Browse content similar to 18/04/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Tonight we're in Aldershot and welcome to Question Time. | 0:00:02 | 0:00:06 | |
And good evening to you at home, good evening to our audience here | 0:00:11 | 0:00:14 | |
and welcome to our panel - | 0:00:14 | 0:00:16 | |
the former leader of the Conservative party, Michael Howard. | 0:00:16 | 0:00:19 | |
Labour's Shadow Energy Secretary, Caroline Flint. | 0:00:19 | 0:00:22 | |
Liberal Democrat who used to be in the Cabinet looking after | 0:00:22 | 0:00:25 | |
children's affairs, Sarah Teather, | 0:00:25 | 0:00:27 | |
the Daily Mail columnist Amanda Platell, | 0:00:27 | 0:00:30 | |
and the comedian and television presenter Griff Rhys Jones. | 0:00:30 | 0:00:33 | |
Excellent. Thank you very much. | 0:00:45 | 0:00:47 | |
A question from Hector Cameron to kick off, please. | 0:00:47 | 0:00:50 | |
Why should some people get more than £500 per week on benefits | 0:00:50 | 0:00:54 | |
when I only earn £450 a week working 46 hours? | 0:00:54 | 0:00:59 | |
Why should some people... This is what happened this week, | 0:00:59 | 0:01:02 | |
the introduction of the cap on benefits at £500. | 0:01:02 | 0:01:05 | |
Why should some people get over 500 when I only earn 450, | 0:01:05 | 0:01:09 | |
-says Hector Cameron. As what, incidentally? -I do CNC engineering. | 0:01:09 | 0:01:13 | |
-Engineering? -CNC work on CNC machines. | 0:01:13 | 0:01:17 | |
-You probably won't know what that is. -No, I'm afraid I don't. | 0:01:17 | 0:01:21 | |
I won't ask you. Amanda Platell. | 0:01:21 | 0:01:23 | |
Well, Hector, the simple truth is it is completely unfair that people | 0:01:23 | 0:01:27 | |
who go out to work like you take home less money than people | 0:01:27 | 0:01:31 | |
who stay at home. This is quite... | 0:01:31 | 0:01:34 | |
It's quite controversial, this cap, | 0:01:34 | 0:01:36 | |
but it's probably the most popular thing that this government has ever | 0:01:36 | 0:01:40 | |
brought in. I wish they were doing it... | 0:01:40 | 0:01:42 | |
I know Iain Duncan Smith is doing it through conviction, | 0:01:42 | 0:01:44 | |
I'm not sure David Cameron has embraced it for the same reason. | 0:01:44 | 0:01:48 | |
But, basically, the cap is £26,000, which is | 0:01:48 | 0:01:51 | |
the average take-home income. | 0:01:51 | 0:01:53 | |
And you have to be earning £35,000 a year to have that £500 | 0:01:53 | 0:01:58 | |
in your pocket. | 0:01:58 | 0:01:59 | |
And all I would say is, there had to be a huge change and these | 0:01:59 | 0:02:03 | |
are huge changes, | 0:02:03 | 0:02:04 | |
but underneath it all is a moral argument that anyone who goes out | 0:02:04 | 0:02:08 | |
to work should not be worse off than someone who stays at home. | 0:02:08 | 0:02:13 | |
And there are two simple points to make here. | 0:02:13 | 0:02:15 | |
The benefit system is there for, has always been there for, people who | 0:02:15 | 0:02:19 | |
cannot look after themselves, and people who fall on hard times. | 0:02:19 | 0:02:22 | |
It is not a lifestyle choice. | 0:02:22 | 0:02:24 | |
And too often in this country that's what it's become, | 0:02:24 | 0:02:27 | |
and that's why it is so unfair to people like you. | 0:02:27 | 0:02:29 | |
Sarah Teather, you were part of this coalition government | 0:02:37 | 0:02:40 | |
until a bit ago, you're still there presumably supporting. | 0:02:40 | 0:02:43 | |
What do you think? | 0:02:43 | 0:02:44 | |
I think the problem with a lot of the debate around this is that it | 0:02:44 | 0:02:47 | |
misses the human cost involved. | 0:02:47 | 0:02:49 | |
And I know that it sounds like a large amount of money, | 0:02:49 | 0:02:52 | |
but if you're one of my constituents living in a very... | 0:02:52 | 0:02:55 | |
an area with very high housing cost, | 0:02:55 | 0:02:58 | |
you're going to face a really invidious choice when this | 0:02:58 | 0:03:01 | |
benefit cap comes in. You will lose perhaps many hundreds of pounds. | 0:03:01 | 0:03:04 | |
And the choice then for you is, do you move a long way away, | 0:03:04 | 0:03:08 | |
do you move a long way out of London, away from your support network, | 0:03:08 | 0:03:12 | |
away from where you're going to have any chance of getting work, | 0:03:12 | 0:03:16 | |
where your children are in school? | 0:03:16 | 0:03:18 | |
Or do you go into a much smaller property and become very overcrowded? | 0:03:18 | 0:03:23 | |
Or do you split up your family? | 0:03:23 | 0:03:25 | |
So we have to remember what the real cost of this type of policy is, | 0:03:25 | 0:03:29 | |
and I don't think it's going to save any money. | 0:03:29 | 0:03:31 | |
All of the evidence suggests that it is going to save very little money. | 0:03:31 | 0:03:34 | |
It doesn't seem to be getting people back into work. In fact, | 0:03:34 | 0:03:38 | |
it's likely to be counter-productive as people get moved a long way away | 0:03:38 | 0:03:41 | |
from where they live and where they've previously been in work. | 0:03:41 | 0:03:44 | |
And the danger is just that it's a political device. | 0:03:44 | 0:03:47 | |
For me, this is about demonstrating whose side you're on | 0:03:47 | 0:03:50 | |
and I don't like that type of politics. | 0:03:50 | 0:03:52 | |
Let me go back to Hector. | 0:03:52 | 0:03:53 | |
If, if...the landlords know that they get this rent | 0:03:56 | 0:04:00 | |
from the government, so they keep the rents high. | 0:04:00 | 0:04:03 | |
If they know their rents are going to be lower, | 0:04:03 | 0:04:05 | |
-they'll have to lower their rents. But they charge. -Michael Howard. | 0:04:05 | 0:04:09 | |
Well, the question is right. | 0:04:09 | 0:04:11 | |
Of course, Sarah's right too, there is a human cost involved. | 0:04:11 | 0:04:15 | |
And all change of this kind will lead to some hard cases. | 0:04:15 | 0:04:20 | |
And that is very, very regrettable. | 0:04:20 | 0:04:24 | |
But the truth is that, | 0:04:24 | 0:04:25 | |
quite apart from the moral argument which Amanda put forward, which | 0:04:25 | 0:04:30 | |
I agree with, we have to understand | 0:04:30 | 0:04:33 | |
that, as a country, we are in hock. | 0:04:33 | 0:04:37 | |
And we just can't afford to carry on as we have been carrying on. | 0:04:37 | 0:04:42 | |
But there's no evidence this will save any money. | 0:04:42 | 0:04:44 | |
It will save money, it's bound to save money. | 0:04:44 | 0:04:47 | |
-Why is it bound to save money? -Because people will be getting less. | 0:04:47 | 0:04:50 | |
Let me finish. | 0:04:50 | 0:04:52 | |
People will be getting less than they otherwise would have got. | 0:04:52 | 0:04:55 | |
We are in the situation where we are borrowing money, | 0:04:55 | 0:04:59 | |
believe it or not, from countries which have a far lower standard | 0:04:59 | 0:05:03 | |
of living than we have, which don't have any welfare at all. | 0:05:03 | 0:05:06 | |
And it is completely unsustainable, | 0:05:06 | 0:05:09 | |
so we've got to start living within our means and this is | 0:05:09 | 0:05:12 | |
one of the steps which is necessary in order to achieve that. | 0:05:12 | 0:05:16 | |
-I need to... -No, hold on a second, I'll come to you in a moment. | 0:05:16 | 0:05:18 | |
The figure offered is 110 million-a-year savings. | 0:05:18 | 0:05:22 | |
Do you accept that figure? | 0:05:22 | 0:05:23 | |
I don't know whether that's absolutely right. | 0:05:23 | 0:05:25 | |
But these figures add up. | 0:05:25 | 0:05:27 | |
This is not the only step which the Government's taking in order | 0:05:27 | 0:05:30 | |
to reduce the welfare bill. And you have to add them all together | 0:05:30 | 0:05:34 | |
and we have to save money in order to start living within our means. | 0:05:34 | 0:05:37 | |
I'll come back to you, Sarah. Let Caroline Flint come in. | 0:05:37 | 0:05:40 | |
The Government is borrowing 245 billion more pounds | 0:05:40 | 0:05:44 | |
than they were planning to, | 0:05:44 | 0:05:47 | |
because their economic policies are failing | 0:05:47 | 0:05:50 | |
and they haven't got the jobs and growth.... | 0:05:50 | 0:05:52 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:05:52 | 0:05:53 | |
..to get this country back on its feet. | 0:05:53 | 0:05:55 | |
And, in answer to Hector's question, | 0:05:55 | 0:05:58 | |
I fundamentally believe that actually people should be better off in work | 0:05:58 | 0:06:02 | |
than on benefits. I also believe in a benefit cap, but one that can work. | 0:06:02 | 0:06:08 | |
And the problem is, is that because there are different housing costs | 0:06:08 | 0:06:12 | |
around the country, the Government have introduced | 0:06:12 | 0:06:15 | |
this sort of standardised benefit cap that will cause problems. | 0:06:15 | 0:06:19 | |
We argued that we should have localised benefit caps that | 0:06:19 | 0:06:23 | |
did reflect some of the housing costs, | 0:06:23 | 0:06:25 | |
and the truth is, particularly in London, and you make | 0:06:25 | 0:06:27 | |
a very valid point about whether this will bring the rents down. | 0:06:27 | 0:06:31 | |
On the front page of the Evening Standard tonight it says that | 0:06:31 | 0:06:34 | |
rents have gone up by eight times in London, and the truth is, because | 0:06:34 | 0:06:38 | |
there are so many people looking for private rented accommodation, and | 0:06:38 | 0:06:42 | |
because we haven't got enough social homes, council homes to put these | 0:06:42 | 0:06:46 | |
people into, we've got a problem that will emerge because of this. | 0:06:46 | 0:06:50 | |
And the Government say they want to tackle idleness. | 0:06:50 | 0:06:53 | |
Well, why are they making changes that are going to take money away | 0:06:53 | 0:06:56 | |
from people who are actually in work and supporting them in work? | 0:06:56 | 0:07:00 | |
It doesn't add up. | 0:07:00 | 0:07:01 | |
They are putting through incompetent policies that actually aren't | 0:07:01 | 0:07:05 | |
going to achieve what you want. | 0:07:05 | 0:07:06 | |
Are you saying the principle is right but the execution is wrong? | 0:07:12 | 0:07:16 | |
I think the principle is right, I think the execution is wrong, I don't | 0:07:16 | 0:07:19 | |
think it takes account of different housing costs around the country. | 0:07:19 | 0:07:22 | |
And it doesn't solve the problem. | 0:07:22 | 0:07:24 | |
We need to build more social homes for people, that is vital. | 0:07:24 | 0:07:28 | |
We certainly do. | 0:07:32 | 0:07:33 | |
The number of social housing units fell dramatically under the last | 0:07:33 | 0:07:37 | |
Labour government. But I'd like to ask Caroline this question. | 0:07:37 | 0:07:40 | |
If you support regional caps on benefits, | 0:07:40 | 0:07:43 | |
do you support regional benefit levels to start with? | 0:07:43 | 0:07:47 | |
Because you can't have one without the other. | 0:07:47 | 0:07:49 | |
No, I think there is a different issue when it comes to housing. | 0:07:49 | 0:07:52 | |
