Browse content similar to 27/11/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
It's Sunday morning and this is the Sunday Politics. | :00:37. | :00:41. | |
Was Fidel Castro a revolutionary hero or a murderous dictator? | :00:42. | :00:45. | |
After the Cuban leader's death, politicians divide over his legacy. | :00:46. | :00:49. | |
Can the NHS in England find billions of pounds' worth of efficiency | :00:50. | :00:54. | |
The Shadow Health Secretary joins me live. | :00:55. | :01:00. | |
Should we have a second Brexit referendum on the terms | :01:01. | :01:02. | |
of the eventual withdrawal deal that's struck with the EU? | :01:03. | :01:07. | |
Former Lib Dem leader Paddy Ashdown and former Conservative cabinet | :01:08. | :01:09. | |
minister Owen Paterson go head-to-head. | :01:10. | :01:11. | |
Why Daisy could be left counting the cost. Is the county being swept | :01:12. | :01:33. | |
And with me, Tom Newton Dunn, Isabel Oakeshott and Steve Richards. | :01:34. | :01:35. | |
They'll be tweeting throughout the programme | :01:36. | :01:38. | |
Political leaders around the world have been reacting to the news | :01:39. | :01:45. | |
of the death of Fidel Castro, the Cuban revolutionary who came | :01:46. | :01:47. | |
to power in 1959 and ushered in a Marxist revolution. | :01:48. | :01:51. | |
Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson described the former leader | :01:52. | :01:56. | |
as an "historic if controversial figure" and said his death marked | :01:57. | :01:59. | |
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said Castro was "a champion of social | :02:00. | :02:03. | |
justice" who had "seen off a lot of US presidents" | :02:04. | :02:06. | |
President-elect Donald Trump described the former Cuban leader | :02:07. | :02:10. | |
as a "brutal dictator", adding that he hoped his death | :02:11. | :02:13. | |
would begin a new era "in which the wonderful Cuban people | :02:14. | :02:17. | |
finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve". | :02:18. | :02:22. | |
Meanwhile, the President of the European Commission, | :02:23. | :02:23. | |
Jean-Claude Juncker, said the controversial leader | :02:24. | :02:26. | |
was "a hero for many" but "his legacy will be judged | :02:27. | :02:29. | |
I guess we had worked that out ourselves. What do you make of the | :02:30. | :02:44. | |
reactions so far across the political divide? Predictable. And I | :02:45. | :02:49. | |
noticed that Jeremy Corbyn has come in for criticism for his tribute to | :02:50. | :02:56. | |
Castro. But I think it was the right thing for him to do. We all know he | :02:57. | :03:00. | |
was an admirer. He could have sat there for eight hours in his house, | :03:01. | :03:04. | |
agonising over some bland statement which didn't alienate the many | :03:05. | :03:07. | |
people who want to wade into attacked Castro. It would have been | :03:08. | :03:11. | |
inauthentic and would have just added to the sort of mainstream | :03:12. | :03:16. | |
consensus, and I think he was right to say what he believed in this | :03:17. | :03:20. | |
respect. Elsewhere, it has been wholly predictable that there would | :03:21. | :03:25. | |
be this device, because he divided opinion in such an emotive way. | :03:26. | :03:31. | |
Steve, I take your point about authenticity and it might have | :03:32. | :03:34. | |
looked a bit lame for Jeremy Corbyn to pretend that he had no affection | :03:35. | :03:40. | |
for Fidel Castro at all, but do you think he made a bit of an error | :03:41. | :03:44. | |
dismissing Castro's record, the negative side of it as just a floor? | :03:45. | :03:49. | |
He could have acknowledged in more elaborate terms the huge costs. He | :03:50. | :03:55. | |
wanted to go on about the health and education, which if you actually | :03:56. | :03:59. | |
look up the indices on that, they are good relative to other | :04:00. | :04:01. | |
countries. But they have come at such a huge cost. He was not a | :04:02. | :04:09. | |
champion of criminal justice. If he had done that, it would have been | :04:10. | :04:12. | |
utterly inauthentic. He doesn't believe it. And he would have | :04:13. | :04:18. | |
thought there would be many other people focusing on all the epic | :04:19. | :04:22. | |
failings. So he focused on what he believed. There are times when | :04:23. | :04:29. | |
Corbyn's prominence in the media world now as leader widens the | :04:30. | :04:33. | |
debate in an interesting and important way. I am not aware of any | :04:34. | :04:41. | |
criticisms that Mr Corbyn has ever announced about Mr Castro. There | :04:42. | :04:52. | |
were four words in his statement yesterday which is spin doctor would | :04:53. | :04:55. | |
have forced him to say, for all his flaws. He was on this Cuban | :04:56. | :05:04. | |
solidarity committee, which didn't exist to criticise Castro. It | :05:05. | :05:09. | |
existed to help protect Castro from those, particularly the Americans, | :05:10. | :05:13. | |
who were trying to undermine him. And Corbyn made a big deal yesterday | :05:14. | :05:17. | |
saying he has always called out human rights abuses all over the | :05:18. | :05:23. | |
world. But he said that in general, I call out human rights abuses. He | :05:24. | :05:27. | |
never said, I have called out human rights abuses in Cuba. In the weeks | :05:28. | :05:34. | |
ahead, more will come out about what these human rights abuses were. The | :05:35. | :05:42. | |
lid will come off what was actually happening. Some well authenticated | :05:43. | :05:48. | |
stories are pretty horrendous. I was speaking to a journalist who was | :05:49. | :05:54. | |
working there in the 1990s, who gave me vivid examples of that, and there | :05:55. | :06:01. | |
will be more to come. I still go back to, when a major figure diet | :06:02. | :06:05. | |
and you are a leader who has admired but major figure, you have to say | :06:06. | :06:11. | |
it. That is the trap he has fallen into. He has proved every criticism | :06:12. | :06:28. | |
that he is a duck old ideologue. But he is not the only one. Prime | :06:29. | :06:34. | |
Minister Trudeau was so if uses that I wondered if they were going to | :06:35. | :06:41. | |
open up a book of condolences. I think it reinforces Corbyn's failing | :06:42. | :06:45. | |
brand. It may be authentic, but authentic isn't working for him. | :06:46. | :06:49. | |
When I was driving, I heard Trevor Phillips, who is a Blairite, saying | :06:50. | :06:56. | |
the record was mixed and there were a lot of things to admire as well as | :06:57. | :07:01. | |
all the terrible things. So it is quite nuanced. But if you are a | :07:02. | :07:04. | |
leader issuing a sound bite, there is no space for new ones. You either | :07:05. | :07:09. | |
decide to go for the consensus, which is to set up on the whole, it | :07:10. | :07:15. | |
was a brutal dictatorship. Or you say, here is an extraordinary figure | :07:16. | :07:19. | |
worthy of admiration. In my view, he was right to say what he believed. | :07:20. | :07:24. | |
There was still a dilemma for the British government over who they | :07:25. | :07:28. | |
sent to the funeral. Do they sent nobody, do they say and Boris | :07:29. | :07:35. | |
Johnson as a post-ironic statement? There is now a post-Castro Cuba to | :07:36. | :07:43. | |
deal with. Trump was quite diplomatic about post-Castro Cuba. | :07:44. | :07:46. | |
And Boris Johnson's statement was restrained. The thing about Mr | :07:47. | :07:55. | |
Castro was the longevity, 50 years of keeping Marxism on the island. | :07:56. | :07:58. | |
That was what made it so fascinating. | :07:59. | :08:00. | |
Before the last election, George Osborne promised the NHS | :08:01. | :08:03. | |
in England a real-terms funding boost of ?8 billion per year by 2020 | :08:04. | :08:07. | |
on the understanding that NHS bosses would also find ?22 billion worth | :08:08. | :08:10. | |
Since last autumn, NHS managers have been drawing up what they're calling | :08:11. | :08:17. | |
"Sustainability and Transformation Plans" to make these savings, | :08:18. | :08:20. | |
but some of the proposals are already running into local | :08:21. | :08:26. | |
opposition, while Labour say they amount to huge cuts to the NHS. | :08:27. | :08:29. | |
Help is on the way for an elderly person in need in Hertfordshire. | :08:30. | :08:35. | |
But east of England ambulance call operators | :08:36. | :08:38. | |
they're sending an early intervention vehicle | :08:39. | :08:43. | |
with a council-employed occupational therapist on board. | :08:44. | :08:50. | |
It's being piloted here for over 65s with | :08:51. | :08:52. | |
When they arrive, a paramedic judges if the patient can be | :08:53. | :08:58. | |
treated immediately at home without a trip to hospital. | :08:59. | :09:01. | |
Around 80% of patients have been treated this way, | :09:02. | :09:03. | |
taking the strain off urgently-needed hospital beds, | :09:04. | :09:06. | |
So the early intervention team has assessed the patient and decided | :09:07. | :09:12. | |
The key to successful integration for Hertfordshire being able | :09:13. | :09:25. | |
to collaboratively look at how we use our resources, | :09:26. | :09:27. | |
to have pooled budgets, to allow us to understand | :09:28. | :09:29. | |
where spend is, and to let us make conscientious decisions about how | :09:30. | :09:33. | |
best to use that money, to come up with ideas to problems | :09:34. | :09:37. | |
that sit between our organisations, to look at things collaboratively. | :09:38. | :09:40. | |
This Hertfordshire hospital is also a good example of how | :09:41. | :09:42. | |
You won't find an A unit or overnight beds here any more. | :09:43. | :09:50. | |
The closest ones are 20 minutes down the road. | :09:51. | :09:55. | |
What's left is nurse-led care in an NHS-built hospital. | :09:56. | :09:57. | |
Despite a politically toxic change, this reconfiguration went | :09:58. | :10:01. | |
through after broad public and political consultation | :10:02. | :10:03. | |
with hospital clinicians and GPs on board. | :10:04. | :10:07. | |
It's a notable achievement that's surely of interest to 60% of NHS | :10:08. | :10:11. | |
trusts in England that reported a deficit at the end of September. | :10:12. | :10:17. | |
It's not just here that the NHS needs to save money and provide | :10:18. | :10:20. | |
