25/02/2016 Outside Source

Hello, I'm Ros Atkins, this is Outside Source.

The partial clearance of the Jungle camp in Calais will go ahead.

Greece to Macedonia have to pass through. For much of the last three

days it stayed shut. More developments in the stand-off

between Apple and the FBI. Apple has filed a motion to stop the FBI

getting access and both of them have given statements today.

And a review into historic sexual abuse at the BBC has found

that the broadcaster repeatedly failed to stop "monstrous" behaviour

More important developments in the Europe migrant crisis.

The camp is known as the Jungle - hundreds of people have been living

there, hoping to get the chance to get to the UK.

The authorities say they'll use force to clear parts

Also Europe's politicians have held yet another meeting in Brussels

These pictures have come into the BBC Newsroom today.

More than 100 people were rescued while crossing from Turkey

Others are desperately trying to get through the Greek border

with Macedonia and further north large numbers are on

the move in Serbia - more still in northern France

Tomos Morgan is at the camp in Calais with more details.

The judge has ruled here in France that the authorities can destroy all

the second half of the migrant camp in Calais but they will do so

without force, they will try to persuade the migrants living in that

area to leave before they destroy any structures. They've assured the

migrants they will not be using bulldozers and going in with force

to destroy that area of the camp. They've also said that the community

pillars of the society such as the school, the legal centre, the

theatre and the church will remain, and the majority of the migrants

will be living in this centre behind me and in the structures that the

authorities have built. Those metal containers the government have

placed for those migrants. One reason people are getting stuck

at borders is that last week Austria imposed daily limits on the number

of migrants it lets in. That's having a knock

on effect further south. Our Europe editor has been

highlighting today that Greece has now recall that an EU ambassador

twice in three months. Wherever you look in western Europe at the

moment, you can see the pressure. One of those places

is Idomeni on the border At the main migrant camp on Reese 's

border with Macedonia, 3000 people are on a site built for half that

number Asch Micro Greece's border with Macedonia. This is the one gate

that migrants going from Greece to Macedonia have to pass through. For

much of the last three days it has stayed shut. The authorities say

that's because the next border going north is closed for much of the time

as well. It's the classic domino effect. Borders further north close,

so this one stays shut two. We come here, we wait seven hours, they say

the board is open. Sometimes people go through to the camp. Just over

the border a train was stuck for hours and frustrations grew. Just

wait! What's the problem? A backlog of coaches and communities is

building up down the line. This is a service station just short of the

border. Greece is in danger of becoming a warehouse of souls, say

they minister today, and lots of them are little souls. There has

been a sharp rise in the number of children on the move. These Iraqi

twins were born in Turkey and have been travelling all their life. We

have an increased concern for unaccompanied children, at Greek

level there is not sufficient capacity to shelter them, protect

them or give them basic care. I also talk to these Afghans and

Pakistanis, they won't be allowed to cross the border could they are not

-- because they are not Syrian or Iraqi. They will probably turn to

the hills and become people smugglers. In the last three days,

8000 people have arrived in Greece like this. They will try to push

north by whatever means, despite all the political rows.

This is a quite from the European Union commission for migration.

That same Commissioner has been online himself. I think a lot of us

covering this crisis would feel that a humanitarian crisis is already

upon us. I wanted understand more about why ten days has been set as a

deadline. Chris Morris is our Europe

Correspondent and I asked him why the commissioner was talking

about a 10 day deadline. Essentially, we need tangible

benefits on the ground. Ten days takes us roughly to the point where

EU leaders will hold yet another emergency summit, all the leaders,

David Cameron, Francois Hollande, Angela Merkel and others will be

here on March the 7th. I think there's a feeling amongst some,

we've heard this before, it's a deadline and if we don't meet this

deadline everything will break down, and somehow it rumbles on in chaos.

I think what's different is that number one we are seeing countries

taking unilateral action. Almost giving up on the idea of there

being, new Ripley in response. Number two, everyone knows we are in

late February and in about a month or so the sea will be calm, the

weather will be warmer. It is expected there will be a spike again

in the number of people crossing from Turkey to Greece. STUDIO: As

you've alluded to, the evidence is that already there is not unity.

What power does the European Union have 246 members to hold the line?

