10/11/2015 Outside Source

Hello, I'm Ros Atkins, this is Outside Source.

We'll start with a big moment for Europe.

The Prime Minister has formerly presented his demands

D IOC says that they could strip medals from athletes after the

doping scandal. We also have an interview with Aung San Suu Kyi. We

have a report on trends in Dubai. We are open for business online. We

will pick up your messages as we go along.

Today we shifted from talk to action in the UK's bid to renegotiate

Donald Tusk, President of the European Council

acknowledged receipt of a letter from David Cameron, and, as he puts

It lays out the changes that David Cameron wants made to the

The Prime Minister is seeking change on four main points.

For the -- be European Union and Eurozone are not the same thing. For

those of us who are outside of it, we need a modern membership that

works for us. So we need a target to cut the total burden on business and

in the same time we need to bring together all the different

proposals, promises and agreements for a single market. We need to

bring them all together into one clear commitment that rights

competitiveness into the DNA of all of Europe. It is national

parliaments that will remain the source of democratic legitimacy

inside the EU. It is to be richest Parliament I must account on the

budget and safeguarding our place in the single market. It is time to

give these national parliaments a greater say over EU lawmaking.

Britain has always been an open trading nation. We don't want to

change that, but we do want to find arrangements to allow a member state

like the UK to restore fairness to our immigration system and reduce

the high level of migration from within the EU into the UK. So the

letter has been sent. Donald Tusk has acknowledged receipt of it and

says negotiations can begin. In practical terms, what happens now. I

asked our correspondent in Brussels to help us with that.

This is not the first time that EU leaders have heard what David

Cameron once, but it is the first time they have been written down.

Now we move into this intense phase of negotiation. The European Council

will have one to one meetings with key figures from each member state.

They will go through the proposals David Cameron has laid out, see how

they can put them into practice and see if there is the political will

to do so. The hope is some deal can be thrashed out before a key meeting

here in December between European leaders, but it could stretch on

between that. There are some things that seem straightforward, the idea

of making the EU more competitive say, but restricting benefits from

migrant workers, EU leaders are warning that could be highly

problematic, even illegal. This next phase of the negotiation will be

crucial and will also be very difficult.

Is this negotiation just about Britain, or will any of the outcomes

affect all European Union members? David Cameron has tried to sell this

as much-needed reform for across the European Union. He says some of the

things he is proposing will improve the EU for everyone. He doesn't want

it to look as if it's just the UK kicking up a stink about certain

areas. There is broad consensus that that there needs to be change in

some areas of the EU. There is a willingness to go down some of those

roots, but the problem is the David Cameron is whether he has flagged

things other EU leaders aren't prepared to give him and on the

issue of benefits for migrant workers, the premier for the Czech

Republic for example has said that anything that will undermine free

movement will be hard to achieve. David Cameron is also playing to a

dual audience. He is trying to persuade Brussels that these reforms

are needed and they are worthwhile and at the same time satisfy

Eurosceptics in the UK that what he is doing is in the best interest of

Britain. It is a difficult tightrope for him to walk and it will get

harder as the negotiations move forward.

This will be a tough sell for David Cameron to some anti-EU campaigners.

Look at this tweet from an MEP. Let us talk about this idea of selling

reforms back to the UK. Our correspondent is in Westminster. I

guess some people won't accept the reforms, but Mr Cameron does. People

like Nigel Farage will never say, well done, this sounds like an

ambitious programme. It was never going to satisfy them. What has been

surprisingly today is the number of Conservative MPs in the House of

Commons who have been withholding their criticism over the last few

months, giving David Cameron time to think about this renegotiation, but

today in the House of Commons they were excoriating about what they

thought was a measly list of demands. Some of the pent-up

frustration they have felt burst out and a good chunk of the Tory party

in Parliament will, when the moment comes, the voting for Britain to

leave the European Union. As Alex said, the tightrope David Cameron

has been walking is coming up with a set of demands that are acceptable

to some of his critics in the UK, but can also get the agreement of 27

European countries. But when that leave Mr Cameron with a difficult

decision between the unity of his party or getting a deal that keeps

the UK inside the EU? David Cameron knows that when it comes to this

referendum, his party is split. There are about 100 Tory MPs who

might back the leave campaign. His line has always been given this

figure Shenzhen a chance. We now know in some detail what the four

objectives are. He must be pretty confident that across a broad swathe

of those objectives, he can bring a result back from Brussels. The big

question is how it will affect benefits to migrants. One of the

toxic issues in politics. David Cameron is making it known that he

thinks it is deliverable and he will be at the forefront of the campaign

to keep Britain in the European Union. If his party is having a

raging civil war behind him, he can live with that. As long as he can

get the package then it seems pretty certain he will be campaigning

Britain to stay in the EU. Do we have a date for the vote in the UK?