The Government is going to pour in an extra ?8 billion into the NHS | :10:21. | :10:27. | |
in England, but it has demanded ?22 billion | :10:28. | :10:33. | |
worth of efficiencies across the country. | :10:34. | :10:35. | |
In order to deliver that, the NHS has created 44 health | :10:36. | :10:37. | |
and care partnerships, and each one will provide | :10:38. | :10:40. | |
a sustainability and transformation plan, or STP, to integrate care, | :10:41. | :10:44. | |
provide better services and save money. | :10:45. | :10:48. | |
So far, 33 of these 44 regional plans, drawn up by senior people | :10:49. | :10:53. | |
in the health service and local government, | :10:54. | :10:55. | |
The NHS has been through five years of severely constrained spending | :10:56. | :11:02. | |
growth, and there are another 4-5 years on the way at least. | :11:03. | :11:05. | |
STPs themselves are an attempt to deal in a planned way | :11:06. | :11:11. | |
But with plans to close some A units and reduce the number | :11:12. | :11:18. | |
of hospital beds, there's likely to be a tough political battle | :11:19. | :11:23. | |
ahead, with many MPs already up in arms about proposed | :11:24. | :11:27. | |
This Tory backbencher is concerned about the local plans for his | :11:28. | :11:30. | |
I wouldn't call it an efficiency if you are proposing to close | :11:31. | :11:38. | |
all of the beds which are currently provided for those coming out | :11:39. | :11:42. | |
of the acute sector who are elderly and looking | :11:43. | :11:44. | |
That's not a cut, it's not an efficiency saving, | :11:45. | :11:48. | |
All 44 STPs should be published in a month's time, | :11:49. | :11:56. | |
But even before that, they dominated this week's PMQs. | :11:57. | :12:01. | |
The Government's sustainability and transformation plans | :12:02. | :12:04. | |
for the National Health Service hide ?22 billion of cuts. | :12:05. | :12:09. | |
The National Health Service is indeed looking for savings | :12:10. | :12:12. | |
within the NHS, which will be reinvested in the NHS. | :12:13. | :12:17. | |
There will be no escape from angry MPs for the Health Secretary either. | :12:18. | :12:21. | |
Well, I have spoken to the Secretary of State just this week | :12:22. | :12:24. | |
about the importance of community hospitals in general, | :12:25. | :12:29. | |
These are proposals out to consultation. | :12:30. | :12:35. | |
What could happen if these plans get blocked? | :12:36. | :12:39. | |
If STPs cannot be made to work, the planned changes don't come | :12:40. | :12:43. | |
to pass, then the NHS will see over time a sort of unplanned | :12:44. | :12:48. | |
deterioration and services becoming unstable and service | :12:49. | :12:50. | |
The NHS barely featured in this week's Autumn Statement | :12:51. | :12:56. | |
but the Prime Minister insisted beforehand that STPs | :12:57. | :13:03. | |
are in the interests of local people. | :13:04. | :13:05. | |
Her Government's support will now be critical for NHS England | :13:06. | :13:07. | |
to push through these controversial regional plans, | :13:08. | :13:09. | |
which will soon face public scrutiny. | :13:10. | :13:16. | |
We did ask the Department of Health for an interview, | :13:17. | :13:21. | |
I've been joined by the Shadow Health Secretary, | :13:22. | :13:24. | |
Do you accept that the NHS is capable of making ?22 billion of | :13:25. | :13:41. | |
efficiency savings? Well, we are very sceptical, as are number of | :13:42. | :13:45. | |
independent organisations about the ability of the NHS to find 22 | :13:46. | :13:50. | |
billion of efficiencies without that affecting front line care. When you | :13:51. | :13:54. | |
drill down into the 22 billion, based on the information we have | :13:55. | :13:57. | |
been given, and there hasn't been much information, we can see that | :13:58. | :14:01. | |
some of it will come from cutting the budget which go to community | :14:02. | :14:05. | |
pharmacies, which could lead, according to ministers, to 3000 | :14:06. | :14:08. | |
pharmacies closing, which we believe will increase demands on A and | :14:09. | :14:13. | |
GPs, and also that a lot of these changes which are being proposed, | :14:14. | :14:17. | |
which was the focus of the package, we think will mean service cuts at a | :14:18. | :14:25. | |
local level. Do they? The chief executive of NHS England says these | :14:26. | :14:31. | |
efficiency plans are "Incredibly important". He used to work from | :14:32. | :14:34. | |
Labour. The independent King's Fund calls them "The best hope to improve | :14:35. | :14:41. | |
health and care services. There is no plan B". On the sustainable | :14:42. | :14:48. | |
transformation plans, which will be across England to link up physical | :14:49. | :14:51. | |
health, mental health and social care, for those services to | :14:52. | :14:56. | |
collaborate more closely together and move beyond the fragmented | :14:57. | :14:58. | |
system we have at the moment is important. It seems that the ground | :14:59. | :15:05. | |
has shifted. It has moved into filling financial gaps. As we know, | :15:06. | :15:09. | |
the NHS is going through the biggest financial squeeze in its history. By | :15:10. | :15:14. | |
2018, per head spending on the NHS will be falling. If you want to | :15:15. | :15:18. | |
redesign services for the long term in a local area, you need to put the | :15:19. | :15:24. | |
money in. So of course, getting these services working better | :15:25. | :15:26. | |
together and having a greater strategic oversight, which we would | :15:27. | :15:30. | |
have had if we had not got rid of strategic health authority is in the | :15:31. | :15:35. | |
last Parliament. But this is not an attempt to save 22 billion, this is | :15:36. | :15:40. | |
an attempt to spend 22 billion more successfully, don't you accept that? | :15:41. | :15:47. | |
Simon Stevens said we need 8 billion, and we need to find 22 | :15:48. | :15:54. | |
billion of savings. You have to spend 22 billion more efficiently. | :15:55. | :15:59. | |
But the Government have not given that 8 billion to the NHS which they | :16:00. | :16:04. | |
said they would. They said they would do it by 2020. But they have | :16:05. | :16:10. | |
changed the definitions of spending so NHS England will get 8 billion by | :16:11. | :16:15. | |
2020, but they have cut the public health budgets by about 4 million by | :16:16. | :16:21. | |
20 20. The budget that going to initiatives to tackle sexually | :16:22. | :16:25. | |
transmitted diseases, to tackle smoking have been cut back but the | :16:26. | :16:30. | |
commissioning of things like school nurses and health visitors have been | :16:31. | :16:34. | |
cut back as well. Simon Stevens said he can only deliver that five-year | :16:35. | :16:38. | |
project if there is a radical upgrade in public health, which the | :16:39. | :16:42. | |
Government have failed on, and if we deal with social care, and this week | :16:43. | :16:47. | |
there was an... I understand that, but if you don't think the | :16:48. | :16:54. | |
efficiency drive can free up 22 billion to take us to 30 billion by | :16:55. | :17:00. | |
2020, where would you get the money from? I have been in this post now | :17:01. | :17:04. | |
for five or six weeks and I want to have a big consultation with | :17:05. | :17:07. | |
everybody who works in the health sector, as well as patients, carers | :17:08. | :17:13. | |
and families. Though you don't know? I think it would be surprised if I | :17:14. | :17:20. | |
had an arbitrary figure this soon into the job. Your party said they | :17:21. | :17:26. | |
expected election of spring by this year, you need to have some idea by | :17:27. | :17:31. | |
now, you inherited a portfolio from Diane Abbott, did she have no idea? | :17:32. | :17:36. | |
To govern is to make choices and we would make different choices. The | :17:37. | :17:41. | |
budget last year scored billions of giveaways in things like | :17:42. | :17:48. | |
co-operating -- corporation tax. What I do want to do... Is work on a | :17:49. | :17:59. | |
plan and the general election, whenever it comes, next year or in | :18:00. | :18:05. | |
2020 or in between, to have costed plan for the NHS. But your party is | :18:06. | :18:09. | |
committed to balancing the books on current spending, that is currently | :18:10. | :18:15. | |
John McDonnell, the Shadow Chancellor's position. What we are | :18:16. | :18:20. | |
talking about, this extra 30 billion, that is essentially current | :18:21. | :18:24. | |
spending so if it doesn't come from efficiency savings, where does the | :18:25. | :18:28. | |
money come from? Some of it is also capital. Mainly current spending. If | :18:29. | :18:35. | |
you look at the details of the OBR, they have switched a million from | :18:36. | :18:47. | |
the capital into revenue. Why -- how do you balance spending? | :18:48. | :18:50. | |
That is why we need to have a debate. Every time we ask for | :18:51. | :18:59. | |
Labour's policy, we are always told me a debate. Surely it is time to | :19:00. | :19:03. | |
give some idea of what you stand for? There's huge doubts about the | :19:04. | :19:07. | |
Government 's policy on this. You are the opposition, how would you do | :19:08. | :19:12. | |
it? I want to work with John McDonnell to find a package to give | :19:13. | :19:16. | |
the NHS the money it needs, but of course our Shadow Chancellor, like | :19:17. | :19:20. | |
any Shadow Chancellor at this stage in the cycle, will want to see what | :19:21. | :19:24. | |
the books look like a head of an election before making commitments. | :19:25. | :19:30. | |
I am clear that the Labour Party has to go into the next general election | :19:31. | :19:33. | |
with a clear policy to give the NHS the funding it needs because it has | :19:34. | :19:36. | |
been going through the largest financial squeeze in its history. | :19:37. | :19:41. | |
You say Labour will always give the NHS the money it needs, that is not | :19:42. | :19:46. | |
a policy, it is a blank cheque. It is an indication of our commitment | :19:47. | :19:51. | |
to the NHS. Under this Conservative government, the NHS has been getting | :19:52. | :19:55. | |
a 1% increase. Throughout its history it has usually have about | :19:56. | :20:00. | |
4%. Under the last Labour government it was getting 4%, before that | :20:01. | :20:05. | |