If you look around the country, Michael, you can see that there are | 0:07:52 | 0:07:55 | |
disparities in terms of housing costs. | 0:07:55 | 0:07:57 | |
The ability in my constituency, in Doncaster, | 0:07:57 | 0:08:00 | |
for people on relatively low medium incomes to buy a house is far | 0:08:00 | 0:08:04 | |
greater opportunity than people on low middle incomes in, say, London. | 0:08:04 | 0:08:08 | |
So I think it needs to reflect that. And the truth is, the truth is, | 0:08:08 | 0:08:12 | |
people in work are having tax credits taken away from them, | 0:08:12 | 0:08:16 | |
so the Government can't argue that they're supporting people in work | 0:08:16 | 0:08:19 | |
because two-thirds of the people affected by some of those changes | 0:08:19 | 0:08:22 | |
are working families who are trying to make ends meet and make work pay. | 0:08:22 | 0:08:26 | |
The problem with this one overall cap is, what it does is | 0:08:26 | 0:08:29 | |
disentangle the link that we have at the moment that recognises | 0:08:29 | 0:08:32 | |
that housing costs different amounts in different areas. | 0:08:32 | 0:08:35 | |
That's the reason why housing benefit rates are different | 0:08:35 | 0:08:38 | |
in different areas. So, it doesn't make any sense. | 0:08:38 | 0:08:41 | |
What really confuses me about this argument is... | 0:08:41 | 0:08:43 | |
I've lived in Britain for a long time now, more than 25 years. | 0:08:43 | 0:08:46 | |
I've known loads of people who, through their circumstances | 0:08:46 | 0:08:49 | |
when their families grew or they lost their job or | 0:08:49 | 0:08:51 | |
they got another job, they moved. They took their kids out of schools. | 0:08:51 | 0:08:54 | |
They accepted that you don't have a God-given right to stay | 0:08:54 | 0:08:57 | |
in the same house. | 0:08:57 | 0:08:59 | |
And I think that your protestations | 0:08:59 | 0:09:01 | |
and Caroline's seem to say that it's a different set of rules. | 0:09:01 | 0:09:05 | |
This goes back to the moral argument. | 0:09:05 | 0:09:06 | |
-Why should there be a different set of rules for people... -Wait! | 0:09:06 | 0:09:09 | |
-CAROLINE: -Where are these people going to go? | 0:09:09 | 0:09:11 | |
There isn't social housing for them to go into | 0:09:11 | 0:09:13 | |
beyond the inner city of London. | 0:09:13 | 0:09:15 | |
-I think it's been very courageous of the Government to do it. -Griff. | 0:09:15 | 0:09:19 | |
Lots of people want to speak but, Griff, your turn. | 0:09:19 | 0:09:22 | |
Well, I'm sitting on the edge here. | 0:09:22 | 0:09:25 | |
And I basically agree with everybody and disagree with them all | 0:09:25 | 0:09:29 | |
at the same time. | 0:09:29 | 0:09:30 | |
The problem that comes here is that we have a welfare system that | 0:09:30 | 0:09:34 | |
has not really been sorted for quite a long time. | 0:09:34 | 0:09:39 | |
It's been fiddled with. | 0:09:39 | 0:09:41 | |
And we live in an unsustainable... equation. | 0:09:41 | 0:09:45 | |
The equation goes like this. | 0:09:45 | 0:09:47 | |
We are... our welfare is billowing and it was predicted, | 0:09:47 | 0:09:50 | |
at the time of the Lisbon Accord by economists who came together | 0:09:50 | 0:09:55 | |
and said, "Look, Western Europe is not basically going to be able | 0:09:55 | 0:09:59 | |
"to afford what it wants to do in the way of welfare. | 0:09:59 | 0:10:03 | |
"And it will have to take some pain along the way." | 0:10:03 | 0:10:06 | |
But what I also recognise, and what is very, very true, | 0:10:06 | 0:10:09 | |
is that because we have left it so late, because we're now | 0:10:09 | 0:10:12 | |
engaged in a form of tinkering, we're going to cause some real, | 0:10:12 | 0:10:15 | |
genuine pain to people | 0:10:15 | 0:10:17 | |
who have become reliant on a system which is so complicated that, | 0:10:17 | 0:10:22 | |
as we sit to discuss it here, | 0:10:22 | 0:10:24 | |
we can't even find a sort of conclusion about what we are | 0:10:24 | 0:10:28 | |
talking about, and this is the first of 20, at least 20 measures | 0:10:28 | 0:10:32 | |
which are going to play with a really complicated welfare system. | 0:10:32 | 0:10:35 | |
There are... | 0:10:35 | 0:10:36 | |
We have a situation in this country where we have encouraged people, | 0:10:36 | 0:10:40 | |
quite rightly, | 0:10:40 | 0:10:41 | |
to stay in higher education till the age of 21 or later, | 0:10:41 | 0:10:45 | |
and then we retire at a relatively early age, I mean, and then | 0:10:45 | 0:10:49 | |
we try to live, thanks to the National Health Service, | 0:10:49 | 0:10:52 | |
till beyond 100. | 0:10:52 | 0:10:54 | |
And under those circumstances, the actual time we spend | 0:10:54 | 0:10:57 | |
as productive people putting money into the pot is not quite working. | 0:10:57 | 0:11:01 | |
It's not adding up. | 0:11:01 | 0:11:02 | |
The woman there in the striped... | 0:11:06 | 0:11:09 | |
Striped thing, yes. | 0:11:09 | 0:11:11 | |
I would quite like to agree with Amanda. | 0:11:11 | 0:11:13 | |
I don't understand why there seems to be two different rules, | 0:11:13 | 0:11:16 | |
one if you're on benefits and one if you're working. | 0:11:16 | 0:11:20 | |
I work. I can't afford to live in London - so guess what? I don't. | 0:11:20 | 0:11:23 | |
Yes? Woman up there in white. | 0:11:27 | 0:11:30 | |
There's only a certain number of people in the country that | 0:11:30 | 0:11:33 | |
the money is taken from their taxes to pay the benefits. | 0:11:33 | 0:11:37 | |
And we can't already sort out the benefits that people are getting, | 0:11:37 | 0:11:41 | |
so why is it that when people from abroad come into our country, they | 0:11:41 | 0:11:45 | |
are not here for very long before they also are receiving benefits? | 0:11:45 | 0:11:49 | |
We can't make what we've got go round with the people that we've got | 0:11:49 | 0:11:52 | |
here already without this additional number of people | 0:11:52 | 0:11:54 | |
-coming in from outside. -All right. | 0:11:54 | 0:11:57 | |
We'll take the woman there and then I'll come to you, Sarah. | 0:12:00 | 0:12:03 | |
The point that everyone seems to have overlooked is that the vast | 0:12:03 | 0:12:06 | |
majority of benefits recipients in this country are working people. | 0:12:06 | 0:12:10 | |
-APPLAUSE -And... | 0:12:10 | 0:12:12 | |
What the benefit system is actually doing is subsidising big companies | 0:12:14 | 0:12:18 | |
to pay starvation wages, | 0:12:18 | 0:12:20 | |
and the solution would be to raise the minimum wage.... | 0:12:20 | 0:12:23 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:12:23 | 0:12:24 | |
If the minimum wage were raised to a living standard, | 0:12:24 | 0:12:28 | |
then not only would fewer people claim benefits, | 0:12:28 | 0:12:31 | |
but there would be greater tax revenue as well. | 0:12:31 | 0:12:33 | |
And are you in favour of, in that context, | 0:12:33 | 0:12:35 | |
-of a cap on welfare payments? -No, I don't think it's the answer. | 0:12:35 | 0:12:38 | |
Michael Howard, | 0:12:38 | 0:12:39 | |
what do you say to the idea of raising the minimum wage? | 0:12:39 | 0:12:42 | |
Well, it sounds very attractive in principle. | 0:12:42 | 0:12:45 | |
But there would be many companies that simply couldn't afford | 0:12:45 | 0:12:48 | |
to pay a higher minimum wage, | 0:12:48 | 0:12:51 | |
and they would then start laying people off. | 0:12:51 | 0:12:54 | |
They might even go out of business. | 0:12:54 | 0:12:56 | |
And the result might be that you would actually have fewer people | 0:12:56 | 0:12:59 | |
in work than you started off with. | 0:12:59 | 0:13:01 | |
That would not be what you want, and certainly not what I want. | 0:13:01 | 0:13:04 | |
Isn't that the same argument the Tories used | 0:13:04 | 0:13:06 | |
-when it was first introduced? -And it all depends on the level | 0:13:06 | 0:13:09 | |
at which you put the minimum wage. | 0:13:09 | 0:13:11 | |
-Of course. -Exactly. -£50 an hour might be tricky. | 0:13:11 | 0:13:14 | |
And if you increase it, you may well get the kind of... | 0:13:14 | 0:13:17 | |
This is the argument you used when the minimum wage first came in. | 0:13:17 | 0:13:19 | |
You said all hell will be let loose, jobs will disappear. Did they? | 0:13:19 | 0:13:23 | |
Depending on the level at which it was fixed. | 0:13:23 | 0:13:25 | |
The level it was fixed, did they disappear? No. | 0:13:25 | 0:13:27 | |
Because it was fixed at a low level. | 0:13:27 | 0:13:29 | |
The answer to this is also about access to jobs. | 0:13:29 | 0:13:32 | |
There's something like 1.5 million people working part-time | 0:13:32 | 0:13:35 | |
who are desperate to work full-time, | 0:13:35 | 0:13:37 | |
and they really do want to do that but the jobs are not there. | 0:13:37 | 0:13:40 | |
And the truth is, | 0:13:40 | 0:13:42 | |
unemployment has gone up again in the figures this week. | 0:13:42 | 0:13:45 | |
Unemployment is higher today than it was in 2010, and Osborne and Cameron | 0:13:45 | 0:13:49 | |
have to listen to organisations like the IMF and others who say... | 0:13:49 | 0:13:52 | |
-AMANDA: -Let's not talk about the IMF! -No, I'm sorry. | 0:13:52 | 0:13:55 | |
..who say you have to do something to tackle growth, | 0:13:55 | 0:13:57 | |
cos the way out of this is through jobs and growth | 0:13:57 | 0:14:00 | |
and giving people the chance to earn more. | 0:14:00 | 0:14:02 | |
Let's just come back, come back to the question Hector asked | 0:14:02 | 0:14:05 | |
originally. The man there in the very back row, you, sir. | 0:14:05 | 0:14:08 | |
The majority of welfare goes on pensions, not on benefits. | 0:14:08 | 0:14:13 | |
Shouldn't we be focusing on pensions instead? | 0:14:13 | 0:14:15 | |
And to the lady talking about immigrants claiming benefits, | 0:14:15 | 0:14:19 | |
the majority of immigrants, the claim rate amongst immigrants | 0:14:19 | 0:14:22 | |
is much lower, of benefits, than it is amongst the general population. | 0:14:22 | 0:14:25 | |
So are you saying you'd favour a cut in state pensions, | 0:14:25 | 0:14:29 | |
as a way of reducing the welfare bill? | 0:14:29 | 0:14:30 | |
We're focusing on the wrong thing by focusing on welfare | 0:14:30 | 0:14:33 | |
in a divisive campaign by the Conservatives, | 0:14:33 | 0:14:35 | |
when the whole point is that we should focus on pensions | 0:14:35 | 0:14:38 | |
but we won't because Cameron has made a promise about not | 0:14:38 | 0:14:41 | |
cutting pensions because that's where his voter base is. | 0:14:41 | 0:14:43 | |
You'd like to see pensions cut? | 0:14:43 | 0:14:45 | |
I think it has to be put on the table. | 0:14:45 | 0:14:46 | |
Pensions have to be put on the table instead of this divisive attack | 0:14:46 | 0:14:50 | |
on people on benefits. | 0:14:50 | 0:14:51 | |
The woman here in the third row. | 0:14:51 | 0:14:53 | |
