Browse content similar to 27/10/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Morning, folks. Welcome to the Sunday Politics. Hope you enjoyed | :00:37. | :00:41. | |
the extra hour in bed, and that you've realised it's not 12:45. It's | :00:42. | :00:47. | |
11:45! It's getting stormy outside. But they're already battening down | :00:48. | :00:50. | |
the hatches at Number Ten because coalition splits are back, with | :00:51. | :00:52. | |
bust-ups over free schools and power bills. We'll speak to the Lib Dems, | :00:53. | :00:57. | |
and ask Labour who's conning whom over energy. | :00:58. | :01:01. | |
EU leaders have been meeting in Brussels. But how's David Cameron | :01:02. | :01:04. | |
getting on with that plan to change our relationship with Europe? We | :01:05. | :01:15. | |
were there to ask him. Have we got any powers back yet? DS! | :01:16. | :01:18. | |
Foreign companies own everything from our energy companies to our | :01:19. | :01:20. | |
And in Northern Ireland we talk to railways. Does it | :01:21. | :01:25. | |
And in Northern Ireland we talk to the new Shadow Secretary of State, | :01:26. | :01:28. | |
Ivan Lewis, who's already annoyed the government over allegations it's | :01:29. | :01:30. | |
becoming complacent about what's going on here. Join me in half an | :01:31. | :01:33. | |
hour. going on here. Join me in half an | :01:34. | :01:34. | |
as many daily journeys made by bus than by tube, so why is the | :01:35. | :01:37. | |
investment in buses not keeping pace? | :01:38. | :01:45. | |
And with me, three journalists who've bravely agreed to hunker down | :01:46. | :01:48. | |
in the studio while Britain braces itself for massive storm winds, | :01:49. | :01:50. | |
tweeting their political forecasts with all the accuracy of Michael | :01:51. | :01:55. | |
Lewis, Janan Ganesh and Nick Watt. Lewis, Janan Ganesh and Nick Watt. | :01:56. | :02:01. | |
Now, sometimes coalition splits are over-egged, or dare we say even | :02:02. | :02:05. | |
occasionally stage-managed. But this week, we've seen what looks like the | :02:06. | :02:09. | |
genuine article. It turns out Nick Clegg has his doubts about the | :02:10. | :02:12. | |
coalition's flagship free schools policy. David Cameron doesn't much | :02:13. | :02:15. | |
like the green levies on our energy bills championed by the Lib Dems. | :02:16. | :02:19. | |
Neither of them seems to have bothered to tell the other that they | :02:20. | :02:23. | |
had their doubts. Who better to discuss these flare-ups than Lib Dem | :02:24. | :02:27. | |
Deputy Leader Simon Hughes? He joins me now. Welcome. Good morning. The | :02:28. | :02:37. | |
Lib Dems spent three years of sticking up for the coalition when | :02:38. | :02:42. | |
times were grim. Explain to me the logic of splitting from them when | :02:43. | :02:46. | |
times look better. We will stick with it for five years. It is | :02:47. | :02:50. | |
working arrangement, but not surprisingly, where there right | :02:51. | :02:54. | |
areas on which we disagree over where to go next, we will stand up. | :02:55. | :02:59. | |
It is going to be hard enough for the Lib Dems to get any credit for | :03:00. | :03:03. | |
the recovery, what ever it is. It will be even harder if you seem to | :03:04. | :03:09. | |
be semidetached and picky. The coalition has led on economic | :03:10. | :03:13. | |
policy, some of which were entirely from our stable. The one you have | :03:14. | :03:19. | |
heard about most often, a Lib Dem initiative, was to take people on | :03:20. | :03:24. | |
blowing comes out of tax. The recovery would not have happened, | :03:25. | :03:26. | |
there would not have been confidence in Britain, had there not been a | :03:27. | :03:31. | |
coalition government with us in it, making sure the same policies | :03:32. | :03:36. | |
produced fair outcomes. We are not going to leave the credit for any | :03:37. | :03:40. | |
growth - and there has been very good news this week. We have played | :03:41. | :03:46. | |
a part in that, and without us, it would not have happened. Does it not | :03:47. | :03:49. | |
underline the trust problem you have? You promised to abolish | :03:50. | :03:54. | |
tuition fees. You oppose nuclear power, now you are cheerleading the | :03:55. | :04:00. | |
first multi-billion pounds investment in nuclear generation. | :04:01. | :04:05. | |
You are dying out on your enthusiasm on green levies, and now they are up | :04:06. | :04:10. | |
for renegotiation. Why should we trust a word you say? In relation to | :04:11. | :04:17. | |
green levies, as you well know, just under 10% is to do with helping | :04:18. | :04:27. | |
energy and helping people. Unless there is continuing investment in | :04:28. | :04:30. | |
renewables, we will not have the British produced energy at cheaper | :04:31. | :04:34. | |
cost to keep those bills down in the future. At cheaper cost? Explain | :04:35. | :04:39. | |
that to me. Off-shore energy is twice the market rate. The costs of | :04:40. | :04:48. | |
renewables will increasingly come down. We have fantastic capacity to | :04:49. | :04:53. | |
produce the energy and deliver lots of jobs in the process. The parts of | :04:54. | :04:58. | |
the energy bill that may be up for renegotiation seems to be the part | :04:59. | :05:02. | |
where we subsidise to help either poor people pay less, or where we do | :05:03. | :05:08. | |
other things. Too insulated the homes? Are you up to putting that to | :05:09. | :05:12. | |
general taxation? Wouldn't that be progressive? I would. It would be | :05:13. | :05:18. | |
progressive. I would like to do for energy bills what the Chancellor has | :05:19. | :05:22. | |
done for road traffic users, drivers, which is too fuelled motor | :05:23. | :05:29. | |
fuel -- to freeze new to fall. That would mean there would be an | :05:30. | :05:32. | |
immediate relief this year, not waiting for the election. So there | :05:33. | :05:38. | |
is a deal to be done there? Yes. We understand we have to take the | :05:39. | :05:43. | |
burden off the consumer, and also deal with the energy companies, who | :05:44. | :05:46. | |
look as if they are not paying all the tax they should be, and the | :05:47. | :05:50. | |
regulator, which doesn't regulate quickly enough to deal with the | :05:51. | :05:55. | |
issues coming down the track. We can toughen the regulator, and I hope | :05:56. | :05:59. | |
that the Chancellor, in the Autumn statement, was signalled that energy | :06:00. | :06:02. | |
companies will not be allowed to get away with not paying the taxes they | :06:03. | :06:06. | |
should. And this deal will allow energy prices to come down? Yes. How | :06:07. | :06:12. | |
could David Laws, one of your ministers, proudly defend the record | :06:13. | :06:18. | |
of unqualified teachers working in free schools, and then stand | :06:19. | :06:23. | |
side-by-side with Mr Clegg, as he says he is against them? David Laws | :06:24. | :06:28. | |
was not proudly defending the fact that it is unqualified teachers. He | :06:29. | :06:34. | |
said that some of the new, unqualified teachers in free schools | :06:35. | :06:39. | |
are doing a superb job. But you want to get rid of them? We want to make | :06:40. | :06:43. | |
sure that everybody coming into a free school ends up being qualified. | :06:44. | :06:50. | |
Ends up? Goes through a process that means they have qualifications. Just | :06:51. | :06:54. | |
as we said very clearly at the last election that the manifesto | :06:55. | :06:59. | |
curriculum in free schools should be the same as other schools. It looks | :07:00. | :07:03. | |
like Mr Clegg is picking a fight just for the sake of it. Mr Clegg | :07:04. | :07:10. | |
was taught by people who didn't have teaching qualifications in one of | :07:11. | :07:13. | |
the greatest schools in the land, if not the world. It didn't seem to do | :07:14. | :07:19. | |
him any harm. What is the problem? If you pay to go to a school, you | :07:20. | :07:23. | |
know what you're getting. But that is what a free school is. No, you | :07:24. | :07:31. | |
don't pay fees. A free school is parents taking the decisions, not | :07:32. | :07:34. | |
you, the politicians. We believe they would expect to guarantee is, | :07:35. | :07:39. | |
firstly that the minimum curriculum taught across the country is taught | :07:40. | :07:44. | |
in the free schools, and secondly, that the teachers there are | :07:45. | :07:47. | |
qualified. Someone who send their kids to private schools took a | :07:48. | :07:52. | |
decision to take -- to send their children there, even if the teachers | :07:53. | :07:58. | |
were unqualified, because they are experts in their field. Someone who | :07:59. | :08:03. | |
send their kids to free schools is because -- is their decision, not | :08:04. | :08:10. | |
