Browse content similar to 14/12/2012. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Tonight, is it time we did something bold and admitted we need | :00:15. | :00:20. | |
a completely new approach to drugs? Whatever Government of any stripe | :00:20. | :00:23. | |
says, nearly three million of us are said to use them. If society | :00:23. | :00:27. | |
really is in war, it is one we are not winning, except, of course, it | :00:27. | :00:32. | |
is not society, but authority is not society, but authority | :00:32. | :00:38. | |
that's waging the war.Le They may be illegal, they may be bad for you. | :00:38. | :00:44. | |
But what about the very many people for whom drug taking is a | :00:44. | :00:48. | |
recreational and social habit. think pretty much every pub and bar | :00:48. | :00:53. | |
I have ever been into, if you look on the cistern of the toilet you | :00:53. | :00:58. | |
will find white crumbs of cocaine. Would decriminalising drugs change | :00:58. | :01:02. | |
behaviour more effectively than trying to pretend the state is on | :01:02. | :01:07. | |
top of the problem. Also tonight, yet another massacre of the | :01:07. | :01:12. | |
innocence in the United States. At least 27 people are killed in a | :01:12. | :01:18. | |
mass shooting at an Elementary School. Our hearts are broken today. | :01:18. | :01:23. | |
For the parents and grandparents, sisters and brothers of these | :01:23. | :01:26. | |
little children, and for the families of the adults who were | :01:26. | :01:30. | |
lost. And some of our most eminent scientists want an official pardon | :01:30. | :01:34. | |
for the great code breaker and mathematician, Alan Turing, who | :01:34. | :01:38. | |
killed himself after being convicted for gross indecency with | :01:38. | :01:42. | |
a man. But what is the point of pardoning a dead man for a crime | :01:42. | :01:52. | |
:01:52. | :01:54. | ||
which no longer exists. The war on drugs, the words are | :01:54. | :01:58. | |
surb such an empty cliche, even if the Vic -- such an empty cliche | :01:58. | :02:01. | |
even if the victims are real enough. Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime | :02:01. | :02:05. | |
Minister, says he wants a Royal Commission to re-think the way | :02:05. | :02:09. | |
drugs policy works. David Cameron has ruled it out. It is not purr | :02:09. | :02:12. | |
surprising that the two men disagree. It is -- surprising that | :02:12. | :02:17. | |
the two men disagree, it is as plain as the nose on your face, | :02:17. | :02:21. | |
that drugs abuse is widespread, and the illegality make as criminal | :02:21. | :02:24. | |
connection and drug habits drive crime. Might it be time for a new | :02:24. | :02:29. | |
approach? # Oh the weather outside is | :02:29. | :02:33. | |
frightful # But the fire is so delightful | :02:33. | :02:38. | |
# And since we've no place to go # Let it snow | :02:38. | :02:46. | |
The equivalent of the factory hooter has just gone off here in | :02:46. | :02:50. | |
the Square Mile, and people are taking to the clubs and pubs and | :02:50. | :02:53. | |
restaurants to toast their bonuses, if any. Will they be celebrating | :02:53. | :02:57. | |
only with the finest wines available to humanity, or might | :02:57. | :03:01. | |
there be other recreational substances available too. Many of | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
them in London take drugs, many of them take cocaine specifically, | :03:05. | :03:10. | |
because you get the buzz of the trading floor, you get, it's | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
glamorous, exclusive, expensive. It is the perfect drug for City boys, | :03:15. | :03:18. | |
many of my colleagues and clients used to indulge. It is really as | :03:18. | :03:22. | |
simple as that. No-one has a crystal ball on this, but the | :03:22. | :03:28. | |
deputy PM says we can't go on as we are. If you were on ducting Anwar | :03:28. | :03:34. | |
in which there were 2,000 fatalities d -- conducting a war in | :03:34. | :03:37. | |
which there were 2,000 fatalties, and your enemy is getting richer | :03:37. | :03:43. | |
all the time, and there are new weapons all the time, there are 40- | :03:43. | :03:47. | |
50 new legal highs everyy, and in which younger and younger children | :03:47. | :03:51. | |
are affected. If that was a war we would immediately say we have to do | :03:51. | :03:54. | |
something differently to wage the war more effectively. Hang on a | :03:54. | :03:59. | |
minute, the most recent figures actually show use of drugs is at | :03:59. | :04:04. | |
its lowest level since 96, use of Class A drugs has fluctuated over | :04:04. | :04:11. | |
this time, but has fallen since 2008. We have seen the gradual use | :04:11. | :04:16. | |
of drugs like cannabis, and to a degree, ecstacy, those have been | :04:16. | :04:20. | |
steadily going down. And I think there is pretty good evidence from | :04:21. | :04:26. | |
the crime survey for England and Wales of that. We have seen, I | :04:26. | :04:29. | |
think, with cocaine and with crack cocaine and with heroin, it has | :04:29. | :04:34. | |
gone down very slightly, it is probably best to say it has | :04:34. | :04:39. | |
plateaued. Cannabis, a class B substance, remains the drug taker's | :04:39. | :04:49. | |
:04:49. | :04:49. | ||
top choice. Followed by Class As cocaine and ecstacy. Next aream | :04:49. | :04:55. | |
mill nitrate, amphetamines and ketamine. Every pub and car I have | :04:55. | :05:00. | |
been into, if you look on the cistern of the toilet you will find | :05:00. | :05:04. | |
white crumbs of coke tain. That doesn't mean pubs populated by | :05:04. | :05:10. | |
plumbers and licenseatricians, or pubs populated by City boys and | :05:10. | :05:17. | |
stock brokers. It is everywhere, it really is. It was a war lost around | :05:17. | :05:22. | |
15 years ago, as far as I'm concerned. Nick Clegg is sending an | :05:22. | :05:28. | |
EMSry from London to investigate drug policies elsewhere. What might | :05:28. | :05:34. | |
his wise man discover. In Portugal they put people through | :05:34. | :05:38. | |
dissituation committees, where they might be put through treatment, and | :05:38. | :05:43. | |
given a smack on the wrist and sent to an education class. In Australia | :05:43. | :05:46. | |
they turn a blind eye and allow a concern amount of cannabis for | :05:46. | :05:56. | |
:05:56. | :05:57. | ||
possession. All of these countries, the important point is, things have | :05:57. | :06:03. | |
not got dramatically worse. That is great, but guess what the PM won't | :06:03. | :06:07. | |
be giving Mr Clegg for Christmas, a Royal Commission on drugs? | :06:07. | :06:10. | |
course the Deputy Prime Minister is entirely entitled to take a view | :06:10. | :06:14. | |
for the next election and beyond for his manifesto, wanting to go | :06:14. | :06:19. | |
further, wanting to have a Royal Commission. I personally don't | :06:19. | :06:22. | |
support a Royal Commission. There is always a danger that they can | :06:22. | :06:26. | |
take minutes and it can last for years. I'm very happy to debate and | :06:26. | :06:28. | |
discuss drug policy, I think the coalition Government has taken a | :06:29. | :06:31. | |
series of good steps. # Let it snow | :06:31. | :06:41. | |
:06:41. | :06:46. | ||
Julia Manning is health campaigner and chief executive of the at this | :06:46. | :06:51. | |
tang 2020 Health. We have a clinical psychologist specialising | :06:51. | :07:01. | |
:07:01. | :07:02. | ||
in drug use. And Elliott is a drug user, what do you use now? | :07:02. | :07:06. | |
injecting morphine. How do you pay for it, we pay for it, the | :07:06. | :07:12. | |
taxpayer? Yes. You can function? function very well, I was a daily | :07:12. | :07:15. | |
heroin user doing my PhD and teaching at university. Are you | :07:15. | :07:23. | |
working now? I'm executive direct of the group about people taking | :07:23. | :07:28. | |
drugs, I have come are back from a UN conference where I was arguing | :07:28. | :07:32. | |
for drug taking. Are there lots of people like you, regular drug | :07:32. | :07:36. | |
users? Countless thousands of people whose drug use is functional, | :07:36. | :07:40. | |
and because of the stigma and discrimination and criminalisation, | :07:40. | :07:43. | |
cannot possibly come out in public and admit to the fact that they use | :07:43. | :07:47. | |
drugs that are currently legal, but do so in a perfectly functional way. | :07:47. | :07:51. | |
What do you make of that position? I think it's unsustainable. It was | :07:51. | :07:54. | |
interesting in the video that we heard Nick Clegg talking about why | :07:54. | :07:58. | |
he's talking about this today, that the drugs policy isn't working. Yet | :07:59. | :08:04. | |
we then saw statistics to show he's ten years out of date. Our laws are | :08:04. | :08:08. | |
working, he particularly focused on children, and their drug use, their | :08:08. | :08:12. | |
use has gone down by 30% in the past ten years. This raises the | :08:12. | :08:16. | |
question, which we all need to engage with, what is the aim of | :08:16. | :08:21. | |
drugs policy? Drugs policy really ought to be towards the public good. | :08:22. | :08:26. | |
It should be to do with reducing the collective harm we have in | :08:26. | :08:30. | |
society. But, you have just heard somebody say, we will leave aside | :08:30. | :08:33. | |
our feelings about whether we should be paying for your drugs, | :08:33. | :08:37. | |
but there is somebody who can function perfectly well, where is | :08:37. | :08:42. | |
the gain in stopping him using? Part of the problem that we have, | :08:42. | :08:45. | |
which makes it a difficult topic for the general public and | :08:45. | :08:51. | |
politicians, is that use of drugs is associated with harm, for many | :08:51. | :08:56. | |
individuals, it is a harm that we would want to avoid. But, also, our | :08:56. | :09:01. | |
sanctions, also bringing their own collateral damage and complicate it. | :09:01. | :09:06. | |
One is looking, really for whatever incremental change can you make, | :09:06. | :09:10. | |
that reduces the harm overall. you share that view of what the | :09:10. | :09:13. | |
objective of drugs policy ought to be? Every law is about balancing | :09:13. | :09:19. | |
freedom and risk. And to date we have felt that the risk of drug | :09:19. | :09:24. | |
taking, outweighs our freedoms to be able to do what we want and take | :09:24. | :09:28. | |
whatever drugs we want. It is not just about the science, it is about | :09:28. | :09:32. | |
society, it is about what's in the national interest, and that is | :09:32. | :09:37. | |
outweighed, you know, the risks are too great. I would actually dispute | :09:37. | :09:41. | |
that you are still functioning normally. I'm afraid the medical | :09:41. | :09:44. | |
evidence is your blood vessels are shrinking by the month, by the year. | :09:44. | :09:48. | |
You will not be able to sustain having morphine injections until | :09:48. | :09:52. | |
you are old, you won't get to old age. | :09:52. | :09:58. | |
How old are you? I'm 43 years old, I have been using heroin for 25 | :09:58. | :10:03. | |
years, and as you probably know, if you do know the evidence, opiates | :10:03. | :10:07. | |
are actually a very safe substance to use. You The only risk | :10:07. | :10:11. | |
associated with overdose. You feel well? I'm extremely well, as I said, | :10:11. | :10:16. | |
I was doing my PhD, whilst a daily heroin user. Lots of people sleep | :10:16. | :10:21. | |
their ways through PhDs? Indeed they do. However, when I was | :10:21. | :10:27. | |
teaching and working, nobody ever knew I was a daily heroin user, it | :10:27. | :10:30. | |
didn't affect my ability to function at a high level. If the | :10:30. | :10:34. | |
idea is to minimise harm, that's the objective, minimising harm, and | :10:34. | :10:40. | |
there are various ways that might be done. Is harm being minimised, | :10:40. | :10:45. | |
currently, by keeping them illegal? In a way the missing ingredient | :10:45. | :10:51. | |
from the way we tackle this problem is that we don't test that. What we | :10:51. | :10:55. | |
have is political and public posturing, we have people coming on | :10:55. | :10:59. | |
your programme and others, campaigning, or lobbying. What you | :10:59. | :11:03. | |
really want to do is make small incremental changes, as you would | :11:03. | :11:07. | |
do in the treatment, if you want to know whether you get improved | :11:07. | :11:12. | |
treatment with cancer survival rates, or any other disorder like | :11:12. | :11:16. | |
that, you expect toe see small incremental change, and you want to | :11:16. | :11:20. | |
check does that improve the situation or worsen it. What is | :11:20. | :11:23. | |
