Browse content similar to 12/09/2011. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
As long as there isn't another crisis for eight years, and as long | :00:07. | :00:11. | |
as the Government acts on the advice it has been given, British | :00:11. | :00:15. | |
tax-payers shouldn't be stung into bailing out the banks again. | :00:15. | :00:19. | |
In the bank vaults of Britain, they are getting ready for a lower | :00:19. | :00:24. | |
profit world. But in the City do all the delays | :00:24. | :00:27. | |
and complication buried in today's proposal for reforming banks, mean | :00:27. | :00:31. | |
the party goes on for the bankers. The Government is here to argue | :00:31. | :00:39. | |
that this is the real deal. This FBI agent tells us that the | :00:39. | :00:41. | |
CIA's so-called enhanced interrogation of Al-Qaeda prisoner | :00:41. | :00:46. | |
was waste of time. Not the official view. They prevented the violent | :00:46. | :00:51. | |
deaths of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people. | :00:51. | :00:54. | |
know that Dick Cheney is not saying the truth, because I was there. | :00:54. | :00:57. | |
you are worrying about whether your child getting the attention they | :00:57. | :01:07. | |
:01:07. | :01:10. | ||
need in the early years, relax, or maybe you shouldn't, too risky. | :01:10. | :01:14. | |
It was a decisive moment in the history of attempts to get the | :01:14. | :01:17. | |
taxpayer off the hook for the greed and stupidity of bankers, the | :01:17. | :01:22. | |
Chancellor said today. He didn't use the words "greed" and | :01:22. | :01:28. | |
"stupidity kgs ", that is not his - ", has not his style, we will see | :01:28. | :01:32. | |
how disease yef he is when he acts on the recommendations the | :01:32. | :01:38. | |
commission set up to look into the banks. It will be 2019 before the | :01:39. | :01:44. | |
measures will be implement. - implemented. We better hope they | :01:44. | :01:47. | |
remain sensible until then. It was the absence of this stuff | :01:47. | :01:52. | |
that sank Liamman and Northern Rock, lack of capital, lack the liquid | :01:52. | :01:56. | |
cash. The collapse of the credit system left banks that said they | :01:56. | :01:59. | |
were solid, melting down. Today, the man they picked to design a new | :01:59. | :02:05. | |
banking system laid out his plan. The ring-fence. Only ring-fenced | :02:05. | :02:09. | |
banks would supply the core domestic retail banking services, | :02:09. | :02:13. | |
taking deposits from ordinary individual, and small businesses, | :02:13. | :02:19. | |
and extending overdrafts to them. Ring-fenced banks could not | :02:19. | :02:24. | |
undertake trading, or markets business, or do derivatives. Banks | :02:24. | :02:28. | |
will be split down the middle between stuff the UK packs pair is | :02:28. | :02:32. | |
prepared to bail out, and - taxpayer is prepared to bail out | :02:32. | :02:35. | |
and stuff it is not. For a company like Barclays, right in the firing | :02:35. | :02:41. | |
line t might look like this. Outside the ring-fence dos its | :02:41. | :02:45. | |
giant investment bank, the African banks, the private bank for rich | :02:45. | :02:50. | |
people, and probably the credit card business. And that just leaves | :02:50. | :02:53. | |
the �4.5 billion retail business inside the ring-fence, it is not | :02:53. | :03:00. | |
much. The other big proposal is on how much capital banks have to hold. | :03:00. | :03:08. | |
Modern banks don't actually keep much money in the bank itself. As a | :03:08. | :03:11. | |
result of Vickers they will have to, not inch the actual vault, but that | :03:11. | :03:15. | |
and pieces of paper you can turn into cash quickly. As a result of | :03:15. | :03:20. | |
that they will make less profit. Before the crash, it was typical | :03:20. | :03:25. | |
for UK banks' capital cushion to be under 4% of the money they lent out. | :03:25. | :03:31. | |
Now, under new international rules, called Basel 3, they have to hold | :03:31. | :03:35. | |
7%. For banks big enough to sink sink the economy, Vickers says that | :03:35. | :03:39. | |
should be 10%. There is even more pain, on top of the 10% capital | :03:39. | :03:45. | |
they have to hold there will be another 7-10% of loss-bearing bonds, | :03:45. | :03:49. | |
making 20%. Those who speak for Britain's businesses don't like it. | :03:49. | :03:52. | |
We are very concerned that we will be out of step with the rest of the | :03:52. | :03:56. | |
EU, and potentially elsewhere in the world. Because what's being | :03:56. | :04:00. | |
proposed today is certainly a higher requirement on UK banks than | :04:00. | :04:04. | |
elsewhere, that will add a cost to doing business and banking in the | :04:04. | :04:08. | |
UK. But there are risks involved. One is that the new rules damage | :04:08. | :04:12. | |
competitiveness and profit, not just at the banks, but for the | :04:12. | :04:16. | |
whole UK economy, because the banks are a big part of it. The other, | :04:16. | :04:20. | |
which follows, is that the Treasury then loses money, as banks leg it | :04:20. | :04:24. | |
somewhere else. Some bankers hoped this | :04:24. | :04:29. | |
competitiveness issue might bring the committee itself to water down | :04:29. | :04:34. | |
its conclusions. But, in vain. benefits of reducing the | :04:34. | :04:37. | |
probability of crises of this nature, which a recurring | :04:37. | :04:40. | |
phenomenon with the banking system we have, are absolutely | :04:40. | :04:44. | |
overwhelming. So competitiveness is a tiny part of this. It is very, | :04:44. | :04:48. | |
very important not to get hung up on this one aspects. | :04:48. | :04:52. | |
So now it all comes down to politics. The commission said the | :04:52. | :04:55. | |
proposals might harm some individual banks, but for the UK | :04:55. | :04:59. | |
economy as a whole, the outcome would be neutral. And what the | :04:59. | :05:03. | |
bankers wanted was for the politicians to say they will delay, | :05:03. | :05:07. | |
they will pick and mix, and consult a bit more, and see what other | :05:07. | :05:12. | |
countries do. But in the end, they did more than that. We support the | :05:12. | :05:17. | |
commission's radical reforms, on ring-fencing and regulatory | :05:18. | :05:21. | |
standards. And the Chancellor, who revealingly supports them in | :05:21. | :05:24. | |
principle, we agree with the Business Secretary and support them | :05:24. | :05:27. | |
in practice. We support these measures in principle and will put | :05:27. | :05:30. | |
them into practice through the detailed legislation. You can't | :05:30. | :05:34. | |
support all of this in practice, because it requires detailed | :05:34. | :05:37. | |
legislation, which even John Vickers says is not part of this | :05:37. | :05:42. | |
commission. So, let there be no doubt, we support the Banking | :05:42. | :05:46. | |
Commission's report. We will legislate in this parliament. | :05:46. | :05:53. | |