That's another thing we are seeing breakdown. Last year for example

there was an agreement at an EU summit by a qualified majority that

there should be mandated reacquaintance for relocating newly

arrived refugees across the continent. All member states have

signed up to those rules. Yesterday we heard that Hungary wants to hold

a referendum on whether to abide by that. We heard from EU officials

today saying, I'm not quite sure how hungry's commitment to European law

can coincide with its decision to hold a referendum and ignore those

laws -- Hungary's commitment to European law.

The report into the activities of Jimmy Savile at the BBC

was published today and it makes for a highly disturbing read.

Dame Janet Smith's review - which also includes the activities

of the broadcaster Stuart Hall - describes a culture at the BBC

in which their monstrous behaviour - those are her words

Dame Janet believes there were several missed

While millions were watching the BBC, no one was keeping

The BBC created him and allowed a paedophile to prey on viewers

And in the north, Stuart Hall was using his fame to sexually

It makes sorry reading for the BBC, Savile assaulting girls on Top

of the Pops, raping children and never stopped

because he was viewed as untouchable, yet many staff aware

Both of these men used their fame and position as BBC celebrities

They must be condemned for their monstrous behaviour.

But the culture of the BBC is certainly enabled both Savile

and Stuart Hall to go undetected for decades.

I have identified five occasions when the BBC missed an opportunity

You say no senior managers knew what Savile was up to.

Isn't this, as some of the victims think, a whitewash.

Kevin was just nine when Savile assaulted him after a visit

to Jim'll Fix It, one of 17 victims from the show.

They seem to be laying the blame at the feet of the junior managers.

I cannot believe that it has got no further up the chain.

Do you think people at the BBC could have stopped Savile?

My personal case was in 1976, and as I understand it,

there were accusations with Savile in the early 70s,

He received compensation from the BBC and does

The BBC failed you when it should have protected you.

I am deeply sorry for the hurt caused to each and every of you.

One casualty of this report, the DJ Tony Blackburn,

He said he had been hung out to dry after his evidence

He was the DJ behind headlines about a 15-year-old girl's suicide

in 1971, after allegations she was seduced by a celebrity.

Today, he denied any inappropriate conduct and said, they are

destroying my career and reputation because my version of events does

The BBC have decided to make me a scapegoat.

Tony Blackburn fell short of the standards of evidence such

I am making no judgment or accusations about the events

As for Stuart Hall, the report found senior managers knew

about his inappropriate sexual behaviour.

Amanda was assaulted by him after filming a programme.

The BBC are still guilty for the fact that they knew and no

Over the time, 40 years, I have thought to myself, should

It's all about the missed opportunities to stop

There is a recurrent theme into the reports

Despite 41 investigations into hospitals, 14 into schools

and care homes, and now this BBC report, with all the victims over

all the years, it seems no one in charge at any organisation seemed

This is the last major report into Savile.

The days of victims being told, keep your mouth shut,

There is extensive coverage of this report online from the BBC. We have

got the business coming up in a few minutes time. The stand-off between

the FBI and Apple continues to evolve. We also bring you a report

on the global beer industry. The owner of Alton Towers is to be

prosecuted over the accident last year. Merlin Attractions is to be

charged for breaching health and safety laws. Lawyer Paul Paxton

acting on behalf of five of the injured victims explained why he is

confident this is a prosecution in the public interest. I think it's

that saluted the right thing to do. Not just for my clients. You've got

families going out for a fun day in a fun park. To end up losing their

legs, that must be in the public interest to investigate. There in

mind that the investigation will review a whole wager factors which

will influence other rights in other parks, attention the around Europe

as well as in this country. This is Outside Source live

from the BBC newsroom. A French judge has ruled that

a partial clearance of the migrant camp in Calais in northern

France can go ahead. And let's get some other news

from around the BBC. A new study conducted

by US doctors in Liberia has that most survivors of Ebola

have developed body weakness, memory loss or depressive

symptoms in the six months Bad day for China's markets -

the share index dropped more than 6%, its biggest

fall for a month. And this is The Flying Scotsman

making its first journey It went from London to its new home

at Britain's National Railway Museum You can see the video

on the BBC News app. Apple's stand-off

with the FBI continues. The company is asking a federal

court to dismiss an earlier court order asking the FBI to unlock an

iPhone. This is for the investigation into the man involved

in the San Bernardino attack, 14 people died in California. The FBI

would like some help in getting through the security. We've heard

from both sides of the story today. Here's what Apple boss

Tim Cook has told ABC. For some people saying this was a

terrorist attack on US soil, and for Apple to make an exception that

might be this moment. Would you like to fly the flag on privacy and

safety? I think safety of the public is incredibly important. Safety of

The protection of people's data is incredibly important.

