Browse content similar to 29/09/2011. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
After one of the hottest autumn days since the 1890s, | 2:37:42 | 2:37:46 | |
no respite for our panel in this hot studio in Liverpool. | 2:37:46 | 2:37:50 | |
Welcome to Question Time. | 2:37:50 | 2:37:52 | |
On the panel, housing minister, Grant Shapps, | 2:37:59 | 2:38:03 | |
shadow communities secretary, Caroline Flint, | 2:38:03 | 2:38:06 | |
president of the Liberal Democrats, Tim Farron, | 2:38:06 | 2:38:08 | |
tipped as a possible future leader of the party. | 2:38:08 | 2:38:11 | |
Broadcaster and author, Janet Street-Porter, | 2:38:11 | 2:38:14 | |
and the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator, Peter Oborne. | 2:38:14 | 2:38:18 | |
APPLAUSE | 2:38:18 | 2:38:23 | |
Thank you very much. The first question is from Brian Berry. | 2:38:32 | 2:38:35 | |
Should the speed limit on our motorways be increased to 80mph, | 2:38:35 | 2:38:39 | |
or scrapped altogether? | 2:38:39 | 2:38:41 | |
This government is putting this forward for consultation, | 2:38:41 | 2:38:44 | |
and it's clear the government intends to go ahead. | 2:38:44 | 2:38:46 | |
Caroline Flint, do you approve, 80mph? | 2:38:46 | 2:38:49 | |
Erm, I think if there's evidence that suggests it wouldn't do harm | 2:38:49 | 2:38:54 | |
and it can be enforced, then I think it's worth having a look at. | 2:38:54 | 2:39:00 | |
The only thing I would say, David, | 2:39:00 | 2:39:02 | |
is you have to take into account, if you go up from 70mph up to 80mph, | 2:39:02 | 2:39:07 | |
that's 20% more fuel that will be used. | 2:39:07 | 2:39:11 | |
So there's issues about the cost for the person driving the car. | 2:39:11 | 2:39:15 | |
But everybody would get to work sooner, | 2:39:15 | 2:39:17 | |
because you go faster and get there quicker. | 2:39:17 | 2:39:21 | |
But I'm talking about how much fuel you use. | 2:39:21 | 2:39:24 | |
What worries me about this, | 2:39:24 | 2:39:26 | |
and I'm not saying it shouldn't happen, | 2:39:26 | 2:39:28 | |
but we've seen decisions made, for example, | 2:39:28 | 2:39:32 | |
not fund speed cameras, reducing safety grants available, | 2:39:32 | 2:39:36 | |
cut down on police, which will mean motorway police. | 2:39:36 | 2:39:40 | |
These are important factors about how we manage our roads. | 2:39:40 | 2:39:43 | |
Who's to say that if it's 80, people don't go up to 90? | 2:39:43 | 2:39:47 | |
Well, they go 80 when it's 70. | 2:39:47 | 2:39:48 | |
The point is that as soon as you push it up, | 2:39:48 | 2:39:51 | |
-it might go up another level. -Are you for or against? | 2:39:51 | 2:39:54 | |
I would like to see the evidence from the government. | 2:39:54 | 2:39:57 | |
I think there are some issues. | 2:39:57 | 2:39:59 | |
the targets to try to reduce deaths by car accident have been scrapped, | 2:39:59 | 2:40:04 | |
and with that some of the safety grants on road safety, | 2:40:04 | 2:40:07 | |
and potential cuts in motorway police to manage the roads. | 2:40:07 | 2:40:11 | |
That should worry us | 2:40:11 | 2:40:12 | |
if we're going to start raising the speed on motorways. | 2:40:12 | 2:40:15 | |
OK. Grant Shapps. | 2:40:15 | 2:40:18 | |
There is an argument for having another look at this. | 2:40:18 | 2:40:21 | |
I am less sceptical about consultations | 2:40:21 | 2:40:23 | |
since I've been in government and seen that evidence does come in | 2:40:23 | 2:40:26 | |
and it's usually very carefully looked at. | 2:40:26 | 2:40:28 | |
As a minister, I take great care to study | 2:40:28 | 2:40:30 | |
what people come back with in consultations. | 2:40:30 | 2:40:33 | |
I think it is a genuine question. I think there are benefits. | 2:40:33 | 2:40:36 | |
One thing which has happened, if you think back to the '60s and '70s, | 2:40:36 | 2:40:40 | |
the cars that were being driven around at the time, | 2:40:40 | 2:40:43 | |
they wouldn't have had the brake systems that exist now, | 2:40:43 | 2:40:46 | |
so I think there is a very good argument | 2:40:46 | 2:40:49 | |
that actually better technology allows a slightly faster speed. | 2:40:49 | 2:40:51 | |
For people who've driven on the Continent, | 2:40:51 | 2:40:53 | |
and I don't just mean the autobahn in Germany, | 2:40:53 | 2:40:56 | |
but almost anywhere on the Continent, | 2:40:56 | 2:40:59 | |
it will tend to be I think 140kph, about 80mph. | 2:40:59 | 2:41:04 | |
It seems to be the new standard, so I think it's worth looking at. | 2:41:04 | 2:41:07 | |
Janet Street-Porter, you ride a bicycle, or on your feet, if you can. | 2:41:07 | 2:41:11 | |
I like walking and I think | 2:41:11 | 2:41:12 | |
there's too much aggressive driving on motorways as it is. | 2:41:12 | 2:41:16 | |
I'm not very happy about this. | 2:41:16 | 2:41:19 | |
Most people on motorways, as you said earlier, with a 70mph limit, | 2:41:19 | 2:41:23 | |
do 80, and if it's 80mph, they'll be doing 90. | 2:41:23 | 2:41:28 | |
Driving on a motorway, I find programmes like Top Gear | 2:41:28 | 2:41:32 | |
have made people think the motorway is an official race track. | 2:41:32 | 2:41:38 | |
I think your lot, | 2:41:38 | 2:41:39 | |
coming up with this increasing the motorway speed limit, | 2:41:39 | 2:41:43 | |
it's a crowd-pleasing, cheap thing to do. | 2:41:43 | 2:41:47 | |
You're not doing that well in the opinion polls, | 2:41:47 | 2:41:49 | |
you've clawed back a bit this week, and this is a cheap vote-winner. | 2:41:49 | 2:41:52 | |
Everybody wants to be Jeremy Clarkson! | 2:41:52 | 2:41:54 | |
APPLAUSE | 2:41:54 | 2:41:57 | |
No, David, men want to be Jeremy Clarkson. | 2:41:58 | 2:42:02 | |
I don't think you'll find one woman in this audience | 2:42:02 | 2:42:05 | |
who wants a backside like that. | 2:42:05 | 2:42:07 | |
Don't be personal, but I don't... | 2:42:09 | 2:42:11 | |
The man there. | 2:42:11 | 2:42:13 | |
Personally for me, I do a lot of motorway driving. | 2:42:13 | 2:42:16 | |
I wouldn't mind it going up to 80, but the problem for me is | 2:42:16 | 2:42:20 | |
future generations, carbon footprint and stuff, | 2:42:20 | 2:42:24 | |
I think it would affect them more. | 2:42:24 | 2:42:25 | |
But to get the carbon footprint right you have to go to 54 mph, | 2:42:25 | 2:42:29 | |
is that right, Tim Farron? You're a liberal! | 2:42:29 | 2:42:33 | |
And we know about these things, yes. | 2:42:33 | 2:42:35 | |
What do you think about the 80mph limit? | 2:42:35 | 2:42:37 | |
It's fine to have a consultation. | 2:42:37 | 2:42:39 | |
As long as it is looked at in every direction. | 2:42:39 | 2:42:42 | |
Points have been raised as to why it's not a good idea, | 2:42:42 | 2:42:44 | |
and I agree with them. | 2:42:44 | 2:42:46 | |
There are three considerations. One, the impact on the environment. | 2:42:46 | 2:42:50 | |
The faster you go, the worse for the environment. | 2:42:50 | 2:42:53 | |
Second, the faster you go the more likely people are to have accidents, | 2:42:53 | 2:42:56 | |
irrespective of the fact that cars are safer these days. | 2:42:56 | 2:43:00 | |
There are more of them, too. And the third thing is the economy, | 2:43:00 | 2:43:04 | |
will people getting to destinations quicker be better for the economy? | 2:43:04 | 2:43:07 | |
Maybe. But anybody who travels on the M6 can tell you | 2:43:07 | 2:43:11 | |
that if you get up to 40 you're doing well! | 2:43:11 | 2:43:14 | |
Have the consultation, but we should look at the evidence | 2:43:14 | 2:43:17 | |
and decide to stick as we are if that's how it concludes. | 2:43:17 | 2:43:20 | |
The man in the striped shirt. | 2:43:20 | 2:43:22 | |
Equally, the problem is people driving too slowly on motorways, | 2:43:22 | 2:43:26 | |
which is just as dangerous because you get massive congestion. | 2:43:26 | 2:43:29 | |
People drive in the middle lane at 50 and everybody gets irate. | 2:43:29 | 2:43:33 | |
I think that would also help. | 2:43:33 | 2:43:36 | |
You think they should be made to watch Top Gear | 2:43:36 | 2:43:38 | |
and learn how to drive on the motorway? | 2:43:38 | 2:43:40 | |
There should be a minimum speed the police can enforce, | 2:43:40 | 2:43:43 | |
because it is equally as dangerous, I think. | 2:43:43 | 2:43:47 | |
We haven't got any women's hands up. Yes. | 2:43:47 | 2:43:50 | |
The woman at the very back, | 2:43:50 | 2:43:51 | |
and then I'll come to you in the second row from the back. | 2:43:51 | 2:43:54 | |
With regards to the adverts shown on television, where they show that | 2:43:54 | 2:43:59 | |
if you're going 40mph compared to 30, the impact | 2:43:59 | 2:44:02 | |
of a child being dragged so much further down the street, | 2:44:02 | 2:44:05 | |
surely if you're going down the motorway, | 2:44:05 | 2:44:08 | |
someone doesn't have a seatbelt on, | 2:44:08 | 2:44:10 | |
they'll go further through the window | 2:44:10 | 2:44:12 | |
and have far more fatalities. | 2:44:12 | 2:44:14 | |
You would be against the change? Peter Oborne, are you for or against? | 2:44:14 | 2:44:17 | |
I'm very strongly in favour of this change to 80mph. | 2:44:17 | 2:44:22 | |
One of the good things which this government is doing | 2:44:22 | 2:44:25 | |
is getting rid of unnecessary laws and regulations. | 2:44:25 | 2:44:30 | |
And there's a bigger point here as well. | 2:44:30 | 2:44:32 | |
It's very important that laws should be treated with respect | 2:44:32 | 2:44:35 | |
when we have them. | 2:44:35 | 2:44:36 | |
The fact is, none of the people round this panel, | 2:44:36 | 2:44:38 | |
and I suspect very few people in the audience, | 2:44:38 | 2:44:42 | |
actually ever take any notice | 2:44:42 | 2:44:43 | |
when there's a clear run on the motorway of that 70mph limit. | 2:44:43 | 2:44:47 | |
Let's have a limit which people respect, | 2:44:47 | 2:44:50 | |
and let's get rid of more laws which people simply don't observe, | 2:44:50 | 2:44:54 | |
like the ludicrous hunting ban, for instance. Let's get rid of that. | 2:44:54 | 2:44:58 | |
APPLAUSE | 2:44:58 | 2:45:00 | |
The woman there. | 2:45:04 | 2:45:07 | |
