19/01/2014 The Papers

Police and St Lucia are questioning three men about the death of British

man Roger Pratt, who was killed as he tried to protect his wife from

attackers on board their yacht. Hello and welcome to our look ahead

to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. With us are Tom Chivers

of the Telegraph and Anne Ashworth. Both of your papers are in the

stack. Let's start with the front pages. A photo of British man Roger

Pratt, murdered whilst holidaying with his wife Margaret in St Lucia,

is on the front page of the Telegraph. The paper also carries a

special report claims that UK is Lynne is fighting in Syria have been

trained to return to this country to carry out attacks -- is Lynne is

this. Chocolate can cut the risk of

developing diabetes, says the Daily Express. The paper reports that red

wine, tea and berries also help. Teachers and 130 public schools have

been implicated in sex crimes against hundreds of children, claims

the Times. A dramatic picture of violent protests in the Ukrainian

capital Kiev is on the front page of the Financial Times. The paper also

reports that David Cameron may be isolating himself in Europe. And the

Queen is taking a back-seat when it comes to some royal, says the Daily

Mirror. Prince Charles is stepping in and taking the reins in what is

seen as a move towards him becoming king. And the Daily Mail runs with

its main story on a letter from Iain Duncan Smith entries may saying

Britain's welfare system should not be a magnet for members of other EU

states. So let's begin, starting with the Guardian. The headliners,

patient records to be sold from NHS database. This is a single English

database of medical information that is being created. We're getting

through the post. I certainly have, information saying, if you want to

opt out of the ability for this information to be shared more

widely, that is what you need to do. On the face of it, Tom, this is

something that might make a lot of people fearful. It may do. People

are now so constantly aware of threats to privacy from all sorts of

routes, but this is, to me this seems a pretty straightforwardly

good thing. I was speaking to some people yesterday, and they feel it

is absolutely, this will allow huge improvements in how they can share

and therefore do research. Things that are difficult to do

old-fashioned, randomised controlled trials, they will be easier to do.

