Browse content similar to 26/03/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Life on Mars. In the sci-fi horror film Life is all what it seems? Mark | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
Kermode will fill us in on The Film Review. | :00:00. | :00:11. | |
Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be | :00:12. | :00:15. | |
With me are Caroline Frost, entertainment editor | :00:16. | :00:20. | |
of the Huffington Post and parliamentary reporter | :00:21. | :00:22. | |
The Metro leads with the Home Secretary putting pressure | :00:23. | :00:33. | |
on internet companies over access to encrypted messages in the wake | :00:34. | :00:36. | |
The Guardian quotes opposition politicians, who say that | :00:37. | :00:40. | |
Amber Rudd's demand is unrealistic and disproportionate. | :00:41. | :00:48. | |
The Telegraph's also covering that story and says Amber Rudd is furious | :00:49. | :00:52. | |
that the attacker's whatsapp messages are being kept secret. | :00:53. | :00:54. | |
One of the main stories in the FT is the police clampdown | :00:55. | :00:57. | |
on anti-corruption protests in Russia. | :00:58. | :00:59. | |
The Express says that millions of families are facing | :01:00. | :01:01. | |
major council tax increases from next month. | :01:02. | :01:03. | |
The Times says Britain risks signing worthless | :01:04. | :01:05. | |
trade deals because ministers are failing to recognise | :01:06. | :01:07. | |
The Mirror's lead features the missing girl | :01:08. | :01:10. | |
Madeline McCann as a former detective claims someone | :01:11. | :01:12. | |
The paper says David Cameron's Downing Street was part of a cover | :01:13. | :01:18. | |
We'll look at some of the different coverage of this issue over WhatsApp | :01:19. | :01:31. | |
and why you can or shouldn't be able to access messages sent on that | :01:32. | :01:39. | |
platform after what Amber Rudd said today. Rudd unrealistic says the | :01:40. | :01:45. | |
Guardian to allow access to WhatsApp, the Home Secretary refuses | :01:46. | :01:48. | |
to rule out an encryption law after the attack but she wants to appeal | :01:49. | :01:52. | |
to the companies to do the right thing and inshore messages can be | :01:53. | :01:56. | |
accessed. Yes, which as you can imagine is her preferred option | :01:57. | :02:00. | |
because if they can that means you don't need all that legislation. The | :02:01. | :02:05. | |
problem is one of their unique brands is their privacy, they are | :02:06. | :02:09. | |
boastful about the fact users around the world can send these very | :02:10. | :02:12. | |
private messages, and in this day and age when we can look into all | :02:13. | :02:16. | |
corners of the Internet, and there's all this chat and spin about state | :02:17. | :02:21. | |
intrusion, it's a big deal for them. Obviously this need for security has | :02:22. | :02:25. | |
come along and many people would think it beats it in this day and | :02:26. | :02:29. | |
age when our personal safety is at risk. She is hoping very much that | :02:30. | :02:33. | |
they will do the right thing and the problem is, as we touched on | :02:34. | :02:37. | |
earlier, is whether they can. One of the things is they say it is | :02:38. | :02:41. | |
encrypted at either end and the chances are, even their own in-house | :02:42. | :02:45. | |
technicians can't access those messages, so it's case of people | :02:46. | :02:49. | |
being prepared to access bones and what you. Critics have said is there | :02:50. | :02:55. | |
a need for this and the practicalities of imposing it on a | :02:56. | :03:00. | |
global scale. The concern is if you provide a backdoor way to access | :03:01. | :03:04. | |
these messages, anybody could do it if you have the know-how, whether | :03:05. | :03:08. | |
your intentions are good or bad. Absolutely. In the UK if the | :03:09. | :03:12. | |
government said in the UK you can't use end to end encryption or it has | :03:13. | :03:17. | |
to be designed with a back door so security services can access it, | :03:18. | :03:19. | |
there's the problem that other actors may want to do that and | :03:20. | :03:24. | |
there's the problem of what that says internationally. It's the | :03:25. | :03:28. | |
British government you can trust us, we are a good government, we're not | :03:29. | :03:32. | |
a bad government. I have some sympathy with why WhatsApp sticks to | :03:33. | :03:35. | |