Honestly, I think instead of cutting benefits | 0:14:53 | 0:14:56 | |
we should be not encouraging big developers to move into our areas. | 0:14:56 | 0:14:59 | |
I'm part of a campaign to save a company, | 0:14:59 | 0:15:02 | |
to stop it from being turned into a McDonald's drive-thru. | 0:15:02 | 0:15:05 | |
It does not offer a full-time liveable wage. | 0:15:05 | 0:15:08 | |
Instead of encouraging people to go to these companies, | 0:15:08 | 0:15:11 | |
why not encourage local businesses? | 0:15:11 | 0:15:12 | |
Why not encourage local communities to look after themselves | 0:15:12 | 0:15:16 | |
-to basically stop other people from going on benefits? -OK. | 0:15:16 | 0:15:19 | |
And the man up there on the far left. You, sir. | 0:15:19 | 0:15:21 | |
I just want to ask Michael Howard. | 0:15:22 | 0:15:25 | |
Tesco spent 1.2 billion in costs of winding up their US arm this week. | 0:15:25 | 0:15:30 | |
Couldn't that have been spent on giving their workers a better wage? | 0:15:30 | 0:15:34 | |
Well, Tesco will make their own decisions. | 0:15:34 | 0:15:37 | |
They're an independent, private company and they will | 0:15:37 | 0:15:39 | |
make their own decisions as to how that money can best be used. | 0:15:39 | 0:15:43 | |
And the more successful Tesco are, the more shops they open, | 0:15:43 | 0:15:48 | |
then the more people they employ and the better off everyone is. | 0:15:48 | 0:15:52 | |
They're the best people to decide how to spend that money. | 0:15:52 | 0:15:57 | |
What you're saying is that they actually can't afford it. | 0:15:57 | 0:16:00 | |
Clearly they can because, like I said, they spent 1.2 billion. | 0:16:00 | 0:16:04 | |
I'm not saying they can't afford it. | 0:16:04 | 0:16:06 | |
They're the best people to decide how to use their resources. | 0:16:06 | 0:16:10 | |
And they're using it in a way which makes them more prosperous, | 0:16:10 | 0:16:13 | |
which creates more jobs and which is for the benefit of the country. | 0:16:13 | 0:16:17 | |
One more point from over there and then, Sarah, one point from you. | 0:16:17 | 0:16:20 | |
Yes? | 0:16:20 | 0:16:21 | |
Just going back to the point about a living wage, | 0:16:21 | 0:16:24 | |
you say that companies may not be happy to pay it, but yet again | 0:16:24 | 0:16:27 | |
this week we found out another company paid no tax to this country. | 0:16:27 | 0:16:32 | |
And it seems that your government are more concerned with keeping | 0:16:32 | 0:16:35 | |
your friends in business happy | 0:16:35 | 0:16:38 | |
than keeping the welfare and the happiness of your population | 0:16:38 | 0:16:41 | |
in general, because you'd rather not upset the businesses | 0:16:41 | 0:16:44 | |
and upset people who are trying to make their way in life. | 0:16:44 | 0:16:47 | |
I just want to come back on some of the points being raised. | 0:16:54 | 0:16:57 | |
Just one point. We can't go on for much longer on this. | 0:16:57 | 0:17:00 | |
Consistently people are saying it's going to save a lot of money. | 0:17:00 | 0:17:02 | |
I think we have to put it in perspective. | 0:17:02 | 0:17:04 | |
Many people in my constituency who are going to be affected by this | 0:17:04 | 0:17:07 | |
have been housed by the council. | 0:17:07 | 0:17:09 | |
That means the council's going to have to move them. | 0:17:09 | 0:17:11 | |
There will be costs, | 0:17:11 | 0:17:13 | |
so even if it looks like there are some savings in welfare, there are | 0:17:13 | 0:17:16 | |
going to be massive costs to councils in order to deal with this. | 0:17:16 | 0:17:19 | |
There won't be any savings, and Eric Pickles knows this | 0:17:19 | 0:17:21 | |
because we know that he was writing letters around Government | 0:17:21 | 0:17:25 | |
that ended up in the Observer about 18 months ago, | 0:17:25 | 0:17:29 | |
so we know full well that there really aren't going to be... | 0:17:29 | 0:17:32 | |
Your Liberal colleagues have voted with this in Government. | 0:17:32 | 0:17:34 | |
-You may not have, but the rest did. -I didn't vote with it. | 0:17:34 | 0:17:37 | |
You seem to differ from the Government on quite a lot of things. | 0:17:37 | 0:17:40 | |
Not on quite a lot of things, no. | 0:17:40 | 0:17:42 | |
You do still approve of the coalition? | 0:17:42 | 0:17:44 | |
-I do approve of the coalition. -You sure? -But on this... | 0:17:44 | 0:17:47 | |
-LAUGHTER -On this... | 0:17:47 | 0:17:49 | |
I don't like this type of politics. | 0:17:49 | 0:17:51 | |
The setting up of dividing lines just to prove which side you're on. | 0:17:51 | 0:17:54 | |
It's not good for the country. | 0:17:54 | 0:17:56 | |
I just wanted to say that the examples of bad practice, | 0:17:56 | 0:18:00 | |
whether it's people exploiting the system, the welfare system, | 0:18:00 | 0:18:05 | |
or people being hurt, individuals being hurt | 0:18:05 | 0:18:09 | |
by the welfare system, or, indeed, businesses, | 0:18:09 | 0:18:12 | |
individual businesses that don't pay any tax | 0:18:12 | 0:18:16 | |
and become a sort of exemplar of bad behaviour, | 0:18:16 | 0:18:20 | |
don't actually help us with trying to deal with the major problem. | 0:18:20 | 0:18:26 | |
-The major problem is still... -They're exceptional cases. | 0:18:26 | 0:18:29 | |
Exceptional cases which tend to become part of the political | 0:18:29 | 0:18:33 | |
language don't really help us in this problem. | 0:18:33 | 0:18:36 | |
We will go on to another question, thanks. | 0:18:36 | 0:18:39 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:18:39 | 0:18:41 | |
It's a good debate. | 0:18:41 | 0:18:43 | |
You can join in on text or Twitter, as you know. | 0:18:43 | 0:18:47 | |
And you can text us. | 0:18:49 | 0:18:53 | |
The red button, if you push it, will tell you what others are... | 0:18:53 | 0:18:57 | |
texting. A question now from Alison Fox, please. Alison Fox. | 0:18:57 | 0:19:01 | |
Are we all Thatcherites now? | 0:19:03 | 0:19:06 | |
Are we Thatcherites now? | 0:19:06 | 0:19:08 | |
This is in the light of what the | 0:19:08 | 0:19:10 | |
Prime Minister said yesterday, | 0:19:10 | 0:19:12 | |
before Lady Thatcher's funeral, | 0:19:12 | 0:19:14 | |
-on the radio, apparently. -Yes. | 0:19:14 | 0:19:16 | |
He said, "In a sense, we are all Thatcherites now." | 0:19:16 | 0:19:19 | |
So we just want to tease this out a bit with Michael Howard, perhaps. | 0:19:19 | 0:19:23 | |
-Michael? -Well, in a sense we are. | 0:19:23 | 0:19:26 | |
-No surprise that I agree with the Prime Minister. -What does it mean? | 0:19:26 | 0:19:29 | |
Well, I think it means this. | 0:19:29 | 0:19:31 | |
Let me suggest a test, which you can apply to this argument. | 0:19:31 | 0:19:37 | |
We've had 13 years of Labour government | 0:19:37 | 0:19:41 | |
between Margaret Thatcher's leaving office and today. | 0:19:41 | 0:19:45 | |
If you look back on the major reforms which she put in place, | 0:19:46 | 0:19:51 | |
reform of the trade unions, privatisation... | 0:19:51 | 0:19:55 | |
..13 years of Labour government didn't reverse any of them. | 0:19:56 | 0:20:01 | |
Look at the tax rate. | 0:20:01 | 0:20:03 | |
Not long before she became Prime Minister, income tax was at 98%. | 0:20:03 | 0:20:09 | |
It was reduced gradually under her office to 40 pence in the pound. | 0:20:09 | 0:20:15 | |
And it stayed the maximum rate of income taxed at 40p in the pound | 0:20:15 | 0:20:19 | |
until just a few days before the 2010 election. | 0:20:19 | 0:20:23 | |
So if you look back at the major reforms which she put in place, | 0:20:23 | 0:20:27 | |
very controversial at the time, they've largely been accepted. | 0:20:27 | 0:20:32 | |
The gap between the major parties now | 0:20:32 | 0:20:36 | |
is much smaller than it was when I entered Parliament in 1983. | 0:20:36 | 0:20:41 | |
Michael Foot was leading the Labour Party, they were committed to more | 0:20:41 | 0:20:45 | |
public ownership, higher taxation, unilateral nuclear disarmament. | 0:20:45 | 0:20:49 | |
The gap has closed, largely because | 0:20:49 | 0:20:52 | |
the Labour Party has moved towards us, and not vice versa. | 0:20:52 | 0:20:56 | |
And in that sense, we are all Thatcherites now. | 0:20:56 | 0:20:59 | |
So you mean we're all Conservatives now? | 0:20:59 | 0:21:01 | |
I think... | 0:21:02 | 0:21:04 | |
I think Margaret Thatcher won the major arguments | 0:21:04 | 0:21:07 | |
and that's responsible for a new - | 0:21:07 | 0:21:10 | |
divisive figure though she was in her time - a new consensus. | 0:21:10 | 0:21:14 | |
Of course we don't agree on everything, | 0:21:14 | 0:21:16 | |
but on the major issues, yes, we're all Thatcherites now. | 0:21:16 | 0:21:20 | |
Caroline Flint. | 0:21:20 | 0:21:21 | |
Um, I am certainly not a Thatcherite. | 0:21:21 | 0:21:24 | |
I profoundly disagree with many policies that Margaret Thatcher | 0:21:24 | 0:21:29 | |
led on in government. | 0:21:29 | 0:21:30 | |
I think she oversaw mass unemployment in our country, I think | 0:21:30 | 0:21:36 | |
even though clearly, in terms of parts of our industry | 0:21:36 | 0:21:39 | |
during that time, it had to change, I think | 0:21:39 | 0:21:42 | |
she devastated communities by treating hard-working people | 0:21:42 | 0:21:45 | |
in our industrial heartlands as the enemy within. | 0:21:45 | 0:21:48 | |
And I think some of the legacy of Margaret Thatcher... | 0:21:48 | 0:21:50 | |
It was specifically the miners, wasn't it? | 0:21:50 | 0:21:53 | |
That wasn't a general attack on people in industry. | 0:21:53 | 0:21:55 | |
-Well, if you look at... -It was about the miners' strike. | 0:21:55 | 0:21:58 | |
And what she did, though, David, was rather, | 0:21:58 | 0:22:01 | |
in terms of her head-to-head with people like Arthur Scargill, | 0:22:01 | 0:22:04 | |
she broadened that out to devastate mining communities | 0:22:04 | 0:22:07 | |
and steel communities, and the legacy of that is there today. | 0:22:07 | 0:22:11 | |
Many people, many men... | 0:22:11 | 0:22:13 | |
We were just talking about welfare. | 0:22:13 | 0:22:16 | |
Many men were put on incapacity benefit as a way to hide | 0:22:16 | 0:22:19 | |
the unemployment figures. It was unacceptable. | 0:22:19 | 0:22:22 | |
It was unacceptable to me that she didn't support economic sanctions | 0:22:22 | 0:22:26 | |
against South Africa. It was unacceptable that she | 0:22:26 | 0:22:29 | |
supported the poll tax. It was unacceptable to me that she | 0:22:29 | 0:22:32 | |
stigmatised gay and lesbian people through section 28. | 0:22:32 | 0:22:36 | |
So I am not a Thatcherite. | 0:22:36 | 0:22:38 | |
But all parties have to adapt to change. | 0:22:38 | 0:22:41 | |
The Labour government introduced a national minimum wage. | 0:22:41 | 0:22:45 | |
The Tories and the Liberal Democrats voted against it. | 0:22:45 | 0:22:49 | |
They wouldn't change it now, so are they all Blairites? | 0:22:49 | 0:22:53 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:22:53 | 0:22:56 | |