missing is the commitment to science. What you are saying is the | :11:23. | :11:26. | |
very worst people to make drugs policy are politicians? I think | :11:26. | :11:32. | |
there is an inherent problem in the position of positions. They | :11:32. | :11:35. | |
necessarily want to do what is popular, and what I want | :11:35. | :11:39. | |
politicians to do, is to look at the evidence and do what is most | :11:39. | :11:41. | |
effective. What would you change about the way | :11:41. | :11:46. | |
drugs policy works now? I would want to look at the way we deal | :11:46. | :11:51. | |
with called legal highs. I think, the law cannot keep up, they are | :11:51. | :11:54. | |
coming on the market, the film said one new one every year, I think it | :11:54. | :11:59. | |
is more frequent than that. And we can't possibly keep up. We need to | :11:59. | :12:03. | |
look at them in the same way we do with prescription drugs. If they | :12:03. | :12:06. | |
have a license then they are legal, if they haven't got a license and | :12:06. | :12:09. | |
they are not prescribeed, then they are illegal, it doesn't matter what | :12:09. | :12:12. | |
they are called or the new formulation is. That is one thing. | :12:12. | :12:15. | |
The other thing I would like to see is a serious look at the drug | :12:15. | :12:18. | |
problem in prison, that is out of control. That bit isn't working, | :12:18. | :12:22. | |
and I take your point, we should be looking at what we can change there | :12:22. | :12:27. | |
to improve outcomes for prisoners. That we have a lunatic penal system | :12:27. | :12:30. | |
in which people go in clean and come out addicted. That is to do | :12:30. | :12:35. | |
with the way the prisons are run as much as anything. Is there some | :12:35. | :12:39. | |
deep social problem in this country that leads to greater drug use? Why | :12:39. | :12:45. | |
did you start doing it? It was purely a choice that I chose to | :12:45. | :12:49. | |
make. Out of intellectual curiosity and interest, something I found to | :12:49. | :12:54. | |
be enjoyable, and sociable. But you know that there are plenty of other | :12:54. | :12:57. | |
people who have taken heroin, crack cocaine, and various other drugs, | :12:57. | :13:01. | |
and are not here to tell the tale, you are very blase about it? | :13:01. | :13:08. | |
this is not about me as a person, as an individual. The fact is, we | :13:08. | :13:11. | |
have an enormous number of people who use drugs, who have a large | :13:11. | :13:16. | |
range of social problems, whether they be lack of housing, lack of | :13:16. | :13:22. | |
employment, lack of education, and in addition to drug use. What tends | :13:23. | :13:26. | |
to happen is we identify drug use as the sole cause of the problems | :13:26. | :13:30. | |
they have. We are dealing with a very complex social mix. | :13:30. | :13:34. | |
Criminalising people and subjected them to stigma is increasing the | :13:34. | :13:37. | |
problems. It is very difficult when there is such a broad span of | :13:37. | :13:41. | |
people who use drugs. The sort of evidence that Steve Smith was | :13:41. | :13:45. | |
citing in that piece, people go clubbing, for example, or they go | :13:45. | :13:48. | |
out on social events, it is a different kind of problem to the | :13:49. | :13:54. | |
sort of problem that you have identified here, of people who are | :13:54. | :13:58. | |
socially disadvantaged, and are using drugs for whatever reason as | :13:59. | :14:01. | |
part of that whole experience of social disadvantage. It is very | :14:01. | :14:05. | |
hard to have some overarching policy isn't it? Well, I think we | :14:05. | :14:12. | |
have got one, which is using drugs is illegal, that is an overarching | :14:12. | :14:16. | |
policy. It is an interesting point. You already said, it's indicative | :14:16. | :14:19. | |
of social dysfunction, of lack of confidence, of needing that | :14:19. | :14:23. | |
something else that you can't get from yourself, and drugs then, | :14:23. | :14:27. | |
turning to drugs simply causes addiction, causing problems with | :14:27. | :14:30. | |
finance, with crime. We should be looking at why are people turning | :14:30. | :14:34. | |
to drugs in the first place. What is wrong that they feel that is the | :14:34. | :14:39. | |