yours. Because some of the free schools are new, and have never been | :08:11. | :08:13. | |
there before, parents need a guarantee that there are some basics | :08:14. | :08:19. | |
in place, whatever sort of school. So they need you to hold their hand? | :08:20. | :08:24. | |
It is not about holding hands, it is about having a minimum guarantee. | :08:25. | :08:28. | |
Our party made clear at our conference that this is a priority | :08:29. | :08:32. | |
for us. Nick Clegg reflects the view of the party, and I believe it is an | :08:33. | :08:37. | |
entirely rational thing to do. Nick Clegg complained that the Prime | :08:38. | :08:41. | |
Minister gave him only 30 minutes notice on the Prime Minister Buzz 's | :08:42. | :08:50. | |
U-turn on green levies. That is almost as little time as Nick Clegg | :08:51. | :08:53. | |
gave the Prime Minister on his U-turn on free schools. Aren't you | :08:54. | :08:57. | |
supposed to be partners? Green levies were under discussion in the | :08:58. | :09:05. | |
ministerial group before Wednesday, because we identified this as an | :09:06. | :09:09. | |
issue. We do that in a practical way. Sometimes there is only half an | :09:10. | :09:16. | |
hour's notice. We had even less than half an hour this morning! Simon | :09:17. | :09:22. | |
Hughes, thank you. So the price of energy is the big | :09:23. | :09:27. | |
battle ground in politics at the moment. 72% of people say that high | :09:28. | :09:31. | |
bills will influence the way they vote at the next election. Ed | :09:32. | :09:36. | |
Miliband has promised a price freeze after the next election, but will | :09:37. | :09:41. | |
the coalition turned the tables on Labour, with its proposal to roll | :09:42. | :09:47. | |
back green levies. Caroline Flint joins us from Sheffield. It looks | :09:48. | :09:55. | |
like the coalition will be able to take ?50 of energy bills, by | :09:56. | :10:03. | |
removing green levies. It is quite clear that different parts of the | :10:04. | :10:06. | |
government are running round waking up to the fact that the public feel | :10:07. | :10:10. | |
that this government has not done enough to listen to their concerns. | :10:11. | :10:14. | |
Last week, there was a classic case of the Prime Minister making up | :10:15. | :10:18. | |
policy literally at the dispatch box. Let's see what they say in the | :10:19. | :10:23. | |
autumn statement. The truth is, whatever the debate around green | :10:24. | :10:26. | |
levies, and I have always said we should look at value for money at | :10:27. | :10:31. | |
those green levies. Our argument is about acknowledging there is | :10:32. | :10:48. | |
something wrong with the way the market works, and the way those | :10:49. | :10:50. | |
companies are regulated. Behind our freeze for 20 months is a package of | :10:51. | :10:53. | |
proposals to reform this market. I understand that, but you cannot tell | :10:54. | :10:56. | |
as the details about that. I can. You cannot give us the details about | :10:57. | :10:58. | |
reforming the market. We are going to do three things, and I think I | :10:59. | :11:02. | |
said this last time I was on the programme. First, we are going to | :11:03. | :11:05. | |
separate out the generation side from the supply side within the big | :11:06. | :11:13. | |
six. Secondly, we will have a energy pool, or power exchange, where all | :11:14. | :11:17. | |
energy will have to be traded in that pool. Thirdly, we will | :11:18. | :11:22. | |
establish a tougher regulator, because Ofgem is increasingly being | :11:23. | :11:26. | |
seen as not doing the job right. I notice that you didn't mention any | :11:27. | :11:31. | |
reform of the current green and social taxes on the energy bill. Is | :11:32. | :11:36. | |
it Labour's policy to maintain the existing green levies? In 2011, the | :11:37. | :11:42. | |
government chose to get rid of warm front, which was the publicly funded | :11:43. | :11:48. | |
through tracks a scheme to support new installation. When they got rid | :11:49. | :11:52. | |
of that, it was the first time we had a government since the 70s that | :11:53. | :11:57. | |
didn't have such a policy. What is your policy? We voted against that | :11:58. | :12:03. | |
because we believe it is wrong. We believe that the eco-scheme, a | :12:04. | :12:09. | |
government intervention which is ?47 of the ?112 on our bills each year, | :12:10. | :12:16. | |
is expensive, bureaucratic and isn't going to the fuel poor. I am up for | :12:17. | :12:21. | |
a debate on these issues. I am up for a discussion on what the | :12:22. | :12:24. | |
government should do and what these energy companies should do. We | :12:25. | :12:28. | |
cannot let Cameron all the energy companies off the hook from the way | :12:29. | :12:31. | |
in which they organise their businesses, and expect us to pay | :12:32. | :12:37. | |
ever increasing rises in our bills. There is ?112 of green levies on our | :12:38. | :12:42. | |
bills at the moment. Did you vote against any of them? We didn't, but | :12:43. | :12:47. | |
what I would say ease these were government imposed levies. When they | :12:48. | :12:54. | |
got rid of the government funded programme, Warm Front, they | :12:55. | :13:02. | |
introduced the eco-scheme. The eco-project is one of the ones where | :13:03. | :13:08. | |
the energy companies are saying, it's too bureaucratic, and it is | :13:09. | :13:13. | |
proving more expensive than government estimates, apparently | :13:14. | :13:14. | |
doubled the amount the government thought. These things are all worth | :13:15. | :13:19. | |
looking at, but don't go to the heart of the issue. According to | :13:20. | :13:25. | |
official figures, on current plans, which you support, which you voted | :13:26. | :13:36. | |
for, households will be paying 41% more per unit of electricity by | :13:37. | :13:42. | |
2030. It puts your temporary freeze as just a blip. You support a 41% | :13:43. | :13:51. | |
rise in our bills. I support making sure we secure for the future access | :13:52. | :13:56. | |
to energy that we can grow here in the UK, whether it is through | :13:57. | :14:00. | |
nuclear, wind or solar, or other technologies yet to be developed. We | :14:01. | :14:08. | |
should protect ourselves against energy costs we cannot control. The | :14:09. | :14:13. | |
truth is, it is every fair for you to put that point across, and I | :14:14. | :14:17. | |
accept that, but we need to hear the other side about the cost for bill | :14:18. | :14:22. | |
payers if we didn't invest in new, indigenous sources of energy supply | :14:23. | :14:26. | |
for the future, which, in the long run, will be cheaper and more | :14:27. | :14:30. | |
secure, and create the jobs we need. I think it is important to | :14:31. | :14:34. | |
have a debate about these issues, but they have to be seen in the | :14:35. | :14:39. | |
right context. If we stay stuck in the past, we will pay more and we | :14:40. | :14:46. | |
will not create jobs. How can you criticise the coalition's plans for | :14:47. | :14:50. | |
a new nuclear station, when jeering 13 years of a Labour government, you | :14:51. | :14:55. | |
did not invest in a single nuclear plant? You sold off all our nuclear | :14:56. | :14:58. | |
technology to foreign companies. Energy provision was put out to | :14:59. | :15:12. | |
private hands and there has been no obstacle in British law against | :15:13. | :15:22. | |
ownership outside the UK. Part of this is looking ahead. Because your | :15:23. | :15:28. | |
previous track record is so bad? What we did decide under the | :15:29. | :15:33. | |
previous government, we came to the view, and there were discussions in | :15:34. | :15:38. | |
our party about this, that we did need to support a nuclear future. | :15:39. | :15:45. | |
At the time of that, David Cameron was one of those saying that | :15:46. | :15:47. | |
nuclear power should be a last resort. And as you said, the | :15:48. | :15:52. | |
Liberals did not support it. We stood up for that. We set in train | :15:53. | :15:59. | |
the green light of 10 sites, including Hinkley Point, for | :16:00. | :16:02. | |
nuclear development. I am glad to see that is making progress and we | :16:03. | :16:06. | |
should make more progress over the years ahead. We took a tough | :16:07. | :16:10. | |
decision when other governments had not done. You did not build a new | :16:11. | :16:19. | |
nuclear station. When you get back into power, will you build HS2? | :16:20. | :16:26. | |
That has not had a blank cheque from the Labour Party. I am in | :16:27. | :16:33. | |
favour of good infrastructure. Are you in favour of?, answer the | :16:34. | :16:39. | |
question? I have answered the question. It does not have a blank | :16:40. | :16:44. | |
