Browse content similar to 07/02/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
It is News watch with Samira Ahmed, and the art of the television news | :00:00. | :00:10. | |
obituary. Hello and welcome to News watch with | :00:11. | :00:14. | |
me, Samira Ahmed. An actor dies of a drugs overdose, how much news | :00:15. | :00:18. | |
coverage does that warrant and her respectful fit the tone of victories | :00:19. | :00:26. | |
the -- how respectful. Should the tone of obituaries. Viewers ask, do | :00:27. | :00:32. | |
BBC staff need to be in the eye of the storm? And fake or fortune, why | :00:33. | :00:37. | |
viewers of that BBC One programme knew the answer to the question | :00:38. | :00:45. | |
before they had even watched it. News of the death of the actor, | :00:46. | :00:48. | |
Philip Seymour Hoffman, broke early on Sunday evening. It led the BBC | :00:49. | :00:54. | |
bulletin with a report from Nick Bryant in New York. Celebrated in | :00:55. | :01:05. | |
Hollywood, the life of Philip Seymour Hoffman ended in the | :01:06. | :01:07. | |
seclusion of his New York apartment, where he died following an apparent | :01:08. | :01:12. | |
drug overdose. His body was reportedly discovered with a needle | :01:13. | :01:17. | |
in his arm. What is believed to be heroin was also found at the scene. | :01:18. | :01:23. | |
Not everyone approved of the coverage. | :01:24. | :02:00. | |
We asked BBC News for a response to those complaints and were told... | :02:01. | :02:19. | |
When reporting the death of public figures, we do take into account how | :02:20. | :02:26. | |
they will be received among our audience. On Sunday night we also | :02:27. | :02:28. | |
reported a number of other stories. This is not the first time the | :02:29. | :02:39. | |
reporting of a death has provoked controversy among viewers about the | :02:40. | :02:43. | |
amount of attention and the tone of obituaries. Two stories which | :02:44. | :02:50. | |
resulted in some of the biggest complaint of recent years were the | :02:51. | :02:56. | |
death of Michael Jackson in 2009 and of Amy Winehouse in 2011. Both | :02:57. | :03:00. | |
resulted in widespread outpouring of grief. The controversy surrounding | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
the death led to accusations of excessive focus on celebrities and | :03:06. | :03:09. | |
overly sympathetic reporting. Political depth, such as that of | :03:10. | :03:14. | |
Baroness Thatcher last year drew equally divided responses. Thousands | :03:15. | :03:20. | |
complained about the blanket coverage of Nelson Mandela. There | :03:21. | :03:25. | |
were complaints about the tone of the obituary of Ronnie Biggs and | :03:26. | :03:30. | |
that of Lord McAlpine in January. Should one speak ill of the dead or | :03:31. | :03:35. | |
should one always be respectful in obituaries? Joining me to discuss | :03:36. | :03:44. | |
all those issues is Nick Higham. He has looked back on the lives of many | :03:45. | :03:49. | |
figures in the news. Thank you for coming on the programme. Let's start | :03:50. | :03:53. | |
with Philip Seymour Hoffman. It was interesting that the number of | :03:54. | :03:56. | |
viewers felt the coverage was too prominent and he did not warrant | :03:57. | :04:00. | |
that much attention. What did you make of that view? He led the | :04:01. | :04:06. | |
bulletin at 10pm on Sunday evening. That was largely because there were | :04:07. | :04:09. | |
other stories but they were not as strong. I think you need to | :04:10. | :04:14. | |
distinguish between conventional obituaries, when somebody dies at a | :04:15. | :04:22. | |
great age are to a long and valuable life, and we look back and celebrate | :04:23. | :04:25. | |
that life and those people who die in other circumstances. That makes | :04:26. | :04:31. | |
them news stories. The treatment of the Philip Seymour Hoffman story was | :04:32. | :04:39. | |
much more of a news story than an obituary. There were complaints | :04:40. | :04:43. | |
there was an outhouse bias. Many might not have seen his bills and he | :04:44. | :04:51. | |
was not a very famous actor. -- his films. They say that scientists do | :04:52. | :04:56. | |
not get proper obituaries but actors do. Actors, appearing on television, | :04:57. | :05:04. | |
screen and films, there is a lot of material about them. Scientists | :05:05. | :05:08. | |
often do not make television programmes. They work away from the | :05:09. | :05:12. | |
public eye so it is much more difficult to craft an obituary about | :05:13. | :05:20. | |
them. I did an obituary the other day of Christopher chat away. He was | :05:21. | :05:24. | |
a middle distance runner in the 1950s. He was a world record holder | :05:25. | :05:29. | |
who ran with Roger Bannister when he broke the four-minute mile. He was a | :05:30. | :05:34. | |