The woman there, yes, you. | 2:45:07 | 2:45:09 | |
Will the government's consultation include measuring how much | 2:45:09 | 2:45:13 | |
extra fuel tax they might rake in from us drivers? | 2:45:13 | 2:45:17 | |
-You think there's a hidden agenda? -Definitely. | 2:45:17 | 2:45:20 | |
The more fuel, the more the government gets. | 2:45:20 | 2:45:23 | |
It's like the more you smoke, and they try to stop you. | 2:45:23 | 2:45:26 | |
That's a new conspiracy theory, like Janet's one | 2:45:26 | 2:45:28 | |
about men all watching Top Gear and wanting to be Jeremy Clarkson, | 2:45:28 | 2:45:32 | |
which I don't and don't, by the way. | 2:45:32 | 2:45:34 | |
How do you know, if you don't watch it? | 2:45:34 | 2:45:36 | |
I don't watch it and I don't want to be him. | 2:45:36 | 2:45:39 | |
You don't know you don't want to be Jeremy Clarkson | 2:45:39 | 2:45:42 | |
-if you don't watch it. -Might be getting pedantic, | 2:45:42 | 2:45:44 | |
but the point it, | 2:45:44 | 2:45:46 | |
there's probably no-one in this audience at some point | 2:45:46 | 2:45:50 | |
who hasn't been on an open piece of motorway... | 2:45:50 | 2:45:53 | |
No-one's talking about roads where there's a kid walking by, | 2:45:53 | 2:45:56 | |
people should be wearing seatbelts, but no-one can sit here today | 2:45:56 | 2:46:00 | |
and say there's never been an open bit of road | 2:46:00 | 2:46:03 | |
and you've wondered why the speed limit is set at 70, | 2:46:03 | 2:46:07 | |
when there would be no difficulty in driving a bit faster. | 2:46:07 | 2:46:11 | |
I think it's worth looking at, | 2:46:11 | 2:46:13 | |
and if it enables people to get to place a bit faster... | 2:46:13 | 2:46:16 | |
That is a completely spurious argument, about as spurious | 2:46:16 | 2:46:20 | |
as your high-speed rail up the middle of England | 2:46:20 | 2:46:23 | |
vandalising the whole of the centre of the country | 2:46:23 | 2:46:26 | |
to get people to Birmingham 20 minutes faster. | 2:46:26 | 2:46:28 | |
Why is getting anywhere ten minutes faster so desirable? | 2:46:28 | 2:46:33 | |
Of all the personal freedoms you could give me, | 2:46:33 | 2:46:36 | |
giving me the freedom to get somewhere ten minutes faster | 2:46:36 | 2:46:39 | |
going 80mph is ludicrous. | 2:46:39 | 2:46:41 | |
No doubt people will have made these arguments | 2:46:41 | 2:46:43 | |
when instead of horse-drawn carriage, | 2:46:43 | 2:46:45 | |
they decided to build railways in the first place. | 2:46:45 | 2:46:48 | |
I think this is an absolutely Dickensian argument. | 2:46:48 | 2:46:52 | |
Going faster doesn't mean you're more modern. | 2:46:52 | 2:46:55 | |
In future, the people with the most money will be going the slowest. | 2:46:55 | 2:46:59 | |
We'll see over time. | 2:46:59 | 2:47:03 | |
APPLAUSE | 2:47:03 | 2:47:05 | |
You in the brown pullover. | 2:47:08 | 2:47:10 | |
Peter said that raising the limit to 80 | 2:47:10 | 2:47:13 | |
would make people respect the speed limit more. | 2:47:13 | 2:47:16 | |
I'm in favour of the change, | 2:47:16 | 2:47:17 | |
but has he seen any evidence | 2:47:17 | 2:47:19 | |
that people would stick to that speed limit? | 2:47:19 | 2:47:22 | |
What I was saying was, | 2:47:22 | 2:47:23 | |
let's not have a limit which nobody in this country observes. | 2:47:23 | 2:47:27 | |
Let's have a limit which people do observe. | 2:47:27 | 2:47:29 | |
If you have a limit of 80mph which people observed, | 2:47:29 | 2:47:33 | |
there will be respect for the law. | 2:47:33 | 2:47:35 | |
The problem is that we have politicians who invent laws | 2:47:35 | 2:47:38 | |
and create laws which are never meant to be observed. | 2:47:38 | 2:47:42 | |
-Let's have respect for that law. -But why would they follow it? | 2:47:42 | 2:47:44 | |
What is the evidence that 10mph more will make a difference? | 2:47:44 | 2:47:48 | |
I'm suggesting that when you do have a sensible speed limit, | 2:47:48 | 2:47:52 | |
you do enforce it seriously. | 2:47:52 | 2:47:54 | |
If you raise the speed limit to 80, the question is | 2:47:54 | 2:47:56 | |
looking at the evidence about the impact on safety | 2:47:56 | 2:47:59 | |
and how it will be enforced. I think the point the young man's making | 2:47:59 | 2:48:02 | |
is that people go over 70 | 2:48:02 | 2:48:04 | |
and we know that, but they'll probably go within a range of 70-75. | 2:48:04 | 2:48:09 | |
If you start bumping it up, | 2:48:09 | 2:48:11 | |
will people bump up the norm for going over the speed limit? | 2:48:11 | 2:48:14 | |
I'm not advocating going over the speed limit, | 2:48:14 | 2:48:16 | |
but I'm talking about human behaviour. | 2:48:16 | 2:48:18 | |
It's like a Marx Brothers movie. | 2:48:18 | 2:48:20 | |
Make it 80, then 90, then 100. | 2:48:20 | 2:48:23 | |
It's like drinking The minute you tell people "You're only supposed | 2:48:23 | 2:48:27 | |
"to drink 14 or 21 units", ha, ha, ha. How many of us stick to that? | 2:48:27 | 2:48:30 | |
We don't, as a nation, stick to rules, do we? | 2:48:30 | 2:48:34 | |
My postbag is more full of people | 2:48:34 | 2:48:36 | |
concerned about people driving too fast than not driving fast enough. | 2:48:36 | 2:48:40 | |
At the bottom end, people in residential areas, rural Cumbria, | 2:48:40 | 2:48:45 | |
are concerned that the speed limit of 30 should come down to 20. | 2:48:45 | 2:48:49 | |
The police will tell you they don't have the resources to enforce it, | 2:48:49 | 2:48:52 | |
but those limits do enforce themselves. | 2:48:52 | 2:48:54 | |
If it's at 30, people drive at 38. | 2:48:54 | 2:48:57 | |
-If it's 20, they drive at 28. -That's because of the fining system. | 2:48:57 | 2:49:01 | |
You can use cameras now on average speeds, which you couldn't before. | 2:49:01 | 2:49:06 | |
-You're ending the funding of speed cameras. -The woman there? | 2:49:06 | 2:49:10 | |
Isn't this just another example of another policy proposal | 2:49:10 | 2:49:14 | |
that is for the business community who want to get their trucks there | 2:49:14 | 2:49:18 | |
20 minutes early, | 2:49:18 | 2:49:19 | |
instead of something that would benefit normal people more, | 2:49:19 | 2:49:23 | |
and it is also a gimmick, a crowd-pleasing gimmick, | 2:49:23 | 2:49:26 | |
as Janet said. | 2:49:26 | 2:49:27 | |
Isn't that just another example of a time-wasting policy? | 2:49:27 | 2:49:31 | |
It's not pleasing you, and it's not pleasing a lot of people here. | 2:49:31 | 2:49:35 | |
Perhaps one of the things to consult about | 2:49:35 | 2:49:37 | |
is whether it's a crowd-pleasing gimmick. | 2:49:37 | 2:49:39 | |
The idea that you should never look at laws | 2:49:39 | 2:49:42 | |
that were put in place in the '60s and '70s is crazy. | 2:49:42 | 2:49:44 | |
Just because it benefits businesses and gets haulage companies | 2:49:44 | 2:49:49 | |
and all of us around faster, the idea that it doesn't | 2:49:49 | 2:49:51 | |
have a knock-on effect on jobs is of course not true as well. | 2:49:51 | 2:49:54 | |
Join in this debate if you want: | 2:49:54 | 2:49:56 | |
We go now to a question from Gwyneth Evans. | 2:50:05 | 2:50:07 | |
Is the eurozone a burning building with no exits? | 2:50:07 | 2:50:11 | |
This is a quote from William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, | 2:50:11 | 2:50:14 | |
who said that's what he thought it was | 2:50:14 | 2:50:17 | |
and that powers should be returned from Europe and the rest of it. | 2:50:17 | 2:50:21 | |
Tim Farron, are you a supporter of the eurozone, | 2:50:21 | 2:50:24 | |
or is it a burning building, as your Foreign Secretary said? | 2:50:24 | 2:50:27 | |
I would say it's a building on fire, | 2:50:27 | 2:50:31 | |
and the number of exits are limited. | 2:50:31 | 2:50:33 | |
The fact that they are in the euro has limited the number of exits. | 2:50:33 | 2:50:38 | |
I think William Hague is saying that, I guess to make the point | 2:50:38 | 2:50:42 | |
that he was right as Tory leader | 2:50:42 | 2:50:44 | |
to say we shouldn't have gone into the euro. | 2:50:44 | 2:50:46 | |
In retrospect, you can't argue with that. | 2:50:46 | 2:50:49 | |
Do you think it was the right decision? | 2:50:49 | 2:50:51 | |
Absolutely. Is the house on fire? Yes. Did the euro set it on fire? | 2:50:51 | 2:50:57 | |
No, it didn't. The fact | 2:50:57 | 2:50:58 | |
that governments have overspent and banks have overlent | 2:50:58 | 2:51:01 | |
is the reason for fire across the world. The US doesn't have the euro. | 2:51:01 | 2:51:05 | |
We don't have the euro, | 2:51:05 | 2:51:06 | |
and we have huge, crippling financial problems that need to be tackled. | 2:51:06 | 2:51:11 | |
We're in north-west England. | 2:51:11 | 2:51:13 | |
We have an affinity with Ireland, | 2:51:13 | 2:51:14 | |
culturally and economically. The talk is of Greece, | 2:51:14 | 2:51:17 | |
but don't forget our friends and cousins over the water here. | 2:51:17 | 2:51:20 | |
We need to protect them, for our economy. | 2:51:20 | 2:51:23 | |
There are thousands of jobs in the north-west | 2:51:23 | 2:51:25 | |
that depend on the eurozone not going down. It's vital. | 2:51:25 | 2:51:29 | |
Peter Oborne. | 2:51:29 | 2:51:32 | |
I so agree that we have to care about our cousins in Ireland. | 2:51:32 | 2:51:36 | |
And the way the Irish will recover is by getting out of the euro. | 2:51:36 | 2:51:41 | |
If Ireland got out of the euro, | 2:51:41 | 2:51:44 | |
their economy would start to recover strongly tomorrow afternoon. | 2:51:44 | 2:51:47 | |
The same applies to Greece. | 2:51:47 | 2:51:49 | |
If they got out of the euro and went back to the drachma, | 2:51:49 | 2:51:54 | |
their economy would start to recover tomorrow afternoon. | 2:51:54 | 2:51:57 | |
I'm not going to let off Tim Farron lightly. | 2:51:57 | 2:52:00 | |
His party pushed for this country to go into the euro. | 2:52:00 | 2:52:05 | |
If we had taken his advice, | 2:52:05 | 2:52:07 | |
we would now be in the same degraded state | 2:52:07 | 2:52:10 | |
as Portugal, as Spain, | 2:52:10 | 2:52:14 | |
as Italy. The Chief Secretary to the Treasury is Danny Alexander, | 2:52:14 | 2:52:19 | |
