07/02/2014 Newswatch


07/02/2014

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 07/02/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

It is News watch with Samira Ahmed, and the art of the television news

:00:00.:00:10.

obituary. Hello and welcome to News watch with

:00:11.:00:14.

me, Samira Ahmed. An actor dies of a drugs overdose, how much news

:00:15.:00:18.

coverage does that warrant and her respectful fit the tone of victories

:00:19.:00:26.

the -- how respectful. Should the tone of obituaries. Viewers ask, do

:00:27.:00:32.

BBC staff need to be in the eye of the storm? And fake or fortune, why

:00:33.:00:37.

viewers of that BBC One programme knew the answer to the question

:00:38.:00:45.

before they had even watched it. News of the death of the actor,

:00:46.:00:48.

Philip Seymour Hoffman, broke early on Sunday evening. It led the BBC

:00:49.:00:54.

bulletin with a report from Nick Bryant in New York. Celebrated in

:00:55.:01:05.

Hollywood, the life of Philip Seymour Hoffman ended in the

:01:06.:01:07.

seclusion of his New York apartment, where he died following an apparent

:01:08.:01:12.

drug overdose. His body was reportedly discovered with a needle

:01:13.:01:17.

in his arm. What is believed to be heroin was also found at the scene.

:01:18.:01:23.

Not everyone approved of the coverage.

:01:24.:02:00.

We asked BBC News for a response to those complaints and were told...

:02:01.:02:19.

When reporting the death of public figures, we do take into account how

:02:20.:02:26.

they will be received among our audience. On Sunday night we also

:02:27.:02:28.

reported a number of other stories. This is not the first time the

:02:29.:02:39.

reporting of a death has provoked controversy among viewers about the

:02:40.:02:43.

amount of attention and the tone of obituaries. Two stories which

:02:44.:02:50.

resulted in some of the biggest complaint of recent years were the

:02:51.:02:56.

death of Michael Jackson in 2009 and of Amy Winehouse in 2011. Both

:02:57.:03:00.

resulted in widespread outpouring of grief. The controversy surrounding

:03:01.:03:05.

the death led to accusations of excessive focus on celebrities and

:03:06.:03:09.

overly sympathetic reporting. Political depth, such as that of

:03:10.:03:14.

Baroness Thatcher last year drew equally divided responses. Thousands

:03:15.:03:20.

complained about the blanket coverage of Nelson Mandela. There

:03:21.:03:25.

were complaints about the tone of the obituary of Ronnie Biggs and

:03:26.:03:30.

that of Lord McAlpine in January. Should one speak ill of the dead or

:03:31.:03:35.

should one always be respectful in obituaries? Joining me to discuss

:03:36.:03:44.

all those issues is Nick Higham. He has looked back on the lives of many

:03:45.:03:49.

figures in the news. Thank you for coming on the programme. Let's start

:03:50.:03:53.

with Philip Seymour Hoffman. It was interesting that the number of

:03:54.:03:56.

viewers felt the coverage was too prominent and he did not warrant

:03:57.:04:00.

that much attention. What did you make of that view? He led the

:04:01.:04:06.

bulletin at 10pm on Sunday evening. That was largely because there were

:04:07.:04:09.

other stories but they were not as strong. I think you need to

:04:10.:04:14.

distinguish between conventional obituaries, when somebody dies at a

:04:15.:04:22.

great age are to a long and valuable life, and we look back and celebrate

:04:23.:04:25.

that life and those people who die in other circumstances. That makes

:04:26.:04:31.

them news stories. The treatment of the Philip Seymour Hoffman story was

:04:32.:04:39.

much more of a news story than an obituary. There were complaints

:04:40.:04:43.

there was an outhouse bias. Many might not have seen his bills and he

:04:44.:04:51.

was not a very famous actor. -- his films. They say that scientists do

:04:52.:04:56.

not get proper obituaries but actors do. Actors, appearing on television,

:04:57.:05:04.

screen and films, there is a lot of material about them. Scientists

:05:05.:05:08.

often do not make television programmes. They work away from the

:05:09.:05:12.

public eye so it is much more difficult to craft an obituary about

:05:13.:05:20.

them. I did an obituary the other day of Christopher chat away. He was

:05:21.:05:24.

a middle distance runner in the 1950s. He was a world record holder

:05:25.:05:29.

