
Browse content similar to 16/11/2012. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
| Line | From | To | |
|---|---|---|---|
It is now time for Newswatch. This week, your reactions to the crisis | :00:03. | :00:13. | |
| :00:13. | :00:14. | ||
Well come to Newswatch with me, Samira Ahmed. The biggest crisis | :00:14. | :00:18. | |
facing BBC News in a decade, how did it happen? Can the | :00:18. | :00:23. | |
corporation's journalism still be trusted? Does George Entwistle | :00:23. | :00:33. | |
| :00:33. | :00:34. | ||
deserve his pay-off? And has it all The BBC marked 90 years of | :00:34. | :00:37. | |
broadcasting this week, but there was not much of a celebratory air | :00:37. | :00:41. | |
around. The crisis started by a Newsnight report on care homes in | :00:41. | :00:46. | |
Wales which led to Lord McAlpine being wrongly implicated in child | :00:46. | :00:50. | |
abuse allegations came to a head on Saturday night. A new crisis for | :00:50. | :00:55. | |
Newsnight. Tonight this programme apologises. A key allegation in a | :00:55. | :01:00. | |
report about child abuse was wrong. The victims says he was mistaken. | :01:00. | :01:05. | |
The wholly exceptional advance of the past few weeks have led me to | :01:05. | :01:10. | |
conclude that the BBC should appoint a new leader. I have a job | :01:10. | :01:14. | |
to do, get a grip of the situation. The BBC deserves strong leadership, | :01:14. | :01:19. | |
that is what I want to bring. course they should have called me, | :01:19. | :01:24. | |
and I would have told them exactly what they learned later on. What | :01:24. | :01:27. | |
was that? That it was complete rubbish. | :01:27. | :01:32. | |
As a result of George Entwistle's resignation, the acting director- | :01:32. | :01:38. | |
general of his Tim Davie, and because of others stepping aside | :01:38. | :01:43. | |
pending inquiries, BBC news now also has an acting director, and | :01:43. | :01:48. | |
acting deputy director, and acting head of news-gathering, and acting | :01:48. | :01:53. | |
editors of Newsnight and of the Today programme. Clearly, or | :01:53. | :01:57. | |
reorganisation to be done there, but where should the BBC go from | :01:57. | :02:07. | |
| :02:07. | :02:27. | ||
here? Newswatch dealers have not We asked for an interview with a | :02:27. | :02:30. | |
BBC News executive but were told no-one was available. We can | :02:30. | :02:34. | |
discuss what viewers think about the events of the past week, and we | :02:35. | :02:38. | |
are joined by Terry Berry, who spoke to us about the Jimmy Savile | :02:38. | :02:43. | |
scandal, and Alex Giles. In Birmingham is Georgio Mystkowski, | :02:43. | :02:48. | |
and joining us from Salford is June Bennett. Terry Berry, what has been | :02:48. | :02:52. | |
your concern watching events unfold? I think it has been the | :02:52. | :02:59. | |
lack of clarity from management, the higher management, would regard | :02:59. | :03:04. | |
to... It seems to me that people are standing aside, while | :03:04. | :03:08. | |
investigations are going on. However, it was quite disturbing to | :03:08. | :03:13. | |
see George Entwistle given his notice after such a short time. | :03:13. | :03:17. | |
do not see a connection between who seems to have gone and be | :03:17. | :03:22. | |
responsible. Exactly, but from George Entwistle's point of view, | :03:22. | :03:27. | |
nobody gave him a head start that was so something so serious about | :03:27. | :03:31. | |
the programme that was going up. Somebody could have made the phone | :03:31. | :03:35. | |
call to say, look, this is what is coming your way. Although he admits | :03:35. | :03:39. | |
he did not look at this or that programme or read the newspapers, | :03:39. | :03:42. | |
surely somebody could have said, there is something going on here, | :03:42. | :03:48. | |
it needs to come across your desk. Where were the management? You have | :03:48. | :03:52. | |
a different concern, June, what was your view about the way the story | :03:52. | :03:59. | |
was covered? I think there was far too much attention being paid to | :03:59. | :04:07. | |
the difficulties at the BBC, who had mentioned somebody's name, and | :04:07. | :04:12. | |
the children were not considered. I mean, I was amazed that it was | :04:12. | :04:18. | |
aired on one programme, saying that Steve Messham was not a reliable | :04:18. | :04:25. | |
witness. I could not believe that anybody could pile that on top of | :04:25. | :04:30. | |
what he has lived through through all his life. So is there a bigger | :04:30. | :04:34. | |
concern that because of the attention being paid to BBC | :04:34. | :04:37. | |
managers resigning that the focus shifted off children who have been | :04:37. | :04:45. | |
abused? Yes, without a doubt. We have heard names, and we did see on | :04:45. | :04:49. | |
television people who had come forward, and they have come forward, | :04:50. | :04:54. | |
and you can see the anguish with which they felt, and these children | :04:54. | :04:59. | |
have spent all their lives feeling unclean, used, having nowhere to go, | :04:59. | :05:04. | |
and all of a sudden they could see a window, a window where perhaps | :05:04. | :05:08. | |
they could perhaps express how they felt throughout their lives up to | :05:08. | :05:12. | |
that point. They had been physically abused, but also | :05:12. | :05:16. | |
mentally abused, and to me they were the people who we should be | :05:16. | :05:25. | |
focusing on. The whole issue that we heard earlier, it did lead the | :05:25. | :05:28. | |
director-general to resign. You think that was the right thing to | :05:28. | :05:33. | |
do? Is the BBC moving on? Yes, I do. I would agree with everything the | :05:34. | :05:39. | |
previous speakers have said. My concern was particularly upon the | :05:39. | :05:45. | |
