No need to wait to see what's in the papers - tune in for a lively and informed conversation about the next day's headlines.
Browse content similar to 19/08/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be
With me are Benedicte Paviot from France 24 and the editor
Tomorrow's front pages starting with...
The Times says followers of the radical preacher
Anjem Choudary are spreading hatred and Islamist doctrines freely
across the internet despite his conviction.
Nick Skelton is pictured on the Telegraph
Its main story focuses on the Help To Buy ISA.
It says the government's top up cannot be used for
The Mail says Theresa May has ordered a victory
parade 'fit for heroes' to welcome home Britain's Olympic team.
The FT reports that Royal Bank of Scotland will charge
some large corporate customers for holding their cash.
The Express reports on moves in the City of London
to prepare for Britain's exit from the EU.
And the Guardian looks at the effect on women seeking
abortions after services run by Marie Stopes were suddenly halted
Let's begin with the story of the heroes coming home to a heroes'
welcome on the front page of the Mail. Interesting to see that the
new boss of the UK, Theresa May, is interrupting her Swiss walking
holiday and apparently according to the Daily Mail, they seem to know
that she ordered a victory parade fit for heroes to welcome home
Britain's Olympic team. They certainly are extraordinary. What
we've been witnessing I gather on BBC One and BBC Two, the ice fog
women's final. I feel like I need a manual now -- ice hockey. What are
the British team on? Belief is extraordinary. To watch that
sacrifice over four years we haven't seen and then to watch these
results. They are all egging each other on but if you haven't done the
training then it won't happen. I have to say before I moved to Kevin,
with your French heritage, what do the French make of it trailing in
the wake? Trailing in the wake definitely, nine golds, seventh or
eighth I think. Extraordinary. The French cycling team, we know what
they think, they think the British team to disappear for a cycle they
say. What is interesting is the lottery funding. Clearly the British
teams know that they must do well at the Olympics so they focus on the
Olympics. But we know from London 2012, ancient history now, that the
French were very disappointed, they were world champions and they were
astonished, they accused the British of using special warmers for their
muscles and all kinds of things. We are not giving away any secrets
here! I am British and French so I can give some of them. Talking about
the parade, I as a northerner and pleased it is in Manchester I have
to say. I thought Dame Tessa Jau got it spot on. I don't want to
politicise it but was the government slow on this? It seems incredible
there was any doubt there would be some kind of a parade, I would think
there is a matter of course with this, given how successful Team GB
has been, that there wouldn't be an opportunity for the country to come
together and for ordinary members of the public to come out and see them
parading through the streets. Obviously it happened in London,
after the 2008 Beijing Olympics as well, I would have thought this has
been organised well in advance but it looks like it has been an
afterthought and they would have to step up to the plate at the last
minute. It is a nice touch it isn't in London. You think it is right and
proper to be outside London? It is very easy for these things to become
London centric and people assume it has to be the UK capital so it is
good to take it further north and that allows people from elsewhere in
the country to share in it. There will also be an event in London so
it is a good idea. Manchester isn't quite before midnight confirmed but
it is what the Daily Mail are saying. And other news channel is
confirming that. We will come back to Rio. Let's have a look at the
other headlines before we do that. Starting with this story in the
Times, is it any great surprise with Anjem Choudary out of the way there
are still acolytes putting videos on the web? The fact of the matter is
the one that has been charged and convicted is Anjem Choudary. What
this article in the Times talks about is the fact that the Internet
is failing to take down his acolytes, the people that he has
convinced. I think the fact of the matter is what this underlines is
the fact YouTube really is a fantastic, as we know, platform, and
that this really needs policing, that's the word that is appropriate.
Because the Internet has just become this extraordinary platform for all
kinds of things. But it does mean that there needs to be a real
policy, whether it's from the UK government, the French government,
there needs to be a consistent policy and therefore discussions
with YouTube and Twitter and social media, but we know that when things
are taken down they often reappear. This is very important because what
we have seen and what the intelligence services in France and
Britain and Germany and Switzerland and elsewhere are telling us clearly
is that it is no longer in mosques that people are being radicalised,
it's in their bedrooms via the Internet that contracts are being
made. We think the Nice attack... Another person died today so the
death toll in Nice is now 86 dead among the many hundreds of
injured... Is that the two people we think who were responsible for the
murder of the catholic priest up near Rouen were two people that met
via social media, who had never met before. This really needs to be
addressed or else it makes a mockery of other security measures that we
are taking. There's a lot of frustration about Twitter in
particular not pulling down things that quite clearly are inflammatory.
Exactly. There's an argument when you could say that technology is
moving so quickly that as quickly as YouTube take these things down,
others can put them back up again and how do they keep on top of it?
It's quite a resource to pay for that kind of thing. You mentioned
Twitter, there was a thing this week about people saying any footage of
the Olympics that wasn't authorised was being pulled down by Twitter
instantly. It can be done. Because of corporate violations and there
was money to be made. They are saying things like Twitter trials
and abuse. Death threats, rape threats. They are much slower to
act. This is another example of the Internet, a great resource and
platform, but how it can be used and abused by people with evil intent.
Yet it needs a crackdown but how do you police it? I don't know, you can
try but it is almost like trying to hold back the tide, you know?
Talking about difficulty in policing, this takes us rather
neatly to a decision in Germany to ban the Muslim veil. A partial ban.
