
of the jobs aspect should be taken into account in the decision-making. | :08:37. | :08:41. | |
This call centre is going ahead anyway and it has nothing to do | :08:41. | :08:46. | |
with BSkyB. The first minister believed, I think rightly, that if | :08:46. | :08:50. | |
News Corporation had consolidated its ownership of sky, that would | :08:50. | :08:55. | |
have led to job enhance them. It is not going ahead so we will never | :08:55. | :08:58. | |
know. But he was also concerned about jobs in Glasgow that were | :08:58. | :09:05. | |
under threat because Skype were reducing their contact centres from | :09:05. | :09:08. | |
at nine up to two. He believed that the chance of retaining their jobs | :09:08. | :09:15. | |
in Glasgow would be retained if the takeover went ahead. Alex Salmond | :09:15. | :09:20. | |
has been working hard to make sure that Skype retained the jobs in | :09:20. | :09:28. | |
Scotland. That is what the first minister is there to do. -- Sky. It | :09:28. | :09:33. | |
is a belief that John is not first minister if she does not see that | :09:33. | :09:36. | |
the key role of the first minister is to promote the economic | :09:36. | :09:45. | |
interests of the Scotland. -- Joe one. What is the evidence that was | :09:45. | :09:50. | |
put before the Cabinet in terms of what the author was a from to James | :09:50. | :09:59. | |
Murdoch? What jobs would have come? To one's First Minister's question | :09:59. | :10:04. | |
was predicated on a mistaken belief that there had been job losses. -- | :10:04. | :10:14. | |
:10:14. | :10:14. | ||
Johann. His is perfectly acceptable - and I think you would accept - | :10:14. | :10:17. | |
that it is fine for a first minister to lobby in favour of | :10:17. | :10:21. | |
getting jobs for Scotland. It is another thing to intervene in a | :10:21. | :10:26. | |
takeover. He said he would make the case for the economic argument to | :10:26. | :10:30. | |
be taken into account. Circumstances changed and Jeremy | :10:30. | :10:35. | |
Hunt decided not to refer the bid to the Competition Commission. -- | :10:35. | :10:41. | |
Competition Commission. What led him to believe that somehow jobs | :10:41. | :10:45. | |
would be adversely affected unless they got to own the whole of the | :10:45. | :10:49. | |
company? News Corporation made it clear they wanted to increase | :10:49. | :10:53. | |
employment in Scotland. Any first minister would be keen to encourage | :10:53. | :10:57. | |
that and any First Minister worth their salt would have been keen to | :10:57. | :11:03. | |
do everything possible to protect 800 jobs in this city of Glasgow | :11:03. | :11:07. | |
Vostok in that case, he would not have done it privately, and then he | :11:07. | :11:17. | |
:11:17. | :11:18. | ||
would have done it. They are letters demonstrating... If it were | :11:18. | :11:23. | |
the case that it would protect jobs, he should have had a meeting with | :11:23. | :11:33. | |
Vince Cable or Jeremy Hunt. Murdoch's people said "mission | :11:33. | :11:41. | |
accomplished" and that he was onside. The is and the problem for | :11:41. | :11:45. | |
you and your party that giving you spend that the whole time you were | :11:45. | :11:48. | |
in government crawl into the Murdochs, you are not in a position | :11:48. | :11:58. | |
to criticise? -- isn't the problem. It is all right when you do it but | :11:58. | :12:05. | |
not when they do it? It no, no, I did not say that. I think the Milly | :12:05. | :12:11. | |
Dowler think really pulled people up shockingly. One thing about Alex | :12:11. | :12:16. | |
Salmond was that he won an election in 2007 and was not being supported | :12:16. | :12:26. | |
:12:26. | :12:26. | ||
by the Son. He did not need Murdoch. Nevertheless he has continued. He | :12:26. | :12:30. | |
is the only senior politician who has continued to try to | :12:30. | :12:36. | |
rehabilitate a man... There is no connection between Alex some | :12:36. | :12:41. | |
understanding of four jobs and have the newspaper backing the SNP. | :12:41. | :12:44. | |
lot of people watching this will think that it is obvious what is | :12:44. | :12:48. | |
going on - Alex Salmond was currying favour with Rupert Murdoch | :12:48. | :12:57. | |
because he wanted his paper's backing. The son of back the SNP | :12:57. | :13:03. | |
last year for the same reason hundreds of other people did. -- of | :13:04. | :13:11. | |
the newspaper it back to. We now have a first minister who appears | :13:11. | :13:19. | |
willing to rehabilitate Rupert Murdoch and News International, | :13:19. | :13:24. | |
over which there were three police inquiries, one judicial inquiry... | :13:24. | :13:27. | |
Do you think Alex Salmon should not have tried to protect jobs in this | :13:27. | :13:33. | |
city? Bat is a separate issue and to know that per that be well. You | :13:33. | :13:41. | |
need to explain why, in July this year, six at SNP MPs said... | :13:41. | :13:47. | |
have to stop. We are merely out of time. Presumably you think Jeremy | :13:47. | :13:55. | |
Hunt should resign? Yes, because he had the legal responsibility. | :13:55. | :14:01. | |
you think the Murdochs were right to withdraw their bid or BSkyB? | :14:01. | :14:06. | |
Even though you supported it? was before anybody knew about phone | :14:06. | :14:11. | |
hacking. I am glad they did. The motion supported by the SNP said | :14:11. | :14:16. | |
that the bid should not go ahead. If they've revive their bid in the | :14:16. | :14:23. | |
future, would you be again prepared to lobby, all offer to lobby for | :14:24. | :14:29. | |
them? The Scottish government has a very basic test for anything - is | :14:29. | :14:35. | |