cheque. If the prices are too high, we will review the decision when we | :16:45. | :16:48. | |
come back to vote on it. We will be looking at it closely. We have to | :16:49. | :16:53. | |
look for value for money and how it benefits the country. Have you | :16:54. | :16:59. | |
stocked up on jumpers this winter? I am perfectly all right with my | :17:00. | :17:02. | |
clothing. What is important, it is ridiculous for the Government to | :17:03. | :17:10. | |
suggest that the answer to the loss of trust in the energy companies is | :17:11. | :17:20. | |
to put on another jumper. The coalition has taken a long time | :17:21. | :17:25. | |
to come up with anything that can trump Ed Miliband's simple freezing | :17:26. | :17:30. | |
energy prices, vote for us. Are they on the brink of doing so? I do | :17:31. | :17:36. | |
not think so. They have had a problem that has dominated the | :17:37. | :17:40. | |
debate, talking about GDP, the figures came out on Friday and said, | :17:41. | :17:46. | |
well, and went back to talking about energy. My problem with what | :17:47. | :17:50. | |
David Cameron proposes is he agrees with the analysis that the Big Six | :17:51. | :17:56. | |
make too many profits. He wants to move the green levies into general | :17:57. | :18:01. | |
taxation, so that he looks like he is protecting the profits of the | :18:02. | :18:07. | |
energy companies. If the coalition can say they will take money off | :18:08. | :18:11. | |
the bills, does that change the game? I do not think the Liberal | :18:12. | :18:17. | |
Democrats are an obstacle to unwinding the green levies. I think | :18:18. | :18:23. | |
Nick Clegg is open to doing a deal, but the real obstacle is the carbon | :18:24. | :18:28. | |
reduction targets that we signed up to during the boom years. They were | :18:29. | :18:33. | |
ambitious I thought at the time. From that we have the taxes and | :18:34. | :18:37. | |
clocking up of the supply-side of the economy. Unless he will revise | :18:38. | :18:42. | |
that, and build from first principles a new strategy, he | :18:43. | :18:47. | |
cannot do more than put a dent into green levies. He might say as I | :18:48. | :18:53. | |
have got to ?50 now and if you voters in in an overall majority, I | :18:54. | :18:57. | |
will look up what we have done in the better times and give you more. | :18:58. | :19:02. | |
I am sure he will do that. It might be ?50 of the Bill, but it will be | :19:03. | :19:07. | |
?50 on your general taxation bill, which would be more progressive. | :19:08. | :19:13. | |
They will find it. We will never see it in general taxation. The | :19:14. | :19:19. | |
problem for the Coalition on what Ed Miliband has done is that it is | :19:20. | :19:25. | |
five weeks since he made that speech and it is all we are talking | :19:26. | :19:29. | |
about. David Cameron spent those five weeks trying to work out | :19:30. | :19:32. | |
whether Ed Miliband is a Marxist or whether he is connected to Middle | :19:33. | :19:36. | |
Britain. That is why Ed Miliband set the agenda. The coalition are | :19:37. | :19:41. | |
squabbling among themselves, looking petulant, on energy, and on | :19:42. | :19:48. | |
schools. Nobody is taking notice of the fact the economy is under way, | :19:49. | :19:54. | |
the recovery is under way. Ed Miliband has made the weather on | :19:55. | :20:01. | |
this. It UK has a relaxed attitude about | :20:02. | :20:07. | |
selling off assets based -- to companies based abroad. But this | :20:08. | :20:14. | |
week we have seen the Swiss owner of one of Scotland's largest | :20:15. | :20:16. | |
industrial sites, Grangemouth, come within a whisker of closing part of | :20:17. | :20:20. | |
it down. So should we care whether British assets have foreign owners? | :20:21. | :20:23. | |
Britain might be a nation of homeowners, but we appear to have | :20:24. | :20:26. | |
lost our taste for owning some of our biggest businesses. These are | :20:27. | :20:30. | |
among the crown jewels sold off in the past three decades to companies | :20:31. | :20:38. | |
based abroad. Roughly half of Britain's essential services have | :20:39. | :20:40. | |
overseas owners. The airport owner, British Airports Authority, is | :20:41. | :20:43. | |
owned by a Spanish company. Britain's largest water company, | :20:44. | :20:45. | |
Thames, is owned by a consortium led by an Australian bank. Four out | :20:46. | :20:49. | |
of six of Britain's biggest energy companies are owned by overseas | :20:50. | :20:52. | |
giants, and one of these, EDF Energy, which is owned by the | :20:53. | :20:54. | |
French state, is building Britain's first nuclear power plant in a | :20:55. | :20:57. | |
generation, backed by Chinese investors. It's a similar story for | :20:58. | :21:05. | |
train operator Arriva, bought by a company owned by the German state. | :21:06. | :21:10. | |
So part of the railways privatised by the British government was | :21:11. | :21:12. | |
effectively re-nationalised by the German government. But does it | :21:13. | :21:21. | |
matter who owns these companies, as long as the lights stay on, the | :21:22. | :21:25. | |
trains run on time, and we can still eat Cadbury's Dairy Milk? | :21:26. | :21:31. | |
We are joined by the general secretary of the RMT, Bob Crow, and | :21:32. | :21:36. | |
by venture capitalist Julie Meyer. They go head to head. | :21:37. | :21:44. | |
Have we seen the consequences of relying for essential services to | :21:45. | :21:50. | |
be foreign-owned? Four of the Big Six energy companies, Grangemouth, | :21:51. | :21:56. | |
owned by a tax exile in Switzerland. It is not good. I do not think | :21:57. | :22:02. | |
there is a cause and effect relationship between foreign | :22:03. | :22:07. | |
ownership and consumer prices. That is not the right comparison. We | :22:08. | :22:11. | |
need to be concerned about businesses represented the future, | :22:12. | :22:15. | |
businesses we are good at innovating for example in financial | :22:16. | :22:19. | |
services and the UK has a history of building businesses, such as | :22:20. | :22:27. | |
Monotypes. If we were not creating businesses here -- Monotise. Like | :22:28. | :22:37. | |
so many businesses creating products and services and creating | :22:38. | :22:46. | |
the shareholders. Should we allow hour essential services to be in | :22:47. | :22:52. | |
foreign ownership? It was demonstrated this week at | :22:53. | :22:56. | |
Grangemouth. If you do not own the industry, you do not own it. The | :22:57. | :23:01. | |
MPs of this country and the politicians in Scotland have no say, | :23:02. | :23:05. | |
they were consultants. Multinationals decide whether to | :23:06. | :23:11. | |
shut a company down. If that had been Unite union, they are the ones | :23:12. | :23:16. | |
who saved the jobs. They capitulated. They will come back, | :23:17. | :23:22. | |
like they have for the past 150 years, and capture again what they | :23:23. | :23:26. | |
lost. If it had closed, they would have lost their jobs for ever. If | :23:27. | :23:33. | |
the union had called the members up without a ballot for strike action, | :23:34. | :23:37. | |
there would have been uproar. This person in Switzerland can decide to | :23:38. | :23:42. | |
shut the entire industry down. The coalition, the Labour Party, as | :23:43. | :23:47. | |
well, when Labour was in government, they played a role of allowing | :23:48. | :23:52. | |
industries to go abroad, and it should be returned to public | :23:53. | :24:04. | |
ownership. Nestor. It has demonstrated that the Net comes | :24:05. | :24:12. | |
from new businesses. We must not be... When Daly motion was stopped | :24:13. | :24:18. | |
by the French government to be sold, it was an arrow to the heart of | :24:19. | :24:23. | |
French entrepreneurs. We must not create that culture in the UK. | :24:24. | :24:28. | |
Every train running in France is built in France. 90% of the trains | :24:29. | :24:32. | |
running in Germany are built in Germany. In Japan, it has to be | :24:33. | :24:42. | |
built in that country, and now an energy company in France is | :24:43. | :24:46. | |
reducing its nuclear capability in its own country and wants to make | :24:47. | :24:50. | |
profits out of the British industry to put back into it state industry. | :24:51. | :24:55. | |
That happened with the railway industry. They want to make money | :24:56. | :24:58. | |
at the expense of their own state companies. We sold off energy | :24:59. | :25:09. | |
production. How did we end up in a position where our nuclear capacity | :25:10. | :25:14. | |
will be built by a company owned by a socialist date, France, and | :25:15. | :25:17. | |
funded by a communist one, China, for vital infrastructure? I am not | :25:18. | :25:26. | |