Why did your two Labour Prime Ministers make a point of inviting | 0:23:01 | 0:23:08 | |
Lady Thatcher to Number 10, hosting her, shaking hands on the steps? | 0:23:08 | 0:23:13 | |
-Were you in favour of that? -I think... Well, I think... | 0:23:13 | 0:23:16 | |
-Michael Howard is right? -I don't think that means that they agree | 0:23:16 | 0:23:19 | |
with all the policies that she led on in government for one minute. | 0:23:19 | 0:23:22 | |
You wouldn't have invited her if you'd been Prime Minister? | 0:23:22 | 0:23:25 | |
I think there's lots of things that happen in politics and, | 0:23:25 | 0:23:28 | |
rather like the funeral this week, which was agreed to, | 0:23:28 | 0:23:30 | |
I understand, I don't know the details of it, by Gordon Brown | 0:23:30 | 0:23:34 | |
and Tony Blair, some of the arrangements were agreed to before. | 0:23:34 | 0:23:37 | |
Some of it is about what you do in politics. | 0:23:37 | 0:23:39 | |
We do not spend our time in the House of Commons attacking each other | 0:23:39 | 0:23:42 | |
in the corridors. | 0:23:42 | 0:23:43 | |
I think there'd be people having strokes and heart attacks | 0:23:43 | 0:23:46 | |
if they spent their time so hyped up on that, | 0:23:46 | 0:23:49 | |
but you can be polite, you can respect people | 0:23:49 | 0:23:52 | |
and I have said she deserves credit for the fact that she overcame | 0:23:52 | 0:23:57 | |
opposition in her party to become the first woman leader. | 0:23:57 | 0:24:00 | |
She did win three general elections, but I do not believe that | 0:24:00 | 0:24:04 | |
overall what she did for our country was good. | 0:24:04 | 0:24:07 | |
And the legacy of that in communities is still being felt today. | 0:24:07 | 0:24:12 | |
You, sir. | 0:24:12 | 0:24:13 | |
-Yes? -Thank you. | 0:24:16 | 0:24:17 | |
Caroline, you mentioned Mrs Thatcher's policies in South Africa. | 0:24:17 | 0:24:21 | |
Two or three weeks ago there was a wonderful article | 0:24:21 | 0:24:24 | |
in The Times by one of her ambassadorial staff that said | 0:24:24 | 0:24:27 | |
she was for inclusion because she didn't feel that economic sanctions | 0:24:27 | 0:24:30 | |
would be productive and you'd only further isolate South Africa. | 0:24:30 | 0:24:33 | |
But yet in your final sentence you said you had to be polite | 0:24:33 | 0:24:36 | |
and respectful, and that's exactly what she was trying to achieve, | 0:24:36 | 0:24:39 | |
so whilst there was an outside view that she was being confrontational | 0:24:39 | 0:24:43 | |
and gladiatorial with South Africa, | 0:24:43 | 0:24:45 | |
that was the furthest thing she wanted to do. | 0:24:45 | 0:24:47 | |
She wanted to take an inclusive route. | 0:24:47 | 0:24:49 | |
The problem was, both anti-apartheid... | 0:24:49 | 0:24:51 | |
I'm sorry, but at the time, and I was | 0:24:51 | 0:24:54 | |
involved in campaigning against apartheid in South Africa, but | 0:24:54 | 0:24:58 | |
at the time anti-apartheid and the ANC said, we need economic sanctions. | 0:24:58 | 0:25:03 | |
That is what they were asking for. | 0:25:03 | 0:25:05 | |
People in South Africa, black people, were being treated appallingly. | 0:25:05 | 0:25:08 | |
Their economic circumstances were bad anyway. | 0:25:08 | 0:25:11 | |
And that is one thing she refused to do. | 0:25:11 | 0:25:14 | |
Let's not go down this road. | 0:25:14 | 0:25:15 | |
What the Prime Minister said was that, | 0:25:15 | 0:25:17 | |
"We are all, in a sense, Thatcherites now." | 0:25:17 | 0:25:20 | |
Griff Rhys Jones, do you think we're all Thatcherites now? | 0:25:20 | 0:25:23 | |
Well, we have funerals to reach a state of closure, don't we? | 0:25:23 | 0:25:28 | |
And I really think it's time we all moved on. | 0:25:28 | 0:25:32 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:25:32 | 0:25:35 | |
When I was a boy, | 0:25:40 | 0:25:42 | |
we were slightly brought up with an obsession with the Second World War. | 0:25:42 | 0:25:46 | |
Everything was related to the war | 0:25:46 | 0:25:47 | |
and we couldn't watch a TV programme without it | 0:25:47 | 0:25:49 | |
being about the war, and now the only historical thing that | 0:25:49 | 0:25:52 | |
seems to have happened to Britain since then is Thatcher. | 0:25:52 | 0:25:55 | |
I feel that we are, in a way, Thatcher's children, but one | 0:25:55 | 0:25:59 | |
of the things that's very important to me is that we're being accused | 0:25:59 | 0:26:03 | |
now - we're digging up apartheid again, digging up all sorts of.... | 0:26:03 | 0:26:06 | |
Either Thatcher was a marvellous thing, | 0:26:06 | 0:26:08 | |
but also a sort of rather strange idea that we, as a nation, | 0:26:08 | 0:26:11 | |
have become people who are extremely greedy as a result of Mrs Thatcher. | 0:26:11 | 0:26:16 | |
A sort of nonsense notion, we are | 0:26:16 | 0:26:19 | |
still human beings with our own decisions to make | 0:26:19 | 0:26:22 | |
and we should stick by those and believe in ourselves | 0:26:22 | 0:26:25 | |
and start looking to the future instead of referring | 0:26:25 | 0:26:28 | |
all the time to what Mrs Thatcher did and what she achieved. | 0:26:28 | 0:26:31 | |
You could say there's an Attlee generation as well | 0:26:37 | 0:26:40 | |
as a Thatcher generation. | 0:26:40 | 0:26:41 | |
Well, we don't hear so much from them, do we, these days? | 0:26:41 | 0:26:44 | |
-I don't know. Sarah Teather. -I think we are Thatcher's children. | 0:26:44 | 0:26:48 | |
Certainly, if I think back, | 0:26:48 | 0:26:50 | |
I can't remember anything before she came to power. | 0:26:50 | 0:26:52 | |
-AMANDA: -She asked, were we Thatcherites. -Exactly. | 0:26:52 | 0:26:54 | |
I was about to say, we're Thatcher's children | 0:26:54 | 0:26:57 | |
but I don't think we're all Thatcherites. | 0:26:57 | 0:26:58 | |
I'm certainly not a Thatcherite. | 0:26:58 | 0:27:01 | |
In terms of my politics, | 0:27:01 | 0:27:03 | |
it was formed out of opposing Margaret Thatcher. | 0:27:03 | 0:27:05 | |
I can't remember anything before she came to power, | 0:27:05 | 0:27:08 | |
and all of my political growing up was formed by disagreeing | 0:27:08 | 0:27:11 | |
with almost everything that she did. | 0:27:11 | 0:27:13 | |
And I've continued to disagree with an awful lot of what she did. | 0:27:13 | 0:27:16 | |
Why weren't those things undone then? | 0:27:16 | 0:27:19 | |
The key things - trade union reform, for instance, wasn't changed, | 0:27:19 | 0:27:22 | |
privatisation - nobody is suggesting re-nationalising everything. | 0:27:22 | 0:27:26 | |
You can disagree with an awful lot of... | 0:27:26 | 0:27:28 | |
But these are the main planks Michael is putting forward. | 0:27:28 | 0:27:30 | |
It doesn't mean that it's right to undo everything | 0:27:30 | 0:27:33 | |
and, on some things, we're not going to go back to suddenly | 0:27:33 | 0:27:35 | |
nationalising all of the industries again. | 0:27:35 | 0:27:37 | |
But there are lots of things on which I profoundly disagreed | 0:27:37 | 0:27:40 | |
and which were reversed and which we wouldn't want to do again. | 0:27:40 | 0:27:43 | |
I profoundly disagree with her attitudes towards Europe, | 0:27:43 | 0:27:46 | |
for example, her attitude towards the poorest, her attitude | 0:27:46 | 0:27:48 | |
around unemployment, thinking it was OK to let unemployment rise, | 0:27:48 | 0:27:52 | |
rather than actually seeing that it was really important | 0:27:52 | 0:27:56 | |
to focus on getting people into work. | 0:27:56 | 0:27:57 | |
Will you ever credit her with the fact that, when she came to power, | 0:27:57 | 0:28:00 | |
she inherited rising unemployment and she brought it down? | 0:28:00 | 0:28:03 | |
It just seems like there are endless lies, like about South Africa, | 0:28:03 | 0:28:07 | |
about the notion of society, about unemployment. | 0:28:07 | 0:28:10 | |
She brought unemployment down. | 0:28:10 | 0:28:11 | |
There were more people working when she left power. | 0:28:11 | 0:28:14 | |
This country was a cot case when she took over and even Russia | 0:28:14 | 0:28:20 | |
wouldn't buy goods from us because they were badly made, | 0:28:20 | 0:28:22 | |
they couldn't deliver them on time and we couldn't keep to any agenda | 0:28:22 | 0:28:26 | |
because of the unions. She changed that. | 0:28:26 | 0:28:29 | |
Harold Wilson closed more mines than Margaret Thatcher. | 0:28:29 | 0:28:31 | |
It was the Tories who got rid of her! | 0:28:31 | 0:28:33 | |
Tony Blair oversaw more of the closure of manufacturing | 0:28:33 | 0:28:36 | |
in this country than Margaret Thatcher did. | 0:28:36 | 0:28:38 | |
Can we just get a bit of perspective? Without her, | 0:28:38 | 0:28:42 | |
this country would be, you know, the cot case of Europe, and it ended up | 0:28:42 | 0:28:46 | |
the third or fourth richest economy in the world when she left. | 0:28:46 | 0:28:49 | |
That creates jobs and that created a future for people in this | 0:28:49 | 0:28:52 | |
country, people like me. And I would say, with her example | 0:28:52 | 0:28:54 | |
as first woman Prime Minister, people like both of you here too. | 0:28:54 | 0:28:58 | |
The woman on the gangway. Yes. | 0:29:03 | 0:29:06 | |
I don't actually like being categorised as one thing or another. | 0:29:06 | 0:29:09 | |
I'm actually my own person | 0:29:09 | 0:29:10 | |
and I'm not a Thatcherite, I'm a nothingite! | 0:29:10 | 0:29:14 | |
You know, it's like, I have my own beliefs, I don't live in the past. | 0:29:14 | 0:29:18 | |
I'm looking towards the future. | 0:29:18 | 0:29:19 | |
And I don't think there's anything to be gained by keep | 0:29:19 | 0:29:22 | |
going over and over, and over things that have already been debated for | 0:29:22 | 0:29:26 | |
the last 20-odd years, and why don't we move on, and look to the future? | 0:29:26 | 0:29:31 | |
We don't have to change everything, like the recent coalition has done, | 0:29:31 | 0:29:35 | |
as soon as you get into power you've got to undo everything and then | 0:29:35 | 0:29:38 | |
you make a real mess of everything, and it costs more, and more money. | 0:29:38 | 0:29:43 | |
OK. And you, sir, in the middle. Third row from the back, there. | 0:29:43 | 0:29:47 | |
Today it was announced in Liverpool that Anne Williams | 0:29:47 | 0:29:50 | |
died of her illness, her son died, Kevin, died in Hillsborough | 0:29:50 | 0:29:55 | |
and he never saw justice because of Margaret Thatcher, | 0:29:55 | 0:29:59 | |
and is Cameron really suggesting that the people of Liverpool, | 0:29:59 | 0:30:03 | |
Yorkshire, the miners, are Thatcherites | 0:30:03 | 0:30:06 | |
because he's seriously, seriously deluded. | 0:30:06 | 0:30:09 | |
All right, I think we might... | 0:30:09 | 0:30:12 | |
Don't you think, though, in a funny way, they are | 0:30:12 | 0:30:14 | |
because they seem to be unable to forget Mrs Thatcher, | 0:30:14 | 0:30:17 | |