the economic ignoramus who tried to drive us into the euro. | 2:52:19 | 2:52:24 | |
He headed the campaign for the euro for five full years, | 2:52:24 | 2:52:27 | |
and then at the Lib Dem conference two weeks ago, he had the audacity | 2:52:27 | 2:52:31 | |
to say that us Euro-sceptics were enemies of growth. | 2:52:31 | 2:52:35 | |
If he had had his way, there wouldn't be growth in this country. | 2:52:35 | 2:52:38 | |
This is history, Peter. | 2:52:38 | 2:52:40 | |
-I wanted to remind everybody. -But we didn't go into the euro. | 2:52:40 | 2:52:44 | |
I know you have it in for those who thought we should, | 2:52:44 | 2:52:47 | |
but they didn't win. | 2:52:47 | 2:52:49 | |
Your lot won the argument. | 2:52:49 | 2:52:51 | |
We have to thank the good sense of the British people, actually, | 2:52:51 | 2:52:56 | |
for not taking us in at the end of the day, | 2:52:56 | 2:53:00 | |
because Tony Blair didn't dare to do it. | 2:53:00 | 2:53:02 | |
But the truth now is | 2:53:02 | 2:53:05 | |
that the solution to this problem for countries like Ireland | 2:53:05 | 2:53:09 | |
and Greece is to get out of the euro as soon as they possibly can. | 2:53:09 | 2:53:13 | |
The woman in the second row? | 2:53:13 | 2:53:15 | |
I think we should cut all ties with the European Union altogether. | 2:53:15 | 2:53:19 | |
It's ruined our economy. | 2:53:19 | 2:53:21 | |
I think that the British people should have the right to vote | 2:53:21 | 2:53:24 | |
whether we want it or not. | 2:53:24 | 2:53:26 | |
Like the Liberal Democrats, they wanted a referendum to see | 2:53:26 | 2:53:30 | |
if they could get in in 2015. You've got no chance. | 2:53:30 | 2:53:33 | |
Where's our vote for the European Union? | 2:53:33 | 2:53:37 | |
Grant Shapps, you should get out altogether? | 2:53:37 | 2:53:40 | |
The Foreign Secretary said you should repatriate powers. | 2:53:40 | 2:53:43 | |
We are an island. we should have the right | 2:53:43 | 2:53:46 | |
whether we want to be in. | 2:53:46 | 2:53:47 | |
Ask the British people that pay into the system. | 2:53:47 | 2:53:50 | |
-Grant Shapps? -Our coalition partners don't believe we should get out. | 2:53:50 | 2:53:53 | |
I heard Tim say it would be wrong for us to put that on the table. | 2:53:53 | 2:53:58 | |
Does that mean you think we should get out? | 2:53:58 | 2:54:01 | |
I think we should have powers repatriated. | 2:54:01 | 2:54:04 | |
I can see that whilst we're in a coalition | 2:54:04 | 2:54:06 | |
during this period of trying to stop our country being in that building | 2:54:06 | 2:54:10 | |
as well, it's important to concentrate on | 2:54:10 | 2:54:13 | |
dealing with our own debt. And we're doing that. | 2:54:13 | 2:54:16 | |
It's one of the reasons we're able | 2:54:16 | 2:54:18 | |
to borrow at historically low levels of interest rates | 2:54:18 | 2:54:21 | |
whilst in many places in Europe, it's become incredibly expensive. | 2:54:21 | 2:54:25 | |
William Hague is right to say that the building is on fire. | 2:54:25 | 2:54:30 | |
I think there is an opportunity that the European leaders have | 2:54:30 | 2:54:33 | |
to douse those flames, but they have to move | 2:54:33 | 2:54:36 | |
very quick. There are 17 countries in the euro | 2:54:36 | 2:54:39 | |
who need to put these plans through. We saw the Germans take that step. | 2:54:39 | 2:54:43 | |
These are just the plans from June or July. | 2:54:43 | 2:54:45 | |
They need to get ahead of the curve. | 2:54:45 | 2:54:47 | |
They're trying to catch up all the time. | 2:54:47 | 2:54:49 | |
They need to be ahead of this. | 2:54:49 | 2:54:50 | |
They need to deal with the debt crisis. | 2:54:50 | 2:54:54 | |
You sound more optimistic than William Hague, | 2:54:54 | 2:54:58 | |
because the interpretation | 2:54:58 | 2:54:59 | |
of a burning building with no exits is disastrous. You don't get out. | 2:54:59 | 2:55:03 | |
That's the result of me reading the rest of his interview. | 2:55:03 | 2:55:06 | |
"I once said it was like a burning building". | 2:55:06 | 2:55:08 | |
"..And I was right". What's different about the interview? | 2:55:08 | 2:55:13 | |
It looks like the doors are blocked, the windows are jammed | 2:55:13 | 2:55:17 | |
and it's difficult to get out. We don't have to end up | 2:55:17 | 2:55:20 | |
in that situation. If the European economy is in the euro, | 2:55:20 | 2:55:23 | |
it's their responsibility to resolve, get together, | 2:55:23 | 2:55:26 | |
and have the political leadership and will to sort it out. | 2:55:26 | 2:55:30 | |
Then it can be done. The trouble is, | 2:55:30 | 2:55:32 | |
they're behind the curve at every stage at the moment. | 2:55:32 | 2:55:34 | |
They've got a window of opportunity until the Cannes summit | 2:55:34 | 2:55:38 | |
to get this sorted out. | 2:55:38 | 2:55:39 | |
-The man in the black and white shirt? -I'm listening to the panel, | 2:55:39 | 2:55:43 | |
and I'm perplexed because everyone's on about the euro. | 2:55:43 | 2:55:47 | |
At the end of the day, | 2:55:47 | 2:55:50 | |
the people sat in this room will be bailing this country out. | 2:55:50 | 2:55:52 | |
If Greece defaults on its loan, | 2:55:52 | 2:55:57 | |
you are going to come to this country and say | 2:55:57 | 2:56:00 | |
"We need money because we're skint", in a nutshell. | 2:56:00 | 2:56:03 | |
If Ireland defaults on its loan, | 2:56:03 | 2:56:06 | |
how is Mr Osborne going to get his seven billion euro loan | 2:56:06 | 2:56:09 | |
back from Ireland? | 2:56:09 | 2:56:11 | |
I think it's a valid point and it worries a lot of people. | 2:56:11 | 2:56:16 | |
-We're not part of the European Stability Fund. -We pay into it. | 2:56:16 | 2:56:20 | |
-No, we pay into the IMF fund. -But it's going to cost us something? | 2:56:20 | 2:56:25 | |
Of course it will. If those economies go to the wall, | 2:56:25 | 2:56:29 | |
if there are problems in Europe, | 2:56:29 | 2:56:31 | |
one of our biggest markets, of course that's a problem for us. | 2:56:31 | 2:56:34 | |
You mention the Ireland money, the seven billion or so. | 2:56:34 | 2:56:37 | |
I think it hasn't been called on as yet, but Ireland and Britain | 2:56:37 | 2:56:40 | |
have a more interconnected economy | 2:56:40 | 2:56:42 | |
than many others, and certainly than we do with Greece. | 2:56:42 | 2:56:45 | |
-The woman on the right? -Is it possible to be a Eurosceptic | 2:56:45 | 2:56:48 | |
and pro-Europe by looking at the European Union | 2:56:48 | 2:56:53 | |
as a potential Commonwealth, | 2:56:53 | 2:56:54 | |
more loosely constructed than the European Union, | 2:56:54 | 2:56:57 | |
but as a Commonwealth reflective | 2:56:57 | 2:56:59 | |
of why our own Commonwealth survives and why it's so strong. | 2:56:59 | 2:57:02 | |
Why can't the countries of Europe cooperate, work together, | 2:57:02 | 2:57:06 | |
-but be a more loosely bound Commonwealth? -Caroline Flint? | 2:57:06 | 2:57:11 | |
-I call myself a European pragmatist. -Would you call yourself that? | 2:57:11 | 2:57:15 | |
That's a new expression. | 2:57:15 | 2:57:17 | |
What I mean by that | 2:57:17 | 2:57:19 | |
is that we have such important trading links with Europe. | 2:57:19 | 2:57:23 | |
It's our biggest market. In terms of where we send our goods and the jobs | 2:57:23 | 2:57:27 | |
it creates, a lot of people in this country depend on the jobs | 2:57:27 | 2:57:31 | |
because of those connections with Europe. Difficult at the moment, | 2:57:31 | 2:57:34 | |
because they're not growing | 2:57:34 | 2:57:36 | |
and therefore, we're not receiving our exports. | 2:57:36 | 2:57:38 | |
I'm a pragmatist because I would agree | 2:57:38 | 2:57:42 | |
that there are a number of occasions over the years | 2:57:42 | 2:57:45 | |
where the European Union | 2:57:45 | 2:57:46 | |
has seemed to overcomplicate and involved in matters | 2:57:46 | 2:57:49 | |
which have caused a lot of scepticism in this country. | 2:57:49 | 2:57:52 | |
But the problem for us is this. | 2:57:52 | 2:57:54 | |
One thing I should say - | 2:57:54 | 2:57:55 | |
I'm pleased that when the decisions were being made | 2:57:55 | 2:57:58 | |
under the Labour government, we did choose not to go into the euro. | 2:57:58 | 2:58:02 | |
That was one of the best decisions we made. | 2:58:02 | 2:58:04 | |
It was Gordon Brown's decision. But where we are now is | 2:58:04 | 2:58:07 | |
a bit like the Ireland situation. | 2:58:07 | 2:58:09 | |
If Ireland goes under and other parts of the European Union go under, | 2:58:09 | 2:58:13 | |
we can't sit as an island outside of that. | 2:58:13 | 2:58:16 | |
What I would say to Grant is, there's a G20 summit in November, | 2:58:16 | 2:58:21 | |
which is the most powerful economies in the world. | 2:58:21 | 2:58:24 | |
It's meant to be happening in France. I do believe, | 2:58:24 | 2:58:27 | |
given that we're not party to some of the decisions in Eurozone countries, | 2:58:27 | 2:58:32 | |
that the Prime Minister should say "Bring that summit forward. | 2:58:32 | 2:58:36 | |
"You've said it's an emergency." | 2:58:36 | 2:58:38 | |
By bringing that summit forward, at least we can get ourselves | 2:58:38 | 2:58:41 | |
and others around the table, | 2:58:41 | 2:58:42 | |
including the French, and have discussions in detail | 2:58:42 | 2:58:45 | |
about how to deal with this very difficult situation. | 2:58:45 | 2:58:48 | |
APPLAUSE | 2:58:48 | 2:58:51 | |
The woman at the very back there? Two in from the gangway. | 2:58:51 | 2:58:55 | |
Earlier in the week, a market trader appeared on the BBC, | 2:58:55 | 2:58:58 | |
and he predicted that in 12 months' time, | 2:58:58 | 2:59:01 | |
people's savings would start vanishing from their bank accounts. | 2:59:01 | 2:59:04 | |
Does the panel think there is truth in this statement, and if they do, | 2:59:04 | 2:59:08 | |
what can ordinary people do to prepare for this situation? | 2:59:08 | 2:59:13 | |
That is the kind of worry that people have. Janet Street-Porter, | 2:59:13 | 2:59:17 | |
what do you think about the situation we're in? | 2:59:17 | 2:59:19 | |