its opinions but there's a stronger argument for some of the issues | :03:36. | :03:44. | |
around and Publication than this one, WhatsApp are reducing to hand | :03:45. | :03:48. | |
over these messages -- around Google. I would argue why we have | :03:49. | :03:53. | |
become so attached to an app that didn't exist over three or four | :03:54. | :03:57. | |
years ago and people are thinking they need industrial level | :03:58. | :04:00. | |
encryption to their mates about where they are meeting for the pub. | :04:01. | :04:06. | |
I'm not sure that is necessary. Whether you gain these extra | :04:07. | :04:10. | |
privacies by accident or design, once you've got then, many people | :04:11. | :04:13. | |
will say you shouldn't have to give them up. Winning them back over | :04:14. | :04:18. | |
becomes a big deal. Maybe that's the case and maybe 30 years ago we will | :04:19. | :04:23. | |
look at the Wild West we allow the Internet to become, and we have | :04:24. | :04:27. | |
allowed it to become an open market with little regulation and control. | :04:28. | :04:30. | |
Perhaps people will look at the start of the social media age and | :04:31. | :04:34. | |
look at the way we didn't regulate it as absurd. We know many | :04:35. | :04:39. | |
politicians have said the market will dictate everything. It could be | :04:40. | :04:44. | |
in this day and age post trauma, people feel strongly enough to be | :04:45. | :04:49. | |
hunting down an equivalent WhatsApp mechanism that doesn't have this | :04:50. | :04:54. | |
encryption. If there's a boy boycott them WhatsApp will have to do | :04:55. | :05:02. | |
something. Markets don't make decisions about this. Companies are | :05:03. | :05:06. | |
making announcements about their business model and our government is | :05:07. | :05:10. | |
saying can you talk to us, instead of saying we are going to legislate | :05:11. | :05:14. | |
and close down your business and fine you. The Sun is campaigning on | :05:15. | :05:23. | |
this. That is the Sun's view, the headline implies it is, it may not | :05:24. | :05:27. | |
be, it may be paraphrasing what the security services have been saying. | :05:28. | :05:35. | |
They can't decode encrypted messages, though, going back to the | :05:36. | :05:40. | |
initial point. Maybe I have misunderstood the technology, maybe | :05:41. | :05:43. | |
WhatsApp are lying saying their technicians can't access these | :05:44. | :05:46. | |
messages or see other people's messages. They haven't done this to | :05:47. | :05:52. | |
create a hiding place. They've developed something and said it's | :05:53. | :05:57. | |
nothing to do with us what it is used for, if people send messages as | :05:58. | :06:01. | |
terrorists. I understand that but as time goes on it becomes more | :06:02. | :06:06. | |
intolerable. You hear two things from these companies, one is it has | :06:07. | :06:11. | |
nothing to do with us, we just provide the platform, that is | :06:12. | :06:15. | |
unacceptable. Then they say we believe in the first Amendment, and | :06:16. | :06:19. | |
my response is you're in the UK, not the US. The issue with WhatsApp, | :06:20. | :06:26. | |
they are not a publisher like YouTube or Google. They are device, | :06:27. | :06:32. | |
they are an app, they are thing, we use it merrily because we can do | :06:33. | :06:36. | |
group messages and phone calls and send snaps. It has made life easy. | :06:37. | :06:41. | |
It makes you wonder, a wise friend always says to me, if you can't work | :06:42. | :06:45. | |
out what the product is, you are the product and I have been happily | :06:46. | :06:49. | |
using WhatsApp for a long time and it makes you wonder, who am I | :06:50. | :06:54. | |
helping? It is very new to me, you just pick up the phone! On the Sun, | :06:55. | :06:59. | |
defiant daughter revealed, daughter revealed, the daughter of Khalid | :07:00. | :07:08. | |
Masood, whose name is Tegan, who defied his orders it says. I don't | :07:09. | :07:12. | |
want to break any journalistic competences but when it says | :07:13. | :07:15. | |
something has emerged that means it was in the Sunday Times yesterday. | :07:16. | :07:20. | |
If you want to know about it it is all there. Looking in the Times, | :07:21. | :07:26. | |
ices uses terror attack to sign up YouTube recruits, Google fails to | :07:27. | :07:30. | |
stop deluge of propaganda videos -- Isis. What is the evidence that | :07:31. | :07:36. | |
