Browse content similar to 08/03/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
ex-boyfriends about the history of violence against women. -- | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
ex-boyfriend who had a history of violence. | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
Now, it is time for Talking Business With Linda Yueh. | :00:07. | :00:10. | |
Could China have a banking crisis? Although its leaders will try to | :00:11. | :00:14. | |
tackle the issue at the annual meeting of its less lecture, is it | :00:15. | :00:18. | |
too late to do anything about shadow banks? -- Le ghost sure... | :00:19. | :00:45. | |
Welcome to the programme. China has gone from a nation of savers to one | :00:46. | :00:51. | |
repeat with borrowers. In the five years since the global crisis, debt | :00:52. | :00:56. | |
has skyrocketed. Worryingly, borrowing is not from banks but from | :00:57. | :01:01. | |
unregulated shadow banks. I went to find out the scale of the problem. | :01:02. | :01:07. | |
It takes money to make money, they say. To keep up growth, China has | :01:08. | :01:14. | |
relied on credit since 2008. It has led to an explosion of an regulated | :01:15. | :01:19. | |
lending. Otherwise called the sinister sounding shadow banking. | :01:20. | :01:27. | |
Shadow banking, on Rigoletto blending. By definition, no one | :01:28. | :01:32. | |
knows the scale of the problem but estimates are the debt increases | :01:33. | :01:39. | |
200% of GDP. No wonder people are wondering if shadow banks could | :01:40. | :01:44. | |
bring down China. This is what the government is afraid of. Captured by | :01:45. | :01:48. | |
CCTV, these investors lost their money to a bad loan and have taken | :01:49. | :01:54. | |
matters into their own hands to get it back. For others, it is more of a | :01:55. | :02:04. | |
quiet despair. Xia Hua does not want us to show her face. Attracted by | :02:05. | :02:08. | |
higher interest rates than she would ever get from a bank, she lost her | :02:09. | :02:12. | |
mother is like sending is -- life savings lending to a shadow banker. | :02:13. | :02:18. | |
His business collapsed and he committed suicide. TRANSLATION: One | :02:19. | :02:23. | |
I found out, could notch sleep at all for a few nights. -- I could not | :02:24. | :02:29. | |
sleep at all. When we lent the money we thought it was a good investment | :02:30. | :02:32. | |
because the interest rates were so high. I ask, does her mother no? | :02:33. | :02:43. | |
TRANSLATION: And cannot tell my mum. She has high blood pressure and she | :02:44. | :02:47. | |
cannot take such bad news. I will try everything to fill in the whole, | :02:48. | :02:52. | |
even if I have to borrow money from other people. Like many others, she | :02:53. | :03:00. | |
is enticed -- was enticed into an informal lending system which exists | :03:01. | :03:02. | |
everywhere but is particularly a problem in China because of tight | :03:03. | :03:08. | |
state control of credit. For private companies like this card | :03:09. | :03:14. | |
factory, shadow loans are the only way they can grow. TRANSLATION: | :03:15. | :03:23. | |
factory, shadow loans are the only The CEO tells me he pays 30% | :03:24. | :03:26. | |
interest to borrow from shadow banks. TRANSLATION: We still prefer | :03:27. | :03:31. | |
to use shadow banking as a way to get money and solve our business | :03:32. | :03:36. | |
problems. It is efficient and quick even though the rate is higher than | :03:37. | :03:40. | |
the banks. Could the factory survive if there was not shadow banking? | :03:41. | :03:48. | |
Maybe we could still survive but we would have to do business on a | :03:49. | :03:53. | |
smaller scale. We probably could not take on any big clients. The pyramid | :03:54. | :04:02. | |
of debt has risen quickly. Two years ago, it came crashing down on | :04:03. | :04:10. | |
China's east coast. There, 90% of companies borrow from shadow banks. | :04:11. | :04:14. | |
More than half of households do, too. | :04:15. | :04:21. | |
After the quiet crisis, when Joe is leading the nation in trying to | :04:22. | :04:28. | |
register these loans. I was there on the first day of the amnesty but | :04:29. | :04:33. | |
surprisingly, no shadow bankers or borrowers turned up. Despite the | :04:34. | :04:35. | |
unpromising start, the lawmaker leading the charge says that they | :04:36. | :04:44. | |
must do something. TRANSLATION: Shadow banking has reached a high | :04:45. | :04:48. | |
level. Without any law and supervision such a huge amount of | :04:49. | :04:51. | |