I'm glad we're not in the eurozone. | 2:59:19 | 2:59:23 | |
I look at the EU, and when people talk about turning it round, | 2:59:23 | 2:59:27 | |
it's not like a burning building, it's like a tanker or something. | 2:59:27 | 2:59:31 | |
It's like the world's most luxurious tanker. | 2:59:31 | 2:59:34 | |
The one thing about Europe is what it's cost us. | 2:59:34 | 2:59:37 | |
Isn't it fascinating that all these MEPs of all political persuasions, | 2:59:37 | 2:59:42 | |
once they go to Brussels and are signed up to massive expenses, | 2:59:42 | 2:59:47 | |
this gorgeous lifestyle in Brussels, on our money... | 2:59:47 | 2:59:51 | |
APPLAUSE | 2:59:51 | 2:59:53 | |
Suddenly they can see all the justification | 2:59:53 | 2:59:56 | |
for all this legislation that in many, | 2:59:56 | 2:59:59 | |
many ways has had a detrimental effect on Britain. | 2:59:59 | 3:00:04 | |
You go around Europe, and I travel | 3:00:04 | 3:00:06 | |
around Europe a lot, and you see that in other European countries, | 3:00:06 | 3:00:10 | |
how they interpret health and safety and food standards | 3:00:10 | 3:00:14 | |
is completely variable. | 3:00:14 | 3:00:15 | |
It's like a club where everybody has their own set of rules. | 3:00:15 | 3:00:19 | |
So I find it bizarre | 3:00:19 | 3:00:20 | |
that now the eurozone and strong countries like France | 3:00:20 | 3:00:23 | |
and Germany have to bite the bullet and bail out Greece. | 3:00:23 | 3:00:26 | |
I find that incredible as a concept. | 3:00:26 | 3:00:30 | |
Grant Shapps, the point the woman made about savings - | 3:00:30 | 3:00:33 | |
-do you think there is a danger? -I think the answer is, in this country, | 3:00:33 | 3:00:36 | |
through two measures, the danger is less. | 3:00:36 | 3:00:39 | |
One is that the banks were recapitalised, | 3:00:39 | 3:00:41 | |
a measure which was very expensive. They're paying it back. | 3:00:41 | 3:00:44 | |
They need to pay more back, but it's being done. | 3:00:44 | 3:00:48 | |
Secondly, the country itself is paying down its debts. | 3:00:48 | 3:00:51 | |
Whatever you think about the cuts, | 3:00:51 | 3:00:53 | |
no doubt we'll have arguments about those things, but the truth is | 3:00:53 | 3:00:56 | |
that foreign countries are still prepared to lend to Britain. | 3:00:56 | 3:01:00 | |
Because of that, we're much less likely to have those problems. | 3:01:00 | 3:01:03 | |
That's why we're not like Greece, as yourselves and the Liberal Democrats | 3:01:03 | 3:01:08 | |
tried to make out for all these months. | 3:01:08 | 3:01:10 | |
Sorry, now you're changing your tune. | 3:01:10 | 3:01:14 | |
You claimed it was your government that stopped us going into the euro, | 3:01:14 | 3:01:18 | |
which happened under the Major government. | 3:01:18 | 3:01:20 | |
Secondly, we were in the position of Greece, | 3:01:20 | 3:01:23 | |
in fact with a bigger budget deficit | 3:01:23 | 3:01:26 | |
than Greece, until we started to cut it. | 3:01:26 | 3:01:28 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:01:28 | 3:01:34 | |
The burning building is not the eurozone, it's Europe. | 3:01:34 | 3:01:38 | |
Burning £40 million a day, £280 million a week. | 3:01:38 | 3:01:44 | |
What we're going through now, that £280 million wouldn't half go well | 3:01:44 | 3:01:49 | |
on saving hospitals, firefighters' jobs | 3:01:49 | 3:01:53 | |
and saving public sector workers. That's what we should be doing. | 3:01:53 | 3:01:57 | |
I was a supporter of Europe, and now Europe has turned | 3:01:57 | 3:02:00 | |
into the most embarrassing boys' club I've ever seen in my life. | 3:02:00 | 3:02:07 | |
Euro MPs, it's like, "Bang, I've won the lottery again." | 3:02:07 | 3:02:13 | |
It is an absolute embarrassment. | 3:02:13 | 3:02:14 | |
Let's get out of it and put the money in saving British jobs! | 3:02:14 | 3:02:20 | |
CHEERING AND APPLAUSE | 3:02:20 | 3:02:21 | |
Tim Farron, the Foreign Secretary | 3:02:28 | 3:02:30 | |
said that powers should be returned to the UK from Europe, | 3:02:30 | 3:02:32 | |
which is presumably what you would like as a start? | 3:02:32 | 3:02:35 | |
What powers would you like to see returned from Europe to us? | 3:02:35 | 3:02:39 | |
The main power that the UK government can exercise over Europe | 3:02:39 | 3:02:42 | |
is to scrutinise those things that come out of the European Union. | 3:02:42 | 3:02:45 | |
If you go around the Continent, most countries devote time | 3:02:45 | 3:02:49 | |
to scrutinising European legislation. We don't. | 3:02:49 | 3:02:51 | |
We have quite a poisonous relationship with the EU. | 3:02:51 | 3:02:54 | |
The clear sense of hostility to Europe is tangible here tonight. | 3:02:54 | 3:02:58 | |
No powers returned in your view? | 3:02:58 | 3:03:00 | |
The point is making a case for Europe. | 3:03:00 | 3:03:02 | |
But William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, I hate to say, | 3:03:02 | 3:03:05 | |
you are in a coalition, I know you don't like | 3:03:05 | 3:03:08 | |
being in coalition with the Tories, you want a divorce | 3:03:08 | 3:03:12 | |
within three years or whatever, maybe you're thinking | 3:03:12 | 3:03:14 | |
of having an affair with Labour, you know, | 3:03:14 | 3:03:17 | |
but you are in the coalition... | 3:03:17 | 3:03:20 | |
That got too complicated. I think I might need an injunction. | 3:03:20 | 3:03:24 | |
You are in a coalition. | 3:03:24 | 3:03:26 | |
Are you saying that the Liberal Democrats are against that? | 3:03:26 | 3:03:29 | |
The point is this, we have the European Union, | 3:03:29 | 3:03:32 | |
which is clearly not popular in this country. | 3:03:32 | 3:03:35 | |
It is a really difficult situation. | 3:03:35 | 3:03:37 | |
People like myself, | 3:03:37 | 3:03:38 | |
those who are pro-Europe and probably the majority around this table | 3:03:38 | 3:03:42 | |
believe we should remain part of the EU, | 3:03:42 | 3:03:44 | |
but we, if we're not careful, | 3:03:44 | 3:03:46 | |
end up apologists for some of the nonsense coming out of Brussels. | 3:03:46 | 3:03:50 | |
You're right to point to the gravy train. | 3:03:50 | 3:03:52 | |
Some of the ludicrous decisions. | 3:03:52 | 3:03:54 | |
It took Europe 18 years to decide how to define chocolate! | 3:03:54 | 3:03:57 | |
That's an easy hit. Even the Commission knows... | 3:03:57 | 3:04:02 | |
The point I'm making is | 3:04:02 | 3:04:03 | |
we need to aim high and make the argument for Europe. | 3:04:03 | 3:04:07 | |
How about this, next week... | 3:04:07 | 3:04:09 | |
..The MPs are who stealing our money! | 3:04:09 | 3:04:13 | |
-The bottom line... -We don't use it. | 3:04:13 | 3:04:15 | |
How come we've got to... the Euro MPs? | 3:04:15 | 3:04:17 | |
Let me bring in... | 3:04:17 | 3:04:19 | |
I would like to add something to the very eloquent points | 3:04:19 | 3:04:22 | |
being made by the gentleman in the front row. | 3:04:22 | 3:04:25 | |
You agree with him? | 3:04:25 | 3:04:27 | |
I agree with everything he has said, he's brilliant. | 3:04:27 | 3:04:30 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:04:30 | 3:04:33 | |
Should be an MEP. But I want to add something else. | 3:04:36 | 3:04:38 | |
I want to say something else which is very frightening, | 3:04:38 | 3:04:43 | |
very chilling, is the sheer brutality of the European Union. | 3:04:43 | 3:04:46 | |
What they are doing, in order to keep their euro going, | 3:04:46 | 3:04:51 | |
which Tim Farron here supports so much, | 3:04:51 | 3:04:54 | |
they are driving countries to bankruptcy. | 3:04:54 | 3:04:59 | |
They are driving hundreds of millions of people out of work. | 3:04:59 | 3:05:03 | |
There's 46% youth unemployment in Spain | 3:05:03 | 3:05:06 | |
as a direct result of the euro. | 3:05:06 | 3:05:07 | |
In the '80s, when Margaret Thatcher was doing her monetarism | 3:05:07 | 3:05:12 | |
and wasaccused by the left of being an evil, ugly woman | 3:05:12 | 3:05:15 | |
determined to destroy people... | 3:05:15 | 3:05:17 | |
She was! > | 3:05:17 | 3:05:20 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:05:20 | 3:05:21 | |
Whatever... Thatcher, I think she was a great woman, | 3:05:21 | 3:05:25 | |
but whatever she was doing... | 3:05:25 | 3:05:27 | |
BOOING FROM THE AUDIENCE | 3:05:27 | 3:05:29 | |
She hated Liverpool. > | 3:05:30 | 3:05:32 | |
Whatever she was doing, it was compassion itself, | 3:05:32 | 3:05:35 | |
Christian compassion. | 3:05:35 | 3:05:37 | |
She hated Liverpool. > | 3:05:37 | 3:05:39 | |
She hated Liverpool. > | 3:05:39 | 3:05:41 | |
I shouldn't have raised the subject. | 3:05:41 | 3:05:44 | |
-Come on! -I'll move on, then. I give up on that. | 3:05:44 | 3:05:47 | |
Move on, move on! > | 3:05:47 | 3:05:48 | |
But the point is that the brutality of the European Union, | 3:05:48 | 3:05:52 | |
the readiness of the Brussels bureaucrats to obliterate | 3:05:52 | 3:05:58 | |
not just industries, but entire economies | 3:05:58 | 3:06:00 | |
in the name of the dogma of the euro, | 3:06:00 | 3:06:02 | |
that is something which really should frighten us. | 3:06:02 | 3:06:05 | |
Talking about dogma here, next week, | 3:06:05 | 3:06:07 | |
Jim Paice who is the Agricultural Minister, will go to Brussels | 3:06:07 | 3:06:11 | |
and sit around a table with 26 other agricultural ministers | 3:06:11 | 3:06:14 | |
and argue the toss about sheep tagging. | 3:06:14 | 3:06:16 | |
Six or seven of those guys around the table, | 3:06:16 | 3:06:18 | |
22 years ago had nuclear weapons on their soil pointing at this city. | 3:06:18 | 3:06:22 | |
Next week, they're arguing the toss about sheep tagging. | 3:06:22 | 3:06:25 | |
About what? | 3:06:25 | 3:06:26 | |
About sheep tagging. LAUGHTER | 3:06:26 | 3:06:30 | |
Electronic identification for sheep. | 3:06:30 | 3:06:34 | |
Sheep tagging. Thank you. | 3:06:34 | 3:06:36 | |
I think you have made your point. | 3:06:36 | 3:06:39 | |
The point is if all we are doing now with the likes of Hungary | 3:06:39 | 3:06:42 | |
is arguing the toss about how we identify the bovine community, | 3:06:42 | 3:06:46 | |