BBC and the trustees' understanding of the word honourable. On Saturday | :05:45. | :05:49. | |
night, the former director-general came on television with the | :05:49. | :05:53. | |
chairman, Mr Patten, stood behind him, and he made a statement that | :05:53. | :05:57. | |
he was resigning as editor in chief because it was the honourable thing. | :05:57. | :06:01. | |
I think the majority of people around the country would say, is it | :06:01. | :06:05. | |
really honourable for somebody to take one year's salary after 54 | :06:05. | :06:11. | |
days when he should have been sacked? I just want the BBC to use | :06:11. | :06:17. | |
those words, like honour, integrity, all those key words, I want them to | :06:17. | :06:22. | |
use them so carefully, so that the viewers and the public start | :06:22. | :06:25. | |
believing again and start getting their commitment back to what the | :06:25. | :06:31. | |
BBC. Thank you. Alex, one of the practical effect of all this | :06:31. | :06:33. | |
decision-making, honourable or otherwise, is that Newsnight is not | :06:33. | :06:37. | |
allowed to make any investigative reports at the moment. What is your | :06:38. | :06:44. | |
feeling about that? I think they have been making a real meal of it, | :06:44. | :06:47. | |
frankly, and I think George Entwistle has got an expectation | :06:47. | :06:50. | |
and a right to expect his editors and his managers to be doing their | :06:50. | :06:54. | |
job. I notice that David Dimbleby said the director-general should | :06:54. | :06:59. | |
fight like a tiger for this organisation. There has not been | :06:59. | :07:05. | |
enough fighting? These are two programmes, ironically, one which | :07:05. | :07:09. | |
was maybe too wary, they sat on the story, they were too concerned | :07:09. | :07:13. | |
about who they were going to upset, and the other story more recently, | :07:13. | :07:17. | |
they jumped the gun, before they properly check the stories. Stuff | :07:17. | :07:21. | |
like that happens in journalism, surely, all the time, and what we | :07:21. | :07:25. | |
are seeing now is it being blown out of all proportion. I am not for | :07:25. | :07:30. | |
one moment saying that this identifying someone as a child | :07:30. | :07:33. | |
abuser or not listening to these children is not a serious matter, | :07:33. | :07:37. | |
but I do think there is a huge amount of news that is going out | :07:37. | :07:44. | |
from the BBC which is fantastic, and so much time is being wasted, | :07:44. | :07:48. | |
you know, with his inviting being played out in front of the viewers. | :07:48. | :07:53. | |
June, in a sentence, what would you like to see the BBC do now to win | :07:54. | :07:57. | |
back on confidence and trust? have not lost my confidence or my | :07:57. | :08:02. | |
trust. What I would like them to do is to try and work with agencies to | :08:02. | :08:06. | |
try and help these children, to try and help them move forward in their | :08:06. | :08:11. | |
lives, and to feel as if we are not letting them down. OK. The final | :08:11. | :08:16. | |
thing I would say is we all need to say to ourselves, if this was my | :08:16. | :08:21. | |
child, how would I feel? The same question to you, in a sentence. | :08:21. | :08:26. | |
What has been said is absolutely right that when it comes to abuse | :08:26. | :08:30. | |
of children, all too often the reporting is very salacious, it is | :08:30. | :08:37. | |
very focused on the abuser and the acts. It rarely focuses on the | :08:37. | :08:43. | |
carriage and the bravery of the young person in these instances, | :08:43. | :08:46. | |
but if we think about the young people who have the courage to | :08:46. | :08:49. | |
speak up, let's give them airtime which would encourage other young | :08:49. | :08:56. | |
people to speak up as well. Terry, again, briefly. I agree with what | :08:56. | :09:02. | |
has been said, but what troubles me is the clarity and getting to the | :09:02. | :09:06. | |
checks and balances that are in place, the structure, the | :09:06. | :09:10. | |
management processes, which allowed this to happen. It seems as though | :09:10. | :09:15. | |
people have stood aside, to use that word again, without coming | :09:15. | :09:18. | |
forward, and now it looks like the people are consulting lawyers about | :09:18. | :09:23. | |
statements, what they are going to say. They are afraid to come out | :09:23. | :09:26. | |
with a possible truth, what has happened, and that is where they | :09:26. | :09:29. | |
are something dark and sinister going on. So you need clarity on | :09:29. | :09:34. | |
the way that management is handling things. I would like to see them | :09:34. | :09:41. | |
get along with serving the public. It is such a great organisation | :09:41. | :09:45. | |
that we are all very proud of. will have to leave it there, but | :09:45. | :09:55. | |
| :09:55. | :09:56. | ||
all of you, thank you very much for While the reverberations of all | :09:56. | :09:59. | |
that will carry on for some time, you have had plenty to say about | :09:59. | :10:03. | |
other issues this week, too. One complaint focused on the practice | :10:03. | :10:07. | |
we discussed last week with regard to the US election of presenters | :10:07. | :10:17. | |
| :10:17. | :10:27. | ||
being sent on location to cover big Finally, this week saw the first | :10:27. | :10:30. | |
elections for Police and Crime Commissioners in England and Wales | :10:30. | :10:33. | |
with a mostly very low voter turnout, and we had some differing | :10:33. | :10:43. | |
| :10:43. | :11:08. | ||
Thank you for all your comments this week, positive and negative. | :11:08. | :11:13. | |
If you want to share your opinions on BBC news and current affairs, or | :11:13. | :11:23. | |
| :11:23. | :11:30. |