the deadline for implementation will be 2019. For many of the | :05:54. | :05:59. | |
banks' critics, Vickers did not go far enough. Protestors staged a | :05:59. | :06:04. | |
tableau right in the middle of the bankers' lunchtime, the message, | :06:04. | :06:09. | |
they are zombies on taxpayer life support. Some banking experts want | :06:09. | :06:13. | |
a straight forward split up between investment and retail. We feel the | :06:13. | :06:18. | |
only sure way of making sure there is tho contagion between the | :06:18. | :06:21. | |
essential parts of banks, and the speculative banking part is to | :06:21. | :06:26. | |
split them up. It worked before, it worked in the US, it worked here | :06:26. | :06:32. | |
when these activities were in different companies. These are | :06:32. | :06:34. | |
untried proposals, there is a lot of opportunity to find holes in | :06:34. | :06:38. | |
there, and why on earth does it need eight years to implement. | :06:39. | :06:43. | |
it or not Vickers sets the agenda. The precision detail is yet to come, | :06:43. | :06:48. | |
but Britain is set for the world's most radical shake-up of the banks. | :06:48. | :06:54. | |
Paul is with us in the studio now, as is our political correspondent. | :06:54. | :06:58. | |
If you had to pick winners and losers? One set of losers are | :06:58. | :07:02. | |
people who said consistently Britain can't act before the rest | :07:02. | :07:08. | |
of the world and Europe before regulating the banks. Most notably, | :07:08. | :07:13. | |
algs stair Darling, Gordon Brown and Ed Balls, that is they said in | :07:13. | :07:16. | |
their time in office. That section of the City of London who thought | :07:16. | :07:21. | |
they would get Vickers to water down his own report. At the very | :07:21. | :07:26. | |
last moment of the remit being set, they got inserted into the remit, | :07:26. | :07:28. | |
it mustn't harm British competitiveness and the tax take | :07:28. | :07:33. | |
for the Treasury. Vickers has said it won't. So take it away from | :07:33. | :07:36. | |
there. I think as well, anybody who thinks that George Osborne is just | :07:36. | :07:41. | |
in the pocket of that section of the City. He could have stood up | :07:41. | :07:45. | |
today and said, very interesting, not proven, I will do a bunch of | :07:45. | :07:48. | |
studies that delve into all this evidence, he didn't do this. He | :07:48. | :07:52. | |
said, under pressure, we support the principle and we will enact it. | :07:52. | :07:56. | |
David, there seemed to be quite a lot of cross-party agreement on it | :07:56. | :07:59. | |
today? There absolutely was, that was one of the most striking things | :07:59. | :08:02. | |
about today. In the last general election, if you wanted to get a | :08:02. | :08:05. | |
cheer from a packed public meeting f we have such things any more in | :08:05. | :08:10. | |
the UK, it would be to stay string up the bankers, put them in sacks | :08:10. | :08:14. | |
and stick them in the Thames. We didn't get that today. A lot of the | :08:14. | :08:17. | |
political weather is now talking about how to stop it again, which, | :08:17. | :08:22. | |
of course, is the most important thing to happen. Retribution, | :08:22. | :08:24. | |
however politically expedient and attractive for parties, is not | :08:25. | :08:28. | |
going to get that job done. Indeed the Treasury, though, there is | :08:28. | :08:33. | |
still a lot of jittery people about whether this can be implemented, | :08:33. | :08:37. | |
even on this seven-year term, without doing the things Paul was | :08:37. | :08:41. | |
talking about in his report, about frightening banks off and sending | :08:42. | :08:44. | |
them offshore and taking a less big part in the British economy. What | :08:44. | :08:48. | |
about the Liberal Democrats? That was another striking point about | :08:48. | :08:52. | |
today, Vince Cable couldn't have been more supportive. The hymn | :08:52. | :08:56. | |
sheets were handed round and Vince was singing with the best of them, | :08:56. | :09:00. | |
it could have been conduct bid George Osborne. In the last few | :09:00. | :09:04. | |
months he has been very notable with the hostile things he has been | :09:04. | :09:07. | |
saying about bankers, particularly in interviews. None of that today. | :09:07. | :09:09. | |
What will be particularly interesting is how Liberal | :09:09. | :09:13. | |
Democrats not in the coalition, not in ministerial office react to this, | :09:14. | :09:18. | |
that we won't see for the next few days. Particularly the Liberal | :09:18. | :09:21. | |
Democrat Conference, the first political conference of the main | :09:21. | :09:26. | |
conference season. Next week isn't it? Exactly. | :09:26. | :09:31. | |
Joining us now is the Treasury minister, Mark Hoban, who is | :09:31. | :09:35. | |
financial secretary to the Treasury, that is right isn't it. | :09:36. | :09:39. | |
Are you going to implement all the recommendations in this report? | :09:39. | :09:44. | |
What George Osborne set out today is we would bring in legislation by | :09:44. | :09:48. | |
2015, and all the recommendations would be implemented by 2019. | :09:48. | :09:52. | |
will implement all the recommendations? What he said is | :09:52. | :09:55. | |
we're going to look at Sir John's report over the course of the next | :09:55. | :09:58. | |
few months. It is a complex report, it is a very piece of analysis. | :09:58. | :10:02. | |
There are some issues we need to work our way through, and we will | :10:02. | :10:06. | |
produce our final response towards the end of this year. It is pretty, | :10:06. | :10:11. | |
it is really, in essence, very simple, the separation of retail | :10:11. | :10:14. | |
and investment banking operations and the requirement to hold more | :10:14. | :10:19. | |
capital, both those things you will implement? Yes, George Osborne has | :10:19. | :10:23. | |
been very clear. At the rate at which is said in the report? | :10:23. | :10:27. | |
Absolutely. Because any argument that anyone makes to you about an | :10:27. | :10:32. | |
effect upon competitiveness, or an effect upon taxation would be | :10:32. | :10:36. | |
invalid, wouldn't it, because Professor Vickers has already said | :10:37. | :10:40. | |
so? What we did when we set the terms of reference for John Vickers, | :10:40. | :10:45. | |
was to be very clear about asking him to look at the impact on | :10:45. | :10:48. | |
competitiveness on banks based here in the UK and the impact on taxes. | :10:48. | :10:52. | |
What Sir John has done in his report, the commission's report, is | :10:52. | :10:56. | |
to ensure that for the international activities of UK | :10:56. | :11:02. | |
banks, like Barclays, RBS or HSBC, they will be capital levels set at | :11:02. | :11:05. | |
international standards, but the capital levels for the ring-fenced | :11:05. | :11:09. | |
domestic activities should be set at a higher level. This talk about | :11:09. | :11:15. | |