that is a massive progress from where we were beforehand. | 3:06:46 | 3:06:49 | |
-Thank you, Tim. -Very expensive. | 3:06:49 | 3:06:52 | |
Let's go on. APPLAUSE | 3:06:52 | 3:06:55 | |
I appreciate there is a lot of interest in that question. | 3:06:55 | 3:06:58 | |
A lot of hands up. | 3:06:58 | 3:07:00 | |
I think there might well be in the next one as well. | 3:07:00 | 3:07:03 | |
Which is from Christopher Sinnett, please. | 3:07:03 | 3:07:07 | |
Should families in employment be given preferential treatment | 3:07:07 | 3:07:10 | |
on social housing lists over the unemployed? | 3:07:10 | 3:07:12 | |
This was something Ed Miliband in his speech here in Liverpool, | 3:07:12 | 3:07:16 | |
where the Labour party conference has been going on, | 3:07:16 | 3:07:18 | |
said, "Do we treat the person who contributes to their community | 3:07:18 | 3:07:22 | |
"the same as the person who doesn't? My answer is no." | 3:07:22 | 3:07:25 | |
He was arguing for social housing to give priority to people | 3:07:25 | 3:07:28 | |
who are in employment or gave something back to the community. | 3:07:28 | 3:07:32 | |
Janet Street-Porter, what do you think of that proposal? | 3:07:32 | 3:07:36 | |
Seems to be both a Labour and a Tory... | 3:07:36 | 3:07:38 | |
Yes, I noticed today the Tories are claiming that one as well. | 3:07:38 | 3:07:42 | |
I thought Ed Miliband's speech was bizarre, | 3:07:42 | 3:07:44 | |
because he divides the whole of our society into good and bad people. | 3:07:44 | 3:07:48 | |
I was thinking, right, | 3:07:48 | 3:07:50 | |
so we now have these people in council houses, | 3:07:50 | 3:07:53 | |
good people and bad people, | 3:07:53 | 3:07:54 | |
and the bad people are the people on benefits without a job. | 3:07:54 | 3:07:58 | |
And if you want to get social housing, you need to be in work. | 3:07:58 | 3:08:04 | |
That's ludicrous because we've got at the moment, | 3:08:04 | 3:08:06 | |
nearly a million young people out of work, | 3:08:06 | 3:08:11 | |
so they'll never get on a housing list. | 3:08:11 | 3:08:13 | |
Then I thought about it again and I thought, | 3:08:13 | 3:08:16 | |
there is some merit in creating a points system, | 3:08:16 | 3:08:20 | |
a more modern points system, given the pressure on social housing. | 3:08:20 | 3:08:25 | |
I thought maybe if people did more for their community, | 3:08:25 | 3:08:28 | |
after all, if you want your child to go to a certain school, | 3:08:28 | 3:08:31 | |
you go to church, whatever, you move to an area, | 3:08:31 | 3:08:34 | |
you try to build up points to get your kid | 3:08:34 | 3:08:37 | |
into a church school, for example. | 3:08:37 | 3:08:40 | |
I was thinking, there has been a lot of talk from David Cameron | 3:08:40 | 3:08:45 | |
and from Labour about community spirit and the big society, whatever. | 3:08:45 | 3:08:49 | |
I'm thinking, yes, maybe if the people who help run youth clubs, | 3:08:49 | 3:08:54 | |
help in public libraries, now councils are making | 3:08:54 | 3:08:57 | |
all these cuts and libraries have to be run by volunteers, | 3:08:57 | 3:09:01 | |
if they do social work and do stuff in the community, | 3:09:01 | 3:09:06 | |
that should count as points. | 3:09:06 | 3:09:08 | |
What about when they stop it after they've got the house? | 3:09:08 | 3:09:11 | |
I'm not going to be that judgmental, but I think it's a better structure. | 3:09:11 | 3:09:16 | |
I think this idea of being in paid employment | 3:09:16 | 3:09:19 | |
to get a council house is ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous. | 3:09:19 | 3:09:23 | |
Person in the middle, at the back. | 3:09:23 | 3:09:25 | |
If this is put in place, how are we going to make sure that | 3:09:28 | 3:09:31 | |
people who are physically and mentally unable to contribute | 3:09:31 | 3:09:35 | |
to their community aren't forgotten about and victims of the system? | 3:09:35 | 3:09:39 | |
Caroline Flint. | 3:09:39 | 3:09:40 | |
First of all, what we're not saying is | 3:09:40 | 3:09:43 | |
that only those in work can get access to a council home, | 3:09:43 | 3:09:46 | |
or that run by a housing association. | 3:09:46 | 3:09:48 | |
What we're saying is, that within a community, councils should | 3:09:48 | 3:09:53 | |
take into account a number of things, | 3:09:53 | 3:09:56 | |
for example needs, just like you've expressed there. | 3:09:56 | 3:09:59 | |
But also, we want to make sure that there's offer | 3:09:59 | 3:10:01 | |
for those people on low incomes who are in work. | 3:10:01 | 3:10:04 | |
Unfortunately, at present, in terms of allocating social housing, | 3:10:04 | 3:10:09 | |
it's too often that people have to present themselves in quite | 3:10:09 | 3:10:13 | |
a demeaning way, to show that they are so needy, | 3:10:13 | 3:10:16 | |
so needing help that that's the way you get the points. | 3:10:16 | 3:10:19 | |
I think that's pretty demeaning. | 3:10:19 | 3:10:21 | |
But also it's about how we widen the offer to the community. | 3:10:21 | 3:10:24 | |
For example, if there are some families living in a neighbourhood | 3:10:24 | 3:10:28 | |
and parents or grandparents and they're in a social home, | 3:10:28 | 3:10:32 | |
and they're looking to their kids who are in work getting one, | 3:10:32 | 3:10:36 | |
and a housing estate goes up run by a housing association, | 3:10:36 | 3:10:39 | |
and they know their kids will never get a chance to live there, | 3:10:39 | 3:10:43 | |
that creates, I think, tensions and concerns about fairness. | 3:10:43 | 3:10:47 | |
What we are saying is, we need more homes, that's absolutely the case. | 3:10:47 | 3:10:51 | |
But we want to make sure social housing isn't seen | 3:10:51 | 3:10:54 | |
as a second-choice offer, but a positive choice. | 3:10:54 | 3:10:57 | |
To be honest, it used to be | 3:10:57 | 3:10:59 | |
that actually most people who lived in council houses, | 3:10:59 | 3:11:02 | |
you had teachers, you had plumbers, you had all sorts of people. | 3:11:02 | 3:11:06 | |
We still have that to a certain extent today, | 3:11:06 | 3:11:08 | |
but unfortunately the allocation procedure | 3:11:08 | 3:11:11 | |
has meant a lot of those people never get a look in. | 3:11:11 | 3:11:14 | |
You mean it favours people who can present a case for neediness? | 3:11:14 | 3:11:19 | |
The problem is when a council is trying to decide | 3:11:19 | 3:11:22 | |
and create diverse neighbourhoods, we've got to a stage, | 3:11:22 | 3:11:25 | |
partly because not enough supply, where other people on low incomes | 3:11:25 | 3:11:29 | |
in work never get a look-in. | 3:11:29 | 3:11:31 | |
As Janet said, what Manchester council have been looking at | 3:11:31 | 3:11:35 | |
is those people who make a real contribution to their community, | 3:11:35 | 3:11:39 | |
saying, actually, they will be part of helping make the community strong. | 3:11:39 | 3:11:43 | |
It's saying... It's not about just giving to one group, | 3:11:43 | 3:11:46 | |
but it's taking into account to create a healthy, strong | 3:11:46 | 3:11:49 | |
and actually a good working neighbourhood | 3:11:49 | 3:11:51 | |
is good for a community. | 3:11:51 | 3:11:52 | |
But we need the jobs | 3:11:52 | 3:11:53 | |
and we're not getting them under this government. | 3:11:53 | 3:11:56 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:11:56 | 3:11:57 | |
People who are homeless, living in hostels or whatever, | 3:11:59 | 3:12:01 | |
they find it difficult to find work. | 3:12:01 | 3:12:04 | |
Wouldn't this preferential treatment of those who are employed | 3:12:04 | 3:12:08 | |
condemn people to homelessness and unemployment? | 3:12:08 | 3:12:10 | |
No, no, it wouldn't because it is not about saying either or. | 3:12:10 | 3:12:15 | |
There are still allocations to house people who are homeless, | 3:12:15 | 3:12:18 | |
but actually there's social housing, | 3:12:18 | 3:12:20 | |
but also the private rented sector is also used. | 3:12:20 | 3:12:23 | |
One of the things I said today at conference | 3:12:23 | 3:12:26 | |
is we need to make the private rental sector better. | 3:12:26 | 3:12:28 | |
Those who are unemployed, homeless, living in hostels, | 3:12:28 | 3:12:31 | |
they are effectively condemned to not having housing | 3:12:31 | 3:12:36 | |
because they can't get a job. | 3:12:36 | 3:12:37 | |
But that policy would make it more difficult for someone | 3:12:37 | 3:12:40 | |
to get a job, condemning them to homelessness, condemning them to... | 3:12:40 | 3:12:44 | |
There will be obligations on councils to tackle homelessness and need. | 3:12:44 | 3:12:48 | |
A single parent mother out of work, they will still be counted in. | 3:12:48 | 3:12:51 | |
When you have supply, and we hope to increase supply if re-elected. | 3:12:51 | 3:12:54 | |
We created social homes when we were in, not enough, but we did. | 3:12:54 | 3:12:58 | |
That's something we hope will create a better balance | 3:12:58 | 3:13:01 | |
and a real opportunity for social housing to grow. | 3:13:01 | 3:13:03 | |
It is supposed by... The leader of the council in Liverpool said | 3:13:03 | 3:13:06 | |
he would resign from the Labour Party if this goes through. | 3:13:06 | 3:13:10 | |
You haven't got the party on your side. | 3:13:10 | 3:13:12 | |
I don't think that is the case because I have been out in Liverpool | 3:13:12 | 3:13:16 | |
in the last few days and I see where they're trying | 3:13:16 | 3:13:18 | |
to create diverse neighbourhoods through the schemes | 3:13:18 | 3:13:22 | |
they've operating in Kensington and elsewhere in Liverpool. | 3:13:22 | 3:13:25 | |
My worry is that this is authoritarian and populist | 3:13:27 | 3:13:30 | |
and is about creating a culture of the deserving poor. | 3:13:30 | 3:13:33 | |
It worries me greatly. | 3:13:33 | 3:13:34 | |
APPLAUSE How do you assess people's need? | 3:13:34 | 3:13:39 | |
You have to come up with some system in order to judge people's need | 3:13:40 | 3:13:43 | |
and how high up the list they ought to be. | 3:13:43 | 3:13:46 | |
In my part of the world, we have 3,500 council houses left | 3:13:46 | 3:13:50 | |