only solution for them? David Cameron came up with the old line | :14:39. | :14:43. | |
about Royal Commissions taking minutes and lasting years. The | :14:43. | :14:46. | |
other one is they are not so much designed to dig things up, and dig | :14:46. | :14:51. | |
them in. Would you have a Royal Commission? I'm probably not the | :14:51. | :14:54. | |
sort of person who would say a Royal Commission is the right | :14:54. | :14:59. | |
mechanism or not. A way of re- examining? What we do want is an | :14:59. | :15:02. | |
open-minded examination of the different options. I mean I would | :15:02. | :15:07. | |
differ in the view about, I would not want to be encouraging people | :15:07. | :15:12. | |
to use drugs. I would want to have mechanisms that enabled people to | :15:12. | :15:18. | |
get out of the hole that they are in. Some of those would involve | :15:18. | :15:25. | |
meeting people where they are. Working with their difficulties. I | :15:25. | :15:30. | |
think the prison example is a good one. I would go back to the science | :15:30. | :15:35. | |
question. I would expect people to tell me where the short sentences, | :15:35. | :15:39. | |
or long sentences were more effective. Or how much difference | :15:39. | :15:44. | |
did the support after prison make? Those answers would then guide me | :15:44. | :15:47. | |
in how I constructed a more effective response. What we can | :15:47. | :15:51. | |
learn from Portugal, is that policy was brought in specifically for | :15:51. | :15:55. | |
people who are HIV-positive, and the amount of transference of HIV | :15:55. | :16:01. | |
through drug users, using syringes, it wasn't about going soft on drugs. | :16:01. | :16:06. | |
Of course, what there is in the Portugal example, while the focus | :16:06. | :16:11. | |
has been on the legal framework, it actually is a shift in the | :16:11. | :16:16. | |
investment from a criminal justice response to actually a health | :16:16. | :16:19. | |
caring response. Another bunch of children murdered in a place of | :16:19. | :16:23. | |
apparent safety, what is there to say, except, not again. The news | :16:23. | :16:27. | |
that at least 26 people, most of them children, have died in yet | :16:27. | :16:33. | |
another mass shooting, this time at an Elementary School in Conneticut, | :16:33. | :16:38. | |
has a sickening familiarity. The affection which much of the US | :16:38. | :16:41. | |
looks on guns will be re-examined again, and we shall soon hear again | :16:41. | :16:45. | |
the claims of the gun trade that they cannot be blamed for what | :16:45. | :16:49. | |
people do with their lethal products. Tonight the President had | :16:49. | :16:53. | |
this emotional reaction. majority of those who died today | :16:53. | :16:58. | |
were children. Beautiful little kids between the ages of five and | :16:58. | :17:08. | |
:17:08. | :17:14. | ||
ten years old. They had their entire lives ahead of them. | :17:14. | :17:24. | |
:17:24. | :17:26. | ||
Birthdays, graduations, weddings, kids of their own. Among the fallen | :17:26. | :17:31. | |
were also teachers, men and women who devoted their lives to helping | :17:32. | :17:39. | |
our children fulfil their dreams. So our hearts are broken today. | :17:39. | :17:42. | |
have Bill Clinton's speechwriter at the time of the Columbine massacre, | :17:42. | :17:52. | |
:17:52. | :17:52. | ||
and now edits Washington Monthly, and we have the bureau chief from | :17:52. | :17:57. | |
one of the papers. The White House was saying it is not the time for | :17:57. | :18:02. | |
policy initiatives, why not, if not when? It is a perfect time to talk | :18:02. | :18:04. | |
policy. In the Clinton administration, when we had these | :18:04. | :18:07. | |
sorts of mass shooting, you bet we used them to draw attention to | :18:07. | :18:14. | |
policies that we had, that we thought would lessen gun crimes. | :18:15. | :18:18. | |
Since then, however, the politics of the country have changed, the | :18:18. | :18:21. | |
politics of the democratic party have changed. And the President, | :18:21. | :18:26. | |
and lots of Democrats over the last eight years, ten years, have made | :18:26. | :18:34. | |
the decision that trying to do something about gun crimes, about | :18:34. | :18:40. | |