a need to consult further in all the years up to 2015 and on to 2019, | :11:15. | :11:21. | |
who do you want to consult with? is a hugely complex topic, we need | :11:21. | :11:25. | |
to get it right. I don't think anybody would expect us to | :11:26. | :11:30. | |
implement it overnight. You don't need to know anything else? | :11:30. | :11:34. | |
need to know whether to implement it through regulation or | :11:34. | :11:37. | |
legislation, how you define precisely what is domestic what is | :11:37. | :11:40. | |
international business. Some of the complexties of banking need to be | :11:40. | :11:43. | |
taken into account. We need to make sure we work through properly the | :11:43. | :11:47. | |
costs and benefits of Sir John's work. It is interesting you mention | :11:47. | :11:50. | |
regulation, you are a man who believes in less regulation, aren't | :11:50. | :11:53. | |
you? We have set out, since the coalition Government was formed | :11:53. | :12:00. | |
last year a very clear plan on how we regulate the banking sector. | :12:00. | :12:03. | |
you personally believed there was too much regulation beforehand? | :12:03. | :12:07. | |
have said we believe from the result of the crisis we need to | :12:07. | :12:11. | |
make sure there is proper regulation in place. That is why we | :12:12. | :12:15. | |
are transferring the safety of the banks to the PRA, taking action on | :12:16. | :12:19. | |
consumer protection issues. There is a very clear direction of travel, | :12:19. | :12:23. | |
when it comes to what we are going to do to tackle regulation and the | :12:23. | :12:26. | |
banking sector. Less than a year before the banking crisis hit, you | :12:27. | :12:30. | |
were saying we had to resist arguments for greater regulation? | :12:30. | :12:35. | |
What we need to do is make sure we get the right regulation in place, | :12:35. | :12:38. | |
and make sure we have regulation that needs to increase. You don't | :12:38. | :12:44. | |
deny you said that? We saw what's happened during the banking crisis, | :12:44. | :12:49. | |
we recognise that the regulations didn't work. You said | :12:49. | :12:51. | |
authoritatively then there thank there was no need for greater | :12:51. | :12:55. | |
regulation, you were wrong? We have accepted that. Is there any reason | :12:55. | :12:58. | |
to believe you are any more likely to be right at this time? If you | :12:58. | :13:02. | |
look at the lessons we have learned as a country from the financial | :13:02. | :13:06. | |
crisis. If you look at the impact of the structure of the banking | :13:06. | :13:10. | |
sector on the risk imposed on the British economy. Things should have | :13:10. | :13:14. | |
been addressed a decade ago, they weren't. We have picked up the | :13:14. | :13:19. | |
lessons and want to reimplement them through John Vickers work, and | :13:19. | :13:22. | |
through the work happening internationally and the domestic | :13:22. | :13:25. | |
reform programme. Do you want to join Ed Balls and the apology he | :13:25. | :13:28. | |
made earlier today for the Government as failure last time | :13:28. | :13:33. | |
round, there was a failure in opposition too? We can all hold our | :13:33. | :13:38. | |
hand up to what happened prior to the financial crisis A number of | :13:38. | :13:43. | |
people missed it. What we have done is tackle the issues. Nobody was | :13:43. | :13:46. | |
prepared to address the structure of banking until we got into office. | :13:46. | :13:49. | |
We have asked the questions about what does it mean to have a big | :13:49. | :13:53. | |
banking sector in the UK what do we need to do to reform the regulatory | :13:53. | :13:56. | |
system in the UK. Questions the previous Government weren't | :13:56. | :14:01. | |
prepared to ask. With us now is Peter McNamara, the | :14:01. | :14:07. | |
former head of corporate strategy at Lloyd's TSB, Will Hutton, who | :14:07. | :14:13. | |
submitted his own sub miss to the John Vickers committee - | :14:13. | :14:15. | |
submissions to the John Vickers committee. | :14:15. | :14:19. | |
This should save banking, shouldn't it? Well, there is a very | :14:20. | :14:23. | |
interesting position, middle of the road, that has been adopted. As we | :14:23. | :14:28. | |
heard in the earlier piece, there were two choices behind the | :14:28. | :14:31. | |
Government at one fundamental level, one was to completely separate the | :14:31. | :14:36. | |
retail and investment banking wings. The other one was to do nothing but | :14:36. | :14:39. | |
impose tougher regulatory hurdles in terms of capital requirements. | :14:39. | :14:43. | |
What they have said is go for a middle role, build something we | :14:43. | :14:49. | |
call a ring-fence around the retail piece, and what we will do is | :14:49. | :14:54. | |
impose hire capital requirement - higher capital requirements. Do you | :14:54. | :14:58. | |
think it will work? It is difficult to get all the detail around this. | :14:58. | :15:02. | |
That is why it will take some years to implement. Will Hutton your | :15:02. | :15:09. | |
knees are knocking already? Look, I disagree very strongly with that. I | :15:09. | :15:13. | |
think, given where we are internationally, to ring-fence was | :15:13. | :15:17. | |
probably as far as you could push it. This will be good for the | :15:17. | :15:23. | |
economy at large, I don't agree that actually ring-fencing in of | :15:23. | :15:27. | |
itself is going to damage recovery. What might damage recovery is if | :15:27. | :15:31. | |
you actually push capital up too quickly, but there is no reason to | :15:31. | :15:34. | |
do that. You get the legislation, you do the ring-fencing, the ring- | :15:34. | :15:39. | |
fencing, I think, will create a part of the British banking system | :15:39. | :15:42. | |
that will consecrate itself and devote itself to lending to British | :15:42. | :15:46. | |
business and consumers, they will do that better than in the past, | :15:46. | :15:50. | |
they will be less tempts to go into the Wild West of the casino banking, | :15:50. | :15:55. | |
and then we can bring in higher capital as and when it is | :15:55. | :15:58. | |
appropriate. If the capital regime was high now, I would be argue to | :15:58. | :16:04. | |
go lower it. I'm hardly, you have to separate these two things out. | :16:04. | :16:10. | |
Bringing capital in could be prematurely, ring-fencing in itself | :16:10. | :16:14. | |
is not a problem. Do you fear, as some of your colleagues do, that | :16:14. | :16:18. | |
this will make banking so safe, it will be very hard for banks to | :16:18. | :16:23. | |
lend? I think it is a dodge. I think that this is completely | :16:23. | :16:29. | |
beside the real issue facing the country. What is beside the real | :16:29. | :16:33. | |
issue? That is how to grow the economy. That is what we should | :16:33. | :16:37. | |
spend owl of our time focusing on. We shouldn't keep an eye on the | :16:37. | :16:41. | |