in South Lakeland, my district area, a waiting list of 3,500 as well. | 3:13:50 | 3:13:55 | |
-We did have 10,000... -3,500 available? | 3:13:55 | 3:13:57 | |
We have 3,500 houses available and 3,500 on a waiting list. | 3:13:57 | 3:14:01 | |
-You haven't got a problem, have you? -No. | 3:14:01 | 3:14:04 | |
They are all occupied and there are an extra 3,500 waiting to get in. | 3:14:04 | 3:14:07 | |
So 7,000 if you like. The bottom line is a lack | 3:14:07 | 3:14:10 | |
of affordable and social housing in this country. | 3:14:10 | 3:14:13 | |
We did have 10 or 12,000 council houses but somebody has sold them off | 3:14:13 | 3:14:17 | |
and not replace them, the most ludicrous decision ever taken, | 3:14:17 | 3:14:20 | |
which hit Liverpool and every other town in this country. | 3:14:20 | 3:14:23 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:14:23 | 3:14:26 | |
So you were against the right to buy? | 3:14:26 | 3:14:28 | |
I take the view... | 3:14:28 | 3:14:30 | |
Were you against the right to buy? | 3:14:30 | 3:14:32 | |
I am against... I'm in favour of allowing councils to suspend | 3:14:32 | 3:14:36 | |
the right to buy where there is most pressure on their housing stock. | 3:14:36 | 3:14:40 | |
I agree with Caroline. Social housing is not a second best option. | 3:14:40 | 3:14:43 | |
It's a legitimate and honourable option. | 3:14:43 | 3:14:46 | |
We should not demonise people and put them on irregular lists. | 3:14:46 | 3:14:50 | |
The woman on the right. | 3:14:50 | 3:14:53 | |
We are talking about social housing | 3:14:53 | 3:14:55 | |
and how it goes to the most needy in a priority order, | 3:14:55 | 3:14:57 | |
but what about young professionals who cannot access social housing? | 3:14:57 | 3:15:01 | |
We can't rent because the rent is too high, | 3:15:01 | 3:15:04 | |
and we cannot get on the property ladder. | 3:15:04 | 3:15:06 | |
-Are you talking about yourself? -Yes. | 3:15:06 | 3:15:09 | |
Have you applied for social housing? | 3:15:09 | 3:15:11 | |
There is no use, is there? | 3:15:11 | 3:15:14 | |
I live at home with my parents and our house is not seen as overcrowded | 3:15:14 | 3:15:18 | |
so I wouldn't get a look-in on the social housing list. | 3:15:18 | 3:15:21 | |
I don't know enough about it | 3:15:23 | 3:15:26 | |
to talk with any authority at all, to be honest. | 3:15:26 | 3:15:30 | |
You do not need to talk if you don't have any authority. | 3:15:30 | 3:15:33 | |
I think there's one observation I would like to do, to make. | 3:15:34 | 3:15:39 | |
I thought that Ed Miliband's intervention on this issue | 3:15:39 | 3:15:42 | |
was very interesting. | 3:15:42 | 3:15:43 | |
I think that the idea that people can get something for nothing | 3:15:43 | 3:15:47 | |
is difficult. | 3:15:47 | 3:15:49 | |
To encourage people to go out and work and get off a dependency | 3:15:49 | 3:15:55 | |
culture which can go on sometimes for generations is a bold thing. | 3:15:55 | 3:15:59 | |
I think now that it has been suggested by the Tories, | 3:15:59 | 3:16:03 | |
now being adopted by Labour, that is very good. | 3:16:03 | 3:16:06 | |
I went to university, got educated | 3:16:06 | 3:16:09 | |
and I'm not getting anywhere for it now, you know... | 3:16:09 | 3:16:11 | |
Grant Shapps, pick up the cudgels. | 3:16:11 | 3:16:13 | |
I think for somebody in your position, | 3:16:13 | 3:16:15 | |
we've introduced a scheme called First Buy for first-time buyers. | 3:16:15 | 3:16:18 | |
I've looked into that too. What's the point? | 3:16:18 | 3:16:21 | |
You still have to save a deposit to get that | 3:16:21 | 3:16:23 | |
and you have to pay that back in five years' time. | 3:16:23 | 3:16:25 | |
-To me, that does not make sense. -How much have you got to save? | 3:16:25 | 3:16:29 | |
You have to save £5,000 and you have to pay that back. | 3:16:29 | 3:16:32 | |
So you still get a deposit for £80,000 | 3:16:32 | 3:16:36 | |
and the houses you are looking at for £100,000, are tiny. | 3:16:36 | 3:16:39 | |
I'd sooner live in a council house and buy one of those. | 3:16:39 | 3:16:42 | |
Trying to get your 10% deposit that you need, | 3:16:42 | 3:16:45 | |
it's not realistic on my wages, as well. | 3:16:45 | 3:16:49 | |
This is the point... | 3:16:49 | 3:16:51 | |
No, hold on. He's... | 3:16:51 | 3:16:53 | |
The problem is, the biggest commodity we need to live our lives | 3:16:53 | 3:16:57 | |
is a roof over our head. | 3:16:57 | 3:16:59 | |
I may be the first housing minister to ever say this | 3:16:59 | 3:17:01 | |
but I think it is ridiculous that it takes so much | 3:17:01 | 3:17:04 | |
of people's monthly income to have the most basic | 3:17:04 | 3:17:07 | |
of human requirements, to have a roof over your head. | 3:17:07 | 3:17:10 | |
The only way to fix that is through long-term stability in house prices. | 3:17:10 | 3:17:15 | |
You're right, schemes like First Buy which enable you | 3:17:15 | 3:17:18 | |
to get a smaller 5% or 10% deposit are designed to help. | 3:17:18 | 3:17:21 | |
But your wider point is, why shouldn't someone like you who works | 3:17:21 | 3:17:25 | |
have access to the social housing waiting list? | 3:17:25 | 3:17:28 | |
I'd love to access social housing | 3:17:28 | 3:17:30 | |
and have the housing association looking after you but... | 3:17:30 | 3:17:33 | |
So why not expand the Government's spending on social housing? | 3:17:33 | 3:17:38 | |
First of all, we're in this problem of trying to reduce the deficit. | 3:17:38 | 3:17:43 | |
We are going to get a lot more social houses built | 3:17:43 | 3:17:45 | |
as a result of something called affordable rent. | 3:17:45 | 3:17:48 | |
We are going to build 170,000 affordable homes | 3:17:48 | 3:17:51 | |
which exceeds initial expectation... By 2015, the end of the parliament. | 3:17:51 | 3:17:56 | |
But can I get to the original question as well, which was that... | 3:17:56 | 3:18:00 | |
The priority that's given. | 3:18:00 | 3:18:01 | |
Ed Miliband announced in his speech that he thinks if you work, | 3:18:01 | 3:18:05 | |
you should have some priority. | 3:18:05 | 3:18:07 | |
People misunderstand the way the allocation lists work | 3:18:07 | 3:18:10 | |
but, basically, you get points for various situations. | 3:18:10 | 3:18:13 | |
I absolutely agree | 3:18:13 | 3:18:15 | |
because this is our policy, it's in the Localism Bill, | 3:18:15 | 3:18:18 | |
and the housing tenure changes that I am making. | 3:18:18 | 3:18:20 | |
I look forward to the support from the opposition. | 3:18:20 | 3:18:23 | |
It should be the case that if you are in work, that should, | 3:18:23 | 3:18:26 | |
somewhere along the line, be taken into account and you should get | 3:18:26 | 3:18:29 | |
more points for doing the right thing and you should benefit from that | 3:18:29 | 3:18:33 | |
rather than being part of a society where you get something for nothing. | 3:18:33 | 3:18:37 | |
You also floated that if someone got a pay rise they could | 3:18:37 | 3:18:40 | |
be evicted from their council house. That is not helping. | 3:18:40 | 3:18:43 | |
You can misquote me as much as you like but what I actually said... | 3:18:43 | 3:18:47 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:18:47 | 3:18:49 | |
What I actually said is if you find yourself some time later | 3:18:49 | 3:18:52 | |
in a completely different position, | 3:18:52 | 3:18:55 | |
people like the MP Frank Dobson, who earns over £100,000, | 3:18:55 | 3:18:58 | |
then that house was built for somebody in need of housing. | 3:18:58 | 3:19:02 | |
The waiting lists doubled under the time you were in Government | 3:19:02 | 3:19:05 | |
and it is about time... | 3:19:05 | 3:19:06 | |
People can pay to stay and then they can pay their rent. | 3:19:06 | 3:19:10 | |
We think it will raise £56 million by asking people | 3:19:10 | 3:19:14 | |
on high incomes to pay. | 3:19:14 | 3:19:16 | |
With that money, we can build more social housing. | 3:19:16 | 3:19:20 | |
Let's get this problem fixed! | 3:19:20 | 3:19:22 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:19:22 | 3:19:26 | |
No matter what each one of the parties wants, this problem is | 3:19:26 | 3:19:29 | |
going to get so much worse when student fees go up to £9,000. | 3:19:29 | 3:19:33 | |
It's people like me that are going to get slaughtered | 3:19:33 | 3:19:37 | |
when we come out of uni with debt we could pay until we are 53 years old. | 3:19:37 | 3:19:41 | |
A house is just off the agenda, isn't it? What are we going to do? | 3:19:41 | 3:19:46 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:19:46 | 3:19:49 | |
You sir on the fourth row. | 3:19:49 | 3:19:53 | |
I think you can dance around the houses forever and a day | 3:19:53 | 3:19:56 | |
as to how they are allocated | 3:19:56 | 3:19:58 | |
but the fact is that there are just not enough out there. | 3:19:58 | 3:20:00 | |
Caroline, you are right, there is brilliant stuff going on | 3:20:00 | 3:20:04 | |
in how communities are mixed and how we integrate communities. | 3:20:04 | 3:20:08 | |
Forget that argument. | 3:20:08 | 3:20:09 | |
I would like to pick up Grant and say congratulations, | 3:20:09 | 3:20:12 | |
because for the first time I feel with my own organisation | 3:20:12 | 3:20:15 | |
we have managed to exceed what we thought possible. | 3:20:15 | 3:20:18 | |
Your organisation being? | 3:20:18 | 3:20:20 | |
Chester and District Housing Trust and Cosmopolitan Housing Group. | 3:20:20 | 3:20:23 | |
On the back of Grant's proposal of putting 1,058 homes on the ground | 3:20:23 | 3:20:28 | |
in the next three years, | 3:20:28 | 3:20:29 | |
if there's a second round, we could double that. | 3:20:29 | 3:20:31 | |
There's another part as well, and this is a plea to you, Grant. | 3:20:31 | 3:20:35 | |
You have come up with something fantastic and I congratulate you, | 3:20:35 | 3:20:38 | |
but we need to consider the impact of welfare reform. | 3:20:38 | 3:20:42 | |
If you are on the bottom of the rung, it's a bloody tough time. | 3:20:42 | 3:20:45 | |