gun control, is a political loser. So very little has been proposed. | :18:40. | :18:45. | |
Really, since the late 19 90s. this likely to have any greater | :18:45. | :18:50. | |
impact in terms of gun control than previous tragedies in your country? | :18:50. | :18:54. | |
Well, I am afraid that I'm sceptical. We have seen a series of | :18:54. | :18:59. | |
shootings over the years, and in many places people have said this | :18:59. | :19:03. | |
is the one, this one is so ghastly, there is something so uniquely | :19:03. | :19:07. | |
horrible. We had the one in the movie theatre this summer? Colorado, | :19:07. | :19:11. | |
where the man was wearing a terrifying costume, it was in the | :19:11. | :19:17. | |
middle of this Batman premier, people were trapped in their seats. | :19:17. | :19:22. | |
There was something unusually sadistic about it. Opinion about | :19:22. | :19:30. | |
gun control didn't change, when Gaby Gifford, a popular | :19:30. | :19:33. | |
Congresswoman was shot that didn't change things. The victims are so | :19:33. | :19:38. | |
young this time, and the numbers are so high, will it be | :19:38. | :19:41. | |
qualitatively different, recent history makes me sceptical it would | :19:41. | :19:46. | |
be. It is a matter of utter bafflement to the rest of the world, | :19:46. | :19:49. | |
when you see these things happening time after time after time, and | :19:49. | :19:58. | |
there is no change of policy? What is your idea? I think, if it turns | :19:58. | :20:05. | |
out that this gun that was used in the shooting, was gotten illegally. | :20:05. | :20:09. | |
There is a chance that we will see some policy initiative. What really | :20:09. | :20:12. | |
needs to happen in the United States, is to crack down on the | :20:12. | :20:17. | |
handful of gun dealers, whose weapons wind up being used by | :20:17. | :20:21. | |
criminals in crimes. The vast majority of gun crimes are from | :20:21. | :20:27. | |
guns that come from a tiny fraction of gun store, the problem is the | :20:27. | :20:30. | |
federal Government's agency to regulate gun stores, the ATF, is | :20:30. | :20:35. | |
ham strung by laws put there by Republican Congressmen, and | :20:35. | :20:39. | |
senators, and in cahoots with the National Rifle Association, that is | :20:39. | :20:44. | |
a good battle to have. If it is a legal gun, bought by somebody who, | :20:44. | :20:49. | |
for whom, our existing gun laws, even if enforced, would not have | :20:49. | :20:53. | |
stopped. Then it is a much harder to see what the next policy step | :20:53. | :21:00. | |
would be. What do you think, why does this keep on happening in your | :21:00. | :21:06. | |
country? We have got 300 million guns floating around the country. | :21:06. | :21:10. | |
It has always been a country that revered the capacity of citizens, | :21:11. | :21:16. | |
the ability of citizens, to own guns. But not to shoot children in | :21:16. | :21:24. | |
school, what's your view? Of course. Well, of course, that, a big issue | :21:24. | :21:31. | |
we can't overlook is mental health. If one common thread to all the | :21:31. | :21:35. | |
incidents, is severely disturbed people who didn't get the mental | :21:35. | :21:39. | |
health assistance they needed. I want to remind people that the | :21:39. | :21:43. | |
story is more about gun laws, there is only so much you can legislate | :21:43. | :21:46. | |
to prevent someone hurting people if there is something seriously | :21:46. | :21:50. | |
wrong with them. There are often red flags overlooked, people need | :21:50. | :21:54. | |
treatment and perhaps they need to be locked up. There is this element | :21:54. | :21:59. | |
to the national culture, for better or for worse, it is written in the | :21:59. | :22:02. | |
constitution that there is a might to bear arms. People argue about | :22:02. | :22:06. | |
what it means. But it has become part of America's character, that | :22:06. | :22:13. | |
goes back to that frontier, ethos. It was really striking, wasn't it, | :22:13. | :22:17. | |
that Obama looked visibly, very moved by what had happened, do you | :22:17. | :22:23. | |
think he will be moved enough to act on these in-built convictions | :22:23. | :22:26. | |