banks at all? The important issue is how to get the economy growing | :16:41. | :16:45. | |
again. If I had to make a choice, as a nation we can only choose one | :16:45. | :16:48. | |
thing right now, strong banks or strong economy. It is clear we have | :16:49. | :16:53. | |
to be, we know growing the economy is about growing SMEs, and | :16:53. | :16:56. | |
therefore, particularly for the banks that we own, we should be | :16:56. | :17:01. | |
holding them to the lending targets, which I don't, I'm extremely | :17:01. | :17:04. | |
sceptical that the lending targets that everybody says are being met | :17:04. | :17:10. | |
are being met. One of the reasons why they are not being met is banks | :17:10. | :17:15. | |
can put the scarce capital they have got at the moment, behind any | :17:15. | :17:18. | |
proposition anywhere in the world. Once you ring-fence and say that is | :17:18. | :17:22. | |
the amount of money sitting behind British business lending they have | :17:22. | :17:27. | |
to do it. They are not tempted. That is a hopeless...The Fact of | :17:27. | :17:32. | |
the matter is this will never see the light of day, and we will get | :17:32. | :17:38. | |
so wrapped up in the complexity, carving up this and that, and the | :17:38. | :17:42. | |
economy seven years later will be no better off, and the SMEs won't | :17:42. | :17:47. | |
have the capital they need to grow their business. In seven years time. | :17:47. | :17:51. | |
Why not get the banks on here and question them on Newsnight whether | :17:51. | :17:56. | |
or not they are lending to people. The reason we don't have bankers on | :17:56. | :18:00. | |
the programme very often is they won't come on. There is a real | :18:00. | :18:03. | |
question of banks making themselves accountable publicly? There is a | :18:03. | :18:08. | |
lot of them, find ones that will. can tell you, most of our | :18:08. | :18:12. | |
researchers spend much of the day on the phones to banks across the | :18:12. | :18:15. | |
land, they put their heads down. That is the big problem with | :18:16. | :18:20. | |
banking, and its advocates in this country. Bank something not the | :18:20. | :18:24. | |
only industry, nor manufacturing, digital, content, IT, we have a | :18:24. | :18:29. | |
whole wealth of expertise, and growing entrepeneurs, these | :18:29. | :18:33. | |
businesses need lending. We need to feed them. The absolutely critical | :18:33. | :18:37. | |
point at the moment in the economy is to kick start the private sector | :18:37. | :18:41. | |
in a much bigger way than we have done. Without that we will suffer | :18:41. | :18:45. | |
severe unemployment as the public sector contracts. One of the major | :18:45. | :18:50. | |
concerns of doing that is to give enough incentive to the banks, and | :18:50. | :18:55. | |
to entrepeneurs, to lend and create that employment. Frankly, dare I | :18:55. | :18:58. | |
say it, if you have to choose, probably the balance is quite right, | :18:58. | :19:03. | |
that you have to push the economy of the private sector harder and | :19:03. | :19:07. | |
faster at the moment in the cycle, than we probably thought three | :19:07. | :19:12. | |
years ago when the banking crisis developed. Now, if you are going to | :19:12. | :19:17. | |
constrain that activity, you are facing both the disadvantage that | :19:17. | :19:20. | |
you may lose some of the capital which is required and the lending | :19:20. | :19:24. | |
required into that sector, and you won't get the growth without it. | :19:24. | :19:31. | |
is just the Council of Despair. The idea that the choice between bank | :19:31. | :19:37. | |
reform and growing the economy is completely false. It is a canar put | :19:37. | :19:41. | |
up by most people who want to protect an indefensible business | :19:41. | :19:45. | |
model. Bank assets in this country is four times the GDP, it is huge | :19:45. | :19:48. | |
in relation to that. There is a permanent risk of another banking | :19:48. | :19:52. | |
crisis we have to do something to make uer system safer. This is | :19:52. | :19:57. | |
something on the table, which is feasible, which will not actually, | :19:57. | :20:01. | |
ring-fencing will not damage flows of credit to the private sector. | :20:01. | :20:05. | |
Financial services are a global industry, we can't regulate at | :20:05. | :20:08. | |
national level. The simple fact of the matter is getting our economic | :20:08. | :20:12. | |
house in order, should there be another cry sifs any sort, it will | :20:12. | :20:17. | |
always come a different way - crisis of any sort will always come | :20:17. | :20:21. | |
in a different way than the one before. Why not have national | :20:21. | :20:24. | |
surplus, then we can stand whatever shock it comes the other way. | :20:24. | :20:28. | |
is lots of ways to make the economy grow, quantitative easing, fiscal | :20:28. | :20:32. | |
policy, building institutions that support entreprenurialism. You | :20:32. | :20:37. | |
don't have to live with a chronically unsafe banking system. | :20:37. | :20:41. | |
Ring-fencing in itself won't damage credit flows to the private sector. | :20:41. | :20:45. | |
Inappropriate increases in capital too quickly might be, but my God, | :20:45. | :20:49. | |
you have as much chance of that as pigs flying. We have heard from | :20:49. | :20:53. | |
Mark Hoban, it will take until 2019 to do that. The simple fact is this | :20:53. | :20:57. | |
will never come into effect. That is a strong statement, why say that. | :20:57. | :21:03. | |
The split between retail banking and investment banking, I don't | :21:03. | :21:07. | |
believe it will ever come into effect. The complexity and gran | :21:07. | :21:11. | |
laterity will wrap itself into it, we will become focused on getting | :21:11. | :21:21. | |
:21:21. | :21:23. | ||
the economy moving, let's drop it. Everyone is getting excited by the | :21:23. | :21:26. | |
savings, and taking vast amounts of money from the taxpayer, you say | :21:26. | :21:30. | |
the mechanism won't work? I don't believe it will come into effect. | :21:30. | :21:36. | |
Is that a lack of will on to the banks or just generally? Listening | :21:36. | :21:40. | |
to the level of complexity that needs to be decided, there will be | :21:40. | :21:45. | |
years of deciding through that complexity. Meanwhile the point is, | :21:45. | :21:49. | |
industries changing and evolving constantly and bypassing, as | :21:49. | :21:52. | |
innovation always does to regulation. The minister is not | :21:52. | :21:55. | |
taking part in this discussion, do you want to respond to that, will | :21:55. | :21:58. | |
you make it happen? We have said very clearly we will legislate by | :21:59. | :22:03. | |
2015 and the reforms will be in place by 2019. I disagree with Judy | :22:03. | :22:08. | |
as point, strong banks or a small economy. We need strong banks to | :22:08. | :22:11. | |