substantially more. We think the NHS should get more but I don't have | :20:06. | :20:08. | |
access to the NHS books in front of me. The public thinks there needs to | :20:09. | :20:17. | |
be more money spent on health but they also think that should go cap | :20:18. | :20:22. | |
in hand with the money being more efficiently spent, which is what | :20:23. | :20:27. | |
this efficiency drive is designed to release 22 billion. Do you have an | :20:28. | :20:33. | |
efficiency drive if it is not the Government's one? Of course we | :20:34. | :20:38. | |
agree. We agree the NHS should be more efficient, we want to see | :20:39. | :20:43. | |
productivity increased. Do know how to do that? One way is through | :20:44. | :20:50. | |
investments, maintenance, but there is a 5 million maintenance backlog. | :20:51. | :20:56. | |
One of the most high risk backlogs is something like 730 million. They | :20:57. | :21:03. | |
are going to switch the capital spend into revenue spend. I believe | :21:04. | :21:07. | |
that when you invest in maintenance and capital in the NHS, that | :21:08. | :21:11. | |
contribute to increasing its productivity. You are now talking | :21:12. | :21:15. | |
about 5 billion the maintenance, the chief executive says it needs 30 | :21:16. | :21:21. | |
billion more by 2020 as a minimum so that 35 billion. You want to spend | :21:22. | :21:28. | |
more on social care, another for 5 billion on that so we have proper | :21:29. | :21:31. | |
care in the community. By that calculation I'm up to about 40 | :21:32. | :21:35. | |
billion, which is fine, except where do you get the and balance the | :21:36. | :21:40. | |
account at the same time? We will have to come up with a plan for that | :21:41. | :21:45. | |
and that's why I will work with our Shadow Treasury team to come up with | :21:46. | :21:48. | |
that plan when they head into the general election. At the moment we | :21:49. | :21:52. | |
are saying to the NHS, sorry, we are not going to give you the | :21:53. | :21:56. | |
investment, which is why we are seeing patient care deteriorating. | :21:57. | :22:04. | |
The staff are doing incredible things but 180,000 are waiting in | :22:05. | :22:10. | |
A beyond four hours, record levels of people delayed in beds in | :22:11. | :22:13. | |
hospitals because there are not the beds in the community to go to save | :22:14. | :22:17. | |
the NHS needs the investment. We know that and we know the | :22:18. | :22:20. | |
Government's response to that and many think it is inadequate. What | :22:21. | :22:25. | |
I'm trying to get from you is what your response would be and what your | :22:26. | :22:28. | |
reaction will be to these efficiency plans. Your colleague Heidi | :22:29. | :22:33. | |
Alexander, she had your job earlier this year, she warned of the danger | :22:34. | :22:40. | |
of knee jerk blanket opposition to local efficiency plans. Do you agree | :22:41. | :22:47. | |
with that? Yes. So every time a hospital is going to close as a | :22:48. | :22:53. | |
result of this, and some will, it is Labour default position not just | :22:54. | :22:57. | |
going to be we are against it? That is why we are going to judge each of | :22:58. | :23:01. | |
these sustainability plans by a number of yardsticks. We want to see | :23:02. | :23:05. | |
if they have the support of local clinicians, we want to see if they | :23:06. | :23:09. | |
have the support of local authorities because they now have a | :23:10. | :23:12. | |
role in the delivery of health care. We want to see if they make the | :23:13. | :23:16. | |
right decisions for the long-term trends in population for local area. | :23:17. | :23:20. | |
We want to see if they integrate social care and health. If they | :23:21. | :23:24. | |
don't and therefore you will not bank that as an efficiency saving, | :23:25. | :23:29. | |
you will say no, that's not the way to go, you are left then with | :23:30. | :23:34. | |
finding the alternative funding to keep the NHS going. If you are | :23:35. | :23:40. | |
cutting beds, for example the proposal is to cut something like | :23:41. | :23:46. | |
5000 beds in Derbyshire and if there is the space in the community sector | :23:47. | :23:49. | |
in Derbyshire, that will cause big problems for the NHS in the long | :23:50. | :23:54. | |
term so it is a false economy. An example like that, we would be very | :23:55. | :23:59. | |
sceptical the plans could work. Would it not be honest, given the | :24:00. | :24:02. | |
sums of money involved and your doubts about the efficiency plan, | :24:03. | :24:08. | |
which are shared by many people, to just say, look, among the wealthy | :24:09. | :24:13. | |
nations, we spend a lower proportion of our GDP on health than most of | :24:14. | :24:19. | |
the other countries, European countries included, we need to put | :24:20. | :24:24. | |
up tax if we want a proper NHS. Wouldn't that be honest? I'm not the | :24:25. | :24:30. | |
Shadow Chancellor, I don't make taxation policy. You are tempting me | :24:31. | :24:36. | |
down a particular road by you or I smile. John McDonnell will come up | :24:37. | :24:40. | |
with our taxation policy. We have had an ambition to meet the European | :24:41. | :24:43. | |
average, the way these things are measured have changed since then, | :24:44. | :24:47. | |
but we did have that ambition and for a few years we met it. We need | :24:48. | :24:54. | |
substantial investment in the NHS. Everyone accepts it was | :24:55. | :24:56. | |
extraordinary that there wasn't an extra penny for the NHS in the | :24:57. | :25:00. | |
Autumn Statement this week. And as we go into the general election, | :25:01. | :25:05. | |
whenever it is, we will have a plan for the NHS. Come back and speak to | :25:06. | :25:10. | |
us when you know what you are going to do. Thank you. | :25:11. | :25:12. | |
Theresa May has promised to trigger formal Brexit negotiations | :25:13. | :25:15. | |
before the end of March, but the Prime Minister must wait | :25:16. | :25:17. | |
for the Supreme Court to decide whether parliament must vote | :25:18. | :25:20. | |
If that is the Supreme Court's conclusion, the Liberal Democrats | :25:21. | :25:23. | |
and others in parliament have said they'll demand a second EU | :25:24. | :25:26. | |
referendum on the terms of the eventual Brexit deal before | :25:27. | :25:28. | |
And last week, two former Prime Ministers suggested | :25:29. | :25:31. | |
that the referendum result could be reversed. | :25:32. | :25:34. | |
In an interview with the New Statesman on Thursday, | :25:35. | :25:38. | |
Tony Blair said, "It can be stopped if the British people decide that, | :25:39. | :25:41. | |
having seen what it means, the pain-gain cost-benefit analysis | :25:42. | :25:43. | |
John Major also weighed in, telling a meeting | :25:44. | :25:50. | |
of the National Liberal Club that the terms of Brexit | :25:51. | :25:52. | |
were being dictated by the "tyranny of the majority". | :25:53. | :25:54. | |
He also said there is a "perfectly credible case" | :25:55. | :25:56. | |
That prompted the former Conservative leader | :25:57. | :26:00. | |
Iain Duncan Smith to criticise John Major. | :26:01. | :26:04. | |
He told the BBC, "The idea we delay everything simply | :26:05. | :26:06. | |
because they disagree with the original result does | :26:07. | :26:08. | |
seem to me an absolute dismissal of democracy." | :26:09. | :26:13. | |
So, is there a realistic chance of a second referendum on the terms | :26:14. | :26:16. | |
of whatever Brexit deal Theresa May manages to secure? | :26:17. | :26:21. | |
Lib Dem party leader Tim Farron has said, "We want to respect | :26:22. | :26:25. | |
the will of the people and that means they must have their say | :26:26. | :26:28. | |
in a referendum on the terms of the deal." | :26:29. | :26:31. | |
But the Lib Dems have just eight MPs - they'll need Labour support | :26:32. | :26:35. | |
One ally is former Labour leadership candidate Owen Smith. | :26:36. | :26:40. | |
He backs the idea of a second referendum. | :26:41. | :26:44. | |
But yesterday the party's deputy leader, Tom Watson, said that, | :26:45. | :26:47. | |
"Unlike the Lib Dem Brexit Deniers, we believe in respecting | :26:48. | :26:49. | |
To discuss whether or not there should be a second referendum | :26:50. | :26:57. | |
on the terms of the Brexit deal, I've been joined by two | :26:58. | :27:00. | |
In Somerset is the former Lib Dem leader Paddy Ashdown, | :27:01. | :27:03. | |
and in Shropshire is the former Conservative cabinet minister | :27:04. | :27:06. | |
Paddy Ashdown, let me come to you first. When the British people have | :27:07. | :27:17. | |
spoken, you do what they command, either you believe in democracy or | :27:18. | :27:23. | |
you don't. When democracy speaks, we obey. Your words on the night of the | :27:24. | :27:30. | |
referendum, what's changed? Nothing has changed, Andrew, that's what I | :27:31. | :27:33. | |
said and what I still believe in. The British people have spoken, we | :27:34. | :27:38. | |
will not block Parliament debating the Brexit decision, Article 50, but | :27:39. | :27:44. | |
we will introduce an amendment to say that we need to consult the | :27:45. | :27:51. | |
British people, not about if we go out but what destination we would | :27:52. | :27:58. | |
then achieve. There is a vast difference in ordinary people's | :27:59. | :28:02. | |
lives between the so-called hard Brexit and soft Brexit. Soft Brexit, | :28:03. | :28:06. | |
you remain in the single market, you have to accept and agree on | :28:07. | :28:11. | |
immigration. Hard Brexit you are out of the single market, we have many | :28:12. | :28:19. | |
fewer jobs... Why didn't you say before the referendum there would be | :28:20. | :28:25. | |
a second referendum on the terms? Forgive me, I said it on many | :28:26. | :28:29. | |
occasions, you may not have covered it, Andrew, but that's a different | :28:30. | :28:34. | |
thing. In every speech I gave I said this, and this has proved to be | :28:35. | :28:38. | |
true, since those who recommended Brexit refused to tell us the | :28:39. | :28:42. | |
destination they were recommending, they refuse to give any detail about | :28:43. | :28:47. | |
the destination, if we did vote to go out, it would probably be | :28:48. | :28:51. | |
appropriate to decide which destination, hard Brexit or soft | :28:52. | :28:55. | |