recruitment has taken place despite just the videos -- and not just the | :07:37. | :07:44. | |
videos? The hundreds of foreign fighters in Syria is the evidence. | :07:45. | :07:47. | |
The government in terms of legislation is on a stronger footing | :07:48. | :07:52. | |
here. These tech companies will say they believe in freedom of speech, | :07:53. | :07:57. | |
very nice, but in this case you are a publisher, we are all journalists, | :07:58. | :08:01. | |
if we published hard-core pornography in a newspaper the | :08:02. | :08:05. | |
police would come looking. There are regulations around standards and the | :08:06. | :08:07. | |
government needs to assert itself now. They had to cajole and persuade | :08:08. | :08:13. | |
these companies to take trial sex abuse images off their platforms, | :08:14. | :08:17. | |
they had to be convinced of that. I think the government needs to be a | :08:18. | :08:22. | |
lot harsher with Facebook... Sorry, with Google over YouTube and say if | :08:23. | :08:26. | |
you don't start shutting this down, we will start shutting you down and | :08:27. | :08:30. | |
the issue is these companies have vast revenues, they don't want to | :08:31. | :08:33. | |
pay to regulate their own content. It would be time consuming and a | :08:34. | :08:38. | |
difficult thing to do. They don't want to do it so they say first | :08:39. | :08:42. | |
Amendment rights, nothing to do with us. Mark Zuckerberg has used the | :08:43. | :08:46. | |
same argument because of the delay in regulation in the Facebook world. | :08:47. | :08:51. | |
Brexit negotiators and risk rushing into harmful trade deals in the | :08:52. | :08:57. | |
Times. Steve Wilcock from the School of economics, the LSE, helping civil | :08:58. | :09:02. | |
servants get ready for these investigations. He is really saying | :09:03. | :09:06. | |
that this idea of no deal is better than a bad deal, a great soundbite | :09:07. | :09:11. | |
but Theresa May is taking issue with that. He is taking issue with that. | :09:12. | :09:16. | |
It's interesting what he is saying about trade deals, what the | :09:17. | :09:19. | |
government is saying, as soon as we leave the EU we will be able to do | :09:20. | :09:24. | |
quick trade deals with the US, China, Australia and the. He is | :09:25. | :09:29. | |
warning against the political expediency saying we can get this | :09:30. | :09:32. | |
done in two years or 18 months will produce bad trade deals -- and New | :09:33. | :09:36. | |
Zealand. Trade deals take as long as they take. The government is keen to | :09:37. | :09:41. | |
give off the impression that as soon as we leave trade deals will be done | :09:42. | :09:45. | |
across the piece and he is warning it could be more complex and you | :09:46. | :09:49. | |
need to be more wary and ring into a trade negotiation with the Trump | :09:50. | :09:58. | |
White House and the big factor is time -- entering into. When you look | :09:59. | :10:03. | |
at the trade deals the WTO has been involved in, they go for years. I | :10:04. | :10:09. | |
think they are not looking at the size of the EU. We have talked about | :10:10. | :10:14. | |
how it has been fractured by the UK removing itself, but it remains an | :10:15. | :10:17. | |
enormous trading mechanism. People will say we will be fine, and it | :10:18. | :10:22. | |
just seems to me as though the message is Brexit will work at any | :10:23. | :10:27. | |
cost and we will make anything... It can't be seen to fail. If we're | :10:28. | :10:31. | |
going to leave the EU we have to make Brexit work one way or another. | :10:32. | :10:36. | |
Saying a bad deal is better than no deal, I understand why she says it | :10:37. | :10:40. | |
and she says it because her predecessor David Cameron went into | :10:41. | :10:43. | |
European negotiations saying it would be tough, and he came back | :10:44. | :10:47. | |
with nothing, that's why we had a referendum and he lost because he | :10:48. | :10:51. | |
came at it from a position of weakness and not having the vision | :10:52. | :10:55. | |
to say we will leave if we don't get what we want. We should be willing | :10:56. | :10:59. | |
them to get good deals quickly. Of course we should. He is warning that | :11:00. | :11:03. | |
you should do trade deals within a set period because it is politically | :11:04. | :11:06. | |