have a strong economy. These reforms will strengthen the banking | :22:11. | :22:15. | |
system and make the economy stronger than in the past. Heretic | :22:15. | :22:20. | |
point, this ring-fencing is not going to happen, she says? We will | :22:20. | :22:27. | |
legislate by 2015, implemented by 2019. We have been crystal law - | :22:27. | :22:31. | |
clear on it. George Osborne, Vince Cable, parliament is very clear, | :22:31. | :22:37. | |
this is going to happen. Let's talk about one thing straight away, | :22:38. | :22:41. | |
there is no co-relation between strengthening the bank and | :22:41. | :22:45. | |
supporting industry. You can have very strong banks that don't lend. | :22:45. | :22:50. | |
That is how you make them strong, reduce the risks and exposure to | :22:50. | :22:54. | |
lending, they become strong. That is not helpful to the economy | :22:54. | :22:58. | |
gearing up and the growth of the private sector. That growth has to | :22:58. | :23:02. | |
be inserted into the retail piece. If you price that retail piece of | :23:03. | :23:06. | |
the business, disadvantage at that stageously, against the other | :23:06. | :23:13. | |
components of the - disadvantageously, against other | :23:13. | :23:16. | |
components of the business. The most damming thing that could be | :23:16. | :23:22. | |
done. People will lose jobs because of this. They won't grow. If you | :23:22. | :23:26. | |
said ring-fenced, deposits have to remain in that. John Vickers made | :23:26. | :23:29. | |
the point, that money will be available for lending to banking, | :23:29. | :23:34. | |
because it is ring-fenced in the entity, rather than being used to | :23:34. | :23:37. | |
support international activity. John Vickers made that point clear | :23:37. | :23:42. | |
in his report. Let's look at that point, if you are lending money, | :23:42. | :23:45. | |
longish term to either small businesses or people to die their | :23:45. | :23:49. | |
houses, the borrowing of short-term money from deposit orators from | :23:49. | :23:54. | |
savings and current accounts won't fund. That straight away d | :23:54. | :23:56. | |
depositors, from savings and current accounts won't fund it. | :23:57. | :24:00. | |
That straight away is the balance of short-term needs of customers | :24:00. | :24:05. | |
against the long-term needs of the bank. Then you are starting to | :24:05. | :24:10. | |
constuct derivative structures inside your bank, running contrary | :24:10. | :24:15. | |
to the ring-fencing. If nothing was booming at this point in time. | :24:15. | :24:19. | |
your proposal to do nothing, saying it is all so difficult and | :24:19. | :24:22. | |
complicated, we can't act and make decisions and come to conclusion | :24:22. | :24:27. | |
about this complexity, it has to stand, nothing must happen s that | :24:27. | :24:33. | |
your point. Not at all. What is your point. At this point in the | :24:33. | :24:36. | |
cycle, the UK growth and creation of employment is the paramount | :24:36. | :24:40. | |
importance. The strength of banks is probably something that you | :24:40. | :24:44. | |
can't wholly address with a complex piece of legislation, only within | :24:44. | :24:49. | |
the UK. Because what type of crisis are hitting banks as we speak at | :24:49. | :24:53. | |
the moment. In the rest of the European area. British banks may be | :24:53. | :24:58. | |
safer as a result of this. Very quickly. Very quickly at the moment | :24:58. | :25:02. | |
banks are hit by sovereign debt problems. Quite outside anything | :25:02. | :25:07. | |
that is in this one. That is causing instability in Europe, and | :25:07. | :25:10. | |
the InterBank markets which, we are forced to operate in, because all | :25:10. | :25:13. | |
of this legislation applies around the European economic area. So you | :25:13. | :25:17. | |
do nothing. Failing bank in the rest of Europe can be contagious to | :25:17. | :25:20. | |
the UK. Thank you very much indeed. | :25:20. | :25:23. | |
The terrorist attacks which occurred a decade ago yesterday, | :25:23. | :25:27. | |
the single greatest outrage in modern history, could not have been | :25:27. | :25:32. | |
prevented, and obliged the United States to use practices like | :25:32. | :25:37. | |
waterboarding, because there was no alternative. Wrong, according to an | :25:37. | :25:43. | |
FBI agent who worked at the heart of the operation against Al-Qaeda. | :25:43. | :25:48. | |
Ali Soufan was present at the site where top Al-Qaeda suspects were | :25:48. | :25:52. | |
tortured. He said former officials haven't told the truth about the | :25:52. | :25:56. | |
effectiveness of practices like waterboarding, or whether 9/11 | :25:56. | :26:00. | |
itself could have been forestalled. He has given this only British | :26:00. | :26:08. | |
interview to us. Stepping out of the shadows, | :26:08. | :26:12. | |
appearing for the first time on camera, Ali Soufan, the former FBI | :26:12. | :26:20. | |
agent, with an eyewitness account some people don't want him to tell. | :26:20. | :26:24. | |
They are trying to stop me and others from telling the world what | :26:24. | :26:32. | |
really happened over there. He believes huge mistakes were made, | :26:32. | :26:39. | |
with devastating consequences. happened because we failed to | :26:39. | :26:43. | |
prevent it from happening. We were looking for them overseas, they | :26:43. | :26:49. | |
were here. People in our Government knew they were here. | :26:49. | :26:55. | |
He was the interrogator who saw the CIA try to break a key terrorist | :26:55. | :27:05. | |
:27:05. | :27:11. | ||
suspect, and fail. What happened here at Ground Zero | :27:11. | :27:15. | |
has prompted a fierce debate. Could it have been prevented and did | :27:15. | :27:19. | |
America go too far in trying to stop it happening again? Now, for | :27:19. | :27:23. | |
the first time, we can hear from the man who interrogated some of | :27:24. | :27:27. | |
Al-Qaeda's most important figures, who was on their trail before 9/11, | :27:27. | :27:30. | |
and who was there when the gloves came off in the fight against | :27:30. | :27:38. | |
terrorism. Ali Soufan joined the FBI's New | :27:38. | :27:43. | |
York office in the mid-1990s. He had been assigned to the team | :27:43. | :27:48. | |
gathering evidence against a new emerging threat. Born in Lebanon, | :27:48. | :27:52. | |
Sofuan had emigrated to America as a teenager, he was one of the only | :27:52. | :27:57. | |
Arabic speakers in the FBI, and was picked out by his boss to be | :27:57. | :28:04. | |
deployed across the world, in pursuit of Al-Qaeda. | :28:04. | :28:10. | |
This is a brick from the facility where Bin Laden got his official | :28:10. | :28:16. | |
brief from shaik Mohammed on 9/11. Sofuan's search for answers about | :28:16. | :28:22. | |
9/11 began the day after the attacks. He was in Yemen, where he | :28:22. | :28:26. | |
had been investigating Al-Qaeda's womaning the previous year of a US | :28:26. | :28:30. | |