The trade-off here is we know that doing this could expose people

This is not something that we would create.

It would also set a precedent that I believe

many people in America would be offended by.

So when you think about those which are knowns, compared

to something that might be there, I believe we are making the right

In your quiet moments, do you have any concern you might be able to

prevent a terrorist attack? Some things are hard and some things are

right. And some things are both. This is one of those things. You've

talked to the president before on these issues. Are you disappointed

there wasn't more of a dialogue with the administration before this swift

action from the Justice Department? Yes. I think there should have been.

This filing... We found out about the filing from the press. I don't

think that's the way it should be run. I don't think that something is

so important to this country should be handled in this way. That's one

side of the story. Let's get the other.

Well FBI director James Comey was testifying today before

a Senate Intelligence Committee - and he struck a more conciliatory

Conversation and negotiation is the way to resolve this. I'd been very

keen to keep the bureau out of the policy-making business. I think

we've two roles in this context. We must do a competent investigation

following the murder of 14 people in San Bernardino, and we will. We'll

use whatever lawful tours are available to us. In the larger

conversation I think our role is to make folks understand what are the

costs associated with moving to a world of universe. Encryption. Help

me understand precisely what Apple has done with this legal move today?

We've known Apple's position on this for quite some time, since last week

when the court order was made. Today they filed their official response.

Essentially they are asking the court to throw out the order and say

Apple should not be compelled to do what the FBI is asking. Apple say

they have done above and beyond what they are legally required to do.

They are invoking their first Amendment rights, they say the code

they use to write their software should be considered their speech

and their right to free speech. They've stepped it up a gear. They

are basically saying, this isn't something that should be decided in

court, they want a special commission setup to go through the

various issues. Judging by what the FBI has said, that is looking fairly

likely. It's been interesting to see the big tech companies all start to

consider the ramifications of this case. A lot of the companies were

fairly tentative at first, saying yes they support them in theory. Now

that's been stepped up. We heard today that Microsoft will come

forward and submit a motion to the court which essentially backs up

Apple's stance. They feel the case is relevant to them even though they

are not directly involved. Microsoft will filed this brief to say, we

support what Apple are saying and we are concerned about the implications

of this order were it to be forced upon Apple. We understand Google is

preparing a similar brief. Apple has the official supporter of the

companies as well as the numerous tweets and messages we've seen from

other bosses from various companies in the tech industry. I'm finding it

hard to imagine this will be resolved one way or another in the

next few days. Yes. I'd be surprised if it was. It could go in several

directions from here. The judge in San Bernardino could refuse Apple's

motion, the next stage is a hearing on the 22nd of March in San

Bernardino. You would imagine Apple would be keen to avoid that

happening, because of course while support in a place like San

Francisco is plentiful, in a place like San Bernardino where the

tragedy happened that will be harder to come by. It could be thrown out

by the court, at which point, who knows where it will go next. Perhaps

this special commission will be set up by Congress to look into the

matter. Apple mentioned in its response to the court that Congress

has discussed this issue at length and backed away from forcing

companies to do things. Apple hopes that will happen again in this case.

One of the more compelling stories we've had in silicon valley for some

time. A historic deal to take over

Japanese electronics giant Sharp The $4.3bn takeover by Taiwanese

manufacturers Foxconn - which makes most of the world's

iPhones - would be the first foreign takeover of a major Japanese

electronics firm - What's the possible catch? Sharp

apparently submitted some paperwork to Fox con about a day before the

deal was meant to go through in which they outlined essentially some

unforeseen costs that Foxconn would be taking on. We haven't seen the

actual documents themselves so we don't know the sums involved but

clearly big enough because Sharp put out a press three saying this deal

was going ahead on while Foxconn said we need to revise this first.

Last-minute hitches are common but it is still a bit embarrassing. Lots

of people are watching around the world and will especially know

Sharp, they may not know Foxconn but will probably have something in the

house produced by it. Foxconn makes the parts, it does a lot of work for

Apple and the iPhone. That's why in part they want to try and do a deal

with Sharp. They are hoping the two companies together will be able to

take on Saint-Saens and will have more leveraged in their negotiations

with Apple -- many people are saying this deal with Sharp would have been

evidence of the deal foreign investors are looking for. There's

been a lot of tension on the beer industry. Some reports say there has

been a slowdown.