Brexit we go to. They deliberately obscure that because it made it more | :28:56. | :29:00. | |
difficult to argue the case. It wasn't part of the official campaign | :29:01. | :29:06. | |
but let me come to Owen Paterson. What's wrong with a referendum on | :29:07. | :29:10. | |
the terms of the deal? We voted to leave but we don't really know on | :29:11. | :29:14. | |
what conditions we leave so what's wrong with negotiating the deal and | :29:15. | :29:17. | |
putting that deal to the British people? This would be a ridiculous | :29:18. | :29:25. | |
idea, it would be a complete gift to the EU negotiators to go for an | :29:26. | :29:30. | |
impossibly difficult deal because they want to do everything to make | :29:31. | :29:34. | |
sure that Brexit does not go through. This nonsense idea of hard | :29:35. | :29:39. | |
Brexit and soft Brexit, it was never discussed during the referendum | :29:40. | :29:43. | |
campaign. We made it clear we wanted to take back control, that means | :29:44. | :29:49. | |
making our own laws, raising and spending the money agreed by elected | :29:50. | :29:53. | |
politicians, getting control of our own borders back, and getting | :29:54. | :29:56. | |
control of our ability to do trade deals around the world. That was | :29:57. | :30:00. | |
clear at all stages of the referendum. We got 17.4 million | :30:01. | :30:06. | |
votes, the biggest vote in history for any issue, that 52%, 10% more | :30:07. | :30:11. | |
than John Major got and he was happy with his record number of 14 | :30:12. | :30:16. | |
million, more than Tony Blair got, which was 43%, so we have a very | :30:17. | :30:21. | |
clear mandate. Time and again people come up to me and say when are we | :30:22. | :30:25. | |
going to get on with this. The big problem is uncertainty. We want to | :30:26. | :30:29. | |
trigger Article 50, have the negotiation and get to a better | :30:30. | :30:31. | |
place. OK, I need to get a debate going. | :30:32. | :30:41. | |
Paddy Ashdown, the EU doesn't want us to leave. If they knew there was | :30:42. | :30:45. | |
going to be a second referendum, surely there was going to be a | :30:46. | :30:47. | |
second referendum, surely their incentive would be to give us the | :30:48. | :30:49. | |
worst possible deal would vote against it would put us in a | :30:50. | :30:54. | |
ridiculous negotiating position. On the contrary, the government could | :30:55. | :30:59. | |
go and negotiate with the European Union and anyway, the opinion of the | :31:00. | :31:02. | |
European Union is less important than the opinion of the British | :31:03. | :31:06. | |
people. It seems to me that Owen Paterson made the case for me | :31:07. | :31:10. | |
precisely. They refuse to discuss what kind of destination. Britain | :31:11. | :31:16. | |
voted for departure, but not a destination. Because Owen Paterson | :31:17. | :31:19. | |
and his colleagues refused to discuss what their model was. So the | :31:20. | :31:24. | |
range of options here and the impact on the people of Britain is huge. | :31:25. | :31:28. | |
There is nothing to stop the government going to negotiate, | :31:29. | :31:31. | |
getting the best deal it can and go into the British people and saying, | :31:32. | :31:37. | |
this is the deal, guys, do you agree? Owen Paterson? It is simple. | :31:38. | :31:44. | |
The British people voted to leave. We voted to take back control of our | :31:45. | :31:51. | |
laws, our money, our borders. But most people don't know the shape of | :31:52. | :31:54. | |
what the deal would be. So why not have a vote on it? Because it would | :31:55. | :32:01. | |
be a gift to the EU negotiators to drive the worst possible deal in the | :32:02. | :32:06. | |
hope that it might be chucked out with a second referendum. The | :32:07. | :32:10. | |
biggest danger is the uncertainty. We have the biggest vote in British | :32:11. | :32:17. | |
history. You have said all that. It was your side that originally | :32:18. | :32:21. | |
proposed a second referendum. The director of Leave said, there is a | :32:22. | :32:26. | |
strong democratic case for a referendum on what the deal looks | :32:27. | :32:32. | |
like. Your side. Come on, you are digging up a blog from June of 2015. | :32:33. | :32:43. | |
He said he had not come to a conclusion. He said it is a distinct | :32:44. | :32:51. | |
possibility. No senior members of the campaign said we would have a | :32:52. | :32:56. | |
second referendum. It is worth chucking Paddy the quote he gave on | :32:57. | :33:00. | |
ITV news, whether it is a majority of 1% or 20%, when the British | :33:01. | :33:03. | |
people have spoken, you do what they command. People come up to me and | :33:04. | :33:10. | |
keep asking, when are you going to get on with it? What do you say to | :33:11. | :33:20. | |
that, Paddy Ashdown? Owen Paterson has obviously not been paying | :33:21. | :33:23. | |
attention. You ask me that question at the start. Owen and his kind have | :33:24. | :33:33. | |
to stick to the same argument. During the referendum, when we said | :33:34. | :33:37. | |
that the Europeans have it in their interest to picket tough for us, | :33:38. | :33:43. | |
they would suffer as well. And that has proved to be right. The European | :33:44. | :33:47. | |
Union does not wish to hand as a bad deal, because they may suffer in the | :33:48. | :33:52. | |
process. We need the best deal for both sides. I can't understand why | :33:53. | :34:04. | |
Owen is now reversing that argument. Here is the question I am going to | :34:05. | :34:08. | |
ask you. If we have a second referendum on the deal and we vote | :34:09. | :34:17. | |
by a very small amount, by a sliver, to stay in, can we then make it | :34:18. | :34:28. | |
best-of-3? No, Andrew! Vince Cable says he thinks if you won, he would | :34:29. | :34:33. | |
have to have a decider. You will have to put that income tax, because | :34:34. | :34:37. | |
I don't remember when he said that. -- you have to put that in context. | :34:38. | :34:45. | |
Independent, 19th of September. That is a decision on the outcome. The | :34:46. | :34:51. | |
central point is that the British people voted for departure, not a | :34:52. | :34:56. | |
destination. In response to the claim that this is undemocratic, if | :34:57. | :35:01. | |
it is democratic to have one referendum, how can it be | :35:02. | :35:07. | |
undemocratic to have two? Owen Paterson, the British government, on | :35:08. | :35:09. | |
the brink of triggering article 50, cannot tell us if we will remain | :35:10. | :35:14. | |
members of the single market, if we will remain members of the customs | :35:15. | :35:20. | |
union. From that flows our ability to make trade deals, our attitude | :35:21. | :35:24. | |
towards freedom of movement and the rest of it. Given that the | :35:25. | :35:27. | |
government can't tell us, it is clear that the British people have | :35:28. | :35:31. | |
no idea what the eventual shape will be. That is surely the fundamental | :35:32. | :35:37. | |
case for a second referendum. Emphatically not. They have given a | :35:38. | :35:43. | |
clear vote. That vote was to take back control. What the establishment | :35:44. | :35:51. | |
figures like Paddy should recognise is the shattering damage it would do | :35:52. | :35:53. | |
to the integrity of the whole political process if this was not | :35:54. | :36:01. | |
delivered. People come up to me, as I have said for the third time now, | :36:02. | :36:04. | |
wanting to know when we will get article 50 triggered. Both people | :36:05. | :36:10. | |
who have voted to Remain and to Leave. If we do not deliver this, it | :36:11. | :36:14. | |
will be disastrous for the reputation and integrity of the | :36:15. | :36:18. | |
whole political establishment. Let me put that you Paddy Ashdown. It is | :36:19. | :36:26. | |
very Brussels elite - were ask your question but if we don't like the | :36:27. | :36:30. | |
answer, we will keep asking the question. Did it with the Irish and | :36:31. | :36:39. | |
French. It is... It would really anger the British people, would it | :36:40. | :36:45. | |
not? That is an interesting question, Andrew. I don't think it | :36:46. | :36:49. | |
would. All the evidence I see in public meetings I attended, and I | :36:50. | :36:53. | |
think it is beginning to show in the opinion polls, although there hasn't | :36:54. | :36:56. | |
been a proper one on this yet, I suspect there is a majority in | :36:57. | :36:59. | |
Britain who would wish to see a second referendum on the outcome. | :37:00. | :37:03. | |
They take the same view as I do. What began with an open democratic | :37:04. | :37:08. | |
process cannot end with a government stitch up. Contrary to what Owen | :37:09. | :37:12. | |
suggests, there is public support for this. And far from damaging the | :37:13. | :37:19. | |
government and the political class, it showed that we are prepared to | :37:20. | :37:23. | |
listen. We shall see. Paddy Ashdown, have you eaten your hat yet? Andrew, | :37:24. | :37:33. | |
as you well know, I have eaten five hats. You cannot have a second | :37:34. | :37:38. | |
referendum until you eat your hat on my programme. We will leave it | :37:39. | :37:41. | |
there. Paddy Ashdown and Owen Paterson, thank you much. I have | :37:42. | :37:48. | |
eaten a hat on your programme. I don't remember! | :37:49. | :37:51. | |
It's just gone 11.35, you're watching the Sunday Politics. | :37:52. | :37:53. | |
We say goodbye to viewers in Scotland, who leave us now | :37:54. | :38:05. | |
Hello. Coming up: why Daisy could be left counting the cost of Cumbria's | :38:06. | :38:16. | |
infighting. The reality is devolution is the only game in town | :38:17. | :38:17. | |
and if we don't want to get play and if we don't want to get play | :38:18. | :38:20. | |
that game we are going to get left behind. And chewing the cud over the | :38:21. | :38:30. | |
Autumn Statement, my two guests. The Autumn Statement was the big news | :38:31. | :38:35. | |
this week. Was there enough specific in it for our region? Definitely. It | :38:36. | :38:40. | |
sets out what we need to do to tackle the challenges of the | :38:41. | :38:44. | |
Northwest. ?13 billion has been reconfirmed for the North in terms | :38:45. | :38:48. | |
of infrastructure. Is that new stuff? Yeah, the button has been | :38:49. | :38:57. | |
pressed for the M-16, improvements. New money on our and D. ?2 billion a | :38:58. | :39:01. | |
year, which will be vitally important for life sciences, | :39:02. | :39:04. | |
critical for Manchester and Cheshire as well. ?556 million promised for | :39:05. | :39:06. | |
deals which will be allocated by our deals which will be allocated by our | :39:07. | :39:12. | |
enterprise partnership. That's an important package that will really | :39:13. | :39:16. | |
help take forward the Northern Powerhouse. Anything you want to see | :39:17. | :39:20. | |
which wasn't in there? I think this Autumn Statement helped to set out | :39:21. | :39:25. | |
some stability and help build confidence. It was a good package. | :39:26. | :39:30. | |
Lucy, presumably you don't agree. We have seen the nail in the coffin of | :39:31. | :39:35. | |
six years of austerity from the Conservative government. Posterity | :39:36. | :39:39. | |
has now failed and its own terms because the deficit is now going to | :39:40. | :39:44. | |
be just about half in the next three years and it wasn't in 2010. They | :39:45. | :39:48. | |
said they were going to eliminated by now. It would reduce the deficit | :39:49. | :39:51. | |
even slower than the Labour Party even slower than the Labour Party | :39:52. | :39:56. | |
reduced -- promised to do six years ago. Posterity has failed to provide | :39:57. | :39:59. | |
the investment and support the economy needed to grow. That's why | :40:00. | :40:03. | |
we are seeing... What was the Labour and suffer these problems? We've got | :40:04. | :40:08. | |
to invest in the future, invest in people, making sure people have the | :40:09. | :40:12. | |
skills and education. We are seeing huge cuts to education and skills | :40:13. | :40:16. | |
budgets. It's a false economy. We cannot be the high wage, high skill | :40:17. | :40:21. | |
economy. We are still seeing faster growth in Germany and France as | :40:22. | :40:28. | |
well. -- faster growth than Germany and France. We have the worst | :40:29. | :40:32. | |
productivity in the Western world pretty much which means we have | :40:33. | :40:35. | |
people here working longer for less because we've got a very unstable | :40:36. | :40:43. | |
workforce, doing short hours or in and out of work. Very insecure work. | :40:44. | :40:48. | |
We have really got to have a big ambition here to be a country that | :40:49. | :40:52. | |
has got high skilled, high wage secure labour market. Thanks both of | :40:53. | :41:01. | |
you. The gloomy economic forecast made most headlines although the | :41:02. | :41:04. | |
rise in the minimum wage and spending on some major projects were | :41:05. | :41:10. | |
among the measures. In one part of our region, Cumbria, there are | :41:11. | :41:12. | |
concerns that the county is being left behind. | :41:13. | :41:18. | |
I am the fifth generation to farm here. James Robinson's family have | :41:19. | :41:23. | |
had their farm outside candle for more than 140 years. When his great, | :41:24. | :41:29. | |
great grandfather came here in 1875, one thing he didn't have to worry | :41:30. | :41:35. | |
about was slow broadband. Broadband has been atrocious in the past two | :41:36. | :41:39. | |
years. We are lucky that we are fairly close to town so we get a | :41:40. | :41:42. | |
reasonable speed. It's still not brilliant. Don't have to go too far | :41:43. | :41:46. | |
away over the hill towards the village and its atrocious over | :41:47. | :41:51. | |
there. We do think... We are fairly lucky but it's... The Chancellor has | :41:52. | :42:00. | |
promised to spend ?1 billion to improve broadband speeds, good news | :42:01. | :42:03. | |
you would think for James and others living in rural areas of south | :42:04. | :42:09. | |
Cumbria. The campaigners planning to install their | :42:10. | :42:10. | |
broadband here it will not help broadband here it will not help | :42:11. | :42:13. | |
them. Commercial companies will be using that money and they will be | :42:14. | :42:20. | |
wanting to make a profit and it will be used in towns. Our rural areas | :42:21. | :42:28. | |
will not be helped at all. If you miles away and this is exactly what | :42:29. | :42:33. | |
Philip Hammond wants to see. This is a four-bedroom family home. 94 new | :42:34. | :42:36. | |
houses are being built here on the edge of candle and unusually, half | :42:37. | :42:43. | |
of them are affordable homes. Any extra money is good news. I'm | :42:44. | :42:48. | |
thinking in particular of the shift of emphasis from homeownership to | :42:49. | :42:53. | |
the suggestion that we want rented housing. It can only be seen as good | :42:54. | :42:57. | |
news for the whole sector. Philip Hammond says he wants economy to be | :42:58. | :43:03. | |
match fit for Brexit. That includes investing in better broadband and | :43:04. | :43:07. | |
new homes like these. He also believes that every part of the | :43:08. | :43:13. | |
country should get its share of economic success. Political | :43:14. | :43:16. | |
opponents however say they are already struggling to get vital | :43:17. | :43:21. | |
investment. It's a frustration to us that we are not getting the funding | :43:22. | :43:26. | |
we need. The local enterprise partnership, bidding for ?165 | :43:27. | :43:33. | |
million for Cumbria, and we understand we have a small figure of | :43:34. | :43:38. | |
?16 million. But those behind the bid say politicians need to face | :43:39. | :43:42. | |
reality. Devolution is the only game in town and if we don't want to play | :43:43. | :43:46. | |
that game, we are going to get left behind. That was spelt out quite | :43:47. | :43:49. | |
clearly by Greg Clark earlier in the year. He has gone and done exactly | :43:50. | :43:54. | |
what we were told would happen. While some in this idyllic part of | :43:55. | :43:58. | |
the Northwest clearly feel neglected by Westminster, others believe the | :43:59. | :44:03. | |
opportunities are there to get the investment they desperately need. | :44:04. | :44:08. | |
The money Cumbria was hoping for is part of the government's ?1.8 | :44:09. | :44:13. | |
billion regional growth fund. Eleanor spoke to the Northern | :44:14. | :44:17. | |
Powerhouse investor and asked if the county was getting its fair share. | :44:18. | :44:23. | |
?556 million of that is going to the North of England. That is the lions | :44:24. | :44:28. | |
share that budget. This was a fund which was over bid by three or four | :44:29. | :44:31. | |
times so it's not a surprise if local enterprise partnerships | :44:32. | :44:35. | |
putting bids in above their fair share will be disappointed. The | :44:36. | :44:38. | |
truth is on Cumbria, they will receive more money per head than | :44:39. | :44:44. | |
London. Is it right that those areas with elected mayors are getting more | :44:45. | :44:49. | |
cash? When you have a directly elected structure through these | :44:50. | :44:51. | |
mayoral combined authorities, what you have their is you have a | :44:52. | :44:55. | |
demonstration that everybody is working together to the same | :44:56. | :45:00. | |
economic goals will stop people working strategically. It makes | :45:01. | :45:03. | |
sense to invest where people have come together with a definite plan | :45:04. | :45:07. | |
for the region. We are being told that system won't work for them so | :45:08. | :45:11. | |
isn't it an fair they should lose out in terms of support for the | :45:12. | :45:16. | |
local economy? We're putting record investment into transport and into | :45:17. | :45:19. | |
infrastructure across the North, regardless of whether or not people | :45:20. | :45:23. | |
have a mayor. Where there are Merrill structures, there are | :45:24. | :45:25. | |
additional funding pots that come with that, precisely because areas | :45:26. | :45:32. | |
have demonstrated they have a plan and can deliver on it. When we give | :45:33. | :45:36. | |
them this extra investment, they can guarantee they will create new jobs, | :45:37. | :45:39. | |
new housing and employment developments. That is the reason why | :45:40. | :45:50. | |
there are these investments. David, we heard the concerns in | :45:51. | :45:52. | |
Cumbria. Do you feel Cheshire was also in danger of being left behind? | :45:53. | :45:58. | |
We need to make sure we create a combined authority. I know Cheshire | :45:59. | :46:02. | |
Cheshire West want to. Now it is Cheshire West want to. Now it is | :46:03. | :46:06. | |
down to Warrington. It's vital we do because we could collaborate with | :46:07. | :46:08. | |
Manchester, Liverpool and challenge where we are. There needs to be that | :46:09. | :46:13. | |
counterweight. That's the missing ingredient at the moment. It's | :46:14. | :46:18. | |
important we take it forward. I appeal to councillors to think about | :46:19. | :46:21. | |
the opportunities. I think we can achieve something really good for | :46:22. | :46:26. | |
our region. You don't feel it is focused too much on big cities? | :46:27. | :46:31. | |
Possibly is currently but credit to Manchester, they've led the way. | :46:32. | :46:34. | |
Others are trying to catch up. What we need to do now is make sure we | :46:35. | :46:39. | |
get the city and county working together because their strengths in | :46:40. | :46:43. | |
both areas. When we together and work together, we can achieve | :46:44. | :46:46. | |
amazing things. That's what we need to do. Lucy, what is your view on | :46:47. | :46:51. | |
Shire counties? Do they need to get their act together? They definitely | :46:52. | :46:55. | |
need to have extra support and investment. There's no question of | :46:56. | :46:58. | |
that. But I think what we've seen over the last few years, and it's a | :46:59. | :47:02. | |
welcome development, is that the government is prepared to go the | :47:03. | :47:05. | |
speed of the fastest, not wait for everyone to catch up and only then | :47:06. | :47:11. | |
start issuing these sorts of funds when everybody is at the same level. | :47:12. | :47:14. | |
Allowing Manchester to lead the way, which it has been doing, and we've | :47:15. | :47:18. | |
got lots of extra powers in Manchester that other places won't | :47:19. | :47:23. | |
get, we can demonstrate the model and transform the way in which we | :47:24. | :47:27. | |
deliver services. And hopefully transform the local economy. Other | :47:28. | :47:30. | |
places can catch up. That would be a good thing for them as well. Back to | :47:31. | :47:35. | |
the Autumn Statement. We have something here, the Northern | :47:36. | :47:39. | |
Powerhouse strategy. Things you like in here? I mention some of those at | :47:40. | :47:42. | |
the beginning. There is extra focus on infrastructure and that ?556 | :47:43. | :47:48. | |
million that will be made available for the North. There is a really | :47:49. | :47:51. | |
clear narrative there that everybody is being brought into. We have | :47:52. | :47:54. | |
political differences but when we get together, we can create | :47:55. | :47:58. | |
something that can be globally significant. There is a huge prize | :47:59. | :48:01. | |
and that's why we've got to make sure in Cheshire we get a combined | :48:02. | :48:04. | |
authority and we work with Manchester and Liverpool. I think it | :48:05. | :48:09. | |
sets out a good strategy. Whatever you think of this, at least the | :48:10. | :48:13. | |
government has a strategy. Does Labour have anything similar? | :48:14. | :48:17. | |
Absolutely. We support the push of the Northern Powerhouse. There has | :48:18. | :48:22. | |
been a concern on my part and on the part of the Labour Party since | :48:23. | :48:25. | |
Theresa May took over that we saw for a few weeks there are lots of | :48:26. | :48:30. | |
quiet evening on the idea of a Northern Powerhouse. I was told that | :48:31. | :48:35. | |
one of the ministers in that department wasn't allowed the phrase | :48:36. | :48:38. | |
Northern Powerhouse in a press release. Number ten wouldn't clear | :48:39. | :48:41. | |
it for a while because the emphasis now seems to be on the engine of the | :48:42. | :48:49. | |
West Midlands or Birmingham. If they can carry on that emphasis, because | :48:50. | :48:54. | |
I do think it's been a William important not just PR emphasise, | :48:55. | :48:57. | |
although that has been important to get attention to the north, but it | :48:58. | :49:01. | |
has come with devolution and powers. We need to see that accelerating. | :49:02. | :49:06. | |
Recent evidence has shown the gap between London and the south-east | :49:07. | :49:11. | |
and the North and the is at its greatest ever. This is an urgent | :49:12. | :49:15. | |
task to make sure we've got that economic growth here in the | :49:16. | :49:20. | |
north-west that we need. And with high-speed two and further plans in | :49:21. | :49:25. | |
place for better links between Manchester and Leeds, these are | :49:26. | :49:28. | |
really meaningful infrastructure changes which are going to take | :49:29. | :49:31. | |
place. I think it's going to help move these things forward. This is a | :49:32. | :49:35. | |
classic example whether you are red or blue, when to make sure this | :49:36. | :49:39. | |
works. There is strength in collaboration on this. I am sure you | :49:40. | :49:44. | |
in Westminster and in your in Westminster and in your | :49:45. | :49:47. | |
constituencies but in the nation, we're not producing enough according | :49:48. | :49:49. | |
to the Chancellor. He is providing a to the Chancellor. He is providing a | :49:50. | :49:53. | |
?23 billion investment fund and ?2 billion for research and | :49:54. | :49:57. | |
development. Will the Northwest's crucial science sector get what they | :49:58. | :50:02. | |
need? From malaria treatments tested in | :50:03. | :50:07. | |
Liverpool to ultra thin graphene discovered in Manchester, our | :50:08. | :50:10. | |
science and technology sector is having a global impact. But is it in | :50:11. | :50:15. | |
a fair fight with the Golden Triangle of Oxford, Cambridge and | :50:16. | :50:20. | |
London just a few hundred miles away? This project can be more than | :50:21. | :50:23. | |
just a transport link. It can become a transformational Tech corridor. | :50:24. | :50:28. | |
The Chancellor promised Oxford and Cambridge new road and railway is | :50:29. | :50:32. | |
this week. He also promised ?2 billion for research and development | :50:33. | :50:36. | |
in the UK tech sector but will that cash be heading up here? The private | :50:37. | :50:41. | |
sector spends double what the public sector spends. The government spends | :50:42. | :50:49. | |
7% of R and D in the north. We would like to see the government meet that | :50:50. | :50:54. | |
more pounds spent in the North. It more pounds spent in the North. It | :50:55. | :50:58. | |
would be very helpful for the Northern economy. This business in | :50:59. | :51:03. | |
Runcorn helps provide the science skills to change food waste. Is | :51:04. | :51:06. | |
looking to expand but bosses are uncertain about the final details of | :51:07. | :51:11. | |
the money. Particularly with Brexit, we are concerned about the fund | :51:12. | :51:14. | |
availability for research and development. Although new programmes | :51:15. | :51:19. | |
have been notified in the Chancellor potluck statement, it's not clear | :51:20. | :51:22. | |
how quickly they will be brought to bear and will allow us to develop | :51:23. | :51:30. | |
further. -- Autumn Statement. Staff gravitating from science parks like | :51:31. | :51:33. | |
this one in Runcorn towards London is a problem. If think tank report | :51:34. | :51:39. | |
this week highlighted the so call brain drain, 13 times as many | :51:40. | :51:42. | |
graduates had to London compared with Manchester. Malaria is a | :51:43. | :51:48. | |
terrible thing that kills 600,000 children every year. Bill Gates | :51:49. | :51:54. | |
found his way to the Liverpool School of tropical medicine to help | :51:55. | :51:55. | |
fund its malaria research but some fund its malaria research but some | :51:56. | :51:59. | |
graduates have not been as willing as him to head north. Once we get | :52:00. | :52:05. | |
people here, they don't go away and Oxford and Cambridge don't get them | :52:06. | :52:09. | |
back. It's getting people to realise that when they actually come here, | :52:10. | :52:13. | |
they get a better standard of living, there is clearly a centre of | :52:14. | :52:16. | |
expertise you that people ought to be gravitating to and working with. | :52:17. | :52:20. | |
That is happening to an extent but don't think government is | :52:21. | :52:23. | |
recognising it as much as it could or should. The School of tropical | :52:24. | :52:30. | |
medicine is building a new ?25 million laboratory. That they won | :52:31. | :52:32. | |
support from the government to enable them to fill it with staff, | :52:33. | :52:33. | |
doing life changing work. doing life changing work. | :52:34. | :52:39. | |
Joining us now is Andrew Carter from the Centre for cities, which has | :52:40. | :52:43. | |
worked with areas including Warrington and Manchester on | :52:44. | :52:46. | |
economic growth. Cheap released a report this week which was stark on | :52:47. | :52:51. | |
web graduates head. Explain what the brain drain is about. We are | :52:52. | :52:55. | |
interested in how graduates move around, both to study and where they | :52:56. | :53:01. | |
go after work. What we found was 25% of new graduates that are working | :53:02. | :53:06. | |
six months after they finish university, they are working in | :53:07. | :53:10. | |
London. To give you some sense, the numbers for Manchester and Liverpool | :53:11. | :53:15. | |
5% and 2%. There is quite a large difference between this graduates | :53:16. | :53:19. | |
and where they end up as opposed to where they study. However, I think | :53:20. | :53:22. | |
it's important to remember that there is good news for the | :53:23. | :53:25. | |
Northwest, particularly when you look at Manchester and Liverpool. | :53:26. | :53:29. | |
Both of them gain graduates when you think about those graduates that | :53:30. | :53:32. | |
move off to go somewhere else or they actually stay there because | :53:33. | :53:40. | |
they are born there and studied. Both Liverpool and Manchester are | :53:41. | :53:43. | |
quite good gainers in the sense they have more graduates at the end of | :53:44. | :53:45. | |
the period than they did at the start. There are things to build on. | :53:46. | :53:48. | |
Nevertheless, they are mindful on the poll of London. It's quite a | :53:49. | :53:53. | |
challenge for our politicians. Is that something government can do a | :53:54. | :53:58. | |
lot about? Do businesses have to do more to attract people to Manchester | :53:59. | :54:02. | |
and Liverpool? Absolutely right. What you clearly find is that | :54:03. | :54:08. | |
graduates that do move move for economic opportunities. Jobs is | :54:09. | :54:12. | |
important. Actually, careers as well. Often, it's not the first job | :54:13. | :54:15. | |
you get that you necessarily move for, it's the second or the third. I | :54:16. | :54:19. | |
think that the vital difference between places like London and maybe | :54:20. | :54:24. | |
some other places. They can offer this service -- second and third job | :54:25. | :54:28. | |
and they wage increases that people are looking for. It's thinking about | :54:29. | :54:33. | |
how we can create more graduate jobs, more high skilled jobs in our | :54:34. | :54:38. | |
cities, Liverpool, Manchester, Warrington and these other places. | :54:39. | :54:42. | |
I'll come back to you shortly. David, are we to London centric? The | :54:43. | :54:49. | |
amazing thing is we've only been talking about the Northern | :54:50. | :54:51. | |
Powerhouse for the last two years. The agenda has moved on | :54:52. | :54:56. | |
dramatically, the narrative has changed, the infrastructure has | :54:57. | :54:59. | |
changed. That said, there is more to do to make sure we've got more | :55:00. | :55:03. | |
really attractive growth prospects in the region. If we can get | :55:04. | :55:10. | |
Manchester moving, even better. Then we've got AstraZeneca in | :55:11. | :55:12. | |
Macclesfield with great opportunities there. They are an | :55:13. | :55:16. | |
example of a company where jobs have gone down south. They moved their | :55:17. | :55:20. | |
research and development function to Cambridge. They do good science I | :55:21. | :55:26. | |
understand. A lot of people didn't want to move down because the point | :55:27. | :55:29. | |
that is being made is, once people get established in the north and | :55:30. | :55:32. | |
they see the quality of life here and the great people and the | :55:33. | :55:35. | |