This is pretty divisive because lots of people are saying, hang on, you
are ordering people to bear their flesh when maybe they don't want to,
but there are other considerations, especially in fly France. One has to
be careful because people tend, for example I have seen on Twitter in
the UK to have... And they I'm titled to have very British
reactions to a British context. That they are entitled to. But then they
apply it to France and Germany -- they I'm titled to. In France there
is a law against the veil and it's a different context -- they are
entitled to. In Germany I understand, unlike France, it is a
secular state, very much for bidding wearing of the kneecap, the burqa,
in public spaces. -- for bidding the kneecap. In Germany it is freedom of
religion and trickier to implement. Apparently this isn't overly
divorced from the fact there are big elections in Germany next year.
What's interesting is the interior minister, who is half French and
half German, the Maiziere, who has talked about this and is proposing
this, it is about a partial ban on the face veil in schools and
universities. It is clear on the back of the attacks in Germany there
is a certain backlash in Germany towards Muslim refugees coming from
Afghanistan and Iraq and Syria. What the German government of Angela
Merkel are being accused of is pandering to those fears instead of
saying, as Angola Merkel said the other day, this isn't related to the
influx of refugees. You mention Angela Merkel coming under lots of
political pressure, her poll ratings are on the slide, she was very
popular, obviously there is an anxiety in Germany now, there's more
of these random, lone wolf attacks. She has been partially blamed or
wholly blamed by many people on the right in particular in Germany for
opening the doors to refugees from Syria. This I think should be seen
in that context. It is a way of saying we get it, we are not
completely pandering to them. This is a way of being tough on Islamism.
It is a gesture and it is not something we would ever see
introduced in this country. I don't think it would be implemented but it
is just talked about. It must be underlined that Germany is home to 4
million Muslims, as the paper points out, 5% of its population. France
the highest, around 6 million Muslims. Let's move on to the
Telegraph. Kevin, what about this story about the betrayal of help to
buy scheme savers. This is a terrible story and this is a
Telegraph Mac exclusive. George Osborne in what turned out to be his
last budget unveiled the help to buy ISA, which was the way the
government would top up people's savings to get a deposit for a new
home, and which, as we know in London, first-time buyers are
finding it impossible to come up with the money for a deposit. It was
widely mel, welcomed. It was a decent return, for every ?200 saved
the government would add 50, it's lots of money up to ?15,000. In the
small print it turns out it can't be used for a deposit. The money is
only released once the sale is completed. The thinking is that you
can use it for the first few months' mortgage payments or something like
that. What is the point? The argument is, what is the point? If
you can't get a deposit in the first place you will never complete on a
sale so you can't access the money. The point is you would need the 25%
on top of your savings to afford the deposit. Unless you are fortunate
enough to have rich parents, the bank of mum and dad to help you out.
This certainly wasn't how it was sold at the time by George Osborne,
who conveniently has left the stage now and it seems he has left a mess
behind him. This is embarrassing for Theresa May because one of the first
things she said when she arrived in number ten, a quality. Opportunity.
That is why the word betrayal is used by the Telegraph -- equality.
More than half a million people have taken on this Help To Buy Scheme
ISA, given the chance of getting on the ladder but now it has been taken
from under them. Moving on. The bottom of the Guardian, a story
about the children in Aleppo, we don't need reminding after the
pictures this week of the five-year-old boy who was dragged
out of a building that had been bombed. Apparently he didn't cry, I
was reading today, he has been reunited with his parents, which
hasn't been published everywhere. It seems it's only when the children
are on the front pages of the newspapers that we take any notice.
It does seem that way, but it seems when the Guardian does an excellent
article like this on the front page, that is also what real journalism is
about. Emma Graham Harrison writes a really compelling story. It is
continued on page 15. It describes this orphanage that is actually two
floors below in a basement. It is an extraordinary couple who are called
Azamar and his wife, his name isn't there a lass. But there are 50
children who are being looked after in this orphanage, which apparently
means outstanding guys. It talks about the subterranean Haven. It is
a haven for those children. Emma Graham Harrison talks about how if
we think Omran had it bad, the little child we saw bloodied and so
shocked that he couldn't even and didn't even cry, these are orphans
who have either lost both of their parents and they range in age from
two to 14, all one of their parents, their mother or father has died, and
the other has had a nervous breakdown or can't cope or has been
separated from them. These orphans are being educated. They play. They
used to be taken outside but it is now too dangerous with the Russian
airstrikes and the Syrian government bombings. Let's finish on a happier
note and look at the picture on the Daily Express. Nick Skelton, so many
good stories, you can't do them all justice, but at 58, with replacement
hip. A broken neck. Extraordinary. We've got a meeting at 16, the
youngest member of the team taking bronze, now the oldest member taking
gold. The oldest or over 100 years apparently. Since 1908 -- for over.
You want to know the oldest? He was called John Copley and he won a
silver medal in art. Art? Art was an Olympic discipline up until 1948 and
Jo his engraving was called Polo Players. The oldest Olympian was a
Swiss man who won gold that year for watercolours. What I love is this
hero... He was 73. I love the fact that Nick Skelton... Sorry, but he
had a broken neck, he's got an artificial hip and he was riding a
horse that was predestined to win this called Big Star. I love the
humility of the man who says he is almost speechless, which seems to be
rare for him, and he says then that he did really well. He's just
talking about his horse, Big Star. He doesn't even talk about his
experience or wisdom and boy did it pay off. Bravo. We are out of time.
That's it for the Papers tonight before you go these front pages have
Don't forget all the front pages are online on the BBC News website
where you can read a detailed review of the papers.
with each night's edition of The Papers being posted
on the page shortly after we've finished.