who ran with Roger Bannister when he broke the four-minute mile. He was a

:05:30.:05:34.

pioneering television reporter. He was a Conservative MP and the

:05:35.:05:36.

minister who produced commercial television. Many came up to me who

:05:37.:05:43.

had not heard of him and said, Goss, wasn't he interesting! There is a

:05:44.:05:51.

sense there is an implicit danger of glorifying a celebrity drug abuse

:05:52.:05:58.

death. I understand why people say that. To shy away from the cause of

:05:59.:06:03.

death would be dishonest. You have to say he died in the prime of

:06:04.:06:10.

life. Why? He was a drug user. Where someone has been controversial and

:06:11.:06:13.

private lives have been difficult, where they have done things which

:06:14.:06:16.

are perhaps reprehensible, it would be wrong of us to shy away from that

:06:17.:06:24.

and not to talk about it. The BBC does prepare profiles in advance. As

:06:25.:06:29.

someone who has done it a lot, how does it work? How tricky is it

:06:30.:06:37.

preparing films about people who are still with us? There are many people

:06:38.:06:43.

about whom we would want to run obituaries. You are looking for good

:06:44.:06:47.

pictures and someone who has lived an interesting and significant

:06:48.:06:52.

life. They have had a significant impact. It helps but is not

:06:53.:06:56.

essential that people recognise them and know them. If there is some

:06:57.:07:01.

element of controversy, you want to reflect that. You must not shy away

:07:02.:07:07.

from bad news. My biggest failure many years ago in obituaries was

:07:08.:07:12.

when Robert Maxwell died. We ran an obituary, because we were not

:07:13.:07:16.

certain he was dead at the time. We were always afraid he might come

:07:17.:07:23.

back and sue us for libel if he were not dead. I knew he was a crook but

:07:24.:07:30.

I think we short-changed our viewers. Thank you so much. You can

:07:31.:07:39.

let us know your thoughts on TV obituaries by phone, e-mail or

:07:40.:07:42.

Twitter. Details coming up later. First, some of the topics which have

:07:43.:07:47.

caught your attention this week, starting with the attention given to

:07:48.:07:51.

the trip of Prince Charles to the flood hit Somerset Levels.

:07:52.:08:16.

This week 's floods also prompted comments with or familiar ring.

:08:17.:08:23.

There were concerns that BBC staff might be endangering themselves and

:08:24.:08:28.

setting a bad example to others in the wet and windy locations from

:08:29.:08:31.

where they were reporting. We were told that BBC staff or undergo

:08:32.:08:40.

safety training. Now complaints have resurfaced, following reports this

:08:41.:08:45.

week, such as these. People are offering each other places to stay.

:08:46.:08:50.

Cattle are being taken to auction. You get the sense that the time is

:08:51.:08:54.

up and the water is encroaching that bit further up all the time. It has

:08:55.:08:59.

really taken a turn for the worse. Their ways are starting to come over

:09:00.:09:06.

the wall. It is very damp and windy. -- be waves. It has been a ferocious

:09:07.:09:14.

night. Have you done enough to protect communities like this? Very

:09:15.:09:19.

much so. I think we will leave it there because it is starting to

:09:20.:09:24.

become unsafe. We are going to move. There is one message from the

:09:25.:09:27.

Environment Agency to be ballooning in these areas, do not come down and

:09:28.:09:29.

take a look. Finally, the strange Case of the

:09:30.:10:11.

businessman who paid ?100,000 for a work of art by the artist Marc

:10:12.:10:18.

Chagall. The discovery was made on BBC One programme shown on Sunday

:10:19.:10:22.

evening. Before that, BBC Television, radio and online news

:10:23.:10:25.

had already carried the story that it was indeed a forgery, thus

:10:26.:10:31.

upsetting 150 or so viewers who contacted us.

:10:32.:11:05.

Thanks to those who got in touch this week. You can telephone us, or

:11:06.:11:16.

e-mail. You may feature your message or even invite you to appear on the

:11:17.:11:23.

programme. You can search the topics we have previously covered on the

:11:24.:11:30.

website. That is all from us. We will back to hear your thoughts

:11:31.:11:32.

about BBC News coverage again next week. Goodbye.

:11:33.:11:39.

Hello. The coast will be a dangerous place to be again over the next

:11:40.:11:48.

couple of days. More storms heading in from the Atlantic with the

:11:49.:11:51.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS