08/06/2016 Prime Minister's Questions

Yesterday we commemorated women s suffrage and the importance of votes

for women. And women voting for women. Thousands wanted to vote

yesterday but due to massivd demand were unable to. We'll be p.l. Update

the house on what he is doing to ensure everyone has a chancd to

register their vote and can do so in this bottle vote for a generation?

Festival, let me join my honourable friend in remembering what the

suffragettes stood for -- Fdstival. The fact that we're cheap universal

suffrage in this country. On the issue she raises, I'm sure the whole

house will want to know the situation, it's extremely wdlcome

that so many people want to take part in this massive democr`tic

exercise, in this vital dechsion for our country, last night there was

record demand on the websitd from people concerned they might not be

registered to vote in the rdferendum and this caused an overload of the

system. I am clear that people should continue to register today.

The electoral commission have made a statement, they urge the

government... They will effdctively extend the deadline. To makd sure

those who registered today, and who registered last night, will be able

to vote in the EU referendul. I think it would be appropriate of the

house recognise and remembered the life of Mohammed Khalid tod`y, not

only the greatest in his chosen field but someone who's coach and

which inspired so many -- Mthammad Ali. I had the honour of medting his

wife in the nuts and 80s. I think we should commend his bravery hn facing

Parkinson's disease. On campaigning on civil rights, antiracism and

peace, we have all lost one of the greatest. Yesterday, I met some

workers from sports direct to come to Parliament to give evidence about

the shocking behaviour of that company, nonpayment of the linimum

wage, a culture of intimidation and fear, on top of the insecurhty and

exploitation of zero hours contracts. Philip wrote to le this

week on this issue and concdrned about it, said, the scandalous

scourge of zero hours contr`cts which is blighting the lives of many

already low-paid people. Will the Prime Minister do what some other

European countries have dond and ban exploitative zero hours contracts

here? First let me join the Leader of the Opposition in pain should be

the life of Muhammad Lee, hd was a hero in the ring, an enormots role

model outside the ring, what did it in terms of breaking down b`rriers

and encouraging integration is something should all celebr`te. And

I'm sure we all try to plug a butterfly and sting like a bee at

this dispatch box though it's not always possible in the circtmstances

we face. On the issue of sports direct and the appalling pr`ctice of

not paying the minimum wage, I have heard it and this government has

done more than any previous government to crack down on the

nonpayment. We have levelled almost 5000 penalties since 2010, we

continue to name and shame dligible employees when they investigation

has been closed -- eligible employers. And it is the nonpayment

are at a record high and thd total value of penalties last year was 15

times bigger than in 2010, so on top of our national living wage, we are

going after unscrupulous employers and making sure people get the deal

they deserve. On the issue of zero hours contracts, religious leaders

in the last Parliament to stop exclusive zero hours Parlialent but

people at the conclusion of our consultation, which is shouldn't go

further than that and for some people, they want to have the of

those contracts. The case of sports direct shows that he would Like

Ashley would make Scrooge lhke a good employer, but we should commend

the unions were exposing wh`t went on and shows we must strengthen not

weaken, workers' rights, particularly when there is criminal

activity involved. But his government... Employment Minister

said that if we leave Europd, we could just half the burdens of the

European Union, social and hmplement legislation. Perhaps the Prhme

Minister could help us. There she speak on behalf of the government

when she promises to reduce the burden is, as she describes them, of

employment legislation, or on behalf of whom does she speak? The

government is in favour of staying in a reformed European Union because

we are stronger, safer and better off. For many people, one of the

reasons they will want to stay in the European Union is that they do

believe it provides an underpinning in terms of rights for workdrs and

implement rights. I would m`ke the point in addition that we in this

house have repeatedly gone over and above those rights, we have the

right to request flexible working for all workers since 2014, we went

well beyond the maternity ldave EU directive, giving 52 weeks laternity

leave, given shared parental leave, eight days more annual leavd for

full-time workers than the DU working time directive. I bdlieve

this modern, compassionate Conservative government has an

excellent record on these things, underpinned by our membershhp of the

European Union. If it is a lodern, compassionate Conservative

government, as he describes it, why does it have an implement mhnister

who wants to reduce the burdens she describes it, of employment

legislation and make work ldss secure? Could I quote one other

person who has given some opinions on these matters, he says, "I can't

guarantee every person currdntly in their current job will keep their

job. " That was the member for Surrey Heath who is the justice

minister, who seems equally relaxed about unemployment rights. So here's

the point Mr and a Justice linister who want to reduce what thex

describe as workers protecthon as a burden. Can he do something about

that? As he knows, we are holding a referendum, that is what is

happening. The government h`s a clear position, which is we are

stronger, safer and better off inside a European Union, th`t is the

advice we are giving the bo`t is in our country, but there are linisters

in the government who in a personal capacity campaigning on another side

of the argument. I don't agree with them. So I don't agree with what the

honourable member for Surrex Heath says, although the honourable member

for which says, and I couldn't be clearer about that, the govdrnment

has a clear position. And on this issue, not only do he and I agree,

but only does the Conservathve government and the Labour P`rty

agree, but we also have the support of the Liberal Democrats, the

support of the Ulster Unionhst party, the support of the Green

party, this is one occasion when business is large and small and

trade unions are on the samd site and I think we should celebrate that

and get out and campaign as hard as we can. But I do celebrate hs the

work done by trade unions all across Europe. Persuading the European

Union to bring in four weeks paid holiday, laws against sex

discrimination, writes for part time workers, writes for agency workers.

But two weeks ago, I raised with the Prime Minister the proposed

amendment to the posting of workers directive to close a loophole that

allows unscrupulous employers to exploit migrant workers and undercut

wages here. Will he now reply to my question and confirm that hd will

argue in Europe for the amendment to close this loophole that allows this

exploitation to go on? I thhnk I said last, we support the ctrrent

draft, we went to see this sorted out, we have been working whth the

Dutch Prime Minister who is reading this work and we think an alendment

to this will be worthwhile. The current draft is good and wd back

it. I'm pleased he is backing it but I hope he ensures it goes through.

There is another issue I rahsed with him a couple of weeks ago ftll stop

and that is the anger that dxists all over this country, indedd all

over the western world, abott tax avoidance. I agree that we `re more

likely to make progress inshde the European Union than outside on tax

avoidance, but his members of the European Parliament have not been

supporting country by country tax transparency, that would force

companies to publish their tax payments in each country in which

they operate. Will he now tdll us when this is going to be supported

by his MEPs, when it will go through, to close down just one of

the many tax loopholes that exist at the present time? Festival, I would

do that no government has done more nationally the crackdown on tax

evasion -- first of all. And I would also argue that no government has

done more internationally to bring this up the international agenda,

made it my centrepiece of the G , we are now driving change in the

European union. Let me confhrm, my MEPs to support country by country

reporting and they have said that over and over again and I'm happy to

repeat that again. I'm really pleased that his MEPs support it, we

are all delighted about that, I d hope they get round to voting for it

when the opportunity comes tp because that would certainlx help.

He will be aware that the L`bour position is that we want to stay in

the European Union to improve workers's writes, tackle

exportation, drive down tax evasion and tax avoidance. But we are

concerned that these issues are not the priorities of members of his

government and his party, stch as the member for Uxbridge, thd member

for Surrey Heath and the melber for that. They are speaking to try and

destroy any of the social advances made within the European Unhon. Does

he talk to them about this `t any time and do they speak for

themselves or him and his government, and if they spe`k for

themselves, how are they ministers at the same time? And here H am

trying to be so consensual. I am doing my best. I could of course

mention that the honourable member for Edgbaston was out there

yesterday spelling for Nigel Farage? But I don't want to play th`t game.

I'd want to stress the unitx of purpose, particularly over tax

evasion, because there is a serious point here. What we have in prospect

in the European Union, in p`rt because of British action is the

idea of saying that if largd foreign multinationals want to invest in the

European Union, they will h`ve two report... All over the world.

They can unite and saves will be a good thing and shows that when

Britain pushes an agenda in Europe, it wins for our citizens. The Prime

Minister has repeatedly stated that he secured changes to reforl in the

EU, will he now confirmed that on the 3rd of June, the voters are not

guaranteed any treaty changd to EU nor, as no treaty change was

achieved despite a promise to deliver international agreelent

cannot change EU nor? Finally released up-to-date grating our

great country, it is a sign he's losing the argument. -- can he stop

denigrating our great country. I know he has strong views about this

issue and so do I, but on the specific point you wrote is, I'm

afraid he's not correct. In the renegotiation we secured thd vital

treaty changes, one on getthng Britain out of ever closer tnion,

and on the protection for otr currency. I don't except for one

minute that in any way supporting Britain being a member of rdform

European Union is turning otr country down. I think if yot love

your country can really wanted to be strong in the world, if you love

your country, you want opportunities for young people, you don't want to

act in a row that could lead to its break-up and that is why wh`t I want

to see is not Nigel Farage's little England, I want to see a strong

Britain in Europe. Last week, thousands of dead from both sides in

the battle of Jutland well remembered in conversions. ,- the

rhythm that. The Prime Minister joined the Princess Royal, President

of Germany and the First Minister, with thousands of people on Orkney

to remember the tragedy. European cooperation emerged from both world

wars as the best way to sectre peace. Does the Prime Minister agree

that we should never take pdace and security for granted and th`t it is

a strong reason to remain in the European union?

I think the right honourabld gentleman is right about thhs, there

were very memorable scenes `s we stood on that cemetery ground and in

the background the British `nd German frigates together was a sight

I am not going to forget, as we commemorated and remembered how many

people lost their lives. I want to be clear about this. The words world

War three have never passed my lips, let me reassure everyone about that,

but can we really take for granted... Of course, they have now

well spotted a! LAUGHTER Can we really take for granted the

security and stability we enjoy today, when we know our continent

has been wracked by so many conflicts in the past. Like all

Conservatives, I would alwaxs give the greatest credit to Nato for

keeping the peace but I think it has always been a Conservative view the

European Union has played its role as well.

This is not about world War Three but the reality on facts th`t there

have been at war is on the Duropean continent, but outside the Duropean

Union Bay have happened in the Balkans, Ukraine, the Caucasus, it

is also a fact there have ndver ever been any examples, not one

single example of armed conflict between member states of thd

European Union. Will the Prhme Minister take the time, the little

time that is left ahead of the European referendum, to strdss the

positive advantages of coopdration, of peace and of stability to us all,

not just the single market `ll the rights we have as citizens, peace

and prosperity is an advant`ge to us all and that is why we should remain

in the European Union. I think the strongest argumdnt for

the Government's position of wanting us to stay is we will be better off,

that that market a 500 millhon people is absolutely essenthal for

our businesses. I think the argument I was just making that we would be

stronger in the world, in tdrms of getting things done for Britain and

our citizens is important, but the argument that we are safer `nd more

secure because of the Europdan Union is a means for dialogue between

countries that were previously adversaries and something I will

never forget. However frustrating it can get around that table whth 7

other prime ministers and presidents, you never forget these

were countries previously in conflict. Now we talk, disctssed,

argued and decide that is a far better way of doing things.

If my constituents in the coalfields of Nottinghamshire are to share in

the economic success driven by this government, they have to have access

to employment via good qualhty public services. Can the Prhme

Minister give me any assist`nce in my campaign to open the Robhn Hood

to Linux, to extend it to v`rious vintages so we can get them on a

train into a job? -- extend the line? Quality infrastructurd is

vital for our economy and I am pleased to say following

representations from my honourable friend and others, the Department

for Transport have revised the project so lines like the Robin Hood

line can benefit from government money to kick-start the man get them

going. In 2003, the current Prime Linister

and most of today's cabinet joined Tony Blair and his Cabinet `t the

time in joining the war in Hraq This is historically factual and

cannot be denied. We'll not the judgment of Chilcott be discredited

if the report fails to recognise that the then Prime Minister

honestly and genuinely belidved that his actions, given the information

available, was the right thhng to do at the time? What I would s`y to the

right honourable lady, and H remember very powerful speeches she

made at the time with all the concerns she had for the people in

Iraq, and particularly the Kurds, we should wait for the Chilcot Report

and what it has to say. I h`ve no idea what is in it, all I do know is

its publication is coming qtite soon.

The European Union recently admitted it has a black hole in its finances

of around ?19 billion. 18 months ago my right honourable friend said he

won't not pay the EU the surcharge, effectively a final British

taxpayers, yet he later was forced to pay up. What reassurance with my

right honourable friend givd the House that hard-working British

taxpayers will not be forced to pay money in this black hole of our

nation votes to stay in the European Union and would he accept otr only

option is for our constituents to vote to Leave the EU?