It really is. I look at some of the residents and I do not know how | 3:20:45 | 3:20:49 | |
they get from week to week. | 3:20:49 | 3:20:50 | |
So the capping of rents? | 3:20:50 | 3:20:52 | |
If you look at housing benefit if it's paid to residents directly, | 3:20:52 | 3:20:56 | |
and most of them don't want it, that will undermine | 3:20:56 | 3:21:00 | |
what is actually a fantastic scheme you have come up with. | 3:21:00 | 3:21:03 | |
OK. I think we should move on. | 3:21:03 | 3:21:05 | |
Let's stick with politics and go to Simon Nolan, please. | 3:21:05 | 3:21:12 | |
Is Ed Miliband's attack on business practices a clear indication that | 3:21:13 | 3:21:17 | |
the Labour Party is moving further to the left under his leadership? | 3:21:17 | 3:21:21 | |
Is the Labour Party moving further to the left, | 3:21:21 | 3:21:25 | |
and what Ed Miliband said was talk about producers | 3:21:25 | 3:21:28 | |
against predators, saying that when Labour came back to power | 3:21:28 | 3:21:32 | |
they would be taxed differently and he would distinguish | 3:21:32 | 3:21:36 | |
between producers and predators, wealth creators and asset strippers. | 3:21:36 | 3:21:40 | |
Is this a move to the left? Janet Street-Porter. | 3:21:40 | 3:21:43 | |
There was a very interesting article in one of the papers today | 3:21:43 | 3:21:47 | |
by James Dyson, picking up on this. | 3:21:47 | 3:21:50 | |
He pointed out he had to move the manufacturing part | 3:21:50 | 3:21:55 | |
of his business abroad because he couldn't get planning permission | 3:21:55 | 3:21:59 | |
to expand his factory in the UK. | 3:21:59 | 3:22:01 | |
He got roundly attacked for that because obviously lots of jobs | 3:22:01 | 3:22:05 | |
went overseas but his businesses has flourished | 3:22:05 | 3:22:10 | |
and the research and development division | 3:22:10 | 3:22:12 | |
and the part of his engineering which develops new products | 3:22:12 | 3:22:16 | |
has expanded, so lots of jobs have come about in the long-term. | 3:22:16 | 3:22:21 | |
I think that this story is an interesting one. | 3:22:21 | 3:22:24 | |
It shows to be successful in business | 3:22:24 | 3:22:27 | |
you've got to be a combination of both. | 3:22:27 | 3:22:30 | |
Both asset stripper and... Wealth creator and predator... | 3:22:30 | 3:22:33 | |
No, very successful businessmen are not good or bad. | 3:22:33 | 3:22:37 | |
They are complex people who at some time during the building | 3:22:37 | 3:22:40 | |
up of their business have to act in a ruthless way. | 3:22:40 | 3:22:45 | |
Business is not as simplistic as Ed Miliband would have. | 3:22:45 | 3:22:50 | |
I think it's absolutely bonkers. | 3:22:50 | 3:22:53 | |
When I watched his speech, it's like loads of placards. Isn't it? | 3:22:53 | 3:22:58 | |
Then you go beyond the placard, and you think, | 3:22:58 | 3:23:00 | |
"But what does he really mean?" | 3:23:00 | 3:23:02 | |
I think it wasn't a good speech. | 3:23:02 | 3:23:07 | |
It's not so much moving to the left, | 3:23:07 | 3:23:09 | |
it's lunching about looking for the daylight, isn't it? | 3:23:09 | 3:23:12 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:23:12 | 3:23:15 | |
I don't know what you think about Ed Miliband, | 3:23:19 | 3:23:22 | |
now it's rumoured he's going to drop you from his Shadow Cabinet. | 3:23:22 | 3:23:25 | |
First I've heard of it. | 3:23:25 | 3:23:26 | |
Maybe this is a chance for you to show your loyalty? | 3:23:26 | 3:23:29 | |
What do you think? | 3:23:29 | 3:23:30 | |
I think that what Ed Miliband was drawing attention to | 3:23:30 | 3:23:33 | |
is the way some businesses behave. | 3:23:33 | 3:23:36 | |
Clearly we've seen, in terms of the bankers, some worrying things | 3:23:36 | 3:23:39 | |
about how that sector operated over a number of years, | 3:23:39 | 3:23:43 | |
but he also talked about, for example this week, | 3:23:43 | 3:23:45 | |
the way with the energy producers, | 3:23:45 | 3:23:48 | |
that we have a bad business model there, | 3:23:48 | 3:23:50 | |
whereby actually it's putting up prices for the average consumer. | 3:23:50 | 3:23:55 | |
What he talked about was looking at how you can open up | 3:23:55 | 3:23:58 | |
and have more competition in that area, | 3:23:58 | 3:24:00 | |
in order to make sure consumers are supported. | 3:24:00 | 3:24:03 | |
He's also talking about... | 3:24:03 | 3:24:04 | |
What was his job before becoming the leader | 3:24:04 | 3:24:07 | |
-of the Labour Party opposition? -He was involved in that, yes. | 3:24:07 | 3:24:11 | |
-LAUGHTER -Was he Energy Secretary? | 3:24:11 | 3:24:13 | |
And Ed was doing work on looking at the energy markets | 3:24:13 | 3:24:17 | |
before we lost the General Election. That is only fair to point out. | 3:24:17 | 3:24:21 | |
What he's saying too, are there ways in way governments | 3:24:21 | 3:24:25 | |
set certain rules that we can also think about encouraging | 3:24:25 | 3:24:28 | |
and supporting businesses that are doing the right thing? | 3:24:28 | 3:24:32 | |
For example, we have huge numbers of government contracts | 3:24:32 | 3:24:35 | |
at national level. There are contracts at a local council level. | 3:24:35 | 3:24:38 | |
Why not say to businesses, "If you win a contract, | 3:24:38 | 3:24:42 | |
"how many apprentices are you taking on?" | 3:24:42 | 3:24:45 | |
Is that a way of encouraging a skill base and opportunity for people? | 3:24:45 | 3:24:48 | |
That isn't what he said. He said they had to be taxed differently. | 3:24:48 | 3:24:51 | |
He was going to distinguish between different types of businesses. | 3:24:51 | 3:24:54 | |
And by tax, what he was talking about is if there are companies | 3:24:54 | 3:24:59 | |
investing in research and design and development, | 3:24:59 | 3:25:02 | |
they could get tax credits to support that activity. | 3:25:02 | 3:25:06 | |
That's about encouraging innovation and jobs. | 3:25:06 | 3:25:10 | |
So there are things about some practises that it's only fair | 3:25:10 | 3:25:13 | |
the government sets rules on, but it's not about being punitive. | 3:25:13 | 3:25:16 | |
It is about rewarding and encouraging good business practice and behaviour. | 3:25:16 | 3:25:21 | |
Then why didn't Labour ever insist that all these companies | 3:25:21 | 3:25:25 | |
had 50% women on the board? You had ten years to do that. | 3:25:25 | 3:25:29 | |
If you talk about good and bad businesses, | 3:25:29 | 3:25:31 | |
women have been ignored by the Labour Party. | 3:25:31 | 3:25:33 | |
But, Janet... APPLAUSE | 3:25:33 | 3:25:35 | |
OK, the man over there, you sir. | 3:25:35 | 3:25:38 | |
Caroline, talking about government contracts, | 3:25:38 | 3:25:42 | |
would you regard good business from the Government being things | 3:25:42 | 3:25:48 | |
like the NHS failed computer system and the nine fire emergency centres | 3:25:48 | 3:25:52 | |
that are costing an arm and a leg and aren't being used. | 3:25:52 | 3:25:55 | |
I would accept that those schemes failed and | 3:25:57 | 3:26:00 | |
we have to look at those and take responsibility. | 3:26:00 | 3:26:02 | |
It is a good point about government procurement and how it works. | 3:26:02 | 3:26:05 | |
Don't be hypocritical. | 3:26:05 | 3:26:08 | |
Jim Murphy has said the same about issues in the Ministry of Defence. | 3:26:08 | 3:26:12 | |
In answer to Janet's point, this is about Ed setting out where he thinks | 3:26:12 | 3:26:16 | |
the Labour Party should go in the future. | 3:26:16 | 3:26:18 | |
You dropped Harriet Harman's proposal to force companies | 3:26:18 | 3:26:21 | |
to have a mandatory number of women on the board. That was shocking. | 3:26:21 | 3:26:24 | |
-Ed wasn't the leader, I don't think. -You sir, in the fourth row. | 3:26:24 | 3:26:27 | |
This speech did not represent a lurch to the left, | 3:26:27 | 3:26:31 | |
but it challenged some orthodoxies, that have been around for the last 30 years. | 3:26:31 | 3:26:36 | |
We have companies taking advantage of Britain's competitiveness, | 3:26:36 | 3:26:40 | |
tax evading, asset-stripping and moving things offshore. | 3:26:40 | 3:26:45 | |
They are taking advantage, but giving nothing back. | 3:26:45 | 3:26:48 | |
Currently, we reward that, like everybody else, | 3:26:48 | 3:26:51 | |
we shouldn't do, we should treat them differently. | 3:26:51 | 3:26:54 | |
Tim Farron, did you agree with what Ed Miliband said? | 3:26:54 | 3:26:58 | |
Were you sympathetic to what he was saying? | 3:26:58 | 3:27:02 | |
If I understood it, that would be a start. | 3:27:02 | 3:27:05 | |
-If you understood what he said? -"Good and bad businesses." | 3:27:05 | 3:27:08 | |
I spent last night in Kendal talking to small businesses that | 3:27:08 | 3:27:12 | |
employ no more than a dozen people, | 3:27:12 | 3:27:15 | |
they are, by and large, paying themselves less than the minimum wage | 3:27:15 | 3:27:19 | |
and keeping these folks in work and working their socks off. | 3:27:19 | 3:27:23 | |
They are good businesses, they are in an awful position | 3:27:23 | 3:27:26 | |
because of bad government decisions in the late 1990s to | 3:27:26 | 3:27:29 | |
deregulate the banks and leave us in the mess we are in now. | 3:27:29 | 3:27:33 | |
Is Miliband taking them to the left? | 3:27:33 | 3:27:35 | |
Well, they spent 13 years in power behaving like Tories, | 3:27:35 | 3:27:39 | |
and now 16 months in opposition behaving like Trots. | 3:27:39 | 3:27:41 | |
That is ridiculous. | 3:27:41 | 3:27:43 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:27:43 | 3:27:44 | |
Absolutely ridiculous. | 3:27:44 | 3:27:48 | |
I am on the right, the Daily Telegraph. | 3:27:48 | 3:27:50 | |
I thought Ed Miliband's speech was one of the most impressive speeches | 3:27:50 | 3:27:55 | |
of a political leader at a party conference for a very long time. | 3:27:55 | 3:27:59 | |
The reason was he was challenging orthodoxy. | 3:27:59 | 3:28:03 | |
We are living in a troubling period. | 3:28:03 | 3:28:07 | |
When all of the beliefs we were brought up to believe | 3:28:07 | 3:28:11 | |