warship - bombing the previous year of a US warship. He tried to | :28:30. | :28:37. | |
unravel the spider's web of Al- Qaeda's network. On September 12th | :28:37. | :28:41. | |
a CIA officer passed him an envelope. What was in there, | :28:41. | :28:45. | |
shocked Sofuan, there were details of two of the 9/11 hijackers that | :28:45. | :28:51. | |
the CIA had failed to pass on. think it was probably the worst | :28:51. | :28:55. | |
feeling that I have ever experienced in my life. It is a | :28:55. | :29:05. | |
:29:05. | :29:05. | ||
combination of frustration, anger, sadness, betrayal. I did not know | :29:05. | :29:10. | |
how to react. The only thing I recall is I left the office, went | :29:10. | :29:20. | |
across the hall to a bathroom, and I just threw up. | :29:20. | :29:24. | |
The CIA folder included intelligence on meetings in Asia, | :29:24. | :29:28. | |
involving people Sofuan was investigating, and the two men who | :29:28. | :29:32. | |
were involved in 9/11. The CIA knew the two had entered the US months | :29:32. | :29:37. | |
before the attacks. But despite repeated requests, it did not share | :29:37. | :29:41. | |
all it knew with the FBI. What makes you so sure it would | :29:41. | :29:45. | |
have made a difference? We were looking for them overseas, they | :29:45. | :29:50. | |
were here. People in our Government knew they were here. We were not | :29:50. | :29:57. | |
told. It still makes you angry? Absolutely. I will be angry until | :29:57. | :30:04. | |
the day I die about this. I mean look how many people died. Look how | :30:04. | :30:14. | |
:30:14. | :30:17. | ||
the world changed. Look how we Within months of 9/11, the Taliban | :30:17. | :30:21. | |
and Al-Qaeda were ousted from Afghanistan. America began to round | :30:21. | :30:29. | |
up hundreds of suspected terrorists. But the top Al-Qaeda leaders | :30:29. | :30:36. | |
escaped, until in early 20002, President Bush made a dramatic | :30:36. | :30:41. | |
announcement. We recently apprehended one of Al-Qaeda's top | :30:41. | :30:51. | |
:30:51. | :30:51. | ||
leaders, a man named Abu Zebaida, he was spending one of the top | :30:51. | :30:56. | |
operating officials of Al-Qaeda, plotting and planning murder. He's | :30:56. | :31:06. | |
:31:06. | :31:12. | ||
not plotting and he's not planning He's under lock and key. We're | :31:12. | :31:22. | |
:31:22. | :31:23. | ||
going to give him some company. That company included Ali Soufan. | :31:23. | :31:29. | |
His expertise in interrogation and Al-Qaeda led him to be sent to the | :31:29. | :31:34. | |
secret CIA site where he was held. Sofuan can still not disclose the | :31:34. | :31:40. | |
location, although we believe it to be Thailand. He was definitely | :31:40. | :31:48. | |
still in pain, and it was a major surgery. Sofuan found Zubada in bad | :31:48. | :31:56. | |
shape, having been shot during his capture. Death is not an option a | :31:56. | :32:00. | |
CIA cable set out. Sofuan set about trying to obtain his secrets, it | :32:00. | :32:04. | |
didn't take long. We were getting actionable intelligence, this had | :32:04. | :32:11. | |
the possibility of saving lives. This included the identity of the | :32:11. | :32:15. | |
mastermind of 9/11. But even though Sofuan had got him to talk, some in | :32:15. | :32:22. | |
Washington believed Zubada knew more. Abu Zubada was about to | :32:22. | :32:29. | |
become the guinea pig for what the CIA called enhanced interrogation | :32:29. | :32:33. | |
techniques. The idea was that the detainee has to look at the | :32:33. | :32:38. | |
interrogator as if he's his God. He's the one who terms if his life | :32:38. | :32:46. | |
is going to be better, or worse. He had a set of techniques at the time, | :32:46. | :32:54. | |
these techniques were nudity, low level sleep depravation, up to 24 | :32:54. | :33:03. | |
hours, loud music and so forth. Sofuan, who lost friend on 9/11, | :33:03. | :33:13. | |
:33:13. | :33:17. | ||
had practical, rather than moral objections. I will not lose sleep | :33:17. | :33:21. | |
if a terrorist is nude, it won't work, it won't work on a top notch | :33:21. | :33:27. | |
terrorist. My experience is you can watch way more flies with honey | :33:27. | :33:34. | |
than vinegar. By now, Sofuan had interrogated | :33:34. | :33:39. | |
many Al-Qaeda operatives, trained to resist torture. There is a | :33:39. | :33:42. | |
different emotional button that you have to press to make them co- | :33:42. | :33:47. | |
operate, sometimes it is family, sometimes it is ideologies, however, | :33:47. | :33:51. | |
even when you think you are having very good relationships with them, | :33:51. | :33:58. | |
in a split of a second you ask some questions. Now if you see me | :33:58. | :34:04. | |
outside you will kill me, absolutely, they will tell you they | :34:04. | :34:09. | |
will slaughter you like a sheep. The treatment of Zubada had | :34:09. | :34:13. | |
intensified, Sofuan had enough? were seeing some stuff, if it | :34:13. | :34:16. | |
happened in America, the person would be arrested. Absolutely, it | :34:16. | :34:21. | |
is an abuse of a prisoner. He threatened to arrest the CIA | :34:21. | :34:27. | |
contractor who was leading the interrogation. The FBI told him to | :34:27. | :34:33. | |
come home. Zubada was then water boarded 83 times. | :34:33. | :34:36. | |
interrogations were used on hardened terrorists after other | :34:36. | :34:39. | |
efforts failed, they were legal, essential, justified, successful | :34:39. | :34:43. | |
and the right thing to do. The intelligence officers who | :34:43. | :34:47. | |
questioned the terrorists can be proud of the work, proud of the | :34:47. | :34:50. | |
results, because they prevented the violent death of thousands, perhaps | :34:50. | :34:57. | |
hundreds of thousands of people. Are you saying that Dick Cheney is | :34:57. | :35:01. | |
lying? I know that Dick Cheney is not saying the truth, I was there. | :35:01. | :35:07. | |
Everything the proponent of enhanced interrogation techniques | :35:07. | :35:12. | |
claim that was obtained, because of enhanced interrogation techniques | :35:12. | :35:19. | |
and waterboarding Zubada, we got when we were on the ground this, | :35:19. | :35:22. | |
before enhanced interrogation techniques existed. Back in the US | :35:22. | :35:26. | |
Sofuan went undercover, pretending to be a personal representative of | :35:26. | :35:33. | |
Osama Bin Laden in America. It was to be his last assignment. | :35:33. | :35:40. | |
Ali Soufan left the FBI frustrated, prevented, he felt, from doing his | :35:41. | :35:50. | |
job. His attempts to tell his story now, and counter who he sees as a | :35:50. | :35:58. | |
misguided narrative of 9/11 are also being met stubborn resistance. | :35:58. | :36:05. | |
Sofuan has a book published today, the CIA demanded many cuts, it is | :36:05. | :36:09. | |
an apart of a wider attempt to control the official version of | :36:09. | :36:19. | |