expedient for you, you should recognise they are more complex than | :11:07. | :11:10. | |
that and if it takes three years rather than two years, it will be | :11:11. | :11:14. | |
better. I think he is saying country above party again. Looking at the | :11:15. | :11:20. | |
Telegraph, GPs failing women, say MPs. According to this article | :11:21. | :11:24. | |
nearly half of women need to visit their GP ten times before being | :11:25. | :11:29. | |
diagnosed with common gynaecological complaints. This is slightly odd | :11:30. | :11:33. | |
because we get invitations at various ages to go for all sorts of | :11:34. | :11:38. | |
checks and tests. I also think that a lot of these conditions that have | :11:39. | :11:42. | |
been referred to are outsourced to different screening centres. I'm not | :11:43. | :11:46. | |
sure if that has somehow been lost in the small print but actually a | :11:47. | :11:49. | |
lot of women are catered for elsewhere. But these big is alone | :11:50. | :11:53. | |
are pretty shocking. Anecdotally, I'm not sure if any of my friends | :11:54. | :11:57. | |
would stand for ten visits before they get told it's maybe not in your | :11:58. | :12:03. | |
head. -- these figures. Some women reported feeling they were going mad | :12:04. | :12:06. | |
after being told there was nothing wrong despite years of painful | :12:07. | :12:10. | |
symptoms. As I would say, if it was a man it would be slightly fewer | :12:11. | :12:17. | |
visits. Although, sometimes it has been argued services for men's | :12:18. | :12:20. | |
health has not been as well advertised and funded as those for | :12:21. | :12:26. | |
women. Men are much less likely to see a doctor, women seek reassurance | :12:27. | :12:30. | |
from doctors more than men and that can lead to serious health problems. | :12:31. | :12:34. | |
As a man, I am really shocked by this and it's another reminder to me | :12:35. | :12:38. | |
of the million ways in which women are treated differently in our | :12:39. | :12:41. | |
society, the million ways they can be discriminated against and it's | :12:42. | :12:45. | |
really good the APPG on women's health, a parliamentary group that | :12:46. | :12:49. | |
has produced the best, the sort of group 20 years ago Tory MPs would | :12:50. | :12:55. | |
have laughed at as people like Harriet Harman pushed forward these | :12:56. | :12:58. | |
agendas, it's now so prominent they can be on the front page of the | :12:59. | :13:01. | |
Telegraph and the work they are doing is taken seriously because it | :13:02. | :13:05. | |
is serious. And it is cross-party? It is. A surprise because so many | :13:06. | :13:10. | |
women are GPs. It's not like it's an old men's club in the centre of | :13:11. | :13:14. | |
London. So little time when you get in to see a GP, the clock is | :13:15. | :13:18. | |
ticking! I don't know whether I have anything to say about this next | :13:19. | :13:25. | |
story. Not that I need to! The Daily Mail, Harry, Prince Harry, and his | :13:26. | :13:30. | |
American actress girlfriend, Meghan, are setting up home together. | :13:31. | :13:39. | |
Discuss. That's interesting! Is it? They are going to be moving into | :13:40. | :13:43. | |
Kensington Palace, reports claim, which is reasonably significant in | :13:44. | :13:46. | |
terms of whether they will actually get together. I would have been | :13:47. | :13:50. | |
surprised if the Royal family would have thought a divorced American | :13:51. | :13:53. | |
actress would have been an appropriate consort for someone | :13:54. | :13:57. | |
already quite close to the throne in terms of in-line for the throne but | :13:58. | :14:01. | |
change and the Queen has changed with them. Prince Harry is not going | :14:02. | :14:06. | |
to be king, is he crazy I have been watching the series about the Royal | :14:07. | :14:13. | |
House of Windsor. If he sets up home with his girlfriend, we know that | :14:14. | :14:17. | |
William and Kate set up house, it was very lovely in the Welsh privacy | :14:18. | :14:22. | |
of Anglesey. We know that Edward did. Anything but another royal | :14:23. | :14:27. | |
divorce, anything. We will wait and see, we wish them well whatever they | :14:28. | :14:31. | |
choose. That's the papers for tonight. Caroline and Tony, lovely | :14:32. | :14:36. | |
to see you. As always, thank you very much. Coming up next, The Film | :14:37. | :14:38. | |
Review. | :14:39. | :14:39. |