suggesting that is in the national interest. I am saying we can pick | :25:27. | :25:31. | |
any one example and say it is a shame. The simple matter of the | :25:32. | :25:35. | |
fact is the owners are having to make decisions. Not just | :25:36. | :25:39. | |
Grangemouth, businesses are making decisions about what is the common | :25:40. | :25:44. | |
good. Not just in the shareholders' interest. For employees, customers. | :25:45. | :25:50. | |
What is in the common good when prices go up by 10% and the reason | :25:51. | :25:56. | |
is that 20 years ago they shut every coal pit down in this country, | :25:57. | :26:00. | |
the Germans kept theirs open and subsidised it and now we have the | :26:01. | :26:03. | |
Germans doing away with nuclear power and they have coal. Under the | :26:04. | :26:12. | |
Labour government, in 2008, the climate change Act was passed. Well | :26:13. | :26:17. | |
before that, and you know yourself, they shut down the coal mines to | :26:18. | :26:22. | |
smash the National Union of Mineworkers because they dared to | :26:23. | :26:26. | |
stand up for people in their community. Even if we wanted to | :26:27. | :26:30. | |
reopen the coalmines, it would be pointless. Under the 2008 Act, we | :26:31. | :26:36. | |
are not meant to burn more coal. The can, as if you spent some of | :26:37. | :26:42. | |
the profits, you could have carbon catch up. That does not exist on a | :26:43. | :26:50. | |
massive scale. You are arguing the case, Julie Meyer, for | :26:51. | :26:54. | |
entrepreneurs to come to this country. Even Bob Crow is not | :26:55. | :27:00. | |
against that. We are trying to argue, should essential services be | :27:01. | :27:07. | |
in foreign hands? Not those in Silicon round about doing start-ups. | :27:08. | :27:13. | |
I am trying to draw a broader principle than just energy. | :27:14. | :27:18. | |
Something like broadband services, also important to the functioning | :27:19. | :27:24. | |
of the economy. I believe in the UK's ability to innovate. When we | :27:25. | :27:30. | |
have businesses that play off broadband companies to get the best | :27:31. | :27:35. | |
prices for consumers. These new businesses and business models are | :27:36. | :27:41. | |
the best way. Not to control, but to influence. It will be a disaster. | :27:42. | :27:46. | |
Prices will go up and up as a result. Nissan in Sunderland, a | :27:47. | :27:53. | |
Japanese factory, some of the best cars and productivity. You want | :27:54. | :27:56. | |
that to be nationalised and bring it down to the standard of British | :27:57. | :28:01. | |
Leyland? It is not bring it down to the standard. The car manufacturing | :28:02. | :28:05. | |
base in this country has been wrecked. We make more cars now for | :28:06. | :28:12. | |
20 years -- than in 20 years. Ford's Dagenham produced some of | :28:13. | :28:17. | |
the best cars in the world. Did you buy one? I cannot drive. They moved | :28:18. | :28:24. | |
their plants to other countries, where it was cheaper labour. Would | :28:25. | :28:31. | |
you nationalise Nissan? There should be one car industry that | :28:32. | :28:36. | |
produces cars for people. This week the EU summit was about Angela | :28:37. | :28:41. | |
Merkel's mobile phone being tapped, they call it a handy. We sent Adam | :28:42. | :28:49. | |
to Brussels and told him to ignore the business about phone-tapping | :28:50. | :28:52. | |
and investigate the Prime Minister's policy on Europe instead. | :28:53. | :29:02. | |
I have come to my first EU summit to see how David Cameron is getting on | :29:03. | :29:11. | |
with his strategy to claim power was back from Brussels. Got any powers | :29:12. | :29:21. | |
back yet? Yes! Which ones? Sadly, his fellow leaders were not as | :29:22. | :29:25. | |
forthcoming. Chancellor, are you going to give any powers back to | :29:26. | :29:32. | |
Britain? Has David Cameron asked you for any powers back? The president | :29:33. | :29:35. | |
of the commission just laughed, and listen to the Lithuanian President. | :29:36. | :29:44. | |
How is David Cameron's renegotiation strategy going? What's that? He | :29:45. | :29:54. | |
wants powers back for Britain. No one knows what powers David Cameron | :29:55. | :29:59. | |
actually wants. Even our usual allies, like Sweden, are bit | :30:00. | :30:06. | |
baffled. We actually don't know yet what is going through the UK | :30:07. | :30:12. | |
membership. We will await the finalisation of that first. You | :30:13. | :30:18. | |
should ask him, and then tell us! Here is someone who must know, the | :30:19. | :30:23. | |
Dutch Prime Minister, he is doing what we are doing, carrying out a | :30:24. | :30:29. | |
review of the EU powers, known as competencies in the jargon, before | :30:30. | :30:34. | |
negotiating to get some back. Have you had any negotiations with David | :30:35. | :30:37. | |
Cameron over what powers you can bring back from Brussels? That is | :30:38. | :30:45. | |
not on the agenda of this summit. Have you talked to him about it? | :30:46. | :30:49. | |
This is not on the schedule for this summit. | :30:50. | :30:55. | |
David Cameron's advises tummy it is because he is playing the long game. | :30:56. | :31:06. | |
-- David Cameron's advisers tell me. At this summit, there was a task | :31:07. | :31:11. | |
force discussing how to cut EU red tape. Just how long this game is was | :31:12. | :31:18. | |
explained to me outside the summit, by the leader of the Conservatives | :31:19. | :31:24. | |
in the European Parliament. I think the behind-the-scenes negotiations | :31:25. | :31:28. | |
will start happening when the new commissioner is appointed later next | :31:29. | :31:32. | |
year. I think the detailed negotiations will start to happen | :31:33. | :31:36. | |
bubbly after the UK general election. That is when we will start | :31:37. | :31:41. | |
getting all of the detail of the horse trading, and real, Lake night | :31:42. | :31:49. | |
negotiations. Angela Merkel seems keen to rewrite the EU's main | :31:50. | :31:53. | |
treaties to deal with changes in the Eurozone, and that is the mechanism | :31:54. | :31:58. | |
David Cameron would use to renegotiate our membership. Everyone | :31:59. | :32:02. | |
here says his relationship with the German Chancellor is strong. So | :32:03. | :32:06. | |
after days in this building, here is how it looks. David Cameron has a | :32:07. | :32:13. | |
mountain to climb. It is climbable, but he isn't even in the foothills | :32:14. | :32:17. | |
yet. Has he even started packing his bags for the trip? | :32:18. | :32:21. | |
Joining us now, a man who knows a thing or two about the difficulties | :32:22. | :32:29. | |
Prime Minister 's face in Europe. Former Deputy Prime Minister, | :32:30. | :32:32. | |
Michael Heseltine. We are nine months from David Cameron's defining | :32:33. | :32:37. | |
speech on EU renegotiation. Can you think of one area of progress? I | :32:38. | :32:44. | |
don't know. And you don't know. And that's a good thing. Why is it a | :32:45. | :32:52. | |
good thing? Because the real progress goes on behind closed | :32:53. | :33:03. | |
doors. And only the most naive, because the real progress goes on | :33:04. | :33:09. | |
behind closed doors. Because, in this weary world, you and I, Andrew, | :33:10. | :33:14. | |
know full well that the moment you say, I making progress, people say, | :33:15. | :33:21. | |
where? And the machine goes to work to show that the progress isn't | :33:22. | :33:27. | |
enough. So you are much better off making progress as best you can in | :33:28. | :33:35. | |
the privacy of private diplomacy. It is a long journey ahead. In this | :33:36. | :33:40. | |
long journey, do you have a clear sense of the destination? Do you | :33:41. | :33:46. | |
have a clear sense of what powers Mr Cameron wants to negotiate? I have a | :33:47. | :33:51. | |
clear sense of the destination, which is a victory for the campaign | :33:52. | :33:56. | |
that he will win to stay inside the European community. That is the | :33:57. | :34:03. | |
agenda, and I have total support for that. I understand that, but if he | :34:04. | :34:11. | |
is incapable of getting any tangible sign of renegotiation, if he is able | :34:12. | :34:16. | |
only to do what Wilson did in 1975, which was to get a couple of token | :34:17. | :34:23. | |
changes to our membership status, he goes into that referendum without | :34:24. | :34:28. | |
much to argue for. He has everything to argue for. He's got Britain's | :34:29. | :34:36. | |
vital role as a major contributor to the community. He's got Britain's | :34:37. | :34:39. | |
self interest as a major beneficiary, and Britain's vital | :34:40. | :34:48. | |
role in the City of London. He's got everything to argue for. He could | :34:49. | :34:52. | |
argue for that now. He could have a referendum now. He doesn't want one | :34:53. | :34:58. | |
now. I haven't any doubt that he will come back with something to | :34:59. | :35:07. | |
talk about. But it may be slightly different to what his critics, the | :35:08. | :35:15. | |
UK isolationist party people, want. He may, for example, have found that | :35:16. | :35:19. | |
allies within the community want change as well, and he may secure | :35:20. | :35:25. | |
changes in the way the community works, which would be a significant | :35:26. | :35:31. | |
argument within the referendum campaign. Let me give you an | :35:32. | :35:37. | |
example. I think it is a scandal that the European Commission don't | :35:38. | :35:42. | |
secure the auditing of some of the accounts. Perhaps that could be on | :35:43. | :35:45. | |
the agenda. He might find a lot of accounts. Perhaps that could be on | :35:46. | :35:50. | |
contributing countries, like Germany, like Colin and, would be | :35:51. | :35:59. | |
very keen. -- like Holland. David vetoed the increase in the European | :36:00. | :36:03. | |
budgets the other day, and he had a lot of allies. So working within | :36:04. | :36:09. | |
Europe on the things that people paying the European bills want is | :36:10. | :36:15. | |
fertile ground. Is John Major right to call for a windfall tax on the | :36:16. | :36:21. | |
energy companies? John is a very cautious fellow. He doesn't say | :36:22. | :36:25. | |
things without thinking them out. So I was surprised that he went for a | :36:26. | :36:33. | |
windfall tax. First of all, it is retrospective, and secondly, it is | :36:34. | :36:37. | |
difficult to predict what the consequences will be. I am, myself, | :36:38. | :36:42. | |
more interested in the other part of his speech, which was talking about | :36:43. | :36:46. | |
the need for the Conservative Party to seek a wider horizon, to | :36:47. | :36:51. | |
recognise what is happening to the Conservative Party in the way in | :36:52. | :36:56. | |
which its membership is shrinking into a southeastern enclave. Are you | :36:57. | :37:05. | |
in favour of a windfall tax? I am not in favour of increasing any | :37:06. | :37:17. | |
taxes. Do you share Iain Duncan Smith's point of view on welfare | :37:18. | :37:23. | |
reform? I think Iain Duncan Smith is right. It is extremely difficult to | :37:24. | :37:32. | |
do, but he is right to try. I think public opinion is behind him, but it | :37:33. | :37:41. | |
isn't easy, because on the fringe of these issues there are genuine hard | :37:42. | :37:46. | |
luck stories, and they are the ones that become the focus of attention | :37:47. | :37:51. | |
the moment you introduce change. It requires a lot of political skill to | :37:52. | :37:57. | |
negotiate your way through that. But isn't Iain Duncan Smith right to | :37:58. | :38:02. | |
invoke the beverage principle, that you should be expected to make a | :38:03. | :38:06. | |
contribution for the welfare you depend on? Yes, he is. I will let | :38:07. | :38:12. | |
you get your Sunday lunch. Thanks for joining us. | :38:13. | :38:16. | |
Coming up in just over 20 minutes, I will be looking | :38:17. | :38:19. | |
Hello and welcome to Sunday Politics in Northern Ireland. He has warned | :38:20. | :38:35. | |
the Tories they are being complacent with their policy here. They say he | :38:36. | :38:39. | |
is parroting the rubbish of his predecessor. The news shadow | :38:40. | :38:44. | |
Secretary of State, Ivan Lewis, joins me live from Manchester. -- | :38:45. | :38:51. | |
the new. Also, is the Exploris Aquarium about to sink or can | :38:52. | :38:55. | |
politicians when the will and the money to save it? To make sense of | :38:56. | :39:00. | |
all that, I am joined by the Irish News journalist Allison Morris and | :39:01. | :39:05. | |
Professor Pete Shirlow from Queen's University. | :39:06. | :39:09. | |
Labour has a new man looking after the Northern Ireland portfolio, and | :39:10. | :39:12. | |
ruffle a few feathers. He has ruffle a few feathers. He has | :39:13. | :39:18. | |
already accused the government of being complacent about what is going | :39:19. | :39:22. | |
on here. But even though he may have annoyed the Secretary of State with | :39:23. | :39:26. | |
the comment, he insists he is wedded to a bipartisan approach to the | :39:27. | :39:30. | |
peace process. Mr Lewis joins me now from Salford studio. In no time you | :39:31. | :39:37. | |
were criticising the government for being complacent. Not at all. The | :39:38. | :39:42. | |
basis on which I made these comments are made on the conversations I have | :39:43. | :39:47. | |
made with senior politicians in Northern Ireland. There is a general | :39:48. | :39:53. | |
view that the UK government is disengaged, is semidetached and | :39:54. | :39:56. | |
politicians in Northern Ireland want them to take on a far more hands-on | :39:57. | :40:01. | |
role. I have made it clear when it comes to supporting issues, we will | :40:02. | :40:10. | |
share our bipartisan report should. -- approach. Where is the evidence | :40:11. | :40:18. | |
for that? You are only in the job, you cannot have done a meaningful | :40:19. | :40:24. | |
sampling of opinion? Many agree that my predecessor was highly respected | :40:25. | :40:29. | |
and was in touch with what was going on. It was his view that he did his | :40:30. | :40:37. | |
job for two years. In all the conversations I have had over the | :40:38. | :40:40. | |
last two weeks, they have made the same point. When I made this point | :40:41. | :40:46. | |
in a debate on Wednesday I got a lot of support with Westminster -based | :40:47. | :40:54. | |
Northern Ireland politicians. Theresa Villiers not particularly | :40:55. | :41:01. | |
pleased with you. She says, with virtually no knowledge, you were | :41:02. | :41:03. | |
parroting the rubbish of your predecessor. It is not a very | :41:04. | :41:12. | |
harmonious start? On the vast majority of issues we will seek a | :41:13. | :41:18. | |
bipartisan approach, I have made that very, very clear. Where there | :41:19. | :41:24. | |
is a general view which affects the situation in Northern Ireland, the | :41:25. | :41:33. | |
engagement of the UK government, the UK's Secretary of State is very | :41:34. | :41:45. | |
important. You talk about the Haas talks, surely they should be part of | :41:46. | :41:49. | |
the bipartisan than approach? Exactly. Haas is supporting, has a | :41:50. | :41:59. | |
lot of credibility in terms of the disturbances we have seen a Northern | :42:00. | :42:04. | |
Ireland this year, his work is important. In terms of the outcome | :42:05. | :42:11. | |
of the macro to process, -- Haas process, the role of the UK | :42:12. | :42:17. | |
government and the Republic of government and the Republic of | :42:18. | :42:19. | |
Ireland government is going to be incredibly important. I welcome that | :42:20. | :42:24. | |
Haas met with the Prime Minister last week, that ongoing engagement | :42:25. | :42:30. | |
is incredibly important. How many times have you been here? I have | :42:31. | :42:35. | |
been privileged to visit last weekend. I attended the annual | :42:36. | :42:47. | |
awards of the retail sector. I addressed the Ulster Unionist Party | :42:48. | :42:50. | |
at their annual conference. I have visited once previously when Peter | :42:51. | :42:54. | |
Mandelson was the Secretary of State on a fact-finding mission. I am not | :42:55. | :43:02. | |
an expert in Northern Ireland. I am going to listen and learn and then | :43:03. | :43:07. | |
on the issues were the opposition can make a difference, provide some | :43:08. | :43:12. | |
leadership. That is what people will expect. People will expect you to be | :43:13. | :43:17. | |
an expert and get up to speed quickly. Does it feel to you at this | :43:18. | :43:26. | |
stage like a place apart? I will tell you how it feels, the people I | :43:27. | :43:33. | |
speak to, what stands out for me is the frankness and blindness of the | :43:34. | :43:39. | |
people I speak to. Whether it be representatives of the business | :43:40. | :43:48. | |
community or civil communities. Alongside that there is massive | :43:49. | :43:52. | |
goodwill to support me in my role and my party. We are incredibly | :43:53. | :44:00. | |
proud of the part the Labour Party played in delivering the peace party | :44:01. | :44:03. | |
process along with the people in part is of Northern Ireland. -- | :44:04. | :44:11. | |
parties. We have an ongoing responsibility and we feel that very | :44:12. | :44:15. | |
passionately. For the benefit of people watching is that on that do | :44:16. | :44:20. | |
not know much about you and are interested in what you have to say, | :44:21. | :44:21. | |