:36:19. | :36:19. | ||
9/11 and the last ten years. People over there are reacting | :36:19. | :36:28. | |
narrative, not national security information. | :36:28. | :36:38. | |
:36:38. | :36:38. | ||
I always tell myself, hopefully time will heal. Ten years later, it | :36:38. | :36:48. | |
:36:48. | :36:54. | ||
The CIA told us today that any suggestion the CIA purposely | :36:54. | :36:58. | |
refused to share critical lead information on the 9/11 plot, with | :36:58. | :37:02. | |
the FBI is baseless, and the suggestion that the Central | :37:02. | :37:08. | |
Intelligence Agency has requested redactions on this publication, | :37:08. | :37:17. | |
because it doesn't like the content is ridiculous. They refused to | :37:17. | :37:20. | |
comment on the waterboarding allegations. If you want a child to | :37:20. | :37:24. | |
get on you must focus on them intensely since they were born. The | :37:24. | :37:28. | |
idea that you have to shape their development by the age of three is | :37:28. | :37:32. | |
under attack. It is now being claimed that the fevered attentions | :37:32. | :37:36. | |
of anxious parents may be unnecessary. The suggestion is, of | :37:36. | :37:41. | |
course, a great comfort to every run ragged parent in the land. But | :37:41. | :37:45. | |
is it true that benign neglect could be as helpful as eager | :37:45. | :37:54. | |
intervention. Life's busy enough as a toddler, | :37:54. | :37:59. | |
there is walking and talking to be mastered, and a crashing weight of | :37:59. | :38:03. | |
parental ambition to be carried. For those short years at the start | :38:03. | :38:08. | |
of life are said to be crucial for social and academic development. | :38:08. | :38:12. | |
Studies by neuroscientists measuring activity in the brain, | :38:12. | :38:16. | |
have provided the foundation for early years intervention by the | :38:16. | :38:24. | |
state. The last Government pioneered this focus with | :38:24. | :38:30. | |
initiatives including the Sure Start programme, and an early years | :38:30. | :38:32. | |
curriculum. The coalition Government has | :38:32. | :38:38. | |
continued to advocate an early years approach. On the cover of one | :38:38. | :38:44. | |
proper was this photograph of two brains, suggesting there was no | :38:44. | :38:47. | |
doubt how vital early intervention was. The report cited studies | :38:47. | :38:52. | |
claiming that a child's development score at a mere 22 months, could | :38:52. | :38:56. | |
serve as an accurate predictor of educational outcomes at 26 years. | :38:56. | :39:01. | |
It also suggested that boys judged at the age of three as being "at | :39:02. | :39:07. | |
risk" had two-and-a-half times as many criminal convictions at aged | :39:07. | :39:13. | |
21 as those deemed "not at risk". But tomorrow, a conference at the | :39:13. | :39:18. | |
University of Kent, will call into question the focus on this early | :39:18. | :39:22. | |
years strategy. They want less Government intervention at this age, | :39:22. | :39:26. | |
and suggest it is time parents calmed down about the importance of | :39:26. | :39:33. | |
childhood. With us now is Lee director of | :39:33. | :39:36. | |
parenting studies at the University of Kent, helping to organise that | :39:36. | :39:40. | |
conference. And the psychologist, Oliver James, joins us from Oxford. | :39:40. | :39:45. | |
Why do you think this emphasis on the first years wrong? It is a very | :39:45. | :39:50. | |
old prejudice, that is the first thing to say, it is certainly | :39:51. | :39:53. | |
predating anything that anybody says they have found out recently. | :39:53. | :39:59. | |
It is at least 300 years old. I think what has gone on more | :39:59. | :40:04. | |
recently, though. There is an increasingly moralistic dynamic to | :40:04. | :40:09. | |
claims about the early years. So increasingly shrill claims are made | :40:09. | :40:13. | |
if parents don't heed by what is said, then really terrible things | :40:13. | :40:18. | |
will happen to their children. It is becoming increasingly politic | :40:18. | :40:22. | |
sized. Neither side can demonstrate it is wrong? The claim about | :40:22. | :40:29. | |
neuroscience is entirely wrong, there is no new neuroscience that | :40:29. | :40:33. | |
tells us if parents don't do things with little children their brains | :40:33. | :40:37. | |
will be shrunk. It is an unwarranted claim, it is better | :40:37. | :40:43. | |
understood as neurononsense or neuromania, than any sense nl | :40:43. | :40:50. | |
argument about anything. - Sensible argument. I don't know | :40:50. | :40:53. | |
why we are discussing it on Newsnight, it is a completely | :40:53. | :40:56. | |
accepted fact by people who have read the evidence, which DrLy low | :40:56. | :41:03. | |
hasn't. The quality of care you have in - Dr Lee hasn't. The | :41:03. | :41:08. | |
quality of care you have in your early years reflects your adult | :41:08. | :41:12. | |
life. Particularly emotional development. If you look at page | :41:12. | :41:16. | |
335 of my book, you will see 30 studies which show quite clearly | :41:16. | :41:20. | |
and without question, that the earlier the damage is done, the | :41:20. | :41:26. | |
earlier a child is maltreated, not loved, abused and neglected, the | :41:26. | :41:30. | |
earlier it is neglected, the more likely it is to suffer all sorts of | :41:30. | :41:35. | |
emotional problems in later life. Take, for example, a study of 800 | :41:35. | :41:41. | |
children, which showed that if there was maltreatment between 0-3, | :41:41. | :41:46. | |
the outcomes were that much worse, if the maltreatment was between 3-6, | :41:46. | :41:52. | |
or 6-9. Have you read any of these studies, Dr Lee, going on about the | :41:52. | :41:55. | |
neuroscenes is completely irrelevant. Have you read the | :41:55. | :42:02. | |
studies? I have read many of them, plenty say one thing and one the | :42:02. | :42:05. | |
other. Name one study that doesn't, that contradicts the contention | :42:05. | :42:12. | |
that the early years are more important. Can I say something. | :42:12. | :42:17. | |
Name one study that contradicts Oliver James's assertion? There is | :42:17. | :42:24. | |
plenty of studies, if he reads Jerome Kegan, can I say something | :42:24. | :42:29. | |
or not, no, OK. My argument about this, and my perception of the | :42:30. | :42:33. | |
research is it is like lots of areas of research, where there is | :42:33. | :42:37. | |
plenty of different findings and we can have a perfectly reasonable | :42:37. | :42:42. | |
debate. The thing that has happened in this area, which is why I say it | :42:42. | :42:48. | |
has a moralistic dynamic, is certain people like Oliver James | :42:48. | :42:52. | |
have become increasingly shrill in the way they are posing things. | :42:52. | :42:56. | |
They want to turn research into a battering ram to convince parents | :42:56. | :43:00. | |
to do what they think they should do. The research demonstrates one | :43:00. | :43:04. | |