We don't. All we know it is it has to happen by the end of 2017. My

hunch is the government wants to get this out of the way as quickly as

possible. This part that be sparked money could be on a date as early as

next summer. Thank you for joining us. Let us turn to our other major

story. The huge doping scandal in athletics. The IOC is calling for

disciplinary action against Russians. They could strip medals.

They are talking about people who want medals, particularly at London

2012, could lose their medals and other athletes could be bumped up.

Also, the IOC has suspended Lamine Diack from his honorary position.

Russia has a different response. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov

said: If accusations are being voiced,

they should be supported As long as evidence is not provided,

it is difficult to accept Sport had never heard

anything quite like it. Yesterday's damning report into

state-run cheating laid bare the Russia faces an unprecedented ban

from next year's Rio Olympics and the head of athletics in the UK

says it is time to get tough. I don't really care what Russia does

if it is suspended, So point number one,

should it be suspended? Yes,

until it can prove it is compliant. If it refuses to do that, and some

of the signs over night were not encouraging, well, whatever the

consequences are, let's take them. Political tensions are rising,

Vladimir Putin is meeting with the country's sports chiefs tomorrow,

but his spokesman has done dismissed This sporting superpower will

discover its punishment at the end of the week, but the lab

at the heart of the scandal had I believe that problems obviously

exist, but Russia is on the path to Why is it that sports seems

so vulnerable to corruption? How is it that journalists are left

to uncover scandals such as this, And how on earth can athletics

recover its battered reputation? For these British athletes at

Lea Valley today, it was training as usual, but at a time when sport

is under scrutiny like never Hopefully it is fully investigated,

but for those athletes who are competing cleanly, and there is

a lot of athletes competing cleanly, I would not want the public to

think that everyone is cheating or everyone who wins must be cheating,

that is definitely not the case. For eight years he was deputy to the

man he replaced this year, Lamine Diack, now under investigation that

he took bribes to cover up doping, tonight suspended by the

International Olympic Committee. That has led to questions over

exactly what Coe knew and if he is the man to steer the sport

through its current crisis. We are looking for special

measures not to have to go through He has to grasp the nettle and say,

you have to do something very fast Tonight the IOC asked for

disciplinary action to be taken against athletes. And we have just

heard that Lamine Diack has resigned. We will be bringing you

more on that story. We will also be bringing you more on the 3-D drones

in Dubai. The SNP has said it would vote against any change that will

relax Sunday trading laws. The government needs to think again. We

are in favour of Sunday trading. It should not happen on the back of pay

cuts too often low-paid shop workers across the United Kingdom and that

is why we have indicated our opposition to the government's

proposals. They need to go away and think again because we need

safeguards and guarantees for shop workers, not just in Scotland, but

in England and Wales and Northern Ireland.

This is Outside Source. The lead story: The British Prime Minister

has laid out his demands for reforms of the EU. That is ahead of a

referendum on Britain's membership. Let's take a look at some of the

main stories: Two men have gone on trial in Ukraine accused of working

for Russian intelligence in the east of Ukraine.

They will want in the Russian army, but denied they were on active

service when they were captured. -- they were once in. Five footballers

in Nepal have been charged with treason over match fixing in the

World Cup qualifiers. It is something they denied.

This sounds great at first, but there is not much behind it.

Scientists say thermal images show high temperatures in the three

stones at the bottom of one of the great Pyramids. It seems this could

probably be explained by internal air currents. The story is popular.

You can find it in our most viewed. Let me bring you some astonishing

details are emerging about the vast alleged hacking crimes in the US.

Three men have been charged, accused of accessing the details of 100

million people. All of the copy I've seen about this describes details,

but what details have they seen, or are they alleged to have seen?

Basically, they are alleged to have access, actually through one of the

people's banking accounts, is customer data. They did not go in

and steal money from these customers from financial institutions, JP

Morgan being the biggest hit in 2014, it is really that they just

took their personal data and blasted out e-mails and other communications

to these customers. Basically encouraging them to buy certain

stocks. This was one of the schemes prosecutors are basically charging

them with. This pump and dump scheme, so they can manipulate stock

prices. This is what they have done with the data. Do we have a

statement from these men about how they will approach the charges? Two

of the men are Israeli. They are waiting for extradition to New York.