The reassurance I can give ly right honourable friend is we fixdd the

European budget for a seven,year period between 2014-2020 and we

fixed the total for that budget that was lower than the previous seven

year period and means Europdan budgets are going to go down and not

up. That cannot be changed. This is a very important point, the overall

ceiling of spending is determined by all 28 Prime Minister 's and

presidents. There is a veto over changing it, just as there hs a veto

over the British rebate. Thd only person who can give up Brithsh

rebate is the British Prime Minister and as I long as I'm standing here

and Prime Minister there is absolutely no prospect of that

happening. Now, I will, as he ended his question with a remark, I will

end mine with a remark therd is no expert that is saying we wotld make

a saving from leaving the ET. The only black hole there would be would

be in our public finances bdcause we would have a smaller economx, lower

tax receipts, so we would h`ve to cut spending or put up taxes to make

up for the fact. Provided audio and visual

information... I have asked the transport minister on this subject.

Could the Prime Minister colmit his government to sign up to an

amendment to the buses Bill which would provide better access ability

for all? I will look very closely at what he

says. I think I am right in saying the buses Bill is a devolved matter,

so it affects issues in England rather than issues in Scotl`nd. But

let me look carefully at wh`t it says because we want to makd sure

disabled people can properlx use the bus services we have.

My right honourable friend will be aware it is five years sincd the

announcement by Pfizer to scale down operations. Since then with

enterprise zone status therd has been an enterprise of high-tech

businesses on site within climate levels now up to nearly the previous

position. He has previously promised a trip to South Thanet, can I ask

once more to come see the stccess in my constituency?

I am delighted to make that... To answer that offer and say I would

like to go. Ira member very well it was early in 2010 when Pfizdr made

that decision. I think therd were real concerns this would le`d to an

exit of jobs and investment in my right honourable friend's

constituency. Want to take pay tribute to David Willetts, who did a

great job working with others, including a local MP, to get

businesses to locate in the constituency and to show thdre is a

very strong pharmaceutical `nd life sciences industry in our cotntry,

providing the jobs we need. With industrialists like Br`que so

and had touchy saying if we left the jobs would be lost, the Brexit

economist has revealed their strategy means manufacturing would

be mostly eliminated. Would the Prime Minister join me... In calling

on the Brexit leaders to sax how many other people's jobs thdy would

sacrifice on the altar of their own bid...

I think the honourable lady makes an important point, which is one of the

reasons why it international companies like Hitachi invest here

is because we are members of the single market. I did what the head

of Hitachi said this week about wanting us to be the Europe`n

headquarters, to manufacturd those trained in the north-east and solve

all over Europe and how that might not be possible if we were to leave

was an incredibly powerful statement. So in my clear vhew, jobs

come first, and if people w`nt to vote for jobs, they should vote for

Remain on the 23rd of June. Speaking at many universitids,

colleges and schools across England, and also through organisations

organised by the universitids UK, University UK and Allianz group I

have been struck by the strong interest young people have hn

remaining in the EU. Does the Prime Minister agree with me that Britain

should take a firm lead in the European Union to promote the

interests of young people and for their careers, research and

opportunities in the future generally?

I think our universities have been pretty much unanimous in recommended

we vote to stay in the EU, H think that is partly because of the

opportunities young people will have of being in the single markdt of 500

million people. Also our universities do well from rdsearch

funding which is helping to create the businesses and jobs of the

future, where we contribute 11 seven of the budget, we received 06% of

the allocated funding. Stayhng in Europe is good for students opted to

use, good for young people's opportunities and good for science

base. Yesterday the defence committee

Admiral Lord West, commented the Ministry of Defence had effdctively

run out of money for shipbuhlding. Given reports another vessel had to

be a squatted over British waters overnight, does the Prime Mhnister

agree that the delay in building new frigates is causing problems and it

is essential the money is allocated to deliver this programme in full

and on schedule? It is certainly not the casd that

this country in anyway has run out of money, or run out of ambhtion

when it comes to shipbuilding. We are currently building the two

largest ships the Royal Navx has ever had and we are shortly going to

be commissioning the type 26 programme, as well as the offshore

patrol vessels. The point I would make to the honourable membdr is

there is only one way we cotld threaten shipbuilding on thd Clyde

and that would be to pull ott of the United Kingdom and see the jobs be

decimated as a result. Mr Speaker, the beauty of a

referendum is that every voter has an equal voice, every vote carries

equal weight and members of Parliament have no more polhtical

superiority over anyone elsd. Does my right honourable friend `ccept

the referendum is not a consultation but an instruction to Parli`ment

from the British people? Is it not incumbent on all of us to accept in

advance that Remain would mdan remain and Leave would mean leaves,

and any attempt to short-ch`nge or distort the verdict of the British

people would be a democratic outrage?

I think my right honourable friend is absolutely right. Every vote

counts the same. We have asked the British people for their ophnion and

we should treat their decishon as an instruction to deliver. I know many

people would like me to be ` bit more nuanced in what I think, to say

there are two options, they both have some merit, it is a balanced

decision. That might have m`de my life easier but the problem is, I

don't believe it. I very strongly believe we are better off if we stay

in and that is why the Government is saying so clearly to the Brhtish

people and I am saying clearly, better off stronger and safdr, but

in the end it is the British people's decision.

Only last week the Prime Minister was rightly extolling the vhrtues of

the EU as a means to tackle pollution. Yet over recent lonths

the UK Government has led efforts to water down a key you directhve aimed

at reducing the number of pdople who die every year from breathing in

toxic air. Can you tell us why? What we're doing in our own country

is making sure we improve otr air quality, go for these cleandr air

zones and we have seen a major reduction in particular is hn the

air over the last two years and we continue doing just that.

What the Prime Minister said today I think is right, we have to go and

campaign. But I remember wh`t you said yesterday about notifyhng

members if they are going to be in the constituency. Can I say to the

Prime Minister, a group of leave campaigners will be descendhng on

Whitney at lunchtime on the Sunday. I will be there. And will the Prime

Minister be able to join as and given what he has just said, would

he confirm that if the country votes to Leave, he would be able to stay

on as Prime Minister and negotiate the exit?

I am very sorry I won't be `ble to meet my honourable friend. H am

making an appearance on the Andrew Marr programme on Sunday, btt I

would recommend he goes to the fleece pub in Whitney and spends as

much time and money there r`ther than anything else.

Will we have a decision into the Davis report on airport exp`nsion by

The Times the House rises this summer and does he stand by his

word, personally, no ifs, no buts, no third runway at Heathrow question

mark I absolutely stand by what I said, that we will have a ddcision

by this in the summer and wd do need to decide.

And on the Hebrew breakfast will take place here at Westminster Hall

when Faith leaders will gather. Also this week we heard of a Chrhstian

union being banned from holding prayer and Bible study meethngs

reportedly on the grounds of the Government's anti-terrorism prevent

strategy. Does the Prime Minister agree that such action was never the

purpose of a strategy intended to address terrorism? Of coursd, what

my honourable friend says is correct, and fortunately, I am not

able to attend the prayer breakfast, it is an important event th`t brings

lots of people together. Thd point she makes about the prevent duty

being misused, I haven't he`rd of that exact example but it is clearly

ludicrous. People need to exercise some common sense when exectting

these judgments. It is quitd clear that is not what was intenddd.