just as Michael doesn't seem to be able to forget her either. | 0:30:17 | 0:30:20 | |
I just think, to a certain extent, we do have to try | 0:30:20 | 0:30:22 | |
and bury the past, move on and accept that what we've done is move... | 0:30:22 | 0:30:27 | |
One thing that is good that has happened, in a strange way, | 0:30:27 | 0:30:29 | |
is we have moved more slightly more to the middle | 0:30:29 | 0:30:32 | |
and it will be a pity if the current economic crisis drives us, | 0:30:32 | 0:30:37 | |
as a nation, into a...a right and left position again. | 0:30:37 | 0:30:43 | |
I think we are debating what works instead of where we stand | 0:30:43 | 0:30:47 | |
in the political spectrum. | 0:30:47 | 0:30:48 | |
We're halfway through, Michael, just a brief comment. | 0:30:48 | 0:30:50 | |
I just want to say a word about Hillsborough | 0:30:50 | 0:30:52 | |
because I care deeply about the, | 0:30:52 | 0:30:55 | |
about the 96 who lost their lives at Hillsborough | 0:30:55 | 0:30:57 | |
and, indeed, I started an investigation internally | 0:30:57 | 0:31:01 | |
when I was Home Secretary, | 0:31:01 | 0:31:02 | |
which ultimately led to the further investigations. | 0:31:02 | 0:31:06 | |
I can tell you this, | 0:31:06 | 0:31:08 | |
that if Margaret Thatcher had known that the police | 0:31:08 | 0:31:12 | |
had behaved as we now know they behaved at Hillsborough, | 0:31:12 | 0:31:17 | |
she would have been at least as deeply shocked | 0:31:17 | 0:31:21 | |
as you, sir, and as I. | 0:31:21 | 0:31:23 | |
OK. Do you want to have a say? Go on then. | 0:31:23 | 0:31:27 | |
I was just going to say, do you not think that, | 0:31:27 | 0:31:29 | |
regardless of, sort of, separate beliefs and everything, | 0:31:29 | 0:31:31 | |
do you not think that still, like, for our, sort of, figurehead, | 0:31:31 | 0:31:34 | |
our country's image, do you not think that | 0:31:34 | 0:31:36 | |
that was a ridiculously, kind of, inflammatory thing to say | 0:31:36 | 0:31:39 | |
at a time when the country is so divided? | 0:31:39 | 0:31:41 | |
-What, for David Cameron to say? -Yeah. | 0:31:41 | 0:31:44 | |
It was, I actually haven't had the chance to answer this question | 0:31:44 | 0:31:47 | |
so, very quickly, I think it was, I agree with you, I think | 0:31:47 | 0:31:49 | |
it was a little bit silly. | 0:31:49 | 0:31:50 | |
He should not have gone on your show and given an interview | 0:31:50 | 0:31:53 | |
which looked as though he was trying to capitalise | 0:31:53 | 0:31:55 | |
upon Lady Thatcher's death... | 0:31:55 | 0:31:56 | |
It wasn't to me, it was on the radio. | 0:31:56 | 0:31:59 | |
Oh, I apologise, I thought everything great appeared on your show! | 0:31:59 | 0:32:02 | |
It does but he said other things... | 0:32:02 | 0:32:05 | |
But he said that we were all Thatcherites now, we're not. | 0:32:05 | 0:32:07 | |
I think Andrew Marr got it right with the History Of The World show | 0:32:07 | 0:32:10 | |
when he said we're Thatcher's children cos we are products of it | 0:32:10 | 0:32:13 | |
but not all children like their mothers. | 0:32:13 | 0:32:15 | |
-Right. Let's go on. -LAUGHTER | 0:32:15 | 0:32:19 | |
Lucy Ivey, a question from you, please. | 0:32:19 | 0:32:22 | |
Should vaccinations for children be compulsory? | 0:32:22 | 0:32:25 | |
Should vaccinations for children be compulsory? | 0:32:25 | 0:32:27 | |
This, of course, in the light of what's going on in Wales | 0:32:27 | 0:32:29 | |
with a number of people who have not been vaccinated | 0:32:29 | 0:32:31 | |
and are getting measles, and it is compulsory in some countries - | 0:32:31 | 0:32:36 | |
in the United States, in particular. | 0:32:36 | 0:32:38 | |
Should it be compulsory here? Griff Rhys Jones? | 0:32:38 | 0:32:41 | |
No, I don't think it should be compulsory | 0:32:41 | 0:32:43 | |
but I think we are facing a difficult thing with self-diagnosis. | 0:32:43 | 0:32:48 | |
It's complicated for me. | 0:32:48 | 0:32:50 | |
My father was a doctor and he hated watching Dr Kildare. | 0:32:50 | 0:32:54 | |
He wouldn't allow us to watch it because the following day, | 0:32:54 | 0:32:57 | |
you're all, many of you, too young even to remember Dr Kildare, | 0:32:57 | 0:33:01 | |
but the following, it's probably the same with Casualty, | 0:33:01 | 0:33:04 | |
the following day his patients would arrive exhibiting exactly | 0:33:04 | 0:33:07 | |
the same symptoms as they had seen in the programme. | 0:33:07 | 0:33:11 | |
And I think what happened here was tragic and bad, | 0:33:11 | 0:33:16 | |
and that is that a media debate started on the basis of some | 0:33:16 | 0:33:21 | |
rather dodgy evidence which would have been better discussed | 0:33:21 | 0:33:26 | |
by clinicians in the safety of their own hospital. | 0:33:26 | 0:33:29 | |
And we've had another scare with, with the heart centre in Leeds, | 0:33:29 | 0:33:36 | |
which was similarly discussed in the papers. | 0:33:36 | 0:33:39 | |
The evidence, which should have been left to doctors to discuss privately, | 0:33:39 | 0:33:45 | |
became a public issue. | 0:33:45 | 0:33:47 | |
When these things happen people naturally become scared | 0:33:47 | 0:33:51 | |
and I think that's a pity. | 0:33:51 | 0:33:53 | |
I was brought up to trust doctors and, to a certain extent, we should. | 0:33:53 | 0:33:58 | |
Very difficult sometimes because it's also true to say that there have | 0:33:58 | 0:34:01 | |
been some terrible public health scares and, particularly, | 0:34:01 | 0:34:04 | |
in the 19th century where it was newspapers that led the way. | 0:34:04 | 0:34:08 | |
But the idea behind this is that in the United States | 0:34:08 | 0:34:12 | |
it's seen as a social duty to be vaccinated against measles | 0:34:12 | 0:34:16 | |
because if you're not your child is going to give it to another child, | 0:34:16 | 0:34:19 | |
or to another child | 0:34:19 | 0:34:20 | |
-and therefore you actually have a social obligation. -Well... | 0:34:20 | 0:34:23 | |
it's complicated because there is an element of personal freedom here | 0:34:23 | 0:34:26 | |
but we also know that the use of antibiotics | 0:34:26 | 0:34:28 | |
is now becoming a really dreadful problem, future problem, | 0:34:28 | 0:34:32 | |
for the world and the idea of not, not using the law to control | 0:34:32 | 0:34:38 | |
the use of medicines is, obviously, becoming very, very complicated. | 0:34:38 | 0:34:42 | |
You, sir, over there. | 0:34:43 | 0:34:45 | |
Like Griff's father, I am also a doctor and I sympathise, | 0:34:45 | 0:34:48 | |
I empathise with his sentiments regarding TV programmes | 0:34:48 | 0:34:51 | |
concerning medicine in hospitals but I would say that | 0:34:51 | 0:34:54 | |
there is no ethical problem with compulsory vaccination. | 0:34:54 | 0:34:57 | |
We already have laws in progress that allow | 0:34:57 | 0:35:00 | |
the detention of people with communicable diseases | 0:35:00 | 0:35:02 | |
who refuse treatment, such as tuberculosis, in hospitals. | 0:35:02 | 0:35:06 | |
Counterbalanced with the severity of diseases like measles, | 0:35:06 | 0:35:09 | |
measles is a killer, | 0:35:09 | 0:35:10 | |
there is absolutely no doubt about that, it kills young children. | 0:35:10 | 0:35:14 | |
For me, there is no ethical problem that would, you know, | 0:35:14 | 0:35:19 | |
prevent me from administering compulsory vaccinations, | 0:35:19 | 0:35:22 | |
when one looks at the severity of the diseases involved. | 0:35:22 | 0:35:26 | |
The reason why we're talking about this | 0:35:26 | 0:35:28 | |
is around, what, ten years ago, a guy called Andrew... | 0:35:28 | 0:35:34 | |
-Wakefield, was it Wakefield? -Yes. | 0:35:34 | 0:35:36 | |
He decided, based on what was some dodgy research, | 0:35:36 | 0:35:39 | |
that there was a link between the MMR vaccination... | 0:35:39 | 0:35:41 | |
We know about that cos Griff was talking about that. | 0:35:41 | 0:35:44 | |
Yeah, but just, you know, | 0:35:44 | 0:35:46 | |
the guy has been found to be completely wrong, | 0:35:46 | 0:35:48 | |
he was struck off by the GMC | 0:35:48 | 0:35:50 | |
and he's somewhere in America now doing something else | 0:35:50 | 0:35:52 | |
but the truth, the result of this, is a combination of what he's said, | 0:35:52 | 0:35:56 | |
I'm afraid a combination of the influence of sections of the press, | 0:35:56 | 0:36:00 | |
I'm afraid, including the Daily Mail, and some politicians as well. | 0:36:00 | 0:36:04 | |
We had around 70 cases, I think, ten years ago, of measles, a year, | 0:36:04 | 0:36:09 | |
it is now up at around 2,000 | 0:36:09 | 0:36:11 | |
and what we are seeing is the consequences | 0:36:11 | 0:36:14 | |
of people not getting their children vaccinated, | 0:36:14 | 0:36:17 | |
who were scared into doing it, and, therefore, a number of children | 0:36:17 | 0:36:20 | |
in Wales and elsewhere now are suffering.... | 0:36:20 | 0:36:22 | |
But that is the background, what about the question, | 0:36:22 | 0:36:25 | |
which was, should they be made to be vaccinated compulsorily? | 0:36:25 | 0:36:27 | |
Well, the point about the question is this is that in America | 0:36:27 | 0:36:30 | |
people aren't forced to vaccinate | 0:36:30 | 0:36:32 | |
because there's a difference between saying you have to vaccinate | 0:36:32 | 0:36:35 | |
and saying if your child isn't vaccinated | 0:36:35 | 0:36:37 | |
you can't come into a public school. There is a difference in that. | 0:36:37 | 0:36:39 | |
-Is there a real difference? -I think there is... | 0:36:39 | 0:36:41 | |
Not for most people, surely, because you can't educate your children. | 0:36:41 | 0:36:45 | |
You are giving a choice to someone not to vaccinate | 0:36:45 | 0:36:47 | |
but there are consequences with that. | 0:36:47 | 0:36:48 | |
But we used to have very high rates of vaccination | 0:36:48 | 0:36:51 | |
and the reason why they've dipped | 0:36:51 | 0:36:53 | |
is because of the scare stories that were put around about MMR. | 0:36:53 | 0:36:56 | |
Even people, for example, | 0:36:56 | 0:36:58 | |
who suggested that we should have single jabs. | 0:36:58 | 0:37:01 | |
There was an inference in that | 0:37:01 | 0:37:02 | |
that there was something wrong with the vaccination... | 0:37:02 | 0:37:05 | |
But I'm interested in your view about the ethics | 0:37:05 | 0:37:07 | |
of saying to people. | 0:37:07 | 0:37:08 | |
You say in the States you're only banned from public education. | 0:37:08 | 0:37:11 | |
-So, you can go around the streets and still... -Yes, that's right. | 0:37:11 | 0:37:14 | |
-That's right. -So, it seems a rather weird thing to do | 0:37:14 | 0:37:17 | |
because you're not protected by going to a public school. | 0:37:17 | 0:37:19 | |
What I'm trying to clarify here, David, it is not compulsory | 0:37:19 | 0:37:23 | |
but you're not allowed admission to areas where it could put | 0:37:23 | 0:37:25 | |