One is a US citizen. He is believed to be in Moscow and still a

fugitive. We don't have a statement from these men. Prosecutors have

said this is changing the game of hacking. It is changing it from

short profit hacking to a business model. In terms of the JP Morgan

Hack and the way these men tried to manipulate the stock market, they

are saying it is security fraud on cyber steroids. Very serious. And

the other charges they are up against, basically running illegal

online gambling. And also trying to help criminals make payments.

Money-laundering charges. So up to 23 cans -- 23 count indictment for

these men. These three have been charged in the largest US cyber

Hack, that features on the website. Let's turn to the Dubai airshow,

aircraft that contains 3-D printed components getting a lot of

attention. This is a jet powered drone made by Aurora flight

sciences. This is the first aircraft to be made entirely from 3-D printed

components. They are being made here. The nozzles sprays out tiny

strands built in plastic, moulding the sheik bilayers. Each one a mere

quarter of a millimetre thick. -- shape by layers. It builds the

shape. As they solidify it will form. This is sped up. In reality it

takes nine days to component one metre high. But it is still cheaper

to make aircraft parts this way than by traditional plastics moulding or

metal casting. You don't have to have a big manufacturing facility,

you don't need skilled labourers, you just need a space to put the

machines and if you meant to start it off. It isn't only drone makers

who use 3-D printed components. Playmakers, airpass, and Boeing have

into the planes will fly in. -- plane makers, Airbus come and

Boeing. More business at the same time

tomorrow. Let's update you with the situation in Myanmar. Aung San Suu

Kyi's party has won a landslide election. I still have to use

caveats, because the result has not been officially declared. We are

told that the official result could still be days away. Already, we know

what is happening is hugely significant. If we look at the last

50 years, well, for most of it Burma and Myanmar was under military rule.

Aung San Suu Kyi won in 1990 but the military was not keen on the

result. She then spent 15 of the next 21 years under house arrest.

Since 2011 the military has eased its grip on power. But only so far.

It automatically gets a quarter of the seats in parliament. To get a

majority, and thanks to the's party, or any party who majority,

actually has to get two thirds of the vote. Aung San Suu Kyi thinks

they have managed to do that. She has been speaking to the BBC.

When I met her today Aung San Suu Kyi had the smile of a victor. What

is your sense of how well your party has done? We probably will get

between... Around 75% in the union legislature. And that would be more

than enough to form Government? The minimum requirement is 57% if we are

to do it on our own. Do you believe the genitals, the people who have

controlled here for so -- do you believe the generals, the

people who have control take so long, will allow you to do that?

They can, if they wish, Jews to -- they can, if they wish, choose to

sabotage your party. It is the will of the people that will prevail. She

is barred from the President's job, something that was put in by the

military. Her solution, around the law. The Army make all of the

decisions. If I am required to field a president who meets the

requirements of section 59 F of the Constitution, all right, we will

find one. That will not stop me from making all of the decisions as the

leader of the ruling party. President but under a different

name. It is a name only, a rose by any other name.

CHUCKLES One of the most significant promises

in the interview was to protect minority Muslims like those being

targeted by Buddhist extremists. It is not going to be easy. Hatred will

not be removed easily. But we can work at it together. I'm confident

that the great majority of the people of this country want peace.

Is this a great moment of joy? This is just the beginning. We are at the

gate. There is a lot more to be done before our people will feel secure

enough to celebrate. That is a caution born of experience.

And thanks to keep talking about the need for patients at the end of

that. Given that the people who support her on the verge of this

victory are wondering -- given that the people who support her are on

the verge of a victory, they are wondering how long it will take.

Possibly a couple of weeks. I'm sure they are still waiting with

patients. Aung San Suu Kyi has told them to be patient. They are waiting

with patients, I believe. Did you ever believe you would be reporting

on this story, her standing on the edge of an election victory? I never

did. It is quite unbelievable. It is a big change for our country. It is

difficult express my emotions. How wonderful it is that the country is

moving towards her. What about the military, are they talking to the

press might Aung San Suu Kyi and her party are? They said to the press

before the elections that they would recognise the results if it is in

accordance with the election laws. That means they have, maybe, some

conditions, but they said in their campaign speech, those who vote are

friendly to military. It is a message.

Telling us we all have to be patient for that result. If you have any

questions, use this hashtag to get in touch. Gareth was watching is

saying why are we saying Myanmar instead of Burma... Well, it is a

gradual shift. The military rulers of the country decided they wanted

to change the name of the country to Myanmar. The BBC and others didn't

change. But because this is becoming much more widely used, not just in

Myanmar, but around the world. We started by using both named in our

scripts, but over time we have moved to using Myanmar, which is common

amongst most news organisations. I will be back in a moment.