that allow these people to act like this? I don't want to be glib, but | :22:26. | :22:31. | |
you might speculate that he was moved because he knows that so | :22:31. | :22:34. | |
little realistically can be done and will be done. I think the | :22:35. | :22:40. | |
political system, look there is a well-funded, well-organised, very | :22:40. | :22:44. | |
effective lobby that fight gun control laws in this country. On | :22:44. | :22:49. | |
the otherhand you have a public that is horrified and outraged | :22:49. | :22:55. | |
periodically by events like this, but the emotions fade. The National | :22:55. | :22:59. | |
Rifle Association, and those gun lobbies who wake up thinking about | :22:59. | :23:03. | |
this, they don't give up the fight and they have the upper hand. | :23:03. | :23:08. | |
of the most distinguished scientists in the land want the | :23:08. | :23:16. | |
Prime Minister formally to forgive, the mathematician that played a an | :23:16. | :23:20. | |
important role in breaking codes in Bletchley Park. Alan Turing killed | :23:20. | :23:24. | |
himself after being accused of gross indecency with a man. No-one | :23:24. | :23:28. | |
denies he served his country or his suicide was a tragedy, what exactly | :23:28. | :23:32. | |
is the Prime Minister to forgive? Indeed, is he in any permission to | :23:32. | :23:38. | |
do so. Why not apologise to other victims of other now long dead laws. | :23:38. | :23:43. | |
He was a brilliant mathematician and computer pioneer, it was Alan | :23:43. | :23:50. | |
Turing's work, decoding military messages sent out by the German | :23:50. | :23:54. | |
Enigma machine, that made him a hero. During the Second World War | :23:55. | :23:59. | |
the Germans believed the Enigma code of unbreakable, in one of the | :23:59. | :24:04. | |
most secret projects of the war, Bletchley Park, Turing's team | :24:05. | :24:08. | |
cracked it. The gave the Allies the intelligence to anticipate what the | :24:08. | :24:13. | |
Germans might do next, shortening the war and saving lives. But in | :24:13. | :24:18. | |
1952, Alan Turing was charged with gross indecency, for committing | :24:18. | :24:23. | |
homosexual acts. He avoided prison, only by agreeing to injections of | :24:23. | :24:28. | |
female hormones. Two years later he was found dead, having eaten an | :24:28. | :24:35. | |
apple laced with cyanide. In 2009, after an on-line petition calling | :24:35. | :24:41. | |
for him to be pardoned received tenss of thousands of signatures, | :24:41. | :24:45. | |
Gordon Brown apologised for the way he was treated. Scientists, | :24:45. | :24:49. | |
including Stephen Hawking, the head of the Royal Society, and the | :24:49. | :24:52. | |
Astronomer Royal, have called for David Cameron, formally, to forgive | :24:52. | :24:57. | |
him. If he's pardoned, who else? Oscar Wilde, he's famous too, do | :24:57. | :25:00. | |
great actions make you more deserving than the thousands of | :25:00. | :25:04. | |
others convicted under the same law? | :25:04. | :25:10. | |
Posthumous pardons do happen. In 2006, the MoD gave one to more than | :25:10. | :25:15. | |
300 soldiers, shot for military eavess, including cowardice - | :25:15. | :25:19. | |
offences, including cowardice in World War I. A pardon doesn't undo | :25:19. | :25:24. | |
the damage, but campaigners say it would undo the blemish. | :25:24. | :25:28. | |
Bletchley Park is in the constituency of Ian Stewart, and he | :25:28. | :25:36. | |
is supporting the campaign for Alan Turing to be pardoned, we have the | :25:36. | :25:39. | |
Professor of mathematics at the university of Oxford. What | :25:39. | :25:44. | |
difference would a pardon make? this centinary year, the pardon | :25:45. | :25:51. | |
will help us not only celebrate his many achievements, but right a | :25:51. | :25:54. | |
dreadful wrong done to this brilliant man. He's dead? You said | :25:54. | :26:01. | |
in the introduction, there is a precedent now, the desers in World | :26:01. | :26:05. | |
War I was pardoned, Government has passed already an act in the | :26:05. | :26:10. | |
protection of freedoms act, which cleanses a record of living people, | :26:10. | :26:14. | |
who were convicted of such called crimes. I just think now we have to | :26:14. | :26:20. | |