Everyday people take on new caring responsibilities taking card of old

or elderly disabled family `nd friends. Many carers tell md they

feel abandoned by everyone, including the Government. Whll the

Prime Minister pledges government to do much more to help carers in my

constituency and across the country? I take this opportunity to pay

tribute to carers across thd country for the selfless work they do and be

immense amount of money thex save taxpayers every year. Above all for

the love and commitment thex give to the people they are caring for. What

we have done is try to help by increasing the number of carers

breaks because many carers save that the one thing they need to go one

caring is an occasional bre`k. It is time away from their care and

responsibilities. We continte to work on those things to help all our

carers. The largest single source of employment and wealth in my

constituency is the financi`l services market. Does the Prime

Minister agree with me that the opportunity to continue trading

freely in a 500 million single market, a computer 's cabindt market

union is an unparalleled and optimistic opportunity from my

constituents and one that no central businessman would ever turn his back

on. I think my honourable friend makes an important point. It is

worth understanding exactly what this single market means. It means

that they financial services company based on the UK effectively has a

passport to trade in 27 of dight Yukon entries. If we are to leave,

if we leave the single markdt we lose that passport right. -,

European countries. It would mean that we have to relocate at least

some of the staff into another European country. HSBC would have to

scrap a thousand jobs, another company would have to scrap 400

jobs. Lawyers have said that many insurance jobs are under threat

This is a concrete example of why the single market matters. This

doesn't just affect his constituency. Two thirds of the jobs

in financial services are ottside of London and this accounts for 7% of

the economy. When experts w`rn of effects on jobs and growth `nd

livelihoods in a country thhs is a classic example of why the right to

make that case. Does the Prhme Minister agree with me that a vote

to leave on the 23rd of Jund would be a hammer blow for the Brhtish

Steel industry? When he agrded to meet with me in order to discuss the

decisions being made in the context of the sale process, imminent

decisions that will have a huge impact on thousands of jobs in my

constituency and across the country? I am working closely with the

honourable gentleman to do everything we can to secure a future

for Tata steel. This process is progressing and that is encouraging.

Yes, I think for stew we ard better off inside the European Union

because together, as one of 28 countries, we are far better able to

stand up to the Chinese or hndeed the Americans over dumped steel

Where we put in place those dumping tariffs you can see 95, 90 8%

reductions in the quantity of Chinese steel in those categories

being imported into the EU. We face a difficult decision but we are

definitely better off as part of the organisation fighting for British

Steel worker's jobs. Will the Prime Minister address an issue that the

remaining camp as French, that I'll present immigration authority cannot

control numbers coming into the EU to the benefit of our public

services, but actually discriminates against the rest of the world

outside the EU. Having spent my evening yesterday with Mr F`rage I'm

confused about what it is b`d to leave camp actually want whdn it

comes to immigration. I thotght they wanted less immigration, but now

they seem to want more immigration from outside the EU. My view is that

we should restrict welfare hn the way that we have negotiated so that

you have to work your full four years before you get full access to

the welfare system. No more something for nothing, people pay in

before they get out. Then wd should focus on proper controls for

migration from outside the DU, which we have made progress on in recent

years. That is the right answer The alternative, an Australian point

system, Australia have twicd as much immigration per head as we have in

the UK. That is not the right answer for Britain. As he reaches the end

of his time in office! Does he reflect that his worst mist`ke was a

catastrophe in Libya, what hs the Prime Minister's worst moment in

office? The time to reflect as when you are close to your time of office

so it doesn't apply! Order! Order! I'm sure the honourable ladx is

delighted to receive such a team of just chain.

Thank you, Mr Speaker. I was delighted to welcome the Prhme

Minister to my constituency last week to visit our largest local

employer, we heard that havhng a strong economy is vital for the

ongoing success of Britain's oldest brewery. Does my right honotrable

friend agree that leaving the EU would be an union would jeopardise

that economy and British businesses, British jobs and British

livelihoods? My honourable friend is right, I think it is the oldest

brewery in the country, thex couldn't have been clearer `bout

wanting to stay in a reformdd European Union because they want a

strong economy, they recognhse that it is in our interests. She and I

very much enjoyed a pint of Spitfire early in the morning. The things we

have to do to win this wintdr! But we are committed to carrying it

through. Given the number of people who will

be travelling from all parts of the United Kingdom, including Scotland,

to the euros next week we wdlcome everybody. Given Leicester's success

in the premiership, Northern Ireland at 150 21 as certain to win, will he

Prime Minister insurer and ` serious note, given the security threat that

the British Embassy and consulate staff are geared up, resourced and

staffed to deal with problels that arise. I am grateful to the right

honourable member for raising this issue. This is one occasion when the

whole house will want all the home nations to stay in Europe as long as

possible! Come on! First gale is England Russia, and I will be

watching very carefully to check we get strong support. The honourable

gentleman makes a good point that this is a very big security

undertaking, 500,000 people are planning to leave the United Kingdom

to go to this tournament. Wd have set out very clear travel advice

because people do need to know, obviously, there is a significant

terrorist threat in France today. And there is a potential threat to

this tournament. We set out very clearly the threat level in France

is critical. The threat levdl for the tournament is severe. Pdople

need to know that. The French security operation is enormous. We

are providing additional counterterrorism and public order

support to the French including deployment of additional police on

trains into France, UK borddr force out branch checks and helping with

sniffer dogs and other areas that the French ask us for. We w`nt to

see a great celebration of Duropean football, I wish all the whole

nations well, I think it's brilliant that Northern Ireland have lade it

to this tournament and I know, and of course, Wales and England. And I

look forward to watching sole fantastic football.

Order!