thing, surely it is his duty? doesn't demonstrate one thing. | :43:04. | :43:08. | |
Studies are studies, and we have a debate about what studies say, that | :43:08. | :43:13. | |
is a reasonable discussion to have. What isn't reasonable is to one- | :43:13. | :43:18. | |
sidedly turn this into a crusade and to override the idea that | :43:18. | :43:23. | |
parents have an entirely legitimate right and a legitimate interest in | :43:23. | :43:26. | |
deciding for themselves about various aspects of how they conduct | :43:26. | :43:30. | |
their family life. Like, for example, whether or not to put a | :43:30. | :43:33. | |
child into daycare. Oliver James is currently on a crusade against | :43:33. | :43:36. | |
mothers putting their children in daycare. He can say what he wants | :43:36. | :43:39. | |
about studies, some studies say one thing, some say the other, I think | :43:39. | :43:44. | |
in the normal run of family life, you should let parents decide what | :43:44. | :43:49. | |
they think is best for themselves, let them relax about all of this, | :43:49. | :43:53. | |
and do what makes sense in terms of work-life balance and conducting | :43:53. | :43:56. | |
ordinary every day family life and getting things to fit together. It | :43:56. | :44:00. | |
is just really got out of control and over the top. Would you be | :44:00. | :44:04. | |
willing to let parents relax? Absolutely I'm all in favour of | :44:04. | :44:09. | |
letting parents relax and let them do what they want to do, which | :44:09. | :44:14. | |
survey after survey shows is look after their children and love them. | :44:14. | :44:19. | |
Dr Lee has not read the survey, she hasn't read the studies. If you had | :44:19. | :44:22. | |
read them you would know they clearly show that the early years | :44:22. | :44:25. | |
are critical in setting the electrochemical thermostat for the | :44:25. | :44:30. | |
rest of your life. That is why it should be the basis of Government | :44:30. | :44:34. | |
policy. When Gordon Brown was trying to bail out the banks, he | :44:34. | :44:38. | |
kept on saying we will do whatever it takes to save the banks. If only | :44:38. | :44:42. | |
he had said we will do whatever it takes to enable parents to be able | :44:42. | :44:46. | |
to look after their children, to be at home and look after their | :44:46. | :44:51. | |
children? Can I finish. Parents are doing a fine job, we already have | :44:51. | :44:54. | |
an early intervention culture by what ordinary parents are doing | :44:54. | :44:59. | |
every day. The reason we do that is to allow all parents of under | :44:59. | :45:02. | |
three-year-olds to have the national average wage, each family | :45:02. | :45:06. | |
should have that. One or other parent, they could share that and | :45:06. | :45:10. | |
always be at home. Or if they don't want to look after their children | :45:10. | :45:15. | |
they can employ a nanny, this could be paid for by redistributing | :45:15. | :45:19. | |
wealth or 1% of the British land mass is owned by the Ministry of | :45:19. | :45:23. | |
Defence, why not sell some of that off. It is an interesting, unusual | :45:23. | :45:29. | |
idea, but you have no objection to that in principle, do you? I think | :45:29. | :45:34. | |
if...It Can't do any harm to have an intense focus on a child in its | :45:34. | :45:38. | |
early years? It depends, there is plenty of other studies and plenty | :45:38. | :45:43. | |
of research. Name one, name some studies, you keep saying, you | :45:43. | :45:47. | |
obviously haven't read the literature you can't name them? | :45:47. | :45:50. | |
talking about sociological studies which you haven't spent an awful | :45:50. | :45:59. | |
lot of time looking at. Looking at mothers' experience of parenting. | :45:59. | :46:02. | |
have read those studies, some of which were done at the University | :46:02. | :46:06. | |
of Kent. I sense we are not going to get a meeting of minds. We are | :46:06. | :46:09. | |
obviously not, it must be possible to have a reasonable discussion | :46:09. | :46:13. | |
about this, it must be possible to recognise that every day experience | :46:13. | :46:17. | |
of lots and lots of mothers and lots and lots of parents at the | :46:17. | :46:21. | |
moment is far too anxious and worried actually what we need, I | :46:21. | :46:26. | |
think, is a public discourse that recognises we don't have a | :46:26. | :46:29. | |
phenomenal parenting deficit in this country, most parents are | :46:29. | :46:34. | |
doing a great job, we should recognise that. Thank you both very | :46:34. | :46:37. | |
much. The European Union voted today to enhance Cliff Richard's | :46:37. | :46:43. | |
pension, they are extending the copyright on music performances | :46:43. | :46:47. | |
from 50-70 years, all sorts of codgers benefit from royalties on | :46:47. | :46:52. | |
things like this, here it is while we can still afford it. | :46:52. | :46:55. | |
# You came into my heart # So tend early | :46:55. | :47:02. | |
# With your burning love # That stings like a bee | :47:02. | :47:08. | |
# Oh now that I surrender # So helplessly | :47:08. | :47:13. | |
# Now you say you're gonna lead me # You're gonna leave me | :47:13. | :47:23. | |
:47:23. | :47:26. | ||
# Baby Hello there, the winds will ease | :47:26. | :47:31. | |
down only a little bit overnight tonight tomorrow will be another | :47:31. | :47:35. | |
windy day. Heavy showers drifting across, the strong winds across | :47:35. | :47:38. | |
southern areas, it stays wet in northern and western Scotland. | :47:38. | :47:42. | |
Inbetween there will be good spells of sunshine. Still a blustery day | :47:42. | :47:46. | |
across known England. A few heavy showers drifting across the | :47:46. | :47:48. | |
Midlands towards East Anglia and the south-east. Especially during | :47:48. | :47:52. | |
the early part of the afternoon. Most of the early showers in the | :47:52. | :47:58. | |
south west will be in the morning, the afternoon promises to chase the | :47:58. | :48:01. | |
showers away, the same goes for Wales. Wherever you are tomorrow it | :48:01. | :48:05. | |
will still be windy, still feeling cool, the wind blowing a few | :48:05. | :48:10. | |
showers into western parts of Wales. Much of Northern Ireland, rain | :48:10. | :48:14. | |
arriving late in the day. Still arriving here across much of | :48:14. | :48:17. | |
Scotland. The biggest issue across northern and western Scotland will | :48:17. | :48:20. | |
be the rain. It continues to build up through the day. There will | :48:20. | :48:24. | |
still be some during the course of Wednesday. There is the risk of | :48:24. | :48:27. | |
some tkphrooding problems across the far north and west of Scotland | :48:27. | :48:32. | |
as the rain continues to mount up. Elsewhere, further south, by | :48:32. | :48:36. | |
Wednesday hopefully the winds will be lighter, and we will start to | :48:36. | :48:40. |