right the wrong. What do you think about it? Alan Turing is one of my | :26:20. | :26:24. | |
great heros, one of the greatest scientist of the 20th century. In | :26:24. | :26:29. | |
some ways the issue is slightly confused. You know, why pardon him, | :26:29. | :26:35. | |
because he's a great mathematician, and a hero for the Second World War, | :26:35. | :26:39. | |
helped crack the Enigma reason. I think it doesn't go far enough, I | :26:39. | :26:43. | |
think, certainly, he should be pardoned, but also everyone | :26:43. | :26:47. | |
convicted under the act. The wrong was making that a criminal act. | :26:47. | :26:51. | |
fame, his celebrity, his talent, whatever, should not entitle him to | :26:51. | :26:55. | |
preferential treatment, should it? The Government has already acted to | :26:55. | :27:01. | |
cleanse the record of living people, it doesn't apply posthumously. | :27:01. | :27:06. | |
There mayle well be other very deserving cases. -- There may well | :27:06. | :27:10. | |
be other deserving cases. What about Oscar Wilde, he was convicted | :27:10. | :27:14. | |
of the same offence? That is a separate debate to be had. It is | :27:14. | :27:19. | |
the same issue, you would say yes? This is just confusing it, it is | :27:19. | :27:22. | |
really about criminalising. What about people convicted of | :27:22. | :27:27. | |
witchcraft, that is another law that no longer exists? For Alan | :27:27. | :27:32. | |
Turing, we owe our liberty to this man, he cracked the code, and | :27:32. | :27:35. | |
without his work the war would have been prolonged and the outcome | :27:36. | :27:39. | |
might have been given. The apology given by Gordon Brown was | :27:39. | :27:42. | |
absolutely right, think we can do better for, that there is a public | :27:42. | :27:46. | |
appetite for it. At the time this was a crime what he did. That is a | :27:46. | :27:51. | |
fair point. That's why Governments of both colours have resisted a | :27:51. | :27:56. | |
pardon until now. I think there is a debate to be had. I would like to | :27:56. | :28:00. | |
see parliament have a chance fully to debate this and express its | :28:00. | :28:02. | |
opinion. Where would you take it, you say this is a pardon that | :28:03. | :28:06. | |
should be extended to everyone convicted of this crime, would you | :28:06. | :28:10. | |
extend it to other things that are no longer a crime? I mentioned | :28:10. | :28:14. | |
witchcraft, there are people who died because they were judged | :28:14. | :28:18. | |
witches? This is a case of taking each particular criminal act and | :28:18. | :28:21. | |
deciding it should never have been a criminal act. In this case it is | :28:21. | :28:26. | |
totally clear it was a big mistake to criminalise homosexuality. | :28:26. | :28:31. | |
Witchcraft? I would go for that. Any others? So there would be a | :28:31. | :28:34. | |
blanket pardon, despite the fact that in the context of the time it | :28:34. | :28:38. | |
was a crime? The pardon is saying it was a mistake to make that a | :28:38. | :28:43. | |
crime. And we now realise it was a mistake, it should never have been | :28:43. | :28:48. | |
that. It is great retrospective wisdom? It is strange the letter, | :28:48. | :28:52. | |
which is asking Cameron to pardon Alan Turing, he did nothing wrong. | :28:52. | :28:57. | |
He doesn't need forgiving. The word "forgiveness". Who is David Cameron | :28:57. | :29:01. | |
it pardon anybody? They should be asking Turing to forgive them, | :29:01. | :29:05. | |
frankly, I think it is all the wrong way round. If I can just | :29:05. | :29:09. | |
point out, there is a bill in parliament at the moment, sponsored | :29:09. | :29:14. | |
by my colleague in the Lords, Lord Sharky, the bill is very | :29:14. | :29:18. | |
specifically on Alan Turing, it would be parliament that passed a | :29:18. | :29:22. | |
law. It wouldn't be the Prime Minister himself granting a pardon. | :29:22. | :29:29. | |
I think that is a very important We have to check out now to make | :29:29. | :29:36. | |
way for the review show, and their exciting Hobbit-fest coming up. | :29:36. | :29:42. | |
Next time you watch a dimwited Hobbit wrestling with the bleeping | :29:42. | :29:47. | |
supermarket checkouts in your local supermarket. Say out a prayer for | :29:47. | :29:52. |