pioneering television reporter. He was a Conservative MP and the | :05:35. | :05:36. | |
minister who produced commercial television. Many came up to me who | :05:37. | :05:43. | |
had not heard of him and said, Goss, wasn't he interesting! There is a | :05:44. | :05:51. | |
sense there is an implicit danger of glorifying a celebrity drug abuse | :05:52. | :05:58. | |
death. I understand why people say that. To shy away from the cause of | :05:59. | :06:03. | |
death would be dishonest. You have to say he died in the prime of | :06:04. | :06:10. | |
life. Why? He was a drug user. Where someone has been controversial and | :06:11. | :06:13. | |
private lives have been difficult, where they have done things which | :06:14. | :06:16. | |
are perhaps reprehensible, it would be wrong of us to shy away from that | :06:17. | :06:24. | |
and not to talk about it. The BBC does prepare profiles in advance. As | :06:25. | :06:29. | |
someone who has done it a lot, how does it work? How tricky is it | :06:30. | :06:37. | |
preparing films about people who are still with us? There are many people | :06:38. | :06:43. | |
about whom we would want to run obituaries. You are looking for good | :06:44. | :06:47. | |
pictures and someone who has lived an interesting and significant | :06:48. | :06:52. | |
life. They have had a significant impact. It helps but is not | :06:53. | :06:56. | |
essential that people recognise them and know them. If there is some | :06:57. | :07:01. | |
element of controversy, you want to reflect that. You must not shy away | :07:02. | :07:07. | |
from bad news. My biggest failure many years ago in obituaries was | :07:08. | :07:12. | |
when Robert Maxwell died. We ran an obituary, because we were not | :07:13. | :07:16. | |
certain he was dead at the time. We were always afraid he might come | :07:17. | :07:23. | |
back and sue us for libel if he were not dead. I knew he was a crook but | :07:24. | :07:30. | |
I think we short-changed our viewers. Thank you so much. You can | :07:31. | :07:39. | |
let us know your thoughts on TV obituaries by phone, e-mail or | :07:40. | :07:42. | |
Twitter. Details coming up later. First, some of the topics which have | :07:43. | :07:47. | |
caught your attention this week, starting with the attention given to | :07:48. | :07:51. | |
the trip of Prince Charles to the flood hit Somerset Levels. | :07:52. | :08:16. | |
This week 's floods also prompted comments with or familiar ring. | :08:17. | :08:23. | |
There were concerns that BBC staff might be endangering themselves and | :08:24. | :08:28. | |
setting a bad example to others in the wet and windy locations from | :08:29. | :08:31. | |
where they were reporting. We were told that BBC staff or undergo | :08:32. | :08:40. | |
safety training. Now complaints have resurfaced, following reports this | :08:41. | :08:45. | |
week, such as these. People are offering each other places to stay. | :08:46. | :08:50. | |
Cattle are being taken to auction. You get the sense that the time is | :08:51. | :08:54. | |
up and the water is encroaching that bit further up all the time. It has | :08:55. | :08:59. | |
really taken a turn for the worse. Their ways are starting to come over | :09:00. | :09:06. | |
the wall. It is very damp and windy. -- be waves. It has been a ferocious | :09:07. | :09:14. | |
night. Have you done enough to protect communities like this? Very | :09:15. | :09:19. | |
much so. I think we will leave it there because it is starting to | :09:20. | :09:24. | |
become unsafe. We are going to move. There is one message from the | :09:25. | :09:27. | |
Environment Agency to be ballooning in these areas, do not come down and | :09:28. | :09:29. | |
take a look. Finally, the strange Case of the | :09:30. | :10:11. | |
businessman who paid ?100,000 for a work of art by the artist Marc | :10:12. | :10:18. | |
Chagall. The discovery was made on BBC One programme shown on Sunday | :10:19. | :10:22. | |
evening. Before that, BBC Television, radio and online news | :10:23. | :10:25. | |
had already carried the story that it was indeed a forgery, thus | :10:26. | :10:31. | |
upsetting 150 or so viewers who contacted us. | :10:32. | :11:05. | |
Thanks to those who got in touch this week. You can telephone us, or | :11:06. | :11:16. | |
e-mail. You may feature your message or even invite you to appear on the | :11:17. | :11:23. | |
programme. You can search the topics we have previously covered on the | :11:24. | :11:30. | |
website. That is all from us. We will back to hear your thoughts | :11:31. | :11:32. | |
about BBC News coverage again next week. Goodbye. | :11:33. | :11:39. | |
Hello. The coast will be a dangerous place to be again over the next | :11:40. | :11:48. | |
couple of days. More storms heading in from the Atlantic with the | :11:49. | :11:51. |