Things like the link between autism and MMR, the disapproving of that,

was possible through medical data through this. They just looked at

the data. Exactly, they looked at the data of people who had been

treated in the past. It's genuinely saves lives. Of course, there are

concerns over privacy and it has to be dealt with sensibly. But I think

this is one of those times when privacy is not a problem. This is a

way of saving lives. I wonder if anyone doesn't have our data

already? There are concerns as to who will have access to these

records. You don't have a choice in who gets the information. You either

have to say, no, I don't want it to give a note or I do. There is no

halfway. It does for the first time explained that rather strange letter

that we got from the NHS. Askin about, reassuring us about the way

in which our information was being shared. It is a flyer that comes

through the door explaining the situation, it is not addressed to us

individually, necessarily. Isn't it the case that a lot of people just

will not act upon it, either through inertia are not understanding the

implications? That may well be the case. Presumably those people are

not overly worried about the NHS having their data. You are now

beginning to assume that nothing is private any more. That all

information is being shared. We know from previous editions of the

Guardian and all of the Snowdon revelations that nothing is secret

any more. But I just love this word, pseudonymous Asian, which is making

all of the information anonymous. -- pseudonymisation. This article says

the extracted information will contain your NHS number, unique to

the individual, date of birth, postcode, you could probably find

out who that is. There will be times when data can only be useful when it

is barely identifiable. In those cases, clinicians will have to make

stringent cases. -- fairly identifiable. They will have to make

a case to the regulator. Normally it is not quite as straightforward as

that. The conspiracy theorists will pounce on this story, but I think we

all have to conclude that it is essentially for our good. Let's move

on and look at the Daily Telegraph. Britain sent by Al-Qaeda -- Britons

sent by Al-Qaeda. Security forces reckon there are about 500 British

people who have gone to take up arms in Syria. And they will bring back

with them at some point the skills, if you can college that, the

know-how of how to stage attacks like 9/11, like the July bombings in

London. This is a new aspects to the Syrian conflict, this idea that it

is becoming a training place. This place really have advanced tutorials

on how to become a terrorist. Late last year, MI5 were talking about

that being one of the central concerns about Syria. But it was a

training ground for terrorists who can attack us here. This is putting

flesh on the bones of those fears. If there are over 500, might they

have an idea of who the 500 are? You wonder, although how often has that

worked in the past? It's amazing how much the security services delve

into our lives and then let people slip through anyway. I think this is

going to be high on the agenda, at the Geneva II talks. As to exactly

how Al-Qaeda is allowed, is sending out its emissary is all over the

world from the Syrian conflict. We know that the Syrian opposition is

made up of so many factions, and that Al-Qaeda is such a powerful

part of that, . Only last Friday, two men from Birmingham were

charged, we reported it year, with travelling to Syria to carry out

acts of terrorism. The assumption wasn't necessarily that they were

going to bring that back here, which is a very different thing. It has

always been what happens for ever with terrorist cells, they go to the

lawless places in the world. The Yemen, Afghanistan, places on the

Pakistan border. Syria has exploded, it is now a lawless place where you

can learn to fight and go and fight and learn these awful skills. It is

a sobering, serious night in the newspapers. It is the second story

that causes you to think. Very serious story. Let's stay with the

Telegraph. Lord Rennard is ready to defy Clegg and rejoin the Lib Dem

peer 's. This story has been bubbling away for days and will be

very interesting tomorrow. Nick Clegg wants an apology from Lord

Rennard. He continues to say he has not done anything wrong. There is

now beyond reasonable doubt case to be brought against him. -- no

reasonable doubt case. It is not something that can be actions. --

actioned legally. Nick Clegg is in a bind with this. Poor Nick Clegg. The

man keeps getting caught up in what is essentially the minutia of the

management of his party rather than forming policy. For women for

example, this is going to put the Lib Dems in quite a poor light. That

is exactly what Nick Clegg is wanting to avoid. But there doesn't

seem to be any way out for him. Neither are his peers in the Lords

giving Nick Clegg and out, I can't understand why. Somebody should be

finding a graceful exit from the situation. He ends up looking so

weak. Without worrying about the situation, by crikey, I demand an

apology. How can you demand an apology from someone who maintains,

still says I have not done anything wrong. There is no case being

brought against me. It is not up to the party leader to decide. It is up

to the peers. It almost looks like a foregone conclusion that it will

happen tomorrow. The biggest split seems to be between the two sides of

what is quite a small party. 54 seats. Yet this is beginning to

overwhelm everything else that we know about the Lib Dems. Let's look

at the Times. 130 primary -- drive its schools in -- Private schools.

Implicated in sex crimes against hundreds of children. Can I show you

the graphic? I don't think we can any more. Where are you? There you

are, not the women in the low-cut top, it is this. This is very, very

well-known schools, top schools in the country. Places like Eton

College and the like. Connected with this decades of abuse. I find

interesting, one of the reasons why this is all coming to light is that

people are more willing, it is no more respectable to say this is

abuse, not the sort of thing we don't talk about. I remember reading

in Richard Dawkins' biography, something that happened in school.

Growing up with a stiff upper lip. Your parents are paying handsomely

for it. Exactly, so you can't complain, but note, this is not all

right. It is the reputation of the schools that is damaged. They will

be concerned by this story. Some teachers seem to have been prolific

abusers allowed to move from job to job, that is the thing that will

most concerned parents. Let's finish with the Financial Times. Here we

are. It is more reliable, me holding it up. Cameron at odds with EU

allies on migration. David Cameron was hoping that Germany and a few

others would support him on restricting movement around the EU.

But they think it is a really good idea, so they are not going to. They

have got an influx of educated Italians, Spaniards, who have

learned the language and they see it has done wonders for their

workforce, probably boosted their economy. Cameron had, for some

reason, thought that the Germans would side with him. It must have

come from somewhere, in the corridors of power in Brussels, some

conference or other, he must have got the distinct impression from

somebody in Germany. It would require completely uprooting

everything that the whole system is based around. You wonder if it is

almost wishful thinking thing, he realises the only way he can sell

the EU to his own party and to the Eurosceptic wing is by saying,

please someone in Germany just throw me a bone. He won't get many

concessions. Now, all alone. It shows again, migration, the big

political topic. We are some way off the election but we are not done

talking about it. We will carry on talking about it at 11:30pm as well.

Anna and Tom will be back with us again. Stay with us here on BBC

News. We will have more about the pressure mounting against Lord

Rennard, the Lib Dem peer. Next, it is time for Click.

Engine off. No, engine off. Engine off!