not know much about you and are what is the key difference in what | :44:22. | :44:26. | |
your approach would be if you work Secretary of State? I would spend a | :44:27. | :44:35. | |
lot more time getting to know ordinary people as well as | :44:36. | :44:39. | |
politicians, community groups, grassroots organisations, spending | :44:40. | :44:45. | |
time in constituencies. I would have a more proactive approach in terms | :44:46. | :44:50. | |
of supporting the Northern Ireland executive and assembly on jobs and | :44:51. | :44:55. | |
growth. I welcome the conference that took place last week, but | :44:56. | :45:01. | |
getting involved in bringing that inward investment into the country | :45:02. | :45:07. | |
is crucial. We would not pursue some of the welfare reform policies which | :45:08. | :45:13. | |
are pernicious, the bedroom tax, and which would cost if I -- a | :45:14. | :45:22. | |
significant amount of money. We are about jobs and growth, about welfare | :45:23. | :45:29. | |
and reform and general engagement. Thank you very much for joining us | :45:30. | :45:33. | |
on the programme this morning. I am joined by Allison Morris and | :45:34. | :45:39. | |
Professor Pete Shirlow. It is interesting to get the news shadow | :45:40. | :45:46. | |
Secretary of State to list out his approach. There was not sense of -- | :45:47. | :46:01. | |
a sense of that. Theresa Villiers has been very important in terms of | :46:02. | :46:04. | |
the fact that she has stopped enquiries, there are things the | :46:05. | :46:11. | |
Secretary of State can do but the rule is very limited. There is | :46:12. | :46:15. | |
nothing there to suggest that there would be a departure from that role. | :46:16. | :46:20. | |
Any differences that strike you? The rule has been watered down. He has | :46:21. | :46:28. | |
come out with some controversial statement early on to try and make a | :46:29. | :46:32. | |
mark in to try and show there was some kind of difference. Theresa | :46:33. | :46:40. | |
accused of things over the summer. accused of things over the summer. | :46:41. | :46:46. | |
The current Secretary of State is a cool character, she would not be the | :46:47. | :46:49. | |
type of person who would get her hands dirty and get to know people. | :46:50. | :46:55. | |
He did not he has only ever been here twice. An MP for Vauxhall from | :46:56. | :47:05. | |
Northern Ireland, issued a direct use of advice for home which was, | :47:06. | :47:12. | |
meet communities, get down on the ground. If he does that, that would | :47:13. | :47:18. | |
be very interesting. Does it seem to you that is what he needs to do and | :47:19. | :47:23. | |
that is what the current Secretary of State is not doing? It does bring | :47:24. | :47:31. | |
faith into political institutions and makes people think that | :47:32. | :47:35. | |
politicians care. Although the role is limited, it is still an important | :47:36. | :47:39. | |
role. Any engagement would be crucial. We don't have an opposition | :47:40. | :47:46. | |
here in Northern Ireland, do we need a shadow Secretary of State to be an | :47:47. | :47:54. | |
effective voice of opposition? The secretary of state does not have any | :47:55. | :47:59. | |
political powers. He could make statements because we do not have an | :48:00. | :48:03. | |
opposition here, are local politicians might be scared. It is | :48:04. | :48:09. | |
interesting, I think he will be an interesting character to watch. He | :48:10. | :48:16. | |
did I am self to a lot of local politicians here. But as Peter said, | :48:17. | :48:24. | |
it is not a role with any effect. It was interesting to hear what he had | :48:25. | :48:29. | |
to say. We will see if we comes back to Northern Ireland for his third | :48:30. | :48:34. | |
visit. The Enterprise Trade and Investment | :48:35. | :48:36. | |
Committee made a fact-finding visit to the ex-Lotus aquarium in | :48:37. | :48:41. | |
Portaferry this week. Nothing odd about that, you might think, but | :48:42. | :48:47. | |
some have queried why Ards Borough Council didn't ask the Department | :48:48. | :48:51. | |
itself, which has responsibility for tourism, of course - for help in | :48:52. | :48:56. | |
saving the aquarium. Sinn Fein claims the decision not to contact | :48:57. | :49:02. | |
DETI was politically motivated. So what are the issues threatening the | :49:03. | :49:06. | |
aquarium's survival? He was mark since. The politicians came to see | :49:07. | :49:08. | |
aquarium's survival? He was mark the fish and also to hear the | :49:09. | :49:13. | |
arguments in favour of keeping open the aquarium. Campaigners say that | :49:14. | :49:18. | |
Northern Ireland couldn't afford to lose a vital visitor attraction. | :49:19. | :49:23. | |
They are coming here because it is special, it is different. They can | :49:24. | :49:27. | |
see a Sea life centre anywhere in the world, there is only one | :49:28. | :49:32. | |
Exploris. But the problem is the aquarium is costing the council more | :49:33. | :49:38. | |
than ?500,000 a year. It is not just in aquarium water seals actually | :49:39. | :49:44. | |
helping those injured to recover in safe surroundings. In the past the | :49:45. | :49:47. | |
council has taken turtles washed up on the shore to the Bahamas. I | :49:48. | :49:54. | |
wouldn't say that it has to be specifically somewhere, it may be | :49:55. | :49:58. | |
difficult for us to get them be honed but that is what we would have | :49:59. | :50:02. | |
to do. But is there a chance of a last-minute reprieve for Exploris? I | :50:03. | :50:09. | |
hope it will be saved. It is a great facility. For anyone to allow this | :50:10. | :50:16. | |
to go down the drain as madness. Exploris has no shortage of | :50:17. | :50:18. | |
supporters but what it really needs is more money and there is no sign | :50:19. | :50:21. | |
yet that it is going to get it. Mark Simpson reporting. To discuss | :50:22. | :50:39. | |
the uncertain for two -- future for Exploris is Philip Smith and Phil | :50:40. | :50:44. | |
Flanagan. Thanks for joining us. Why precisely did the council not | :50:45. | :50:52. | |
contact DETI for support? I am delighted to be able to ask DETI for | :50:53. | :50:56. | |
support. Every time I talk about this either they are on my list as | :50:57. | :51:01. | |
support for Exploris. It is not about going to a list of executive | :51:02. | :51:07. | |
departments but about the Executive taken a holistic view here. I do not | :51:08. | :51:14. | |
know -- care what department comes forward to support, I want the | :51:15. | :51:17. | |
Executive to take the lead here. It is important that the realise it is | :51:18. | :51:21. | |
not just a local facility but regional facility. Your council | :51:22. | :51:28. | |
contacted three departments asking for support. Not enterprise trade | :51:29. | :51:39. | |
and investment. The council did not contact that department and I am | :51:40. | :51:46. | |
asking you why not. And the motion was -- a motion was put for words to | :51:47. | :51:56. | |
do this. We have done that and as I said before, I do not care which | :51:57. | :52:01. | |
department comes forward, as long as they do collectively, up with a | :52:02. | :52:11. | |
solution. Do you have an explanation why your colleagues did not help? | :52:12. | :52:21. | |
Were they trying to protect the DUP tourism Minister? I believe that | :52:22. | :52:29. | |
DETI have a role to play here. Do you think it was a mistake not to | :52:30. | :52:33. | |
formally approached them? It has been done. Has it? The council has | :52:34. | :52:42. | |
asked for DETI's input. And from the Executive as a whole. That is the | :52:43. | :52:47. | |
bottom line. I am not concerned about what department it is, as long | :52:48. | :52:56. | |
as one comes forward with proposals. You have heard the explanation from | :52:57. | :53:05. | |
the deputy mayor. I think the view of people in Portaferry that I | :53:06. | :53:10. | |
engage with is that there is a feeling that it has been up for | :53:11. | :53:14. | |
closure and it has been run down for a number of years because of its | :53:15. | :53:19. | |
location in Portaferry. Why because of its location? Portaferry is in a | :53:20. | :53:27. | |
Unionist dominated council area and it is a small nationalist part of | :53:28. | :53:38. | |
the area. People have felt that many facilities have been run down in the | :53:39. | :53:42. | |
last few years. Exploris is the latest on the list. The concern of | :53:43. | :53:48. | |
the people is that is being targeted because of its location in | :53:49. | :53:52. | |
Portaferry. We have heard some say that it should be located in another | :53:53. | :53:58. | |
area. So it is sectarian, that is what you are saying? I cannot say | :53:59. | :54:04. | |