children most at risk. And that's the public school system. | 0:37:25 | 0:37:28 | |
What I'm saying is, is that it is fair to have a debate about that. | 0:37:28 | 0:37:31 | |
I'm not sure if that is the answer. | 0:37:31 | 0:37:34 | |
I think the answer is to get back to where we were, | 0:37:34 | 0:37:36 | |
which was high rates of take-up in every community in our country | 0:37:36 | 0:37:40 | |
that brought measles down to 70 a year | 0:37:40 | 0:37:42 | |
and was going down even further but as a result of the scaremongering, | 0:37:42 | 0:37:46 | |
as a result of newspapers being irresponsible, | 0:37:46 | 0:37:49 | |
and other individuals, | 0:37:49 | 0:37:50 | |
a whole generation of kids did not get vaccinated, | 0:37:50 | 0:37:53 | |
and it put a whole number of other people at risk. | 0:37:53 | 0:37:55 | |
Can I just say, this absolutely infuriates me. | 0:37:55 | 0:37:58 | |
This is the reason it is up to, it is a newspaper's responsibility, | 0:37:58 | 0:38:02 | |
and I'm proud that the Daily Mail takes this very seriously, | 0:38:02 | 0:38:04 | |
to report the facts. | 0:38:04 | 0:38:06 | |
You know, there was a man who claimed... | 0:38:06 | 0:38:09 | |
-LAUGHTER -He was struck off! | 0:38:09 | 0:38:10 | |
He was struck off by the GMC! | 0:38:10 | 0:38:12 | |
We hear at the time that he made these claims | 0:38:14 | 0:38:16 | |
-they were taken as credible... -By the Daily Mail. | 0:38:16 | 0:38:20 | |
That is ridiculous, they were taken by everyone, Caroline, | 0:38:20 | 0:38:23 | |
don't be silly, darling. It makes you just sounds silly to say that. | 0:38:23 | 0:38:27 | |
It was run by every single... | 0:38:27 | 0:38:29 | |
can you just let me finish for a second | 0:38:29 | 0:38:31 | |
because you've been quite having a good time today. | 0:38:31 | 0:38:33 | |
And who was, there was one person who could have stood up, | 0:38:33 | 0:38:37 | |
and we asked again and again, | 0:38:37 | 0:38:39 | |
"Could you please just say that you are sure that this jab is safe | 0:38:39 | 0:38:43 | |
"and that you will give it to your son," and that man was Tony Blair. | 0:38:43 | 0:38:46 | |
-You misunderstand science. -Excuse me, let me just finished. | 0:38:46 | 0:38:50 | |
He refused to say whether or not he would give his own son the jab... | 0:38:50 | 0:38:53 | |
That was an immoral question to ask him. | 0:38:53 | 0:38:56 | |
..that could have doused the whole argument. | 0:38:56 | 0:38:58 | |
I'm sorry, but to suggest that people, public figures, | 0:38:58 | 0:39:00 | |
should have to talk about what they give their children | 0:39:00 | 0:39:03 | |
-is completely... -..crisis... -No, no, you, your newspaper. -..800 people. | 0:39:03 | 0:39:08 | |
Your newspaper helped to create the crisis | 0:39:08 | 0:39:10 | |
and you can't walk away from that. | 0:39:10 | 0:39:11 | |
Darlings, have we learned our lesson? That's what I want to know. | 0:39:11 | 0:39:15 | |
Now we've had the argument, have we learnt the lesson? | 0:39:15 | 0:39:18 | |
It's newspapers' jobs to report... | 0:39:18 | 0:39:20 | |
One at a time, please. I'm going back to the doctor, yes? | 0:39:20 | 0:39:23 | |
It's just regrettable that Amanda Platell's paper, | 0:39:23 | 0:39:26 | |
their version of the facts there is very little evidence of very little, | 0:39:26 | 0:39:30 | |
kind of, agreement with the actual science behind the vaccinations. | 0:39:30 | 0:39:33 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:39:33 | 0:39:35 | |
And is the Daily Mail the only newspaper you read, sir? | 0:39:35 | 0:39:38 | |
It was covered by all newspapers and, in fact, | 0:39:38 | 0:39:40 | |
the biggest one that's been laid to blame is one of the local newspapers, | 0:39:40 | 0:39:43 | |
which I think is completely unfair. | 0:39:43 | 0:39:45 | |
With hindsight, do you regret the scale of coverage | 0:39:45 | 0:39:48 | |
that the Mail gave it and, it has to be said, | 0:39:48 | 0:39:50 | |
it has to be said, some parts of the BBC covered this too. | 0:39:50 | 0:39:52 | |
Look, nobody knew whether or not this was dangerous, nobody knew | 0:39:52 | 0:39:57 | |
and if ever there's a health issue, | 0:39:57 | 0:39:59 | |
you know, people dying on the Liverpool Pathway, | 0:39:59 | 0:40:01 | |
the elderly not being treated in hospitals, | 0:40:01 | 0:40:04 | |
we see it as our duty to report that. | 0:40:04 | 0:40:06 | |
OK, hold on, you, sir, and then I'll come. All right. Yes? | 0:40:06 | 0:40:10 | |
You said it was the newspaper's job to report the facts. | 0:40:10 | 0:40:13 | |
The newspaper's job, at the end of the day, is to sell papers. | 0:40:13 | 0:40:15 | |
So, what you're doing isn't necessarily going to be fact. | 0:40:15 | 0:40:18 | |
You're going to twist it to what ever way | 0:40:18 | 0:40:20 | |
-is going to make you sell the most copies. -All right. | 0:40:20 | 0:40:22 | |
-I think the Daily Mail has, kind of, perfected that. -APPLAUSE | 0:40:22 | 0:40:26 | |
Let's go away from the Daily Mail, for the moment, | 0:40:26 | 0:40:29 | |
and come to the issue, Sarah Teather, | 0:40:29 | 0:40:31 | |
should vaccinations for children be compulsory | 0:40:31 | 0:40:33 | |
-and forget the history, for a moment. -OK. | 0:40:33 | 0:40:35 | |
I mean, I'm not in favour of compulsory medication. | 0:40:35 | 0:40:38 | |
I think if you start down that road I, you know, | 0:40:38 | 0:40:40 | |
goodness knows where an earth it will end. | 0:40:40 | 0:40:42 | |
If you're going to deal with this we need to actually understand science | 0:40:42 | 0:40:45 | |
and a lot of the problem with this debate, I'm afraid, Amanda, | 0:40:45 | 0:40:48 | |
you're falling back into the same trap. | 0:40:48 | 0:40:50 | |
I mean, to ask Tony Blair | 0:40:50 | 0:40:51 | |
to say categorically whether something is safe. | 0:40:51 | 0:40:53 | |
Apart from the fact that you're putting a man and his child | 0:40:53 | 0:40:56 | |
into the public, which is just completely unacceptable, | 0:40:56 | 0:40:59 | |
whichever party you're in, | 0:40:59 | 0:41:00 | |
you have to think that that is completely unacceptable | 0:41:00 | 0:41:03 | |
but, also, science doesn't proceed like that. | 0:41:03 | 0:41:05 | |
Science proceeds on the basis of risk and the problem with newspapers | 0:41:05 | 0:41:08 | |
is that they report things as polarities. | 0:41:08 | 0:41:10 | |
It's either completely safe or completely dangerous and that... | 0:41:10 | 0:41:13 | |
That is so not true, Sarah, I'm sorry, it shows, darling, | 0:41:13 | 0:41:16 | |
it shows, actually, that you're not a regular reader of the Daily Mail | 0:41:16 | 0:41:19 | |
during that period. | 0:41:19 | 0:41:21 | |
LAUGHTER That's possibly true but I am also a scientist | 0:41:21 | 0:41:24 | |
and I did work for an organisation | 0:41:24 | 0:41:26 | |
that, for quite a long time, tried to make sure, | 0:41:26 | 0:41:28 | |
I worked for the Royal Society a long time before I was elected, | 0:41:28 | 0:41:30 | |
and one of the big things we were involved in | 0:41:30 | 0:41:32 | |
was talking about science advice, | 0:41:32 | 0:41:34 | |
and the problem is people don't understand | 0:41:34 | 0:41:35 | |
the scientific information they have, they don't know how to interpret it. | 0:41:35 | 0:41:39 | |
So, this type of thing happens over and over, and over again. | 0:41:39 | 0:41:41 | |
So, to answer Griff's problem, | 0:41:41 | 0:41:43 | |
we haven't learned our lessons, I don't think. | 0:41:43 | 0:41:46 | |
We see scares all the time on the front page of newspapers | 0:41:46 | 0:41:49 | |
with one report with half a dozen people treated as if this is true | 0:41:49 | 0:41:53 | |
when, in fact, scientific information just doesn't proceed like that. | 0:41:53 | 0:41:57 | |
That this man a charlatan, wasn't he? | 0:41:57 | 0:41:59 | |
They decided, in the end, that he had behaved dishonestly | 0:41:59 | 0:42:02 | |
-and irresponsibly. -Indeed. -So, how could the Daily Mail know that? | 0:42:02 | 0:42:06 | |
How could anybody know that | 0:42:06 | 0:42:07 | |
until the thing had spent two or three years... | 0:42:07 | 0:42:09 | |
It was a tiny study that was published in the Lancet | 0:42:09 | 0:42:13 | |
-but, of course... -The Lancet, the goodness sake! | 0:42:13 | 0:42:15 | |
Let me finish, David, let me finish, let me finish. | 0:42:15 | 0:42:18 | |
But the claims he made were not made in the Lancet | 0:42:18 | 0:42:21 | |
they were made at a press conference later. | 0:42:21 | 0:42:24 | |
You know, you can't just, I think we need to have, | 0:42:24 | 0:42:26 | |
what would be really helpful is if something like this, | 0:42:26 | 0:42:28 | |
if everybody reflected on what's happened. | 0:42:28 | 0:42:30 | |
We have 800 cases, we're lucky, at the moment, nobody has died. | 0:42:30 | 0:42:34 | |
If people reflected on, | 0:42:34 | 0:42:35 | |
and scientists and newspaper journalists came together, | 0:42:35 | 0:42:38 | |
and had a proper sensible discussion | 0:42:38 | 0:42:40 | |
about how we report scientific facts... | 0:42:40 | 0:42:42 | |
But there isn't an issue now about MMR, the question, now, | 0:42:42 | 0:42:44 | |
-and you're against compulsory vaccination. -I am against. | 0:42:44 | 0:42:47 | |
I want to go to the woman up there | 0:42:47 | 0:42:48 | |
and then I will come to you, Michael Howard. Yes? | 0:42:48 | 0:42:50 | |
I did a little bit of research around the MMR when my daughter | 0:42:50 | 0:42:53 | |
had to have it and I did decide to give it to her | 0:42:53 | 0:42:56 | |
but I did also come across some information | 0:42:56 | 0:42:58 | |
about the possibility of changing the ages at which the children | 0:42:58 | 0:43:03 | |
receive their jabs so that it didn't coincide with the age that | 0:43:03 | 0:43:07 | |
autism also began to appear in young children, | 0:43:07 | 0:43:11 | |
so that we could, you know, effectively see and, you know, | 0:43:11 | 0:43:14 | |
put up some research for parents saying, "Look, we've changed | 0:43:14 | 0:43:18 | |
"the ages where be given the MMR to children and there is, you know, | 0:43:18 | 0:43:21 | |
-"we can categorically prove..." -There is just no link with autism. | 0:43:21 | 0:43:24 | |
No, that's not the point she's making, the point is there was, | 0:43:24 | 0:43:27 | |
there was an apparent coincidence of autism and MMR. | 0:43:27 | 0:43:30 | |
That's what lots of people said and if we, somehow, give them... | 0:43:30 | 0:43:32 | |
Separate, we could then see... | 0:43:32 | 0:43:34 | |
Yeah, separate them and give people, sort of, unequivocal proof | 0:43:34 | 0:43:37 | |
that these two events happened separately, | 0:43:37 | 0:43:39 | |
I think a lot more parents might be happy. | 0:43:39 | 0:43:41 | |
And are you in favour of compulsory vaccination? | 0:43:41 | 0:43:44 | |