loans would pose a big threat. There is no supervision, before, during | :04:52. | :04:56. | |
and after the loans are made. The government only steps in when the | :04:57. | :05:00. | |
crisis happens. It is so risky and has caused many crises. At the Shark | :05:01. | :05:13. | |
Bar, aptly named, I met A'Fu, an educator by day and shady lender by | :05:14. | :05:17. | |
night. Regardless of the law, shadow bankers are seizing the opportunity. | :05:18. | :05:22. | |
How do you see yourself? Some people say that shadow banking is | :05:23. | :05:27. | |
destroying the economy and others say that without you, there would be | :05:28. | :05:32. | |
no growth in China. TRANSLATION: If we can control the rest, we are | :05:33. | :05:36. | |
helping the economy. Many businessmen need money urgently. | :05:37. | :05:41. | |
Only by getting it from us can they do business. -- control the risk. We | :05:42. | :05:46. | |
get a nice profit and they do business. It is good for the | :05:47. | :05:51. | |
economy. If the system collapses, the best case is a government rescue | :05:52. | :05:56. | |
which derails growth. The worst-case is that it bankrupts the nation. | :05:57. | :06:01. | |
Either way, there is a quiet menace lying just underneath the surface of | :06:02. | :06:09. | |
China's impressive growth. Can the problem of shadow banks be | :06:10. | :06:15. | |
addressed? To find out, I asked two experts. A senior fellow at Renmin | :06:16. | :06:24. | |
University, and a representative from Gavekal Dragonomics. Lovely to | :06:25. | :06:30. | |
have you both with us. Can you start by asking the big question? How big | :06:31. | :06:37. | |
a problem is shadow banking and could China's economy? It is | :06:38. | :06:42. | |
becoming more serious in China. It could damage the Chinese economy and | :06:43. | :06:50. | |
the financial reform here, if we would still allow them to continue | :06:51. | :06:58. | |
without control, it could damage the system. But I think it is still | :06:59. | :07:03. | |
under control. Do you agree that it is under control? It has been around | :07:04. | :07:08. | |
a long time. Let me put some numbers to illustrate my points. Currently, | :07:09. | :07:13. | |
shadow banking by our measurement accounts for 20% of the Chinese | :07:14. | :07:20. | |
total credit. And the ratio is not that big, compared with other | :07:21. | :07:25. | |
countries. But the growth rate is quite astonishing. By the end of | :07:26. | :07:30. | |
2007, the number was close to 2%. Now we see 20%. So it is growing at | :07:31. | :07:40. | |
an astonishing rate. The problem is that there is an inherent problem in | :07:41. | :07:45. | |
China over the last decade, which is that the economy is reliant on | :07:46. | :07:47. | |
credit growth. Both of you are saying that shadow banking has grown | :07:48. | :07:53. | |
rapidly over the last few years. I suppose that leads to the next | :07:54. | :07:58. | |
question. Which is, can it be reformed, can it be controlled? I | :07:59. | :08:02. | |
think it can be reformed and controlled. As we say, the total | :08:03. | :08:11. | |
percentage of the growth of shadow banking in China is under control. | :08:12. | :08:21. | |
It has almost stopped in some provinces. But the potential of | :08:22. | :08:29. | |
shadow banking in China is significant. There are still some | :08:30. | :08:38. | |
markets here. I heard it said that shadow banking came from the shadow | :08:39. | :08:49. | |
economy. In China, the shadow economy is growing strongly. Can it | :08:50. | :08:52. | |
be reformed? Some of these companies, we do not have the data. | :08:53. | :08:58. | |
The problem is that they are doing the same thing as traditional and | :08:59. | :09:03. | |
King was. But the underlying capital is limited compared to traditional | :09:04. | :09:10. | |
banking laws. You do not have banking licences. If you had to make | :09:11. | :09:21. | |
a 100 Zhou Dewen loan, you would have to make... A bank making a 100% | :09:22. | :09:30. | |
loan would have to hold 5%. The trust company will just lend out | :09:31. | :09:33. | |
100. In that case, is there enough tracking of them to make sure that | :09:34. | :09:38. | |
they can be readily did? That is what the government is trying to do | :09:39. | :09:43. | |
right now. Yes, it is what they are trying to do but there is an | :09:44. | :09:47. | |
intrinsic conflict between sharp credit growth and the slowing down | :09:48. | :09:53. | |
of GDP growth. You do not think it is likely that they can? If they | :09:54. | :09:58. | |
want to restrict the growth of shadow banking that means that | :09:59. | :10:01. | |
credit growth will slow down more sharply and GDP growth will | :10:02. | :10:09. | |
increase. Five or 6%. That would be very slow. Do you agree that the | :10:10. | :10:11. | |
government might say they want to regulate it at either they cannot or | :10:12. | :10:15. | |
it goes against their interests to slow down growth? Central government | :10:16. | :10:23. | |
will want to control the risk. But local government, they are | :10:24. | :10:30. | |
reluctant. There is one case in China, which says that these reforms | :10:31. | :10:42. | |
show that a defeat is not a victory. We made no progress in reforming | :10:43. | :10:45. | |
because the local interests of the government got in the way. A neat | :10:46. | :10:49. | |
shadow banking. They do not want to put reform in place. The interest | :10:50. | :10:57. | |
groups are so complex that not only do they affect the companies, but | :10:58. | :11:01. | |
they dominate banking. They lend money to shadow bankers. Because | :11:02. | :11:09. | |
they get high feedback. There is a well-known case of ICBC, | :11:10. | :11:14. | |
state-owned, connected to one of these trust companies that make the | :11:15. | :11:17. | |
loans. So it is all interconnected. But let me ask you, one of the big | :11:18. | :11:22. | |
things, the big question surrounding shadow banks, if there is not the | :11:23. | :11:27. | |
political will to regulate it, and there's a lot of natural demand for | :11:28. | :11:31. | |
these loans, what if it all goes wrong? What if the entire shadow | :11:32. | :11:38. | |
banking system leads to a banking crisis in China? Could that happen | :11:39. | :11:42. | |
and what would be the consequences for China? So far, I think the | :11:43. | :11:48. | |
probability of a general banking crisis in China is quite low. But | :11:49. | :11:54. | |
since growth is quite high, it is not impossible in the next couple of | :11:55. | :11:59. | |
years. We never know. But I think in the next two years, shadow banking | :12:00. | :12:07. | |
will be regulated and under control. I think shadow banking will | :12:08. | :12:13. | |
require the market to be limited. Because our GDP growth will be lower | :12:14. | :12:22. | |
than ever before. Even 2% lower than 9% or 10%, no we will have 7.7%, and | :12:23. | :12:30. | |
that would be lower. The interest rates required from shadow | :12:31. | :12:34. | |
banking... The local government that grows GDP, they will demand also | :12:35. | :12:40. | |
that it is moderated. So that it is not so progressive or aggressive. | :12:41. | :12:43. | |
That could be good for the shadow banking reform. So your view is that | :12:44. | :12:48. | |
as long as growth slows and demand slows, China could probably manage | :12:49. | :12:54. | |
shadow banking. But if it cannot, will it have global consequences? I | :12:55. | :13:00. | |
think it will damage the Asian financial market first. Will it be | :13:01. | :13:05. | |
another Lehman Brothers? It could expand to European countries. China | :13:06. | :13:12. | |
has close connections with American development. And that could also | :13:13. | :13:19. | |
have another sub-prime crisis as its results. Could this be the next | :13:20. | :13:27. | |
Lehman Brothers moment? I do not think so. I think the Chinese | :13:28. | :13:29. | |
government has the ability to save any bank it once. I think there is | :13:30. | :13:34. | |
another consequence which is that the credit expansion will stop and | :13:35. | :13:38. | |
leveraging will happen, no matter what China once. The damage will be | :13:39. | :13:44. | |
first on the Asian economies who have a lot of exposure from China, | :13:45. | :13:49. | |
Taiwan, Korea, Malaysia. China is the largest trading partner for | :13:50. | :13:52. | |
them. Australia, Brazil, South Africa, other major countries. The | :13:53. | :14:02. | |
main exposure is property developers and coalminers. That represents the | :14:03. | :14:05. | |
Chinese investment. If the investment demands drop sharply, | :14:06. | :14:14. | |
demand from Brazil will also collapse. Finally, we have talked | :14:15. | :14:21. | |
about shadow banking, and I'm just called to ask you both, flat-out, | :14:22. | :14:25. | |
will China has a shadow banking crisis in the next five years? Yes | :14:26. | :14:32. | |
no. -- yes or no. I do not believe we will have this crisis in the next | :14:33. | :14:37. | |