that. It is the view is the views that are being presented to me by | :54:05. | :54:09. | |
the people of Portaferry. Have you heard that suggestion and how do you | :54:10. | :54:13. | |
respond to it? I think the accusation of sectarianism is slower | :54:14. | :54:20. | |
on a council that has an excellent record on relations. -- slur. ?1.8 | :54:21. | :54:34. | |
million was spent in Portaferry. In my own area, we had less money | :54:35. | :54:47. | |
spent. They are of equal size. If that is sectarian... It is a small | :54:48. | :55:06. | |
area, the councillor approached three ministers who are all | :55:07. | :55:12. | |
nationalists. They didn't approach the DETI. We are putting two and two | :55:13. | :55:19. | |
together. I can always be for my own party. After the decision was made, | :55:20. | :55:28. | |
it was put to four ministers as well as DETI. We have done our bit, we | :55:29. | :55:32. | |
have an amendment to the last proposal coming to the assembly in a | :55:33. | :55:37. | |
week or two, technology this is a regional facility and asking the | :55:38. | :55:43. | |
Executive to step up to the plate. Let's talk about what the future | :55:44. | :55:47. | |
might be. You have been to visit it, you have now seen it and talk to | :55:48. | :55:52. | |
some of the people who work there and visit their and who want to see | :55:53. | :55:57. | |
it said. Do you see it as a regional facility that need support? The | :55:58. | :56:02. | |
Executive needs to explore it. One of the problems is that there has | :56:03. | :56:08. | |
not been a proper market strategy. I had never heard of the place before | :56:09. | :56:11. | |
it was proposed for closure in the media picked up on it. But certainly | :56:12. | :56:17. | |
the Executive collectively needs to work with the council and interested | :56:18. | :56:26. | |
stakeholders to work out how they can keep this excellent facility. | :56:27. | :56:37. | |
The council may need to dig deeper into its pockets? Absolutely. The | :56:38. | :56:53. | |
president has already been set here. -- precedent. We will leave it | :56:54. | :57:00. | |
there. Thank you for joining us on the programme. Let's take a look | :57:01. | :57:05. | |
back at the political week that was in 60 Seconds with Gareth Gordon. | :57:06. | :57:15. | |
Permission denied, the new planning Bill stopped at ground level. After | :57:16. | :57:20. | |
very careful and lengthy consideration, I have decided not to | :57:21. | :57:27. | |
move the bill onto further consideration stage now or later. | :57:28. | :57:34. | |
The shank ill bombing is remembered 20 years on. -- Shankill bombing. | :57:35. | :57:46. | |
The findings in this book came from... The Minister can talk like | :57:47. | :58:02. | |
she always does. Disgraceful from Mr Flanagan. It is the type of | :58:03. | :58:07. | |
opportunistic stuff I expect from him. A beauty pageant in Stormont. | :58:08. | :58:17. | |
Time for a final word from Allison him. A beauty pageant in Stormont. | :58:18. | :58:29. | |
Morris and Pete Shirlow. The past, systemic collusion in the 1970s. The | :58:30. | :58:40. | |
book is a remarkable piece of research. It is 15 years worth of | :58:41. | :58:45. | |
research. It brings together for the first time reports, RUC files from | :58:46. | :58:53. | |
the time and witness testimonies. It is the first time someone has joined | :58:54. | :58:57. | |
the dots. We have always thought there was some collusion in the | :58:58. | :58:58. | |
area. It has left a lot of families there was some collusion in the | :58:59. | :59:03. | |
with a lot of questions that need and sold. That is across the board, | :59:04. | :59:08. | |
we also saw the Shankill bombing commemoration. Yes, that is the | :59:09. | :59:15. | |
other point about remembering the past, were 20 years on from the | :59:16. | :59:20. | |
Shankill bombing and 20 years of the Greysteel massacre coming up later | :59:21. | :59:23. | |
this week. What did you make of that book? People went to prison, so we | :59:24. | :59:32. | |
know there was collusion. What I find difficult about the whole issue | :59:33. | :59:39. | |
is the way it is partisan and it is finger-pointing. We are now close to | :59:40. | :59:47. | |
be conciliation. It is now we see some of the families who've lost | :59:48. | :59:58. | |
members who are taking up cases. We have a process of prosecution, we | :59:59. | :00:02. | |
have a process of enquiry that is finished, but we still have, taking | :00:03. | :00:12. | |
place. This constant animosity which is not good for victims. We are a | :00:13. | :00:18. | |
long way to finding a solution. It is necessary to find a better way to | :00:19. | :00:23. | |
deal with this. We have the Haas walks -- talks we commencing this | :00:24. | :00:30. | |
week. What are your thoughts on the prospects of progress? He is here to | :00:31. | :00:43. | |
discuss how we deal with the past. We still do not have an agreed | :00:44. | :00:50. | |
definition of victims. We should concentrate on the living and those | :00:51. | :00:57. | |
left behind. Rather than constantly arguing of the definition of those | :00:58. | :01:07. | |
who died. It is down to leadership here. It is down to whether people | :01:08. | :01:18. | |
share their definitions and of the runway. | :01:19. | :01:20. | |
free school area for into that category. Thank you. | :01:21. | :01:32. | |
Is Labour about to drop its support category. Thank you. | :01:33. | :01:32. | |
Is Labour about to drop its support for High Speed 2, a rail line the | :01:33. | :01:37. | |
party approved while in government? for High Speed 2, a rail line the | :01:38. | :01:48. | |
these green shoots? These are all questions for The Week Ahead. | :01:49. | :02:00. | |
So, HS2. Miss Flint wouldn't answer the question. She's in northern MP | :02:01. | :02:04. | |
too. Ed Balls is comparing it to the Millennium Dome. | :02:05. | :02:10. | |
too. Ed Balls is comparing it to the minute's silence for HS2? It will | :02:11. | :02:14. | |
not be quite as crude as that. They will not stand up and say, we | :02:15. | :02:19. | |
not be quite as crude as that. They senior Labour person said to me it | :02:20. | :02:20. | |
would be a bit senior Labour person said to me it | :02:21. | :02:22. | |
that Gordon Brown and Ed Balls set for the euro back in 97. They will | :02:23. | :02:28. | |
be chucking lots of questions into the air, and the questions will | :02:29. | :02:32. | |
create doubt, and will create the grounds for Labour to say, at some | :02:33. | :02:39. | |
point, we think there is a much much better way of spending the money. It | :02:40. | :02:44. | |
isn't ?42 billion, because that includes a contingency. Let's see | :02:45. | :02:50. | |
what Peter Mandelson had to say about HS2. He was in the government | :02:51. | :02:58. | |
when Labour supported it. Frankly, there was too much of the argument | :02:59. | :03:02. | |
that if everyone else has got a high-speed train, we should have won | :03:03. | :03:09. | |
too. Regardless of need, regardless of cost, and regardless of | :03:10. | :03:14. | |
alternatives. As a party, to be frank, we didn't feel like being | :03:15. | :03:20. | |
trumped by the zeal of the then opposition's support for the | :03:21. | :03:26. | |
high-speed train. We wanted, if anything, to upstage them. So they | :03:27. | :03:31. | |
didn't really need it, and we're only talking about ?50 billion. Why | :03:32. | :03:38. | |
would you take a decision involving ?50 billion in a serious way? For | :03:39. | :03:43. | |
David Cameron, if it becomes clear Labour is against it, he cannot | :03:44. | :03:48. | |
proceed. He indicated last week that he wouldn't proceed if the certainty | :03:49. | :03:53. | |
wasn't there. For Labour, HS2 is really a debate about the deficit by | :03:54. | :03:57. | |
proxy. They think that if you don't go ahead with HS2, that releases | :03:58. | :04:02. | |
tens of billions of pounds to spend on other things, such as public | :04:03. | :04:06. | |
services, without going into boring. I don't think that works because | :04:07. | :04:29. | |
there was a difference between cancelling something that already | :04:30. | :04:31. | |
exists to pay for something else, and cancelling something that does | :04:32. | :04:33. | |
not yet exist and will be paid for over decades to pay for something | :04:34. | :04:36. | |
here and now. Can Labour do this? I know that the line will be, we are | :04:37. | :04:39. | |
not going to build this railway because we are going to build | :04:40. | :04:41. | |
200,000 houses a year. Can they do this without political cost? I think | :04:42. | :04:44. | |
there will be political costs, but they will play this card of we have | :04:45. | :04:48. | |