-I mean, you say you've vaccinated your children. -I don't know, | 0:43:44 | 0:43:47 | |
I, sort of, in a protective nature towards my own daughter, | 0:43:47 | 0:43:50 | |
I'd, sort of, say, yes, | 0:43:50 | 0:43:51 | |
I'd want as many children to be protected as possible | 0:43:51 | 0:43:54 | |
but then I also have a slight moral issue with compelling people | 0:43:54 | 0:43:59 | |
-to vaccinate their children against their will. -Michael Howard. | 0:43:59 | 0:44:02 | |
It is absurd, in this context, to demonise the Daily Mail. | 0:44:02 | 0:44:07 | |
This controversy was covered by almost every newspaper, | 0:44:07 | 0:44:11 | |
it was covered extensively on the BBC | 0:44:11 | 0:44:14 | |
and it continued to rage for quite a long time, | 0:44:14 | 0:44:18 | |
despite the fact that Yvette Cooper, to her credit, | 0:44:18 | 0:44:21 | |
who I think was Health Minister at the time, said that she had | 0:44:21 | 0:44:24 | |
arranged for her children to be vaccinated. | 0:44:24 | 0:44:28 | |
So, it was a controversy and, in an ideal world, Sarah, | 0:44:28 | 0:44:31 | |
things would happen as you've described | 0:44:31 | 0:44:33 | |
but they're never going to happen like that | 0:44:33 | 0:44:35 | |
-because when controversies... -We could improve things a bit... | 0:44:35 | 0:44:38 | |
..when controversies arise you must expect the media to cover them. | 0:44:38 | 0:44:41 | |
That was in the past. | 0:44:41 | 0:44:44 | |
I agree with those who have said | 0:44:44 | 0:44:46 | |
that it would be wrong to make it compulsory, I agree with Caroline, | 0:44:46 | 0:44:51 | |
what you've got to try and do is get back to a situation | 0:44:51 | 0:44:55 | |
where, on an entirely voluntary basis, | 0:44:55 | 0:44:57 | |
the overwhelming majority of parents arranged for their children | 0:44:57 | 0:45:02 | |
to have the vaccine and I hope we can get back to that, | 0:45:02 | 0:45:05 | |
the sooner the better. | 0:45:05 | 0:45:07 | |
You, sir. | 0:45:07 | 0:45:08 | |
I never thought I'd find myself agreeing with a Liberal Democrat | 0:45:08 | 0:45:12 | |
but, at the end of the day, surely, the natural conclusion for things | 0:45:12 | 0:45:15 | |
that are this important, that are best understood by scientists, | 0:45:15 | 0:45:19 | |
is that scientists and doctors should make the decision | 0:45:19 | 0:45:22 | |
and, as a result of that, don't you agree that the natural conclusion | 0:45:22 | 0:45:26 | |
is that compulsory vaccination is the way forward, | 0:45:26 | 0:45:28 | |
and if we had compulsory vaccination | 0:45:28 | 0:45:30 | |
measles would be something we were discussing in the history. | 0:45:30 | 0:45:33 | |
I don't think you can abdicate | 0:45:33 | 0:45:34 | |
all of the role of a politician to a scientist, | 0:45:34 | 0:45:36 | |
that's not what I was, actually, arguing, | 0:45:36 | 0:45:38 | |
-politicians still need to make decisions. -The woman at the back. | 0:45:38 | 0:45:41 | |
But we need to understand the advice. | 0:45:41 | 0:45:43 | |
I don't think politicians always understand advice from scientists. | 0:45:43 | 0:45:46 | |
The woman at the back, then you, sir, then we'll go on. | 0:45:46 | 0:45:48 | |
I'm a new parent so I've just been through this process myself, | 0:45:48 | 0:45:51 | |
of vaccinations, | 0:45:51 | 0:45:53 | |
and I can say you're given a lot of information about the vaccinations. | 0:45:53 | 0:45:57 | |
You know, so you know what you're doing | 0:45:57 | 0:45:59 | |
and I personally believe that getting your child vaccinated | 0:45:59 | 0:46:02 | |
is the responsible thing to do and I want to make sure there's, | 0:46:02 | 0:46:07 | |
any risks I can get rid of for my child I can. | 0:46:07 | 0:46:09 | |
So, if the parents of other children, your neighbours, | 0:46:09 | 0:46:13 | |
weren't vaccinating their children | 0:46:13 | 0:46:15 | |
would you think they should be compelled to? | 0:46:15 | 0:46:17 | |
No, I think you should want to do what is best for your child. | 0:46:17 | 0:46:20 | |
I know that's an ideal world and I think getting your child vaccinated | 0:46:20 | 0:46:24 | |
is the best thing to do for your child | 0:46:24 | 0:46:26 | |
but I'm uncomfortable with the idea of the state forcing parents | 0:46:26 | 0:46:31 | |
into a decision if they have a moral objection. | 0:46:31 | 0:46:35 | |
I can't imagine what it would be like to have your child taken away | 0:46:35 | 0:46:38 | |
and vaccinated against your will, I think that would be wrong. | 0:46:38 | 0:46:41 | |
Your child, once vaccinated, is protected anyway | 0:46:41 | 0:46:43 | |
so the issue barely arises. Over there, yes. | 0:46:43 | 0:46:46 | |
I agree with the gentleman earlier on. He said that we have | 0:46:46 | 0:46:50 | |
lots of different rules that are for the good of the community, | 0:46:50 | 0:46:53 | |
-you know, rules of the road, national curriculum... -Seat belts? | 0:46:53 | 0:46:58 | |
Seat belts. I see this as no different, | 0:46:58 | 0:47:00 | |
for the good of the community, | 0:47:00 | 0:47:03 | |
-vaccinations like this should be compulsory. -OK. | 0:47:03 | 0:47:07 | |
You were going to pick me up on one point | 0:47:07 | 0:47:10 | |
I said that if her child is vaccinated it's safe. | 0:47:10 | 0:47:13 | |
If there are a large numbers of people who aren't vaccinated | 0:47:13 | 0:47:16 | |
that can still have an impact, in terms of these diseases, | 0:47:16 | 0:47:19 | |
on those who are and there are some people - | 0:47:19 | 0:47:21 | |
and I was talking to someone today who knows someone who's got | 0:47:21 | 0:47:24 | |
a small child who's got leukaemia, | 0:47:24 | 0:47:26 | |
they can't, because of their leukaemia, get vaccinated | 0:47:26 | 0:47:29 | |
so they are not protected. | 0:47:29 | 0:47:30 | |
The herd immunity protects those people as well | 0:47:30 | 0:47:33 | |
and this is why these things are so important. | 0:47:33 | 0:47:36 | |
It actually brings it together, collectively, | 0:47:36 | 0:47:39 | |
in collective responsibility together | 0:47:39 | 0:47:41 | |
and we need to make sure that, actually, you know, | 0:47:41 | 0:47:43 | |
last time round there were many, many, many more doctors | 0:47:43 | 0:47:47 | |
and scientists saying, "It's safe, stick with the MMR," | 0:47:47 | 0:47:50 | |
and we allowed an individual and a couple of others | 0:47:50 | 0:47:52 | |
-to take us off course. -OK, thank you. | 0:47:52 | 0:47:55 | |
Hannah Martin, please. | 0:47:55 | 0:47:56 | |
Does the threat from North Korea justify Trident? | 0:47:56 | 0:48:00 | |
Does the threat from North Korea | 0:48:00 | 0:48:03 | |
justify keeping the Trident missile system? | 0:48:03 | 0:48:07 | |
Who'd like to start on this? | 0:48:07 | 0:48:09 | |
Griff Rhys Jones. | 0:48:09 | 0:48:11 | |
Thank you(!) | 0:48:11 | 0:48:12 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:48:12 | 0:48:14 | |
Erm...we are, in a funny way, | 0:48:14 | 0:48:17 | |
seeing the downside of the nuclear deterrent here | 0:48:17 | 0:48:22 | |
because it's complicated, in as much as we live in a world | 0:48:22 | 0:48:28 | |
which has been protected by these fearful weapons. | 0:48:28 | 0:48:32 | |
But if we look back to the end of the Second World War, historically... | 0:48:32 | 0:48:36 | |
..had Adolf Hitler had nuclear weapons | 0:48:37 | 0:48:43 | |
he would have used them indiscriminately | 0:48:43 | 0:48:46 | |
because he was madman, and, to a certain extent, | 0:48:46 | 0:48:49 | |
he believed at the end of the war that the German people had failed | 0:48:49 | 0:48:52 | |
and he wanted to take them, | 0:48:52 | 0:48:54 | |
and the rest of the world, down with him if he could. | 0:48:54 | 0:48:58 | |
And one of the problems about such dangerous weaponry | 0:48:59 | 0:49:02 | |
is that in the hands of people who are failing to rule their country, | 0:49:02 | 0:49:08 | |
and they are a failing regime, in North Korea, | 0:49:08 | 0:49:11 | |
they become increasingly dangerous. | 0:49:11 | 0:49:14 | |
Whether Trident will stop them ultimately taking some ghastly | 0:49:14 | 0:49:20 | |
and terrible action is not necessarily any more true. | 0:49:20 | 0:49:25 | |
I mean, in a way, it's a weapon which we know we SHOULD believe in | 0:49:25 | 0:49:33 | |
to protect us from a sort of sense of mutual destruction, | 0:49:33 | 0:49:37 | |
and to say that it hasn't is to misunderstand the post-war world | 0:49:37 | 0:49:43 | |
because, in a funny way, we have avoided really, | 0:49:43 | 0:49:45 | |
we've had a lot of war but we've avoided really major, | 0:49:45 | 0:49:49 | |
major wars, like the Second World War, | 0:49:49 | 0:49:51 | |
in which 68 million people, it's now estimated, died... | 0:49:51 | 0:49:56 | |
..and, under those circumstances, it's an important thing. | 0:49:58 | 0:50:02 | |
For us to have as well as the United States to have? | 0:50:02 | 0:50:04 | |
Yes, yes, I believe so. | 0:50:04 | 0:50:05 | |
Michael Howard, because Michael Portillo, | 0:50:05 | 0:50:08 | |
the former Defence Secretary of the Conservative government, | 0:50:08 | 0:50:10 | |
said, "It's absurd to believe the United Kingdom | 0:50:10 | 0:50:12 | |
"would use nuclear weapons against North Korea. | 0:50:12 | 0:50:15 | |
"If anyone's going to do it and provide a deterrent | 0:50:15 | 0:50:17 | |
"it's the United States." Do you agree with that? | 0:50:17 | 0:50:19 | |
I don't think that's quite the point. | 0:50:19 | 0:50:21 | |
The point is that we live in an extraordinarily uncertain world | 0:50:21 | 0:50:24 | |
in which you cannot predict every eventuality that might occur. | 0:50:24 | 0:50:29 | |
But let me, let me give you a hypothetical example. | 0:50:29 | 0:50:34 | |
Erm, we... | 0:50:34 | 0:50:35 | |
..take it upon ourselves... | 0:50:37 | 0:50:38 | |
..normally together with other countries, | 0:50:39 | 0:50:42 | |
to be preferred to intervene in certain circumstances | 0:50:42 | 0:50:46 | |
for what you regard as humanitarian reasons. | 0:50:46 | 0:50:49 | |
We did it most recently, together with the French, in Libya. | 0:50:49 | 0:50:56 | |
Now, if Libya had still had nuclear weapons... | 0:50:56 | 0:51:01 | |
..then some people might have thought | 0:51:04 | 0:51:06 | |
that Colonel Gaddafi might been prepared to use them, | 0:51:06 | 0:51:10 | |
in those circumstances. | 0:51:10 | 0:51:11 | |
I don't think he would have been prepared to use them, why? | 0:51:11 | 0:51:15 | |
Because he knew that we and the French had them. | 0:51:15 | 0:51:19 | |
And you cannot discount the possibility that we might, | 0:51:19 | 0:51:22 | |
for the very best of reasons, for humanitarian reasons, | 0:51:22 | 0:51:26 | |
want to intervene in a part of the world which was within | 0:51:26 | 0:51:30 | |
reach of North Korea's nuclear arsenal... | 0:51:30 | 0:51:33 | |
..and we might be deterred from intervening. | 0:51:35 | 0:51:40 | |