countryside, why would they want to go anywhere else? It's the same with | :55:36. | :55:37. | |
the BBC moving up here. The number the BBC moving up here. The number | :55:38. | :55:42. | |
of people who said we will try it and now they are really pleased | :55:43. | :55:45. | |
they've made the change. There is science in your constituency, too. | :55:46. | :55:51. | |
The government are backing companies in your constituency. We are seeing | :55:52. | :55:55. | |
more investment but it needs to be considerably more because the point | :55:56. | :56:00. | |
that your guest was making was a very good one. People need to have | :56:01. | :56:04. | |
careers in Manchester and in the north-west that we do have some good | :56:05. | :56:09. | |
companies and good initiatives, things like graphene or the health | :56:10. | :56:15. | |
and life sciences in Manchester and Cheshire. But you need the large | :56:16. | :56:24. | |
grouping of effective companies and government institutions that people | :56:25. | :56:28. | |
can have a whole career here. That's why we need a stronger industrial | :56:29. | :56:31. | |
strategy around some of these key sectors for the region. We need | :56:32. | :56:36. | |
backed up by the Right kind of investment in the right way, whether | :56:37. | :56:39. | |
it be in transport infrastructure or research, grants and science grants | :56:40. | :56:45. | |
which still massively go to London and the south-east compared with the | :56:46. | :56:50. | |
Northwest. That's unacceptable. Andrew, we've heard a lot about | :56:51. | :56:54. | |
productivity. What is that? Let's use an example. Everybody likes | :56:55. | :57:01. | |
baking nowadays. In an hour, in the UK, let's say the average worker | :57:02. | :57:06. | |
produces two cakes in that hour. When you look at other places like | :57:07. | :57:11. | |
France or America, they are producing three cakes or 3.5 cakes | :57:12. | :57:16. | |
in that hour. If you look at places like Manchester or Liverpool and | :57:17. | :57:22. | |
Burnley, Blackburn and Warrington, those sorts of places are all below | :57:23. | :57:26. | |
the UK average on productivity. Infrastructure is very important but | :57:27. | :57:30. | |
the big issue for the Northwest and particularly for its cities are the | :57:31. | :57:35. | |
low skills of much of its resident population. We should be investing | :57:36. | :57:40. | |
in our schools and our people to improve the skills base of those | :57:41. | :57:43. | |
people. Those people with higher skills are more productive. Thank | :57:44. | :57:48. | |
you very much for joining us. We need to up our game here. That is | :57:49. | :57:54. | |
clear. We are pushing hard on apprenticeships. When you look at | :57:55. | :57:57. | |
technical training over decades, we've not done a good enough job | :57:58. | :57:59. | |
there and that is now moving forward. I think that's exciting. | :58:00. | :58:04. | |
There is an opportunity now with the exchange rate being lowered to do | :58:05. | :58:08. | |
more exports. What you find is that more businesses export, they become | :58:09. | :58:13. | |
more productive. They learn from other businesses and find ways to | :58:14. | :58:17. | |
lower their unit costs. The thing is, if you talk about productivity, | :58:18. | :58:20. | |
that's one thing but that what that will eat it was more jobs and also | :58:21. | :58:24. | |
sustainably increased wages. That is what we will want to see. Now it's | :58:25. | :58:28. | |
about taking the strategies forward to deliver on that. That's the big | :58:29. | :58:33. | |
thing we've heard about, wages and stagnation of wages. That needs to | :58:34. | :58:37. | |
be tackled. This was the key message out of the Autumn Statement, what a | :58:38. | :58:41. | |
decade we've got ahead of stagnant wages whilst costs are rising and | :58:42. | :58:46. | |
house prices are going up. This key issue of investing in people is | :58:47. | :58:50. | |
absolutely critical and I'm afraid that for all their talk, the | :58:51. | :58:54. | |
government are going backwards in that regard. We are seeing for the | :58:55. | :58:57. | |
first time in over 25 years cuts to schools budgets, further education | :58:58. | :59:03. | |
has seen the budget slashed by 30% over the last six years. The early | :59:04. | :59:07. | |
years, where social mobility and where people's life chances are set, | :59:08. | :59:12. | |
the equality in the early years is going backwards under this | :59:13. | :59:15. | |
government. The social mobility report which was at last week that | :59:16. | :59:18. | |
David damning indictment of what this government are doing on social | :59:19. | :59:22. | |
mobility is a key part of the story as well. We've got to make sure all | :59:23. | :59:26. | |
our people, not just those that are good enough to rise to the top but | :59:27. | :59:30. | |
that everybody is able to upscale and to live a life to their full | :59:31. | :59:37. | |
potential. We are going to have to leave it there. Time for the rest of | :59:38. | :59:42. | |
the week's news now. She was Kevin Fitzpatrick. | :59:43. | :59:49. | |
Bad decisions, poor attitudes and chronic staff shortages. The | :59:50. | :59:53. | |
findings of a report into these hospitals which the trust tried to | :59:54. | :59:57. | |
keep secret. We have investigated thoroughly. We've met with the | :59:58. | :00:03. | |
families and I hope we've dealt with them sincerely and sensitively. | :00:04. | :00:08. | |
David Morris denied claiming expenses for journeys in his | :00:09. | :00:11. | |
constituency while he was away on foreign trips. He blamed an | :00:12. | :00:17. | |
antiquated expenses system. South Lackland councils accused of | :00:18. | :00:20. | |
dragging its feet over payments to protect homes from future flooding. | :00:21. | :00:27. | |
This couple are still waiting. It is prolonged and prolonged. We are | :00:28. | :00:31. | |
getting nowhere. We've tried to make phone calls and nothing happens. The | :00:32. | :00:35. | |
women's equality party is holding its first-ever party conference in | :00:36. | :00:40. | |
Manchester. The leader of Trafford Council has been selected as the | :00:41. | :00:43. | |
Conservative candidate for mayor of greater candidate -- magister. | :00:44. | :00:50. | |
The election is in May. That's all we've got time for this week. Thanks | :00:51. | :00:55. | |
to my guests. I will hand you back to Andrew. | :00:56. | :00:57. | |
have got to make sure London is open. Thank you. Andrew, back to | :00:58. | :01:01. | |
you. Is Theresa May serious | :01:02. | :01:07. | |
about curbing executive pay? Who will be crowned Nigel Farage's | :01:08. | :01:08. | |
successor as Ukip leader? And can the Lib Dems pull off | :01:09. | :01:12. | |
a by-election upset in Richmond? So,,, on pay talk about the | :01:13. | :01:40. | |
executive of what executives get compared to the average worker in | :01:41. | :01:43. | |
the company, giving shareholders real power to vote down pay rises if | :01:44. | :01:47. | |
they don't like them, which is pretty much what Ed Miliband | :01:48. | :01:50. | |
proposed in the general election in 2015. Is she serious about this? She | :01:51. | :02:00. | |
is very serious, and the Tory party probably does owe Ed Miliband an | :02:01. | :02:03. | |
apology for trashing his ideas and 2015 and then putting them all up | :02:04. | :02:08. | |
for votes in November 20 16. She is very serious, and this all comes | :02:09. | :02:11. | |
back to her desperate fear that unless capitalism reforms itself and | :02:12. | :02:14. | |
becomes more acceptable to the just about managing or even 78% of the | :02:15. | :02:21. | |
country who are not earning vast wealth at anywhere near the figures | :02:22. | :02:24. | |
you see in the City, serious things will happen and the political sense | :02:25. | :02:30. | |
of trust will implode. She has already been bartered down by her | :02:31. | :02:34. | |
own Cabinet on this. She wanted to go further and make workers on the | :02:35. | :02:37. | |
board mandatory. They have managed to stop that. What will her fallback | :02:38. | :02:44. | |
position be on workers on the board if she is not able to get it into | :02:45. | :02:52. | |
some claw? We would like to have workers on the board, but whatever | :02:53. | :02:56. | |
they do on the board there will have no voting powers on the board. When | :02:57. | :03:00. | |
you look at what was leaked out over the weekend, that we should know the | :03:01. | :03:04. | |
ratio of the top to the average and that shareholders who own the | :03:05. | :03:10. | |
company should determine, in the end, the highest-paid salaries, you | :03:11. | :03:16. | |
kind of think, what could the possible objection be to any of | :03:17. | :03:22. | |
that? Two things. One, I agree with Tom that she is deadly serious about | :03:23. | :03:27. | |
this agenda and it comes under the banner, that sentence in the party | :03:28. | :03:31. | |
conference speech about "It's time to focus on the good that government | :03:32. | :03:36. | |
can do". She is by instinct more of an interventionist than Cameron and | :03:37. | :03:40. | |
Osborne. But she is incredibly cautious, whether it is through the | :03:41. | :03:43. | |
internal constraints of opposition within Cabinet, or her own small C | :03:44. | :03:50. | |
Conservative caution in implementing this stuff. Part of the problem is | :03:51. | :03:54. | |
the practicalities. George Osborne commission will Hutton to do a | :03:55. | :03:59. | |
report which came out with similar proposals, which were never | :04:00. | :04:02. | |
implemented. It is quite hard to enforce. It will antagonise business | :04:03. | :04:08. | |
leaders when she's to woo them again in this Brexit furore. So there are | :04:09. | :04:12. | |
problems with it. And judging by what has happened so far, my guess | :04:13. | :04:17. | |
is that the aim will be genuinely bold and interesting, and the | :04:18. | :04:20. | |
implementation incredibly cautious. Does it matter if she annoys some | :04:21. | :04:25. | |
business leaders? Isn't that part of her brand? Will there be problems on | :04:26. | :04:31. | |
the Tory backbenches with it? I think there will be and I think it | :04:32. | :04:34. | |
does matter at this sensitive time for when we are positioning | :04:35. | :04:37. | |