it in Scotland's interests? Do you think Rupert Murdoch and his family | :14:36. | :14:42. | |
are fit and proper people to own it newspapers and TV stations? No. | :14:42. | :14:47. | |
you? I totally condemn what happened with the phone hacking. | :14:47. | :14:53. | |
Yes or no. Rupert Murdoch is a big employers at... We will take that | :14:53. | :14:56. | |
as a yes. Why would anyone want to be a | :14:56. | :15:04. | |
councillor? Given the likes of street lighting, bin collections | :15:04. | :15:10. | |
and to other jobs, this is local level politics. We have been to | :15:10. | :15:20. | |
:15:20. | :15:29. | ||
meet some retiring councillors with Why would anyone want to become a | :15:29. | :15:33. | |
councillor? We are at the bottom end of the political ladder. I have | :15:33. | :15:36. | |
come here to speak to three councillors who are standing down | :15:36. | :15:46. | |
:15:46. | :15:49. | ||
at the next election. Between them, these three have over 60 years | :15:49. | :15:54. | |
experience in office. They believe that personality comes before party | :15:54. | :15:59. | |
politics at a local level. They vote at local government level for | :15:59. | :16:05. | |
the person rather than the party. I am quite sure the three of us would | :16:05. | :16:11. | |
agree that we know of people who are either with Mary's or Ian's | :16:11. | :16:15. | |
party and have voted for me, and they will tell you bluntly that | :16:15. | :16:19. | |
they will not vote for you in the general election because they are | :16:19. | :16:24. | |
voting for you, not the party. you are standing for election next | :16:24. | :16:29. | |
week, it might be worth listening to these old timers. If you are | :16:29. | :16:35. | |
married, your marriage has to be box solid because the partner who | :16:35. | :16:42. | |
is left to to look after the home at all the family - it puts a huge | :16:42. | :16:49. | |
onus on them because you are expecting to be away from that home | :16:49. | :16:54. | |
a lot as the children are growing up. There is homework to do it - | :16:54. | :16:59. | |
there are things to look after, and that is something that candidates | :16:59. | :17:06. | |
often do not think about. I can give one example for a person who | :17:06. | :17:12. | |
elected me at the council elections, and 10 days later it appeared that | :17:12. | :17:19. | |
my house door -- he appeared at my house door and said he did not want | :17:19. | :17:22. | |
to be a councillor any more and had not realised how much work was | :17:22. | :17:27. | |
involved. Despite all the training programmes the parties put people | :17:27. | :17:33. | |
through, when it they actually look... For your job starts at 8am | :17:33. | :17:39. | |
and often does not finish until 11pm. Do you feel like local public | :17:39. | :17:46. | |
property? One of my relaxations was playing golf and even though I say | :17:46. | :17:51. | |
it, I was a good golfer. I am not a good golfer it now because I | :17:51. | :17:58. | |
stopped going. As you would put on your shoes in the car-park, someone | :17:58. | :18:02. | |
would ask to see you about sheltered housing for their parents. | :18:02. | :18:06. | |
You would be thinking about that and you would miss your golf shot! | :18:06. | :18:13. | |
I have had phone calls. I think the earliest I had in the morning was | :18:13. | :18:18. | |
6am and the latest that might was at midnight, when someone phoned me | :18:18. | :18:21. | |
to ask what I was going to do about their cooker that had stopped | :18:21. | :18:29. | |
working. You should have told them to phone an electrician! I came | :18:29. | :18:33. | |
close to telling them something else! What is the one thing you | :18:33. | :18:40. | |
love about being a councillor? Someone came to you with the | :18:40. | :18:44. | |
problem and you were able to sort it out promptly. That brought great | :18:44. | :18:50. | |
satisfaction. Will you miss the influence that you had in the party, | :18:50. | :18:58. | |
to change things? I don't know if I ever had any. I find that really | :18:58. | :19:02. | |
interesting because I know what you mean. I don't think I ever had any | :19:03. | :19:07. | |
influence. You must have because you said you could phone up and | :19:07. | :19:15. | |
improve somebody's life. I could kid them on. A woman friend be once | :19:15. | :19:23. | |
about a hedge that needed to be cut. -- phoned me once. My husband had | :19:23. | :19:27. | |
been taking the call, went out and came back shortly afterwards and | :19:27. | :19:34. | |
said, "she is absolutely thrilled". She was just saying up the head had | :19:34. | :19:44. | |
been cut. One of the things that I did was to get a new sports stadium. | :19:44. | :19:54. | |
:19:54. | :19:57. | ||
We got one last year. 23 years! That shows you the influence. | :19:57. | :20:02. | |
will leave a hole in your life after it made a third, so what will | :20:02. | :20:12. | |
:20:12. | :20:14. | ||
you do next? -- after it 3rd May. collect whisky. I have also | :20:14. | :20:21. | |
collected wine for many years. It is it being a councillor that makes | :20:21. | :20:28. | |
you go to the drink! I am intending on going to watch it Motherwell in | :20:28. | :20:33. | |
the Champions' League. I will do more housework, my husband will be | :20:33. | :20:38. | |
delighted to know, because he has had to do it all these years! I am | :20:38. | :20:43. | |
not very good at that but I will have to do it. I have been saving | :20:43. | :20:48. | |
up to buy a piano and I will perhaps take music lessons and | :20:48. | :20:53. | |
learn to play the piano properly. Over lunch, I got the juicy gossip | :20:53. | :20:58. |