five years but I think in China we will have another more serious | :14:38. | :14:40. | |
challenge than shadow banking. I cannot say it will not happen this | :14:41. | :14:44. | |
year but in five years, I do not know. A good note to end on. Thank | :14:45. | :14:54. | |
you both. This issue will be centre of the annual meeting of the | :14:55. | :14:58. | |
National People's Congress that started this week. This will be the | :14:59. | :15:01. | |
first session in which the new Chinese leaders will specify how | :15:02. | :15:08. | |
they achieve their aims that were outlined at the meeting last autumn. | :15:09. | :15:11. | |
One key challenge will be addressing corruption. | :15:12. | :15:18. | |
Damien Grammaticas reports. Rising China. This is a nation whose | :15:19. | :15:24. | |
leaders are determined, unlike dynasty's past, not to lose their | :15:25. | :15:29. | |
hold on power. Discontent is widespread. On | :15:30. | :15:34. | |
Tiananmen Square this week, quickly quashed, the stifling of dissent | :15:35. | :15:39. | |
getting tougher. A stone's throw away, the leaders | :15:40. | :15:44. | |
paused to remember the 29 people killed in last weekend's attack he | :15:45. | :15:51. | |
the city of Kunming. They see other threats to the party's power too. So | :15:52. | :15:58. | |
they are pressing economic reforms into corruption: We'll energetically | :15:59. | :16:03. | |
build a system for combatting corruption, resolutely investigate | :16:04. | :16:05. | |
cases and penalise offenders without mercy. | :16:06. | :16:15. | |
Dozens have been detained. That's how they gain authority. It's | :16:16. | :16:20. | |
difficult to persuade other leaders, and how to make sure that the | :16:21. | :16:26. | |
corruption campaign is not too excess excessive. | :16:27. | :16:31. | |
Just three hours drive from the leader's meeting, "trust me, trust | :16:32. | :16:40. | |
me", urges an official. But as in many parts of China, they say they | :16:41. | :16:44. | |
don't trust him and they were forced to make way for development and had | :16:45. | :16:49. | |
to leave their homes. The way China's system works means | :16:50. | :16:53. | |
corruption exists at every level to really root it out will require deep | :16:54. | :16:59. | |
seated reform, not just to high profile campaigns, the promises are | :17:00. | :17:03. | |
raising expectation along the masses who feel cheat and left out. The | :17:04. | :17:09. | |
question is, can he deliver? TRANSLATION: The policies have given | :17:10. | :17:14. | |
us some hope. That's why we have starteded fighting for our rights. | :17:15. | :17:19. | |
We want what we were promised. TRANSLATION: They beat us, used | :17:20. | :17:23. | |
explosives to scare us. They haven't given us the money or the houses | :17:24. | :17:30. | |
they promised. Then thugs blocked us as we tried to film the new flats. | :17:31. | :17:38. | |
The elderly protesters were furious. Lop developer, one of China's | :17:39. | :17:42. | |
largest, says it's paid the local government over $60 million for the | :17:43. | :17:49. | |
land. But the money's gone. It's Ping's fear, corruption if unchecked | :17:50. | :17:53. | |
threatening a crisis for China's commune US party. | :17:54. | :17:59. | |
So, it's not just Shadow banks, there are numerous issues to | :18:00. | :18:05. | |
address, including corruption and slowing economic growth. What could | :18:06. | :18:11. | |
the Chinese legislator propose? I went to find out by speaking to | :18:12. | :18:17. | |
someone who's been in China for a long time and has worked in the | :18:18. | :18:29. | |
financial sector. What do we expect from the congress? | :18:30. | :18:34. | |
We could follow on a continuing trend from last year. Many things | :18:35. | :18:37. | |
have happened last year in terms of reform. The national people's | :18:38. | :18:48. | |
congress will... This next is codifying into law the various | :18:49. | :18:54. | |
things which the party's already, been addressing... We have seen | :18:55. | :18:57. | |
movements in the privatisation of different sectors. We have seen the | :18:58. | :19:02. | |
breaking up of of some of the state monopolies, and a lot more will | :19:03. | :19:07. | |
come. The cutting back of power of a number of state entities, such as | :19:08. | :19:12. | |
the developing reform commission to allow greater forces of market to | :19:13. | :19:15. | |
play. That's been the real big theme | :19:16. | :19:20. | |
hasn't it, greater competition, raising efficiency, helping gross. A | :19:21. | :19:25. | |
lot of people will say, are these true reforms that will really raise | :19:26. | :19:30. | |
productivity, or are they just a bit of lip service because Chinese | :19:31. | :19:33. | |
growth is slowing, they need to do something. Will this be enough? It | :19:34. | :19:38. | |
depends on how you address growth. You can have growth that is totally | :19:39. | :19:43. | |
basically using investments to pump up, build more roads and highways. | :19:44. | :19:47. | |
It's a question of quality of growth. I'm a firm believer that if | :19:48. | :20:02. | |
growth is upped, 5% is fine. I think what will happen is a true reform. | :20:03. | :20:08. | |
For those of us with our boots on the ground and doing this in | :20:09. | :20:11. | |
practise, we are beginning to discover a lot of things that were | :20:12. | :20:15. | |
shocking that were uncon-Sealable a year-and-a-half ago. Such as? The | :20:16. | :20:20. | |
privatisation of the telecommunications sector. 11 | :20:21. | :20:25. | |
virtual private 4G licences have been issued in all kinds of domain | :20:26. | :20:34. | |
for these basically beginning of the breaking up of the power to state | :20:35. | :20:41. | |
monopoly in the Telecom sector and the banking sector. The online | :20:42. | :20:47. | |
banking system? Yes. But do you think they could really do something | :20:48. | :20:52. | |
about the state-owned banks? That's become an issue. Their dominance is | :20:53. | :20:57. | |
one of the reasons why shadow banking formal lending has... They | :20:58. | :21:03. | |
basically sit pretty and charge huge margins. The spread between loan and | :21:04. | :21:08. | |
deposit is huge and it's the small savers who really have been beaten | :21:09. | :21:14. | |
up in the process. But what Alibaba has done is to squeeze that margin. | :21:15. | :21:21. | |
If all of this leads to first and foremost, higher efficiency among | :21:22. | :21:24. | |
the banks in terms of their management and lowering the burden | :21:25. | :21:30. | |
on the savers, something good has already occurred. | :21:31. | :21:34. | |
I think these are things that I don't think Alibaba or Ten Cent | :21:35. | :21:40. | |
develop the systems without a nod from the very top of the country | :21:41. | :21:44. | |
because these cost them dearly in terms of investments as well and | :21:45. | :21:48. | |
developing these programmes. So their must have had some hint | :21:49. | :21:53. | |
that these things would be welcomed or be allowed and they did. And this | :21:54. | :21:59. | |
is the first big legislative session under the new President and Premier. | :22:00. | :22:06. | |
Do you think it's going to have some traits about it that would give, I | :22:07. | :22:11. | |
don't know, businesses, foreign companies confidence that they are | :22:12. | :22:17. | |
on the right track? OK - I would separate the two categories that you | :22:18. | :22:21. | |
describe - business and foreign companies. Try knees companies have | :22:22. | :22:28. | |
gotten beaten up when they go abroad. I think foreign companies | :22:29. | :22:37. | |
are going to expect pretty stringent regulatory control by the | :22:38. | :22:42. | |
Government. But the deregulation of the sectors is really taking place | :22:43. | :22:47. | |
and it's taking place very rapidly, even the major oil companies are | :22:48. | :22:53. | |
forced to come out with proposals for spinning off different | :22:54. | :22:58. | |
operations and allowing private Capitol to come in. I think this | :22:59. | :23:04. | |
session is not going to be marked by anything particularly significant | :23:05. | :23:07. | |
but it's a continuation of a process that begun at the beginning of last | :23:08. | :23:12. | |
year when the new administration began. For those of us who are | :23:13. | :23:17. | |
practition practitioners in the field, we do see de deregulation, | :23:18. | :23:24. | |
the loosening up of controls and lesser government interdepeerns | :23:25. | :23:27. | |
taking place. That was Charles Liu. -- | :23:28. | :23:34. | |
interference. There's a lot for China to tackle in | :23:35. | :23:39. | |
the coming week. Top of the agenda should be Shadow banking because it | :23:40. | :23:44. | |
could pose a grave risk to the world economy. | :23:45. | :23:46. | |
That's all we have time for this week. Check out the website and me | :23:47. | :23:56. | |
on Twitter. Join us next week for more Talking Business with Melinda | :23:57. | :24:02. | |
Yueh. -- with me, Linda Yueh. Pf | :24:03. | :24:12. | |
Hello, it's been raining all day | :24:13. | :24:14. |