about how society and economy work are being broken. | 3:28:11 | 3:28:15 | |
I think that Ed Miliband is rising to that occasion. | 3:28:15 | 3:28:18 | |
I think that is a very interesting thing. | 3:28:18 | 3:28:21 | |
I would have gone stronger than he did about some aspects of | 3:28:21 | 3:28:25 | |
modern capitalism as it emerged first under Thatcher and then under Blair. | 3:28:25 | 3:28:30 | |
It was encouraged by Blair as much as Thatcher - the feral rich. | 3:28:30 | 3:28:33 | |
There was a reference earlier on to that trader, | 3:28:33 | 3:28:38 | |
that disgusting trader interviewed on BBC, who said he laid awake at | 3:28:38 | 3:28:42 | |
night waiting for the recession and that Goldman Sachs ruled the world. | 3:28:42 | 3:28:47 | |
That is revolting. | 3:28:47 | 3:28:49 | |
That is a disgusting human being. | 3:28:49 | 3:28:52 | |
Something has gone wrong with society. | 3:28:52 | 3:28:54 | |
I think that one of the things that Ed Miliband was doing, | 3:28:54 | 3:28:57 | |
and it is a huge challenge to George Osborne and David Cameron next week, | 3:28:57 | 3:29:01 | |
is that he was trying to bring back morality into the way that this country works. | 3:29:01 | 3:29:07 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:29:07 | 3:29:11 | |
Is that how you read it? | 3:29:11 | 3:29:13 | |
I thought it was bizarre, this idea of good versus bad companies. | 3:29:13 | 3:29:19 | |
I set up a small company, a printing company 20 years ago, | 3:29:19 | 3:29:23 | |
I'm not sure if I were good or bad. | 3:29:23 | 3:29:26 | |
What about if I were a builder and I invested in the town centre in my constituency, | 3:29:26 | 3:29:30 | |
would I be a good builder as I'm building a town centre that needed regeneration? | 3:29:30 | 3:29:36 | |
Or a bad builder because I was investing and taking a gamble? | 3:29:36 | 3:29:39 | |
Would I be good or bad? | 3:29:39 | 3:29:41 | |
That is Alistair Darling's example after hearing that speech. | 3:29:41 | 3:29:44 | |
I have a question for the audience - would Weetabix be good or bad? | 3:29:44 | 3:29:47 | |
The AA? The RAC? McVities? | 3:29:47 | 3:29:49 | |
These are all companies in the bad books of Ed Miliband. | 3:29:49 | 3:29:54 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:29:54 | 3:29:58 | |
Why is Weetabix the bad company? | 3:29:58 | 3:30:02 | |
He didn't mention it in his speech. | 3:30:02 | 3:30:05 | |
No, but they are all invested in by private equity firms | 3:30:05 | 3:30:09 | |
-so in his view, they are the bad guys. -Hang on a second. | 3:30:09 | 3:30:13 | |
At the very back there. | 3:30:13 | 3:30:17 | |
I definitely think that Ed Miliband wouldn't have said | 3:30:17 | 3:30:22 | |
those things one year to an election. | 3:30:22 | 3:30:25 | |
I would like to reiterate that it is very welcoming having moral issues | 3:30:25 | 3:30:30 | |
come back into economic ideas and to the Conservative minister there, | 3:30:30 | 3:30:34 | |
those questions are the right things to say to iron out | 3:30:34 | 3:30:40 | |
those ambivalences that exist and are troubling our society at the minute. | 3:30:40 | 3:30:44 | |
You are not concerned the practicalities weren't spelt out? | 3:30:44 | 3:30:47 | |
You say it's too soon for that? | 3:30:47 | 3:30:50 | |
I think in airing those issues we are having the discussions | 3:30:50 | 3:30:53 | |
and ironing out those things that we need to do. | 3:30:53 | 3:30:56 | |
Man in the second row in the checked shirt. | 3:30:56 | 3:30:59 | |
Peter touched on the issue, the real issue is greed from | 3:30:59 | 3:31:02 | |
the multinational companies who are tax evading. | 3:31:02 | 3:31:06 | |
They are not paying their dues. | 3:31:06 | 3:31:09 | |
We should say they need a measure of corporate responsibility, | 3:31:09 | 3:31:12 | |
to do business in this country | 3:31:12 | 3:31:14 | |
and by extension the European Union, then you have to pay your dues. | 3:31:14 | 3:31:18 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:31:18 | 3:31:22 | |
I'd be interested to see how Labour can, with authority, judge | 3:31:22 | 3:31:27 | |
what is a good and a bad business, considering John Denham's | 3:31:27 | 3:31:31 | |
admission, that not a single member of the Cabinet had run a business? | 3:31:31 | 3:31:36 | |
What Ed Miliband was talking about was not picking | 3:31:36 | 3:31:39 | |
on one sector or another, but talking about bad behaviour. | 3:31:39 | 3:31:42 | |
Just to answer Grant, he's not having an onslaught against every private equity firm, | 3:31:42 | 3:31:48 | |
but let's be honest about this, | 3:31:48 | 3:31:50 | |
it was a private equity funding firm that put Southern Cross on | 3:31:50 | 3:31:54 | |
an unsustainable footing and tried to sell it for a fast buck | 3:31:54 | 3:31:58 | |
leaving old people not knowing where they would live. | 3:31:58 | 3:32:01 | |
Why do you use this example? | 3:32:03 | 3:32:05 | |
I am using the example that within different sectors, that there | 3:32:05 | 3:32:09 | |
is bad behaviour that needs to be at least acknowledged... | 3:32:09 | 3:32:16 | |
What about the person brought in to sort out Northern Rock | 3:32:16 | 3:32:20 | |
was employed by the Government and allowed to have their tax arrangements paid overseas. | 3:32:20 | 3:32:25 | |
So Government colludes with it. | 3:32:25 | 3:32:28 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:32:28 | 3:32:33 | |
I think most people know and are concerned | 3:32:33 | 3:32:35 | |
when they hear of certain companies | 3:32:35 | 3:32:38 | |
and in certain sectors behaving in a way, | 3:32:38 | 3:32:40 | |
whether it is not enforcing the national minimum wage | 3:32:40 | 3:32:43 | |
or whether it is issues around safety of their staff | 3:32:43 | 3:32:46 | |
or when there are actions that don't help the business, | 3:32:46 | 3:32:49 | |
help the employees, what he is talking about is let's have a debate. | 3:32:49 | 3:32:54 | |
We have talked about the bankers on many, many occasions. | 3:32:54 | 3:32:59 | |
Everyone said there is something wrong with the bonus culture in banking, | 3:32:59 | 3:33:03 | |
and the way it created a situation where people were taking risks. | 3:33:03 | 3:33:07 | |
That is an example where we have all had a debate in recent times. | 3:33:07 | 3:33:11 | |
Labour has learned from that, we have all learnt from that, | 3:33:11 | 3:33:14 | |
that banking and regulation must be put on another footing. | 3:33:14 | 3:33:18 | |
That is what Ed Miliband is talking about. | 3:33:18 | 3:33:20 | |
This from the leader, Ed Miliband, | 3:33:20 | 3:33:22 | |
who was the special advisor to Gordon Brown, when they allowed Fred the shred, | 3:33:22 | 3:33:26 | |
who they gave a knighthood to and then gave him £17 million | 3:33:26 | 3:33:29 | |
as a pay off, extraordinary! | 3:33:29 | 3:33:31 | |
APPLAUSE | 3:33:31 | 3:33:36 | |
I think that the Conservatives | 3:33:36 | 3:33:38 | |
wanted to get rid of most of the banking regulations. | 3:33:38 | 3:33:41 | |
So I accept that we made bad mistakes in a number of areas, | 3:33:41 | 3:33:45 | |
but you cannot sit there and say you are totally clean. | 3:33:45 | 3:33:49 | |
The job of the government in this area is to support businesses | 3:33:49 | 3:33:52 | |
and allow people to make a living and create jobs for other people, | 3:33:52 | 3:33:55 | |
but the last Labour government entered power in 1997 and committed the appalling sin | 3:33:55 | 3:34:00 | |
of "out-Thatchering" Mrs Thatcher, deregulating the banks... | 3:34:00 | 3:34:04 | |
Rubbish! We brought in the national minimum wage. | 3:34:04 | 3:34:07 | |
This whole line of appalling collapses, | 3:34:07 | 3:34:10 | |
this is why we are in the mess now it is not because they overspent, | 3:34:10 | 3:34:14 | |
but because they did something even Margaret Thatcher wouldn't do in '97. | 3:34:14 | 3:34:18 | |
Just before we finish the programme, | 3:34:18 | 3:34:20 | |
you said you wanted a divorce from the Tories in three or four years, | 3:34:20 | 3:34:24 | |
the three years is well before an election, | 3:34:24 | 3:34:27 | |
is that what you want to do? | 3:34:27 | 3:34:28 | |
Thank you for allowing me to clarify. | 3:34:28 | 3:34:30 | |
You have to be brief. | 3:34:30 | 3:34:32 | |
Three years and eight months, the coalition needs to last till 2015. | 3:34:32 | 3:34:37 | |
The bottom line is Britain needs stable government. | 3:34:37 | 3:34:41 | |
-How is the marriage going? -It's going all right. | 3:34:41 | 3:34:44 | |
-Why get divorced then? -It would be a perfectly amicable divorce. | 3:34:44 | 3:34:48 | |
The point is it is a temporary arrangement. | 3:34:51 | 3:34:56 | |
Yeah, but you are enjoying the power. | 3:34:56 | 3:34:58 | |
It is not a marriage, it's a temporary arrangement? | 3:34:58 | 3:35:01 | |
It is a business arrangement. | 3:35:01 | 3:35:03 | |
We'd better end there because our time is up. | 3:35:03 | 3:35:06 | |
We are in Salford next week. | 3:35:06 | 3:35:08 | |
Manchester is hosting the Tory Party conference. | 3:35:08 | 3:35:11 | |
The panel next week on Question Time, | 3:35:11 | 3:35:13 | |
the musician Billy Bragg, Jane Moore from The Sun, | 3:35:13 | 3:35:16 | |
Sayeeda Warsi for the Government, Andy Burnham for Labour | 3:35:16 | 3:35:22 | |
and Charles Kennedy for the Liberal Democrats. | 3:35:22 | 3:35:28 | |
The week after that we are in London. | 3:35:28 | 3:35:32 | |
If you want to join the audience for either, | 3:35:32 | 3:35:35 | |
that is Salford next week or London the week after, | 3:35:35 | 3:35:38 | |
our number is on the screen there, the website as well. | 3:35:38 | 3:35:41 | |
Thanks to you on the panel in this very steaming hot Liverpool studio | 3:35:50 | 3:35:52 | |
and to all of you who put up with them. | 3:35:52 | 3:35:53 | |
It was very nice having you here. | 3:35:53 | 3:35:56 | |
Until next Thursday when we are going to be in Salford, good night. | 3:35:56 | 3:35:59 | |
Subtitles by Red Bee Media Ltd | 3:36:14 | 3:36:16 | |
E-mail [email protected] | 3:36:16 | 3:36:18 |