ourselves as a country and whether we are going to brand ourselves as a | :04:38. | :04:42. | |
great city of business, implementing quite interventionist policies. Any | :04:43. | :04:45. | |
suggestion that the government can control how much the top earners | :04:46. | :04:50. | |
get, I think would be received in a hostile way. What would be wrong | :04:51. | :04:54. | |
with the shareholders, who own the company, determining the pay of the | :04:55. | :04:59. | |
higher hands, the executives? Morally, you can absolutely make | :05:00. | :05:02. | |
that argument but to business leaders, they will not like it. | :05:03. | :05:07. | |
Ultimately, this will not come down to more than a row of beans. There | :05:08. | :05:10. | |
was a huge debate about whether there should be quotas of women on | :05:11. | :05:14. | |
boards. In the end, that never happened. All we get is figures. But | :05:15. | :05:20. | |
quotas of women, for which there is a case and a case against too, that | :05:21. | :05:26. | |
was a government mandate. This is not, this is simply empowering | :05:27. | :05:29. | |
shareholders who own the company to determine the pay of the people they | :05:30. | :05:36. | |
hire. There is a strong moral argument for it. Strong economic | :05:37. | :05:40. | |
argument. But the Tory backbenchers will not like this. The downside is | :05:41. | :05:46. | |
that this is a world where companies are thinking about upping sticks to | :05:47. | :05:50. | |
Europe. No, they say they are thinking of that. Not one has done | :05:51. | :05:56. | |
it yet. Others have made massive investments in this country. But is | :05:57. | :06:01. | |
it not an incentive for those making these threats to actually do it? In | :06:02. | :06:07. | |
Europe, bankers' pay is now mandated by Brussels. It is a vivid way of | :06:08. | :06:12. | |
showing you are addressing the issue of inequality. I think she will go | :06:13. | :06:21. | |
with it, but let's move on to Ukip. I think we will get the result | :06:22. | :06:26. | |
tomorrow. There are the top three candidates. Paul Nuttall, Suzanne | :06:27. | :06:33. | |
Evans and on my right, John Reid Evans. One of them will be the next | :06:34. | :06:37. | |
leader. Who is going to win? It is widely predicted to be Paul Nuttall | :06:38. | :06:42. | |
and is probably the outcome that the Labour Party fears most. Paul | :06:43. | :06:46. | |
Nuttall is a very effective communicator. He is not a household | :06:47. | :06:50. | |
name, far from it, but people will begin to learn more about him and | :06:51. | :06:56. | |
find that he is actually quite a strong leader. Can people Ukip | :06:57. | :07:01. | |
together again after this shambolic period since the referendum? If | :07:02. | :07:09. | |
anyone can, he can. And his brand of working collar, Northern Ukip is the | :07:10. | :07:13. | |
thing that will work for them. Do you think he is the favourite? It | :07:14. | :07:19. | |
would be amazing if he doesn't win. His greatest problem will be getting | :07:20. | :07:23. | |
Nigel Farage off his back. He is going on a speaking tour of North | :07:24. | :07:30. | |
America. A long speaking tour. Ukip won this EU referendum. They had the | :07:31. | :07:33. | |
chance to hoover up these discontented Labour voters in the | :07:34. | :07:38. | |
north, and all he has done is associated with Ukip with Farage. | :07:39. | :07:42. | |
But Nigel Farage is fed up of Ukip and will be glad to be hands of it. | :07:43. | :07:48. | |
The bigger problem is money. If it is Paul Nuttall, and we don't know | :07:49. | :07:54. | |
the results yet, but he is the favourite, if it is him, I would | :07:55. | :07:57. | |
suggest that that is the result Labour is frightened of most. To be | :07:58. | :08:01. | |
honest, I think they are frightened of Ukip whatever the result. | :08:02. | :08:05. | |
Possibly with good cause. The reason I qualify that is that what you call | :08:06. | :08:12. | |
a shambles over the summer has been something that goes beyond Monty | :08:13. | :08:15. | |
Python in its absurdity and madness. That calls into question whether it | :08:16. | :08:21. | |
can function as a political party when you have what has gone on. The | :08:22. | :08:26. | |
number of leaders itself has been an act of madness. In a context which | :08:27. | :08:33. | |
should be fantastic for them. They have won a referendum. There is a | :08:34. | :08:37. | |
debate about what form Brexit should take, it is a dream for them, and | :08:38. | :08:41. | |
they have gone bonkers. If he can turn it around, I agree that he is a | :08:42. | :08:45. | |
powerful media communicator, and then it is a threat to Labour. But | :08:46. | :08:49. | |
he has got to show that first. Indeed. The by-election in Richmond | :08:50. | :08:54. | |
in south-west London, called by Zac Goldsmith over Heathrow. Has it | :08:55. | :08:59. | |
turned out to be a by-election about Heathrow, or has it turned into a | :09:00. | :09:03. | |
by-election, which is what the Lib Dems wanted, about Brexit? We will | :09:04. | :09:09. | |
know on Thursday. If the Lib Dems win, they will turn it into an EU | :09:10. | :09:12. | |
referendum. It seems incredibly close now. The Lib Dems are swamping | :09:13. | :09:18. | |
Richmond. They had 1000 activists there yesterday. That is getting on | :09:19. | :09:21. | |
for 100th of the population of the place! If the Lib Dems don't manage | :09:22. | :09:26. | |
to win on Thursday and don't manage to turn it into an EU referendum | :09:27. | :09:30. | |
despite all their efforts, it will probably be a disaster for the | :09:31. | :09:38. | |
party. What do you hear, Isabel? I hear that the Lib Dems have | :09:39. | :09:42. | |
absolutely swamped the constituency, but this may backfire. I saw a bit | :09:43. | :09:46. | |
of this myself, living in Witney, when the Lib Dems also swamped and | :09:47. | :09:51. | |
people began to get fed up of their aggressive tactics. I understand | :09:52. | :09:57. | |
that Zac Goldsmith is cautiously optimistic that he will pull this | :09:58. | :10:03. | |
one off. Quick stab at the result? I don't know. But we are entering a | :10:04. | :10:11. | |
period when by-elections are acquiring significant again. If the | :10:12. | :10:15. | |
Lib Dems were to make a game, it would breathe life into that near | :10:16. | :10:21. | |
moribund party like nothing else. Similarly, other by-elections in | :10:22. | :10:25. | |
this shapeless political world we are in are going to become | :10:26. | :10:29. | |
significant. We don't know if we are covering it live on Thursday night | :10:30. | :10:32. | |
yet because we have to find at the time they are going to declare. | :10:33. | :10:38. | |
Richmond are quite late in declaring, but if it is in the early | :10:39. | :10:42. | |
hours, that is fine. If it is on breakfast television, they be not. I | :10:43. | :10:47. | |
want to show you this. Michael Gove was on the Andrew Marr Show this | :10:48. | :10:52. | |
morning. In the now notorious comment that I made, I was actually | :10:53. | :10:56. | |
cut off in midstream, as politicians often. The point I made was not that | :10:57. | :10:58. | |
all experts are that is nonsense. Expert engineers, doctors and | :10:59. | :11:09. | |
physicists are not wrong. But there is a subclass of experts, | :11:10. | :11:12. | |
particularly social scientists, who have to reflect on some of the | :11:13. | :11:17. | |
mistakes they have made. And the recession, which was predicted that | :11:18. | :11:20. | |
we would have if we voted to leave, has gone like a puff of smoke. So | :11:21. | :11:27. | |
economic experts, he talks about. The Chancellor has based all of his | :11:28. | :11:30. | |
forward predictions in this Autumn Statement on the economic expert | :11:31. | :11:37. | |
forecasters. The Office for Budget Responsibility has said it is 50-50, | :11:38. | :11:43. | |
which is the toss of a coin. But what was he supposed to do? You | :11:44. | :11:47. | |
would ideally have to have a Budget that had several sets of scenarios, | :11:48. | :11:53. | |
and that is impossible. Crystal ball territory. But you do wonder if | :11:54. | :12:00. | |
governments are right to do so much of their fiscal projections on the | :12:01. | :12:03. | |
basis of forecasts which turn out to be wrong. They have nothing else to | :12:04. | :12:09. | |
go on. The Treasury forecast is to be wrong. No doubt the OBR forecast | :12:10. | :12:14. | |
will prove not to be exact. As you say, they admitted that they are | :12:15. | :12:17. | |
navigating through fog at the moment. But he also added that it | :12:18. | :12:22. | |
was fog caused by Brexit. So Brexit, even if you accept that these | :12:23. | :12:26. | |
forecasts might be wrong, is causing such a level of uncertainty. He put | :12:27. | :12:33. | |
the figure at 60 billion. That could come to haunt him. He hasn't got a | :12:34. | :12:44. | |
clue. He admitted it. He said, Parliament mandates me to come up | :12:45. | :12:47. | |
with something, so I am going to give you a number. But I wouldn't | :12:48. | :12:50. | |
trust it if I were you, he basically said. I agree with you. The man who | :12:51. | :12:56. | |
borrowed 122 billion more off the back of a coin toss was Philip | :12:57. | :12:59. | |
Hammond. It begs the question, what does that say about the confidence | :13:00. | :13:03. | |
Philip Hammond has in his own government's renegotiation? Not a | :13:04. | :13:09. | |
huge amount. I agree. Philip Hammond quoted the OBR figures. He basically | :13:10. | :13:13. | |
said, this is uncertain and it looks bad, and on we go with it. It is a | :13:14. | :13:19. | |
very interesting situation, he said. He was for Remain and he works in a | :13:20. | :13:24. | |
department which regards it as a disaster, whatever everyone else | :13:25. | :13:29. | |
thinks. I have just been told we are covering the by-election. We are | :13:30. | :13:32. | |
part of the constitution. Jo Coburn will have more | :13:33. | :13:34. | |
Daily Politics tomorrow And I'll be back here on BBC One | :13:35. | :13:36. | |
next Sunday at 11. Remember - if it's Sunday, | :13:37. | :13:40. | |
it's the Sunday Politics. to signify the Africans | :13:41. | :14:14. | |
who were here. The story of Henry VIII | :14:15. | :14:18. | |
and his six wives | :14:19. | :14:45. |