And achieving those humanitarian objectives, | 0:51:40 | 0:51:43 | |
if they had those nuclear weapons, and we didn't. | 0:51:43 | 0:51:46 | |
And so you've got to take into account the enormous uncertainty | 0:51:46 | 0:51:50 | |
of the world in which we live, | 0:51:50 | 0:51:52 | |
the fact that we can't predict | 0:51:52 | 0:51:54 | |
all the likely situations that might arise | 0:51:54 | 0:51:56 | |
and that's why I believe we do need to keep our nuclear deterrent. | 0:51:56 | 0:52:00 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:52:01 | 0:52:03 | |
Yes, to you. | 0:52:05 | 0:52:07 | |
I see the problem at the moment, | 0:52:07 | 0:52:09 | |
with maintaining independent deterrents, | 0:52:09 | 0:52:12 | |
is that, well, the problem is cost, mainly | 0:52:12 | 0:52:16 | |
because it's highly expensive to develop, say, the submarines | 0:52:16 | 0:52:20 | |
which we do, there are other ways you could do it, but at high cost... | 0:52:20 | 0:52:24 | |
I do agree with Michael on this point | 0:52:24 | 0:52:26 | |
that you can't predict the world. | 0:52:26 | 0:52:28 | |
We've seen this with the Arab Spring, | 0:52:28 | 0:52:30 | |
lots of countries changing into ways | 0:52:30 | 0:52:32 | |
which we probably wouldn't like them to, | 0:52:32 | 0:52:35 | |
such as we've seen in Egypt, lots of problems rising up there. | 0:52:35 | 0:52:38 | |
We've seen, mainly in North Africa and so on. | 0:52:38 | 0:52:41 | |
It's important to maintain it but another point on North Korea, | 0:52:41 | 0:52:44 | |
North Korea is, will probably never use it. | 0:52:44 | 0:52:48 | |
They are just trying to join this club of nuclear nations | 0:52:48 | 0:52:51 | |
where they can try and be respected | 0:52:51 | 0:52:53 | |
but when their friends down south are more economic prospects. | 0:52:53 | 0:52:58 | |
I think it was quoted, | 0:52:58 | 0:53:00 | |
it was something the Prime Minister said, that it was an example, | 0:53:00 | 0:53:03 | |
a good example of why you might need a nuclear deterrent. | 0:53:03 | 0:53:06 | |
Sarah Teather? | 0:53:06 | 0:53:07 | |
I mean, I'm not convinced that North Korea is the main threat | 0:53:07 | 0:53:10 | |
to our security. | 0:53:10 | 0:53:11 | |
I think the main threat to our security is, is terrorism | 0:53:11 | 0:53:14 | |
and it's all sorts of random groups around the world and, for that, | 0:53:14 | 0:53:19 | |
Trident is very poorly equipped. | 0:53:19 | 0:53:21 | |
It is phenomenally expensive, as the gentleman here just said, | 0:53:21 | 0:53:26 | |
and, funnily enough, listening to what Michael was saying about, | 0:53:26 | 0:53:30 | |
about Libya, I, kind of, drew a different conclusion, actually. | 0:53:30 | 0:53:33 | |
I fear that we just end up in an arms race, really, | 0:53:33 | 0:53:37 | |
and that countries with rogue, you know, | 0:53:37 | 0:53:40 | |
rogue governments think that the best way to protect themselves | 0:53:40 | 0:53:43 | |
is to get nuclear weapons | 0:53:43 | 0:53:45 | |
and the argument which is going, kind of, round and round and round | 0:53:45 | 0:53:48 | |
and round, that if they have nuclear weapons we need more nuclear weapons. | 0:53:48 | 0:53:51 | |
And I wonder whether or not this is, actually, | 0:53:51 | 0:53:53 | |
a particularly sensible use of money at the time. | 0:53:53 | 0:53:56 | |
I mean, we've had a debate all evening, on and off, | 0:53:56 | 0:53:58 | |
it's been the undercurrent of what we've been talking about | 0:53:58 | 0:54:01 | |
has been about the financial difficulties we have in this country, | 0:54:01 | 0:54:04 | |
and with what money we have, | 0:54:04 | 0:54:05 | |
I wonder whether we might be better protecting ourselves in other ways | 0:54:05 | 0:54:08 | |
and thinking about how to protect ourselves, | 0:54:08 | 0:54:10 | |
particularly, against terrorism. APPLAUSE | 0:54:10 | 0:54:13 | |
You, sir, at the back, there. Yes? | 0:54:13 | 0:54:16 | |
Sarah, I agree with your point around terrorism | 0:54:16 | 0:54:19 | |
but Trident is just part of a whole defence solution | 0:54:19 | 0:54:23 | |
and, surely, it's better to have it and not need it | 0:54:23 | 0:54:26 | |
than need and not have it. | 0:54:26 | 0:54:27 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:54:27 | 0:54:29 | |
Caroline Flint, do you agree with him? | 0:54:32 | 0:54:35 | |
Yeah, I do agree with the last gentleman. | 0:54:35 | 0:54:37 | |
I mean, the world is very different, in many respects, | 0:54:37 | 0:54:39 | |
from the days of the Cold War where we pointed at them | 0:54:39 | 0:54:42 | |
and they pointed at us, and there seemed to be, | 0:54:42 | 0:54:45 | |
despite everything, certain rules of engagement. | 0:54:45 | 0:54:48 | |
And I think, I remember one senior person in the Army saying, | 0:54:48 | 0:54:51 | |
"Well, when it was the Cold War | 0:54:51 | 0:54:52 | |
"it was like conducting a symphony orchestra, | 0:54:52 | 0:54:54 | |
"since then and all the other things that have occurred, | 0:54:54 | 0:54:56 | |
"in terms of risk, it's more like jazz because you just don't know | 0:54:56 | 0:54:59 | |
"what's going to happen | 0:54:59 | 0:55:01 | |
"and you've got to be prepared for all eventualities." | 0:55:01 | 0:55:03 | |
I think what has happened, | 0:55:03 | 0:55:05 | |
since the end of the Cold War, is that we have seen a reduction, | 0:55:05 | 0:55:08 | |
I think, in the, sort of, stockpile of nuclear warheads | 0:55:08 | 0:55:11 | |
and I welcome that but the truth is I think it's not only | 0:55:11 | 0:55:15 | |
for our benefit but it's also the umbrella with other responsible | 0:55:15 | 0:55:20 | |
nuclear nations that we provide a defence for other countries as well. | 0:55:20 | 0:55:24 | |
And, so, therefore, I think it's just part of what we have to deal with | 0:55:24 | 0:55:27 | |
but you are absolutely right, and so is Sarah, | 0:55:27 | 0:55:29 | |
it isn't the only answer to deal with conflict, | 0:55:29 | 0:55:32 | |
and it certainly isn't the only answer at all | 0:55:32 | 0:55:34 | |
to deal with issues around terrorism that we face today, | 0:55:34 | 0:55:37 | |
and the many forms that that arrives in. | 0:55:37 | 0:55:39 | |
The woman, there, and then I'll come to you, Amanda, | 0:55:39 | 0:55:41 | |
and then I think we'll have to close. Yes, you. | 0:55:41 | 0:55:44 | |
I find there's a real, sort of, loss with what we teach our kids, | 0:55:44 | 0:55:47 | |
to turn the other cheek and to, if a bully hits you, don't hit them back, | 0:55:47 | 0:55:51 | |
and then we hold onto war weapons, and nuclear things, | 0:55:51 | 0:55:55 | |
so, if they do it we can do it. | 0:55:55 | 0:55:57 | |
And it's something that we demonise them for having nuclear weapons | 0:55:57 | 0:56:00 | |
but it's OK because we have it, because we trust ourselves, | 0:56:00 | 0:56:03 | |
and I don't understand this imbalance | 0:56:03 | 0:56:05 | |
-of we're allowed to have it but they're not. -Amanda Platell. | 0:56:05 | 0:56:07 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:56:07 | 0:56:10 | |
I am, unsurprisingly, no nuclear expert | 0:56:10 | 0:56:13 | |
but I completely agree with this gentleman over here. | 0:56:13 | 0:56:16 | |
There's a club out there of countries, some of them reliable, | 0:56:16 | 0:56:19 | |
some of them completely fragile, and I would much rather | 0:56:19 | 0:56:22 | |
-be among the club of the, as you called it, "the nuclear nations." -OK. | 0:56:22 | 0:56:29 | |
I'll take one more point. Who hasn't spoken yet? You haven't, sir. | 0:56:29 | 0:56:32 | |
Briefly, please. | 0:56:32 | 0:56:34 | |
The lady at the end, there, | 0:56:34 | 0:56:35 | |
said she'd rather be in the club of the nuclear nations. | 0:56:35 | 0:56:38 | |
What, including the USA | 0:56:38 | 0:56:39 | |
who has destroyed cities with nuclear weapons? | 0:56:39 | 0:56:42 | |
What sort of club is that? | 0:56:42 | 0:56:44 | |
-Sorry you, what cities is...? -Japan. -In the Second World War? | 0:56:44 | 0:56:48 | |
Yes, in the Second World War. | 0:56:48 | 0:56:50 | |
Right, well, I think this is going to stop. | 0:56:50 | 0:56:52 | |
I know you're very keen to speak. All right. What? | 0:56:52 | 0:56:56 | |
On the last question, I'd like to ask Griff Rhys Jones... | 0:56:56 | 0:57:01 | |
you reckon that Hitler was mad, do you think the same of Harry Truman? | 0:57:01 | 0:57:06 | |
No, I think that what happened was that the use of nuclear weapons | 0:57:07 | 0:57:12 | |
was a restrained use of force at the end of the Second World War. | 0:57:12 | 0:57:17 | |
I think it was an appalling use of force but what that actually... | 0:57:17 | 0:57:22 | |
Both those explosions have effectively put an end | 0:57:22 | 0:57:26 | |
to the use of that weapon, and they have done. | 0:57:26 | 0:57:30 | |
Nobody has, effectively, used another nuclear weapon in anger since that | 0:57:30 | 0:57:34 | |
time and I think, in a way, we bought a level of peace as a result of it. | 0:57:34 | 0:57:38 | |
-All right. -And, although, that may, | 0:57:38 | 0:57:41 | |
that's a totally terrible thing for the world to have achieved | 0:57:41 | 0:57:44 | |
I think that if that happened as a result of those ghastly explosions. | 0:57:44 | 0:57:48 | |
You can't escape the attack. | 0:57:48 | 0:57:50 | |
You cannot escape the attack on innocent men, | 0:57:50 | 0:57:54 | |
women and children - civilians. | 0:57:54 | 0:57:56 | |
There was no need for it at all! | 0:57:56 | 0:57:58 | |
All right. | 0:57:58 | 0:58:00 | |
Time's up, I'm afraid. Thank you for the point. | 0:58:00 | 0:58:03 | |
Next week we're going to be in Worcester | 0:58:03 | 0:58:05 | |
and Nigel Farage is going to be on the panel and Robert Winston, | 0:58:05 | 0:58:09 | |
the scientist, and television presenter. | 0:58:09 | 0:58:12 | |
Everybody seems to be a television presenter these days! | 0:58:12 | 0:58:14 | |
-Anyway, the week after that we're going to be... -It's a club! | 0:58:14 | 0:58:17 | |
It's a club. We're going to be in Dartford, in Kent. | 0:58:17 | 0:58:19 | |
Now, if you'd like to come to either programme, | 0:58:19 | 0:58:21 | |
that's Worcester and Dartford, then go to our website, | 0:58:21 | 0:58:23 | |
the best way of doing it or you can call us... | 0:58:23 | 0:58:25 | |
Let us know your details, we'll get in touch. | 0:58:28 | 0:58:30 | |
Thanks very much to our panel, here, | 0:58:30 | 0:58:32 | |
thank you, all, for coming here to Aldershot. | 0:58:32 | 0:58:35 | |
I know many of you don't live in Aldershot | 0:58:35 | 0:58:37 | |
and have come here especially for this programme. | 0:58:37 | 0:58:39 | |
I'm very grateful to you, we'll see you all again, | 0:58:39 | 0:58:42 | |
those watching at home, next Thursday, I hope. | 0:58:42 | 0:58:44 | |
-From all of this here, good night. -APPLAUSE | 0:58:44 | 0:58:47 | |
Subtitles by Red Bee Media Ltd | 0:59:09 | 0:59:12 |