changed our mind. I think Cameron's line has been very clever, saying we | :04:49. | :04:54. | |
cannot do it without labour. You can put it in two ways. Sorry, we cannot | :04:55. | :04:59. | |
go ahead with it, but Labour has ruined your chance of prosperity, or | :05:00. | :05:03. | |
they can tie themselves to it, and then Labour cannot attack it on | :05:04. | :05:09. | |
great grounds when costs do spire. You can write Labour's script right | :05:10. | :05:13. | |
great grounds when costs do spire. now. They can say, if we were in | :05:14. | :05:20. | |
charge, the financial management would be much better. This raises | :05:21. | :05:24. | |
some really important questions for the government. They have utterly | :05:25. | :05:30. | |
failed to make the case for HS2. There is a real case to make. | :05:31. | :05:35. | |
Between London and Birmingham it is about capacity not speed. North of | :05:36. | :05:40. | |
Birmingham, it is about connectivity. It is a simple case to | :05:41. | :05:45. | |
make, but it is only in the last month that they have been making | :05:46. | :05:49. | |
that case. It shows really terrible complacency in the coalition that | :05:50. | :05:53. | |
they haven't done that. We'll HS2 happen or not? I think it will. For | :05:54. | :05:59. | |
the reasons that Nick outlined, there is not of a constituency for | :06:00. | :06:09. | |
it amongst Northern areas. -- there is enough of a constituency for it. | :06:10. | :06:14. | |
There is private investment as well. It isn't like Heathrow. I say no, | :06:15. | :06:20. | |
because I think Labour will drop their support for it. Caroline Flint | :06:21. | :06:27. | |
said she was in favour of the concept of trains generally, but | :06:28. | :06:31. | |
will it go further than that? It is difficult to see how it will go | :06:32. | :06:38. | |
ahead if Labour will not support it after setting five tests that it | :06:39. | :06:42. | |
clearly will not meet. Some will breathe a sigh of relief. Some will | :06:43. | :06:49. | |
say, even in the 20th century, we cannot build a proper rail network. | :06:50. | :06:54. | |
The economy was another big story of the week. We had those GDP figures. | :06:55. | :06:59. | |
There is a video the Tories are releasing. The world premiere is | :07:00. | :07:04. | |
going to be here. Where's the red carpet? It gives an indication of | :07:05. | :07:08. | |
how the Tories will hand Mr Miliband and labour in the run-up to the | :07:09. | :07:10. | |
election. Let's have a look at it. These graphics are even worse than | :07:11. | :07:48. | |
the ones we use on our show! How on earth would you expect that to go | :07:49. | :07:56. | |
viral? It did have a strange feel about it. It doesn't understand the | :07:57. | :08:02. | |
Internet at all. Who is going to read those little screens between | :08:03. | :08:11. | |
it? Put a dog in it! However, putting that aside, I have no idea | :08:12. | :08:17. | |
that that is going to go viral. The Tories are now operating - and I say | :08:18. | :08:25. | |
Tories rather than the coalition - on the assumption that the economy | :08:26. | :08:29. | |
is improving and will continue to improve, and that that will become | :08:30. | :08:35. | |
more obvious as 2014 goes on. We just saw their how they will fight | :08:36. | :08:41. | |
the campaign. Yes, and at the crucial moment, you will reach the | :08:42. | :08:46. | |
point where wages. To rise at a faster pace than inflation, and then | :08:47. | :08:51. | |
people will start to, in the words of Harold Macmillan, feel that they | :08:52. | :08:55. | |
have never had it so good. That is the key moment. If the economy is | :08:56. | :08:59. | |
growing, there is a rule of thumb that the government should get a | :09:00. | :09:08. | |
benefit. But it doesn't always work like that. The fundamental point | :09:09. | :09:10. | |
here is that Ed Miliband has had a great month. He has totally set the | :09:11. | :09:15. | |
agenda. He has set the agenda with something - freezing energy prices - | :09:16. | :09:21. | |
that may not work. That video shows that the Conservatives want to get | :09:22. | :09:24. | |
the debate back to the fundamentals. That this is a party | :09:25. | :09:28. | |
that told us for three years that this coalition was telling us to -- | :09:29. | :09:35. | |
was taking us to hell on a handcart. That doesn't seem to have happened. | :09:36. | :09:41. | |
The energy price was a very clever thing, at the party conference | :09:42. | :09:48. | |
season, which now seems years ago. They saw that the recovery was going | :09:49. | :09:54. | |
to happen, so they changed the debate to living standards. Some | :09:55. | :09:57. | |
economists are now privately expecting growth to be 3% next year, | :09:58. | :10:02. | |
which was inconceivable for five months ago. If growth is 3% next | :10:03. | :10:06. | |
year, living standards will start to rise again. Where does Labour go | :10:07. | :10:13. | |
then? I would go further, and say that even though Ed Miliband has | :10:14. | :10:17. | |
made a small political victory on living standards, it hasn't | :10:18. | :10:21. | |
registered in the polls. Those polls have been contracted since April -- | :10:22. | :10:28. | |
have been contracting since April. That macro economic story matters | :10:29. | :10:31. | |
more than the issue of living standards. The interesting thing | :10:32. | :10:36. | |
about the recovery is it confounds everybody. No one was predicting, | :10:37. | :10:41. | |
not the Treasury, not the media, not the IMF, not the academics, and the | :10:42. | :10:49. | |
only people I can think of... I fit -- I thought they knew everything! | :10:50. | :10:55. | |
The only people I know who did are one adviser who is very close to | :10:56. | :10:59. | |
George Osborne, and the clever hedge fund is who were buying British | :11:00. | :11:04. | |
equities back in January. Because the Treasury's record is so | :11:05. | :11:07. | |
appalling, no one believe them, but they were saying around February, | :11:08. | :11:12. | |
March this year, that by the end of the summer, the recovery would be | :11:13. | :11:17. | |
gathering momentum. For once, they turned out to be right! They said | :11:18. | :11:25. | |
that the economy would be going gang bust is! Where did the new Tory | :11:26. | :11:33. | |
voters come from? I agree, if the economic recovery continues, the | :11:34. | :11:38. | |
coalition will be stronger. But where will they get new voters from? | :11:39. | :11:45. | |
For people who sign up to help to buy, they will be locked into nice | :11:46. | :11:49. | |
mortgages at a low interest rate, and just as you go into a general | :11:50. | :11:57. | |
election, if you are getting 3% growth and unemployment is down, the | :11:58. | :11:59. | |
Bank of England will have to review their interest rates. People who are | :12:00. | :12:02. | |
getting nice interest rates now may find that it is not like that in a | :12:03. | :12:09. | |
few months time. The point John Major was making implicitly was that | :12:10. | :12:14. | |
Mrs Thatcher could speak to people on low incomes. John Major could not | :12:15. | :12:19. | |
speak to them -- John Major could speak to them. But this coalition | :12:20. | :12:24. | |
cannot speak to them. This idea about the reshuffle was that David | :12:25. | :12:27. | |
Cameron wanted more Northern voices, more women, to make it look like it | :12:28. | :12:38. | |
was not a party of seven men. When David Cameron became leader, John | :12:39. | :12:41. | |
Major said, I do not speak very often, but when I do, I will help | :12:42. | :12:45. | |
you, because I think you are good thing and I do not want to be like | :12:46. | :12:50. | |
Margaret Thatcher. But that speech was clearly a lament for the party | :12:51. | :12:55. | |
he believed that David Cameron was going to lead and create, but that | :12:56. | :13:01. | |
isn't happening. And energy prices continue into this coming week. We | :13:02. | :13:05. | |
have the companies going before a select committee. My information is | :13:06. | :13:09. | |
they are sending along the secondary division, not the boss. How can they | :13:10. | :13:16. | |
get along -- get away with that? I got the letter through from British | :13:17. | :13:19. | |
Gas this week explaining why my bills are going up, and at no point | :13:20. | :13:24. | |
since this became a story have any of the big companies handled it | :13:25. | :13:28. | |
well. I will have to leave it there. Make sure you pay your bill! That's | :13:29. | :13:33. | |
it for today. The Daily Politics is back on BBC Two tomorrow. I will be | :13:34. | :13:42. | |
back here on BBC One next Sunday. Remember, if it's Sunday, it is The | :13:43. | :13:45. | |
Sunday Politics. | :13:46. | :13:52. |